REVIEW 1 cited by
Current Observational Constraints to Holographic Dark Energy Model with New Infrared cut-off via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, the holographic dark energy model with new infrared (IR) cut-off for both the flat case and the non-flat case are confronted with the combined constraints of current cosmological observations: type Ia Supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, current Cosmic Microwave Background, and the observational hubble data. By utilizing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, we obtain the best fit values of the parameters with $1\sigma, 2\sigma$ errors in the flat model: $\Omega_{b}h^2=0.0233^{+0.0009 +0.0013}_{-0.0009 -0.0014}$, $\alpha=0.8502^{+0.0984 +0.1299}_{-0.0875 -0.1064}$, $\beta=0.4817^{+0.0842 +0.1176}_{-0.0773 -0.0955}$, $\Omega_{de0}=0.7287^{+0.0296 +0.0432}_{-0.0294 -0.0429}$, $\Omega_{m0}=0.2713^{+0.0294 +0.0429}_{-0.0296 -0.0432}$, $H_0=66.35^{+2.38 +3.35}_{-2.14 -3.07}$. In the non-flat model, the constraint results are found in $1\sigma, 2\sigma$ regions: $\Omega_{b}h^2=0.0228^{+0.0010 +0.0014}_{-0.0010 -0.0014}$, $\Omega_k=0.0305^{+0.0092 +0.0140}_{-0.0134 -0.0176}$, $\alpha=0.8824^{+0.2180 +0.2213}_{-0.1163 -0.1378}$, $\beta=0.5016^{+0.0973 +0.1247}_{-0.0871 -0.1102}$, $\Omega_{de0}=0.6934^{+0.0364 +0.0495}_{-0.0304 -0.0413}$, $\Omega_{m0}=0.2762^{+0.0278 +0.0402}_{-0.0320 -0.0412}$, $H_0=70.20^{+3.03 +3.58}_{-3.17 -4.00}$. In the best fit holographic dark energy models, the equation of state of dark energy and the deceleration parameter at present are characterized by $w_{de0}=-1.1414\pm0.0608, q_0=-0.7476\pm0.0466$ (flat case) and $w_{de0}=-1.0653\pm0.0661, q_0=-0.6231\pm0.0569$ (non-flat case). Compared to the $\Lambda \textmd{CDM}$ model, it is found the current combined datasets do not favor the holographic dark energy model over the $\Lambda \textmd{CDM}$ model.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A comprehensive numerical study on four categories of holographic dark energy models
Seven holographic dark energy models are constrained with DESI BAO, Planck CMB, and PantheonPlus supernovae; LambdaCDM stays preferred, Ricci dark energy is ruled out, and event-horizon models show large data-set-depe...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.