Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Local certification of forbidden subgraphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12148 v2 pith:KVAAUP6L submitted 2024-02-19 cs.DC cs.DMcs.DS

classification cs.DCcs.DMcs.DS
keywords certificationforbiddenlocalnetworksizesubgraphcertificatedistributed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Detecting specific structures in a network has been a very active theme of research in distributed computing for at least a decade. In this paper, we start the study of subgraph detection from the perspective of local certification. Remember that a local certification is a distributed mechanism enabling the nodes of a network to check the correctness of the current configuration, thanks to small pieces of information called certificates. Our main question is: For a given graph $H$, what is the minimum certificate size that allows checking that the network does not contain $H$ as a (possibly induced) subgraph? We show a variety of lower and upper bounds, uncovering an interesting interplay between the optimal certificate size, the size of the forbidden subgraph, and the locality of the verification. Along the way we introduce several new technical tools, in particular what we call the \emph{layered map}, which is not specific to forbidden subgraphs and that we expect to be useful for certifying many other properties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Complexity landscape for local certification

    cs.DC 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    On anonymous paths local certification has a gap between O(1) and Θ(log log n), and a natural property with optimal Θ(log log n) certificates exists; on cycles the gap is between O(1) and Θ(log n).

Pith tools