Topics in Hyperplane arrangements - Errata
classification
🧮 math.CO
keywords
propositionformulabookcorrectincorrectaccordinglyaffectedarrangement
read the original abstract
We have received an e-mail from Bryan Gillespie pointing out that a proposition, that is Proposition 8.5, of our book, [1] is incorrect as stated. The given formula (8.5) is valid only in the generic case that is assuming that for any point of the arrangement $p, X_p$ is formed by a basis. The correct proposition is slightly weaker, in general one must replace Formula 8.5 of the book with the next Formula (3). Accordingly one has to change Proposition 9.2 in the obvious way. The remaining parts of the book are not affected but one should remove the first line of 11.3.3 which quotes the incorrect formula. Here we discuss the correct proposition, replacing Proposition 8.5.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.