Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 165 references

HETDEX Public Data Release 1: Source Catalog 2 and Data Cubes from ~90 sq deg of Integral-Field Optical Spectroscopy

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read HETDEX Public Data Release 1 catalogs 426,654 LAEs plus 491,411 OII emitters with positions, redshifts and spectra

desk verdict This is a standard data release paper that adds four years of HETDEX observations and new classifiers to produce a larger public catalog, but the class counts depend on unshown classifier performance. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.04208 v1 pith:KRVKXHUH submitted 2026-06-02 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Erin Mentuch Cooper , Karl Gebhardt , Dustin Davis , Chenxu Liu , Barbara G. Castanheira , Owen Chase , Oscar A. Chavez Ortiz , Robin Ciardullo
show 31 more authors
Olivia Curtis Delaney A. Dunne Neal J. Evans II Daniel J. Farrow Maximilian Fabricius Steven L. Finkelstein Caryl Gronwall Nathaniel J. Hamme Gary J. Hill Lindsay R. House Matt J. Jarvis Donghui Jeong Andreas Kelz Eiichiro Komatsu Mahan Mirza Khanlari Hasti Khoraminezhad Wolfram Kollatschny Maja Lujan Niemeyer Hanshin Lee Phillip MacQueen Deeshani Mitra Shiro Mukae Masami Ouchi Jennifer Poppe Meredith C. Powell Mahdi Qezlou Shun Saito Donald P. Schneider Laurel Weiss Lutz Wisotzki Gregory R. Zeimann
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords HETDEXLyman-alphaemittersemission-linegalaxiesintegral-fieldspectroscopypublicdatareleasesourcecataloglarge-scalestructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents the first public data release from the HETDEX integral-field spectroscopic survey of the sky. HPSC2 expands prior catalogs with four more years of data, new machine learning classifiers, and better quality control to classify and deliver coordinates, redshifts or velocities, and 1D spectra for 426,654 Lyman-alpha emitters at 1.88 < z < 3.52, 491,411 OII emitters, and additional low-redshift galaxies, AGN, and stars. The release covers 86.67 square degrees of non-contiguous fields plus legacy regions and supplies the associated data cubes. A sympathetic reader cares because the untargeted sample supplies ready-to-use data for mapping large-scale structure at cosmic noon without new telescope time.

What carries the argument

HPSC2, the reprocessed source catalog that applies machine learning classifiers and quality control to integral-field spectra to separate and characterize emission-line sources.

What would settle it

Independent spectroscopic follow-up of a random subsample from each class that finds contamination rates substantially above those implied by the catalog would falsify the separation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

HPSC2 contains 426,654 LAEs, 491,411 [O II] emitters, 19,457 low-z galaxies, 18,303 active galactic nuclei, and 150,608 stars, providing coordinates, redshifts or stellar velocities, and 1D spectra for each source. The catalog derives from 431,713 IFU observations covering 86.67 sq deg and incorporates improved quality control plus new machine learning classifiers on four additional years of data.

Load-bearing premise

The machine learning classifiers and quality control procedures correctly separate the different source classes with low contamination.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The catalog supplies ready positions and spectra for statistical studies of LAE clustering over large volumes at 1.88 < z < 3.52.
  • 1D spectra enable direct measurement of line properties and velocities for each classified object.
  • Inclusion of legacy fields such as COSMOS allows direct cross-matching with multi-wavelength data from other surveys.
  • Public data cubes support searches for faint emission lines, though local sky subtraction limits use for absolute surface brightness or very extended sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scale of the LAE sample may support tighter constraints on the growth of structure once clustering measurements are performed.
  • Raw detection databases released with the catalog allow external teams to test alternative classification methods.
  • The non-contiguous sky coverage suggests that future contiguous extensions could improve measurements of very large-scale modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents HETDEX Public Data Release 1 (PDR1), consisting of 431,713 IFU observations over 86.67 sq deg and the HETDEX Public Source Catalog 2 (HPSC2). HPSC2 reports 426,654 LAEs, 491,411 [O II] emitters, 19,457 low-z galaxies, 18,303 AGN, and 150,608 stars, each with coordinates, redshifts/velocities, and 1D spectra, derived from new ML classifiers and improved QC on four additional years of data. Data cubes, a 1.6M-candidate LAE sample, and raw databases are also released via the HETDEX portal and Zenodo.

Significance. If the source classifications hold, PDR1 supplies one of the largest public samples of high-redshift LAEs for large-scale structure and dark-energy studies at cosmic noon, together with supporting [O II] and stellar samples. Public access to cubes, spectra, and a JupyterLab environment directly supports community re-use and reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / HPSC2 description] Abstract and HPSC2 processing description: the headline source counts (426,654 LAEs etc.) are the direct output of the new ML classifiers and QC pipeline, yet no purity, completeness, contamination fractions, training-set sizes, or test-set performance metrics are supplied. Without these numbers the reliability of the class separations cannot be assessed and the catalog contents remain unverifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review of the manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will make the requested additions to improve the verifiability of the catalog.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / HPSC2 description] Abstract and HPSC2 processing description: the headline source counts (426,654 LAEs etc.) are the direct output of the new ML classifiers and QC pipeline, yet no purity, completeness, contamination fractions, training-set sizes, or test-set performance metrics are supplied. Without these numbers the reliability of the class separations cannot be assessed and the catalog contents remain unverifiable.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative performance metrics are necessary to allow readers to assess the reliability of the ML-based classifications in HPSC2. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (placed after the description of the new classifiers) that reports: (i) sizes of the training and validation sets used for each classifier, (ii) test-set performance metrics including precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion-matrix summaries obtained via cross-validation, and (iii) estimated purity, completeness, and contamination fractions for the five source classes. These values will be presented both in the text and in a summary table. The added material will be drawn from the internal validation analyses already performed during classifier development and will be placed in the main text rather than an appendix so that the headline counts can be interpreted in context. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: observational catalog release with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is a data-release paper presenting an observational catalog (HPSC2) derived from raw IFU spectra via processing pipelines, ML classifiers, and QC. No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains are present in the provided text. The source counts are direct outputs of the described pipeline applied to new observations; they do not reduce to prior results by construction. External validation metrics are absent, but that is a correctness issue, not circularity. The paper is self-contained as an empirical release.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a data release paper whose contribution is the catalog and processed cubes rather than new theoretical constructs or fitted parameters.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in astronomical data reduction and source detection for integral-field spectroscopy hold for the HETDEX pipeline.
    The release relies on established IFU processing techniques without stating new axioms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HETDEX Public Data Release 1: Source Catalog 2 and Data Cubes from ~90 sq deg of Integral-Field Optical Spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KRVKXHUH

@misc{pith2026260604208,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HETDEX Public Data Release 1: Source Catalog 2 and Data Cubes from ~90 sq deg of Integral-Field Optical Spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KRVKXHUH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.04208}
}
read the original abstract

The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX) is a wide-field, integral-field spectroscopic survey designed to map the large-scale distribution of Lyman-alpha emitting galaxies (LAEs) at 1.88 < z < 3.52 and constrain dark energy at cosmic noon. Using the 10-m Hobby-Eberly Telescope and the Visible Integral-Field Replicable Unit (IFU) Spectrograph, HETDEX obtains >35,000 spectra per exposure over 3500-5500 {\AA} at R~800 with ~1.8 arcsec image quality, enabling an untargeted census of emission-line galaxies across 540 sq deg. We present HETDEX Public Data Release 1 (PDR1), comprising 431,713 IFU observations covering 86.67 sq deg of noncontiguous sky in the Spring (13h, +51{\deg}) and Fall (1.5h, 0{\deg}) fields, along with legacy regions (COSMOS, GOODS-N, NEP, SA22). PDR1 includes the HETDEX Public Source Catalog 2 (HPSC2), an expanded and reprocessed version of Mentuch Cooper et al. (2023) incorporating four additional years of data, improved quality control, and new machine learning classifiers. HPSC2 contains 426,654 LAEs, 491,411 [O II] emitters, 19,457 low-z galaxies, 18,303 active galactic nuclei, and 150,608 stars, providing coordinates, redshifts or stellar velocities, and 1D spectra for each source. Because the data cubes use local sky subtraction optimized for faint emission-line detection, they are not suited for absolute surface-brightness measurements or very extended nearby galaxies. Appendix materials include the full detection catalog, the 1.6 million-candidate LAE sample, and raw detection databases. All products are publicly accessible through the HETDEX data portal (https://hetdex.org/data-results/), including access to a public JupyterLab. HPSC2 is also publicly available via Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19581262).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04208 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Projected distribution of Lyα emitters (‘lae’, red), active galactic nuclei (‘agn’, purple), [O ii] emitters (‘oii’, blue) and low-redshift, non-emission-line galaxies (‘lzg’, green) in comoving space, collapsed in decl. Radial labels indicate comoving distance in Mpc, with corresponding redshift ticks annotated along the wedge. Clustering is evident at low redshift among [O ii] emitters and passive low-z galaxies, … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Outline of the two main HETDEX science fields (in red) and the footprint of IFU data cubes in this data release. Colors indicate the image quality of individual VIRUS IFU pointings, quantified as the FWHM of the point-spread-function (PSF) in arcseconds. Fields are (1) the high declination Spring Field (top), which is centered at (13.5h , +51◦ ) and covers ∼ 390 deg2 of the sky, and (2) the equatorial Fall Field (mi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Coverage of the four legacy fields included in this release: NEP, COSMOS, SA22, and GOODS-N. Colors indicate the image quality of individual VIRUS IFU pointings (FWHM in arcseconds). The bar in each panel indicates the image scale. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This example demonstrates how large extended sources, such as the planetary nebulae PN G136.7+61.9 displayed here, are identified and masked to prevent false emission-line detections in the catalog and data cubes. Left panel: collapsed data cube highlighting the [O III…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between aperture-corrected, extracted spectra of LAEs (with their emission wavelength indicated by the grey dashed vertical line) from the internal data model (shown in purple dashed line) and the public data model (shown in blue solid line). The internal sp…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Biweight average flux ratio spectrum comparing SDSS and HETDEX observations of 8,076 AGN. Each spec￾trum was Gaussian-smoothed (σ = 5 pixels) before comput￾ing the flux ratio SDSS/HETDEX at each wavelength. The solid green line shows the biweight location of the flux r…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The redshift distribution of the low-z (∆zbin = 0.01) and high-z (∆zbin = 0.02) galaxy samples in the top and bottom panels, respectively. The low-z sample is a com￾bination of [O II] emitters and LZGs; the high-z dataset in￾cludes LAEs and AGNs. The brightest sky line…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of HETDEX redshifts with ex￾ternal spectroscopic measurements in the COSMOS legacy field compiled by Khostovan et al. (2026) and visual spectro￾scopic confirmation from DESI–HETDEX (Landriau et al. 2025). Top panel: direct comparison between zHETDEX and zspe…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Histogram of gHETDEX magnitudes for each source type as measured by summing the 1D extracted spec￾tra, weighted by the SDSS g-band response curve. If mul￾tiple detections exist for the source, the brightest detection is used. The vertical dashed line at gHETDEX=25 repr…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Examples of [O II] line-flux maps (shown in contours) that are used to measure continuum-subtracted [O II] fluxes for spatially resolved low-redshift galaxies. Elliptical apertures are defined using imaging data from HSC or DECALs as measured in the ELiXer catalog (Da…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: RAIC Labs classification label sets used for HETDEX detections. Panel (a) shows the classes applied to emission￾line cutouts, while panel (b) shows the classes for continuum cutouts. stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE), operating on a ±50 ˚A window centered on the …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The y-axis represents the fraction of LAEs that are confirmed from multiple methods (repeat HETDEX ob￾servations, ancillary spectroscopic and narrowband confir￾mation). The x-axis indicates total LAE count from the full LAE catalog based on the plotted thresholds. We …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Structure of the HETDEX Public Data Release 1 (PDR1) IFU data cubes. Each cube is stored in a FITS file named dex cube <SHOTID> <IFUSLOT>.fits, where SHOTID identifies the observation and IFUSLOT the IFU. Cubes have dimensions of 1036 × 104 × 104 (wavelength × spatial…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Example HETDEX IFU data cube visualization using the CubeWidget tool for shotid = 20190405020, ifuslot = 034. The left panel shows a 2 ˚A wide spectral region at λ = 4518 ˚A, overlaid with circular apertures marking three sources. The right panel displays the extracte…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Example aperture-extracted spectra of an AGN in COSMOS at R.A.=150.23189◦ , decl.=2.36396◦ using a 3. ′′5 circular aperture. The source is observed multiple times across HETDEX, showing clear evidence of variability. In early observations from 2018, strong Lyα emissio…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Collapsing the HETDEX data cubes into pseudo-narrowband (Lyα, λ = 3563 ˚A ±50 ˚A) and continuum (3800–5200 ˚A) images for the example changing-look AGN in COSMOS shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

165 extracted references · 140 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    , keywords =

    Detection of Lyman Continuum from 3.0 < z < 3.5 Galaxies in the HETDEX Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1598 , archivePrefix =. 2107.11319 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1598

  2. [7]

    , title =

    Van Rossum, Guido and Drake, Fred L. , title =. 2009 , isbn =

    2009

  3. [8]

    Atomic Data for Resonance Absorption Lines. I. Wavelengths Longward of the Lyman Limit. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/191601 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/191601

  4. [11]

    The Evolution of the Galaxy Rest-Frame Ultraviolet Luminosity Function Over the First Two Billion Years

    The Evolution of the Galaxy Rest-frame Ultraviolet Luminosity Function over the First Two Billion Years. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/71 , archivePrefix =. 1410.5439 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/71

  5. [14]

    , keywords =

    First HETDEX Spectroscopic Determinations of Ly and UV Luminosity Functions at z = 2-3: Bridging a Gap between Faint AGNs and Bright Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1e97 , archivePrefix =. 2105.11497 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1e97

  6. [15]

    The Spitzer-HETDEX Exploratory Large Area Survey. II. The Dark Energy Camera and Spitzer/IRAC Multiwavelength Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaee85 , archivePrefix =. 1812.04646 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaee85

  7. [17]

    The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results From Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging

    The Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey: Initial Results from Optical and Near-Infrared Imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/379232 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0309105 , primaryClass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1086/379232

  8. [20]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Show all 165 references
  1. [21]

    Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies

  2. [22]

    Uppsala general catalogue of galaxies

  3. [23]

    , keywords =

    The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 , archivePrefix =. 0812.0649 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  4. [33]

    , keywords =

    The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0311060 , primaryClass =

    2004 doi

  5. [34]

    Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology , year = 2014, volume =

    Low/High Redshift Classification of Emission Line Galaxies in the HETDEX survey. Statistical Challenges in 21st Century Cosmology , year = 2014, volume =. doi:10.1017/S1743921314013805 , archivePrefix =. 1411.2651 , primaryClass =

    2014 doi arXiv

  6. [36]

    , keywords =

    Measures of Location and Scale for Velocities in Clusters of Galaxies---A Robust Approach. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/115487 , adsurl =

    doi

  7. [37]

    arXiv , Author =:1705.06766 , Journal =

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psx080 , Eid =. arXiv , Author =:1705.06766 , Journal =

    doi arXiv

  8. [38]

    arXiv , Arxivurl =:1304.5537 , Journal =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/83 , Eid =. arXiv , Arxivurl =:1304.5537 , Journal =

    doi arXiv

  9. [39]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of Ly -emitting Galaxies between z = 2.1 and z = 3.1. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/110 , archivePrefix =. 1109.4685 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  10. [40]

    , keywords =

    Correcting correlation functions for redshift-dependent interloper contamination. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1986 , archivePrefix =. 2104.04613 , primaryClass =

    doi

  11. [41]

    and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=

    Foreman-Mackey, Daniel and Hogg, David W. and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=. emcee: The MCMC Hammer , volume=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , publisher=. doi:10.1086/670067 , number=

    doi

  12. [43]

    Verhamme, A and Garel, T and Ventou, E and Contini, T and Bouché, N and Herenz, EC and Richard, J and Bacon, R and Schmidt, KB and Maseda, M and et al. , year=. Recovering the systemic redshift of galaxies from their Lyman alpha line profile , volume=. Monthly Notices of the R...

    doi

  13. [44]

    in prep , doi =

    , journal =. in prep , doi =

  14. [48]

    Stellar Populations of Ly -emitting Galaxies in the HETDEX Survey. I. An Analysis of LAEs in the GOODS-N Field. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8546 , archivePrefix =. 2208.01660 , primaryClass =

    doi

  15. [49]

    Jean-Charles J. Cuillandre and Kanoa Withington and Patrick Hudelot and Yuliana Goranova and Henry McCracken and Frédéric Magnard and Yannick Mellier and Nicolas Regnault and Marc Bétoule and Hervé Aussel and J. J. Kavelaars and Pierre Fernique and François Bonnarel and Franco...

    2012

  16. [50]

    Grogin and Dale D

    Norman A. Grogin and Dale D. Kocevski and S. M. Faber and Henry C. Ferguson and Anton M. Koekemoer and Adam G. Riess and Viviana Acquaviva and David M. Alexander and Omar Almaini and Matthew L. N. Ashby and Marco Barden and Eric F. Bell and Fr. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35 , url =

    doi

  17. [52]

    , keywords =

    The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 , archivePrefix =. 1704.05858 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  18. [53]

    , keywords =

    The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1 < z < 6 Universe with Half a Million Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/24 , archivePrefix =. 1604.02350 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  19. [54]

    2019 , eprint=

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  20. [55]

    , keywords =

    The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog: Fourteenth data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732445 , archivePrefix =. 1712.05029 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  21. [56]

    , keywords =

    The 16th Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: First Release from the APOGEE-2 Southern Survey and Full Release of eBOSS Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e , archivePrefix =. 1912.02905 , primaryClass =

    1912 doi

  22. [57]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  23. [58]

    2020 , journal=

    speclite , author=. 2020 , journal=

    2020

  24. [59]

    , keywords =

    SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 , adsurl =

    doi

  25. [63]

    , keywords =

    The DEIMOS 10K Spectroscopic Survey Catalog of the COSMOS Field. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabacf , archivePrefix =. 1803.09251 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  26. [64]

    , keywords =

    The MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) Survey: Rest-frame Optical Spectroscopy for -0.5ex 1500 H-selected Galaxies at 1.37 < z < 3.8. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/15 , archivePrefix =. 1412.1835 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  27. [65]

    , keywords =

    The zCOSMOS 10k-Bright Spectroscopic Sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/184/2/218 , adsurl =

    doi

  28. [66]

    , keywords =

    The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Keck/DEIMOS Spectroscopy in the GOODS-N Field. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/193/1/14 , archivePrefix =. 1101.4018 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  29. [67]

    , keywords =

    The 3D-HST Survey: Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/G141 Grism Spectra, Redshifts, and Emission Line Measurements for -0.5ex 100,000 Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/27 , archivePrefix =. 1510.02106 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  30. [68]

    , keywords =

    The Team Keck Treasury Redshift Survey of the GOODS-North Field. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/420999 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0401353 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  31. [69]

    , keywords =

    The Team Keck Redshift Survey 2: MOSFIRE Spectroscopy of the GOODS-North Field. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/153 , archivePrefix =. 1509.07172 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  32. [70]

    , keywords =

    Early-Type Galaxies in the PEARS Survey: Probing the Stellar Populations at Moderate Redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/158 , archivePrefix =. 0908.0739 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  33. [71]

    Emission-line Galaxies from the Hubble Space Telescope Probing Evolution and Reionization Spectroscopically (PEARS) Grism Survey. II. The Complete Sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/48 , archivePrefix =. 1208.5535 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  34. [72]

    , keywords =

    A Spectroscopic Survey of Redshift 1.4< -0.5ex < -0.5ex 3.0 Galaxies in the GOODS-North Field: Survey Description, Catalogs, and Properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/508851 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0609296 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  35. [73]

    , keywords =

    A Highly Complete Spectroscopic Survey of the GOODS-N Field. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/592735 , archivePrefix =. 0812.2481 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  36. [75]

    , keywords =

    COSMOS2020: A Panchromatic View of the Universe to z 10 from Two Complementary Catalogs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078 , archivePrefix =. 2110.13923 , primaryClass =

    doi

  37. [78]

    , year = 1974, month = feb, volume =

    Absolute Spectral Energy Distributions for White Dwarfs. , year = 1974, month = feb, volume =. doi:10.1086/190287 , adsurl =

    1974 doi

  38. [79]

    , keywords =

    The Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation: Insights from 53,000 Star-forming Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/423264 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405537 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  39. [80]

    , keywords =

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Large-scale structure catalogues for cosmological analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2416 , archivePrefix =. 2007.09000 , primaryClass =

    2007 doi

  40. [81]

    , year = 1969, month = dec, volume =

    A Theoretical Investigation of Focal Stellar Images in the Photographic Emulsion and Application to Photographic Photometry. , year = 1969, month = dec, volume =

    1969

  41. [83]

    astropy/photutils: 1.0.0 , month = sep, year = 2020, publisher =

    Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sip. astropy/photutils: 1.0.0 , month = sep, year = 2020, publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4044744 , url =

    2020 doi

  42. [85]

    , keywords =

    Hyper Suprime-Cam: System design and verification of image quality. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx063 , adsurl =

    doi

  43. [97]

    , keywords =

    Ly -Emitting Galaxies at z = 3.1: L* Progenitors Experiencing Rapid Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/522955 , archivePrefix =. 0710.2697 , primaryClass =

    doi

  44. [102]

    , keywords =

    Unbiased Cosmological Parameter Estimation from Emission-line Surveys with Interlopers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d5 , archivePrefix =. 1811.06982 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  45. [103]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function at z = 4-8: A Steepening Low-mass-end Slope with Increasing Redshift. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/5 , archivePrefix =. 1507.05636 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  46. [104]

    , keywords =

    The Spectrally Resolved Ly Emission of Three Ly -selected Field Galaxies at z -0.5ex 2.4 from the HETDEX Pilot Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/99 , archivePrefix =. 1308.1957 , primaryClass =

    1957 doi arXiv

  47. [105]

    , keywords =

    The Kinematics of Multiple-peaked Ly Emission in Star-forming Galaxies at z -0.5ex 2-3. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/33 , archivePrefix =. 1107.4367 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  48. [106]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of the Stellar Mass Functions of Star-forming and Quiescent Galaxies to z = 4 from the COSMOS/UltraVISTA Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18 , archivePrefix =. 1303.4409 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  49. [107]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of the Stellar Mass Function of Galaxies from z = 4.0 and the First Comprehensive Analysis of its Uncertainties: Evidence for Mass-Dependent Evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1765 , archivePrefix =. 0811.1773 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  50. [109]

    , keywords =

    A Spectroscopic Follow-up Program of Very Massive Galaxies at 3 < z < 4: Confirmation of Spectroscopic Redshifts, and a High Fraction of Powerful AGNs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7206 , archivePrefix =. 1606.05350 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  51. [110]

    , keywords =

    A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Survey of K-Selected Galaxies at z -0.5ex 2.3: Redshifts and Implications for Broadband Photometric Studies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/528945 , archivePrefix =. 0801.1110 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  52. [112]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    J-PAS: The Javalambre-Physics of the Accelerated Universe Astrophysical Survey. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  53. [115]

    , keywords =

    Third data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 , archivePrefix =. 2108.13045 , primaryClass =

    doi

  54. [116]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =

    Design, construction, and performance of VIRUS-P: the prototype of a highly replicated integral-field spectrograph for HET. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.790235 , adsurl =

    2008 doi

  55. [120]

    Dr Dobb's J Software Tools Prof Program , volume=

    HDF: The hierarchical data format , author=. Dr Dobb's J Software Tools Prof Program , volume=

  56. [121]

    , keywords =

    HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/427976 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0409513 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  57. [125]

    2002 , url =

    PyTables: Hierarchical Datasets in Python , author =. 2002 , url =

    2002

  58. [130]

    , year = 1981, month = jun, volume =

    FITS - a Flexible Image Transport System. , year = 1981, month = jun, volume =

    1981

  59. [133]

    Diagnose: Spectral classification code

  60. [143]

    and Varoquaux, G

    Pedregosa, F. and Varoquaux, G. and Gramfort, A. and Michel, V. and Thirion, B. and Grisel, O. and Blondel, M. and Prettenhofer, P. and Weiss, R. and Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J. and Passos, A. and Cournapeau, D. and Brucher, M. and Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. , journal=. S...

  61. [154]

    2022, , 164, 207, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b

    Abareshi , B., Aguilar , J., Ahlen , S., et al. 2022, , 164, 207, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b

    2022 doi

  62. [155]

    J., Blanc , G

    Adams , J. J., Blanc , G. A., Hill , G. J., et al. 2011, , 192, 5, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/5

    2011 doi

  63. [156]

    2002, PyTables: Hierarchical Datasets in Python

    Alted, F., Vilata, I., et al. 2002, PyTables: Hierarchical Datasets in Python. https://www.pytables.org/

    2002

  64. [157]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  65. [158]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  66. [159]

    2015, , 575, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425419

    Bacon , R., Brinchmann , J., Richard , J., et al. 2015, , 575, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425419

    2015 doi

  67. [160]

    2016, Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 58, 10.21105/joss.00058

    Barbary, K. 2016, Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 58, 10.21105/joss.00058

    2016 doi

  68. [161]

    2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1403.5237

    Benitez , N., Dupke , R., Moles , M., et al. 2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1403.5237. 1403.5237

    2014 arXiv

  69. [162]

    2021, , 653, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038841

    Bonoli , S., Mar \' n-Franch , A., Varela , J., et al. 2021, , 653, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038841

    2021 doi

  70. [163]

    2021, Python, 10.5281/zenodo.5796924

    Bradley, L., Sip o cz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2021, Python, 10.5281/zenodo.5796924

    2021 doi

  71. [164]

    A., Law , D

    Bundy , K., Bershady , M. A., Law , D. R., et al. 2015, , 798, 7, 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/7

    2015 doi

  72. [165]

    J., Peletier , R

    Cenarro , A. J., Peletier , R. F., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al. 2007, , 374, 664, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11196.x

    2007 doi

  73. [166]

    A., Finkelstein , S

    Ch \'a vez Ortiz , \'O . A., Finkelstein , S. L., Davis , D., et al. 2023, , 952, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc403

    2023 doi

  74. [167]

    2013, , 2013, 030, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/030

    Chiang , C.-T., Wullstein , P., Jeong , D., et al. 2013, , 2013, 030, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/030

    2013 doi

  75. [168]

    L., & Hu , E

    Cowie , L. L., & Hu , E. M. 1998, , 115, 1319, 10.1086/300309

    1998 doi

  76. [169]

    M., et al

    Davis , D., Gebhardt , K., Cooper , E. M., et al. 2023 a , , 946, 86, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb0ca

    2023 doi

  77. [170]

    2023 b , , 954, 209, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4c2

    ---. 2023 b , , 954, 209, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace4c2

    2023 doi

  78. [171]

    S., Schlegel , D

    Dawson , K. S., Schlegel , D. J., Ahn , C. P., et al. 2013, , 145, 10, 10.1088/0004-6256/145/1/10

    2013 doi

  79. [172]

    S., Kneib , J.-P., Percival , W

    Dawson , K. S., Kneib , J.-P., Percival , W. J., et al. 2016, , 151, 44, 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/44

    2016 doi

  80. [173]

    1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies

    de Vaucouleurs , G., de Vaucouleurs , A., Corwin , Herold G., J., et al. 1991, Third Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies

    1991

  81. [174]

    2024, Diagnose: Spectral classification code , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2411.020

    Debski , M., & Zeimann , G. 2024, Diagnose: Spectral classification code , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2411.020

    2024

  82. [175]

    H., Zeimann , G

    Debski , M. H., Zeimann , G. R., Hill , G. J., et al. 2025, , 978, 101, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad957b

    2025 doi

  83. [176]

    2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036

    DESI Collaboration , Aghamousa , A., Aguilar , J., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036. 1611.00036

    2016 arXiv

  84. [177]

    J., Lang , D., et al

    Dey , A., Schlegel , D. J., Lang , D., et al. 2019, , 157, 168, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    2019 doi

  85. [178]

    Dickinson, M., Giavalisco, M., & team, t. G. 2002, ESO ASTROPHYSICS SYMPOSIA, 324–331, 10.1007/10899892_78

    2002 doi

  86. [179]

    A., et al

    Drory , N., MacDonald , N., Bershady , M. A., et al. 2015, , 149, 77, 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/77

    2015 doi

  87. [180]

    2019, , 484, 4200, 10.1093/mnras/stz204

    Eriksen , M., Alarcon , A., Gaztanaga , E., et al. 2019, , 484, 4200, 10.1093/mnras/stz204

    2019 doi

  88. [181]

    2011, , 532, A95, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116842

    Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Vazdekis , A., et al. 2011, , 532, A95, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116842

    2011 doi

  89. [182]

    M., Gawiser , E., Ramakrishnan , V., et al

    Firestone , N. M., Gawiser , E., Ramakrishnan , V., et al. 2024, , 974, 217, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad71c9

    2024 doi

  90. [183]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, , 111, 63, 10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  91. [184]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051

    2018 doi

  92. [185]

    2021, , 923, 217, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03

    Gebhardt , K., Mentuch Cooper , E., Ciardullo , R., et al. 2021, , 923, 217, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03

    2021 doi

  93. [186]

    2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, 10.21105/joss.00695

    Green , G. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 695, 10.21105/joss.00695

    2018 doi

  94. [187]

    Greisen, E. W. , Calabretta, M. R. , Valdes, F. G. , & Allen, S. L. 2006, A&A, 446, 747, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053818

    2006 doi

  95. [188]

    2007, , 667, 79, 10.1086/520324

    Gronwall , C., Ciardullo , R., Hickey , T., et al. 2007, , 667, 79, 10.1086/520324

    2007 doi

  96. [189]

    R., Behrens , C., et al

    Hagen , A., Zeimann , G. R., Behrens , C., et al. 2016, , 817, 79, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/79

    2016 doi

  97. [190]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  98. [191]

    2021, , 911, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe9bd

    Hawkins , K., Zeimann , G., Sneden , C., et al. 2021, , 911, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe9bd

    2021 doi

  99. [192]

    J., Lee , H., MacQueen , P

    Hill , G. J., Lee , H., MacQueen , P. J., et al. 2021, , 162, 298, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2c02

    2021 doi

  100. [193]

    1986, , 98, 609, 10.1086/131801

    Horne , K. 1986, , 98, 609, 10.1086/131801

    1986 doi

  101. [194]

    R., Gebhardt , K., Finkelstein , K., et al

    House , L. R., Gebhardt , K., Finkelstein , K., et al. 2024, , 975, 172, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad782c

    2024 doi

  102. [195]

    2023, , 950, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/accdd0

    ---. 2023, , 950, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/accdd0

    2023 doi

  103. [196]

    M., & Cowie , L

    Hu , E. M., & Cowie , L. L. 2006, , 440, 1145, 10.1038/nature04806

    2006 doi

  104. [197]

    2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 51254, 10.33232/001c.151254

    Khoraminezhad , H., Saito , S., Gronke , M., & Byrohl , C. 2025, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 8, 51254, 10.33232/001c.151254

    2025 doi

  105. [198]

    A., Kartaltepe , J

    Khostovan , A. A., Kartaltepe , J. S., Salvato , M., et al. 2026, , 282, 6, 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1cb9

    2026 doi

  106. [199]

    2023, , 268, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/ace4cb

    Kikuta , S., Ouchi , M., Shibuya , T., et al. 2023, , 268, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/ace4cb

    2023 doi

  107. [200]

    2016, , 823, 20, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/20

    Konno , A., Ouchi , M., Nakajima , K., et al. 2016, , 823, 20, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/20

    2016 doi

  108. [201]

    2025, , 995, 220, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1ae6

    Landriau , M., Mentuch Cooper , E., Davis , D., et al. 2025, , 995, 220, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1ae6

    2025 doi

  109. [202]

    H., Finkelstein , S

    Laseter , I. H., Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. J., et al. 2022, , 940, 9, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9186

    2022 doi

  110. [203]

    R., Yan , R., Bershady , M

    Law , D. R., Yan , R., Bershady , M. A., et al. 2015, , 150, 19, 10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/19

    2015 doi

  111. [204]

    S., Chang , T.-C., & Dor \'e , O

    Lee , D., Hensley , B. S., Chang , T.-C., & Dor \'e , O. 2025, , 994, 61, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0c12

    2025 doi

  112. [205]

    2024, , 962, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165e

    Lee , K.-S., Gawiser , E., Park , C., et al. 2024, , 962, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165e

    2024 doi

  113. [206]

    S., Acquaviva , V., Gawiser , E., et al

    Leung , A. S., Acquaviva , V., Gawiser , E., et al. 2017, , 843, 130, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa71af

    2017 doi

  114. [207]

    M., et al

    Liu , C., Gebhardt , K., Cooper , E. M., et al. 2022, , 261, 24, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6ba6

    2022 doi

  115. [208]

    2025, , 276, 72, 10.3847/1538-4365/ada4a5

    Liu , C., Gebhardt , K., Mentuch Cooper , E., et al. 2025, , 276, 72, 10.3847/1538-4365/ada4a5

    2025 doi

  116. [209]

    L., et al

    Lujan Niemeyer , M., Komatsu , E., Bernal , J. L., et al. 2026, , 999, 177, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3a98

    2026 doi

  117. [210]

    2023, , 943, 177, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca962

    Mentuch Cooper , E., Gebhardt , K., Davis , D., et al. 2023, , 943, 177, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca962

    2023 doi

  118. [211]

    2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 1000, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae44f3

    Mentuch Cooper , E., Gebhardt, K., Davis, D., et al. 2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 1000, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/ae44f3

    2026 doi

  119. [212]

    H., et al

    Mirza Khanlari , M., Gebhardt , K., Weiss , L. H., et al. 2025, , 989, 169, 10.3847/1538-4357/adf10e

    2025 doi

  120. [213]

    M., Gebhardt , K., et al

    Mukae , S., Cooper , E. M., Gebhardt , K., et al. 2026, , 171, 318, 10.3847/1538-3881/ae5baf

    2026 doi

  121. [214]

    1973, Uppsala general catalogue of galaxies

    Nilson , P. 1973, Uppsala general catalogue of galaxies

    1973

  122. [215]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1983, , 266, 713, 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  123. [216]

    2021, , 911, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/abea15

    Ono , Y., Itoh , R., Shibuya , T., et al. 2021, , 911, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/abea15

    2021 doi

  124. [217]

    2020, , 58, 617, 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021859

    Ouchi , M., Ono , Y., & Shibuya , T. 2020, , 58, 617, 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021859

    2020 doi

  125. [218]

    2008, , 176, 301, 10.1086/527673

    Ouchi , M., Shimasaku , K., Akiyama , M., et al. 2008, , 176, 301, 10.1086/527673

    2008 doi

  126. [219]

    A., Blanc , G

    Oyarz \'u n , G. A., Blanc , G. A., Gonz \'a lez , V., Mateo , M., & Bailey , John I., I. 2017, , 843, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7552

    2017 doi

  127. [220]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Padmanabhan , N., Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., et al. 2008, , 674, 1217, 10.1086/524677

    2008 doi

  128. [221]

    A., Boji c i \'c , I

    Parker , Q. A., Boji c i \'c , I. S., & Frew , D. J. 2016, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 728, Journal of Physics Conference Series (IOP), 032008, 10.1088/1742-6596/728/3/032008

    2016 doi

  129. [222]

    2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  130. [223]

    D., Chiappetti , L., Page , C

    Pence , W. D., Chiappetti , L., Page , C. G., Shaw , R. A., & Stobie , E. 2010, , 524, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015362

    2010 doi

  131. [224]

    2020, , 641, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833880

    Planck Collaboration , Aghanim , N., Akrami , Y., et al. 2020, , 641, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833880

    2020 doi

  132. [225]

    2025, RAIC: Rapid Automatic Image Categorization

    RAIC Labs . 2025, RAIC: Rapid Automatic Image Categorization . https://raiclabs.com

    2025

  133. [226]

    W., Adams , M

    Ramsey , L. W., Adams , M. T., Barnes , T. G., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3352, Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI, ed. L. M. Stepp , 34--42, 10.1117/12.319287

    1998 doi

  134. [227]

    E., Malhotra , S., Dey , A., et al

    Rhoads , J. E., Malhotra , S., Dey , A., et al. 2000, , 545, L85, 10.1086/317874

    2000 doi

  135. [228]

    F., Kennicutt , R

    S \'a nchez , S. F., Kennicutt , R. C., Gil de Paz , A., et al. 2012, , 538, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117353

    2012 doi

  136. [229]

    2020, , 493, 141, 10.1093/mnras/staa093

    Santos , S., Sobral , D., Matthee , J., et al. 2020, , 493, 141, 10.1093/mnras/staa093

    2020 doi

  137. [230]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  138. [231]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  139. [232]

    2007, , 172, 1, 10.1086/516585

    Scoville , N., Aussel , H., Brusa , M., et al. 2007, , 172, 1, 10.1086/516585

    2007 doi

  140. [233]

    E., Steidel , C

    Shapley , A. E., Steidel , C. C., Pettini , M., & Adelberger , K. L. 2003, , 588, 65, 10.1086/373922

    2003 doi

  141. [234]

    2009, , 693, 1404, 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1404

    Shoji , M., Jeong , D., & Komatsu , E. 2009, , 693, 1404, 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1404

    2009 doi

  142. [235]

    2018, , 476, 4725, 10.1093/mnras/sty378

    Sobral , D., Santos , S., Matthee , J., et al. 2018, , 476, 4725, 10.1093/mnras/sty378

    2018 doi

  143. [236]

    2020, , 643, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038756

    Spinoso , D., Orsi , A., L \'o pez-Sanjuan , C., et al. 2020, , 643, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038756

    2020 doi

  144. [237]

    C., Adelberger , K

    Steidel , C. C., Adelberger , K. L., Dickinson , M., et al. 1998, , 492, 428, 10.1086/305073

    1998 doi

  145. [238]

    L., Leung , G., et al

    Tardugno Poleo , V., Finkelstein , S. L., Leung , G., et al. 2023, , 165, 153, 10.3847/1538-3881/acba92

    2023 doi

  146. [239]

    2024, Hierarchical Data Format, version 5

    The HDF Group . 2024, Hierarchical Data Format, version 5 . https://github.com/HDFGroup/hdf5

    2024

  147. [240]

    2019, , 624, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834656

    Urrutia , T., Wisotzki , L., Kerutt , J., et al. 2019, , 624, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834656

    2019 doi

  148. [241]

    J., & Venemans , B

    van Breukelen , C., Jarvis , M. J., & Venemans , B. P. 2005, , 359, 895, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08916.x

    2005 doi

  149. [242]

    Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. 2009, Python 3 Reference Manual (Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace)

    2009

  150. [243]

    P., Wheeler , J

    Vink \'o , J., Thomas , B. P., Wheeler , J. C., et al. 2023, , 946, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbfa8

    2023 doi

  151. [244]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  152. [245]

    H., Davis , D., Gebhardt , K., et al

    Weiss , L. H., Davis , D., Gebhardt , K., et al. 2024, , 962, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1b51

    2024 doi

  153. [246]

    H., Gebhardt , K., Davis , D., et al

    Weiss , L. H., Gebhardt , K., Davis , D., et al. 2025, , 983, 72, 10.3847/1538-4357/adc0f9

    2025 doi

  154. [247]

    C., Greisen , E

    Wells , D. C., Greisen , E. W., & Harten , R. H. 1981, , 44, 363

    1981

  155. [248]

    G., Adelman , J., Anderson , John E., J., et al

    York , D. G., Adelman , J., Anderson , John E., J., et al. 2000, , 120, 1579, 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  156. [249]

    R., Debski , M

    Zeimann , G. R., Debski , M. H., Schneider , D. P., et al. 2024, , 966, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad35b8

    2024 doi

  157. [250]

    Zhang , X., & Green , G. M. 2025, Science, 387, 1209, 10.1126/science.ado9787

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.