REVIEW 3 cited by
Whisper-AT: Noise-Robust Automatic Speech Recognizers are Also Strong General Audio Event Taggers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we focus on Whisper, a recent automatic speech recognition model trained with a massive 680k hour labeled speech corpus recorded in diverse conditions. We first show an interesting finding that while Whisper is very robust against real-world background sounds (e.g., music), its audio representation is actually not noise-invariant, but is instead highly correlated to non-speech sounds, indicating that Whisper recognizes speech conditioned on the noise type. With this finding, we build a unified audio tagging and speech recognition model Whisper-AT by freezing the backbone of Whisper, and training a lightweight audio tagging model on top of it. With <1% extra computational cost, Whisper-AT can recognize audio events, in addition to spoken text, in a single forward pass.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fusion Embedding: A Unified Embedding Space for Text, Image, Video, and Audio
Trained connectors and audio-only gated adapters integrate audio into a frozen vision-language embedding space, preserving base outputs bit-exactly and yielding emergent audio-image retrieval.
-
SPEARBench: A Benchmark for Naturalness Evaluation in Streaming Speech-to-Speech Language Models
An open-source benchmark for speech-to-speech models shows that current systems produce intelligible audio but diverge from human conversational behavior in latency, dialect consistency, emotional entrainment, and prosody.
-
LLaSO: A Foundational Framework for Reproducible Research in Large Language and Speech Model
LLaSO releases a 3.8B speech-language model, 25.5M training instances, and an evaluation benchmark, claiming a normalized score of 0.72.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.