Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Regularization for point vortices on $\mathbb S^2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs families of small vortex-patch solutions of the incompressible Euler equations on the unit sphere whose vorticity converges, as the patch size tends to zero, to point-vortex equilibria: the von Kármán vortex street…

desk verdict First patch regularization on S2; the Kármán street theorem is solid and detailed, but the general steady theorem depends on an unproved, internally inconsistent projection lemma. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11388 v1 pith:KJPFFA75 submitted 2024-11-18 math.AP

Takashi Sakajo , Changjun Zou This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 76B4776B03
keywords incompressibleEulerequationsonspherevortexpatchpointregularizationvonKármánstreetLyapunov–SchmidtreductionKirchhoff–Routhfunctiondesingularization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that point-vortex equilibria on the rotating unit sphere are not merely singular idealizations: they are the zero-size limits of genuine solution families of the incompressible Euler equations. It constructs, for each small $\varepsilon>0$, a vorticity field made of $k$ positive and $k$ negative patches whose stream function solves the patch equation (1.6), with the positive and negative patches located near the vortices of the $k$-fold von Kármán street on $\mathbb S^2$. As $\varepsilon\to 0$, the vorticity converges in the sense of measures to the point-vortex street, and the patch boundaries are $C^1$ curves that shrink like $\sqrt{\kappa/(\pi\varepsilon)}$. A second theorem extends the construction to a general steady vortex-wave system: $j$ positive and $k$ negative patches placed near a nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff–Routh function, with a background vorticity $2\gamma\cos\theta$ coming from the sphere's rotation. A sympathetic reader would care because this is the first regularization of point-vortex equilibria on $\mathbb S^2$, connecting the singular point-vortex model to the smooth patch model on a curved geometry.

What carries the argument

The construction is carried out by Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction. The approximate solution is built from scaled copies of the planar Rankine vortex: near each vortex location $z_i^\pm$, the stream function is modeled on the Rankine vortex profile, with radius $s_\varepsilon$ satisfying $s_\varepsilon=\sqrt{\kappa/(\pi\varepsilon)}+o(\varepsilon)$, and the regular part of the Green function is added as a smooth correction. The linearized operator $L_\varepsilon$ is invertible only modulo an approximate kernel spanned by the $\theta$- and $\phi$-derivatives of these Rankine profiles; the projection onto this kernel is eliminated by choosing the traveling speed $W_\varepsilon$ in the symmetric street case, and by adjusting the $2j+2k$ patch locations in the general steady case. The key identity (Lemma 2.6, and its analogue Lemma 3.2 for the general case) computes the projection of the equation onto the kernel modes as $\kappa$-weighted derivatives of the Green function and the Kirchhoff–Routh function, turning the degeneracy into a finite-dimensional condition that the implicit function theorem solves.

What would settle it

Compute the left-hand side of Lemma 3.2 directly for the simplest case $j=k=1$ with two patches of opposite sign near a critical point of $K_2$; if the displayed sums do not reproduce the stated $\kappa$-weighted derivatives with a true $o_\varepsilon(1)$ error, then the finite-dimensional system in the proof of Theorem 1.4 has no solution and the locations $z_{m,\varepsilon}^\pm$ are not determined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4. For the von Kármán street (type 1 or type 2, with $0<\theta_0\le \pi/2$), for each sufficiently small $\varepsilon$ there is a traveling-wave solution $(\psi_\varepsilon, W_\varepsilon)$ of (1.6); the vorticity $\omega_\varepsilon=(-\Delta_{\mathbb S^2})\psi_\varepsilon$ converges in the sense of measures to $\kappa\sum_i\delta_{z_i^+}-\kappa\sum_i\delta_{z_i^-}$, and each patch boundary is a $C^1$ closed curve parameterized as $z_i^\pm+[\sqrt{\kappa/(\pi\varepsilon)}+o(\varepsilon)](\cos\xi,\sin^{-1}\theta_0\,\sin\xi)$. For the general steady case, for any nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff–Routh function $K_{k+j}$, there is for each small $\varepsilon$ a solution $\psi_\varepsilon$ of (1.8) with $j$ positive and $k$ negative patches whose centers converge to the critical point, and whose vorticity converges in measure to the vortex-wave system $\sum_m\kappa_m^+\delta_{z_m^+}-\sum_n\kappa_n^-\delta_{z_n^-}+2\gamma\cos\theta$. The paper claims these are the first patch-type regularizations of point-vortex equilibria on $\mathbb S^2$, and that the dynamic quantities (traveling speed, patch location) are controlled by the same Green-function and Kirchhoff–Routh data that govern point-vortex motion.

Load-bearing premise

The general steady case (Theorem 1.4) rests on the unproved projection identity in Lemma 3.2, which asserts that the integrals of the equation against the approximate kernel modes equal $\kappa$-weighted derivatives of the Green function and the Kirchhoff–Routh function up to $o_\varepsilon(1)$; if that identity fails, the corrected patch locations are not shown to exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each von Kármán street configuration of type 1 or type 2 with $0<\theta_0\le \pi/2$ is a genuine measure-valued limit of patch-type Euler solutions on $\mathbb S^2$, not just a formal point-vortex equilibrium.
  • The traveling angular velocity $W_\varepsilon$ of the regularized street converges to the point-vortex street speed computed from the Green function and Robin function on $\mathbb S^2$, so the patch regularization selects the point-vortex dynamics.
  • By Lemma 1.1, the traveling patch solutions yield non-localized steady solutions on a rotating sphere with background vorticity $2\gamma\cos\theta$, connecting the traveling and rotating frames.
  • Any nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff–Routh function $K_{k+j}$ on $\mathbb S^2$ supports a family of $j$ positive and $k$ negative vortex patches whose centers converge to that critical point, so the general steady vortex-wave system is regularized.
  • Each patch boundary is a $C^1$ curve that is a small perturbation of an ellipse in spherical coordinates, with radius of order $\sqrt{\kappa/(\pi\varepsilon)}$, matching the planar desingularization scaling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the missing proof of Lemma 3.2 is supplied, the same Lyapunov–Schmidt scheme should extend to other point-vortex equilibria on $\mathbb S^2$ that arise as nondegenerate critical points of the Kirchhoff–Routh function, including the ring and crystal configurations catalogued for the sphere.
  • The $C^1$ regularity and the explicit $o(\varepsilon)$ correction in the boundary parametrization suggest that a sharper asymptotic expansion would show the patches are elliptical to next order; that ellipticity would be a direct analogue of Kirchhoff's elliptic vortex on the sphere.
  • The paper does not address stability; a natural testable extension is whether the regularized patches inherit the stability or instability of the underlying point-vortex equilibria, for instance by computing the spectrum of the linearized Euler evolution around the constructed solutions.
  • Because the flux constants $\mu_\varepsilon$ and the level-set formulation are explicit, one could numerically verify the convergence rates in Theorem 1.2 by solving (1.6) for small $\varepsilon$ and comparing patch boundaries with the predicted radius $\sqrt{\kappa/(\pi\varepsilon)}$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs vortex-patch solutions of the incompressible Euler equation on the unit sphere S^2 that desingularize two families of point-vortex equilibria. Theorem 1.2 treats the k-fold symmetric von Kármán vortex street: for each small ε, the authors build a 2k-patch solution with a traveling angular speed W_ε, whose vorticity converges as measures to the signed sum of Dirac masses at the street locations, and whose patch boundaries are C^1 perturbations of ellipses with radius sqrt(κ/(π ε)) + o(ε). Theorem 1.4 treats a general steady vortex-wave system: near a nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff–Routh function (1.7), j positive and k negative patches with prescribed circulations are constructed, together with a non-localized vorticity contribution 2γ cosθ coming from the sphere rotation. The proofs use a Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction: Section 2 gives a detailed analysis for the street case, while Section 3, on the general steady case, is much more compressed and relies on an unproved projection identity, Lemma 3.2.

Significance. If the results are correct, they provide the first rigorous regularization of singular point-vortex equilibria on S^2 by genuine vortex patches, extending the planar desingularization literature to the spherical geometry. The strength of the paper is Section 2: the Kármán-street construction is carried out in full detail, with explicit coercive estimates (Lemma 2.2), a solvability and contraction argument (Lemmas 2.3 and 2.5), and a complete one-dimensional reduction (Lemma 2.6) that yields an explicit asymptotic formula for the traveling speed. The construction is not circular: the speed W_ε and patch centers are solved from the reduction, not fitted to data, and the Green-function splitting is standard. The main weakness is Section 3: the general steady case is asserted rather than proved, with Lemma 3.1 delegated 'by a similar spirit of Lemma 2.2,' the contraction step asserted in one sentence, and the key projection identity Lemma 3.2 stated without proof and with internally inconsistent formulas.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Lemma 3.2] Lemma 3.2 is the load-bearing projection identity for Theorem 1.4: it converts the vanishing of the projection vector Λ into the finite-dimensional system that, together with nondegeneracy of the Kirchhoff–Routh critical point, should determine the corrected centers z±_{l,ε}. The lemma is stated without proof, and its displayed formulas are internally inconsistent. In the X+_{m,ε} identity the prefactor is κ+_m while the interior sums use undefined indices κ+_i and κ−_l; in the Y+_{m,ε} identity the prefactor is κ−_m instead of κ+_m; in the X−_{n,ε} identity the Robin term H is evaluated at z+_{n,ε} rather than z−_{n,ε}, and the interaction sums mix z+ and z− arguments. These may be typographical, but the exact coefficients and Green-function arguments determine the reduced equations, so a substantive error here would break the existence of the corrected centers. As written, the key expansion needed for Theorem 1.4 is missing and must be supplied and verified.
  2. [Section 3.2, Proof of Theorem 1.4] The final step of the proof of Theorem 1.4 is only a claim: 'there exists a proper location series (z+_{1,ε},...,z−_{k,ε}) = (z+_1,...,z−_k) + o_ε(1) such that Λ = 0.' The authors do not write the finite-dimensional system obtained from Lemma 3.2, do not display its Jacobian, and do not show how the nondegenerate Hessian of K_{k+j} and the implicit function theorem yield the corrected locations. Since the whole existence argument for the general steady case rests on this reduction, the proof needs a complete presentation of this step.
  3. [Section 3.1, Lemmas 3.1 and the contraction argument] The general steady case introduces new difficulties compared to Section 2: the approximate kernel is (2j+2k)-dimensional, the centers z±_{l,ε} are variable, and the cutoff functions and kernels are centered at these moving points. Lemma 3.1 is asserted 'by a similar spirit of Lemma 2.2' without proof, and the existence of the unique fixed point φ_ε for the projected problem is asserted in one sentence rather than proved. These are not cosmetic omissions: the coercive estimate with moving centers and the contraction estimate for the multi-patch nonlinearity are needed to justify the later projection step. The authors should either give the full arguments or state precisely which parts are identical to Section 2 and which require modification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] There are several typos in the abstract and introduction: 'Eu ler' for 'Euler', 'close curve' for 'closed curve', and in Theorem 1.2(iii) the type-2 formula contains 'πi/2k' in the H term, which should presumably be 'π/2k'. The chart C2 definition in Section 1.1 also appears to have a missing or erroneous component.
  2. [Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4, parameterization formulas] The patch-boundary parameterization 'z±_i + [sqrt(κ/π ε)+o(ε)](cos ξ, sin^{-1}θ0 sin ξ)' is ambiguous because the second component is not a coordinate on the sphere in the usual sense; please clarify the meaning of 'sin^{-1}θ0' (whether it is 1/sin θ0) and how this expression relates to the tangent-map coordinates used in Section 2.
  3. [Section 2, Lemma 2.4] The definition of H(ξ) contains the term '−(W_ε sinθ_0,0)' inside an inner product with a vector field; this is notationally inconsistent with the scalar character of W_ε. Consider rewriting the term as an explicit derivative of W_ε cosθ or as a scalar product with the tangent vector.
  4. [Section 3, notation] In Lemma 3.2, the notation for the level sets and kernels mixes superscripts + and − (for example, 1_{B_δ(z+_m)} appears in the negative X− equation). The authors should systematically use consistent subscripts and superscripts so that each identity can be checked term by term.
  5. [References] The reference to [4] is used for the planar Kármán street result, but the connection between the present spherical construction and the planar one could be stated more explicitly in Section 1.3, especially concerning how the Green-function splitting (1.1) changes the reduced equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the Lyapunov–Schmidt construction determines W_epsilon and the patch centers from the reduced equations rather than from fitted inputs; the main weakness is an unproved expansion in Lemma 3.2, which is a completeness gap, not a circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs. In Theorem 1.2, the approximate solution is built from Rankine vortices and the Green-function splitting G = Gamma + H, the linearized problem is solved by the coercive estimate of Lemma 2.2, and the traveling speed W_epsilon is chosen by setting the projection coefficient Lambda = 0. Lemma 2.6 is actually proved and yields W_epsilon = W* + o_epsilon(1), with W* taken from the external point-vortex dynamics of Dritschel–Boatto [15]; this is a genuine asymptotic prediction, not a fitted parameter. In Theorem 1.4, the centers z±_{l,epsilon} are selected by the implicit function theorem from the condition Lambda = 0, using the assumed nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff–Routh function; this is the standard Lyapunov–Schmidt mechanism. The serious weakness is that Lemma 3.2, which supplies the projection identities that identify Lambda = 0 with the critical-point equations, is stated without proof and with apparently inconsistent circulation indices and Green-function arguments. That is an omitted proof and a reproducibility risk, but it is not circular: the lemma is asserted as a new expansion, not derived from the theorem it is used to prove, and the paper does not rename a fitted value as a prediction. Self-citations to [4], [29], and [30] are contextual or motivational; the only externally cited input actually used in the proof, Theorem 2.1 from [5], is not by the present authors. No step satisfies the quoted-reduction test for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fit to data. The parameters kappa, gamma, theta0, k, and epsilon are prescribed inputs or the small regularization scale. The proof imports standard background: Green function splitting, the Rankine kernel theorem from [5], Hamiltonian point vortex dynamics from [15], and elliptic and Fredholm theory. Theorem 1.4 assumes a nondegenerate Kirchhoff-Routh critical point. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The linearized Rankine vortex operator L0 in (2.5) has kernel spanned by partial_w/partial_y1 and partial_w/partial_y2 (Theorem 2.1).
    Invoked in Lemma 2.2 to identify the approximate kernel and prove the coercive estimate; it is quoted from the planar literature [5] rather than proved.
  • domain assumption Point vortex dynamics on a closed surface is Hamiltonian with the Kirchhoff-Routh function, including the traveling speed formula for the S^2 vortex street.
    Used in Section 1.3 to define the target equilibria and in Lemma 2.6 and Lemma 3.2 to identify limiting speeds and the finite-dimensional system; taken from Dritschel and Boatto [15].
  • standard math The Green function on S^2 splits as G = Gamma + H with H smooth near the diagonal.
    Starting point of the approximation in equation (1.1); standard singular expansion for the Laplace-Beltrami Green function.
  • domain assumption The designated point vortex configuration in Theorem 1.4 is a nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff-Routh function K_{k+j}.
    Explicit hypothesis needed for the implicit function theorem that solves the (2j+2k)-dimensional system for the patch locations in the proof of Theorem 1.4.
  • standard math Fredholm alternative and elliptic regularity for the projected linear problem.
    Used in Lemma 2.3 to convert the coercive estimate of Lemma 2.2 into existence of the projected solution T_epsilon h.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularization for point vortices on $\mathbb S^2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KJPFFA75

@misc{pith2026241111388,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularization for point vortices on $\mathbb S^2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KJPFFA75}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11388}
}
abstract

We construct a series of patch type solutions for incompressible Euler equation on $\mathbb S^2$, which constitutes the regularization for steady or traveling point vortex systems. We first prove the existence of $k$-fold symmetric patch solutions, whose limit is the well-known von K\'arm\'an point vortex street on $\mathbb S^2$; then we consider the general steady case, where besides a non-localized part induced by the sphere rotation, $j$ positive and $k$ negative patches are located near a nondegenerate critical point of the Kirchhoff--Routh function on $\mathbb S^2$. Our construction is accomplished by Lyapunov--Schmidt reduction argument, where the traveling speed or vortex patch location are used to eliminate the degenerate direction of a linearized operator. We also show that the boundary of each vortex patch is a $C^1$ close curve, which is a perturbation of a small ellipse in the spherical coordinates. As far as we know, this is the first attempt for a regularization of the point-vortex equilibria on $\mathbb S^2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arnol’d, V.I.: Variational principles for three–dimensional steady –state flows of an ideal fluid. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 29, 1002–1008 (1965); Translation of Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 29, 846–851 (1965) https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(65)90119-X

    doi:10.1016/0021-8928(65)90119-x 1965

  2. [2]

    Berti, M., Hassainia, Z., Masmoudi, N.: Time quasi–periodic vortex pa tches of Euler equation in the plane. Invent. math. 233, 1279–1391 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-023- 01195-4

    doi:10.1007/s00222-023- 2023

  3. [3]

    Burbea, J.: Motions of vortex patches. Lett. Math. Phys. 6, 1–16 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02281165 30 TAKASHI SAKAJO, CHANGJUN ZOU

    doi:10.1007/bf02281165 1982

  4. [4]

    Cao, D., Qin, G., Zhan, W., Zou, C.: K´ arm´ an vortex street for th e generalized sur- face quasi–geostrophic equation, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 62 , 168 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-023-02518-2

    doi:10.1007/s00526-023-02518-2 2023

  5. [5]

    Cao, D., Peng, S., Yan, S.: Planar vortex patch problem in incompre ssible steady flow, Adv. Math. , 270 (2015), 263–301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2014.09.027

    doi:10.1016/j.aim.2014.09.027 2015

  6. [6]

    arXiv: 2305.03279

    Cao D., Wang G., Zuo B.: Stability of degree–2 Rossby–Haurwitz wav es. arXiv: 2305.03279

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Caprino, S., Marchioro, C.: On nonlinear stability of stationary Eule r flows on a rotating sphere. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 129 , 24–36 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(88)90231- 4

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-247x(88)90231- 1988

  8. [8]

    Castro, A, C´ ordoba, D, G´ omez–Serrano, J.: Uniformly rotat ing smooth solutions for the incompressible 2D Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 231, no. 2, 719–785 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-018-1288-3

    doi:10.1007/s00205-018-1288-3 2019

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Constantin, A., Germain, P: Stratospheric Planetary Flows from the Perspective of the Euler Equation on a Rotating Sphere. Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. 245, 587–644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-022-01791-3

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Rational

    Davila, J., Del Pino, M., Musso M., Wei J.: Gluing Methods for Vortex Dynamics in Euler Flows, Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. , 235 (2020), 1467–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-019 -01448-8

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    N.J.: Vortex waves: stationary ”V–state s” interactions, recurrence, and break- ing

    Deem, G.S., Zabusky. N.J.: Vortex waves: stationary ”V–state s” interactions, recurrence, and break- ing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40(13), 859–862 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40 .859

    1978 doi

  4. [12]

    de la Hoz, F., Hmidi, T., Mateu, J., Verdera, J.: Doubly connected V –states for the planar Euler equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 48(3), 1892–1928 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1137/140992801

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    Delort, J.-M.: Existence de nappes de tourbillon en dimension deux . J. Amer. Math. Soc. 4, no. 3, 553–586 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-1991-11 0257-6

    1991 doi

  6. [14]

    DiPerna, R.J., Majda, A.J.: Concentrations in regularizations for 2–D incompressible flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 40, no. 3, 301–345 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.316040030 4

    1987 doi

  7. [15]

    Dritschel D.G., Boatto S.: The motion of point vortices on closed s urfaces. Proc. R. Soc. A. 471: 20140890 (2015) http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2014.0890

    2015

  8. [16]

    Elgindi, T.M., Jeong, I.–J.: Symmetries and critical phenomena in flu ids. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 73(2), 257–316 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21829

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    arXiv: 2306

    Garc ´ ıa, C., Hassainia Z., Roulley, E.: Dynamics of vortex cap solut ions on the rotating unit sphere. arXiv: 2306. 00154

  10. [18]

    International Geophysics Series

    Gregory J.H., Holton J.R.: An introduction to dynamic meteorology . International Geophysics Series. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 4 edition, 2004

    2004

  11. [19]

    Hassainia, Z., Hmidi, T.: On the V–states for the generalized quas i–geostrophic equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 337, no. 1, 321–377 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-015-2 300-5

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    To appear in Mem

    Hassainia, Z., Hmidi, T., Masmoudi, N.: Kam theory for active scalar equations. To appear in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc

  13. [21]

    Hassainia, Z., Masmoudi, N., Wheeler, M.H.: Global bifurcation of ro tating vortex patches. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 73, no. 9, 1933–1980 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21855

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Hmidi, T., Mateu, J.: Existence of co–rotating and counter–rot ating vortex pairs for active scalar equations. Comm. Math. Phys. 350, 699–747 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-016-2784-7

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Hmidi, T., Mateu, J., Verdera, J.: Boundary regularity of rotatin g vortex patches. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 209(1), 171–208 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-013-061 8-8

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    Kirchhoff, G.: Vorlesungen uber mathematische Physik, Leipzig, (1874)

  17. [26]

    Lin, C.C.: On the motion of vortices in two dimensions. II. Some fur ther investiga- tions on the Kirchhoff–Routh function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 27, 575–577 (1941) https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814415651 0016

    1941 doi

  18. [27]

    Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathe- matics, Vol

    Majda, A.J., Bertozzi A.L.: Vorticity and incompressible flow. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathe- matics, Vol. 27. Cambridge University Press (2002) REGULARIZATION FOR POINT VORTICES ON S2 31

    2002

  19. [28]

    Springer– Verlag, New York (1994)

    Marchioro, C., Pulvirenti, M.: Mathematical theory of incompres sible nonviscous fluids. Springer– Verlag, New York (1994)

    1994

  20. [29]

    Newton, P.K., Sakajo, T.: The N-vortex problem on a rotating sp here. III. Ring configurations coupled to a background field. Proc. R. Soc. A. 463, 961–977 (2007) http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2006.1802

    2007

  21. [30]

    Newton, P.K., Sakajo, T.: Point vortex equilibria and optimal pack ings of circles on a sphere. Proc. R. Soc. A. 467, 1468–1490 (2011) http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2010.0368

    2011

  22. [31]

    N.: On zonal steady solutions to the 2D Euler equations on the rotating unit sphere

    Nualart. N.: On zonal steady solutions to the 2D Euler equations on the rotating unit sphere. Non- linearity 36, 4981 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/acec26

    2023 doi

  23. [32]

    Sakajo, T.: Vortex crystals on the surface of a torus. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A. 2158, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0344

    2019

  24. [33]

    Smets, D., Van Schaftingen, J.: Desingularization of vortices fo r the Euler equation. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 198, 869–925 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-010-0293-y

    2010 doi

  25. [34]

    Turkington, B.: On steady vortex flow in two dimensions. I, II. Comm. Partial Differ- ential Equations 8, 999–1030, 1031–1071 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1080/036053 08308820293, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605308308820294

    1983 doi

  26. [35]

    Wang, Q: The N-Vortex Problem on a Riemann Sphere. Commun. Math. Phys. 385, 565–593 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04044-8

    2021 doi

  27. [36]

    Yudovich: Non-stationary flows of an ideal incompressible fl uid

    V.I. Yudovich: Non-stationary flows of an ideal incompressible fl uid. Zhurnal Vych Matematika , 3 (1963), 1032–1106, English translation: U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. an d Math. Phys., 3 (1963), 1407– 1456

    1963

  28. [37]

    Springer, Cham, 2017

    Yuri, N.S.: Mathematical problems of the dynamics of incompress ible fluid on a rotating sphere. Springer, Cham, 2017. Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606–8 502, Japan Email address : sakajo@math.kyoto-u.ac.jp Department of Mathematics, Sichuan University, C...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.