Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Chemistry in the Galactic Center

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Ultra-sensitive spectral surveys toward the Galactic Center cloud G+0.693-0.027 report 23 new interstellar molecules, 17 of them prebiotic precursors, evidence that the interstellar medium is a source of life's building blocks.

desk verdict A useful, candid review of the G+0.693 prebiotic-molecule detections, but the origin-of-life punchline rests on an unproven full-sputtering assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01782 v1 pith:KYEYYRMG submitted 2025-01-03 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords GalacticCentercomplexorganicmoleculesprebioticchemistryinterstellaricesmolecularcloudshocksmillimeterspectroscopyastrochemistryG+0.693-0.027
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultra-sensitive, unbiased spectral surveys toward the Galactic Center cloud G+0.693-0.027 have turned up 23 new interstellar molecules, 17 of them molecules that prebiotic-chemistry schemes list as precursors of ribonucleotides, nucleobases, amino acids, sugars, carboxylic acids, proto-proteins, and proto-lipids. The paper reports gas-phase abundances between about $5\times10^{-12}$ and $5\times10^{-10}$ relative to H$_2$, and argues that these molecules are produced on dust-grain ices and released by low-velocity shocks. If this is right, the interstellar medium is an efficient source of prebiotic material that could have been delivered to the early Earth and to other planets, so the chemistry of life may begin in space.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the molecular cloud G+0.693-0.027, whose low excitation temperatures ($T_{\rm ex}\le 15$ K) and clean low-frequency spectra make it an unusually good laboratory for identifying new molecules despite broad ~20 km/s line profiles. The release mechanism is a low-velocity (~20 km/s) shock that, the paper assumes, fully sputters the icy mantles of dust grains and injects grain-surface-formed complex organic molecules into the gas phase. Quantum tunneling isomerization is the mechanism invoked to explain why high-energy isomers of several molecules appear under cold interstellar conditions.

What would settle it

Measure the infrared absorption bands of, say, urea or carbonic acid in the solid phase toward G+0.693; if a substantial icy column density of these molecules remains on the dust grains, the full-sputtering assumption and the derived ice fractions are wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's central claim is that the Galactic Center cloud G+0.693-0.027 is a working factory of prebiotic complex organic molecules. Over 170 molecular species have been identified in the 7 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm surveys, including 23 new interstellar detections (a number that excludes urea), with 17 of prebiotic relevance. The new species include precursors of ribonucleotides (urea, hydroxylamine), nucleobases (cyanomethanimine isomers), amino acids (vinyl amine, ethyl amine), sugars ((Z)-1,2-ethenediol), carboxylic acids (carbonic acid), proto-proteins (monothioformic acid), and proto-lipids (ethanolamine, n-propanol). Their abundances fall in the range $\sim 5\times10^{-12}$ to $\sim 5\times10^{-10}$ relative to H$_2$, and the inferred ice fractions of 0.3 to 7 ppm with respect to water are comparable to meteoritic values. The author concludes from these detections that the interstellar medium is a significant source of prebiotic material that could have contributed to the origin of life on Earth and elsewhere.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the assumption that the ~20 km/s shock toward G+0.693 has fully sputtered the ice mantles, so the gas-phase abundances measured today reproduce the original composition of the dust-grain ices.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the full-sputtering reading is right, the fraction of these prebiotic compounds locked in interstellar ices is about 0.3 to 7 ppm relative to water, matching the fractions measured in meteorites for some of the same compounds.
  • Galactic Center molecular clouds become a plausible source of prebiotic material that could have been delivered to early Earth during the Late Heavy Bombardment.
  • The same shock-driven release of icy material, in a scaled-down form, should occur in ordinary star-forming regions, since protostars also produce shocks and cosmic-ray enhancements.
  • Gas-phase abundance ratios fall in a regular pattern for homologous families: adding one CH$_2$ group lowers abundance by roughly an order of magnitude for alcohols, thiols, and isocyanates, while amines drop more steeply and cyanides more gently.
  • High-energy isomers detected in cold clouds need not signal hot, energetic chemistry; quantum tunneling can drive isomerization at low temperatures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader can test the grain-surface story directly: infrared ice observations toward G+0.693 should reveal solid-state features of at least some of these molecules, and large residual ice columns would undercut the full-sputtering assumption.
  • If sputtering is incomplete, the reported ice fractions should be read as upper limits rather than true mantle abundances, so the meteorite comparison is only as strong as the full-sputtering assumption.
  • The regular abundance ladder suggests a predictive extension: future surveys of other clouds should find the same order-of-magnitude drop per CH$_2$ group in alcohols, thiols, and isocyanates if grain-surface formation is universal.
  • Because similar shocks operate around young stars, the prebiotic inventory found at the Galactic Center may also be delivered to planet-forming disks, making interstellar inheritance a general route to planetary prebiotic pools.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This IAU proceedings article reviews recent molecular line surveys toward the Galactic Center cloud G+0.693-0.027, conducted with the IRAM 30m and Yebes 40m telescopes. The author reports the detection of 23 new interstellar molecules, 17 of prebiotic interest, with gas-phase abundances relative to H2 of roughly 5e-12 to 5e-10, and interprets these as evidence that grain-surface chemistry in the Galactic Center produces prebiotic precursors that could have been delivered to Earth. The paper also discusses formation and survivability mechanisms for these species, the detection of high-energy isomers, abundance trends with chemical complexity, and additional first detections such as HOCS+, HNSO, NaS, MgS, and SiC2.

Significance. If the underlying detections and abundance measurements are correct, the central astrobiological claim—that Galactic Center GMCs are efficient factories of prebiotic molecules and that the ISM is an important source of prebiotic material—is significant and of broad interdisciplinary interest. The paper is valuable as a concise, well-referenced summary of a systematic survey program that has produced a remarkable number of first interstellar detections. It also makes testable predictions for future ALMA, ngVLA, and SKA observations. The review is not a primary data paper; its reliability rests on the cited detection papers, and its quantitative interpretation depends on an explicit but not independently demonstrated assumption of complete ice sputtering in G+0.693.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1 (including the footnote)] The conversion of measured gas-phase abundances into ice fractions of ~0.3-7 ppm with respect to water, and the subsequent comparison with meteorites, rests on two premises: that the detected species formed purely on grain surfaces, and that the ~20 km/s shock in G+0.693 fully sputters the ice mantles into the gas phase. The manuscript cites Caselli et al. (1997) and Jimenez-Serra et al. (2008) for the sputtering claim, but provides no model calculation for the specific density, shock speed, or grain properties of G+0.693. Moreover, the text itself concedes that C2H3NH2 and PO+ may be formed in the gas phase, so the 'formed purely on grain surfaces' premise explicitly fails for at least two species. Since this conversion is the only quantitative link between the detections and the origin-of-life conclusion, the paper should either present a specific sputtering calculation for G+0.693 or explicitly state that the 0.3-7 ppm values are conditional upper limits and weaken the corresponding statement in the Abstract.
  2. [Table 1 and §5.4] Table 1 lists abundance values without uncertainties, even though Figure 4, which uses these abundances, claims that errors are shown for all plotted species. Without error bars or a reference to the specific tables in the original detection papers, the reader cannot assess whether the measured abundance range quoted in the Abstract (5e-12 to 5e-10) or the abundance trends discussed in §5.4 are statistically robust. Because the paper is a review of previously published measurements, a column with relative uncertainties or explicit pointers to the original tables would materially improve its usefulness.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Table 1] The Abstract and §5.1 state that measured abundances range from ~5e-12 to ~5e-10 with respect to H2, but Table 1 lists PO+ at 4.5e-12, below the stated lower bound; the range should be revised or the entry explicitly noted as the lowest value.
  2. [Table 1] There are typos in the 'Precursor of' column: 'Vynil amine' should be 'Vinyl amine', 'Carboxilic Acids' should be 'Carboxylic Acids', and the conformer labels 'Ga-n-propanol' and 'Aa-n-propanol' are not defined in the text and should be explained.
  3. [§3] The phrase 'the first quiral molecule detected in the ISM' should read 'the first chiral molecule detected in the ISM'.
  4. [References] The reference list is incomplete for 'Sanz-Novo, M., Rivilla, V. M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2024,' which lacks journal, volume, and page information; the in-press citations 'Jimenez-Serra, Codella & Belloche 2024' and 'Lopez-Gallifa et al. in prep.' should also be formatted consistently.
  5. [Figure 1 and §4] The text in §4 refers to 'see black cross in Figure 3' when referring to the location of G+0.693, but the figure is numbered as Figure 1; the cross-reference should be corrected.
  6. [§4] The sentence 'the number of rotational transitions present in the measured spectra is significantly smaller as compared to hotter sources' is awkwardly phrased and should be revised for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Proceedings review compiles the author's own external detections; the full-sputtering step is an explicit assumption, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

This paper is a proceedings review of the author's group's spectral surveys toward G+0.693. The 23 detections and abundances in Tables 1 and 2 are not derived in this paper; they are imported from prior peer-reviewed detection papers (e.g., Jimenez-Serra et al. 2020; Rivilla et al. 2021a; Sanz-Novo et al. 2023), which are externally falsifiable spectroscopic results. The only original quantitative step in the review is the conversion of gas-phase abundances to ice fractions in Section 5.1: 'their fraction in interstellar ices would be ~0.3-7 ppm with respect to water, assuming that all ices are sputtered into the gas phase.' This is an explicit assumption, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and the footnote cites both an external reference (Caselli et al. 1997) and the author's own Jimenez-Serra et al. 2008. Because the paper labels the full-sputtering premise as an assumption and does not present equations that reduce to their own inputs, I find no specific circular reduction that meets the evidentiary bar. The heavy self-citation load is normal for a summary of an ongoing program, and the underlying detections are external, so the review does not make a circular derivation of its central claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This ledger captures the assumptions and literature inputs the review's prebiotic-delivery conclusion depends on. It introduces no new free parameters of its own; the abundance numbers and physical conditions are imported from earlier papers, mostly by the same group. The most consequential assumptions are the correctness of the cited line identifications, complete shock-driven sputtering of the ice mantles, and the unquantified delivery of interstellar molecules to early Earth.

free parameters (3)
  • Molecular abundances of detected species relative to H2 = ~5e-12 to ~5e-10
    Taken from LTE and rotation-diagram fits in the cited detection papers; the review's prebiotic and meteorite-comparison arguments use these numbers directly.
  • Shock velocity in G+0.693 = ~20 km/s
    Adopted from prior modeling and used to justify the assumption of complete sputtering of ice mantles.
  • Cosmic-ray ionization rate enhancement = >100x standard
    From the HOCS+ chemical model summarized in Sanz-Novo et al. (2024a); used to support the energetic-processing picture.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Line identifications and column densities in the cited detection papers are correct.
    The review provides no spectra or fit residuals; Table 1 and the 23-new-molecules count are imported from prior papers.
  • domain assumption The roughly 20 km/s shock in G+0.693 fully sputters the ice mantles into the gas phase.
    Stated in the Section 5.1 footnote; needed to equate gas-phase COM abundances with grain-mantle ice composition.
  • domain assumption The detected prebiotic COMs formed predominantly on dust grains before release.
    Section 5.1 says most form on grain surfaces but names C2H3NH2 and PO+ as possible gas-phase products; the meteorite comparison assumes the grain-surface fraction is representative.
  • domain assumption The prebiotic systems chemistry schemes correctly identify these molecules as precursors of life's building blocks.
    The prebiotic relevance of the detected species is defined by terrestrial chemistry schemes from prior literature; the review does not test these schemes.
  • domain assumption Interstellar molecules can be delivered to early Earth and contribute to the origin of life.
    The abstract and conclusions assert this without a quantitative delivery, survival, or incorporation model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chemistry in the Galactic Center." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KYEYYRMG

@misc{pith2026250101782,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chemistry in the Galactic Center},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KYEYYRMG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01782}
}
read the original abstract

Gas and dust in the Galactic Center are subjected to energetic processing by intense UV radiation fields, widespread shocks, enhanced rates of cosmic-rays and X-rays, and strong magnetic fields. The Giant Molecular Clouds in the Galactic Center present a rich chemistry in a wide variety of chemical compounds, some of which are prebiotic. We have conducted unbiased, ultrasensitive and broadband spectral surveys toward the G+0.693-0.027 molecular cloud located in the Galactic Center, which have yielded the discovery of new complex organic molecules proposed as precursors of the "building blocks" of life. I will review our current understanding of the chemistry in Galactic Center molecular clouds, and summarize the recent detections toward G+0.693-0.027 of key precursors of prebiotic chemistry. All this suggests that the ISM is an important source of prebiotic material that could have contributed to the process of the origin of life on Earth and elsewhere in the Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01782 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Integrated intensity map of the Class I CH3OH maser at 36 GHz obtained with the Yebes 40m telescope toward the Sgr B2 molecular cloud. Black cross indicates the location of G+0.693, where we have conducted our deep spectroscopic surveys with the IRAM 30m and Yebes 40m telescopes. Symbols show the location of the Sgr B2(N), (M) and DS massive star-forming regions. of the G+0.693 molecular cloud is a cloud-cloud colli… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of precursors of ribonucleotides, amino acids and nucleobases proposed in the chemical schemes of Powner et al. (2009), Patel et al. (2015) and Kitadai & Maruyama (2018). This Figure has been updated from the work of Jimenez-Serra et al. (2020) with the recent detection of 1,2-ethenediol (Rivilla et al. 2022a). Solid boxes indicate molecules that have been detected in space, while black dotted boxes denote t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frequency coverage of the spectroscopic surveys carried out at 7mm, 3mm, and 2mm toward the G+0.693 molecular cloud with the Yebes 40m and the IRAM 30m radiotelescopes. The observed spectra present a miriad of molecular rotational lines. For details on the surveys, see Sanz-Novo et al. (2023). suggests that the ISM is an important source of prebiotic material that could have been deliv￾ered to Earth during the Late … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the abundances of molecular species of the form CH3-X, C2H5-X, C3H7-X, and C4H9-X measured toward G+0.693, with X the functional groups -OH (for alcohols; see red squares), -NH2 (for amines; green squares), -SH (for thiols; blue circles), -CN (cyanides; l…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measuring metal sulfides in interstellar dust with PRIMA

    astro-ph.IM 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulations show PRIMA's FIRESS instrument could detect MgS and FeS dust absorption bands at 20-50 μm with S/N≥5 in one hour against sources brighter than 200 mJy.

  2. Complex Organic Molecules towards the central molecular zone of NGC 253

    astro-ph.GA 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Complex organic molecules in the center of NGC 253 emit from two gas components and most likely trace large-scale shocks, with nitrogen-bearing species depleted toward GMC 7.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2023, A&A, 669, A93 Armijos-Abenda˜no, J., Martin-Pintado, J., Lopez, E., et al

    Alberton, D., Bizzocchi, L., Jiang, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A93 Armijos-Abenda˜no, J., Martin-Pintado, J., Lopez, E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 57 Armijos-Abenda˜no, J., Martin-Pintado, J., Requena-Torres, M. A., et al. 2019, A&A, 624, A112

  2. [2]

    2019, Science, 366, 76

    Becker, S., Feldmann, J., Wiedemann, S., et al. 2019, Science, 366, 76

  3. [3]

    T., M¨uller, H

    Belloche, A., Garrod, R. T., M¨uller, H. S. P., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A10

  4. [4]

    T., M¨uller, H

    Belloche, A., Garrod, R. T., M¨uller, H. S. P., & Menten, K. M. 2014, Science, 345, 1584

  5. [5]

    Belloche, A., M¨uller, H. S. P., Menten, K. M., Schilke, P., & Comito, C. 2013, A&A, 559, A47

  6. [6]

    M., Comito, C., et al

    Belloche, A., Menten, K. M., Comito, C., et al. 2008, A&A, 482, 179

  7. [7]

    M., et al

    Bizzocchi, L., Prudenzano, D., Rivilla, V . M., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A98

  8. [8]

    W., & Havnes, O

    Caselli, P., Hartquist, T. W., & Havnes, O. 1997, A&A, 322, 296

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    1988, A&A, 189, L1

    Cernicharo, J., Kahane, C., Guelin, M., & Gomez-Gonzalez, J. 1988, A&A, 189, L1

  2. [10]

    B., Kress, M

    Charnley, S. B., Kress, M. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Millar, T. J. 1995, ApJ, 448, 232

  3. [11]

    & Sagan, C

    Chyba, C. & Sagan, C. 1992, Nature, 355, 125

  4. [12]

    C., Glover, S

    Clark, P. C., Glover, S. C. O., Ragan, S. E., Shetty, R., & Klessen, R. S. 2013, ApJL, 768, L34

  5. [13]

    2017, A&A, 605, L3

    Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., Caselli, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, L3

  6. [14]

    M., Roberts, D

    Crutcher, R. M., Roberts, D. A., Mehringer, D. M., & Troland, T. H. 1996, ApJL, 462, L79

  7. [15]

    E., Linke, R

    Cummins, S. E., Linke, R. A., & Thaddeus, P. 1986, ApJS, 60, 819

  8. [16]

    J., Brogan, C

    Cyganowski, C. J., Brogan, C. L., Hunter, T. R., & Churchwell, E. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1615

  9. [17]

    R., Cernicharo, J., et al

    Etxaluze, M., Goicoechea, J. R., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A137

  10. [18]

    Fatima, M., M¨uller, H. S. P., Zingsheim, O., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A25

  11. [19]

    Field, G. B. 1974, ApJ, 187, 453

  12. [20]

    2022, Astrobiology, 22, 598

    Fiore, M., Chieffo, C., Lopez, A., et al. 2022, Astrobiology, 22, 598

  13. [21]

    N., Snyder, L

    Friedel, D. N., Snyder, L. E., Turner, B. E., & Remijan, A. 2004, ApJ, 600, 234 12 I. Jim ´enez-Serra Garcia de la Concepcion, J., Colzi, L., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A150 Garcia de la Concepcion, J., Jimenez-Serra, I., Carlos Corchado, J., Rivilla, V . M., & ...

  14. [22]

    T., Widicus Weaver, S

    Garrod, R. T., Widicus Weaver, S. L., & Herbst, E. 2008, ApJ, 682, 283

  15. [23]

    2016, A&A, 586, A50

    Ginsburg, A., Henkel, C., Ao, Y ., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A50

  16. [24]

    R., Santa-Maria, M

    Goicoechea, J. R., Santa-Maria, M. G., Teyssier, D., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, L1

  17. [25]

    R., Etxaluze, M., Cernicharo, J., et al

    Goicoechea, J. R., Etxaluze, M., Cernicharo, J., et al. 2013, ApJL, 769, L13

  18. [26]

    R., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N

    Goicoechea, J. R., Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., & Cernicharo, J. 2004, ApJ, 600, 214

  19. [27]

    R., Indriolo, N., et al

    Goto, M., Geballe, T. R., Indriolo, N., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 96

  20. [28]

    R., & Usuda, T

    Goto, M., Indriolo, N., Geballe, T. R., & Usuda, T. 2013, Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 117, 9919

  21. [29]

    M., Ungerechts, H., & Churchwell, E

    Guesten, R., Walmsley, C. M., Ungerechts, H., & Churchwell, E. 1985, A&A, 142, 381

  22. [30]

    & Henkel, C

    Guesten, R. & Henkel, C. 1983, A&A, 125, 136

  23. [31]

    & Downes, D

    Guesten, R. & Downes, D. 1980, A&A, 87, 6

  24. [32]

    2015, A&A, 584, A102

    Harada, N., Riquelme, D., Viti, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A102

  25. [33]

    & Kenyon, S

    Hartmann, L. & Kenyon, S. J. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 207

  26. [34]

    D., Ginsburg, A., Haworth, T

    Henshaw, J. D., Ginsburg, A., Haworth, T. J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2457

  27. [35]

    & van Dishoeck, E

    Herbst, E. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 427

  28. [36]

    J., Tanarro, I., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Herrero, V . J., Tanarro, I., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 1058

  29. [37]

    2017, AJ, 154, 38

    Holdship, J., Viti, S., Jimenez-Serra, I., Makrymallis, A., & Priestley, F. 2017, AJ, 154, 38

  30. [38]

    M., Jewell, P

    Hollis, J. M., Jewell, P. R., Lovas, F. J., Remijan, A., & Møllendal, H. 2004, ApJL, 610, L21

  31. [39]

    M., Lovas, F

    Hollis, J. M., Lovas, F. J., Jewell, P. R., & Coudert, L. H. 2002, ApJL, 571, L59

  32. [40]

    M., Lovas, F

    Hollis, J. M., Lovas, F. J., & Jewell, P. R. 2000, ApJL, 540, L107

  33. [41]

    M., et al

    Jimenez-Serra, I., Martin-Pintado, J., Rivilla, V . M., et al. 2020, Astrobiology, 20, 1048

  34. [42]

    2014, ApJL, 787, L33

    Jimenez-Serra, I., Testi, L., Caselli, P., & Viti, S. 2014, ApJL, 787, L33

  35. [43]

    Jimenez-Serra, I., Caselli, P., Martin-Pintado, J., & Hartquist, T. W. 2008, A&A, 482, 549

  36. [44]

    A., Burton, M

    Jones, P. A., Burton, M. G., Cunningham, M. R., Tothill, N. F. H., & Walsh, A. J. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 221

  37. [45]

    A., Burton, M

    Jones, P. A., Burton, M. G., Cunningham, M. R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2961

  38. [46]

    A., Burton, M

    Jones, P. A., Burton, M. G., Tothill, N. F. H., & Cunningham, M. R. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 2293 Jørgensen, J. K., van der Wiel, M. H. D., Coutens, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A117

  39. [47]

    2017, A&A, 603, A89

    Kauffmann, J., Pillai, T., Zhang, Q., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, A89

  40. [48]

    & Maruyama, S

    Kitadai, N. & Maruyama, S. 2018, Geoscience Frontiers, 9, 1117

  41. [49]

    2024, A&A, 681, A64

    Konstantopoulou, C., De Cia, A., Ledoux, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A64

  42. [50]

    2017, ApJ, 850, 77

    Krieger, N., Ott, J., Beuther, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 77

  43. [51]

    Kurtz, S., Hofner, P., & Alvarez, C. V . 2004, ApJS, 155, 149 Le Petit, F., Ruaud, M., Bron, E., et al. 2016, A&A, 585, A105

  44. [52]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 556

    Li, J., Wang, J., Qiao, H., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 556

  45. [53]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 115

    Li, J., Shen, Z., Wang, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 115

  46. [54]

    & Wilson, T

    Liechti, S. & Wilson, T. L. 1996, A&A, 314, 615

  47. [55]

    Ligterink, N. F. W., Calcutt, H., Coutens, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A28

  48. [56]

    C., Serabyn, E., Zylka, R., & Li, Y

    Lis, D. C., Serabyn, E., Zylka, R., & Li, Y . 2001, ApJ, 550, 761

  49. [57]

    A., Martin-Pintado, J., & Mauersberger, R

    Martin, S., Requena-Torres, M. A., Martin-Pintado, J., & Mauersberger, R. 2008, ApJ, 678, 245

  50. [58]

    1997, ApJL, 482, L45

    Martin-Pintado, J., de Vicente, P., Fuente, A., & Planesas, P. 1997, ApJL, 482, L45

  51. [59]

    2023, A&A, 678, A45

    Massalkhi, S., Jimenez-Serra, I., Martin-Pintado, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A45

  52. [60]

    2021, ApJ, 909, 123

    Mate, B., Carrasco-Herrera, R., Timon, V ., et al. 2021, ApJ, 909, 123

  53. [61]

    K., Rocha, W

    McClure, M. K., Rocha, W. R. M., Pontoppidan, K. M., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 431

  54. [62]

    A., Carroll, P

    McGuire, B. A., Carroll, P. B., Dollhopf, N. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 76

  55. [63]

    A., Carroll, P

    McGuire, B. A., Carroll, P. B., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2016, Science, 352, 1449

  56. [64]

    M., Snyder, L

    Mehringer, D. M., Snyder, L. E., Miao, Y ., & Lovas, F. J. 1997, ApJL, 480, L71 Menor Salvan, C., Bouza, M., Fialho, D. M., et al. 2020, ChemBioChem, 21, 3504 Chemistry in the Galactic Center 13

  57. [65]

    2009, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 30, 250

    Menor-Salvan, C., Ruiz-Bermejo, M., Osuna-Esteban, S., & Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S. 2009, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 30, 250

  58. [66]

    Mills, E. A. C., Ginsburg, A., Immer, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 868, 7

  59. [67]

    Mills, E. A. C. & Morris, M. R. 2013, ApJ, 772, 105 M¨oller, T., Schilke, P., Schmiedeke, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A9

  60. [68]

    M., Furuya, K., et al

    Molpeceres, G., Rivilla, V . M., Furuya, K., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 6061

  61. [69]

    2022, A&A, 663, A41

    Molpeceres, G., Jimenez-Serra, I., Oba, Y ., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A41

  62. [70]

    2021, ApJ, 923, 159

    Molpeceres, G., Garcia de la Concepcion, J., & Jimenez-Serra, I. 2021, ApJ, 923, 159

  63. [71]

    2000, ApJS, 128, 213

    Nummelin, A., Bergman, P., Hjalmarson, A., et al. 2000, ApJS, 128, 213

  64. [72]

    1998, ApJS, 117, 427

    Nummelin, A., Bergman, P., Hjalmarson, A., et al. 1998, ApJS, 117, 427

  65. [73]

    R., Goto, M., et al

    Oka, T., Geballe, T. R., Goto, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 54

  66. [74]

    2017, ApJ, 837, 174

    Oya, Y ., Sakai, N., Watanabe, Y ., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 174

  67. [75]

    K., & Fontani, F

    Padovani, M., Marcowith, A., Galli, D., Hunt, L. K., & Fontani, F. 2021, A&A, 649, A149

  68. [76]

    H., Percivalle, C., Ritson, D

    Patel, B. H., Percivalle, C., Ritson, D. J., Duffy, C. D., & Sutherland, J. D. 2015, Nature Chemistry, 7, 301

  69. [77]

    C., et al

    Pillai, T., Kauffmann, J., Tan, J. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 74

  70. [78]

    W., Gerland, B., & Sutherland, J

    Powner, M. W., Gerland, B., & Sutherland, J. D. 2009, Nature, 459, 239

  71. [79]

    L., McGuire, B

    Pulliam, R. L., McGuire, B. A., & Remijan, A. J. 2012, ApJ, 751, 1

  72. [80]

    J., Hollis, J

    Remijan, A. J., Hollis, J. M., Lovas, F. J., et al. 2008, ApJL, 675, L85

  73. [81]

    E., Liu, S

    Remijan, A., Snyder, L. E., Liu, S. Y ., Mehringer, D., & Kuan, Y . J. 2002, ApJ, 576, 264

  74. [82]

    A., Martin-Pintado, J., Martin, S., & Morris, M

    Requena-Torres, M. A., Martin-Pintado, J., Martin, S., & Morris, M. R. 2008, ApJ, 672, 352

  75. [83]

    A., Martin-Pintado, J., Rodriguez-Franco, A., et al

    Requena-Torres, M. A., Martin-Pintado, J., Rodriguez-Franco, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 455, 971

  76. [84]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 174R

    Rey-Montejo, M., Jimenez-Serra, I., Martin-Pintado, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 174R

  77. [85]

    M., Sanz-Novo, M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Rivilla, V . M., Sanz-Novo, M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2023, ApJL, 953, L20

  78. [86]

    M., Martin-Pintado, J., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Rivilla, V . M., Martin-Pintado, J., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2020, ApJL, 899, L28

  79. [87]

    M., Martin-Pintado, J., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Rivilla, V . M., Martin-Pintado, J., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, L114

  80. [88]

    M., Jimenez-Serra, I., Zeng, S., et al

    Rivilla, V . M., Jimenez-Serra, I., Zeng, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, L30

  81. [89]

    J., Martin-Pintado, J., de Vicente, P., et al

    Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., Martin-Pintado, J., de Vicente, P., et al. 2000, A&A, 356, 695

  82. [90]

    2014, Chemical Reviews, 114, 285, pMID: 24171674 San Andres, D., Rivilla, V

    Ruiz-Mirazo, K., Briones, C., & de la Escosura, A. 2014, Chemical Reviews, 114, 285, pMID: 24171674 San Andres, D., Rivilla, V . M., Colzi, L. et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 39S

  83. [91]

    M., M¨uller, H

    Sanz-Novo, M., Rivilla, V . M., M¨uller, H. S. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965L, 26S

  84. [92]

    M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Sanz-Novo, M., Rivilla, V . M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2024,

  85. [93]

    M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Sanz-Novo, M., Rivilla, V . M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 3

  86. [94]

    N., Burton, M

    Shetty, R., Beaumont, C. N., Burton, M. G., Kelly, B. C., & Klessen, R. S. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 720

  87. [95]

    Slate, E. C. S., Barker, R., Euesden, R. T., Revels, M. R., & Meijer, A. J. H. M. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 5413

  88. [96]

    2018, A&A, 612, A102

    Terrier, R., Clavel, M., Soldi, S., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A102

  89. [97]

    2010, ApJ, 719, 143

    Terrier, R., Ponti, G., Belanger, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 143

  90. [98]

    2015, ApJ, 810, 111 V oronkov, M

    Vazart, F., Latouche, C., Skouteris, D., Balucani, N., & Barone, V . 2015, ApJ, 810, 111 V oronkov, M. A., Brooks, K. J., Sobolev, A. M., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 411

  91. [99]

    M., Guesten, R., Angerhofer, P., Churchwell, E., & Mundy, L

    Walmsley, C. M., Guesten, R., Angerhofer, P., Churchwell, E., & Mundy, L. 1986, A&A, 155, 129

  92. [100]

    Whittet, D. C. B. & Duley, W. W. 1991, A&ARA, 2, 167 Widicus Weaver, S. L., Laas, J. C., Zou, L., et al. 2017, ApJS, 232, 3

  93. [101]

    M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al

    Zeng, S., Rivilla, V . M., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 1448

  94. [102]

    M., et al

    Zeng, S., Jimenez-Serra, I., Rivilla, V . M., et al. 2021, ApJL, 920, L27

  95. [103]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 4896 14 I

    Zeng, S., Zhang, Q., Jimenez-Serra, I., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4896 14 I. Jim ´enez-Serra

  96. [104]

    M., et al

    Zeng, S., Jimenez-Serra, I., Rivilla, V . M., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2962

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.