Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 26 references

PRIMAGAL: a PRIMAger Galactic Plane Far-IR polarization survey to quantify the magnetic fields' role in the formation and evolution of large star-forming filaments

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PRIMAGAL claims a 1,200-hour survey with PRIMAger would reveal magnetic fields around thousands of Milky Way filaments, recovering the structure Planck's five-arcminute beam hides.

desk verdict The 1200-hour survey time is unsupported by the paper's own mapping-speed arithmetic, though the survey design and filtering demo are solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.11187 v1 pith:KZFYIKKH submitted 2025-05-16 astro-ph.GA

S. Molinari , J.D. Soler , V.-M. Pelkonen , A. Nucara , E. Schisano , A. Traficante , C. Mininni , M. Benedettini
show 3 more authors
A. Coletta D. Elia S. Pezzuto
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords GalacticPlanesurveyfar-infraredpolarimetrydustpolarizationmagneticfieldsinterstellarfilamentsstarformationPRIMAgerHi-GAL
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes PRIMAGAL, a far-infrared polarization survey of the Milky Way Galactic Plane with the proposed PRIMAger instrument, and argues it can settle a long-standing question: at what densities and stages does the magnetic field actually control how giant filaments form and fragment into star clusters? The survey would cover a 720-square-degree strip within one degree of the Galactic midplane in four bands at sub-arcminute resolution, in about 1,200 hours of observing, and would measure magnetic field strength and orientation toward roughly five thousand filaments down to 0.4 parsec scales. Its central demonstration is synthetic: radiative-transfer processing of a simulated Milky Way-like galaxy shows that PRIMAger's sharper resolution, combined with filtering out large-scale emission, recovers the filament-scale field structure that Planck's coarse beam smears into a uniform horizontal pattern. If this holds, the survey would be the first statistically meaningful, Galaxy-wide measurement of magnetism's role in star formation, covering the transition from magnetically supported to gravity-dominated clouds.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the synthetic-observation pipeline: a barred-potential MHD simulation of a Milky Way-like galaxy post-processed by the POLARIS radiative transfer code into Stokes I, Q, and U maps at Planck and PRIMAger resolutions. The decisive step is a high-pass filter calibrated by the second-order structure function of polarization angles, which locates the roughly 20-arcminute scale dominated by the mean field; convolving the PRIMAger Stokes maps with a Gaussian of that scale and subtracting recovers the polarization of dense filamentary structures that the diffuse line-of-sight emission otherwise hides. On the measurement side the survey relies on three established estimators: the pNS relations (polarization fraction versus local angle dispersion and column density) for grain-alignment efficiency and field inclination, Polarization Dispersion Analysis — a refinement of the Davis–Chandrasekhar–Fermi method — for plane-of-sky field strength and the turbulence power spectrum, and Histograms of Relative Orientations with the projected Rayleigh statistic for the coupling between density structure and field direction.

What would settle it

On the feasibility side, an updated measurement of PRIMAger's sensitivity in Large Mapping mode would settle the question: a sensitivity twice as bad as the quoted figure of 1.25 MJy/sr per square degree at five-sigma in ten hours would quadruple the time per field and push the 720-square-degree survey beyond roughly 5,000 hours. On the science side, applying the same 20-arcminute-scale high-pass filter to existing Planck polarization data toward bright Hi-GAL filaments would test the key mechanism directly: if no filament-scale polarization structure appears there, the claim that PRIMAger's resolution alone would reveal it is weakened.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper asserts that PRIMAger — four closely packed far-infrared polarization arrays on the proposed PRIMA satellite, with 9 to 24 arcsecond beams across four bands from roughly 90 to 235 μm — is the only facility that combines the sensitivity, resolution, and mapping speed needed to trace magnetic fields from entire filamentary complexes down to the parsec-scale clumps that form star clusters. To support the claim, the authors feed an MHD simulation of a Milky Way-like galaxy through the POLARIS radiative transfer code and produce synthetic Stokes Q and U maps at both Planck and PRIMAger resolution. At Planck resolution the synthetic maps show the essentially uniform horizontal magnetic field seen in real Planck data; after filtering out emission on scales above roughly 20 arcminutes — an operation possible only because PRIMAger resolves many independent beams — a complex field pattern appears, tracking the dense filamentary structures. The paper concludes that a 720-square-degree survey within one degree of the midplane would determine the strength and orientation of magnetic fields toward several thousand Hi-GAL filaments spanning four orders of magnitude in mass and column density, and that the survey fits in about 1,200 hours including all mapping and instrument overheads.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the quoted instrument sensitivity and mapping speed, taken from a companion paper in the same volume and not re-derived here, together with the synthetic demonstration's assumption of perfectly aligned dust grains; if the real instrument is less sensitive than quoted, or real grain misalignment and line-of-sight confusion behave differently than the simulation assumes, the 1,200-hour estimate and the recovered filament-scale field patterns would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A four-band polarization map of the full Galactic Plane strip within one degree of the midplane — 720 square degrees — is feasible within about 1,200 hours of observing, including mapping and instrument overheads.
  • The survey would yield magnetic field strength and orientation toward roughly 5,000 filaments selected from the Hi-GAL catalogue, spanning masses from 10 to $10^5\,M_\odot$ and column densities from $10^{19}$ to $10^{23}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$, from the Central Molecular Zone to the Outer Arm.
  • With that sample, the predicted transition near column density $10^{22}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}$ — where the magnetic field stops being constant with gas density and starts growing with it — can be tested with Galaxy-wide statistics for the first time.
  • Combined with ALMAGAL's data on clump-to-core fragmentation and with Hi-GAL, SEDIGISM, and FUGIN continuum and line surveys, the polarization maps would directly test whether magnetic fields inhibit clump fragmentation and remove angular momentum.
  • The four simultaneously acquired bands give a limited line-of-sight tomography of the field: polarization can be measured at different depths toward optically thick dense structures, and wavelength decorrelation toward the diffuse phase probes the coupling of field and dust.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The large-scale filtering idea could be tested before launch on existing Planck polarization data toward longitudes where the five-arcminute beam still admits a few independent beams; if no filament-scale structure appears there toward bright Hi-GAL filaments, the claim that resolution rather than confusion hides the signal would be weakened.
  • Because the synthetic demonstration assumes perfectly aligned dust grains, the quoted yield of several thousand measurable fields is likely a ceiling: real misalignment and depolarization along the line of sight would push some fraction of the sample below the 3% polarization detection threshold.
  • The survey's four-band maps would double as an all-sky-plane map of polarized-dust spectral decorrelation, which would also help cosmic microwave background experiments subtract Galactic dust foreground in their search for B-mode polarization.
  • The roughly 20-arcminute filter scale quoted in the demonstration comes from a single synthetic sight line; real longitudes have variable line-of-sight confusion, so the filter width will likely need to be position-dependent — a step the authors defer to a future end-to-end pipeline.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes PRIMAGAL, a four-band (96–235 µm) polarimetric survey of the Milky Way Galactic Plane with the PRIMAger instrument, covering |b| ≤ 1° (720 sq deg) in roughly 1200 hours of observing time. The scientific goal is to measure magnetic field strength and orientation in several thousand Hi-GAL filaments, from large-scale assembly to clump fragmentation, at linear resolution down to ~0.4 pc at 8 kpc. To support the concept, the authors post-process an MHD simulation of a Milky Way-like galaxy with the POLARIS radiative transfer code, produce synthetic Stokes I/Q/U maps at Planck and PRIMAger resolutions, and show that high-pass filtering removes the dominant large-scale horizontal field and reveals complex structure. The survey design is anchored to the Hi-GAL filament and clump catalogs, and the analysis plan includes pNS relations, polarization dispersion analysis, and histogram of relative orientations.

Significance. If realized, the survey would deliver the first statistically significant, sub-arcminute-resolution census of magnetic fields across the Galactic Plane, filling the gap between Planck's all-sky but coarse polarization maps and ALMA's high-resolution but narrow fields. The paper's strengths are its concrete, catalog-driven sample (about 5000 filaments from published Hi-GAL catalogs), an explicit accounting of the target polarization sensitivity, and the use of a public radiative transfer code (POLARIS) for the synthetic demonstration. The headline time estimate is internally checkable, and the proposed filtering strategy is a credible way to isolate dense-structure polarization from the diffuse ISM. The main risks are the dependence of the feasibility estimate on companion-paper instrument numbers and the idealized nature of the synthetic demonstration (perfect alignment, single sightline, unpublished simulation); both need to be stated more precisely before the quantitative claims are fully supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3, 'Time estimates'] The mapping-speed numbers are mutually inconsistent as written. The text states that 'a brightness of 1.25 MJy/sr can be reached over a mapped area of 1 sq. deg. at a 5σ level in 10 hours' and that 'our required sensitivity of 1 MJy/sr 1σ will be reached ~1.7 hours for a one sq. deg. map.' Under background-limited noise scaling, the first statement gives a 1σ noise of 0.25 MJy/sr in 10 h, so reaching 1 MJy/sr at 1σ requires (0.25/1)^2 × 10 = 0.625 h, not 1.7 h. Conversely, if 1 MJy/sr at 1σ requires 1.7 h, then in 10 h the 1σ noise would be 1/sqrt(10/1.7) ≈ 0.41 MJy/sr, corresponding to 5σ ≈ 2.06 MJy/sr, not 1.25 MJy/sr. Separately, the stated requirement to detect 3% polarization of a 100 MJy/sr continuum at 5σ implies a polarized brightness of 3 MJy/sr and hence a required 1σ noise of 0.6 MJy/sr; the text instead quotes 1 MJy/sr. Notably, 1.7 h is the time needed to reach 0.6 MJy/sr given the 10 h/1.25 MJy/sr/5σ scaling, so the intended derivation is recoverable, but the written numbers do not close. Because the headline '~1200 hours' is computed as 720 sq deg × 1.7 h, this arithmetic must be corrected and the underlying sensitivity figures taken from the companion paper stated explicitly.
  2. [Section 2, synthetic demonstration] The claim that PRIMAger will 'determine the strength and orientation of magnetic fields towards several thousands of filaments' is supported by a demonstration that assumes perfect dust-grain alignment (silicate grains), a fixed dust composition and size distribution, a single sightline through a simulated galaxy at l = 90°, and one wavelength (235 µm). The MHD simulation itself is not yet published, and the paper states in Section 2 that a full end-to-end pipeline to test variable line-of-sight confusion, filtering techniques, and wavelengths is future work. These assumptions are not failures by themselves, but they mean the synthetic maps cannot yet quantify how the recovered field-strength and orientation accuracies depend on realistic polarization fractions, depolarization, or LOS confusion. Please either add a quantitative test of the recovery (e.g., input-vs-recovered B-angle statistics for representative noise levels and polarization fractions) or soften the corresponding claims in the Abstract and Section 4 to match the current level of validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1] The phrase 'To understand how to role of B changes' should be 'To understand how the role of B changes'.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption says 'PRIMA resolution'; this should read 'PRIMAger resolution'.
  3. [Abstract and Figure 3] The survey area is given as 720 sq deg in the Abstract and Section 3.3, while Figure 3's caption defines the Hi-GAL filament sample region as 640 sq deg (20° ≤ l ≤ 340°). Please clarify whether the survey covers the full 360° in longitude or the 320° sample region, and ensure the time estimate uses the corresponding area.
  4. [Section 3.2] The pNS acronym is introduced but the functional dependence of the polarization fraction p on the local dispersion S and column density N is not described; a brief definition would help readers.
  5. [Section 3.3] The unit '1 MJY/sr' uses inconsistent capitalization; use 'MJy/sr' throughout.
  6. [Code and data availability statement] POLARIS is public, but the MHD simulation is unpublished; state whether the reduced synthetic maps will be released with the paper or upon request.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey feasibility and science demonstration are derived from external instrument inputs and published simulations, with no fitted result renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

This paper is a survey proposal, not a derivation that fits a parameter and then predicts it. The central quantitative claim, that a 720 sq. deg. Galactic Plane polarization survey can be executed in about 1200 hours, is an arithmetic product of the survey area and the PRIMAger sensitivity quoted from the companion papers (Ciesla et al., this volume; Glenn et al., this volume). No parameter is adjusted to force the 1200-hour number, and the instrument sensitivity is an external input rather than something derived in this paper. The synthetic polarization demonstration in Section 2 uses an independent MHD simulation of a Milky-Way-like galaxy and the publicly available POLARIS radiative transfer code, with explicitly stated assumptions on dust composition, size distribution, and perfect grain alignment. The high-pass filtering scale is identified from the second-order structure function of the polarization angles in the synthetic PRIMAger maps rather than chosen to produce a predetermined morphology, so the demonstration is not circular. Self-citations to the authors' Hi-GAL filament and clump catalogs are used to define the target sample and parameter space, which is appropriate input usage rather than load-bearing circular support; the scientific conclusions about magnetic fields are posed as goals of a future survey, not as results derived from those catalogs. The only notable issue is an internal inconsistency in Section 3.3: the stated 10 hours for 5 sigma = 1.25 MJy/sr and the stated 1.7 hours for 1 sigma = 1 MJy/sr are not mutually consistent under ordinary background-limited noise scaling. However, an arithmetic inconsistency between two externally quoted sensitivity figures is a correctness risk, not circularity: the survey time estimate does not reduce to its own input. Because no load-bearing step is defined in terms of its target, and no fitted value is renamed as a prediction, the paper receives a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey's central claims rely on instrument parameters from a companion paper, on an unpublished simulation with an idealized dust model, and on existing catalogs and statistical techniques. No new physical entities are introduced; free parameters are the adopted detection threshold, polarization fraction, and the quoted mapping speed.

free parameters (3)
  • Minimum detectable brightness threshold = 100 MJy/sr
    Chosen as a working figure to allow detection of low-column density filaments (A_V <= 1); directly enters the required sensitivity calculation in Sec. 3.3.
  • Assumed polarization fraction of target emission = 3%
    Adopted to estimate required sensitivity of 1 MJy/sr at 5 sigma; based on polarization fractions observed for nearby Gould Belt filaments, but not derived from the PRIMAGAL targets.
  • PRIMAger mapping speed = 1.25 MJy/sr at 5 sigma in 10 hours per sq deg
    Quoted from Ciesla et al. (this volume); the 1200-hour total depends linearly on this instrument parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PRIMAger instrument performance matches Ciesla et al. specifications.
    Central feasibility estimate in Sec. 3.3.
  • domain assumption The Tress et al. 2024 MHD simulation is representative of the Milky Way's large-scale and small-scale magnetic field structure.
    The synthetic demonstration in Sec. 2 assumes the simulation captures the structure of the Galactic ISM.
  • domain assumption Perfect dust grain alignment and the adopted dust model (62.5% silicate, 37.5% graphite, given size distribution) produce realistic polarization maps.
    POLARIS post-processing in Sec. 2 assumes this; imperfect alignment could reduce polarization and change the filtering behavior.
  • domain assumption Existing catalogs (Hi-GAL) and statistical tools (PDA, pNS, HRO, projected Rayleigh statistic) are applicable to the proposed survey analysis.
    The survey design in Secs. 3.1 and 3.2 relies on these methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PRIMAGAL: a PRIMAger Galactic Plane Far-IR polarization survey to quantify the magnetic fields' role in the formation and evolution of large star-forming filaments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZFYIKKH

@misc{pith2026250511187,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PRIMAGAL: a PRIMAger Galactic Plane Far-IR polarization survey to quantify the magnetic fields' role in the formation and evolution of large star-forming filaments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZFYIKKH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.11187}
}
read the original abstract

The PRIMAger instrument on board the proposed PRIMA satellite will offer the unprecedented capability to obtain hundreds of square-degree maps in polarised emission at sub-arcminute resolution in four Far-IR bands. This will open a unique window to study magnetic fields in our Galaxy. PRIMAGAL, a proposed survey of polarized dust emission in the Milky Way Galactic Plane will determine the strength and orientation of magnetic fields towards several thousands of filamentary clouds in a wide range of linear masses, column densities, evolution, star-formation rates and efficiencies, and Galactic environment. This survey will address for the first time in a statistically significant fashion the role that magnetic fields play in shaping the formation, evolution and fragmentation of dense ISM filaments down to a minimum scale of 0.4 pc up to 8 kpc distance from the Sun. A 4-band polarization survey of the Galactic Plane with |b|<1{\deg} (a total of 720 sq. deg.) can be executed by PRIMAger in about 1200 hours including all mapping and instrument overhead.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. M. Crutcher , B. D. Wandelt , C. Heiles , E. Falgarone , and T. H. Troland , ``Magnetic fields in interstellar clouds from zeeman observations: Inference of total field strengths by bayesian analysis,'' 725 , 466 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Schisano , K

    E. Schisano , K. L. J. Rygl , S. Molinari , G. Busqu\'et , D. Elia , M. Pestalozzi , D. Polychroni , N. Billot , S. J. Carey , R. Paladini , and et al. , ``The identification of filaments on far-infrared and submillimiter images: Morphology, physical conditions and relation with star formation of filamentary structure,'' 791 , 27 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Schisano , S

    E. Schisano , S. Molinari , D. Elia , M. Benedettini , L. Olmi , and et al. , ``The hi-gal catalogue of dusty filamentary structures in the galactic plane,'' 492 , 5420 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Molinari , B

    S. Molinari , B. Swinyard , J. Bally , M. Barlow , J.-P. Bernard , P. Martin , T. Moore , A. Noriega-Crespo , R. Plume , L. Testi , A. Zavagno , A. Abergel , B. Ali , L. Anderson , P. Andr\'e , J.-P. Baluteau , C. Battersby , M. T. Beltr\'an , M. Benedettini , N. Billot , J. Blommaert , S. Bontemps , F. Boulanger , J. Brand , C. Brunt , M. Burton , L. Cal...

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Planck Collaboration , ``Planck intermediate results. xxxv. probing the role of the magnetic field in the formation of structure in molecular clouds,'' 586 , 138 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    J. D. Soler , P. Hennebelle , P. G. Martin , M.-A. Miville-Desch \^e nes , C. B. Netterfield , and L. M. Fissel , ``An imprint of molecular cloud magnetization in the morphology of the dust polarized emission,'' 774 , 128 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Friberg , P

    P. Friberg , P. Bastien , D. Berry , G. Savini , S. F. Graves , and K. Pattle , ``Pol-2: a polarimeter for the james-clerk-maxwell telescope,'' Proc. SPIE 9914 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    D. A. Harper , M. C. Runyan , C. D. Dowell , C. J. Wirth , M. Amato , and et al. , ``Hawc+, the far-infrared camera and polarimeter for sofia,'' J. Astr. Instr. 7 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Pillai , D

    T. Pillai , D. P. Clemens , S. Reissl , P. C. Myers , J. Kauffmann , and et al. , ``Magnetized filamentary gas flows feeding the young embedded cluster in serpens south,'' Nature Astronomy 4 , 1195 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    T. Liu , P. S. Li , M. Juvela , K. T. Kim , N. J. Evans , II, and et al. , ``A holistic perspective on the dynamics of g035.39-00.33: The interplay between gas and magnetic fields,'' 859 , 151 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Planck Collaboration , ``Planck intermediate results. xix. an overview of the polarized thermal emission from galactic dust,'' 576 , 104 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    R. G. Tress , M. C. Sormani , P. Girichidis , S. C. O. Glover , R. S. Klessen , and et al. , ``Magnetic field morphology and evolution in the central molecular zone and its effect on gas dynamics,'' 691 , 303 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Reissl , S

    S. Reissl , S. Wolf , and R. Brauer , ``Radiative transfer with polaris. i. analysis of magnetic fields through synthetic dust continuum polarization measurements,'' 593 , 87 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Houde , J

    M. Houde , J. E. Vaillancourt , R. H. Hildebrand , S. Chitsazzadeh , and L. Kirby , ``Dispersion of magnetic fields in molecular clouds. ii.,'' 706 , 1504 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    evidence of spatial variation of the polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for cmb b-mode analysis,'' 599 , 51 (2017)

    Planck Collaboration , ``Planck intermediate results l. evidence of spatial variation of the polarized thermal dust spectral energy distribution and implications for cmb b-mode analysis,'' 599 , 51 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Molinari , E

    S. Molinari , E. Schisano , D. Elia , M. Pestalozzi , A. Traficante , S. Pezzuto , B. Swinyard , A. Noriega-Crespo , and et al. , ``Hi-gal, the herschel infrared galactic plane survey: photometric maps and compact source catalogues. first data release for inner milky way: +68 ...

    2016

  9. [17]

    Elia , M

    D. Elia , M. Merello , S. Molinari , E. Schisano , A. Zavagno , and et al. , ``The hi-gal compact source catalogue - ii. the 360 \,^ catalogue of clump physical properties,'' 504 , 2742 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Duarte-Cabral , D

    A. Duarte-Cabral , D. Colombo , J. S. Urquhart , A. Ginsburg , D. Russeil , and et. al. , ``The sedigism survey: molecular clouds in the inner galaxy,'' 500 , 3027 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Umemoto , T

    T. Umemoto , T. Minamidami , N. Kuno , S. Fujita , and et al. , ``Forest unbiased galactic plane imaging survey with the nobeyama 45 m telescope (fugin). i. project overview and initial results,'' 69 , 78 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Molinari , P

    S. Molinari , P. Schilke , C. Battersby , P. T. P. Ho , and et al. , ``Almagal i. the alma evolutionary study of high mass protocluster formation in the galaxy: Presentation of the survey and early results.,'' 696 , A149 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    L. M. Fissel , P. A. R. Ade , F. E. Angil\'e , P. Ashton , S. J. Benton , and et al. , ``Balloon-borne submillimeter polarimetry of the vela c molecular cloud: Systematic dependence of polarization fraction on column density and local polarization-angle dispersion,'' 824 , 134 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Davis , ``The strength of interstellar magnetic fields,'' Physical Review 81 , 890 (1951)

    L. Davis , ``The strength of interstellar magnetic fields,'' Physical Review 81 , 890 (1951)

    1951

  15. [23]

    Chandrasekhar and E

    S. Chandrasekhar and E. Fermi , ``Magnetic fields in spiral arms,'' 118 , 113 (1953)

    1953

  16. [24]

    D. L. Jow , R. Hill , D. Scott , J. D. Soler , P. G. Martin , M. J. Devlin , L. M. Fissel , and F. Poidevin , ``An application of an optimal statistic for characterizing relative orientations,'' 474 , 1018 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    J. D. Soler , ``Using herschel and planck observations to delineate the role of magnetic fields in molecular cloud structure,'' 629 , 96 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.