Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Outcome measurement error correction for survival analyses with multiple failure types: application to hearing loss studies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.10568 v1 pith:L4HWEY5M submitted 2023-06-18 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords hearingmeasurementanalyseserrorslossoutcomesself-reportedstudies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In epidemiological studies, participants' disease status is often collected through self-reported outcomes in place of formal medical tests due to budget constraints. However, self-reported outcomes are often subject to measurement errors, and may lead to biased estimates if used in statistical analyses. In this paper, we propose statistical methods to correct for outcome measurement errors in survival analyses with multiple failure types through a reweighting strategy. We also discuss asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators and derive their asymptotic variances. The work is motivated by Conservation of Hearing Study (CHEARS) which aims to evaluate risk factors for hearing loss in the Nurses' Health Studies II (NHS II). We apply the proposed method to adjust for the measurement errors in self-reported hearing outcomes; the analysis results suggest that tinnitus is positively associated with moderate hearing loss at both low or mid and high sound frequencies, while the effects between different frequencies are similar.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statistical methods for clustered competing risk data when the event types are only available in a training dataset

    stat.ME 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Clustered competing risks data with event types missing in the main study can be analyzed by weighting or imputing the missing types using classifier probabilities from a training dataset.

Pith tools