pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.12027 · v1 · pith:KKMQ22JPnew · submitted 2019-06-28 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Ultra-Compact Coupling Structures for Heterogeneously Integrated Silicon Lasers

An He , Lu Sun , Hongwei Wang , Xuhan Guo , Yikai Su This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph
keywords silicon photonicsheterogeneous integrationoptical couplersIII-V lasersphotonic integrated circuitsadiabatic tapersubwavelength grating
0
0 comments X

The pith

Redesigned taper and two new couplers achieve over 90 percent efficiency for III-V lasers on silicon in lengths of 4 to 7 micrometers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper redesigns an adiabatic taper coupler down to 4 micrometers long and introduces slot and bridge-SWG couplers each 7 micrometers long. These structures reach fundamental TE mode coupling efficiencies above 90 percent, with the bridge-SWG design hitting 95.7 percent. The authors report that the designs are the shortest reported and maintain strong tolerance to fabrication variations according to 3D-FDTD simulations that align with theoretical mode evolution. This targets the challenge of compact, efficient coupling when placing III-V light sources onto silicon-on-insulator platforms for photonic circuits.

Core claim

The redesigned taper adiabatic coupler with a total length of only 4 micrometers, together with the novel slot coupler and bridge-SWG coupler each 7 micrometers long, deliver fundamental TE mode coupling efficiencies over 90 percent (95.7 percent for the bridge-SWG), constitute the shortest such structures, and exhibit excellent fabrication tolerance, with the taper's mode coupling process matching 3D-FDTD simulations.

What carries the argument

The redesigned taper adiabatic coupler, slot coupler, and bridge-SWG coupler that convert and transfer the optical mode between III-V and silicon waveguides.

If this is right

  • The short coupler lengths reduce the overall footprint of photonic integrated circuits that include on-chip lasers.
  • High coupling efficiencies lower optical power loss when transferring light from the III-V source into the silicon waveguides.
  • Strong fabrication tolerance supports higher manufacturing yields for these coupling structures.
  • The designs enable denser heterogeneous integration of semiconductor lasers with silicon electronics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experimental confirmation of the simulated efficiencies would directly support scaling to larger arrays of integrated lasers.
  • The same coupler principles could be adapted for coupling at other wavelengths or between different material pairs.
  • Testing the designs across a range of actual fabrication process variations would reveal any unmodeled sensitivities.

Load-bearing premise

The 3D-FDTD simulations accurately predict the coupling efficiencies and fabrication tolerances that would occur in actual fabricated devices.

What would settle it

Fabricating one or more of the proposed couplers on a real III-V-on-SOI platform and measuring the actual coupling efficiency and sensitivity to fabrication errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.12027 by An He, Hongwei Wang, Lu Sun, Xuhan Guo, Yikai Su.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: For the strip waveguide, the scattering loss decreases as the waveguide width increases. As the waveguide broadens, the optical field tends to gather at the center of the waveguide, away from the rough side wall. This field distribution causes the inappreciable influence of sidewall roughness on the scattering loss. For the slot waveguide, the increase of the slot width causes the reduction of scattering l… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Coupling performance and fabrication tolerance of the bridge-SWG coupler. The influence of the slot width on (a) total mode and (b) fundamental TE mode coupling efficiency, the tip width of the first section III-V taper is 150 nm. The influence of tip width of the first section III-V taper on (c) total mode and (d) fundamental TE mode coupling efficiency, the Si tip width is 150 nm. From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Due to the inherent in-direct bandgap nature of Silicon, heterogeneous integration of semiconductor lasers on Silicon on Insulator (SOI) is crucial for next-generation on-chip optical interconnects. Compact, high-efficient and high-tolerant couplers between III-V light source and silicon chips have been the challenge for photonic integrated circuit (PIC). Here, we redesign the taper adiabatic coupler with the total coupling length of only 4 {\mu}m, and propose another two novel slot coupler and bridge-SWG coupler with both coupling length of 7 {\mu}m, to heterogeneously integrate III-V lasers and silicon chips. We study theoretically the optical mode coupling process through the redesigned taper coupler, the final coupling results match well with the simulation in 3D-FDTD. The three compact couplers represent fundamental TE mode coupling efficiencies all over 90%, even 95.7% for bridge-SWG coupler, to the best of our knowledge, are also the shortest coupling structures (7 um). Moreover, these coupling structures also possess excellent fabrication tolerance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the design of three ultra-compact coupling structures for heterogeneous integration of III-V lasers on SOI: a redesigned taper coupler of 4 μm length, and slot and bridge-SWG couplers of 7 μm length. Using theoretical optical mode coupling analysis that matches 3D-FDTD simulations, the authors report fundamental TE mode coupling efficiencies exceeding 90%, reaching 95.7% for the bridge-SWG coupler. They claim these are the shortest such structures and possess excellent fabrication tolerance.

Significance. If the simulation results hold, the designs could enable more compact photonic integrated circuits for on-chip optical interconnects by reducing the coupler footprint. The agreement between the theoretical mode-coupling analysis and the 3D-FDTD simulations is a strength, providing confidence in the design methodology. The inclusion of fabrication tolerance analysis is valuable for assessing real-world feasibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The assertion that the structures are 'the shortest coupling structures (7 um)' to the best of our knowledge is central to the novelty claim but lacks an explicit comparison to prior work in the literature; a table summarizing lengths and efficiencies from previous couplers would strengthen this.
  2. [Results from 3D-FDTD simulations] The fabrication tolerance is stated as 'excellent' but the specific parameter variations tested (e.g., width or height deviations) and the resulting efficiency changes should be quantified to support the claim for the central performance assertions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The phrasing 'the final coupling results match well with the simulation in 3D-FDTD' could be clarified by specifying which results (theoretical vs. simulated efficiencies) and providing the degree of agreement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The assertion that the structures are 'the shortest coupling structures (7 um)' to the best of our knowledge is central to the novelty claim but lacks an explicit comparison to prior work in the literature; a table summarizing lengths and efficiencies from previous couplers would strengthen this.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison to prior literature would strengthen the novelty claim. In the revised manuscript we will insert a table (likely in the introduction) that summarizes coupling lengths and efficiencies from representative previous heterogeneous III-V/SOI couplers to support the statement that our designs are the shortest reported to date. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results from 3D-FDTD simulations] The fabrication tolerance is stated as 'excellent' but the specific parameter variations tested (e.g., width or height deviations) and the resulting efficiency changes should be quantified to support the claim for the central performance assertions.

    Authors: The manuscript already contains a fabrication-tolerance study, but we acknowledge that the quantitative details could be presented more explicitly. In the revision we will add specific numbers for the tested deviations (e.g., ±50 nm and ±100 nm in width and height) together with the corresponding efficiency drops for each of the three coupler designs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from independent FDTD simulations

full rationale

The paper reports 3D-FDTD simulation results for three coupler designs (taper, slot, bridge-SWG) with stated coupling efficiencies >90%. The text notes that theoretical mode-coupling analysis for the taper matches the FDTD output, but supplies no equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce the performance numbers to inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, renamed empirical patterns, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The central claims are direct simulation outputs under standard electromagnetic modeling assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to identify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; designs rely on standard electromagnetic simulation of known coupler principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5716 in / 1123 out tokens · 36410 ms · 2026-05-25T14:11:14.867391+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Recent progress in lasers on silicon,

    D. Liang and J. E. Bowers, “Recent progress in lasers on silicon,” Nat. Publ. Gr., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 511–517, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Novel Light Source Integration Approaches for Silicon Photonics,

    Z. Wang et al., “Novel Light Source Integration Approaches for Silicon Photonics,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–21, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    III-V/silicon photonics for on-chip and intra- chip optical interconnects,

    G. Roelkens et al., “III-V/silicon photonics for on-chip and intra- chip optical interconnects,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 751–779, 2010

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    The Past , Present , and Future of Silicon Photonics,

    R. Soref, L. Fellow, and I. Paper, “The Past , Present , and Future of Silicon Photonics,” vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1678–1687, 2006

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic \nchips,

    D. A. B Miller, “Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic \nchips,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 728 –749, 2000

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    3-D integrated heterogeneous intra-chip free- space optical interconnect,

    B. Ciftcioglu et al., “3-D integrated heterogeneous intra-chip free- space optical interconnect,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 4331, 2012

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Integration of high -speed GaAs metal - semiconductor-metal photodetectors by means of transfer printing for 850 nm wavelength photonic interposers,

    G. Chen et al. , “Integration of high -speed GaAs metal - semiconductor-metal photodetectors by means of transfer printing for 850 nm wavelength photonic interposers,” Opt. Express, vol. 26, no. 5, p. 6351, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Multi - Node All-Optical Interconnect Network Routing for Data -Center Parallel Computers,

    S. Yang, L. Yang, F. Luo, B. You, Y. Ni, and D. Chen, “Multi - Node All-Optical Interconnect Network Routing for Data -Center Parallel Computers,” IEEE Photonics J. , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1 –8, 2019

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Ultra-efficient 10Gb/s hybrid integrated silicon photonic transmitter and receiver,

    X. Zheng et al., “Ultra-efficient 10Gb/s hybrid integrated silicon photonic transmitter and receiver,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 5172, 2011

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Optics in computing: From photonic network- on-chip to chip -to-chip interconnects and disintegrated architectures,

    T. Alexoudi et al., “Optics in computing: From photonic network- on-chip to chip -to-chip interconnects and disintegrated architectures,” J. Light. Technol., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 363–379, 2019

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Frequency modulated hybrid photonic crystal laser by thermal tuning,

    S. M. Butler et al., “Frequency modulated hybrid photonic crystal laser by thermal tuning,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, no. 8, p. 11312, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Interband cascade laser on silico n,

    A. Spott et al., “Interband cascade laser on silico n,” 2017 IEEE Photonics Conf. Part II, vol. 2018-Janua, no. 8, pp. 1–2, 2018

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    High -output-power, single -wavelength silicon hybrid laser using precise flip -chip bonding tech nology,

    S. Tanaka, S. -H. Jeong, S. Sekiguchi, T. Kurahashi, Y. Tanaka, and K. Morito, “High -output-power, single -wavelength silicon hybrid laser using precise flip -chip bonding tech nology,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 27, p. 28057, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Photonic Integrated Circuit based sensing modules with hybrid integration in the silicon nitride TriPleXTM platform,

    A. Leinse and D. Geuzebroek, “Photonic Integrated Circuit based sensing modules with hybrid integration in the silicon nitride TriPleXTM platform,” p. Tu2D.4, 2019

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Directly modulated quantum dot lasers on silicon with a milliampere threshold and high temperature stability,

    Y. Wan et al., “Directly modulated quantum dot lasers on silicon with a milliampere threshold and high temperature stability,” Photonics Res., vol. 6, no. 8, p. 776, 2018

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    High performance continuous wave 1.3 μ m quantum dot lasers on silicon,

    A. Y. Liu et al. , “High performance continuous wave 1.3 μ m quantum dot lasers on silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 3–7, 2014

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Room Temperature O -band DFB Laser Array Directly Grown on (001) Silicon,

    B. Tian et al. , “Room Temperature O -band DFB Laser Array Directly Grown on (001) Silicon,” Nano Lett., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 559–564, 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    1550 -nm InGaAsP multi -quantum-well structures selectively grown on v-groove-patterned SOI substrates,

    L. Megalini et al. , “1550 -nm InGaAsP multi -quantum-well structures selectively grown on v-groove-patterned SOI substrates,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 111, no. 3, 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Electrically pumped continuous -wave III -V quantum dot lasers on silicon,

    S. Chen et al. , “Electrically pumped continuous -wave III -V quantum dot lasers on silicon,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 307–311, 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Demonstration of a heterogeneously integrated III -V/SOI single wavelength tunable laser.,

    S. Keyvaninia et al. , “Demonstration of a heterogeneously integrated III -V/SOI single wavelength tunable laser.,” Opt. Express, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 3784–92, 2013

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    Ultracompact tapered coupler for the Si/III–V heterogeneous integration,

    Q. Huang, J. Cheng, L. Liu, Y. Tang, and S. He, “Ultracompact tapered coupler for the Si/III–V heterogeneous integration,” Appl. Opt., vol. 54, no. 14, p. 4327, 2015

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Heterogeneous Si/III-V integration and the optical vertical interconnect access,

    Q. Wang et al., “Heterogeneous Si/III-V integration and the optical vertical interconnect access,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 10317–10325, 2012

    work page 2012

  23. [24]

    InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers on silicon -on-insulator substrates by metal - stripe wafer bonding,

    Y. H. Jhang, K. Tanabe, S. Iwamoto, and Y. Arakawa, “InAs/GaAs quantum dot lasers on silicon -on-insulator substrates by metal - stripe wafer bonding,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 875–878, 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [25]

    High -channel-count 20 GHz passively mode -locked quantum dot laser directly grown on Si with 4 . 1 Tbit / s transmission capacity,

    S. O. L. Iu, “High -channel-count 20 GHz passively mode -locked quantum dot laser directly grown on Si with 4 . 1 Tbit / s transmission capacity,” vol. 6, no. 2, 2019

    work page 2019

  25. [26]

    A review of high -performance quantum dot lasers on silicon,

    J. C. Norman et al., “A review of high -performance quantum dot lasers on silicon,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    Reduced thermal conductivity of epitaxial GaAs on Si due to symmetry-breaking biaxial strain,

    A. Vega -Flick, D. Jung, S. Yue, J. E. Bowers, and B. Lia o, “Reduced thermal conductivity of epitaxial GaAs on Si due to symmetry-breaking biaxial strain,” Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–9, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [28]

    Heterogeneous photonic integration on silicon,

    J. E. Bowers, “Heterogeneous photonic integration on silicon,” 2016 IEEE Photonics Conf. IPC 2016, pp. 544–545, 2017

    work page 2016

  28. [29]

    Heterogeneously Integrated GaAs Waveguides on Insulator for Efficient Frequency Conversion,

    L. Chang et al., “Heterogeneously Integrated GaAs Waveguides on Insulator for Efficient Frequency Conversion,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–7, 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [30]

    Heterogeneously Integrated InP/Silicon Photonics: Fabricating fully functional transceivers,

    R. Jones et al., “Heterogeneously Integrated InP/Silicon Photonics: Fabricating fully functional transceivers,” IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 17–26, 2019

    work page 2019

  30. [31]

    Heterogeneously integrated III -V laser on thin SOI with compact optical vertical interconnect access,

    J. Pu et al., “Heterogeneously integrated III -V laser on thin SOI with compact optical vertical interconnect access,” Opt. Lett., vol. 40, no. 7, p. 1378, 2015

    work page 2015

  31. [32]

    43 Gb / s NRZ -OOK Direct Modulation of a,

    H. Integrated, I. Si, and D. F. B. Laser, “43 Gb / s NRZ -OOK Direct Modulation of a,” vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1235–1240, 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [33]

    Hybrid indium phosphide-on-silicon nanolaser diode,

    G. Crosnier et al., “Hybrid indium phosphide-on-silicon nanolaser diode,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 297–300, 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [34]

    13 μm InAs/GaAs quantum dot DFB laser integrated on a Si waveguide circuit by means of adhesive die-to- wafer bonding,

    S. Uvin et al. , “13 μm InAs/GaAs quantum dot DFB laser integrated on a Si waveguide circuit by means of adhesive die-to- wafer bonding,” Opt. Express, vol. 26, no. 14, p. 18302, 2018

    work page 2018

  34. [35]

    Low temperature full wafer adhesive bonding of structured wafers,

    F. Niklaus, H. Andersson, P. Enoksson, and G. Stemme, “Low temperature full wafer adhesive bonding of structured wafers,” Sensors Actuators, A Phys., vol. 92, no. 1–3, pp. 235–241, 2001

    work page 2001

  35. [36]

    An integrated hybrid silicon multiwavelength AWG laser,

    G. Kurczveil, M. J. R. Heck, J. D. Peters, J. M. Garcia, D. Spencer, and J. E. Bowers, “An integrated hybrid silicon multiwavelength AWG laser,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1521–1527, 2011

    work page 2011

  36. [37]

    Guiding and confining light in void nanostr ucture,

    V. R. Almeida, Q. Xu, C. A. Barrios, and M. Lipson, “Guiding and confining light in void nanostr ucture,” Opt. Lett., vol. 29, no. 11, p. 1209, 2004

    work page 2004

  37. [38]

    Analysis of scattering loss due to sidewall roughness in slot waveguides by variation of mode effective index,

    Y. Wang, M. Kong, Y. Xu, and Z. Zhou, “Analysis of scattering loss due to sidewall roughness in slot waveguides by variation of mode effective index,” J. Opt. (United Kingdom), vol. 20, no. 2, p. 25801, 2018

    work page 2018

  38. [39]

    Subwavelength structures for silicon photonics biosensing,

    J. G. Wangü emert-Pé rez et al. , “Subwavelength structures for silicon photonics biosensing,” Opt. Laser Technol., vol. 109, pp. 437–448, 2019

    work page 2019

  39. [40]

    A Compact TE -Pass Polarizer for Silicon - Based Slot Waveguides,

    Y. Xu and J. Xiao, “A Compact TE -Pass Polarizer for Silicon - Based Slot Waveguides,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 27, no. 19, pp. 2071–2074, 2015

    work page 2071

  40. [41]

    Silicon -polymer hybrid slot waveguide ring - resonator modulator,

    M. Gould et al. , “Silicon -polymer hybrid slot waveguide ring - resonator modulator,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 3952, 2011

    work page 2011

  41. [42]

    Subwavelength integrated photonics,

    P. Cheben, R. Halir, J. H. Schmid, H. A. Atwater, and D. R. Smith, “Subwavelength integrated photonics,” Nature, vol. 560, no. 7720, pp. 565–572, 2018

    work page 2018

  42. [43]

    Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: A review of principles and applications,

    R. Halir et al., “Waveguide sub-wavelength structures: A review of principles and applications,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–49, 2015

    work page 2015

  43. [44]

    Waveguide grating coupler with subwavelength microstructures,

    R. Halir, P. Cheben, S. Janz, D. -X. Xu, Í . Molina-Ferná ndez, and J. G. Wangü emert -Pérez, “Waveguide grating coupler with subwavelength microstructures,” Opt. Lett., vol. 34, no. 9, p. 1408, 2009

    work page 2009

  44. [45]

    Subwavelength gratin g filtering devices,

    J. Wang, I. Glesk, and L. R. Chen, “Subwavelength gratin g filtering devices,” Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 13, p. 15335, 2014

    work page 2014

  45. [46]

    Compact and monolithic coarse wavelength -division multiplexer–demultiplexer fabricated by use of a high -spatial- frequency transmission grating buried in a slab waveguide,

    T. Nakazawa, S. Kittaka, K. Tsunetomo, K. Kintaka, J. Nishii, and K. Hirao, “Compact and monolithic coarse wavelength -division multiplexer–demultiplexer fabricated by use of a high -spatial- frequency transmission grating buried in a slab waveguide,” Opt. Lett., vol. 29, no. 11, p. 1188, 2004

    work page 2004

  46. [47]

    Demonstration of a curved sidewall grating demultiplexer on silicon,

    P. J. Bock et al. , “Demonstration of a curved sidewall grating demultiplexer on silicon,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 18, p. 19882, 2012

    work page 2012

  47. [48]

    Refractive index engineering with subwavelength gratings for efficient microphotonic couplers and planar waveguide multiplexers,

    P. Cheben et al. , “Refractive index engineering with subwavelength gratings for efficient microphotonic couplers and planar waveguide multiplexers,” Opt. Lett., vol. 35, no. 15, p. 2526, 2010

    work page 2010

  48. [49]

    Ultra -Broadband and Ultra-Compact On-Chip Silicon Polarization Beam Splitter by Using Hetero - Anisotropic Metamaterials,

    H. Xu, D. Dai, and Y. Shi, “Ultra -Broadband and Ultra-Compact On-Chip Silicon Polarization Beam Splitter by Using Hetero - Anisotropic Metamaterials,” Laser Photonics Rev., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2019

    work page 2019

  49. [50]

    Athermal silicon waveguides w ith bridged subwavelength gratings for TE and TM polarizations,

    M. Ibrahim et al. , “Athermal silicon waveguides w ith bridged subwavelength gratings for TE and TM polarizations,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 16, p. 18356, 2012

    work page 2012

  50. [51]

    A novel ultra -low loss hollow -core waveguide using subwavelength high-contrast gratings,

    Y. Zhou, V. Karagodsky, B. Pesala, F. G. Sedgwick, and C. J. Chang-Hasnain, “A novel ultra -low loss hollow -core waveguide using subwavelength high-contrast gratings,” Opt. Express, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 1508, 2009

    work page 2009

  51. [52]

    Effective metrology and standard of the surface roughness of micro/nanoscale waveguides with confocal laser scanning microscopy,

    D. Sun, H. Shang, and H. Jiang, “Effective metrology and standard of the surface roughness of micro/nanoscale waveguides with confocal laser scanning microscopy,” Opt. Lett., vol. 44, no. 4, p. 747, 2019

    work page 2019

  52. [54]

    Open foundry platform for high -performance electronic-photonic integration,

    J. S. Orcutt et al., “Open foundry platform for high -performance electronic-photonic integration,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 12222, 2012

    work page 2012

  53. [55]

    Reduced propagation loss in silicon strip and slot waveguides coated by atomic layer deposition,

    T. Alasaarela et al., “Reduced propagation loss in silicon strip and slot waveguides coated by atomic layer deposition,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 12, p. 11529, 2011

    work page 2011

  54. [56]

    Are slot and sub- wavelength grating waveguides bet ter than strip waveguides for sensing?,

    D. M. Kita, J. Michon, S. G. Johnson, and J. Hu, “Are slot and sub- wavelength grating waveguides bet ter than strip waveguides for sensing?,” vol. 5, no. 9, 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [57]

    A unified approach for radiative losses and backscattering in optical waveguides,

    D. Melati, F. Morichetti, and A. Melloni, “A unified approach for radiative losses and backscattering in optical waveguides,” J. Opt., vol. 16, no. 5, p. 55502, 2014

    work page 2014

  56. [58]

    Losses in single-mode silicon-on- insulator strip waveguides and bends,

    Y. A. Vlasov and S. J. McNab, “Losses in single-mode silicon-on- insulator strip waveguides and bends,” Opt. Express, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 1622, 2004

    work page 2004

  57. [59]

    A theoretical analysis of scattering loss from planar optical waveguides,

    F. P. Payne and J. P. R. Lacey, “A theoretical analysis of scattering loss from planar optical waveguides,” Opt. Quantum Electron., vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 977–986, 1994

    work page 1994

  58. [60]

    Novel adiabatic tapered couplers for active III–V/SOI devices fabricated through transfer printing,

    S. Dhoore, S. Uvin, D. Van Thourhout, G. Morthier, and G. Roelkens, “Novel adiabatic tapered couplers for active III–V/SOI devices fabricated through transfer printing,” Opt. Express, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 12976, 2016

    work page 2016

  59. [61]

    Heterogeneously integrated III -V/silicon distributed feedback lasers,

    S. Keyvaninia et al. , “Heterogeneously integrated III -V/silicon distributed feedback lasers,” Opt. Lett., vol. 38, no. 24, p. 5434, 2013

    work page 2013

  60. [62]

    Ultra-thin DVS-BCB adhesive bonding of III -V wafers, dies and multiple dies to a patterned silicon-on-insulator substrate,

    S. Keyvaninia, M. Muneeb, S. Stanković, P. J. Van Veldhoven, D. Van Thourhout, and G. Roelkens, “Ultra-thin DVS-BCB adhesive bonding of III -V wafers, dies and multiple dies to a patterned silicon-on-insulator substrate,” Opt. Mater. Express, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 35, 2013

    work page 2013

  61. [63]

    Characterization of insertion loss and back reflection in passive hybrid silicon tapers,

    G. Kurczveil, P. Pintus, M. J. R. Heck, J. D. Peters, and J. E. Bowers, “Characterization of insertion loss and back reflection in passive hybrid silicon tapers,” IEEE Photonics J., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 6600410, 2013

    work page 2013

  62. [64]

    Mode conversion based on dielectric metamaterial in silicon,

    D. Ohana and U. Levy, “Mode conversion based on dielectric metamaterial in silicon,” Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 22, p. 27617, 2014

    work page 2014