Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Stochastic PDEs with correlated, non-stationary Stratonovich noise of Dean--Kawasaki type

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dean–Kawasaki with square-root noise now has unique solutions

desk verdict Solid extension of the kinetic-solution framework to square-root Dean–Kawasaki noise, with genuinely new log-regularity estimates, but the boundary non-vanishing proof contains a real—and repairable—error in inequality (79). read the letter →

arxiv 2504.18370 v1 pith:KMCPEERE submitted 2025-04-25 math.PR math.AP

Benjamin Fehrman This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath.AP MSC 35Q8460F1060H1560K3582B21
keywords conservativeSPDEDean–KawasakiequationstochastickineticsolutionStratonovichnoisesquare-rootnon-stationarylogarithmicregularizationNeumannboundarycondition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

One case resisted the author's earlier theory with Gess: conservative stochastic PDEs combining non-stationary Stratonovich noise with square-root nonlinearities, such as the inhomogeneous Dean–Kawasaki equation $\partial_t\rho = \nabla\cdot(a(x)\nabla\varphi(\rho)) - \nabla\cdot(\sqrt{\rho}\circ s(x)\,d\xi)$ with Neumann boundary conditions. The paper proves that this equation is well posed: for every nonnegative initial density $\rho_0\in L^1(\Omega;L^1(U))$ there exists a unique stochastic kinetic solution, and any two solutions satisfy an $L^1(U)$ contraction in time. The engine is a Stratonovich-to-Itô correction term proportional to $\langle\xi\rangle_1 \nabla\cdot(a\nabla\log\rho)$, whose logarithmic structure is shown to give a genuine time-averaged regularization: on the event that the initial mass is positive, $\log\rho$ is space-time integrable and the set where $\rho=0$ has zero measure. A careful reader would care because this is the natural SPDE for density fluctuations of diffusive particle systems in inhomogeneous media, and the well-posedness closes the square-root gap in the existing theory.

What carries the argument

The key object is the stochastic kinetic solution: a nonnegative density $\rho$ whose kinetic function $\chi_t(x,\eta)=1_{\{0<\eta<\rho(x,t)\}}$ satisfies an entropy inequality quantified by a nonnegative kinetic defect measure $q$. The argument is carried by the Stratonovich-to-Itô correction, which in Itô form replaces the naive log term with $\frac{\langle\xi\rangle_1}{8}\nabla\cdot(a\nabla\log\rho) + \frac{\langle\xi\rangle_1}{4}\nabla\cdot(1_{\{\rho>0\}}s(\nabla\cdot s^t))$. The paper's load-bearing mechanism is the regularization estimate of Proposition 2.14, which proves that $\log\rho$ is space-time integrable even when the initial data is only $L^1$; that fact yields the non-vanishing dichotomy and lets the uniqueness proof remove cutoffs near $\rho=0$ and near $\rho=\infty$ using Proposition 2.6 and the vanishing-at-infinity of the kinetic measure.

What would settle it

Take the deterministic heat equation (the case $\langle\xi\rangle_1=0$) in a ball with initial data $1_{B_{1/2}}$ and check whether $\log\rho$ is integrable over space and time; direct calculation shows it is not, so a single numerical or analytic verification that the same estimate holds only when $\langle\xi\rangle_1>0$ would settle the role of the noise. Concretely, one could compute the left side of estimate (10) for a family of regularized square-root approximations with $\langle\xi\rangle_1$ approaching zero and watch the logarithmic term diverge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a dichotomy that tames the discontinuous coefficient $1_{\{\rho>0\}}$ in the Itô form (4). The paper shows that any stochastic kinetic solution is either identically zero (on the event $\rho_0=0$) or positive almost everywhere, in the interior and on the boundary in the sense of trace. This follows from new estimates—entropy, $H^{-1}$ regularity, and Hölder regularity of the time-averaged logarithmic flux—that imply $\log\rho$ is integrable and that the set where $\rho=0$ has zero $(d+1)$-dimensional and boundary $d$-dimensional measure. With the dichotomy in hand, the uniqueness proof can pass through the singularity $\rho=0$ by treating $1_{\{\rho>0\}}$ as the constant function, and existence follows by taking smooth approximations $\sigma_n(\rho)\to\sqrt{\rho}$ and passing to the kinetic limit. The paper states the result as: under Assumptions 2.1 and 2.2, for every $\rho_0\in L^1(\Omega;L^1(U))$ there exists a unique stochastic kinetic solution, and $\max_{t\in[0,T]}\|\rho_1(t)-\rho_2(t)\|_{L^1(U)} \leq \|\rho_{0,1}-\rho_{0,2}\|_{L^1(U)}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the noise has strictly positive, spatially constant quadratic variation $\langle\xi\rangle_1>0$ and that the diffusion $\varphi$ is uniformly nondegenerate; if $\langle\xi\rangle_1=0$, the logarithmic correction term vanishes and with it the regularization that keeps solutions away from the vacuum set $\{\rho=0\}$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the theorem is right, the inhomogeneous Dean–Kawasaki equation with square-root noise and Neumann boundary conditions has a complete well-posedness theory, including the $L^1(U)$ contraction that makes solutions depend continuously on their initial data.
  • The same methods extend, as the paper states in Remark 2.19, to more general noise coefficients satisfying the standing assumptions, and to degenerate diffusions such as porous media nonlinearities $\varphi(\rho)=\rho^m$ for $m\in(0,\infty)$.
  • The quantitative estimates of Propositions 2.14–2.16 become available; they give explicit control of $\log\rho$ and of the Hölder regularity of the time-averaged flux $L(\rho)_t=\int_0^t(\varphi(\rho)+\frac{\langle\xi\rangle_1}{8}\log\rho-\mathrm{mean})\,dr$ in $H^1(U)$.
  • The non-vanishing dichotomy implies that solutions built from positive initial mass never develop a macroscopic vacuum, so the coefficient $1_{\{\rho>0\}}$ is almost surely constant and the equation's Itô form is almost surely smooth in that respect.
  • Mass is preserved exactly: $\|\rho(\cdot,t)\|_{L^1(U)}=\|\rho_0\|_{L^1(U)}$ almost surely, which is the property needed if $\rho$ is to describe empirical densities of diffusing particles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I would expect the same logarithmic regularization to operate for other conservative SPDEs whose noise coefficient vanishes like $\sqrt{\rho}$ at zero, including equations with rough or white-in-space noise after renormalization, because the mechanism is the sign of the correction term rather than the smoothness of the noise.
  • The dichotomy suggests a practical simplification for simulation: once positivity is established from the estimates, numerical schemes can drop the indicator function in the Itô correction and track $\log\rho$ directly, avoiding the discontinuous coefficient that complicates discretizations.
  • A testable extension is whether the time-averaged regularity of $L(\rho)$ holds in the Klimontovich regime (the $\theta=1$ case) and fails in the Itô regime ($\theta=0$), since the paper shows the equation is not uniformly parabolic there; checking this numerically would separate the role of the Stratonovich correction from mere noise smoothing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves well-posedness for a conservative stochastic PDE (the inhomogeneous Dean–Kawasaki equation) with correlated, non-stationary Stratonovich noise and square-root noise coefficient, on a smooth bounded domain with Neumann boundary conditions. The solution concept is a stochastic kinetic solution (Definition 2.4), and the main results are uniqueness and pathwise L1-contraction (Theorem 2.8) and existence for L1(Ω;L1(U)) initial data (Theorem 2.18). The novelty is a logarithmic regularization: the Stratonovich-to-Itô correction produces estimates that make log ρ integrable and give time-averaged H1 regularity, which in turn yields a dichotomy: on the event that the initial data are nonzero, the solution is almost everywhere positive both in U×[0,T] and, in trace sense, on ∂U×[0,T]. This dichotomy is used to handle the discontinuous coefficient 1_{ρ>0} in the uniqueness proof.

Significance. If the proof is completed as intended, this is a substantial contribution: it resolves a case explicitly left open by Fehrman and Gess [27], namely conservative square-root Stratonovich noise with non-stationary correlated noise and Neumann boundary conditions. The logarithmic estimates are new even in previously covered settings; they are quantitative, with explicit constants, and they yield a strong pathwise L1 contraction. The paper also gives a clean conceptual explanation of why the Stratonovich correction is needed. However, the manuscript currently contains a load-bearing gap in the proof of the boundary half of the non-vanishing dichotomy, specifically in inequality (79); until that estimate is repaired, the written proof of uniqueness is incomplete because step (49) of Theorem 2.8 relies on the boundary non-vanishing. I view the gap as repairable and the central approach as sound, but the repair is not merely cosmetic.

major comments (1)
  1. [Theorem 2.18, inequality (79)] The displayed inequality (79) is dimensionally inconsistent and, as written, false. The left-hand side is the measure of a subset of ∂U×[0,T] and carries units of surface area multiplied by time, while the right-hand side is |log(1/M)|^{-2} times the square of an L2(∂U)-norm of a time-integrated function and therefore carries units of surface area only. A concrete counterexample is obtained by taking A⊂∂U of surface measure a and setting ρ~=1/M on A for all t∈[0,T] and ρ~=1 elsewhere; then the left-hand side is aT while the right-hand side is aT², which fails whenever T<1. This inequality is the only argument supplied for the boundary half of the non-vanishing condition (15) in Definition 2.4(iii), and the uniqueness proof in Theorem 2.8 explicitly uses the boundary half of (15) in step (49) to discard the boundary term after sending β→0. Thus the boundary non-vanishing is not established by the written proof. The natural repair—use the pointwise bound |A_x| ≤ |log(1/M)|^{-1} |∫_0^T log ρ~_M dt| and then control the resulting integral over ∂U using the H1-in-time regularity from (76)—is plausible, but it is not what the paper displays. This point must be fixed before the main theorem can be accepted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Proposition 2.11] The proof of Proposition 2.11 is a one-sentence sketch citing a Galerkin approximation, the estimates of Proposition 2.12, and Aubin–Lions–Simon compactness. Since this is the existence result for the regularized Neumann problem that underpins all subsequent estimates, a short indication of the Galerkin basis and the passage to the limit would significantly improve verifiability.
  2. [Theorem 2.18, near (84)] In (84) the displayed equality is missing the final '= 0', and the second integrand contains '√ρ~_k' where '√ρ~' is clearly intended; these errors occur in a key identification of the martingale terms and should be corrected.
  3. [Theorem 2.18, after (72)] The sentence introducing the Skorokhod representation says the conclusion follows 'heuristically' from the Skorokhod theorem and then cites Jakubowski's theorem; since this step deals with non-metrizable weak topologies, the invocation should be stated as a rigorous application rather than as a heuristic.
  4. [Theorem 2.18, final L1 truncation step] In the last paragraph of the proof, the passage from L2p(Ω;L2(U)) initial data to L1(Ω;L1(U)) initial data by truncation is compressed: the text says 'a repetition of the above arguments' is used to transfer properties (14), (15), and (17) to the limit, but it should spell out how the monotone limit interacts with the trace-based boundary non-vanishing and with the kinetic measures q_n.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity in the derivation; the paper extends [27] with a self-contained existence/uniqueness proof, and its self-citations are background.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, is an existence, uniqueness, and pathwise L1-stability theorem for the Dean--Kawasaki equation (1) under Assumptions 2.1 and 2.2. The proof does not assume the target result. Existence is built from regularized equations (51) with smooth coefficients, through energy, entropy, H^{-1}, and time-regularity estimates (Propositions 2.12--2.16), followed by compactness, Skorokhod representation, and a strong-solution argument in Theorem 2.18. Uniqueness is proven directly in Theorem 2.8 by differentiating the L1 distance between two kinetic solutions; the only input from Definition 2.4 that is used in a load-bearing way is the non-vanishing dichotomy (15), which the paper attempts to establish in the existence proof via the logarithmic integrability estimates and inequality (79). No parameter is fitted and no prediction is statistically forced. The concept of stochastic kinetic solution is taken from the author's prior work with Gess [27], but the paper explicitly identifies which case [27] did not cover (square-root coefficients with non-stationary noise) and proves new estimates, (10)--(12), for that case; the citation is background, not a substitute for proof. The dimensional inconsistency of (79) flagged by a skeptical reading would be a correctness gap in the boundary part of the non-vanishing proof, not a circularity, since (79) is not equivalent to any input or previously assumed conclusion. Accordingly, no circular step is identified; the minor self-citation does not raise the circularity score beyond the lowest nonzero level.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters fitted to data and no new physical or mathematical entities. It relies on standard stochastic analysis tools and on the kinetic-solution framework developed in [27]. The main domain assumptions are the nondegeneracy of φ and the positivity of the noise's quadratic variation, both explicit and physically motivated.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Itô formula for SPDEs and semimartingales (Krylov [43], Kallenberg [37])
    Used throughout, e.g., in the entropy estimates (57), (58), the H^{-1} estimate (60), and the product rule in Appendix A.
  • standard math Kinetic formulation framework of Lions-Perthame-Tadmor as adapted by Fehrman and Gess [27]
    Definition 2.4 and the uniqueness proof rely on this framework; the paper extends it rather than rebuilding it.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: smooth bounded domain U, s ∈ C^2(U; R^{d×d}) with a = ss^t uniformly elliptic, φ ∈ C([0,∞)) ∩ C^{1,1/2}_{loc}((0,∞)), φ(0)=0, λ̃ ≤ φ' ≤ Λ̃
    Ensures the Itô form, the existence of boundary traces, and the coercivity of the dissipative terms in the estimates.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.2: independent d-dimensional Brownian motions, f_k ∈ C^2, 0 < ⟨ξ⟩_1 < ∞ spatially constant, sup_x ⟨∇·sξ⟩_1 < ∞
    Defines the noise and provides the positive coefficient in the Stratonovich-to-Itô correction; the positivity of ⟨ξ⟩_1 is essential for the logarithmic regularization and the non-vanishing dichotomy.
  • standard math Skorokhod representation theorem in nonmetric spaces (Jakubowski [36])
    Used in Theorem 2.18 to obtain almost sure convergence of the approximating solutions and Brownian motions.
  • standard math Aubin-Lions-Simon compactness lemma
    Used for tightness of the approximating solutions in the existence proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic PDEs with correlated, non-stationary Stratonovich noise of Dean--Kawasaki type." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KMCPEERE

@misc{pith2026250418370,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic PDEs with correlated, non-stationary Stratonovich noise of Dean--Kawasaki type},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KMCPEERE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.18370}
}
read the original abstract

The results of the author and Gess [27] develop a robust well-posedness theory for a broad class of conservative stochastic PDEs, with both probabilistically stationary and non-stationary Stratonovich noise, and with irregular noise coefficients like the square root. However, one case left untreated by [27] is the case of SPDEs that combine conservative, non-stationary Stratonovich noise with square root-like nonlinearities. Such equations arise naturally in the fluctuating hydrodynamics of inhomogenous systems, and a new analysis is required to handle certain discontinuous coefficients appearing in their It\^o formulations. We treat the discontinuities by showing that the equation exhibits a novel regularization of the logarithm of the solution, and establish the well-posedness by building on the concept of a stochastic kinetic solution introduced in [27].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Homogeneous Landau Equation with Regularised Thermal Noise

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Weak solutions exist for a regularised fluctuating homogeneous Landau equation with moderately soft potentials, small conservative noise in Landau-divergence form, and a refined entropy decay when the noise modes are ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [27]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess. Well-posedness of the Dean–Kawa saki and the nonlinear Dawson–Watanabe equation with correlated noise. Arch. Rational. Mech. Anal. , 248(20), 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    J.-P. Aubin. Un th´ eor` eme de compacit´ e.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris , 256:5042–5044, 1963

    work page 1963

  3. [2]

    Bendahmane and K

    M. Bendahmane and K. H. Karlsen. Renormalized entropy so lutions for quasi-linear anisotropic degenerate parabolic equations. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 36(2):405–422, 2004

    work page 2004

  4. [3]

    Bertini, A

    L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, an d C. Landim. Macroscopic fluctuation theory. Reviews of Modern Physics , 87(2):593, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    Billingsley

    P. Billingsley. Convergence of probability measures . Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability a nd Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, second editio n, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [5]

    Bouchet, K

    F. Bouchet, K. Gaw¸ edzki, and C. Nardini. Perturbative C alculation of Quasi-Potential in Non-equilibrium Dif- fusions: A Mean-Field Example. Journal of Statistical Physics , 163(5):1157–1210, June 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [6]

    Chen and B

    G.-Q. Chen and B. Perthame. Well-posedness for non-isot ropic degenerate parabolic-hyperbolic equations. An- nales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e. Analyse Non Lin´ eaire, 20(4):645–668, 2003

    work page 2003

  8. [7]

    A. Clini. Porous media equations with nonlinear gradien t noise and dirichlet boundary conditions. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 159:428–498, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Clini and B

    A. Clini and B. Fehrman. A central limit theorem for nonli near conservative spdes. arXiv:2310.19924, 2023. 37

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Cornalba and J

    F. Cornalba and J. Fischer. The Dean-Kawasaki equation a nd the structure of density fluctuations in systems of diffusing particles. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 247(5):Paper No. 76, 59, 2023

    2023

  3. [10]

    Cornalba, J

    F. Cornalba, J. Fischer, J. Ingmanns, and C. Raithel. De nsity fluctuations in weakly interacting particle systems via the dean-kawasaki equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00429 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Cornalba, T

    F. Cornalba, T. Shardlow, and J. Zimmer. A regularized D ean-Kawasaki model: derivation and analysis. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 51(2):1137–1187, 2019

    2019

  5. [12]

    Cornalba, T

    F. Cornalba, T. Shardlow, and J. Zimmer. From weakly int eracting particles to a regularised Dean-Kawasaki model. Nonlinearity, 33(2):864–891, 2020

    2020

  6. [13]

    Dareiotis and B

    K. Dareiotis and B. Gess. Nonlinear diffusion equations with nonlinear gradient noise. Electron. J. Probab. , 25:Paper No. 35, 43, 2020

    2020

  7. [14]

    De Lellis, F

    C. De Lellis, F. Otto, and M. Westdickenberg. Structure of entropy solutions for multi-dimensional scalar con- servation laws. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 170(2):137–184, 2003

    2003

  8. [15]

    D. Dean. Langevin equation for the density of a system of interacting Langevin processes. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 29(24):L613, 1996

    1996

  9. [16]

    Debussche, M

    A. Debussche, M. Hofmanov´ a, and J. Vovelle. Degenerat e parabolic stochastic partial differential equations: Quasilinear case. Ann. Probab., 44(3):1916–1955, 2016

    1916

  10. [17]

    Debussche and J

    A. Debussche and J. Vovelle. Scalar conservation laws w ith stochastic forcing. Journal of Functional Analysis , 259(4):1014–1042, 2010

    2010

  11. [18]

    N. Dirr, B. Fehrman, and B. Gess. Conservative stochast ic pde and fluctuations of the symmetric simple exclusion process. arXiv:2012.02126, 2021

    2012 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Djurdjevac, H

    A. Djurdjevac, H. Kremp, and N. Perkowski. Weak error an alysis for a nonlinear spde approximation of the dean-kawasaki equation, 2022

    2022

  13. [20]

    Donev, T

    A. Donev, T. G. Fai, and E. Vanden-Eijnden. A reversible mesoscopic model of diffusion in liquids: From giant fluctuations to Fick’s law. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2014(4):P04004, April 2014

    2014

  14. [21]

    Donev and E

    A. Donev and E. Vanden-Eijnden. Dynamic density functi onal theory with hydrodynamic interactions and fluc- tuations. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 140(23):234115, June 2014

    2014

  15. [22]

    L. C. Evans. Partial differential equations , volume 19 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathemat- ical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 2010

    2010

  16. [23]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess. Well-posedness of nonlinear diff usion equations with nonlinear, conservative noise. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 233(1):249–322, 2019

    2019

  17. [24]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess. Path-by-path well-posedness of nonlinear diffusion equations with multiplicative noise. Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 148:221–266, 2021

    2021

  18. [25]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess. Non-equilibrium large deviatio ns and parabolic-hyperbolic PDE with irregular drift. Invent. Math. , 234(2):573–636, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess. Conservative stochastic pdes on the whole space. arXiv:2410.00254, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    P. K. Friz and B. Gess. Stochastic scalar conservation l aws driven by rough paths. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, 33(4):933–963, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    P. K. Friz and N. B. Victoir. Multidimensional stochastic processes as rough paths , volume 120 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. Theory and a pplications

    2010

  22. [30]

    Gess and P

    B. Gess and P. E. Souganidis. Scalar conservation laws w ith multiple rough fluxes. Commun. Math. Sci. , 13(6):1569–1597, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Gess and P

    B. Gess and P. E. Souganidis. Long-time behavior, invar iant measures, and regularizing effects for stochastic scalar conservation laws. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 70(8):1562–1597, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Gess and P

    B. Gess and P. E. Souganidis. Stochastic non-isotropic degenerate parabolic–hyperbolic equations. Stochastic Process. Appl., 127(9):2961–3004, 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    B. Gess, W. Wu, and R. Zhang. Higher order fluctuation exp ansions for nonlinear stochastic heat equations in singular limits. arXiv:2406.17892, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gy¨ ongy and N

    I. Gy¨ ongy and N. Krylov. Existence of strong solutions for Itˆ o’s stochastic equations via approximations.Probab. Theory Related Fields , 105(2):143–158, 1996

    1996

  27. [35]

    Hofmanov´ a

    M. Hofmanov´ a. Degenerate parabolic stochastic parti al differential equations. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 123(12):4294–4336, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Jakubowski

    A. Jakubowski. The almost sure Skorokhod representati on for subsequences in nonmetric spaces. Teor. Veroyat- nost. i Primenen. , 42(1):209–216, 1997

    1997

  29. [37]

    Kallenberg

    O. Kallenberg. Foundations of Modern Probability , volume 99 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer, third edition, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    K. H. Karlsen and N. H. Risebro. On the uniqueness and sta bility of entropy solutions of nonlinear degenerate parabolic equations with rough coefficients. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 9(5):1081–1104, 2003. 38 BENJAMIN FEHRMAN

    2003

  31. [39]

    Kawasaki

    K. Kawasaki. Stochastic model of slow dynamics in super cooled liquids and dense colloidal suspensions. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , 208(1):35–64, 1994

    1994

  32. [40]

    Konarovskyi, T

    V. Konarovskyi, T. Lehmann, and M.-K. von Renesse. Dean -Kawasaki dynamics: ill-posedness vs. triviality. Electron. Commun. Probab. , 24:Paper No. 8, 9, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Konarovskyi and M

    V. Konarovskyi and M. von Renesse. Reversible Coalesci ng-Fragmentating Wasserstein Dynamics on the Real Line. arXiv:1709.02839, September 2017

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Konarovskyi and M.-K

    V. Konarovskyi and M.-K. von Renesse. Modified massive A rratia flow and Wasserstein diffusion. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 72(4):764–800, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    N. V. Krylov. A relatively short proof of Itˆ o’s formula for SPDEs and its applications. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. , 1(1):152–174, 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    J.-L. Lions. Quelques m´ ethodes de r´ esolution des probl` emes aux limites non lin´ eaires. Dunod; Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1969

    1969

  37. [45]

    Lions, B

    P.-L. Lions, B. Perthame, and P. Souganidis. Stochasti c averaging lemmas for kinetic equations. S´ eminaire Laurent Schwartz — EDP et applications , pages 1–17, 2011

    2011

  38. [46]

    Lions, B

    P.-L. Lions, B. Perthame, and P. E. Souganidis. Scalar c onservation laws with rough (stochastic) fluxes. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. , 1(4):664–686, 2013

    2013

  39. [47]

    Lions, B

    P.-L. Lions, B. Perthame, and P. E. Souganidis. Scalar c onservation laws with rough (stochastic) fluxes: The spatially dependent case. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. , 2(4):517–538, 2014

    2014

  40. [48]

    Lions, B

    P.-L. Lions, B. Perthame, and E. Tadmor. A kinetic formu lation of multidimensional scalar conservation laws and related equations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 7(1):169–191, 1994

    1994

  41. [49]

    Perthame

    B. Perthame. Uniqueness and error estimates in first ord er quasilinear conservation laws via the kinetic entropy defect measure. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , 77(10):1055–1064, 1998

    1998

  42. [50]

    Perthame

    B. Perthame. Kinetic formulation of conservation laws , volume 21 of Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications . Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002

    2002

  43. [51]

    S. Popat. Well-posedness of the generalised dean-kawa saki equation with correlated noise on bounded domains. arXiv:2403.19466, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion , volume 293 of Grundlehren der mathema- tischen Wissenschaften . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, third edition, 1999

    1999

  45. [53]

    J. Simon. Compact sets in the space Lp(0, T; B). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) , 146:65–96, 1987

    1987

  46. [54]

    H. Spohn. Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  47. [55]

    von Renesse and K.-T

    M.-K. von Renesse and K.-T. Sturm. Entropic measure and Wasserstein diffusion. Ann. Probab. , 37(3):1114– 1191, 2009

    2009

  48. [56]

    L. Wang, Z. Wu, and R. Zhang. Dean–Kawasaki equation wit h singular interactions and applications to dynamical ising-kac model. arXiv:2207.12774, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Wu and R

    Z. Wu and R. Zhang. McKean–Vlasov pde with irregular dri ft and applications to large deviations for conservative spdes. arXiv:2208.13142, 2022. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70802, Louisiana, USA Email address : fehrman@math.lsu.edu

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.