Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Thinking Outside the Template with Modular GP-GOMEA

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.01262 v1 pith:KSS6372M submitted 2025-05-02 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords expressionsgp-gomeamodularsubexpressionsinterpretabilitysmalltemplatetree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The goal in Symbolic Regression (SR) is to discover expressions that accurately map input to output data. Because often the intent is to understand these expressions, there is a trade-off between accuracy and the interpretability of expressions. GP-GOMEA excels at producing small SR expressions (increasing the potential for interpretability) with high accuracy, but requires a fixed tree template, which limits the types of expressions that can be evolved. This paper presents a modular representation for GP-GOMEA that allows multiple trees to be evolved simultaneously that can be used as (functional) subexpressions. While each tree individually is constrained to a (small) fixed tree template, the final expression, if expanded, can exhibit a much larger structure. Furthermore, the use of subexpressions decomposes the original regression problem and opens the possibility for enhanced interpretability through the piece-wise understanding of small subexpressions. We compare the performance of GP-GOMEA with and without modular templates on a variety of datasets. We find that our proposed approach generally outperforms single-template GP-GOMEA and can moreover uncover ground-truth expressions underlying synthetic datasets with modular subexpressions at a faster rate than GP-GOMEA without modular subexpressions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Better Multi-Objective GP-GOMEA -- But do we Need it?

    cs.NE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For accuracy vs expression size, single-objective GP-GOMEA with an archive-only multi-objective log outperforms true multi-objective GP-GOMEA, despite new clustering improvements.

Pith tools