Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

SU(2) polarization evolution on higher-order Poincar\'e sphere by using general $q$-plate

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A continuously tunable q-plate, with its topological charge matched to the sphere's order, can drive complete SU(2) polarization evolution on a higher-order Poincaré sphere.

desk verdict The Eq. (5) basis slip is a reparable presentation error, and the 'complete coverage' claim needs proof; the paper is a sound, modest theoretical extension that should go to peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20286 v1 pith:KW3KRBBU submitted 2025-06-25 physics.optics

Mohammad Umar , P. Senthilkumaran This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.25.Ja42.79.-e
keywords higher-orderPoincarésphereq-plateSU(2)polarizationevolutionSO(3)rotationtopologicalchargePoincaré-HopfindexstructuredlightStokesparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what a q-plate does to beams represented on a higher-order Poincaré sphere (HOPS), the sphere whose poles are circularly polarized vortex beams of equal and opposite topological charge. It argues that if the plate's topological charge $q$ equals the sphere's order $\eta$, the plate's action keeps the beam on that same sphere, and the output is reached by an SO(3) rotation around an equatorial axis set by the plate's offset angle. It then shows that this single global rotation decomposes, point by point across the beam, into ordinary local rotations on the standard Poincaré sphere. Finally it claims that a general q-plate with retardance continuously tunable from $0$ to $2\pi$ and offset angle from $0$ to $\pi/2$ provides complete coverage of SU(2) polarization evolution on the HOPS, making the higher-order sphere a practical arena for polarization control of structured light.

What carries the argument

The central object is the general q-plate Jones matrix $M(\delta, \alpha(\phi))$ with fast-axis orientation $\alpha(\phi)=q\phi+\alpha_0$, where $q$ is the topological charge, $\alpha_0$ the offset angle, and $\delta$ the retardance. The load-bearing identity is the topological matching condition $q=\eta$, which guarantees that an HOPS beam of order $\eta$ remains on the same sphere after passing through the plate. The matrix encodes both the global rotation, whose axis is fixed by $\alpha_0$, and the local rotations, whose axes are fixed by the $q\phi$ term, so the same SU(2) object carries the entire global-local decomposition.

What would settle it

Take an $\eta=1$ HOPS beam, send it through a $q=1$ q-plate, sweep $\delta$ over $[0,2\pi]$ and $\alpha_0$ over $[0,\pi/2]$, and measure the output HOPS Stokes parameters; if any point on the sphere is unreachable or any predicted circular trajectory is missed, the completeness claim fails. A complementary check is to derive the q-plate's Jones matrix directly in the $|R_\ell\rangle,|L_\ell\rangle$ basis and test whether the condition for staying on the same sphere is exactly $q=\eta$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a q-plate whose topological charge $q$ equals the order $\eta$ of a higher-order Poincaré sphere acts as an SU(2) element that rotates the beam on that same sphere. A single such operation, a global SO(3) rotation on the HOPS, is shown to be equivalent to many local SO(3) rotations on the ordinary Poincaré sphere, one for each transverse point of the beam, because beam and plate share the same azimuthal topology. The rotation axis for the global rotation lies in the equatorial plane of the HOPS and is fixed by the offset angle $\alpha_0$, making an angle $2\alpha_0$ with the $S_1^{(\eta)}$-axis, while the rotation angle is the retardance $\delta$. With $\delta$ continuously tunable from $0$ to $2\pi$ and $\alpha_0$ from $0$ to $\pi/2$, the paper asserts that complete SU(2) polarization evolution on the HOPS is achievable, for any order $\eta$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the q-plate's Jones matrix written in linear polarization components in Eq. (5) can be applied directly to the circularly polarized vortex basis states in Eq. (7); no basis transformation is shown, so the intermediate amplitude formulas do not follow from Eq. (5) as written.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For an HOPS beam of order $\eta$, a q-plate with $q=\eta$ keeps the output on the same sphere, so the plate acts as a true polarization rotator for structured light rather than a mode scrambler.
  • The offset angle $\alpha_0$ selects the global rotation axis in the equatorial plane, so tuning $\alpha_0$ and retardance $\delta$ gives a reconfigurable SU(2) element on the HOPS.
  • A global rotation on the HOPS decomposes into local rotations on the standard Poincaré sphere, so pointwise measurements of the SOP before and after the plate should reveal that local rotation pattern.
  • Continuous tuning of $\delta$ from $0$ to $2\pi$ and $\alpha_0$ from $0$ to $\pi/2$ traces every circular trajectory of the kind shown on the HOPS, which is the basis for programmable structured-light polarization control.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the global-local decomposition suggests a q-plate implements different local SU(2) rotations at different transverse positions simultaneously, so the same device acts as a parallel bank of waveplates for position-dependent polarization control.
  • Editorial inference: if the basis issue flagged in the weakest assumption is repaired, the topological condition might acquire a phase correction; a direct circular-basis derivation would test whether $q=\eta$ remains exact for all $\alpha_0$ and $\delta$ or only for special values.
  • Editorial inference: the same reasoning should extend to higher orders, so a natural test is to sweep $\delta$ for an $\eta=2$ sphere and compare the predicted trajectory with measured HOPS Stokes parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the action of a general q-plate on higher-order Poincaré sphere (HOPS) beams. It derives a topological matching condition q = η (η the HOPS order), interprets the q-plate transformation as a global SO(3) rotation on the HOPS that decomposes into local SO(3) rotations on the standard Poincaré sphere, and claims that a q-plate with continuously tunable retardance δ ∈ [0, 2π] and offset angle α0 ∈ [0, π/2] provides complete SU(2) polarization evolution on the HOPS. The derivation is self-contained and contains no fitted parameters.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers a simple unifying picture of q-plate-induced transformations on HOPS beams, connecting the global SO(3) rotation on HOPS with local rotations on the standard Poincaré sphere. The topological condition q = η is a useful design rule, and the claimed complete coverage with a tunable q-plate would be practically relevant for reconfigurable structured-light optics. The manuscript is free of empirical fitting; the central steps are analytic and reproducible from the provided equations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4, Eqs. (5)–(9)] There is a basis mismatch between the Jones matrix and the states it acts on. Eq. (5) is the symmetric Jones matrix in the linear (x, y) basis with real off-diagonal elements, but Eq. (7) applies it directly to the circular-basis kets |R_ℓ> and |L_ℓ>. Since |R> and |L> are linear combinations of |x> and |y>, the correct action requires the unitary-transformed matrix M_circ = [[cos(δ/2), i exp(-2iα(φ)) sin(δ/2)], [i exp(2iα(φ)) sin(δ/2), cos(δ/2)]]. As written, Eqs. (8) and (9) do not follow from Eq. (5). The authors should either state explicitly that Eq. (5) is expressed in the circular basis (which it is not, given the real off-diagonal elements and the subsequent extraction formulas in Eq. (6)), or include the basis transformation. The final topological condition q = η is unaffected when the correct circular-basis matrix is used, but the derivation as printed needs correction.
  2. [§6, Fig. 5] The central claim of Section 6—that the general q-plate provides 'complete coverage' on the HOPS—is supported only by three illustrative circular trajectories in Fig. 5. No proof is given that varying δ ∈ [0, 2π] and α0 ∈ [0, π/2] reaches every point on the HOPS. Since the rotation axes n(α0) lie in the equatorial plane and δ is the rotation angle, the set of rotations {R_{n(α0)}(δ)} is known to act transitively on the sphere, but the paper does not demonstrate this transitivity or provide an exhaustive numerical scan. Please add a rigorous argument or a quantitative coverage analysis; otherwise the completeness claim is an assertion rather than a demonstrated result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4, Eq. (8)–(9)] The notation ψ1 and ψ2 is used for the output amplitudes in the |R> and |L> basis, but the subscripts are not defined; it would help to write ψ_R' and ψ_L' consistently with Eq. (10).
  2. [§1 and §4] There are several typographical issues: 'Poinca´ e Hopf (PH) index' should be 'Poincaré-Hopf (PH) index'; 'q Q-plate' in Section 5 is an awkward construction and should be 'q-plate' or 'Q-plate'; and the conclusion says the output remains 'on the same world' where 'sphere' is intended.
  3. [Fig. 5 and its caption] The caption lists panels (b), (c), and (d), but the text refers to Fig. 5(b) for circle 1, Fig. 5(c) for circle 2, and Fig. 5(d) for circle 3; please check that the panel references match the actual layout.
  4. [References] Reference [9] appears to carry a DOI from Physical Review A (10.1103/PhysRevA.106.023520) while the citation is to an Optics Express article; please verify and correct the DOI.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the q=η condition is derived from the same-HOPS constraint, not assumed, and the rotation/evolution claims are direct Jones-matrix calculations with no fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The topological condition q=η is obtained by applying the q-plate Jones matrix to an HOPS input and requiring the output to preserve the HOPS basis phase factors e^{∓iℓϕ}, so that it remains on the same sphere (Eqs. (8)-(10)); this is a consistency condition derived from the equations, not an a priori assumption. The 'global SO(3) = collection of local SO(3) rotations' statement is a geometric interpretation of the same direct calculation, with axes determined by α0 and qϕ, and it is not used to derive the subsequent SU(2) evolution. The claimed complete coverage for δ∈[0,2π] and α0∈[0,π/2] is supported by rotations about equatorial axes; although the paper illustrates only three circles rather than giving an explicit transitivity proof, that is an evidentiary gap, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [4,5,14,24]) supply background definitions—PH index, HOPS Stokes coordinates, and q-plate context—and are not the load-bearing justification for the new results. There are no fitted parameters, no prediction that reduces to a fit by construction, and no uniqueness claim imported from the authors' prior work. The only notable issue, namely that Eq. (5) is written in a linear basis while applied to circular kets in Eq. (7), is a presentation inconsistency; the resulting Eqs. (8)-(9) are in fact the correct circular-basis action, so this does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation uses standard group theory and the conventional HOPS basis. No parameters are fitted to data and no new entities are postulated. The main fragility is the assumed form of the Jones matrix and its basis of application.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The two-to-one homomorphism SU(2) -> SO(3) describes waveplate actions as rotations on the Poincaré sphere.
    Invoked in the introduction and used throughout to interpret q-plate transformations as rotations; standard group theory.
  • domain assumption The fast axis orientation of a q-plate is α(ϕ)=qϕ+α0 with integer or half-integer q.
    Introduced in Section 3 as the defining property of a q-plate; this is a physical modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption The Jones matrix of a waveplate with retardance δ and fast axis α has the form in Eq. (5).
    The paper asserts this form, but in the circular basis the correct matrix has complex off-diagonal terms; this is the key fragile premise.
  • standard math The basis states |R_ℓ>=e^{-iℓϕ}|R> and |L_ℓ>=e^{iℓϕ}|L> are orthonormal and describe the HOPS order ℓ.
    Used to define HOPS beams in Section 2; standard construction from Ref [2].
  • standard math The Stokes parameters for HOPS beams are constructed as S1=2Re[ψRψL*], S2=2Im[ψRψL*], S3=|ψR|^2-|ψL|^2.
    Used in Section 2 to map beams to sphere coordinates; from Ref [14].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SU(2) polarization evolution on higher-order Poincar\'e sphere by using general $q$-plate." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KW3KRBBU

@misc{pith2026250620286,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SU(2) polarization evolution on higher-order Poincar\'e sphere by using general $q$-plate},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KW3KRBBU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20286}
}
abstract

This paper investigates the rotational dynamics on the higher-order Poincar\'e sphere with the use of $q$-plate by exploring three key aspects: the topological condition, the global-local rotation, and the SU(2) polarization evolution on the sphere. The polarized light beam corresponding to this sphere and $q$-plates shares analogous topological features, characterized by azimuthal variation. We have formulated the topological condition that establishes a connection between the $q$-plate and the higher-order Poincar\'e sphere, enabling the SU(2) polarization evolution on the same higher-order Poincar\'e sphere. Leveraging this correspondence, we have shown that a single \textit{global} SO(3) rotation on the higher-order Poincar\'e sphere is a collection of multiple \textit{local} SO(3) rotations on the standard Poincar\'e sphere. SO(3) is related to SU(2) through a two-to-one surjective homomorphism, with SU(2) serving as its double cover. Moreover, we demonstrate that a general $q$-plate, defined by a continuously tunable retardance ranging from $0$ to $2\pi$ and an offset angle ranging from $0$ to $\pi/2$, provides the complete coverage on the higher-order Poincar\'e sphere.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20286 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Color online). The geometry of the PS (η = 0) and HOPS (η = 1), along with their corresponding polarization distributions represented as individual points on the surface, are shown. Here, 2γ (η) and 2χ (η) denote the longitude and latitude coordinates, respectively. Red and blue colors represent right-handed and left-handed polarization, respectively. The vortex phase corresponding to the RCP and LCP eigenstates is… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Color online). Geometry of the q-plate structure for three distinct configurations corresponding to q = 1/2 with α0 = 0 (first geometry), q = 1 with α0 = 0 (second geometry), and q = 1 with α0 = π/4 (third geometry). the relation M11(δ) = (M22(δ))∗ , while the off-diagonal elements are identical, i.e, M12(δ) = M21(δ) and are purely real. This Jones matrix is also an SU(2) matrix (detM(δ) = 1 and M(δ) †M(δ) = I), en… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Color online). Transformation of an input HOPS (η = 1) beam with coordinates (2γ (1) , 2χ (1)) = (0, π/4) into an output HOPS (η = 1) beam with coordinates (2γ (1) , 2χ (1)) = (π/4, 0), induced by a q Q-plate with offset angle α0 = 0. This transformation corresponds to an SO(3) rotation on the HOPS. (2γ (1) , 2χ (1)) = (0, π/4) passes through a q Q-plate with an offset angle α0 = 0. Upon exiting the q Q-plate, the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Color online). (a) A magnified view of the polarization evolution on the HOPS as illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Color online). (a) Three circular trajectories labeled as 1, 2 and 3 are shown on the HOPS for η = 1, with points placed at angular intervals of π/4 at each trajectory. For each circle, the polarization evolution is demonstrated by applying a q-plate to an input beam …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SU(2) gadget for higher-order Poincar\'{e} sphere

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two quarter-wave q-plates plus one half-wave q-plate, in any order, form a universal SU(2) gadget for arbitrary polarization transformations on the higher-order Poincaré sphere.

  2. Mathematics of effective $q$-plate in polarization optics

    physics.optics 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Three-q-plate stacks, when fast axes satisfy alignment conditions, act as a single effective q-plate; three of the eight Q/H combinations give continuously tunable retardance over 0 to 2π.

  3. Gadget to realize arbitrary polarization transformation on a higher order Poincar\'e sphere

    physics.optics 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A four-element gadget of two q-plates and two half-wave plates is proposed to transform any polarization state on a higher-order Poincaré sphere into any other, but the central Jones derivation is internally inconsistent.

  4. Holonomically constrained polarization transformation

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured polarization beam with topological index η keeps its sphere and topological signature under a q-plate only when the plate's charge q equals η, a condition the authors use to define separate topological in...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Poincare, Theorie mathematique de la lumiere (gauthiers-villars, paris 1892) vol

    H. Poincare, Theorie mathematique de la lumiere (gauthiers-villars, paris 1892) vol. 2, See also HG Jerrard: J. Opt. Soc. Amer 44 (634) (1954) 12, doi: 10.1364/JOSA.44.000634

    work page doi:10.1364/josa.44.000634 1954

  2. [2]

    Milione, H

    G. Milione, H. Sztul, D. Nolan, R. Alfano, Higher-order poincar´ e sphere, stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light, Physical Review Letters 107 (5) (2011) 053601, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.053601

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.053601 2011

  3. [3]

    Freund, Polarization singularity indices in gaussian laser beams, Optics communications 201 (4-6) (2002) 251–270, doi: 10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01725-4

    I. Freund, Polarization singularity indices in gaussian laser beams, Optics communications 201 (4-6) (2002) 251–270, doi: 10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01725-4

    doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(01)01725-4 2002

  4. [4]

    Senthilkumaran, S

    Ruchi, P. Senthilkumaran, S. K. Pal, Phase singularities to polarization singularities, In- ternational Journal of Optics 2020 (1) (2020) 2812803, doi: 10.1155/2020/2812803

    doi:10.1155/2020/2812803 2020

  5. [5]

    Senthilkumaran, Singularities in physics and engineering, IOP Publishing, 2024, doi: 10.1088/978-0-7503-4982-6

    P. Senthilkumaran, Singularities in physics and engineering, IOP Publishing, 2024, doi: 10.1088/978-0-7503-4982-6

    work page doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-4982-6 2024

  6. [6]

    Naidoo, F

    D. Naidoo, F. S. Roux, A. Dudley, I. Litvin, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, A. Forbes, Con- trolled generation of higher-order poincar´ e sphere beams from a laser, Nature Photonics 10 (5) (2016) 327–332, doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2016.37

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.37 2016

  7. [7]

    S. Chen, X. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Ling, H. Luo, S. Wen, Generation of arbitrary cylindrical vector beams on the higher order poincar´ e sphere, Optics Letters 39 (18) (2014) 5274–5276, doi: 10.1364/OL.39.005274

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.39.005274 2014

  8. [8]

    K. Ji, D. Lin, I. A. Davidson, S. Wang, J. Carpenter, Y. Amma, Y. Jung, M. Guasoni, D. J. Richardson, Controlled generation of picosecond-pulsed higher-order poincar´ e sphere beams from an ytterbium-doped multicore fiber amplifier, Photonics Research 11 (2) (2023) 181–188, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.475287

    work page doi:10.1364/prj.475287 2023

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Liu, C. Zhou, K. Yu, Y. Liu, G. Wang, B. Yan, H. Liu, Generation of arbitrary vector or- bital angular momentum beams on higher-order poincar´ e spheres based on an all-dielectric metasurface with complex amplitude modulation, Optics Express 32 (19) (2024) 33494– 33506, doi...

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    J. Yao, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, A. Wang, Generation and detection of high-order poincar´ e sphere beams, in: Seventeenth National Conference on Laser Technology and Optoelec- tronics, Vol. 12501, SPIE, 2022, pp. 108–112, doi: 10.1117/12.2655583

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Y. Liu, X. Ling, X. Yi, X. Zhou, H. Luo, S. Wen, Realization of polarization evolution on higher-order poincar´ e sphere with metasurface, Applied Physics Letters 104 (19), doi: 10.1063/1.4878409 (2014)

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    W. Xu, S. Chen, S. Wen, H. Luo, Polarization evolution on the higher-order poincar´ e sphere via photonic dirac points, Physical Review A 104 (1) (2021) 013504, doi: 10.1103/Phys- RevA.104.013504

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    J. Yao, X. Jiang, J. Zhang, A. Wang, Q. Zhan, Quantitative detection of high-order Poincar´ e sphere beams and their polarization evolution, Optics Express 31 (2) (2023) 3017–3027, doi: 10.1364/OE.479386. 11

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Bansal, P

    S. Bansal, P. Senthilkumaran, Stokes polarimetry with Poincar´ e–Hopf index beams, Optics and Lasers in Engineering 160 (2023) 107295, doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107295

    2023

  7. [15]

    Fickler, L

    R. Fickler, L. Kopf, M. Ornigotti, Higher-order poincar´ e spheres and spatiospectral poincar´ e beams, Physical Review Research 6 (3) (2024) 033298, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevRe- search.6.033298

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    S. K. Pal, L. A. Rusch, Tight focusing of obstructed radially-azimuthally polarized higher order poincar´ e sphere beams, in: Nonlinear Photonics, Optica Publishing Group, 2024, pp. JTu1A–42, doi: 10.1364/BGPP.2024.JTu1A.42

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    H. Yang, K. Ou, Q. Liu, M. Peng, Z. Xie, Y. Jiang, H. Jia, X. Cheng, H. Jing, Y. Hu, et al., Metasurface higher-order poincar´ e sphere polarization detection clock, Light: Science & Applications 14 (1) (2025) 63, doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01738-1

    2025 doi

  10. [18]

    Marrucci, C

    L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, D. Paparo, Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media, Physical Review Letters 96 (16) (2006) 163905, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Marrucci, The q-plate and its future, Journal of Nanophotonics 7 (1) (2013) 078598– 078598, doi: 10.1117/1.JNP.7.078598

    L. Marrucci, The q-plate and its future, Journal of Nanophotonics 7 (1) (2013) 078598– 078598, doi: 10.1117/1.JNP.7.078598

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    Rubano, F

    A. Rubano, F. Cardano, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, Q-plate technology: a progress review, Journal of the optical society of america B 36 (5) (2019) D70–D87, doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.36.000D70

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Delaney, M

    S. Delaney, M. M. S´ anchez-L´ opez, I. Moreno, J. A. Davis, Arithmetic with q-plates, Ap- plied optics 56 (3) (2017) 596–600, doi: 10.1364/AO.56.000596

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Machavariani, Y

    G. Machavariani, Y. Lumer, I. Moshe, A. Meir, S. Jackel, Spatially-variable retardation plate for efficient generation of radially-and azimuthally-polarized beams, Optics Commu- nications 281 (4) (2008) 732–738, doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2007.10.088

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    Kadiri, G

    G. Kadiri, G. Raghavan, Wavelength-adaptable effective q-plates with passively tunable retardance, Scientific Reports 9 (1) (2019) 11911, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48163-8

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Bansal, S

    S. Bansal, S. Kumar Pal, P. Senthilkumaran, Use of q-plate as a coupler, Applied Optics 59 (16) (2020) 4933–4938, doi: 10.1364/AO.395728

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Ghatak, Polarization of Light with Applications in Optical Fibers, SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, 2011, doi: 10.1117/3.861761. 12

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.