Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The physical and chemical structure of Sagittarius B2 -- V. Non-thermal emission in the envelope of Sgr B2

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A bubble in Sagittarius B2 shines by shock-accelerated electrons

desk verdict A solid observational case for non-thermal radio emission in a dense H II region, with a plausible but not yet proven Fermi-acceleration origin. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07237 v3 pith:KNM2EMVB submitted 2019-08-20 astro-ph.GA

F. Meng , Á. Sánchez-Monge , P. Schilke , M. Padovani , A. Marcowith , A. Ginsburg , A. Schmiedeke , A. Schwörer
show 3 more authors
C. DePree V. S. Veena Th. Möller
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords SagittariusB2non-thermalradioemissionHIIregionspectralindexfirst-orderFermiaccelerationrecombinationlinessynchrotronradiationmassivestarformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the radio glow of Sgr B2(DS), a bubble-shaped H II region in the outer envelope of the giant molecular cloud Sagittarius B2, is not purely thermal free-free emission from ionized gas. Using VLA continuum maps from 4 to 12 GHz, the authors measure a spectral index between -1.2 and -0.4, a clear signature that part of the emission is synchrotron radiation from relativistic electrons. They separate the thermal and non-thermal components, finding the non-thermal part diffuse and extended while the thermal part is clumpy and concentrated, and they show that the radio recombination lines are stimulated rather than in local thermodynamic equilibrium. The paper's central conclusion is that the relativistic electrons are produced locally by first-order Fermi acceleration where the expanding H II region plows into dense surrounding gas, a hypothesis supported by a shock model that reproduces the observed flux densities and spectral index map.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the spectral index $\alpha$, measured pixel by pixel from 12 tomographic continuum images between 4 and 12 GHz, which separates thermal free-free emission ($\alpha \approx -0.1$) from non-thermal synchrotron emission (more negative), and by the companion diffusive-shock acceleration model (Padovani et al. 2019), which takes as inputs the flow velocity $U$, gas density $n$, and magnetic field $B$ in the shock reference frame and predicts the synchrotron flux produced by accelerated electrons. This model is adjusted by a $\chi^2$ fit to the observed 4-12 GHz flux maps, yielding maps of $U$, $n$, and $B$ and a predicted spectral-index map that matches the observed one. A secondary diagnostic is the RRL peak ratio $\eta = 0.85\,S_{10.5}/S_{8.9}$; values $\eta < 1$ mark stimulated, non-LTE recombination lines, which spatially coincide with the non-thermal emission.

What would settle it

Measure the expansion velocity of the DS H II region directly, through multi-epoch VLA proper motions of the bubble rim or resolved RRL velocity gradients, and test the ionization fraction with low-frequency free-free absorption. If the shock speed is below about 35 km/s over most of the region, or the gas is partly neutral, first-order Fermi acceleration cannot produce the observed GHz synchrotron flux and the non-thermal emission must come from elsewhere.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Sgr B2(DS) is an H II region with a genuine, spatially extended non-thermal radio component rather than a purely thermal source. The observed spectral energy distribution steepens with frequency in a way no optically thin free-free source can produce, with a spectral index between -1.2 and -0.4 across the bubble; after subtracting the thermal contribution, between about 60% and 90% of the flux at 4 GHz is non-thermal. The radio recombination lines are not in LTE but are stimulated, and the pixels with stimulated recombination lines almost exactly coincide with those having a negative spectral index. The authors further argue, using a companion model of shock acceleration in H II regions, that electrons accelerated by first-order Fermi acceleration at the shock between the expanding ionized bubble and the dense envelope can supply the observed synchrotron emission, with shock velocities of 35 to 50 km s$^{-1}$, densities of $1$ to $9\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$, and magnetic fields of 0.3 to 4 mG, all consistent with independent constraints.

Load-bearing premise

The Fermi-acceleration explanation assumes the shocked gas is fully ionized along the whole line of sight at a single temperature (8000 K), and that the shock speed exceeds about 35 km/s across enough of DS; if either condition fails, the predicted synchrotron flux drops and the non-thermal emission would need another origin.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the Fermi-acceleration interpretation is right, Sgr B2(DS) is a Galactic source of locally accelerated cosmic-ray electrons, produced at an H II region shock rather than penetrating from outside.
  • Radio recombination lines in DS cannot be used as simple LTE thermometers; the stimulated, non-LTE component must be modeled to infer electron temperatures and ionized mass.
  • Non-thermal emission may be common at the boundaries of H II regions in dense, high-mass star-forming clouds, rather than an exotic exception.
  • The model directly sets physical conditions at the shock ($U\approx35$-$50$ km s$^{-1}$, $n\approx1$-$9\times10^4$ cm$^{-3}$, $B\approx0.3$-$4$ mG), linking the observed spectral shape to the dynamics of the expanding bubble.
  • This mechanism makes H II region boundaries plausible acceleration sites for the relativistic electrons that produce synchrotron emission in other dense star-forming clouds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the result holds, systematic searches for negative spectral indices around other compact H II regions could uncover many more local particle acceleration sites in the Galactic center, where dense gas blocks penetration of external cosmic rays.
  • The same shock model could be tested in other bubble-like H II regions: wherever an expansion shock meets neutral gas, a negative spectral index should coincide with stimulated radio recombination lines.
  • A multi-epoch VLA observation of DS could measure the bubble's expansion proper motion directly, converting the fitted shock velocity $U$ from a model parameter into a measured kinematic quantity.
  • The inferred mG magnetic fields may be checkable through Faraday rotation measures of background or embedded sources at low frequencies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents VLA CnB/D-configuration observations of the Sgr B2 complex at 4-12 GHz, focusing on the Sgr B2(DS) region. The authors detect a bubble-shaped radio continuum source with spectral indices between -0.4 and -1.2 over 4-12 GHz, which they interpret as a mix of thermal free-free emission from an H II region and more extended non-thermal (synchrotron) emission. They decompose the two components with two methods, find that radio recombination lines in part of DS are out of LTE and likely stimulated by the non-thermal radiation, and model the non-thermal emission with first-order Fermi acceleration at the shock between the expanding H II region and the surrounding dense gas. The companion model (Padovani et al. 2019) is fitted to the observed maps, yielding maps of shock velocity U, density n, and magnetic field B. The paper concludes that Fermi acceleration can reproduce the observed flux densities and spectral index and that the central H II region is ionized by an O7 star.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this paper provides one of the clearest examples of radio non-thermal emission associated with an H II region in a dense Galactic-center cloud, and it supports the emerging picture that some H II regions can accelerate particles locally. The quantitative decomposition of thermal vs non-thermal emission and the correlation between negative spectral indices and stimulated RRLs are valuable observational results. Strengths include the careful uv-matching of the 12 frequency maps, the use of GMRT 350 MHz data as an independent consistency check, and the transparent statement of the model's simplifying assumptions. The significance is tempered, however, by the large quantitative disagreement between the two decomposition methods and by the fact that the Fermi-acceleration interpretation is based on a fit to the same data used to define the spectral index, so the model agreement is partly a consistency check rather than an independent prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2] The first-order Fermi acceleration origin is not independently tested. The χ2 procedure fits U, n, and B to the same 12-frequency flux maps (Fig. 3) from which the observed spectral index is derived, so the statement that the model 'reproduces the observed flux density and spectral index' is a consistency check of a fit, not a predictive validation. The model also assumes a fully ionized medium at Te = 8000 K and constant conditions along the line of sight, as acknowledged at the end of §5.2, and the fitted thermal free-free component is never compared with the RRL-derived free-free maps (RFE; §4.2, Eq. 1). I ask the authors to add an independent constraint—for example, use the RRL emission measure to fix n, or compare the predicted free-free component with RFE—and to show explicitly that U exceeds the ~35 km/s threshold over the regions where synchrotron emission is claimed. Without such a check, the physical-origin conclusion should be presented as suggestive rather than established.
  2. [§4.1] The two decomposition methods disagree quantitatively on the non-thermal fraction at 4 GHz: about 60% from the 11.2 GHz extrapolation (§4.1.1) versus 90% from the two-power-law SED fit (§4.1.2). The authors attribute the difference to the underlying assumptions, but a factor of four in the non-thermal/thermal ratio propagates directly into the derived component maps and into the conclusion that the thermal component is 'clumpy and more concentrated' while the non-thermal component is diffuse. Please provide a systematic uncertainty for the decomposition and state which spatial conclusions are robust to the assumed alpha_th and alpha_nt values.
  3. [§5.2] The velocity threshold for particle acceleration is stated inconsistently. The text says electrons can be efficiently accelerated if the flow velocity exceeds 35 km/s, but the fitted range is reported as 33 ≲ U ≲ 50 km/s, while the Summary states velocities between 35 and 50 km/s. The low end of the fitted range lies below the stated threshold, and the paper does not discuss what fraction of DS pixels have U < 35 km/s or whether the model predicts substantially reduced synchrotron emission there. Please report the threshold and the fitted values consistently, and quantify the spatial extent of sub-threshold regions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.2] The claim that the model-derived α map is 'in agreement' with the observed α map is not quantified. A residual map or a per-pixel comparison of αmod and αobs would strengthen the statement.
  2. [§4.2] Equation (1) assumes LTE and Te = 8000 K. The RFE maps exceed the observed continuum by a factor of about two at low frequencies; the interpretation in terms of stimulated emission would be more convincing if the authors also discussed whether a different Te or a non-LTE correction to Eq. (1) could remove part of the excess.
  3. [§3.2] The robust loss function r(z) = sqrt(1 + z/0.01) − 1 is introduced without explanation. Please state why this estimator was chosen and how the reported α uncertainties from the covariance matrix are affected by the robust weighting.
  4. [Appendix B] The GMRT comparison relies on unpublished data and the SED curves in Fig. B.1 are described as qualitative. Once the GMRT paper is available, please provide quantitative error bars for the 350 MHz flux measurements and for the derived combined spectral index.
  5. [Throughout] The notation for ionized hydrogen is inconsistent ('H ii region', 'HII region', 'Hii region'). Please standardize to a single form.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The Fermi-acceleration origin of the non-thermal emission is supported by a chi-square fit of U, n, and B to the same 12-frequency maps that the model is said to reproduce, and the model itself is imported from a companion paper by overlapping authors; the non-thermal detection itself is robust and independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5.2, 'Non-thermal emission origin', model fit paragraph (Fig. 12).]
    "We performed a χ2 test to find the values of the velocity (U), density (n), and magnetic field strength (B) that best reproduce the observations. ... The model also gives an α map of DS, which is in agreement with the observed α map (Fig. 5)."

    The model is said to 'reproduce' the observed 12-frequency flux maps and the spectral-index map, but U, n, and B were obtained by a χ2 fit to exactly those maps. The flux-density normalization and the frequency slope of the synchrotron emission are controlled by these fitted parameters, so the reported agreement in flux and in α is a property of the fit, not an independent prediction. The paper labels the output 'αmod' versus 'αobs' from the same dataset, and no separate validation set or independent shock-velocity measurement is used to test the Fermi-acceleration scenario.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 5.2, first paragraph (companion paper Padovani et al. 2019).]
    "In a companion paper (Padovani et al. 2019), we present an extension to this theory applied to H ii regions. We demonstrate that electrons can be efficiently accelerated under the hypothesis that the flow velocity in the reference frame of an expanding H ii region hitting denser material is sufficiently high (> 35 km s−1) to switch on particle acceleration."

    The central physical conclusion—that the non-thermal emission originates from first-order Fermi acceleration at the H ii region shock—rests on a companion paper with overlapping authorship (Padovani, Sánchez-Monge, Meng, and Schilke appear in both works). The present paper does not independently validate the companion model; it adopts its assumptions (fully ionized medium, Te = 8000 K, constant line-of-sight conditions) by citation, and then fits the model's U, n, and B to the very data the model is said to explain. This self-citation is load-bearing for the origin claim rather than a merely incidental reference.

full rationale

The non-thermal detection itself is not circular: the negative spectral index (-1.2 to -0.4) is derived directly from the VLA 4-12 GHz maps, and the GMRT 350 MHz comparison independently confirms the presence of non-thermal emission in DS. The RRL non-LTE analysis also provides an independent, model-free correlation between negative spectral index and stimulated recombination lines. The SED decomposition in Section 4.1 uses assumed fixed indices (alpha_th = -0.1 and alpha_nt = -0.7), which is an explicit assumption that shapes the derived spatial maps of the thermal and non-thermal components, but the paper labels this as a decomposition and notes the dependence on the assumed indices, so it is not a hidden prediction. The circularity is confined to the origin claim. In Section 5.2, U, n, and B are determined by a chi-square fit to the same 12-frequency flux maps that are then reported as 'reproduced' by the model, and the model-generated alpha map is compared with the observed alpha map from those same data; this agreement is therefore a property of the fit, not an independent test of first-order Fermi acceleration. The applicability of the acceleration model to H ii regions is taken from a companion paper by overlapping authors, making the physical-origin conclusion depend on a load-bearing self-citation whose free parameters are then fitted to the data. Because the non-thermal emission is robustly established while the specific Fermi-acceleration origin is only partially validated by a fitted model, the paper is partially but not fully circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The free parameters include the three physical quantities fitted in the Fermi acceleration model (U, n, B) and the two fixed spectral indices imposed in the SED decomposition, plus the assumed full ionization fraction. The axioms cover the power-law SED assumption, the pure-thermal 11.2 GHz assumption, the companion Fermi model, the fully ionized constant line-of-sight assumption, the zero-background uv assumption, and the LTE RRL relation. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • shock velocity U = 33-50 km/s
    Chosen by chi-squared fit to the 12-frequency flux maps in the Fermi acceleration model (Sect. 5.2).
  • volume density n = 1e4-9e4 cm^-3
    Chosen by chi-squared fit to the 12-frequency flux maps in the Fermi acceleration model (Sect. 5.2).
  • magnetic field B = 0.3-4 mG
    Chosen by chi-squared fit to the 12-frequency flux maps in the Fermi acceleration model (Sect. 5.2).
  • thermal spectral index alpha_th = -0.1
    Assumed optically thin free-free index used in both decomposition methods (Sect. 4.1.1 and 4.1.2).
  • non-thermal spectral index alpha_nt = -0.7
    Taken from prior literature and imposed in the two-power-law SED fit (Sect. 4.1.2).
  • ionization fraction = 1.0 (fully ionized)
    Assumed in the Fermi acceleration model to compute the electron flux and synchrotron emission (Sect. 5.2).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The radio SED is a power law S_nu proportional to nu^alpha for each component over 4-12 GHz.
    Used for the spectral index analysis (Sect. 3.2) and for the decomposition in Sect. 4.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The 11.2 GHz continuum in Sgr B2(DS) is purely thermal free-free emission.
    Method 1 of the decomposition (Sect. 4.1.1) and the Lyman continuum estimate (Sect. 5.1) rely on this; the authors note it may overestimate the thermal component.
  • domain assumption The Fermi acceleration model of Padovani et al. (2019) correctly describes electron acceleration in H II region shocks.
    The interpretation of the non-thermal emission as local first-order Fermi acceleration depends on this companion model (Sect. 5.2).
  • domain assumption The gas in Sgr B2(DS) is completely ionized with Te = 8000 K along the line of sight.
    Used in the Fermi model and in Eq. (1) for deriving RRL-based free-free emission (Sects. 4.2 and 5.2).
  • domain assumption The uv filtering removes essentially all large-scale background emission, so the zero background assumption holds.
    Zero background is checked via intensity profiles in Appendix A, but missing short spacings could in principle bias the spectral index.
  • standard math The LTE relation for radio recombination lines, Eq. (1), is valid when LTE holds.
    Used to derive the RFE maps and the eta ratio in Sect. 4.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The physical and chemical structure of Sagittarius B2 -- V. Non-thermal emission in the envelope of Sgr B2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KNM2EMVB

@misc{pith2026190807237,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The physical and chemical structure of Sagittarius B2 -- V. Non-thermal emission in the envelope of Sgr B2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KNM2EMVB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07237}
}
read the original abstract

The giant molecular cloud Sagittarius B2 (hereafter SgrB2) is the most massive region with ongoing high-mass star formation in the Galaxy. In the southern region of the 40-pc large envelope of SgrB2, we encounter the SgrB2(DS) region which hosts more than 60 high-mass protostellar cores distributed in an arc shape around an extended HII region. We use the Very Large Array in its CnB and D configurations, and in the frequency bands C (4--8 GHz) and X (8--12 GHz) to observe the whole SgrB2 complex. Continuum and radio recombination line maps are obtained. We detect radio continuum emission in SgrB2(DS) in a bubble-shaped structure. From 4 to 12 GHz, we derive a spectral index between -1.2 and -0.4, indicating the presence of non-thermal emission. We decompose the contribution from thermal and non-thermal emission, and find that the thermal component is clumpy and more concentrated, while the non-thermal component is more extended and diffuse. The radio recombination lines in the region are found to be not in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) but stimulated by the non-thermal emission. The thermal free-free emission is likely tracing an HII region ionized by an O7 star, while the non-thermal emission can be generated by relativistic electrons created through first-order Fermi acceleration. We have developed a simple model of the SgrB2(DS) region and found that first-order Fermi acceleration can reproduce the observed flux density and spectral index.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07237 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Continuum images of Sgr B2 in C (panel a) and X (panel b) bands. Relevant regions are marked with their names (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. C band (4–8 GHz) continuum emission map of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Channel maps of the Sgr B2(DS) region. All the 12 maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The spectral index (α, panel a) and its uncertainty, (panel b) throughout the whole Sgr B2 region. The regions marked in both panels correspond to those regions also labeled in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The spectral index of DS. Six spots are taken as examples to show the fitting of SED and the fit spectral index ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial distribution of synchrotron (or non-thermal, left panel), mixed (central panel, corresponding to observed image) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial distribution of the synchrotron (left panel), mixed (central panel) and free-free (right panel) components of DS at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Right: Spectral index map of the Sgr B2(DS) as shown in the central panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top panels: Free-free continuum maps of the Sgr B2(DS) region derived from the four staked RRLs (RFE as described in Sect. 4.2, following Eq. 1) at 4.4, 6.8, 8.9, and 10.5 GHz.. Bottom panel: Observed continuum emission at 4.4, 6.8, 8.9 and 10.5 GHz. For comparison, th…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Map of η (see Sect. 4.2) in DS. The X band continuum emission is overlaid as contours. The synthesized beam, corre￾sponding to 800, is plotted as a dark circle at the lower left corner. The dashed circle indicates the area in which pixels are taken into account for […
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Maps of shock velocity (U), volume density (n), and magnetic field strength (B) of DS that reproduce the observed flux density maps at the 12 frequencies (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-thermal emission from cosmic rays accelerated in HII regions

    astro-ph.HE 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Shock-accelerated thermal electrons inside HII regions can explain the observed non-thermal radio emission and spectral indices in Sgr B2(DS).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    1998, , 116, 2953

    Anglada , G., Villuendas , E., Estalella , R., et al. 1998, , 116, 2953

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  3. [3]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    2013

  4. [4]

    1993, , 100, 647

    Bressan , A., Fagotto , F., Bertelli , G., & Chiosi , C. 1993, , 100, 647

    1993

  5. [5]

    J., Cotton , W

    Condon , J. J., Cotton , W. D., Greisen , E. W., et al. 1998, , 115, 1693

    1998

  6. [6]

    M., Roberts , D

    Crutcher , R. M., Roberts , D. A., Mehringer , D. M., & Troland , T. H. 1996, , 462, L79

    work page 1996

  7. [7]

    G., Goss , W

    De Pree , C. G., Goss , W. M., & Gaume , R. A. 1998, , 500, 847

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    G., Peters , T., Mac Low , M.-M., et al

    De Pree , C. G., Peters , T., Mac Low , M.-M., et al. 2014, , 781, L36

    work page 2014

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Draine , B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  2. [10]

    F., Curiel , S., & Torrelles , J

    Garay , G., Ramirez , S., Rodriguez , L. F., Curiel , S., & Torrelles , J. M. 1996, , 459, 193

    1996

  3. [11]

    A., Claussen , M

    Gaume , R. A., Claussen , M. J., de Pree , C. G., Goss , W. M., & Mehringer , D. M. 1995, , 449, 663

    1995

  4. [12]

    2018, , 853, 171

    Ginsburg , A., Bally , J., Barnes , A., et al. 2018, , 853, 171

    2018

  5. [13]

    2016, , 586, A50

    Ginsburg , A., Henkel , C., Ao , Y., et al. 2016, , 586, A50

    2016

  6. [14]

    F., Lis , D

    Goldsmith , P. F., Lis , D. C., Hills , R., & Lasenby , J. 1990, , 350, 186

    1990

  7. [15]

    2018, , 615, L15

    Gravity Collaboration , Abuter , R., Amorim , A., et al. 2018, , 615, L15

    2018

  8. [16]

    M., Jewell , P

    Hollis , J. M., Jewell , P. R., Remijan , A. J., & Lovas , F. J. 2007, , 660, L125

    2007

  9. [17]

    M., Pedelty , J

    Hollis , J. M., Pedelty , J. A., Boboltz , D. A., et al. 2003, , 596, L235

    2003

  10. [18]

    I., Crocker , R

    Jones , D. I., Crocker , R. M., Ott , J., Protheroe , R. J., & Ekers , R. D. 2011, , 141, 82

    2011

  11. [19]

    M., Smith , N., Reiter , M., & Bally , J

    Kiminki , M. M., Smith , N., Reiter , M., & Bally , J. 2017, , 468, 2469

    2017

  12. [20]

    Kruijssen , J. M. D., Dale , J. E., & Longmore , S. N. 2015, , 447, 1059

    2015

  13. [21]

    2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Kurtz , S. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 267, Hot Star Workshop III: The Earliest Phases of Massive Star Birth, ed. P. Crowther , 81

    2002

  14. [22]

    2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Kurtz , S. 2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 227, Massive Star Birth: A Crossroads of Astrophysics, ed. R. Cesaroni , M. Felli , E. Churchwell , & M. Walmsley , 111--119

    2005

  15. [23]

    N., Brogan , C

    LaRosa , T. N., Brogan , C. L., Shore , S. N., et al. 2005, , 626, L23

    2005

  16. [24]

    N., Kassim , N

    LaRosa , T. N., Kassim , N. E., Lazio , T. J. W., & Hyman , S. D. 2000, , 119, 207

    2000

  17. [25]

    J., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Cotton , W

    Law , C. J., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Cotton , W. D. 2008, , 177, 515

    2008

  18. [26]

    & Draine , B

    Li , A. & Draine , B. T. 2001, , 554, 778

    2001

  19. [27]

    A., Rodr \' guez-Fern \'a ndez , N., de Vicente , P., & Wilson , T

    Mart \' n-Pintado , J., Gaume , R. A., Rodr \' guez-Fern \'a ndez , N., de Vicente , P., & Wilson , T. L. 1999, , 519, 667

    1999

  20. [28]

    P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K

    McMullin , J. P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw , F. Hill , & D. J. Bell , 127

    2007

  21. [29]

    M., Palmer , P., Goss , W

    Mehringer , D. M., Palmer , P., Goss , W. M., & Yusef-Zadeh , F. 1993, , 412, 684

    1993

  22. [30]

    S., Moffat , A

    M \"u cke , A., Koribalski , B. S., Moffat , A. F. J., Corcoran , M. F., & Stevens , I. R. 2002, , 571, 366

    2002

  23. [31]

    Padovani , M., Galli , D., & Glassgold , A. E. 2009, , 501, 619

    2009

  24. [32]

    2013, , 560, A114

    Padovani , M., Hennebelle , P., & Galli , D. 2013, , 560, A114

    2013

  25. [33]

    2015, , 582, L13

    Padovani , M., Hennebelle , P., Marcowith , A., & Ferri \`e re , K. 2015, , 582, L13

    2015

  26. [34]

    2016, , 590, A8

    Padovani , M., Marcowith , A., Hennebelle , P., & Ferri \`e re , K. 2016, , 590, A8

    2016

  27. [35]

    2019, arXiv e-prints [ [arXiv] 1908.07246 ]

    Padovani , M., Marcowith , A., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Meng , F., & Schilke , P. 2019, arXiv e-prints [ [arXiv] 1908.07246 ]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    1973, , 78, 929

    Panagia , N. 1973, , 78, 929

    1973

  29. [37]

    2016, , 588, A36

    Pereira , V., L \'o pez-Santiago , J., Miceli , M., Bonito , R., & de Castro , E. 2016, , 588, A36

    2016

  30. [38]

    Perley , R. A. & Butler , B. J. 2013, , 204, 19

    2013

  31. [39]

    1998, , 505, 473

    Platania , P., Bensadoun , M., Bersanelli , M., et al. 1998, , 505, 473

    1998

  32. [40]

    2018, , 614, A123

    Pols , S., Schw \"o rer , A., Schilke , P., et al. 2018, , 614, A123

    2018

  33. [41]

    R., Terrier , R., et al

    Ponti , G., Morris , M. R., Terrier , R., et al. 2015, , 453, 172

    2015

  34. [42]

    J., Ott , J., Ekers , R

    Protheroe , R. J., Ott , J., Ekers , R. D., Jones , D. I., & Crocker , R. M. 2008, , 390, 683

    2008

  35. [43]

    V., Arendt , R

    Ram \' rez , S. V., Arendt , R. G., Sellgren , K., et al. 2008, , 175, 147

    2008

  36. [44]

    J., Menten , K

    Reid , M. J., Menten , K. M., Brunthaler , A., et al. 2014, , 783, 130

    2014

  37. [45]

    2013, , 766, 114

    S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Kurtz , S., Palau , A., et al. 2013, , 766, 114

    2013

  38. [46]

    2017, , 604, A6

    S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Schilke , P., Schmiedeke , A., et al. 2017, , 604, A6

    2017

  39. [47]

    2016, , 588, A143

    Schmiedeke , A., Schilke , P., M \"o ller , T., et al. 2016, , 588, A143

    2016

  40. [48]

    2019, , 628, A6

    Schw \"o rer , A., S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Schilke , P., et al. 2019, , 628, A6

    2019

  41. [49]

    Shaver , P. A. 1978, , 68, 97

    1978

  42. [50]

    G., Hoare , M

    Steggles , H. G., Hoare , M. G., & Pittard , J. M. 2017, , 466, 4573

    2017

  43. [51]

    S., Vig , S., Sebastian , B., et al

    Veena , V. S., Vig , S., Sebastian , B., et al. 2019, , 482, 4630

    2019

  44. [52]

    S., Vig , S., Tej , A., et al

    Veena , V. S., Vig , S., Tej , A., et al. 2016, , 456, 2425

    2016

  45. [53]

    2016, , 819, L35

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Cotton , W., Wardle , M., & Intema , H. 2016, , 819, L35

    2016

  46. [54]

    W., Arendt , R

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Hewitt , J. W., Arendt , R. G., et al. 2009, , 702, 178

    2009

  47. [55]

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Muno , M., Wardle , M., & Lis , D. C. 2007 a , , 656, 847

    2007

  48. [56]

    2013, Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 117, 9404

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Wardle , M., Lis , D., et al. 2013, Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 117, 9404

    2013

  49. [57]

    2007 b , , 665, L123

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Wardle , M., & Roy , S. 2007 b , , 665, L123

    2007

  50. [58]

    Zuckerman , B., Palmer , P., Penfield , H., & Lilley , A. E. 1967, , 149, L61

    1967

  51. [59]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  52. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.