Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 27 references

Laser-plasma acceleration in a conical plasma channel with longitudinally inhomogeneous plasma profile

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read With a conical plasma channel and a rising density profile, the paper reports a 5.79-fold stronger wakefield and a 2.14-fold higher bunch momentum.

desk verdict The headline boost factors are not density-controlled and the text contradicts itself on the baseline; the cone-plus-gradient idea is plausible but needs proper matched-density simulations. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04021 v1 pith:KYOIPUIC submitted 2025-06-04 physics.plasm-ph physics.acc-ph

D. S. Bondar , W. Leemans , V. I. Maslov , I. N. Onishchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.acc-ph PACS 29.17.+w41.75.Lx
keywords laserwakefieldaccelerationconicalplasmachannellongitudinaldensitygradientself-injectedelectronbunchprofileparticle-in-cellsimulationphasesynchronization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that a practical channel design—a cone-shaped plasma channel whose density increases along the laser direction—can substantially improve a laser wakefield accelerator's output. In particle-in-cell simulations, the design raises the accelerating field at the self-injected bunch from 216 GV/m to about 1250 GV/m (a factor of 5.79) and raises the bunch's longitudinal momentum from about 36 to 76.9 times $m_e c$ (a factor of 2.14). The paper explains the improvement as the combination of two effects: the conical wall stops the laser from spreading and compresses it on axis, while the rising density keeps the bunch in the accelerating phase of the wakefield. If true, the scheme would be a relatively simple modification of existing channel-based laser-plasma accelerators to produce higher-energy, higher-charge bunches.

What carries the argument

The central object is the conically tapered plasma channel with a monotonically increasing longitudinal density profile. Mechanically, the cone acts as a waveguide that confines and axially compresses the laser pulse, raising the on-axis electromagnetic energy density, while the density gradient keeps the self-injected bunch locked to the accelerating phase of the wakefield and raises the local wakefield amplitude through the $E_z \sim \sqrt{n_e}$ scaling. In the simulation the two effects are combined, producing the reported 5.79-fold field increase and 2.14-fold momentum increase over a uniform cylinder.

What would settle it

Run the same parameters in a cylindrical channel with a uniform density equal to the local density at the position of the self-injected bunch in the conical-ramp case; if the on-axis accelerating field there approaches the reported 1250 GV/m, the 5.79-fold gain is mostly the known $E_z \sim \sqrt{n_e}$ scaling rather than the conical geometry and phase synchronization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a conical plasma channel with a density that increases along the laser-propagation direction accelerates a self-injected electron bunch substantially better than a homogeneous cylindrical channel. In the simulations the on-axis accelerating field in the bunch region reaches about 1250 GV/m in the inhomogeneous conical channel versus about 216 GV/m in the cylinder—a factor of 5.79—and the bunch mean longitudinal momentum rises from about $36 m_e c$ to about $76.9 m_e c$, a factor of 2.14. The paper also reports that the conical wall concentrates laser energy on axis (1.41 times the cylindrical case), and that the ramp keeps the bunch as a single 75 pC structure rather than the split 63.9 pC and 5.64 pC structures seen in the cylinder. The conclusion drawn is that the conical shape and the density gradient act together: one confines the laser, the other preserves the accelerating phase.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on treating the uniform cylindrical channel with density $1.5n_{e0}$ as a fair baseline for a conical channel whose density rises above that value, so that the reported gain is attributed to the cone and ramp rather than to the known increase of wakefield amplitude with density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A conical channel with a rising density profile could be implemented as a shaped plasma target, so existing laser facilities might test the scheme without a new laser system.
  • The reported single 75 pC bunch structure suggests the density ramp suppresses the bunch splitting seen in the cylindrical case, which would improve charge and bunch quality together.
  • Because the bunch is ultrarelativistic, the 2.14-fold momentum gain corresponds to a similar gain in energy; extending the channel length is the natural next step.
  • The combined geometry-plus-ramp approach implies that channel shape and density profile should be optimized together rather than independently.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An important untested control is a cylindrical channel whose uniform density matches the local density at the bunch in the conical-ramp case; without it, the $E_z \sim \sqrt{n_e}$ scaling may account for a large share of the reported 5.79-fold gain.
  • The phase-synchronization mechanism could be tested directly by tracking the bunch position relative to the wakefield bubble over propagation distance; the paper reports the outcome but not this diagnostic.
  • The same conical-ramp design may help other wakefield schemes where dephasing limits energy gain, such as external-injection or beam-driven wakefields, because the mechanism is phase maintenance rather than injection itself.
  • If the on-axis energy-density concentration observed in two-dimensional geometry persists in three-dimensional simulations, the channel could also reduce the laser power needed for a given wakefield amplitude.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports 2D3V particle-in-cell simulations (WarpX) of laser wakefield acceleration in three plasma channel configurations: a homogeneous cylindrical channel, a homogeneous conical channel, and a conical channel with a longitudinally increasing plasma density. The authors claim that the inhomogeneous conical channel increases the accelerating field by a factor of at least 5.79 and the self-injected bunch longitudinal momentum by a factor of 2.14 relative to the homogeneous cylindrical channel, and that it also increases the bunch charge relative to a homogeneous conical channel. They attribute the improvement to the combined effect of conical wall focusing of the laser and the longitudinal density gradient maintaining the bunch in the accelerating phase of the wakefield.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the combination of a conical plasma channel with an increasing longitudinal density profile would be a simple and attractive design for improving laser wakefield accelerator performance. The paper uses a modern, well-regarded PIC code (WarpX) and compares three distinct channel geometries, which is a useful framework. The reported increase in bunch charge in the inhomogeneous conical channel (75 pC versus 44.5 pC for the homogeneous conical channel) and the observed increase in on-axis laser energy density are interesting, less confounded results. However, the headline quantitative claims are not adequately supported because the comparisons are not density-controlled and the reported factors are internally inconsistent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results of simulation] The central comparison (1250 GV/m versus 216 GV/m, a factor of 5.79) is not density-controlled. The cylindrical baseline has a uniform density ne,cyl = 1.5 ne0, while the inhomogeneous conical channel has a longitudinally increasing density profile whose local value at the bunch is never reported. Since the paper itself states that Ez ~ sqrt(ne), a factor of 5.79 could be produced by a density ratio of roughly 33 between the rear of the conical channel and 1.5 ne0. The authors must either report the density profile along the axis and at the bunch location, or add control simulations (e.g., a cylindrical channel with the same rear density, or a cylindrical channel with the same increasing density profile) to separate the density effect from the conical-geometry and phase-synchronization effects.
  2. [Results of simulation] The attribution of the reported factors is inconsistent. The text first computes the 5.79x field increase from the cylindrical case (216 GV/m to 1250 GV/m), then later states that the inhomogeneous conical channel 'compared to a homogeneous conical channel ... provides a higher acceleration rate (by 5.79 times)', even though the accelerating field in the homogeneous conical channel is never reported. The 2.14x momentum factor is computed relative to the cylindrical first bunch (36 mec), not to the homogeneous conical bunch (44.2 mec), which would yield only about 1.74x. The numerical claims should be recomputed and presented against an explicitly stated, single baseline for each quantity.
  3. [Statement of the problem / Results of simulation] No numerical convergence or resolution study is provided. The simulation parameters list the domain size and macroparticle count but not the cell size, time step, or any test of resolution dependence. Since the main claim concerns peak field values in different geometries, the reported 5.79x ratio could be affected by grid resolution and numerical effects. Please include the cell sizes (dx, dz), the timestep, and a convergence test demonstrating that the reported field and momentum values are converged.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The text contains numerous grammatical and typographical errors (e.g., 'to increase of the energy', 'a conical channels', 'and compress it'); the manuscript needs careful language editing.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption lists '(b) Conical channel' but should read 'Inhomogeneous conical channel' for consistency with the text and with panel (c) labeled 'Conical homogeneous channel'.
  3. [Results of simulation] The sentence beginning 'In the case of inhomogeneous cylindrical channel, in contrast to a homogeneous cylindrical channel' appears to describe the homogeneous conical channel, not the inhomogeneous cylindrical channel; please correct this misstatement.
  4. [Conclusions] The phrase 'increase in the acceleration field by at least 5.79 times' is ambiguous; use 'by a factor of 5.79' or 'more than 5.79 times' to avoid confusion about the direction of the comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the field and momentum gains are genuine WarpX simulation outputs; the main weakness is an uncontrolled density/geometry comparison, which is a confound rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are presented as PIC simulation results (WarpX), not as quantities derived from an equation that already contains the answer. The 216 GV/m versus 1250 GV/m fields, the pz values, and the charge values are reported from simulations; they are not obtained by fitting a parameter to target outputs or by substituting the desired conclusion into the model. The quoted scaling Ez ~ sqrt(ne) is used only as a qualitative rationale in the problem statement and is not the source of the 5.79x number. The inhomogeneous density ramp is an input, but observing its effect in a simulation is a legitimate prediction, not a circularity, even though a matched-density cylindrical control would make the causal attribution cleaner. The self-citations [15,16,17,26] are background and motivation; the conical focusing advantage is also re-tested in this paper via the observed 1.41x energy-density increase, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The notable weakness is that the cylindrical baseline has uniform 1.5 ne0 while the conical channel uses an unreported increasing profile, so part of the gain may be the known density scaling; the paper also shifts the baseline for the 5.79x factor between the cylinder and the homogeneous cone, but these are control and reporting flaws rather than definitional circularities. Score 2 reflects the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations and an imperfect comparison, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The reported gains depend on hand-chosen inputs, including the density profile shape, cone geometry, wall density, laser parameters, and baseline density. These inputs are not derived from first principles and are not scanned. The unvalidated PIC modeling choices add further assumptions, so the comparison factors are properties of the chosen setup rather than general results.

free parameters (5)
  • Longitudinal density profile shape = Increasing profile shown in Fig. 1(b), endpoints not specified
    Central to the claimed phase synchronization; chosen by hand, not derived or scanned.
  • Cone geometry (taper angle and wall position) = Not specified beyond Fig. 1
    Controls laser focusing; no formula or parameter scan is given.
  • Wall density = 100 ne0
    Fixed boundary choice that may affect wakefield and bunch diagnostics.
  • Laser parameters a0, w0, T_full = a0=3, w0=4.95 um, T_full=30.6 fs
    Single operating point; no variation over laser parameters.
  • Cylindrical baseline density = 1.5 ne0
    Baseline for comparison; no matched-density control at the inhomogeneous channel rear density.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption WarpX 2D3V particle-in-cell simulation accurately represents the laser-plasma dynamics.
    No code version, grid resolution, convergence tests, or experimental verification are given (Introduction and Results of simulation).
  • domain assumption 2D3V symmetry is adequate for a conical channel.
    The cone is axisymmetric, but 2D3V is not a full 3D model; no comparison to 3D or convergence study is shown.
  • standard math The known scaling Ez ~ sqrt(ne) applies and explains part of the field increase.
    Stated in the Statement of the problem as a known dependence for longitudinal acceleration fields.
  • domain assumption Open field and absorbing particle boundary conditions do not distort the comparison.
    No sensitivity study is reported for boundary effects.
  • domain assumption The macroparticle count of 1.57e6 is sufficient to resolve self-injection and bunch charge.
    No convergence study is reported; charge values are given without error bars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laser-plasma acceleration in a conical plasma channel with longitudinally inhomogeneous plasma profile." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KYOIPUIC

@misc{pith2026250604021,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laser-plasma acceleration in a conical plasma channel with longitudinally inhomogeneous plasma profile},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KYOIPUIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04021}
}
read the original abstract

Laser-plasma acceleration is considered as a modern method of accelerating bunches using a wakefield excited by a laser pulse. This paper demonstrates the use of a longitudinally inhomogeneous increasing plasma density gradient in a conical channel to increase of the energy of a self-injected bunch. Comparison of a conical channels with homogeneous and inhomogeneous plasma and also conical and cylindrical homogeneous channels, shows a clear advantage of an inhomogeneous conical channel. The longitudinally inhomogeneous plasma helps to maintain the self-injected bunch in the wakefield acceleration phase and increases the accelerating gradient. The conical geometry prevents laser pulse expanding, and compress it. The combined effect was shown: the inhomogeneous plasma use, the effect of a conical geometry led to significant increasing the accelerating gradient and longitudinal momentum of the bunch.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04021 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. ,3 shows the density graph and the self-injected bunch in the maximum phase of wakefield acceleration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Density graph ne (z, x), acceleration field Ez(z). Conical channel. t=193.4 fs. Inhomogeneous density profile. The second self-injected bunch is highly inhomogeneous with a complex structure. Its charge is estimated as small (5.64 pC, I=0.113IA) compared to the first bunch (63.9 pC, I=0.236IA), although at certain points the density is high (up to 5 ne0). Charge of self￾injected bunch in inhomogeneous conical channe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Longitudinal momentum pz distribution. Cylindrical channel. t=193.4 fs (relatively to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_7.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Longitudinal momentum pz distribution. Conical channel (inhomogeneous). t=193.4 fs (relatively to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_8.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Longitudinal momentum pz distribution. Cylindrical channel. t=193.4 fs (relatively to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Laser Electron Accelerator

    T. Tajima, J. M. Dawson. “Laser Electron Accelerator” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 1979, v. 43, No. 4, pp. 267–270. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.267

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.267 1979

  2. [2]

    Physics of laser-driven plasma-based accelerators

    E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, W. P. Leemans. “Physics of laser-driven plasma-based accelerators” // Rev. Mod. Phys., 2009, v. 81, No. 3, pp. 1229–1285. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1229 2009

  3. [3]

    Ultra -high gradient acceleration of electrons by laser wakefield plasma waves

    A. C. Ting. “Ultra -high gradient acceleration of electrons by laser wakefield plasma waves” // Proc. 26th IEEE Int. Conf. on Plasma Science, 1999, p. 153. doi: 10.1109/PLASMA.1999.829398

    work page arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Wakefield acceleration based on high power pulsed lasers and electron beams (overview)

    I. N. Onishchenko. “Wakefield acceleration based on high power pulsed lasers and electron beams (overview)” // PABS, 2006, No. 2, (46), pp. 17–24

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Developments in laser -driven plasma accelerators

    S. M. Hooker. “Developments in laser -driven plasma accelerators” // Nat. Photonics, 2013, v. 7, pp. 775–782. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.234

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.234 2013

  6. [6]

    Improvement of Properties of Self - Injected and Accelerated Electron Bunch by Laser Pulse in Plasma, Using Pulse Precursor

    Vasyl Maslov, Denys Bondar, Iryna Levchuk, Ivan Onishchenko. “Improvement of Properties of Self - Injected and Accelerated Electron Bunch by Laser Pulse in Plasma, Using Pulse Precursor” // East european journal of physics, 2019, No. 2, pp. 64-68

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Control of Characteristics of Self -injected and Accelerated Electron Bunch in Plasma by Laser Pulse Shaping on Radius, Intensity and Shape

    V. I. Maslov, D. S. Bondar, V. Grigorencko, I. P. Levchuk, I. N. Onishchenko. “Control of Characteristics of Self -injected and Accelerated Electron Bunch in Plasma by Laser Pulse Shaping on Radius, Intensity and Shape” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2019, No. 6(142), pp. 39–42

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Dynamics of electron bunches at the laser–plasma interaction in the bubble regime

    V. I. Maslov, O. M. Svystun, I. N. Onishchenko, V. I. Tkachenko. “Dynamics of electron bunches at the laser–plasma interaction in the bubble regime” // Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectr ometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2016, v. 829, pp. 422–425. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.04.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.04.018 2016

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Joint wakefield acceleration by laser pulse and by self -injected electron bunches

    V. I. Maslov, O. M. Svystun, I. N. Onishchenko, A. M. Yegorov. “Joint wakefield acceleration by laser pulse and by self -injected electron bunches” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2016, No. 6(106), pp. 144–147

    2016

  2. [10]

    Dynamics of self - injected electron bunches at their acceleration by laser pulse in plasma

    D. S. Bondar, I. P. Levchuk, V. I. Maslov, S. Nikonova, I. N. Onishchenko. “Dynamics of self - injected electron bunches at their acceleration by laser pulse in plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2017, No. 6(112), pp. 76–79

    2017

  3. [11]

    Excitation of wakefield by a laser pulse in a metallic density electron plasma

    D. S. Bondar, V. I. Maslov, I. P. Levchuk, I. N. Onishchenko. “Excitation of wakefield by a laser pulse in a metallic density electron plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2018, No. 6(118), pp. 156–159

    2018

  4. [12]

    GeV electron beams from a laser -wakefield accelerator

    W. P. Leemans, B. Nagler, A. J. Gonsalves, C. Toth, K. Nakamura, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey. “GeV electron beams from a laser -wakefield accelerator” // Nat. Phys., 2006, v. 2, No. 10, pp. 696–699. doi: 10.1038/nphys418

    2006 doi

  5. [13]

    Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser –plasma interactions

    S. P. D. Mangles et al. “Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser –plasma interactions” // Nature, 2004, v. 431, pp. 535-538. doi: 10.1038/nature02939

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    Near -GeV-energy laser - wakefield acceleration of self -injected electrons in a centimeter-scale plasma channel

    F. Tsung, R. Narang, W. B. Mori, C. Joshi, R. Fonseca, L. O. Silva. “Near -GeV-energy laser - wakefield acceleration of self -injected electrons in a centimeter-scale plasma channel” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, v. 93, No. 18, p. 185002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.185002

    2004 doi

  7. [15]

    Investigation of the way of phase synchronization of a self-injected bunch and an accelerating wakefield in solid-state plasma

    V. I. Maslov, D. S. Bondar, I. N. Onishchenko. “Investigation of the way of phase synchronization of a self-injected bunch and an accelerating wakefield in solid-state plasma” // Photonics, 2022, v. 9, 174. doi: 10.3390/photonics9030174

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    A method for maintaining the acceleration rate and increasing the energy of self -injected bunch due to the use of inhomogeneous plasma

    D. S. Bondar, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “A method for maintaining the acceleration rate and increasing the energy of self -injected bunch due to the use of inhomogeneous plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2023, No. 4(146), pp. 67–70. doi: 10.46813/202...

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    On wakefield acceleration in inhomogeneous plasma

    D. S. Bondar, V. I. Maslov, I. N. Onishchenko. “On wakefield acceleration in inhomogeneous plasma” // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology, 2024, No. 3(151), pp. 55–59. doi: 10.46813/2024-151-055

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    Plasma -Density-Gradient Injection of Low Absolute -Momentum-Spread Electron Bunches

    C. G. R. Geddes et al. “Plasma -Density-Gradient Injection of Low Absolute -Momentum-Spread Electron Bunches” // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 100, 215004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.215004

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    Bunch-excited wakefield in dielectric waveguide with hollow plasma channel

    K. V. Galaydych, P. I. Markov, G. V. Sotnikov. “Bunch-excited wakefield in dielectric waveguide with hollow plasma channel” // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 2024, v. 1061, 169156. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2024.169156

    2024

  12. [20]

    Electron acceleration by a radially -polarized laser pulse in a plasma micro -channel

    M. Wen, Y. I. Salamin, C. H. Keitel. “Electron acceleration by a radially -polarized laser pulse in a plasma micro -channel” // Opt. Express, 2019, v. 27, No. 2, pp. 557–566. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.000557

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Pulse propagation and electron acceleration in a corrugated plasma channel

    J. P. Palastro, T. M. Antonsen, S. Morshed, A. York, H. M. Milchberg. “Pulse propagation and electron acceleration in a corrugated plasma channel” // Phys. Rev. E, 2008, v. 77, No. 3, Pt 2, p. 036405. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.036405

    2008 doi

  14. [22]

    Production of high -quality electron bunches by dephasing and beam loading in channeled and unchanneled laser plasma acc elerators

    C. G. R. Geddes, C. Tóth, J. van Tilborg, E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, D. Bruhwiler, C. Nieter, J. Cary, W. P. Leemans. “Production of high -quality electron bunches by dephasing and beam loading in channeled and unchanneled laser plasma acc elerators” // Phys. Plasmas, 2005, v...

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    Application of the Corrugated Plasma Waveguide to Direct Laser Acceleration

    A. York, B. D. Layer, H. M. Milchberg. “Application of the Corrugated Plasma Waveguide to Direct Laser Acceleration” // AIP Conf. Proc., 2006, v. 877, No. 1, pp. 807–811. doi: 10.1063/1.2409219

    2006 doi

  16. [24]

    Pushing the Frontier in the Design of Laser-Based Electron Accelerators with Groundbreaking Mesh -Refined Particle -In-Cell Simulations on Exascale -Class Supercomputers

    L. Fedeli et al. “Pushing the Frontier in the Design of Laser-Based Electron Accelerators with Groundbreaking Mesh -Refined Particle -In-Cell Simulations on Exascale -Class Supercomputers” // SC22: Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Stor age and Analysis, D...

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Synthesizing Particle -In-Cell Simulations through Learning and GPU Computing for Hybrid Particle Accelerator Beamlines

    R. Sandberg et al. “Synthesizing Particle -In-Cell Simulations through Learning and GPU Computing for Hybrid Particle Accelerator Beamlines” // Proc. Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conf. (PASC '24), Zurich, Switzerland, 2024, Art. No. 23, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1145/365...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Dynamics of self -injected bunches in cylindrical and conical plasma channels in laser -plasma acceleration

    D. Bondar, W. Leemans, V. Maslov, I. Onishchenko. “Dynamics of self -injected bunches in cylindrical and conical plasma channels in laser -plasma acceleration” // ХХІІІ Conference of high energy physics and nuclear physics, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 2025, p. 3

    2025

  19. [27]

    High repetition-rate wakefield electron source generated by few-millijoule, 30 fs laser pulses on a density downramp

    Z-H. He et al. “High repetition-rate wakefield electron source generated by few-millijoule, 30 fs laser pulses on a density downramp” // New Journal of Physics. 2013, v. 15, p. 053016; doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053016 ЛАЗЕРНО-ПЛАЗМОВЕ ПРИСКОРЕННЯ В КОНІЧНОМУ ПЛАЗМОВОМУ КАНАЛ...

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.