Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 31 references

Extensive Database of Spatial Ballistic Captures with Application to Lunar Trailblazer

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Extending the Energy Transition Domain to three dimensions yields a database of millions of lunar ballistic captures and practical backup insertions for Lunar Trailblazer.

desk verdict Good spatial extension and a practical mission study, but the sign error in Eq. (21) undermines the printed derivation of every ETD initial condition and must be resolved first. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09584 v1 pith:KQI3VM6A submitted 2025-06-11 math.NA cs.NAmath.DS

Lorenzo Anoè , Roberto Armellin , Gregory Lantoine , Claudio Bombardelli This is my paper
classification math.NAcs.NAmath.DS MSC 70F0770F15
keywords ballisticcaptureEnergyTransitionDomainspatialcircularrestrictedthree-bodyproblemlunartrajectorydesignephemerismodelTrailblazerlow-energyinsertiondatabase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the Energy Transition Domain, a geometric filter for ballistic capture previously used in the planar circular restricted three-body problem, can be extended to full three-dimensional motion and turned into a large database of spatial ballistic captures. It applies this database to Lunar Trailblazer, selecting candidates whose Earth-escape orbits resemble the mission's nominal trajectory and converting them into a high-fidelity ephemeris model. If the method works, mission designers gain a ready catalog of lunar insertion backups reachable with tens of meters per second of correction, including multi-revolution, polar, and repeated-close-approach captures. The authors report roughly 20 million high-fidelity captures within their 60 m/s selection threshold, and they show sample three-impulse transfers from the nominal trajectory costing about 66 m/s.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Energy Transition Domain: the set of positions in configuration space, at fixed Jacobi constant, where the two-body Kepler energy of the spacecraft with respect to the Moon is exactly zero, a necessary condition for temporary capture. In the spatial case, each such position gives a circle of admissible velocity vectors, obtained as the intersection of two velocity-space spheres, with the circle parameterized by the declination of the Moon-relative velocity. The database is built by tracking capture sets across the three-body energy parameter, out-of-plane position, and velocity declination using a polygonal-boundary expansion algorithm, with the planar symmetry of the circular restricted three-body problem used to halve the search. A mission-specific distance metric estimates the mono-impulsive velocity change needed to reshape the Earth-escape orbit of a candidate into the nominal Lunar Trailblazer orbit, and a rotopulsating-frame transformation converts selected initial conditions into the high-fidelity ephemeris model.

What would settle it

On a slice where the three-body energy parameter is near the value where capture regions begin to split, run a dense uniform grid over the full Energy Transition Domain section at out-of-plane parameter values just past a step, and check whether every ballistic capture found lies inside the polygon produced by the offset-expansion algorithm; finding even one capture outside that boundary would refute the claimed comprehensiveness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the spatial Energy Transition Domain has a simple geometric description in velocity space: for a fixed Jacobi constant, the condition of zero two-body energy with respect to the Moon makes the allowed velocity vectors the intersection of two spheres, a one-parameter family parameterized by the declination of the Moon-relative velocity. Sampling this family over grids in the three-body energy parameter, the out-of-plane position, and the velocity declination, then propagating under the circular restricted three-body problem, produces capture sets that can be expanded with polygonal offsets to form a spatial database of ballistic captures. A subset selected by a distance metric based on Earth-centered osculating orbital elements is then transformed into a Sun-Earth-Moon ephemeris model through a rotopulsating-frame transformation. The resulting mission-tailored set contains millions of captures for Lunar Trailblazer, including long-lived corridors, stable polar captures, and trajectories with two nearly identical polar perilune opportunities that could serve as backup insertion points.

Load-bearing premise

The search assumes that every capture region at the next out-of-plane parameter step overlaps the region found at the previous step, because the search starts from the previous capture set and only expands by a fixed offset; a capture region that suddenly appears or jumps would be missed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reported database gives low-energy lunar missions a precomputed catalog of millions of spatial ballistic captures, so backup insertion options can be looked up without repeating the full search.
  • For Lunar Trailblazer specifically, the identified captures include corridors lasting 45 or more revolutions and trajectories with two closely matched polar perilunes, meaning a missed first insertion burn could be followed by another opportunity.
  • Because the selection is based on Earth-escape orbital elements, the same pipeline can be rerun for other lunar or planetary missions whose nominal low-energy trajectory is known.
  • The sample three-impulse transfers from the nominal Lunar Trailblazer trajectory to backup captures cost about 66 m/s, close to the distance metric's estimate of 44 to 57 m/s, indicating the metric can pre-filter candidates before full optimization.
  • Successive small braking maneuvers of 5 m/s at perilunes can stabilize a chaotic capture into a longer-lived lunar orbit, suggesting that insertion maneuvers can be distributed across multiple revolutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same Energy Transition Domain to ephemeris pipeline could be used to generate contingency capture catalogs for future lunar orbiters, landers, or crewed vehicles, since the database query reduces to matching desired Earth-escape orbital elements.
  • Editorial extension: the claimed comprehensiveness of the database depends on capture regions varying continuously across parameter steps, so independent dense-grid spot checks at a few parameter slices would be needed to confirm that no disconnected capture regions were missed.
  • Editorial extension: the longest reported captures rely on the Moon's orbital eccentricity and solar perturbations in the ephemeris model, so their lifetimes may change in even higher-fidelity models that include lunar gravity harmonics or solar radiation pressure; testing that sensitivity is a natural next step.
  • Editorial extension: clustering or machine-learning analysis of the roughly 20 million entry database, which the paper suggests as future work, could reveal dynamical families such as distant-retrograde-orbit-like or butterfly-like captures and make the catalog easier to navigate for mission planners.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper extends the Energy Transition Domain (ETD) method from the planar to the spatial Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem, defines spatial ballistic capture sets C(Γ,z,ζ), and constructs a database of roughly 200 million CR3BP capture initial conditions. It then introduces a mission-specific distance metric, filters candidates dynamically similar to the Lunar Trailblazer insertion phase, transitions them into an Earth–Moon–Sun ephemeris model (yielding about 20 million ephemeris BCs), and analyzes the resulting set, including sample trajectories with long capture durations, polar perilunes, and repeated close approaches. The central claims are that the ETD framework can be systematically extended to three dimensions to produce a comprehensive BC database, and that mission-relevant subsets can be transitioned into an ephemeris model to provide practical backup insertion options for Lunar Trailblazer.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a large three-dimensional lunar ballistic-capture catalog and a repeatable pipeline from CR3BP initial conditions to ephemeris-based mission design. The two fmincon-validated transfers are a genuine strength because they give an independent check that the distance metric selects candidates reachable with tens of meters per second, and the Appendix A initial-condition tables support reproduction. The significance is currently tempered by a sign error in the printed core equations and by unverified algorithmic assumptions behind the completeness claim; once those are resolved, the framework would be a useful contribution to low-energy trajectory design.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.B, Eqs. (21)-(24)] The printed expression for c in Eq. (21) contains a sign error before the term 2(1−μ)x. Substituting Eq. (19) together with Eq. (9) into Eq. (4) gives c = [2(1−μ)/r1 + 2(1−μ)x − (1−μ)^2 − C_J]/(2 v2 cosζ), not the printed form with −2(1−μ)x. I verified the arithmetic on the Table 2 point (x2=−0.02, y2=−0.25, z=0.1, Γ=1): the printed formula yields |c/A| ≈ 26/cosζ > 1 for every admissible ζ, so Eq. (23) has no real solution and that point would not lie on the ETD, contradicting Fig. 5 and Table 2; with the corrected sign, |c/A| ≈ 0.72/cosζ, which falls below unity over part of the admissible ζ range. Because Eqs. (23), (9), (12), and (13) generate every initial condition that is propagated to build the capture sets C(Γ,z,ζ), this is a load-bearing error. Please correct the sign and provide a consistency check showing that the database entries were generated with the correct expression rather than with the printed one.
  2. [Section IV.B, Algorithms 1 and 2] The search-space initialization S ← C_{i,j−1,k} (Algorithm 1, line 9) and S ← C_{i,j,k−1} (Algorithm 2, line 13), followed by boundary expansion only while BCs are found on ∂S, implicitly assumes that the capture set varies continuously, and remains overlapping from one z- or ζ-slice to the next. The paper gives no test of this assumption. If a capture region becomes disconnected or jumps at a parameter step, the boundary expansion can stop before ever encountering it, and the claimed completeness of the database fails silently. Please add a validation, for example independent full-grid searches over selected (Γ,z,ζ) planes with a finer step, or a quantitative bound on how far capture regions can move between the adopted steps Δz=4×10^−3 and Δζ=1°.
  3. [Section IV.D, Table 3] No resolution or convergence study is reported for the numerical parameters h=4×10^−4, d_O=2×10^−3, ΔΓ=0.02, and the doubled steps used in Algorithm 2. Since the expansion loops sample only boundary vertices (Algorithm 1, line 12), a capture feature smaller than the sampling spacing or located between vertices can be missed regardless of the offset. This is directly relevant to the paper's repeated claim of an 'extensive' and 'complete' database. Please report a convergence or sensitivity analysis, for example repeating a representative parameter slice at h/2 and h/4 and comparing the resulting capture sets and counts, or soften the completeness claim accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III.B, Eq. (15)] In Eq. (15), the first two dotted components appear to carry the wrong subscript: the inverse transformation v2 = v + k × r2 should involve the synodic velocity components (ẋ, ẏ, ż), not the inertial components (ẋ2, ẏ2, ż2). Please clarify the notation.
  2. [Section V.C] The sentence stating that selecting all BCs below an inflated threshold 'can be guaranteed' to pick all candidates compatible with a required orbit is stronger than the approximations in Table 4 support; I recommend rephrasing this as a heuristic or providing a formal justification.
  3. [Section VI.C, Algorithm 3] The roughly 2% of transitions that fail are attributed to ephemeris-model differences, but no spatial or temporal characterization of these failures is reported. Please clarify whether the failures are uniformly distributed or concentrated and whether they affect the final mission-specific subset.
  4. [Section VII.B] The fmincon validation of the two three-impulse transfers is a useful independent check, but the paper does not tabulate the maneuver epochs and magnitudes; adding them would allow independent verification of the reported Δv values.
  5. [Tables 8 and 9] The percentages in Table 9 do not appear to sum to 100, and the categories in Table 8 mix 'total revolutions' with '2 revs ... 8 revs' columns; please clarify the categorization and rounding.
  6. [Appendix A] The initial-condition tables are a welcome reproducibility aid; the paper would benefit from also stating the integrator tolerances, force model settings, and Spice kernels used for the ephemeris propagations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spatial BC database is generated by direct CR3BP propagation from independently derived ETD initial conditions, and the ephemeris subset is validated by external optimized transfers.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. The ETD is defined analytically from two velocity-space constraints (zero two-body energy and fixed Jacobi constant), and initial conditions are obtained by solving Eq. (23) after substituting the CR3BP equations; capture is then determined by numerical propagation of Eq. (1), not by ETD membership itself. The spatial extension uses the authors' planar capture sets from [21] only as a seed for the polygonal search (Algorithms 1 and 2), and all candidate states are re-propagated in the CR3BP; thus the database entries are not forced by a fitted parameter or by the prior result. The distance metric is used to filter candidates before ephemeris transition, and the claim that it is useful is checked a posteriori by two independent fmincon-optimized three-impulse transfers (66.1 m/s and 65.8 m/s against metric estimates 44.2 and 57.4 m/s), which are not used to tune the metric. The continuity and incremental-envelope assumption in Algorithms 1 and 2 is a completeness risk, not a circularity: it can cause missed regions but does not make the found captures equivalent to the inputs. The skeptically noted sign issue in Eq. (21) is a correctness question, not a circularity, and therefore does not change the score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard three-body dynamics plus several hand-picked numerical and mission-design parameters. The most important unstated premise is the continuity/completeness assumption behind the polygonal search, which determines whether the database is truly comprehensive. No new physical entities or forces are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • r2_lim = 0.9 LU
    Defines the escape threshold in the BC definition (Section II.B); any trajectory with r2 >= 0.9 LU is treated as escaped, so the contents of the capture database depend on this hand-picked value.
  • Grid and propagation step sizes = ΔΓ=0.02, Δz=4e-3 LU, Δζ=1 deg, h=4e-4 LU, d_O=2e-3 LU, τ_s=10·(2π) TU, τ_sp=τ_B=2·(2π) TU
    Table 3 parameters are chosen rather than derived; no convergence or sensitivity study is provided, so the claimed comprehensiveness of the database is tied to these values.
  • Distance metric thresholds = d_thr_v = 60 m/s, intermediate = 70 m/s
    Chosen to limit computational cost and define the mission-specific subset; the choice is not derived from mission requirements and no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • Minimum revolution filter = 2 revolutions
    Algorithm 3 line 26 keeps only BCs with 2+ revolutions to focus on robust insertions; this is a mission-design choice, not a dynamical requirement.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption CR3BP assumptions: point-mass primaries on circular orbits, negligible spacecraft mass
    Explicitly stated in Section II.A; the entire ETD and capture database are computed in this model.
  • ad hoc to paper Capture set varies continuously with z and zeta, so expanding the search polygon from the previous parameter slice covers all ballistic captures
    Algorithms 1 and 2 initialize the search space as the previous capture set and enlarge it by a fixed offset until no BCs are found; no proof rules out disconnected capture regions appearing between parameter steps.
  • domain assumption Rotopulsating frame transformation from [25,26] gives a close match between CR3BP and ephemeris initial conditions
    Section V.A relies on this transformation to convert single initial conditions; the paper characterizes it as approximate but does not quantify the mismatch beyond the 98% transition success rate.
  • domain assumption Distance metric assumptions (small element changes, maneuvers at perigee/apogee, node, or 90 deg after node)
    Table 5 lists the assumptions; the paper acknowledges the metric is approximate and validates it on only two cases.
  • domain assumption Unspecified ODE solver accurately propagates capture/escape dynamics over the integration horizons
    The paper does not state the integrator, tolerance, or step-size control used for the millions of propagations, so numerical reliability is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extensive Database of Spatial Ballistic Captures with Application to Lunar Trailblazer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KQI3VM6A

@misc{pith2026250609584,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extensive Database of Spatial Ballistic Captures with Application to Lunar Trailblazer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KQI3VM6A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09584}
}
read the original abstract

For low-energy missions to the Moon and beyond, Ballistic Capture has proven to be a valuable technique for enabling orbital insertion while alleviating propulsion system requirements. This approach offers two key advantages. First, it extends the insertion window, allowing multiple maneuver opportunities to mitigate potential failures at the nominal insertion point. Second, it enables the required insertion maneuver to be distributed across multiple revolutions, reducing propulsion system constraints in terms of single-burn thrust. Prior research introduced the concept of Energy Transition Domain to support the creation of a comprehensive database of Ballistic Captures in the planar Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem. However, to apply these trajectories to a real mission scenario, a three-dimensional, spatial analysis and transition to an ephemeris model are necessary. This paper first extends the Energy Transition Domain framework to the spatial case, constructing an extensive database of spatial Ballistic Captures. Then, using Lunar Trailblazer as a case study, a subset of the trajectories is filtered using a mission-specific distance metric, and transitioned into an ephemeris model. Finally, interesting features of this subset are analyzed, and sample high-fidelity trajectories are selected as potential backup options for Lunar Trailblazer.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    Ballistic Capture Analysis using the Energy Transition Domain,

    Anoè, L., Bombardelli, C., and Armellin, R., “Ballistic Capture Analysis using the Energy Transition Domain,”Journal of Guidance, Control,andDynamics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2024, pp. 666–684. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G007730

    work page doi:10.2514/1.g007730 2024

  2. [1]

    Earth–Mars transfers with ballistic capture,

    Topputo, F., and Belbruno, E., “Earth–Mars transfers with ballistic capture,”CelestialMechanicsandDynamical Astronomy, Vol. 121, No. 4, 2015, pp. 329–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-015-9605-8

    doi:10.1007/s10569-015-9605-8 2015

  3. [2]

    Method to design ballistic capture in the elliptic restricted three-body problem,

    Hyeraci, N., and Topputo, F., “Method to design ballistic capture in the elliptic restricted three-body problem,”Journal of guidance, control,anddynamics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1814–1823. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.49263

    doi:10.2514/1.49263 2010

  4. [3]

    Survey of Mars ballistic capture trajectories using periodic orbits as generating mechanisms,

    Dei Tos, D. A., Russell, R. P., and Topputo, F., “Survey of Mars ballistic capture trajectories using periodic orbits as generating mechanisms,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2018, pp. 1227–1242. https://doi.org/http: //doi.org/10.2514/1.G003158

    doi:10.2514/1.g003158 2018

  5. [4]

    Low energy transfer to the Moon,

    Koon, W. S., Lo, M. W., Marsden, J. E., and Ross, S. D., “Low energy transfer to the Moon,”Celestial Mechanics and DynamicalAstronomy, Vol. 81, No. 1-2, 2001, pp. 63–73

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    Low energy interplanetary transfers exploiting invariant manifolds of the restricted three-body problem,

    Topputo, F., Vasile, M., and Bernelli-Zazzera, F., “Low energy interplanetary transfers exploiting invariant manifolds of the restricted three-body problem,”The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2005, pp. 353–372. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1007/BF03546358

    work page doi:10.1007/bf03546358 2005

  7. [6]

    Orbital maneuvers using gravitational capture times,

    Winter, O., Vieira Neto, E., and Prado, A., “Orbital maneuvers using gravitational capture times,”AdvancesinSpaceResearch, Vol. 31, No. 8, 2003, pp. 2005–2010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)00176-5, integrated Space Geodetic Systems and Satellite Dynamics

    work page doi:10.1016/s0273-1177(03)00176-5 2003

  8. [7]

    Captureandescapeintheellipticrestrictedthree-bodyproblem,

    Astakhov,S.A.,andFarrelly,D.,“Captureandescapeintheellipticrestrictedthree-bodyproblem,” MonthlyNoticesoftheRoyal AstronomicalSociety, Vol. 354, No. 4, 2004, pp. 971–979. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08280.x

    arXiv 2004

Show all 31 references
  1. [8]

    Constructing ballistic capture orbits in the real Solar System model,

    Luo, Z.-F., Topputo, F., Bernelli-Zazzera, F., and Tang, G.-J., “Constructing ballistic capture orbits in the real Solar System model,”Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 120, No. 4, 2014, pp. 433–450. https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10569-014-9580-5

    2014 doi

  2. [9]

    Low-Thrust Cis-Lunar Transfers exploiting Ballistic Capture Trajectories,

    Chaudhary, Y., Holt, H., Anoè, L., Bombardelli, C., and Armellin, R., “Low-Thrust Cis-Lunar Transfers exploiting Ballistic Capture Trajectories,”AIAASCITECH 2024Forum, 2024, p. 0837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-0837

    2024 doi

  3. [10]

    An Earth-Mars microsatellite mission leveraging low-energy capture and low-thrust propulsion,

    Carletta, S., Pontani, M., and Teofilatto, P., “An Earth-Mars microsatellite mission leveraging low-energy capture and low-thrust propulsion,”ActaAstronautica, Vol. 200, 2022, pp. 635–646. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.09.034

    2022 doi

  4. [11]

    The role of the mass ratio in ballistic capture,

    Luo, Z.-F., “The role of the mass ratio in ballistic capture,”Monthly Notices of the RoyalAstronomical Society, Vol. 498, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1515–1529. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2366

    2020 doi

  5. [12]

    Low-thrust approach and gravitational capture at Mercury,

    Jehn, R., Campagnola, S., Garcia, D., and Kemble, S., “Low-thrust approach and gravitational capture at Mercury,”18th International SymposiumonSpace FlightDynamics, Vol. 548, 2004, p. 487. 45

    2004

  6. [13]

    Temporarily Captured Asteroids as a Pathway to Affordable Asteroid Retrieval Missions,

    Urrutxua, H., Scheeres, D. J., Bombardelli, C., Gonzalo, J. L., and Pelaez, J., “Temporarily Captured Asteroids as a Pathway to Affordable Asteroid Retrieval Missions,”Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 11, 2015, pp. 2132–2145. https://doi.org/https://doi...

    2015 doi

  7. [14]

    A look at the capture mechanisms of the “temporarily captured asteroids

    Urrutxua, H., and Bombardelli, C., “A look at the capture mechanisms of the “temporarily captured asteroids” of the earth,” 26th International SymposiumonSpaceFlight Dynamics,ISSFD-2017, Vol. 74, 2017, pp. 1–7

    2017

  8. [15]

    The population of natural Earth satellites,

    Granvik, M., Vaubaillon, J., and Jedicke, R., “The population of natural Earth satellites,”Icarus, Vol. 218, No. 1, 2012, pp. 262–277. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.12.003

    2012 doi

  9. [16]

    Orbit and size distributions for asteroids temporarily captured by the Earth-Moon system,

    Fedorets, G., Granvik, M., and Jedicke, R., “Orbit and size distributions for asteroids temporarily captured by the Earth-Moon system,”Icarus, Vol. 285, 2017, pp. 83–94. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.12.022

    2017 doi

  10. [17]

    Establishing Earth’s minimoon population through characterization of asteroid 2020 CD3,

    Fedorets, G., Micheli, M., Jedicke, R., Naidu, S. P., Farnocchia, D., Granvik, M., Moskovitz, N., Schwamb, M. E., Weryk, R., Wierzchoś, K., et al., “Establishing Earth’s minimoon population through characterization of asteroid 2020 CD3,”The AstronomicalJournal, Vol. 160, No. 6...

    2020 doi

  11. [18]

    Targeting ballistic lunar capture trajectories using periodic orbits,

    Griesemer, P. R., Ocampo, C., and Cooley, D., “Targeting ballistic lunar capture trajectories using periodic orbits,”Journal of guidance, control,anddynamics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2011, pp. 893–902. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/1.46843

    2011 doi

  12. [19]

    Calculation of weak stability boundary ballistic lunar transfer trajectories,

    Belbruno, E., and Carrico, J., “Calculation of weak stability boundary ballistic lunar transfer trajectories,”Astrodynamics SpecialistConference, 2000, p. 4142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4142

    doi

  13. [20]

    Fast Earth–Moon transfers with ballistic capture,

    Sousa-Silva, P., Terra, M. O., and Ceriotti, M., “Fast Earth–Moon transfers with ballistic capture,”Astrophysicsand Space Science, Vol. 363, 2018, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-018-3431-x

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Ancillary Data Services of NASA’s Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility,

    Acton, C., “Ancillary Data Services of NASA’s Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility,”Planetary andSpace Scienc, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1996, pp. 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7

    1996 doi

  15. [23]

    H.,Anintroductionto themathematics andmethodsof astrodynamics, Aiaa, 1999, pp

    Battin, R. H.,Anintroductionto themathematics andmethodsof astrodynamics, Aiaa, 1999, pp. 379–381

    1999

  16. [24]

    Low energy transit orbits in the restricted three-body problems,

    Conley, C., “Low energy transit orbits in the restricted three-body problems,”SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, Vol. 16, No. 4, 1968, pp. 732–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/0116060

    1968 doi

  17. [25]

    Trajectory refinement of three-body orbits in the real solar system model,

    Dei Tos, D. A., and Topputo, F., “Trajectory refinement of three-body orbits in the real solar system model,”AdvancesinSpace Research, Vol. 59, No. 8, 2017, pp. 2117–2132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.039

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Assessment of dynamical models for transitioning from the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem to an ephemeris model with applications,

    Park, B., and Howell, K. C., “Assessment of dynamical models for transitioning from the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem to an ephemeris model with applications,”Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 136, No. 1, 2024, p. 6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10....

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    A.,Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001, Vol

    Vallado, D. A.,Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001, Vol. 12, pp. 116–118

    2001

  20. [28]

    Fundamentals of astrodynamics,

    Wakker, K. F., “Fundamentals of astrodynamics,”TU Delft Repository,Delft, 2015, pp. 604–612. URL https://resolver.tudelft. nl/uuid:3fc91471-8e47-4215-af43-718740e6694e

    2015

  21. [29]

    Numerical exploration of the restricted problem, V,

    Hénon, M., “Numerical exploration of the restricted problem, V,”Astronomyand Astrophysics,vol. 1, p. 223-238 (1969)., Vol. 1, 1969, pp. 223–238

    1969

  22. [30]

    Clustering Approach To Identifying Low Lunar Frozen Orbits In A High-Fidelity Model,

    Miceli, G. E., Bosanac, N., Mesarch, M. A., Folta, D. C., and Mesarch, R. L., “Clustering Approach To Identifying Low Lunar Frozen Orbits In A High-Fidelity Model,”2023 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, 2023. URL https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230010615

    2023

  23. [31]

    TemporaryCapturesinEarth-MoonSystem: ATaxonomyDesignusingMachineLearning,

    Wolfe,S.,andEmami,M.R.,“TemporaryCapturesinEarth-MoonSystem: ATaxonomyDesignusingMachineLearning,” The Journal oftheAstronauticalSciences, Vol. 71, No. 6, 2024, p. 52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-024-00473-4. 47 Appendices A. Sample trajectories initial cond...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.