Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 37 references

Bounded geometry and $p$-harmonic functions under uniformization and hyperbolization

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single exponential weight transfers bounded geometry from Gromov hyperbolic spaces to their bounded uniformizations, preserving doubling, Poincaré inequalities, and the finite-energy Liouville property.

desk verdict A careful and valuable transfer principle for doubling measures and Poincaré inequalities under uniformization/hyperbolization, with the beta-threshold caveat real but honestly handled. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.04644 v1 pith:KZHSOSSD submitted 2019-08-13 math.MG math.AP

Anders Bjorn , Jana Bjorn , Nageswari Shanmugalingam This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.MGmath.AP MSC 53C2330F1030L1030L9931E05
keywords GromovhyperbolicspaceuniformizationhyperbolizationdoublingmeasurePoincaréinequalityp-harmonicfunctionfinite-energyLiouvilletheoremuniformdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper gives a measure-theoretic companion to the well-known uniformization and hyperbolization constructions for Gromov hyperbolic metric spaces. Its central result is that when a locally compact roughly starlike Gromov hyperbolic space carries a measure that is doubling and supports a p-Poincaré inequality on small balls, the exponentially weighted measure on the uniformized space is globally doubling and supports the global p-Poincaré inequality. The same recipe works in reverse: hyperbolizing a bounded uniform space turns a globally doubling measure and a global p-Poincaré inequality into uniformly local ones on the hyperbolicized space. This transfer is then used to characterize exactly when a Gromov hyperbolic space admits nonconstant p-harmonic functions of finite p-energy: precisely when the boundary of the uniformization contains two disjoint compact sets of positive p-capacity. A product construction for uniform spaces yields an 'indirect product' that makes pairs of Gromov hyperbolic spaces hyperbolic again.

What carries the argument

The central object is the uniformization metric dε(x,y)=inf∫$e^{{−εd(·,z0)}}$ds paired with the conformally weighted measure dμ_β=$e^{{−βd(·,z0)}}$dμ. SubWhitney balls in Xε, balls with radius at most half the distance to the boundary, are comparable to hyperbolic balls of controlled radius, so estimates for μβ can be read off from μ. Near the boundary, balls are decomposed into layers A_n={x:$e^{{−nr}}$≤dε(x)≤$e^{{1−n}}$r}; the local doubling constant C_d controls how many ambient balls of radius R0 cover each layer, while the factor $e^{{−nβ/ε}}$ makes the layer sum converge exactly when β>17 log C_d/(3R0). This yields the key comparability μβ(Bε(x,r))≃μβ(Bε(z,a0r)) with a Whitney ball, from which global doubling follows and, via a chain-of-balls argument, the global p-Poincaré inequality follows.

What would settle it

On the regular K-ary tree with the optimal local doubling constant C_d(R)≃K^R, compute the doubling ratio μβ(Bε(ξ,2r))/μβ(Bε(ξ,r)) for balls centred at a boundary point ξ as r→0, for some β strictly larger than (17/3)log K; if the ratio is unbounded, the global doubling conclusion of Theorem 1.1 fails for that space.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's main theorem is Theorem 1.1: if X is locally compact, roughly starlike, and Gromov δ-hyperbolic with measure μ doubling on balls of radius at most R0 with constant C_d, then for 0<ε≤ε0(δ) and β>17 log C_d/(3R0), the measure dμ_β=$e^{{−βd(·,z0)}}$dμ is globally doubling on Xε=(X,dε) and its completion X̄ε, where dε is the metric obtained by integrating the conformal density $e^{{−εd(·,z0)}}$ along curves; if μ supports a local p-Poincaré inequality, μβ supports a global one on both spaces. The hyperbolization counterpart, Theorem 1.2, asserts that dμ_α=$d_Ω^{{−α}}$dμ on a bounded uniform space is locally doubling and supports a local p-Poincaré inequality after passing to the quasihyperbolic metric. The paper then identifies the finite-energy Liouville theorem for p-harmonic functions—continuous functions minimizing the integral of the p-th power of their upper gradient—on X with the statement that the visual boundary of the uniformization carries two disjoint compact sets of positive p-capacity.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the requirement that the weight decay faster than the boundary layers can accumulate, namely β>17 log C_d/(3R0); if the local doubling constant is large or the local scale R0 is small, this forces a rapidly decaying weight that may give infinite mass near the boundary and defeat global doubling.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any locally compact roughly starlike Gromov hyperbolic space with a uniformly locally doubling measure supporting a local p-Poincaré inequality can be uniformized into a bounded space with global bounded geometry, so global analytic tools for doubling metric-measure spaces apply there.
  • The finite-energy Liouville theorem holds on X exactly when the p-capacity of the uniformized boundary is concentrated at a single point; two disjoint compact boundary sets of positive p-capacity are necessary and sufficient for a nonconstant p-harmonic function with finite p-energy.
  • The hyperbolization direction gives a uniformly local doubling property and a local p-Poincaré inequality on the quasihyperbolic metric space associated to any bounded uniform space with a globally doubling measure and a global Poincaré inequality.
  • The Cartesian product of two bounded uniform spaces, with the sum metric, is a uniform space; hyperbolizing this product produces an indirect product of two Gromov hyperbolic spaces that is again Gromov hyperbolic.
  • If a Borel subset of the boundary has Hausdorff dimension larger than (log C_d)/(εR0), it has positive p-capacity under the transformed measure, so the boundary-capacity criterion can be verified by Hausdorff dimension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to test whether the constant 17/3 in the threshold can be replaced by the optimal value suggested by the tree example, between log K and (17/3)log K; if so, Theorem 1.1 would cover more slowly decaying weights and hence a wider class of boundary geometries.
  • The paper transfers p-harmonicity only at the special parameter p=β/ε, but the upper-gradient identity underlying the proof suggests that the same exponential weight should also map quasiminimizers or variational p-capacity directly; this is not explicitly formulated in the paper.
  • Because the boundary Hausdorff dimension condition depends only on ε, C_d, and R0, the construction offers a way to engineer hyperbolic spaces with prescribed finite-energy p-harmonic behavior by designing the boundary dimension, which the paper does not pursue as a separate construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies, in the setting of metric measure spaces, how the Bonk–Heinonen–Koskela uniformization and hyperbolization transformations interact with measures. The main theorem (Theorem 1.1) shows that for a locally compact roughly starlike Gromov delta-hyperbolic space X with a measure mu that is doubling for balls of radii at most R0 and supports a local p-Poincare inequality, the weighted measure d(mu_beta) = e^{-beta d(.,z0)} d(mu) on the uniformization X_epsilon is globally doubling and supports a global p-Poincare inequality, on both X_epsilon and its completion, provided beta > 17 log C_d/(3R0). The converse hyperbolization statement is Theorem 1.2. Applications include a characterization of the failure of the finite-energy Liouville theorem for p-harmonic functions in terms of positive-capacity boundary sets (Theorem 10.5), and the construction of an indirect product of Gromov hyperbolic spaces (Section 8).

Significance. The result is significant for analysis on Gromov hyperbolic spaces: it provides a quantitative transfer of bounded geometry between the hyperbolic space and its uniformization, with an explicit, though acknowledged non-optimal, weight threshold. The threshold is certified to be necessary up to a constant by Example 4.4, and the proofs are detailed and internally consistent, with constants carefully tracked. The product result for uniform domains (Proposition 8.3) and the Liouville characterization are natural and nontrivial additions. The paper also gives a converse to the transfer (Remark 4.6), strengthening the claim that the local and global conditions are matched.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Definitions 9.6 and Lemma 9.9; Theorem 10.5] The statement of Lemma 9.9 says that Omega \ {a} is locally annularly quasiconvex around a point a in the boundary of Omega, but Definition 9.6 as written requires the center of annular quasiconvexity to belong to the metric space itself. In the proof of Theorem 10.5 the authors apply Lemma 9.7 with the open set X_bar_epsilon \ {a} and center a, which is not an element of this open set. Please clarify the intended interpretation (for example, ambient balls in the completion with curves contained in the punctured domain) or adjust the statements so that the application is formally justified.
  2. [Proposition 4.7] The displayed estimate N_n less than or similar to C_d^{14n/(3 epsilon R0)} is not an immediate consequence of Lemma 3.5(b) as written; a short derivation, or an explicit statement that a cruder exponent is being used, would help the reader verify the threshold beta_0 = 17 log C_d/(3R0).
  3. [Section 2, after (2.2)] The symbol sequence 'Y /greaterorsimilarZ' is corrupted and should read 'Y is greater than or similar to Z'.
  4. [Example 8.7] The argument for quasiisometric nonequivalence of the indirect products is informal; consider adding a precise reference or a short explanation for why the snowflaked boundary circle cannot be quasisymmetrically equivalent to a 2-dimensional region.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the uniformization measure transfer is derived from explicit estimates, and the β-threshold is a proven sufficient condition rather than a fitted input.

full rationale

The central claims are derived, not assumed. Theorem 1.1 is proved by explicit ball-inclusion estimates (Theorem 2.10), a boundary-layer summation (Proposition 4.7), and a global Poincaré-chain argument (Proposition 6.3). The threshold β > 17 log C_d/(3R_0) is obtained by requiring the series Σ (C_d^{17/3R_0})^{n/ε} e^{-nβ/ε} to converge; it is not a parameter fitted to the conclusion, and the paper explicitly flags it as non-optimal. The p-harmonic equivalence in Proposition 10.4 follows from the exact change-of-variables identity g_{u,ε}=g_u e^{εd(·,z_0)} and the energy identity (10.2), not from a definitional identification. Self-citations such as [8] and [12] are to published, externally checkable results used mainly in examples or as standard tools, and none of them supplies the load-bearing step of the main theorems. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no prediction is renamed as a fit. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to the claimed transfer results, and no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the Bonk-Heinonen-Koskela uniformization estimates, quoted as black boxes, plus standard nonlinear potential theory on complete doubling spaces supporting p-Poincare inequalities. The genuinely new free quantities are the weight exponent beta, the uniformization scale epsilon, and the hyperbolization weight alpha; none is fitted to data. No new empirical entities are introduced; the indirect product is a mathematical construction defined within the paper, not a postulated physical entity.

free parameters (3)
  • beta (weight exponent) = chosen > 17 log C_d/(3R_0)
    Exponent in d mu_beta = e^{-beta d(.,z0)} d mu; must exceed the threshold for the series in Proposition 4.7 to converge, enabling global doubling on X_epsilon.
  • epsilon (uniformization scale) = 0 < epsilon <= epsilon_0(delta)
    Scale of the uniformized metric d_epsilon; must stay below the Bonk-Heinonen-Koskela threshold to ensure X_epsilon is A-uniform.
  • alpha (hyperbolization weight) = any alpha > 0
    Exponent in d mu_alpha = d_Omega(.)^{-alpha} d mu for the quasihyperbolic metric; the hyperbolization results hold for all positive alpha.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bonk-Heinonen-Koskela uniformization of locally compact roughly starlike Gromov hyperbolic spaces: X_epsilon is A-uniform for epsilon <= epsilon_0(delta), with metric estimates (2.2), (2.3).
    Used throughout Sections 4 and 6 to compare d_epsilon balls with hyperbolic balls and to estimate boundary distances; quoted from [14], not proved here.
  • domain assumption Gehring-Hayman lemma and related estimates from [14] used to prove the uniformization Theorem 2.6.
    Referenced in the proof of Theorem 2.6; the authors only sketch the delta = 0 case and otherwise rely on [14].
  • standard math Choquet capacity, removability, and Kellogg property for Newtonian p-capacity on complete doubling spaces with global p-Poincare inequality, as in [5], [4], [10].
    Used in the proof of Theorem 10.5 to construct p-harmonic functions with prescribed boundary data and to remove zero-capacity boundary sets.
  • standard math Hopf-Rinow theorem ensures properness and geodesicity of locally compact roughly starlike Gromov hyperbolic spaces.
    Invoked in Section 2 to justify geodesic structure used in metric estimates throughout the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bounded geometry and $p$-harmonic functions under uniformization and hyperbolization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZHSOSSD

@misc{pith2026190804644,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bounded geometry and $p$-harmonic functions under uniformization and hyperbolization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZHSOSSD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.04644}
}
abstract

The uniformization and hyperbolization transformations formulated by Bonk, Heinonen and Koskela in \emph{"Uniformizing Gromov Hyperbolic Spaces"}, Ast\'erisque {\bf 270} (2001), dealt with geometric properties of metric spaces. In this paper we consider metric measure spaces and construct a parallel transformation of measures under the uniformization and hyperbolization procedures. We show that if a locally compact roughly starlike Gromov hyperbolic space is equipped with a measure that is uniformly locally doubling and supports a uniformly local $p$-Poincar\'e inequality, then the transformed measure is globally doubling and supports a global $p$-Poincar\'e inequality on the corresponding uniformized space. In the opposite direction, we show that such global properties on bounded locally compact uniform spaces yield similar uniformly local properties for the transformed measures on the corresponding hyperbolized spaces. We use the above results on uniformization of measures to characterize when a Gromov hyperbolic space, equipped with a uniformly locally doubling measure supporting a uniformly local $p$-Poincar\'e inequality, carries nonconstant globally defined $p$-harmonic functions with finite $p$-energy. We also study some geometric properties of Gromov hyperbolic and uniform spaces. While the Cartesian product of two Gromov hyperbolic spaces need not be Gromov hyperbolic, we construct an indirect product of such spaces that does result in a Gromov hyperbolic space. This is done by first showing that the Cartesian product of two bounded uniform domains is a uniform domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., Carleson-type estimates for p- harmonic functions and the conformal Martin boundary of John do mains in metric measure spaces, Michigan Math

    Aikawa, H. and Shanmugalingam, N., Carleson-type estimates for p- harmonic functions and the conformal Martin boundary of John do mains in metric measure spaces, Michigan Math. J. 53 (2005), 165–188. 21

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    and Tyson, J

    Bishop, C. and Tyson, J. T., Locally minimal sets for conformal dimension, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 26 (2001), 361–273. 29

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Bj¨orn, A., A weak Kellogg property for quasiminimizers, Comment. Math. Helv. 81 (2006), 809–825. 31

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Bj¨orn, A., Removable singularities for bounded p-harmonic and quasi(super)- harmonic functions on metric spaces, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 31 (2006), 71–95. 36 Bounded geometry and p-harmonic functions under uniformization and hyperboliza tion 39

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    and Bj¨orn, J., Nonlinear Potential Theory on Metric Spaces, EMS Tracts in Mathematics 17, European Math

    Bj¨orn, A. and Bj¨orn, J., Nonlinear Potential Theory on Metric Spaces, EMS Tracts in Mathematics 17, European Math. Soc., Z¨ urich, 2011. 5, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 36

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    and Bj¨orn, J., Local and semilocal Poincar´ e inequalities on metric spaces, J

    Bj¨orn, A. and Bj¨orn, J., Local and semilocal Poincar´ e inequalities on metric spaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. 119 (2018), 158–192. 17

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    and Bj¨orn, J., Poincar´ e inequalities and Newtonian Sobolev func- tions on noncomplete metric spaces, J

    Bj¨orn, A. and Bj¨orn, J., Poincar´ e inequalities and Newtonian Sobolev func- tions on noncomplete metric spaces, J. Differential Equations. 266 (2019), 44–69. 14

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., Geometric anal- ysis on Cantor sets and trees, J

    Bj¨orn, A., Bj¨orn, J., Gill, J. and Shanmugalingam, N., Geometric anal- ysis on Cantor sets and trees, J. Reine Angew. Math. 725 (2017), 63–114. 2, 4, 12

    work page 2017

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    and Lehrb¨ack, J., Pointwise and integrability esti- mates for p-harmonic Green functions in metric spaces, In preparation

    Bj¨orn, A., Bj ¨orn, J. and Lehrb¨ack, J., Pointwise and integrability esti- mates for p-harmonic Green functions in metric spaces, In preparation. 37

  2. [10]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., The Dirichlet problem for p-harmonic functions on metric spaces, J

    Bj¨orn, A., Bj ¨orn, J. and Shanmugalingam, N., The Dirichlet problem for p-harmonic functions on metric spaces, J. Reine Angew. Math. 556 (2003), 173–203. 36

    2003

  3. [11]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., Locally p-admissible mea- sures on R, Preprint, 2018

    Bj¨orn, A., Bj¨orn, J. and Shanmugalingam, N., Locally p-admissible mea- sures on R, Preprint, 2018. arXiv:1807.02174 38

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., Liouville’s theorem for p-harmonic functions and quasiminizers with finite energy, Preprint, 2018

    Bj¨orn, A., Bj ¨orn, J. and Shanmugalingam, N., Liouville’s theorem for p-harmonic functions and quasiminizers with finite energy, Preprint, 2018. arXiv:1809.07155 3, 32, 33, 38

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., Poincar´ e inequalities, uniform domains and extension properties for Newton–Sobolev functions in metric s paces, J

    Bj¨orn, J. and Shanmugalingam, N., Poincar´ e inequalities, uniform domains and extension properties for Newton–Sobolev functions in metric s paces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 332 (2007), 190–208. 19

    2007

  6. [14]

    and Koskela, P., Unifomizing Gromov Hyperbolic Spaces, Ast´ erisque270 (2001)

    Bonk, M., Heinonen, J. and Koskela, P., Unifomizing Gromov Hyperbolic Spaces, Ast´ erisque270 (2001). 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, 18, 19, 21, 24, 29

    2001

  7. [15]

    and Saksman, E., Sobolev spaces and hyperbolic fillings, J

    Bonk, M. and Saksman, E., Sobolev spaces and hyperbolic fillings, J. Reine Angew. Math 737 (2018), 161–187. 2

    2018

  8. [16]

    and Soto, T., Triebel–Lizorkin spaces on metric spaces via hyperbolic fillings, Indiana Univ

    Bonk, M., Saksman, E. and Soto, T., Triebel–Lizorkin spaces on metric spaces via hyperbolic fillings, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 67 (2018), 1625–1663. 2

    2018

  9. [17]

    Bridson, M and Haefliger, A., Metric Spaces of Non-positive Curvature, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 319, Springer, Berlin, 1999. 2, 4

    1999

  10. [18]

    and Xie, X., Metric space inversions, quasihyper- bolic distance, and uniform spaces, Indiana Univ

    Buckley, S., Herron, D. and Xie, X., Metric space inversions, quasihyper- bolic distance, and uniform spaces, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 57 (2008), 837–890. 2

    2008

  11. [19]

    and Schroeder, V., Elements of Asymptotic Geometry, EMS Monographs in Mathematics 3, European Math

    Buyalo, S. and Schroeder, V., Elements of Asymptotic Geometry, EMS Monographs in Mathematics 3, European Math. Soc., Z¨ urich, 2007.2

    2007

  12. [20]

    1441, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1990

    Coornaert, M., Delzant, T.and Papadopoulos, A.,G´ eom´ etrie et th´ eorie des groupes, Lecture Notes in Math. 1441, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1990. 2

    1990

  13. [21]

    248 (2018), 117–127

    DiMarco, C., Fractal curves and rugs of prescribed conformal dimension, Topology Appl. 248 (2018), 117–127. 29

    2018

  14. [22]

    Gehring, F. W. and Osgood, B. G., Uniform domains and the quasihyper- bolic metric, J. Anal. Math. 36 (1979), 50–74. 24

    1979

  15. [23]

    and de la Harpe, P., Espaces m´ etriques hyperboliques, inSur les groupes hyperboliques d’apr` es Mikhael Gromov(Bern, 1988 ), Progress in Math

    Ghys, ´E. and de la Harpe, P., Espaces m´ etriques hyperboliques, inSur les groupes hyperboliques d’apr` es Mikhael Gromov(Bern, 1988 ), Progress in Math. 83, pp. 27–45, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1990.2

    1988

  16. [24]

    Gromov, M., Hyperbolic groups, in Essays in Group Theory , Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 8, pp. 75–263, Springer, New York, 1987. 2

    1987

  17. [25]

    152, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1999.5

    Gromov, M., Metric Structures for Riemannian and Non-Riemannian Space s, Progress in Math. 152, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1999.5

    1999

  18. [26]

    Haj/suppress lasz, P.and Koskela, P., Sobolev met Poincar´ e, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 145:688 (2000). 16 40 Anders Bj¨ orn, Jana Bj¨ orn and Nageswari Shanmugalingam

    2000

  19. [27]

    Heinonen, J., Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces, Springer, New York, 2001. 21

    2001

  20. [28]

    and Martio, O., Nonlinear Potential Theory of Degenerate Elliptic Equations, 2nd ed., Dover, Mineola, NY, 2006

    Heinonen, J., Kilpel¨ainen, T. and Martio, O., Nonlinear Potential Theory of Degenerate Elliptic Equations, 2nd ed., Dover, Mineola, NY, 2006. 32

    2006

  21. [29]

    and Koskela, P., Quasiconformal maps in metric spaces with controlled geometry, Acta Math

    Heinonen, J. and Koskela, P., Quasiconformal maps in metric spaces with controlled geometry, Acta Math. 181 (1998), 1–61. 16, 19

    1998

  22. [30]

    and Tyson, J

    Heinonen, J., Koskela, P., Shanmugalingam, N. and Tyson, J. T., Sobolev Spaces on Metric Measure Spaces, New Mathematical Monographs 27, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2015. 16, 20, 29

    2015

  23. [31]

    and Xie, X., Uniformity from Gromov hyperbolicity, Illinois J

    Herron, D., Shanmugalingam, N. and Xie, X., Uniformity from Gromov hyperbolicity, Illinois J. Math. 52 (2008), 1065–1109. 2

    2008

  24. [32]

    Keith, S., Modulus and the Poincar´ e inequality on metric measure spaces, Math. Z. 245 (2003), 255–292. 16

    2003

  25. [33]

    and Shanmugalingam, N., Regularity of quasi-minimizers on metric spaces, Manuscripta Math

    Kinnunen, J. and Shanmugalingam, N., Regularity of quasi-minimizers on metric spaces, Manuscripta Math. 105 (2001), 401–423. 31

    2001

  26. [34]

    and MacManus, P., Quasiconformal mappings and Sobolev spaces, Studia Math

    Koskela, P. and MacManus, P., Quasiconformal mappings and Sobolev spaces, Studia Math. 131 (1998), 1–17. 16

    1998

  27. [35]

    Lehrb¨ack, J., Neighbourhood capacities, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 37 (2012), 35–51. 30

    2012

  28. [36]

    Shanmugalingam, N., Newtonian spaces: An extension of Sobolev spaces to metric measure spaces, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 16 (2000), 243–279. 29

    2000

  29. [37]

    Shanmugalingam, N., Harmonic functions on metric spaces, Illinois J. Math. 45 (2001), 1021–1050. 16, 36

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.