Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Data Safety vs. App Privacy: Comparing the Usability of Android and iOS Privacy Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.03918 v2 pith:KJAQA3F4 submitted 2023-12-06 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords labelsusersandroiddataprivacycollectionfoundinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Privacy labels -- standardized, compact representations of data collection and data use practices -- are often presented as a solution to the shortcomings of privacy policies. Apple introduced mandatory privacy labels for apps in its App Store in December 2020; Google introduced mandatory labels for Android apps in July 2022. iOS app privacy labels have been evaluated and critiqued in prior work. In this work, we evaluated Android Data Safety Labels and explored how differences between the two label designs impact user comprehension and label utility. We conducted a between-subjects, semi-structured interview study with 12 Android users and 12 iOS users. While some users found Android Data Safety Labels informative and helpful, other users found them too vague. Compared to iOS App Privacy Labels, Android users found the distinction between data collection groups more intuitive and found explicit inclusion of omitted data collection groups more salient. However, some users expressed skepticism regarding elided information about collected data type categories. Most users missed critical information due to not expanding the accordion interface, and they were surprised by collection practices excluded from Android's definitions. Our findings also revealed that Android users generally appreciated information about security practices included in the labels, and iOS users wanted that information added.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: From Generation to Consumption of Privacy Documents in Software Systems

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 290 papers (2010 to 2025) organizes privacy-document research into a five-stage lifecycle and identifies 15 trends, 21 opportunities, and 4 research directions.

  2. Privacy Bills of Materials: A Transparent Privacy Information Inventory for Collaborative Privacy Notice Generation in Mobile App Development

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PriBOM is a UI-widget-indexed privacy bill of materials for creating and maintaining app privacy notices, supported by positive but self-reported survey feedback.

Pith tools