Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anomaly detection in online social networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1608.00301 v1 pith:KLJXI547 submitted 2016-08-01 cs.SI physics.soc-ph

classification cs.SIphysics.soc-ph
keywords anomaliesonlinenetworkssocialdetectionanomalybehaviourdetecting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Anomalies in online social networks can signify irregular, and often illegal behaviour. Anomalies in online social networks can signify irregular, and often illegal behaviour. Detection of such anomalies has been used to identify malicious individuals, including spammers, sexual predators, and online fraudsters. In this paper we survey existing computational techniques for detecting anomalies in online social networks. We characterise anomalies as being either static or dynamic, and as being labelled or unlabelled, and survey methods for detecting these different types of anomalies. We suggest that the detection of anomalies in online social networks is composed of two sub-processes; the selection and calculation of network features, and the classification of observations from this feature space. In addition, this paper provides an overview of the types of problems that anomaly detection can address and identifies key areas of future research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph Evidential Learning for Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GEL detects anomalous nodes by scoring evidential uncertainty from feature and topology reconstruction, reporting gains on four of five benchmark datasets.

Pith tools