REVIEW 1 cited by
Generalizing the Balance Heuristic Estimator in Multiple Importance Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel and generic family of multiple importance sampling estimators. We first revisit the celebrated balance heuristic estimator, a widely used Monte Carlo technique for the approximation of intractable integrals. Then, we establish a generalized framework for the combination of samples simulated from multiple proposals. We show that the novel framework contains the balance heuristic as a particular case. In addition, we study the optimal choice of the free parameters in such a way the variance of the resulting estimator is minimized. A theoretical variance study shows the optimal solution is always better than the balance heuristic estimator (except in degenerate cases where both are the same). As a side result of this analysis, we also provide new upper bounds for the balance heuristic estimator. Finally, we show the gap in the variance of both estimators by means of five numerical examples.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Revisiting the balance heuristic for estimating normalising constants
The balance heuristic estimator is recast on an extended space, yielding an unbiased parallel annealed importance sampling scheme and a general framework for estimators when proposal marginals are intractable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.