Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 96 references

Asteroseismology of four eccentric double-lined spectroscopic eclipsing binaries

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Using eclipses as spatial filters, the paper assigns every detected pulsation to a specific component of four eccentric binaries, classifying three delta Scuti, one gamma Dor, and two hybrid pulsators.

desk verdict Solid four-system study that gets three of four pulsation attributions right; the CX Phe 'both delta Sct' claim is internally inconsistent and over-sold in the abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14395 v1 pith:KM6CC4GJ submitted 2025-06-17 astro-ph.SR

Alexios Liakos This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords eclipsingbinariesdeltaScutistarsgammaDoradushybridpulsatorsTESSphotometryradialvelocitieseclipsetimingvariationsapsidalmotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to determine, for four eccentric double-lined eclipsing binaries, which component pulsates and with what frequencies, and to pin down each pulsator's mass, radius, and evolutionary state. It models TESS light curves together with radial velocities from Gaia and ground-based observations, Fourier-analyzes the residuals, and uses the eclipses themselves as spatial filters to separate the pulsation signal of one star from the other. Its central result is a set of component-resolved classifications: CH Ind's primary is a $\gamma$ Dor star and its secondary a $\delta$ Sct star, V577 Oph's primary is a hybrid $\delta$ Sct-$\gamma$ Dor pulsator, both components of CX Phe are $\delta$ Sct stars, and TIC 35481236's secondary is a hybrid pulsator. An eclipse-timing analysis of V577 Oph additionally yields an apsidal-motion period near 5000 years and evidence for a third body of at least $0.5\,M_\odot$. Such classifications matter because only about 35 detached double-lined eclipsing binaries have well-measured absolute parameters for their pulsating components, so these six pulsators expand that sparse sample by roughly 14 percent.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the use of an eclipse as a spatial filter. Because the two stars in each system are similar in brightness and temperature, a primary or secondary eclipse blocks a comparable amount of light from one component; frequencies whose amplitudes weaken during a given eclipse are assigned to the star being covered, while frequencies that survive are assigned to the uncovered star. The frequency extraction itself is a classical prewhitening Fourier analysis of the out-of-eclipse residuals, with a signal-to-noise threshold near 5, followed by computation of the pulsation constant $Q$ from each frequency and the star's absolute parameters, and comparison with published $Q$ models to assign radial, non-radial, fundamental, or overtone modes. The absolute parameters that feed into $Q$ come from light-curve modeling of the TESS data with the mass ratio fixed by the radial-velocity semi-amplitudes.

What would settle it

Re-measure both components' radial-velocity curves with independent high-resolution spectra and recompute the masses, radii, and Q-values; if the new semi-amplitudes differ from the adopted K values by more than the quoted errors, the pulsation-mode identifications would need to be revised.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that eclipses can serve as a spatial filter even when they are partial: by comparing the Fourier spectra of in-eclipse and out-of-eclipse light, each system's pulsation frequencies can be assigned to a specific star. CH Ind is found to host two pulsators of different classes, a $\gamma$ Dor primary with dominant frequency $f_2 = 2.7486\,\mathrm{d}^{-1}$ and a $\delta$ Sct secondary with $f_1 = 8.8527\,\mathrm{d}^{-1}$, the latter identified as a non-radial fundamental mode. V577 Oph's primary is a hybrid: $f_1 = 14.3903\,\mathrm{d}^{-1}$ is a radial fundamental $\delta$ Sct mode and $f_3 = 1.5426\,\mathrm{d}^{-1}$ is a $\gamma$ Dor-type $g$ mode. In CX Phe both stars pulsate as $\delta$ Sct stars, the primary with three independent frequencies at 14.50, 15.46, and 17.31 $\mathrm{d}^{-1}$, the secondary with modes at 5.19 and 7.22 $\mathrm{d}^{-1}$. TIC 35481236's secondary is a hybrid $\delta$ Sct-$\gamma$ Dor star with independent frequencies at 1.79, 20.74, and 24.98 $\mathrm{d}^{-1}$. For V577 Oph the paper also establishes a roughly 5000-year apsidal-motion period and a light-travel-time modulation consistent with a third body of minimal mass $0.5\,M_\odot$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the radial-velocity semi-amplitudes used to fix each system's mass ratio are accurate; for one system the paper substitutes ground-based values for a satellite measurement it considers wrong, and for another its derived masses differ from the automatic satellite solution by about 11.5 percent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The sample of detached double-lined eclipsing binaries with well-measured $\delta$ Sct components grows by about 14 percent, giving the empirical $P_{\rm orb}$--$P_{\rm puls}$ and $f$--$\log g$ relations more leverage.
  • CH Ind becomes a rare benchmark: two stars of nearly equal mass, radius, and temperature in the same binary occupy different pulsation classes, $\gamma$ Dor versus $\delta$ Sct, so the pair can test what controls the transition between those instability regions.
  • V577 Oph's apsidal motion with a period of about 5000 years and a 33-year periodic modulation imply a third body of at least $0.5\,M_\odot$ that is too faint to appear in the light curve.
  • The hybrid pulsators in V577 Oph and TIC 35481236 add data points inside the overlap region of the $\delta$ Sct and $\gamma$ Dor instability strips, where both $p$ and $g$ modes can be observed.
  • CX Phe's components sit off single-star evolutionary tracks, which the paper interprets as past mass exchange or mass loss; if true, its pulsation frequencies must be modeled in a binary-evolution context rather than as isolated stellar oscillations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same eclipse-as-spatial-filter logic could be applied to the hundreds of eclipsing binaries whose pulsations are currently unattributed, even single-lined systems, to assign frequencies to components without waiting for a total eclipse.
  • CH Ind's near-twin components belonging to different pulsation classes suggests that a small structural difference, such as rotation, tidal deformation, or a slight composition offset, tips a star between $\gamma$ Dor and $\delta$ Sct pulsation; asteroseismic modeling of the two stars could identify which parameter matters.
  • The 11.5 percent mass discrepancy between this fit and the automatic satellite solution for CX Phe hints that eccentric SB2 systems may have systematically offset automated masses; checking the offset against orbital eccentricity in a larger sample would test that.
  • The $0.014\,\mathrm{d}^{-1}$ signal in TIC 35481236, dismissed as an artifact, corresponds to a 71-day timescale; a few more TESS sectors would show whether it is a real low-frequency mode, an instrumental effect, or an alias.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes TESS photometry and Gaia/ground-based radial velocities for four eccentric detached double-lined spectroscopic eclipsing binaries (CH Ind, V577 Oph, CX Phe, and TIC 35481236). It models the light curves with PHOEBE/Wilson-Devinney, derives absolute masses, radii, and luminosities, performs Fourier analyses of the light-curve residuals, and uses eclipses as spatial filters to attribute pulsation frequencies to individual components. The main claims are that CH Ind hosts a gamma Dor primary and a delta Sct secondary, V577 Oph hosts a hybrid delta Sct-gamma Dor primary, both CX Phe components are delta Sct stars, and TIC 35481236 hosts a hybrid delta Sct-gamma Dor secondary. The paper also presents an eclipse-timing-variation analysis for V577 Oph, obtaining apsidal motion parameters and a low-mass third body, and compares the delta Sct components with published samples in orbital-period, evolutionary, and mass-radius diagrams.

Significance. If the component attributions and absolute parameters are correct, this is a valuable contribution: it adds four well-characterized SB2+E systems with pulsating components, where eclipse light-curve modelling plus frequency analysis can constrain which star pulsates and at which mode. The paper supplies extensive frequency tables, Q-mode identifications, evolutionary diagrams, and comparisons with existing samples, and it is transparent about many data-selection choices. The spatial-filter method is a useful approach for systems without total eclipses. However, the central component-attribution claim is not equally secure for all four systems: the CX Phe attribution is internally inconsistent, and because the absolute parameters scale directly from adopted RV semi-amplitudes, the mode identifications inherit any systematic error in those K values. With the CX Phe issue repaired, the paper would make a solid contribution; as it stands, the headline claim about both CX Phe components being delta Sct stars is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [6.3, Table 6] The assignment of f4 to the CX Phe secondary is not supported by the paper's own spatial-filter criterion. The text states that f2, f3, f4, and f5 are amplified during the secondary eclipse and uses this amplification to assign f2, f3, and f5 to the primary, but f4 is assigned to the secondary solely on the basis of the f1/f4 ratio of about 0.72. That ratio argument presumes that both frequencies originate from the same star, which is exactly the point at issue, so it cannot override the observed amplification. The paper also states that f1 'remains almost intact' during the secondary eclipse, rather than showing the decrease expected if f1 originated from the eclipsed secondary, and it concedes that no total eclipses occur and that the primary-eclipse analysis for CX Phe was unreliable. Therefore the abstract's definitive statement that both CX Phe components are delta Sct stars is not established, and the Section 7 summary counts and the comparison samples inherit this uncertainty.
  2. [3-4, Tables 2-3] All absolute masses, radii, luminosities, and hence the Q values used for mode identification are derived from the adopted K semi-amplitudes, but no RV curves or direct RV fits are shown in the paper. The input K values are heterogeneous: Gaia NSS values are used for three systems and Jeffery et al. (2017) values for V577 Oph, and the paper reports discrepancies of 10.9-11.7% for the CX Phe masses and 21.6% for the V577 Oph secondary mass against Gaia. Since Table 6's l-degree identifications and the positions of stars in Figures 2, 6, and 7 depend on these absolute parameters, a systematic error in any single adopted K value would propagate into the pulsational mode classification. Showing the RV fits, or at least quantitatively propagating the K uncertainties into Q and l, would materially strengthen the central claim.
  3. [5, Table 4] The claimed LITE third body around V577 Oph needs a stronger statistical justification. The fit uses approximately 20 photoelectric and CCD minima spanning roughly 70 years, with a derived third-body period of 33 years that is comparable to the usable baseline, and the 1928-1964 photographic minima are discarded without a quantitative sensitivity test. A bootstrap analysis, a residual periodogram, or a false-alarm estimate would help demonstrate that the 0.013-day LITE amplitude and the 0.50 solar-mass minimum mass are not an artifact of the few points and the chosen weighting.
minor comments (4)
  1. [7] There are several typographical errors, including 'pulsatots' in Section 7, 'agrement' in Section 7, and 'photoeletcric' in Section 5; these should be corrected in the revised version.
  2. [6.3] The abstract states definitively that both components of CX Phe are delta Sct stars, while Section 6.3 itself says that for f4 'the origin star cannot be determined with absolute certainty.' The abstract and the summary counts in Section 7 should be aligned with the actual degree of confidence expressed in the analysis.
  3. [6.4, Table C.1] For TIC 35481236, f2 is labeled as an artifact in the text but is still listed in Table C.1 with '???' as its combination; the table caption or a footnote should make clear whether this frequency is part of the final pulsation model.
  4. [4] The 42% distance discrepancy for V577 Oph is attributed to a possible error in the adopted BCTESS value, but no quantitative test is given; a short paragraph exploring the sensitivity of the derived distance to BCTESS or extinction would make the discussion more complete.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the binary, pulsation, and mode-identification chains are independent of their own outputs; self-citations provide methods and comparison samples but are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external data and external benchmarks. Mass ratios are computed from published RV semi-amplitudes (q = K1/K2; Table 2, Sect. 3), and absolute masses, radii, and luminosities follow from the LC model plus these K values via AbsParEB; none of these quantities is defined in terms of the pulsation results. Frequencies are extracted by iterative Fourier prewhitening of the LC residuals (Sect. 6) with an S/N threshold around 5, and mode identifications are made by comparing computed Q values with the external Fitch (1981) models. Component attribution uses the eclipses as spatial filters, a geometric argument that does not presuppose the final classification. The V577 Oph third-body and apsidal-motion parameters are fitted to ETV residuals and are presented as detections, not as predictions, so they cannot reduce to their own inputs. The paper's self-citations (Liakos 2017 for the S/N method; Liakos & Niarchos 2017, Liakos 2020, 2025 for catalogues and comparison correlations) are used for methodology and for placing the new systems in context; the four systems' newly derived parameters do not depend on those catalogued values. The skeptical concern about CX Phe's f4 attribution is a consistency/correctness issue internal to the spatial-filter interpretation, not a circularity: the paper itself concedes that no total eclipses occur and that the primary-eclipse analysis for CX Phe was not reliable, but that concession does not make any claimed result equivalent to its input by construction. Overall, no circular step can be exhibited from the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central results depend on adopted RV semi-amplitudes K from Gaia NSS or Jeffery et al. (2017), primary temperatures fixed from literature, the eclipse-as-spatial-filter assumption, and standard Q-value mode identification. These are reasonable domain assumptions but are not independently verified within the paper.

free parameters (3)
  • Primary effective temperatures Teff,1 (four systems) = 6900, 7000, 7000, 7400 K for CH Ind, V577 Oph, CX Phe, TIC 35481236
    Adopted from Verberne et al. (2024) for the first two and averaged catalogues for the last two; held fixed during light curve modeling with an assumed 200 K error, and they set the luminosity and evolutionary placement.
  • Secondary effective temperatures Teff,2 = 6908, 6901, 6478, 7463 K
    Fitted in PHOEBE with the primaries fixed; the temperature differences drive the luminosity ratio and the distance modulus.
  • V577 Oph apsidal motion and LITE parameters = U about 4956 yr, omega_dot = 0.0012 deg/cycle, P3 = 33 yr, A = 0.013 d, e3 = 0.28, M3,min = 0.50 solar masses
    Fitted to 20 minima; the 33 yr period spans only about 1.5 cycles of the 1928-2025 baseline, so the third-body amplitude is a tentative fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Gaia NSS (or Jeffery et al. 2017 for V577 Oph) RV semi-amplitudes K are correct and set q = K1/K2 and the absolute mass scale.
    Used in Section 3 and Table 2; if wrong, masses scale as K^3 and radii and luminosities shift.
  • domain assumption Primary effective temperatures fixed from catalogues are accurate to about 200 K.
    Section 3 states a reasonable error in Teff,1 of 200 K was assumed; these temperatures drive luminosities and the HR-diagram placement.
  • domain assumption Eclipses act as clean spatial filters that separate the pulsation origin.
    Section 6 uses in-eclipse versus out-of-eclipse amplitude comparisons; for partial eclipses with short durations the separation is coarse.
  • domain assumption Q values computed with Breger (2000) and compared to Fitch (1981) identify radial versus non-radial modes.
    Section 6; standard in the field but sensitive to the absolute parameters that depend on K and Teff.
  • domain assumption All components rotate synchronously with the orbital frequency (F = 1.0).
    Section 6 interprets combination frequencies using the orbital frequency forb; an asynchronous rotator would change the sidelobe assignments.
invented entities (1)
  • Third body around V577 Oph with minimum mass 0.50 solar masses independent evidence
    purpose: Explains the about 33 yr periodic modulation of eclipse timings after removing apsidal motion; too faint (0.6 percent light) for direct detection.
    The LITE fit gives falsifiable parameters (P3 = 33 yr, amplitude 0.013 d, e3 = 0.28) that could be tested with radial velocities, Gaia astrometry, or future minima. It is still an inference from residuals, and the baseline covers only about 1.5 cycles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asteroseismology of four eccentric double-lined spectroscopic eclipsing binaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KM6CC4GJ

@misc{pith2026250614395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asteroseismology of four eccentric double-lined spectroscopic eclipsing binaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KM6CC4GJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14395}
}
abstract

Photometric data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission and radial velocities from the Gaia mission and ground-based observations were used to model the light curves and calculate the physical parameters of the eccentric eclipsing systems CH Ind, V577 Oph, CX Phe, and TIC 35481236. The components of these systems have temperatures between 6450 and 7500 K, masses between 1.4 and 1.85 solar masses, and radii between 1.49 and 3.05 solar radii. The residuals of these models were further analyzed using the Fourier method to reveal the pulsational frequencies of their oscillating components. Due to the similarity of the components of each system, the eclipses were used as spatial filters in order to determine which member is the pulsating star. CH Ind was found to pulsate in 46 frequencies; its primary component is a $\gamma$ Dor star and the secondary a $\delta$ Sct star. The primary component of V577 Oph oscillates in both the regimes of $\gamma$ Dor and $\delta$ Sct stars. Moreover, using past timings of minima, an eclipse timing variation analysis was also performed for V577 Oph, resulting in the calculation of the apsidal motion parameters and the existence of a third body around the system. Both components of CX Phe were found to be $\delta$ Sct stars; its primary has three independent frequencies in the range of 14.5-17.4 d$^{-1}$ and its secondary has two main modes of 5.19 and 7.22 d$^{-1}$. The analysis of TIC 35481236 indicates the hybrid $\delta$ Sct-$\gamma$ Dor nature of its secondary component. The physical and pulsational properties of the $\delta$ Sct stars of these systems were compared with those of other $\delta$ Sct stars-members of binaries in evolutionary diagrams.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14395 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. T ES S phased (black points) and synthetic (red lines) light curves and residuals of the binary modelling (lower panels–red points) of all studied cases. reported in recent catalogues (Sec. 1.1). Similarly to the previ￾ous two cases, the components of TIC 35481236 have very sim￾ilar temperatures. The average of the Teff values of the various catalogues is ∼ 7400 K, which is, again, plausible for assign￾ing it to the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hertzsprung–Russell (top panel) and mass–radius (bot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fitting of apsidal motion curves (black and blue solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Periodograms of the out-of-eclipse data points (left panels) and the in-eclipse data points (right panels) of all systems studied. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fourier fit on sample of data points of all studied cases. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Porb −Ppuls correlation for δ Sct stars of detached systems (star symbols) and the locations of the δ Scuti components of the studied systems. Black solid line represents the linear fitting of Liakos (2025). We note that this correlation extends up to Porb = 13 d [PIT…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: f − log g plot for δ Sct stars-members of binary systems with Porb < 13 d (grey star symbols) and Porb > 13 d (black diamond symbols) and the locations of the δ Sct components of the studied cases (filled and empty colored circles). We note that the primaries of CX Phe…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    Aerts , C., Christensen-Dalsgaard , J., & Kurtz , D. W. 2010, Asteroseismology (Springer Netherlands)

    2010

  4. [4]

    Anders , F., Khalatyan , A., Queiroz , A. B. A., et al. 2022, , 658, A91

    2022

  5. [5]

    2014, , 796, 118

    Antoci , V., Cunha , M., Houdek , G., et al. 2014, , 796, 118

    2014

  6. [6]

    Bailer-Jones , C. A. L., Rybizki , J., Fouesneau , M., Demleitner , M., & Andrae , R. 2021, , 161, 147

    2021

  7. [7]

    A., Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J., & Pamyatnykh , A

    Balona , L. A., Daszy \'n ska-Daszkiewicz , J., & Pamyatnykh , A. A. 2015, , 452, 3073

    2015

  8. [8]

    S., Koen , C., & Pokrzywka , B

    Baran , A. S., Koen , C., & Pokrzywka , B. 2015, , 448, L16

    2015

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    J., Koch , D., Basri , G., et al

    Borucki , W. J., Koch , D., Basri , G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977

    2010

  2. [10]

    Bowman , D. M. & Kurtz , D. W. 2018, , 476, 3169

    2018

  3. [11]

    Bowman , D. M. & Michielsen , M. 2021, , 656, A158

    2021

  4. [12]

    2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Breger , M. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger & M. Montgomery , 3

    2000

  5. [13]

    2018, , 618, A20

    Claret , A. 2018, , 618, A20

    2018

  6. [14]

    L., Telting , J., Belmonte , J

    Creevey , O. L., Telting , J., Belmonte , J. A., et al. 2010, Astronomische Nachrichten, 331, 952

    2010

  7. [15]

    2018, , 616, A5

    Cropper , M., Katz , D., Sartoretti , P., et al. 2018, , 616, A5

    2018

  8. [16]

    1993, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 3894

    Diethelm , R. 1993, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 3894

    1993

  9. [17]

    J., Bayliss , D., Rodel , T., & Kunovac , V

    Doyle , L., Armstrong , D. J., Bayliss , D., Rodel , T., & Kunovac , V. 2024, , 529, 1802

    2024

  10. [18]

    A., Grigahc \`e ne , A., Garrido , R., Gabriel , M., & Scuflaire , R

    Dupret , M. A., Grigahc \`e ne , A., Garrido , R., Gabriel , M., & Scuflaire , R. 2005, , 435, 927

    2005

  11. [19]

    2023, , 268, 4

    Fetherolf , T., Pepper , J., Simpson , E., et al. 2023, , 268, 4

    2023

  12. [20]

    Fitch , W. S. 1981, , 249, 218

    1981

  13. [21]

    A., Lindegren , L., et al

    Gaia Collaboration , Klioner , S. A., Lindegren , L., et al. 2022, , 667, A148

    2022

  14. [22]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, , 595, A1

    2016

  15. [23]

    Gaia Collaboration , Vallenari , A., Brown , A. G. A., et al. 2023, , 674, A1

    2023

  16. [24]

    2000, , 141, 371

    Girardi , L., Bressan , A., Bertelli , G., & Chiosi , C. 2000, , 141, 371

    2000

  17. [25]

    2010, , 713, L192

    Grigahc \`e ne , A., Antoci , V., Balona , L., et al. 2010, , 713, L192

    2010

  18. [26]

    1988, Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires, 35, 15

    Hagedus , T. 1988, Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires, 35, 15

    1988

  19. [27]

    & Shobbrook , R

    Handler , G. & Shobbrook , R. R. 2002, , 333, 251

    2002

  20. [28]

    W., Fekel , F

    Henry , G. W., Fekel , F. C., & Henry , S. M. 2007, , 133, 1421

    2007

  21. [29]

    1935, Astronomische Nachrichten, 255, 401

    Hoffmeister , C. 1935, Astronomische Nachrichten, 255, 401

    1935

  22. [30]

    Irwin , J. B. 1959, , 64, 149

    1959

  23. [31]

    J., Barnes , III, T

    Jeffery , E. J., Barnes , III, T. G., Skillen , I., & Montemayor , T. J. 2017, , 154, 127

    2017

  24. [32]

    2017, , 470, 915

    Kahraman Ali c avu s , F., Soydugan , E., Smalley , B., & Kub \'a t , J. 2017, , 470, 915

    2017

  25. [33]

    G., C elik , E., et al

    Kahraman Ali c avu s , F., C oban , C . G., C elik , E., et al. 2023, , 524, 619

    2023

  26. [34]

    B., Handler , G., Krisciunas , K., Poretti , E., & Zerbi , F

    Kaye , A. B., Handler , G., Krisciunas , K., Poretti , E., & Zerbi , F. M. 1999, , 111, 840

    1999

  27. [35]

    2022, , 657, A7

    Kervella , P., Arenou , F., & Th \'e venin , F. 2022, , 657, A7

    2022

  28. [36]

    2024, , 691, A98

    Khalatyan , A., Anders , F., Chiappini , C., et al. 2024, , 691, A98

    2024

  29. [37]

    W., Lee , C.-U., et al

    Kim , S.-L., Lee , J. W., Lee , C.-U., et al. 2021, , 162, 212

    2021

  30. [38]

    G., Borucki , W

    Koch , D. G., Borucki , W. J., Basri , G., et al. 2010, , 713, L79

    2010

  31. [39]

    S., Kusakin , A

    Kozyreva , V. S., Kusakin , A. V., Krajci , T., & Bogomazov , A. I. 2019, Astrophysical Bulletin, 74, 424

    2019

  32. [40]

    2017, , 153, 75

    Kunder , A., Kordopatis , G., Steinmetz , M., et al. 2017, , 153, 75

    2017

  33. [41]

    W., Handler , G., Rappaport , S

    Kurtz , D. W., Handler , G., Rappaport , S. A., et al. 2020, , 494, 5118

    2020

  34. [42]

    Kwee , K. K. & van Woerden , H. 1956, , 12, 327

    1956

  35. [43]

    & Breger , M

    Lenz , P. & Breger , M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

    2005

  36. [44]

    2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Liakos , A. 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 496, Living Together: Planets, Host Stars and Binaries, ed. S. M. Rucinski , G. Torres , & M. Zejda , 286

    2015

  37. [45]

    2017, , 607, A85

    Liakos , A. 2017, , 607, A85

    2017

  38. [46]

    2020, , 642, A91

    Liakos , A. 2020, , 642, A91

    2020

  39. [47]

    2025, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 55, 172

    Liakos , A. 2025, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 55, 172

    2025

  40. [48]

    Liakos , A., Moriarty , D. J. W., Blackford , M. G., et al. 2022, , 663, A137

    2022

  41. [49]

    Liakos , A., Moriarty , D. J. W., Erdem , A., West , J. F., & Evans , P. 2024, , 691, A260

    2024

  42. [50]

    & Niarchos , P

    Liakos , A. & Niarchos , P. 2015, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 496, Living Together: Planets, Host Stars and Binaries, ed. S. M. Rucinski , G. Torres , & M. Zejda , 195

    2015

  43. [51]

    & Niarchos , P

    Liakos , A. & Niarchos , P. 2016, in 12th Hellenic Astronomical Conference

    2016

  44. [52]

    & Niarchos , P

    Liakos , A. & Niarchos , P. 2017, , 465, 1181

    2017

  45. [53]

    & Niarchos , P

    Liakos , A. & Niarchos , P. 2020, Galaxies, 8, 75

    2020

  46. [54]

    2012, , 422, 1250

    Liakos , A., Niarchos , P., Soydugan , E., & Zasche , P. 2012, , 422, 1250

    2012

  47. [55]

    Loumos , G. L. & Deeming , T. J. 1978, , 56, 285

    1978

  48. [56]

    Lucy , L. B. 1967, , 65, 89

    1967

  49. [57]

    A., & Boyer , M

    McDonald , I., Zijlstra , A. A., & Boyer , M. L. 2012, , 427, 343

    2012

  50. [58]

    2022, Galaxies, 10, 97

    Mkrtichian , D., Gunsriviwat , K., Lehmann , H., et al. 2022, Galaxies, 10, 97

    2022

  51. [59]

    E., Kusakin , A

    Mkrtichian , D. E., Kusakin , A. V., Gamarova , A. Y., & Nazarenko , V. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 259, IAU Colloq. 185: Radial and Nonradial Pulsationsn as Probes of Stellar Physics, ed. C. Aerts , T. R. Bedding , & J. Christensen-Dal...

    2002

  52. [60]

    2016, , 463, 4210

    Nascimbeni , V., Piotto , G., Ortolani , S., et al. 2016, , 463, 4210

    2016

  53. [61]

    2005, Batch Minima

    Nelson, R. 2005, Batch Minima

    2005

  54. [62]

    A., & Kinemuchi , K

    Oaster , L., Smith , H. A., & Kinemuchi , K. 2006, , 118, 405

    2006

  55. [63]

    Otero , S. A. 2003, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5480, 1

    2003

  56. [64]

    G., Collins , K

    Paegert , M., Stassun , K. G., Collins , K. A., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.04778

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    2015, , 580, A23

    Paunzen , E. 2015, , 580, A23

    2015

  58. [66]

    B., et al

    Paxton , B., Schwab , J., Bauer , E. B., et al. 2018, , 234, 34

    2018

  59. [67]

    1997, , 47, 467

    Pojmanski , G. 1997, , 47, 467

    1997

  60. [68]

    & Zwitter , T

    Pr s a , A. & Zwitter , T. 2005, , 628, 426

    2005

  61. [69]

    2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 001

    Qian , S.-B., Li , L.-J., He , J.-J., et al. 2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 001

    2019

  62. [70]

    2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249

    Rauer , H., Catala , C., Aerts , C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249

    2014

  63. [71]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker , G. R., Winn , J. N., Vanderspek , R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003

    2015

  64. [72]

    Ruci \'n ski , S. M. 1969, , 19, 245

    1969

  65. [73]

    J., Huber , D., et al

    Schofield , M., Chaplin , W. J., Huber , D., et al. 2019, , 241, 12

    2019

  66. [74]

    2022, , 259, 50

    Shi , X.-d., Qian , S.-b., & Li , L.-J. 2022, , 259, 50

    2022

  67. [75]

    Shugarov , S. Y. 1985, Astronomicheskij Tsirkulyar, 1359, 4

    1985

  68. [76]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.17068

    Southworth , J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.17068

    2025 arXiv

  69. [77]

    C., & Demircan , O

    Soydugan , E., \.I bano g lu , C., Soydugan , F., Akan , M. C., & Demircan , O. 2006 a , , 366, 1289

    2006

  70. [78]

    2006 b , , 370, 2013

    Soydugan , E., Soydugan , F., Demircan , O., & \.I bano g lu , C. 2006 b , , 370, 2013

    2006

  71. [79]

    G., Oelkers , R

    Stassun , K. G., Oelkers , R. J., Paegert , M., et al. 2019, , 158, 138

    2019

  72. [80]

    J., et al

    Steinmetz , M., Guiglion , G., McMillan , P. J., et al. 2020, , 160, 83

    2020

  73. [81]

    J., Stassun , K

    Stevens , D. J., Stassun , K. G., & Gaudi , B. S. 2017, , 154, 259

    2017

  74. [82]

    1966, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 120, 1

    Strohmeier , W., Fischer , H., & Ott , H. 1966, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 120, 1

    1966

  75. [83]

    1965, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 107, 1

    Strohmeier , W., Knigge , R., & Ott , H. 1965, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 107, 1

    1965

  76. [84]

    L., Denneau , L., Flewelling , H., et al

    Tonry , J. L., Denneau , L., Flewelling , H., et al. 2018, , 867, 105

    2018

  77. [85]

    2022, , 659, A95

    Tsantaki , M., Pancino , E., Marrese , P., et al. 2022, , 659, A95

    2022

  78. [86]

    2011, , 534, A125

    Uytterhoeven , K., Moya , A., Grigahc \`e ne , A., et al. 2011, , 534, A125

    2011

  79. [87]

    E., Rossi , E

    Verberne , S., Koposov , S. E., Rossi , E. M., et al. 2024, , 684, A29

    2024

  80. [88]

    & Volkova , N

    Volkov , I. & Volkova , N. 2010, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 435, Binaries - Key to Comprehension of the Universe, ed. A. Pr s a & M. Zejda , 323

    2010

  81. [89]

    Volkov , I. M. 1990, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 3493

    1990

  82. [90]

    1924, , 84, 665

    von Zeipel , H. 1924, , 84, 665

    1924

  83. [91]

    B., Kaye , A

    Warner , P. B., Kaye , A. B., & Guzik , J. A. 2003, , 593, 1049

    2003

  84. [92]

    Wilson , R. E. & Devinney , E. J. 1971, , 166, 605

    1971

  85. [93]

    2009, , 14, 121

    Zasche , P., Liakos , A., Niarchos , P., et al. 2009, , 14, 121

    2009

  86. [94]

    2013, , 777, 77

    Zhang , X.-B., Luo , C.-Q., & Fu , J.-N. 2013, , 777, 77

    2013

  87. [95]

    Zhevakin , S. A. 1963, , 1, 367

    1963

  88. [96]

    2001, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5087

    Zhou , A.-Y. 2001, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 5087

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.