Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 6 cited by

Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Machine learning on gravitational-wave signals from core-collapse supernovae can constrain core rotation out to more than 100 kpc with next-generation detectors for favorable orientations.

desk verdict Next-gen detectors could constrain CCSN core rotation beyond 100 kpc for optimal orientations via ML on bounce signals, but the finite simulation training set leaves room for bias from unmodeled physics. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.04896 v1 pith:KV76M27G submitted 2026-05-06 astro-ph.HE

Almat Akhmetali , Y. Sultan Abylkairov , Daniil Orel , Solange Nunes , Aknur Sakan , Alisher Zhunuskanov , Marat Zaidyn , Nurzhan Ussipov
show 2 more authors
José Antonio Font Ernazar Abdikamalov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords core-collapsesupernovaegravitationalwavesparameterestimationmachinelearningnext-generationdetectorscorerotationbouncesignalinclinationeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tests how accurately machine learning can recover the peak frequency, peak amplitude, and core rotation from the early gravitational-wave emission of rotating core-collapse supernovae. It trains models on signals from multiple progenitor stars and nuclear equations of state, then evaluates performance under realistic detector noise for both existing and future observatories while varying bounce-time uncertainty and source inclination. Bounce-time errors turn out to have little effect in the Fourier domain, but orientations with the rotation axis nearly along the line of sight sharply reduce accuracy. The main result is that next-generation detectors could measure rotation for optimally oriented events beyond 100 kpc.

What carries the argument

Machine learning regression applied to Fourier-domain gravitational-wave signals to infer peak frequency, peak amplitude, and progenitor core rotation.

What would settle it

Detection of a core-collapse supernova gravitational-wave signal with independently known orientation and rotation, followed by comparison of the machine-learning rotation estimate against that independent value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Parameter estimation of peak frequency, peak amplitude, and core rotation from the bounce and early ring-down gravitational-wave signal of rotating core-collapse supernovae is robust to bounce-time uncertainty in the Fourier domain but degrades for near face-on inclinations; for optimal orientations, next-generation detector sensitivities extend the distance horizon for rotation constraints beyond 100 kpc.

Load-bearing premise

Machine learning models trained on a finite collection of simulated signals from chosen progenitors and equations of state will produce unbiased estimates when applied to real gravitational-wave data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bounce-time uncertainty has negligible impact on parameter recovery when the analysis uses the Fourier domain.
  • Inclinations that place the rotation axis near the line of sight cause substantial loss of accuracy in all recovered parameters.
  • Next-generation detectors extend the rotation-constraint horizon beyond 100 kpc for optimally oriented sources.
  • The method remains applicable across a range of progenitor masses and nuclear equations of state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combined gravitational-wave and neutrino observations of the same event could cross-check the rotation values extracted by the machine-learning pipeline.
  • Applying the trained models to archival data from current detectors could set preliminary upper limits on core rotation for nearby supernovae even without a positive detection.
  • Extending the training set to include more varied explosion dynamics would test whether the current distance horizon holds for a broader class of signals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a machine-learning framework to infer the peak frequency, peak amplitude, and core rotation rate from the bounce and early ring-down gravitational-wave signals of rotating core-collapse supernovae. It employs a suite of 2D/3D numerical simulations spanning multiple progenitors and equations of state, tests robustness to bounce-time uncertainty in the Fourier domain, examines orientation dependence, and folds in noise curves for both current and next-generation detectors. The principal results are that Fourier-domain analysis is insensitive to bounce-time jitter, near face-on orientations substantially degrade performance, and next-generation detectors can constrain rotation beyond 100 kpc for optimal orientations.

Significance. If the reported ML performance generalizes, the work would meaningfully extend the science reach of gravitational-wave observations of core-collapse supernovae by showing that rotation can be constrained at extragalactic distances with future detectors, thereby offering a new observable for the supernova central engine.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and results on the 100 kpc horizon: the headline claim that next-generation detectors constrain rotation beyond 100 kpc for optimal orientations is obtained by feeding simulated peak-frequency and peak-amplitude values into ML regressors trained on a finite progenitor/EOS suite. No quantitative assessment is provided of systematic offsets that would arise if real signals include unmodeled 3D convective overturn, magnetic amplification, or neutrino-transport shifts in bounce frequency (tens of Hz), which directly affect the two summary statistics used by the regressors at low SNR.
  2. The Fourier-domain robustness test addresses only bounce-time jitter; it does not test robustness to morphology mismatch between the training ensemble and nature (e.g., full 3D turbulence altering the ring-down spectrum). Because the ML mapping is learned from the training distribution, any such mismatch would propagate directly into biased rotation posteriors at the distances claimed.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact architecture, hyper-parameter choices, and cross-validation procedure used for the ML regressors; these details are essential for reproducibility and for judging generalization.
  2. The orientation-dependence results would benefit from an explicit table or figure showing the degradation in rotation uncertainty as a function of inclination angle for each detector class.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comments point by point below, agreeing that additional discussion of limitations is needed. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate these points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results on the 100 kpc horizon: the headline claim that next-generation detectors constrain rotation beyond 100 kpc for optimal orientations is obtained by feeding simulated peak-frequency and peak-amplitude values into ML regressors trained on a finite progenitor/EOS suite. No quantitative assessment is provided of systematic offsets that would arise if real signals include unmodeled 3D convective overturn, magnetic amplification, or neutrino-transport shifts in bounce frequency (tens of Hz), which directly affect the two summary statistics used by the regressors at low SNR.

    Authors: We agree that our training ensemble is finite and does not capture all possible physical effects. While the suite spans multiple progenitors and equations of state, we have not performed a quantitative assessment of systematic shifts from full 3D convection, magnetic amplification, or neutrino-transport details. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated limitations section that discusses these potential biases, their likely impact on the summary statistics at low SNR, and the resulting uncertainty in the reported horizons. We will also moderate the abstract language to reflect these caveats. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The Fourier-domain robustness test addresses only bounce-time jitter; it does not test robustness to morphology mismatch between the training ensemble and nature (e.g., full 3D turbulence altering the ring-down spectrum). Because the ML mapping is learned from the training distribution, any such mismatch would propagate directly into biased rotation posteriors at the distances claimed.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the existing test is limited to bounce-time jitter and does not address broader morphological differences that could arise from three-dimensional turbulence or other unmodeled physics. Because the regressors are trained on the specific distribution of our simulations, such mismatches could introduce biases. We will revise the manuscript to include an explicit statement of this limitation in the discussion, clarifying that the quoted performance assumes signals drawn from the training distribution. Expanded simulation libraries will be required for a more complete robustness test. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ML inference trained on external simulations and evaluated on held-out cases

full rationale

The derivation chain trains ML regressors on a finite suite of numerical CCSN simulations (varying progenitors, EOS, rotation) to map Fourier-domain peak frequency and amplitude to core rotation rate. Performance metrics and distance horizons (>100 kpc for optimal orientations with next-gen detectors) are obtained by applying the trained models to separate test waveforms injected at varying distances and orientations. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter from the same data; bounce-time robustness is tested via explicit Fourier-domain shifts rather than assumed. External simulation inputs and cross-validation prevent self-definitional or fitted-input-called-prediction circularity. Minor self-citations to prior simulation suites are not load-bearing for the central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about CCSN waveform morphology in the Fourier domain and the representativeness of the chosen simulation suite; no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Gravitational-wave signals from rotating CCSNe exhibit identifiable peak frequency and amplitude features in the Fourier domain that correlate with core rotation.
    Invoked to justify the choice of ML targets and the claim that Fourier analysis mitigates bounce-time uncertainty.
  • domain assumption Numerical simulations with the selected progenitors and nuclear equations of state adequately sample the relevant signal variations.
    Required for the ML model to generalize to real events.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KV76M27G

@misc{pith2026260504896,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KV76M27G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.04896}
}
read the original abstract

Core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are powerful sources of gravitational waves (GWs). These signals propagate essentially unobstructed, providing a unique probe of the supernova central engine. In this work, we investigate parameter estimation from the bounce and early ring-down GW signal of rotating CCSNe using machine learning. We infer the peak frequency and peak amplitude of the signal as well as the rotation of the core. We extend previous studies in several directions. We consider a range of progenitor models and nuclear equations of state, and we assess the impact of key physical uncertainties, including bounce-time uncertainty and source inclination. We incorporate both current detector noise and the projected sensitivities of next-generation observatories. We find that uncertainty in the bounce time does not significantly affect parameter estimation when the analysis is performed in the Fourier domain. In contrast, orientations when the rotation axis is near the line of sight substantially degrade performance. For optimal orientations, next-generation detectors can constrain rotation out to distances exceeding 100 kpc.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04896 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. True vs. predicted values of the estimated parameters using the FD representation with ∆ view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. P-P plot for the estimated parameters at 10 kpc us view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Fraction of signals with Absolute Percentage Error (APE) view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder for core-collapse supernova gravitational-wave detection

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder detects core-collapse supernova gravitational waves with performance comparable to supervised CNNs, better generalization to unseen waveforms, and ~120 kpc sensi...

  2. The Generalization Gap in Machine Learning EoS Inference from Core-Collapse Supernova Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    LightGBM and other regressors achieve R^{2}≈0.6–0.7 under random CV on CCSN GW catalogues but collapse to worse-than-mean performance under Leave-One-EoS-Out validation, exposing a generalisation gap for unseen EoS families.

  3. Long-lived intermittent accretion disks in the jittering jets explosion mechanism (JJEM) of core-collapse supernovae

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Viscous angular-momentum transport and jet feedback can keep intermittent accretion disks around newborn neutron stars alive long enough to launch the energetic jet pairs seen in some supernova remnants.

  4. JWST observations support the jittering-jets explosion mechanism (JJEM) for the core-collapse supernova remnant SNR 0540-69.3

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    JWST data on SNR 0540-69.3 reveals point-symmetric ejecta morphology consistent with shaping by at least three jet pairs, supporting the jittering-jets explosion mechanism.

  5. JWST observations of a planetary nebula support jet-driven explosion of core-collapse supernova remnant RCW 103

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Morphological similarity between JWST images of planetary nebula PMR 1 and X-ray images of CCSN remnant RCW 103 indicates that two pairs of jets shaped RCW 103, supporting the jittering-jets explosion mechanism.

  6. The jet-shaped pipe morphology in planetary nebulae and core-collapse supernova remnants

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Morphological similarity between pipe structures in planetary nebulae and supernova remnants, plus a jet simulation, indicates that jittering jets shaped both.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 130 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Col- laboration, the KAGRA Collaboration, A. G. Abac, 10 I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese, and K. e. a. Ackley, GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18082 (2025), arXiv:2508.1808...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Mezzacappa and M

    A. Mezzacappa and M. Zanolin, Gravitational Waves from Neutrino-Driven Core Collapse Supernovae: Pre- dictions, Detection, and Parameter Estimation, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.11635 (2024), arXiv:2401.11635 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Vartanyan, A

    D. Vartanyan, A. Burrows, T. Wang, M. S. B. Coleman, and C. J. White, Gravitational-wave signature of core- collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103015 (2023), arXiv:2302.07092 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    B. M¨ uller, Core-Collapse Supernovae and their Grav- itational Wave Signals: The Status of Theory and Modeling, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.24243 (2026), arXiv:2603.24243 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, and F. Acernese (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration and ASAS-SN Collaboration and DLT40 Collaboration), Optically targeted search for gravitational waves emitted by core-collapse supernovae during the first and second observing runs of advanced ligo and advanced virgo, Phys. Rev. D 101,...

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    M. J. Szczepa´ nczyk, Y. Zheng, J. M. Antelis, M. Ben- jamin, M.-A. Bizouard, A. Casallas-Lagos, P. Cerd´ a- Dur´ an, D. Davis, D. Gondek-Rosi´ nska, S. Klimenko, C. Moreno, M. Obergaulinger, J. Powell, D. Ramirez, B. Ratto, C. Richardson, A. Rijal, A. L. Stuver, P. Szewczyk, G. Vedovato, M. Zanolin, I. Bartos, S. Bhaumik, T. Bulik, M. Drago, J. A. Font, ...

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Detection Prospects of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Supernova-Optimized Third-Generation Gravitational-wave Detectors

    V. Srivastava, S. Ballmer, D. A. Brown, C. Afle, A. Bur- rows, D. Radice, and D. Vartanyan, Detection prospects of core-collapse supernovae with supernova-optimized third-generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 100, 043026 (2019), arXiv:1906.00084 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: a Sneak Preview

    H.-T. Janka, T. Melson, and A. Summa, Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: A Sneak Preview, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 341 (2016), arXiv:1602.05576 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 130 references
  1. [9]

    Ertl, H.-T

    T. Ertl, H.-T. Janka, S. E. Woosley, T. Sukhbold, and M. Ugliano, A Two-parameter Criterion for Classify- ing the Explodability of Massive Stars by the Neutrino- driven Mechanism, Astrophys. J. 818, 124 (2016), arXiv:1503.07522 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016

  2. [10]

    Boccioli, D

    L. Boccioli, D. Vartanyan, E. P. O’Connor, and D. Kasen, Neutrino heating in 1D, 2D, and 3D core- collapse supernovae: characterizing the explosion of high-compactness stars, MNRAS 540, 3885 (2025), arXiv:2501.06784 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  3. [11]

    Janka, Conditions for shock revival by neutrino heating in core-collapse supernovae, A&A 368, 527 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0008432 [astro-ph]

    H.-T. Janka, Conditions for shock revival by neutrino heating in core-collapse supernovae, A&A 368, 527 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0008432 [astro-ph]

    2001

  4. [12]

    Burrows, L

    A. Burrows, L. Dessart, E. Livne, C. D. Ott, and J. Murphy, Simulations of Magnetically Driven Super- nova and Hypernova Explosions in the Context of Rapid Rotation, Astrophys. J. 664, 416 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0702539

    2007

  5. [13]

    Burrows, Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 245 (2013), arXiv:1210.4921 [astro-ph.SR]

    A. Burrows, Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 245 (2013), arXiv:1210.4921 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013

  6. [14]

    O’Connor and C

    E. O’Connor and C. D. Ott, Black Hole Formation in Failing Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 730, 70 (2011), arXiv:1010.5550 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011

  7. [15]

    Nakamura, S

    K. Nakamura, S. Horiuchi, M. Tanaka, K. Hayama, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake, Multimessenger signals of long-term core-collapse supernova simulations: syn- ergetic observation strategies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 461, 3296 (2016), arXiv:1602.03028 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016

  8. [16]

    J. R. Westernacher-Schneider, E. O’Connor, E. O’Sullivan, I. Tamborra, M.-R. Wu, S. M. Couch, and F. Malmenbeck, Multimessenger asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123009 (2019), arXiv:1907.01138 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  9. [17]

    M¨ uller, H.-T

    B. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Marek, A New Multi- dimensional General Relativistic Neutrino Hydrody- namics Code of Core-collapse Supernovae. III. Gravita- tional Wave Signals from Supernova Explosion Models, Astrophys. J. 766, 43 (2013), arXiv:1210.6984 [astro- ph.SR]

    2013

  10. [18]

    Morozova, D

    V. Morozova, D. Radice, A. Burrows, and D. Var- tanyan, The Gravitational Wave Signal from Core- collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 861, 10 (2018), arXiv:1801.01914 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018

  11. [19]

    Torres-Forn´ e, P

    A. Torres-Forn´ e, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, M. Obergaulinger, B. M¨ uller, and J. A. Font, Universal Relations for Gravitational-Wave Asteroseismology of Protoneu- tron Stars, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 051102 (2019), arXiv:1902.10048 [gr-qc]

    2019

  12. [20]

    Powell and B

    J. Powell and B. M¨ uller, Inferring astrophysical parame- ters of core-collapse supernovae from their gravitational- wave emission, Phys. Rev. D 105, 063018 (2022), arXiv:2201.01397 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  13. [21]

    Burrows and J

    A. Burrows and J. Goshy, A Theory of Supernova Ex- plosions, ApJ Lett. 416, L75 (1993)

    1993

  14. [22]

    M¨ uller, H.-T

    B. M¨ uller, H.-T. Janka, and A. Heger, New Two- dimensional Models of Supernova Explosions by the Neutrino-heating Mechanism: Evidence for Different Instability Regimes in Collapsing Stellar Cores, Astro- phys. J. 761, 72 (2012), arXiv:1205.7078 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012

  15. [23]

    Radice, C

    D. Radice, C. D. Ott, E. Abdikamalov, S. M. Couch, R. Haas, and E. Schnetter, Neutrino-driven Convection in Core-collapse Supernovae: High-resolution Simula- tions, Astrophys. J. 820, 76 (2016), arXiv:1510.05022 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016

  16. [24]

    J. W. Murphy, C. D. Ott, and A. Burrows, A Model for Gravitational Wave Emission from Neutrino-Driven Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 707, 1173 (2009), arXiv:0907.4762 [astro-ph.SR]

    2009

  17. [25]

    C. D. Ott, E. Abdikamalov, P. M¨ osta, R. Haas, S. Drasco, E. P. O’Connor, C. Reisswig, C. A. Meakin, and E. Schnetter, General-relativistic Simula- tions of Three-dimensional Core-collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 768, 115 (2013), arXiv:1210.6674 [astro- ph.HE]

    2013

  18. [26]

    K. N. Yakunin, A. Mezzacappa, P. Marronetti, S. Yoshida, S. W. Bruenn, W. R. Hix, E. J. Lentz, O. E. Bronson Messer, J. A. Harris, E. Endeve, J. M. Blondin, 11 and E. J. Lingerfelt, Gravitational wave signatures of ab initio two-dimensional core collapse supernova explosion mo...

    2015

  19. [27]

    Andresen, B

    H. Andresen, B. M¨ uller, E. M¨ uller, and H. T. Janka, Gravitational wave signals from 3D neutrino hydrody- namics simulations of core-collapse supernovae, MN- RAS 468, 2032 (2017), arXiv:1607.05199 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [28]

    Mezzacappa, P

    A. Mezzacappa, P. Marronetti, R. E. Landfield, E. J. Lentz, R. D. Murphy, W. Raphael Hix, J. A. Harris, S. W. Bruenn, J. M. Blondin, O. E. Bronson Messer, J. Casanova, and L. L. Kronzer, Core collapse super- nova gravitational wave emission for progenitors of 9.6, 15, and 25M ...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Sotani, B

    H. Sotani, B. M¨ uller, and T. Takiwaki, Universal- ity in supernova gravitational waves with protoneu- tron star properties, Phys. Rev. D 109, 123021 (2024), arXiv:2405.09030 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  22. [30]

    Ehring, S

    J. Ehring, S. Abbar, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt, K. Naka- mura, and K. Kotake, Gravitational-Wave Signatures of Nonstandard Neutrino Properties in Collapsing Stellar Cores, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 021201 (2026), arXiv:2412.02750 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026

  23. [31]

    Lella, G

    A. Lella, G. Lucente, D. Kresse, R. Glas, H.-T. Janka, and A. Mirizzi, Gravitational-Wave Signals for Supernova Explosions of Three-Dimensional Pro- genitors, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.02651 (2026), arXiv:2602.02651 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026

  24. [32]

    S. M. Couch and C. D. Ott, Revival of the Stalled Core- collapse Supernova Shock Triggered by Precollapse As- phericity in the Progenitor Star, ApJ Lett. 778, L7 (2013), arXiv:1309.2632 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013

  25. [33]

    S. M. Couch, E. Chatzopoulos, W. D. Arnett, and F. X. Timmes, The Three-dimensional Evolution to Core Col- lapse of a Massive Star, ApJ Lett. 808, L21 (2015), arXiv:1503.02199 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015

  26. [34]

    M¨ uller, T

    B. M¨ uller, T. Melson, A. Heger, and H.-T. Janka, Su- pernova simulations from a 3D progenitor model - Im- pact of perturbations and evolution of explosion proper- ties, MNRAS 472, 491 (2017), arXiv:1705.00620 [astro- ph.SR]

    2017

  27. [35]

    Nagakura, K

    H. Nagakura, K. Takahashi, and Y. Yamamoto, On the importance of progenitor asymmetry to shock revival in core-collapse supernovae, MNRAS 483, 208 (2019), arXiv:1811.05515 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  28. [36]

    Kazeroni and E

    R. Kazeroni and E. Abdikamalov, The impact of pro- genitor asymmetries on the neutrino-driven convection in core-collapse supernovae, MNRAS 494, 5360 (2020), arXiv:1911.08819 [astro-ph.SR]

    2020

  29. [37]

    Vartanyan, M

    D. Vartanyan, M. S. B. Coleman, and A. Burrows, The collapse and three-dimensional explosion of three- dimensional massive-star supernova progenitor models, MNRAS 510, 4689 (2022), arXiv:2109.10920 [astro- ph.SR]

    2022

  30. [38]

    Telman, E

    Y. Telman, E. Abdikamalov, and T. Foglizzo, Convec- tive vortices in collapsing stars, MNRAS 535, 1388 (2024), arXiv:2409.17737 [astro-ph.SR]

    2024

  31. [39]

    J. M. Blondin, A. Mezzacappa, and C. DeMarino, Sta- bility of Standing Accretion Shocks, with an Eye to- ward Core-Collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 584, 971 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210634 [astro-ph]

    2003

  32. [40]

    Foglizzo, L

    T. Foglizzo, L. Scheck, and H. T. Janka, Neutrino-driven Convection versus Advection in Core-Collapse Super- novae, Astrophys. J. 652, 1436 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0507636 [astro-ph]

    2006

  33. [41]

    Kuroda, K

    T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, and T. Takiwaki, A New Gravitational-wave Signature from Standing Accretion Shock Instability in Supernovae, ApJ Lett. 829, L14 (2016), arXiv:1605.09215 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016

  34. [42]

    Kuroda, K

    T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, K. Hayama, and T. Taki- waki, Correlated Signatures of Gravitational-wave and Neutrino Emission in Three-dimensional General- relativistic Core-collapse Supernova Simulations, As- trophys. J. 851, 62 (2017), arXiv:1708.05252 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017

  35. [43]

    A. C. Buellet, T. Foglizzo, J. Guilet, and E. Abdika- malov, Effect of stellar rotation on the development of post-shock instabilities during core-collapse super- novae, A&A 674, A205 (2023), arXiv:2301.01962 [astro- ph.HE]

    2023

  36. [44]

    M¨ uller and H.-T

    B. M¨ uller and H.-T. Janka, Non-radial instabilities and progenitor asphericities in core-collapse supernovae, MNRAS 448, 2141 (2015), arXiv:1409.4783 [astro- ph.SR]

    2015

  37. [45]

    S. W. Bruenn, E. J. Lentz, W. R. Hix, A. Mezzacappa, J. A. Harris, O. E. B. Messer, E. Endeve, J. M. Blondin, M. A. Chertkow, E. J. Lingerfelt, P. Marronetti, and K. N. Yakunin, The Development of Explosions in Ax- isymmetric Ab Initio Core-collapse Supernova Simula- tions of ...

    2016

  38. [46]

    Heger, S

    A. Heger, S. E. Woosley, and H. C. Spruit, Presupernova Evolution of Differentially Rotating Massive Stars In- cluding Magnetic Fields, Astrophys. J. 626, 350 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409422 [astro-ph]

    2005

  39. [47]

    C. D. Ott, E. Abdikamalov, E. O’Connor, C. Reiss- wig, R. Haas, P. Kalmus, S. Drasco, A. Burrows, and E. Schnetter, Correlated gravitational wave and neu- trino signals from general-relativistic rapidly rotating iron core collapse, Phys. Rev. D 86, 024026 (2012), arXiv:1204.05...

    2012

  40. [48]

    Fuller, H

    J. Fuller, H. Klion, E. Abdikamalov, and C. D. Ott, Supernova seismology: gravitational wave signatures of rapidly rotating core collapse, MNRAS 450, 414 (2015), arXiv:1501.06951 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015

  41. [49]

    Scheidegger, T

    S. Scheidegger, T. Fischer, S. C. Whitehouse, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, Gravitational waves from 3D MHD core collapse simulations, A&A 490, 231 (2008), arXiv:0709.0168 [astro-ph]

    2008

  42. [50]

    Shibagaki, T

    S. Shibagaki, T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, and T. Takiwaki, A new gravitational-wave signature of low-T/—W— in- stability in rapidly rotating stellar core collapse, MN- RAS 493, L138 (2020), arXiv:1909.09730 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  43. [51]

    K.-C. Pan, M. Liebend¨ orfer, S. M. Couch, and F.-K. Thielemann, Stellar Mass Black Hole Formation and Multimessenger Signals from Three-dimensional Rotat- ing Core-collapse Supernova Simulations, Astrophys. J. 914, 140 (2021), arXiv:2010.02453 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  44. [52]

    Mueller and H

    E. Mueller and H. T. Janka, Gravitational radiation from convective instabilities in Type II supernova ex- plosions., A&A 317, 140 (1997)

    1997

  45. [53]

    Takiwaki and K

    T. Takiwaki and K. Kotake, Anisotropic emission of neutrino and gravitational-wave signals from rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae, MNRAS 475, L91 (2018), arXiv:1711.01905 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018

  46. [54]

    Vartanyan and A

    D. Vartanyan and A. Burrows, Gravitational Waves from Neutrino Emission Asymmetries in Core- 12 collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 901, 108 (2020), arXiv:2007.07261 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  47. [55]

    L. Choi, A. Burrows, and D. Vartanyan, Gravitational- wave and Gravitational-wave Memory Signatures of Core-collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 975, 12 (2024), arXiv:2408.01525 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  48. [56]

    Radice, V

    D. Radice, V. Morozova, A. Burrows, D. Vartanyan, and H. Nagakura, Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Signal from Core-collapse Supernovae, ApJL 876, L9 (2019), arXiv:1812.07703 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  49. [57]

    Birnholtz and T

    O. Birnholtz and T. Piran, Gravitational wave memory from gamma ray bursts’ jets, Phys. Rev. D 87, 123007 (2013), arXiv:1302.5713 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013

  50. [58]

    M. Pais, T. Piran, and E. Nakar, The velocity distri- bution of outflows driven by choked jets in stellar en- velopes, MNRAS 519, 1941 (2023), arXiv:2208.14459 [astro-ph.HE]

    1941

  51. [59]

    M¨ osta, S

    P. M¨ osta, S. Richers, C. D. Ott, R. Haas, A. L. Piro, K. Boydstun, E. Abdikamalov, C. Reisswig, and E. Schnetter, Magnetorotational Core-collapse Super- novae in Three Dimensions, ApJL 785, L29 (2014), arXiv:1403.1230 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014

  52. [60]

    Obergaulinger and M

    M. Obergaulinger and M. ´A. Aloy, Magnetorota- tional core collapse of possible GRB progenitors - I. Explosion mechanisms, MNRAS 492, 4613 (2020), arXiv:1909.01105 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  53. [61]

    Kuroda, A

    T. Kuroda, A. Arcones, T. Takiwaki, and K. Kotake, Magnetorotational Explosion of a Massive Star Sup- ported by Neutrino Heating in General Relativistic Three-dimensional Simulations, Astrophys. J. 896, 102 (2020), arXiv:2003.02004 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  54. [62]

    Cusinato, M

    M. Cusinato, M. Obergaulinger, M. ´A. Aloy, and J. A. Font, Resonant amplification of multimessenger emis- sion in rotating stellar core collapse, Physical Review Research 8, 013180 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    M. A. Pajkos, M. L. Warren, S. M. Couch, E. P. O’Connor, and K.-C. Pan, Determining the Structure of Rotating Massive Stellar Cores with Gravitational Waves, Astrophys. J. 914, 80 (2021), arXiv:2011.09000 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  56. [64]

    Abdikamalov, G

    E. Abdikamalov, G. Pagliaroli, and D. Radice, Grav- itational Waves from Core-Collapse Supernovae, in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy , edited by C. Bambi, S. Katsanevas, and K. D. Kokkotas (2022) p. 21

    2022

  57. [65]

    Casallas-Lagos, J

    A. Casallas-Lagos, J. M. Antelis, C. Moreno, M. Zano- lin, A. Mezzacappa, and M. J. Szczepa´ nczyk, Charac- terizing the temporal evolution of the high-frequency gravitational wave emission for a core collapse super- nova with laser interferometric data: A neural network appro...

    2023

  58. [66]

    Mitra, B

    A. Mitra, B. Shukirgaliyev, Y. S. Abylkairov, and E. Ab- dikamalov, Exploring supernova gravitational waves with machine learning, MNRAS 520, 2473 (2023), arXiv:2209.14542 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  59. [67]

    Logue, C

    J. Logue, C. D. Ott, I. S. Heng, P. Kalmus, and J. H. C. Scargill, Inferring core-collapse supernova physics with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 86, 044023 (2012), arXiv:1202.3256 [gr-qc]

    2012

  60. [68]

    Powell, A

    J. Powell, A. Iess, M. Llorens-Monteagudo, M. Ober- gaulinger, B. M¨ uller, A. Torres-Forn´ e, E. Cuoco, and J. A. Font, Determining the core-collapse super- nova explosion mechanism with current and future gravitational-wave observatories, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063019 (2024), arX...

    2024

  61. [69]

    Abdikamalov, S

    E. Abdikamalov, S. Gossan, A. M. DeMaio, and C. D. Ott, Measuring the angular momentum distribution in core-collapse supernova progenitors with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D90, 044001 (2014), arXiv:1311.3678 [astro-ph.SR]

    2014

  62. [70]

    M. A. Pajkos, S. M. Couch, K.-C. Pan, and E. P. O’Connor, Features of Accretion-phase Gravitational- wave Emission from Two-dimensional Rotating Core- collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 878, 13 (2019), arXiv:1901.09055 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  63. [71]

    Bizouard, P

    M.-A. Bizouard, P. Maturana-Russel, A. Torres-Forn´ e, M. Obergaulinger, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, N. Christensen, J. A. Font, and R. Meyer, Inference of protoneutron star properties from gravitational-wave data in core- collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063006 (2021), arXiv:20...

    2021

  64. [72]

    Bruel, M.-A

    T. Bruel, M.-A. Bizouard, M. Obergaulinger, P. Maturana-Russel, A. Torres-Forn´ e, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, N. Christensen, J. A. Font, and R. Meyer, Inference of protoneutron star properties in core-collapse su- pernovae from a gravitational-wave detector network, Phys. Rev. D 107...

    2023

  65. [73]

    Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, N

    P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, N. DeBrye, M. A. Aloy, J. A. Font, and M. Obergaulinger, Gravitational Wave Signatures in Black Hole Forming Core Collapse, ApJL 779, L18 (2013), arXiv:1310.8290 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013

  66. [74]

    K.-C. Pan, M. Liebend¨ orfer, S. M. Couch, and F.- K. Thielemann, Equation of State Dependent Dy- namics and Multi-messenger Signals from Stellar-mass Black Hole Formation, Astrophys. J. 857, 13 (2018), arXiv:1710.01690 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018

  67. [75]

    Shibagaki, T

    S. Shibagaki, T. Kuroda, K. Kotake, and T. Taki- waki, Characteristic time variability of gravitational- wave and neutrino signals from three-dimensional simu- lations of non-rotating and rapidly rotating stellar core collapse, MNRAS 502, 3066 (2021), arXiv:2010.03882 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021

  68. [76]

    Burrows, D

    A. Burrows, D. Vartanyan, and T. Wang, Black Hole Formation Accompanied by the Supernova Explosion of a 40 M ⊙ Progenitor Star, Astrophys. J. 957, 68 (2023), arXiv:2308.05798 [astro-ph.SR]

    2023

  69. [77]

    Powell and B

    J. Powell and B. M¨ uller, Gravitational waves from core-collapse supernovae with no electromagnetic coun- terparts, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.03581 (2025), arXiv:2506.03581 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  70. [78]

    Eggenberger Andersen, E

    O. Eggenberger Andersen, E. O’Connor, H. Andresen, A. da Silva Schneider, and S. M. Couch, Black Hole Supernovae, Their Equation of State Dependence, and Ejecta Composition, Astrophys. J. 980, 53 (2025), arXiv:2411.11969 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  71. [79]

    C. D. Ott, C. Reisswig, E. Schnetter, E. O’Connor, U. Sperhake, F. L¨ offler, P. Diener, E. Abdikamalov, I. Hawke, and A. Burrows, Dynamics and Gravita- tional Wave Signature of Collapsar Formation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 161103 (2011), arXiv:1012.1853 [astro- ph.HE]

    2011

  72. [80]

    Kuroda and M

    T. Kuroda and M. Shibata, Failed supernova simula- tions beyond black hole formation, MNRAS 526, 152 (2023), arXiv:2307.06192 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  73. [81]

    Richers, C

    S. Richers, C. D. Ott, E. Abdikamalov, E. O’Connor, and C. Sullivan, Equation of state effects on gravita- 13 tional waves from rotating core collapse, Phys. Rev. D 95, 063019 (2017), arXiv:1701.02752 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017

  74. [82]

    M. C. Edwards, Classifying the equation of state from rotating core collapse gravitational waves with deep learning, Phys. Rev. D 103, 024025 (2021), arXiv:2009.07367 [astro-ph.IM]

    2021

  75. [83]

    Chao, C.-Z

    Y.-S. Chao, C.-Z. Su, T.-Y. Chen, D.-W. Wang, and K.-C. Pan, Determining the Core Structure and Nuclear Equation of State of Rotating Core-collapse Supernovae with Gravitational Waves by Convolutional Neural Net- works, Astrophys. J. 939, 13 (2022), arXiv:2209.10089 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  76. [84]

    N. E. Wolfe, C. Fr¨ ohlich, J. M. Miller, A. Torres- Forn´ e, and P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Gravitational Wave Eigen- frequencies from Neutrino-driven Core-collapse Super- novae, Astrophys. J. 954, 161 (2023), arXiv:2303.16962 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  77. [85]

    Mitra, D

    A. Mitra, D. Orel, Y. S. Abylkairov, B. Shukirgaliyev, and E. Abdikamalov, Probing nuclear physics with su- pernova gravitational waves and machine learning, MN- RAS 529, 3582 (2024), arXiv:2310.15649 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  78. [86]

    Sultan Abylkairov, M

    Y. Sultan Abylkairov, M. C. Edwards, A. Ostrikov, Y. Tleukhanov, A. Torres-Forn´ e, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, J. A. Font, M. J. Szczepa´ nczyk, and E. Abdikamalov, As- sessing the distance for probing the nuclear equation of state with supernova gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D , (2025)

    2025

  79. [87]

    Akhmetali, Y

    A. Akhmetali, Y. Sultan Abylkairov, M. Zaidyn, A. Sakan, A. Zhunuskanov, N. Ussipov, J. A. Font, A. Torres-Forn´ e, and E. Abdikamalov, Toward More Realistic Machine-Learning Inference of the Dense- Matter Equation of State from Supernova Gravita- tional Waves, arXiv e-prints ...

    2026

  80. [88]

    R. D. Murphy, A. Casallas-Lagos, A. Mezzacappa, M. Zanolin, R. E. Landfield, E. J. Lentz, P. Marronetti, J. M. Antelis, and C. Moreno, Dependence of the re- constructed core-collapse supernova gravitational wave high-frequency feature on the nuclear equation of state in real i...

    2024

  81. [89]

    Rusakov, A

    A. Rusakov, A. S. Burrows, T. Wang, and D. Vartanyan, An Exploration of the Equation of State Dependence of Core-Collapse Supernova Explosion Outcomes and Signatures, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2602.09025 (2026), arXiv:2602.09025 [astro-ph.HE]

    2026 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Powell and B

    J. Powell and B. M¨ uller, Impact of the nuclear equa- tion of state on the explodability of massive stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.20076 (2025), arXiv:2510.20076 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  83. [91]

    C. D. Ott, H. Dimmelmeier, A. Marek, H. T. Janka, B. Zink, I. Hawke, and E. Schnetter, Rotating col- lapse of stellar iron cores in general relativity, Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity 24, S139 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0612638 [astro-ph]

    2007

  84. [92]

    Y. S. Abylkairov, M. C. Edwards, D. Orel, A. Mitra, B. Shukirgaliyev, and E. Abdikamalov, Evaluating ma- chine learning models for supernova gravitational wave signal classification, Machine Learning: Science and Technology 5, 045077 (2024), arXiv:2409.14508 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024

  85. [93]

    M. C. Edwards, R. Meyer, and N. Christensen, Bayesian parameter estimation of core collapse supernovae using gravitational wave simulations, Inverse Problems 30, 114008 (2014), arXiv:1407.7549 [physics.data-an]

    2014

  86. [94]

    Pastor-Marcos, P

    C. Pastor-Marcos, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, D. Walker, A. Torres-Forn´ e, E. Abdikamalov, S. Richers, and J. A. Font, Bayesian inference from gravitational waves in fast-rotating, core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063028 (2024), arXiv:2308.03456 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  87. [95]

    Nunes, G

    S. Nunes, G. Escrig, O. G. Freitas, J. A. Font, T. Fer- nandes, A. Onofre, and A. Torres-Forn´ e, Deep-learning classification and parameter inference of rotational core- collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 110, 064037 (2024), arXiv:2403.04938 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  88. [96]

    L. O. Villegas, C. Moreno, M. A. Pajkos, M. Zanolin, and J. M. Antelis, Parameter estimation from the core- bounce phase of rotating core collapse supernovae in real interferometer noise, Classical and Quantum Grav- ity 42, 115001 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    Pagliaroli, F

    G. Pagliaroli, F. Vissani, E. Coccia, and W. Fulgione, Neutrinos from Supernovae as a Trigger for Gravi- tational Wave Search, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 031102 (2009), arXiv:0903.1191 [hep-ph]

    2009

  90. [98]

    Halzen and G

    F. Halzen and G. G. Raffelt, Reconstructing the super- nova bounce time with neutrinos in IceCube, Phys. Rev. D 80, 087301 (2009), arXiv:0908.2317 [astro-ph.HE]

    2009

  91. [99]

    S. Hild, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Amaro-Seoane, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Bar- suglia, M. Beker, N. Beveridge, S. Birindelli, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, T. Bulik, E. Cal- loni, G. Cella, E. Chassande Mottin, S. Chelkowski, A. Chincar...

    2011

  92. [100]

    Abac and et al, The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, J

    A. Abac and et al, The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2026, 081 (2026), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    2026 arXiv

  93. [101]

    E. D. Hall, Cosmic Explorer: A Next-Generation Ground-Based Gravitational-Wave Observatory, Galax- 14 ies 10, 10.3390/galaxies10040090 (2022)

    2022 doi

  94. [102]

    Dimmelmeier, J

    H. Dimmelmeier, J. A. Font, and E. M¨ uller, Relativis- tic simulations of rotational core collapse I. Methods, initial models, and code tests, A&A 388, 917 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0204288 [astro-ph]

    2002

  95. [103]

    Dimmelmeier, J

    H. Dimmelmeier, J. Novak, J. A. Font, J. M. Ib´ a˜ nez, and E. M¨ uller, Combining spectral and shock-capturing methods: A new numerical approach for 3D relativis- tic core collapse simulations, Phys. Rev. D 71, 064023 (2005), astro-ph/0407174

    2005

  96. [104]

    Liebend¨ orfer, A Simple Parameterization of the Con- sequences of Deleptonization for Simulations of Stel- lar Core Collapse, Astrophys

    M. Liebend¨ orfer, A Simple Parameterization of the Con- sequences of Deleptonization for Simulations of Stel- lar Core Collapse, Astrophys. J. 633, 1042 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504072 [astro-ph]

    2005

  97. [105]

    S. E. Woosley and A. Heger, Nucleosynthesis and rem- nants in massive stars of solar metallicity, Physics Re- ports 442, 269 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0702176 [astro- ph]

    2007

  98. [106]

    S. E. Woosley, A. Heger, and T. A. Weaver, The evo- lution and explosion of massive stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1015 (2002)

    2002

  99. [107]

    Banik, M

    S. Banik, M. Hempel, and D. Bandyopadhyay, New Hy- peron Equations of State for Supernovae and Neutron Stars in Density-dependent Hadron Field Theory, As- trophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 214, 22 (2014), arXiv:1404.6173 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014

  100. [108]

    A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, Core- collapse Supernova Equations of State Based on Neu- tron Star Observations, Astrophys. J. 774, 17 (2013), arXiv:1207.2184 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013

  101. [109]

    J. M. Lattimer and F. D. Swesty, A generalized equation of state for hot, dense matter, Nucl. Phys. A 535, 331 (1991)

    1991

  102. [110]

    Hempel and J

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, A statistical model for a complete supernova equation of state, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 210 (2010), arXiv:0911.4073 [nucl-th]

    2010

  103. [111]

    Hempel, T

    M. Hempel, T. Fischer, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, New Equations of State in Simula- tions of Core-collapse Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 748, 70 (2012), arXiv:1108.0848 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012

  104. [112]

    G. Shen, C. J. Horowitz, and E. O’Connor, Second rela- tivistic mean field and virial equation of state for astro- physical simulations, Phys. Rev. C 83, 065808 (2011)

    2011

  105. [113]

    A. G. Abac and et al (LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collabora- tion), GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, ApJ Lett. 995, L18 (2025), arXiv:2508.18080 [gr-qc]

    2025

  106. [114]

    A. Nitz, I. Harry, D. Brown, C. M. Biwer, J. Willis, T. D. Canton, C. Capano, T. Dent, L. Pekowsky, G. S. C. Davies, S. De, M. Cabero, S. Wu, A. R. Williamson, B. Machenschalk, D. Macleod, F. Pan- narale, P. Kumar, S. Reyes, dfinstad, S. Kumar, M. T´ apai, L. Singer, P. Kumar,...

    2024

  107. [115]

    J. W. Tukey, An introduction to the calculation of nu- merical spectrum analysis, Spectra Analysis of Time Se- ries , 25 (1967)

    1967

  108. [116]

    Alzubi, A

    J. Alzubi, A. Nayyar, and A. Kumar, Machine learn- ing from theory to algorithms: An overview, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1142, 012012 (2018)

    2018

  109. [117]

    A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, Ridge regression: Ap- plications to nonorthogonal problems, Technometrics 12, 69 (1970)

    1970

  110. [118]

    Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

    R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 58, 267 (1996)

    1996

  111. [119]

    Breiman, Random forests, Mach

    L. Breiman, Random forests, Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    2001

  112. [120]

    Smola and B

    A. Smola and B. Scholkopf, A tutorial on support vector regression, Statistics and Computing 14, 199 (2004)

    2004

  113. [121]

    Prokhorenkova, G

    L. Prokhorenkova, G. Gusev, A. Vorobev, A. V. Doro- gush, and A. Gulin, Catboost: unbiased boosting with categorical features, in Proceedings of the 32nd Inter- national Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS’18 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 20...

    2018

  114. [122]

    G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T.-Y. Liu, Lightgbm: a highly efficient gra- dient boosting decision tree, in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, NIPS’17 (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, ...

    2017

  115. [123]

    Chen and C

    T. Chen and C. Guestrin, Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Dis- covery and Data Mining , KDD ’16 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2016) p. 785–794

    2016

  116. [124]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, et al. , Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python, the Journal of machine Learning re- search 12, 2825 (2011)

    2011

  117. [125]

    C. D. C. D. Lewis, Industrial and business forecasting methods : a practical guide to exponential smoothing and curve fitting (Butterworth Scientific, 1982)

    1982

  118. [126]

    F. J. Massey, The kolmogorov-smirnov test for goodness of fit, Journal of the American Statistical Association 46, 68 (1951)

    1951

  119. [127]

    M¨ uller, Multi-dimensional relativistic simulations of core-collapse supernovae with energy-dependent neu- trino transport , Ph.D

    B. M¨ uller, Multi-dimensional relativistic simulations of core-collapse supernovae with energy-dependent neu- trino transport , Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen, M¨ unchen, Germany (2009)

    2009

  120. [128]

    Sakan, N

    A. Sakan, N. Ussipov, E. Abdikamalov, A. Akhmetali, M. Zaidyn, A. Zhunuskanov, J. A. Font, M. C. Edwards, and S. Abylkairov, Probing Supernovae through gravi- tational wave entropy, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2511.08010 (2025), arXiv:2511.08010 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  121. [129]

    S. E. Gossan, P. Sutton, A. Stuver, M. Zanolin, K. Gill, and C. D. Ott, Observing gravitational waves from core- collapse supernovae in the advanced detector era, Phys. Rev. D 93, 042002 (2016), arXiv:1511.02836 [astro- ph.HE]

    2016

  122. [130]

    M. J. Szczepa´ nczyk, J. M. Antelis, M. Benjamin, M. Cavagli` a, D. Gondek-Rosi´ nska, T. Hansen, S. Kli- menko, M. D. Morales, C. Moreno, S. Mukherjee, G. Nurbek, J. Powell, N. Singh, S. Sitmukhambetov, P. Szewczyk, O. Valdez, G. Vedovato, J. Westhouse, M. Zanolin, and Y. Zhe...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.