pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21432 · v1 · pith:L6BX5AL7new · submitted 2026-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Intraband and Interband Competition Drives Ultrafast Modulations of Indium Tin Oxide

Anthony C Harwood , Sean Z J Lim , T V Raziman , Yan Li , Joseph Stones , John W G Tisch , Simon A R Horsley , Stefano Vezzoli
show 2 more authors
John B Pendry Riccardo Sapienza
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords indium tin oxideultrafast dynamicsepsilon-near-zeroplasma frequencyinterband transitionstwo-temperature modelAuger scatteringoptical switching
0
0 comments X

The pith

Competing intraband heating and interband Auger scattering produce non-monotonic ultrafast changes in indium tin oxide's plasma frequency and damping at high fluences.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that intense laser pulses drive competing processes inside indium tin oxide: intraband heating of conduction electrons and a nonlinear interband process in which hot electrons scatter to promote carriers from the valence band. This competition creates the observed non-monotonic swings in reflectivity, transmissivity, and the retrieved complex Fresnel coefficients. A sympathetic reader would care because these materials are already used for rapid refractive-index control in time-varying metamaterials and optical switches, yet their high-fluence behavior had remained unexplained. The authors retrieve the time-dependent plasma frequency and damping coefficient directly from pump-probe data and demonstrate that an extended two-temperature model including the interband term reproduces the measured dynamics.

Core claim

At high fluences, Auger-type scattering of hot conduction electrons promotes valence band carriers, increasing the plasma frequency while accelerating hot-electron cooling and raising the damping coefficient. These dynamics are captured by an extended two-temperature model that incorporates the competing nonlinear interband process, explaining the anomalous non-monotonic behavior retrieved from pump-probe spectrograms.

What carries the argument

Extended two-temperature model incorporating a competing nonlinear interband Auger-type scattering process that promotes valence-band carriers into the conduction band.

If this is right

  • The modulation dynamics become fluence-tuneable through control of the relative strength of intraband and interband channels.
  • High-fluence operation can be used to accelerate hot-electron cooling and thereby shorten the recovery time of the optical response.
  • The results identify a concrete mechanism for engineering larger and faster refractive-index changes in epsilon-near-zero materials.
  • Time-varying photonic devices and all-optical switches can exploit the identified competition rather than treating high-fluence regimes as detrimental.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interband promotion mechanism may appear in other transparent conducting oxides when driven above a material-specific fluence threshold.
  • Device designs could deliberately operate in the regime where interband scattering dominates to achieve sign-reversed or oscillatory index modulation.
  • The competition offers a route to all-optical control of carrier density that does not rely solely on intraband heating.

Load-bearing premise

The optical gating technique retrieves the complex Fresnel coefficients directly and accurately from pump-probe spectrograms without significant reconstruction artifacts or unaccounted material assumptions.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the plasma frequency stops rising or the damping coefficient stops increasing at high fluences in a manner inconsistent with valence-band carrier promotion, or failure of the extended model to fit the retrieved dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21432 by Anthony C Harwood, John B Pendry, John W G Tisch, Joseph Stones, Riccardo Sapienza, Sean Z J Lim, Simon A R Horsley, Stefano Vezzoli, T V Raziman, Yan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a shows a measured pump-probe spectrogram taken in reflection at a pump fluence of 133 mJ/cm2 . The impact of the ultrafast modulation is clear in the spectro￾gram, which broadens and develops asymmetric structure about the zero delay during the fast rise, before shifting less and darkening throughout the slow decay. Using a standard blind FROG retrieval algorithm, we recover the spectrogram shown in Fig. … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transparent conducting oxides near their epsilon-near-zero frequency exhibit near-unity ultrafast modulations of the refractive index which have enabled the field of time-varying metamaterials, yet the underlying carrier dynamics at high driving fluences remain poorly understood. Here, we report ultrafast modulations in the reflectivity and transmissivity of indium tin oxide, and a non-monotonic oscillatory behavior. This is especially evident in the time evolution of the complex Fresnel coefficients retrieved directly from pump-probe spectrograms using a optical gating technique, GRUMPY FROG. The dynamics of the retrieved plasma frequency and damping coefficient are well captured by an extended two-temperature model incorporating a competing nonlinear interband process: at high fluences, Auger-type scattering of hot conduction electrons promotes valence band carriers, increasing the plasma frequency while accelerating hot-electron cooling and raising the damping coefficient. These results clarify the origin of anomalous high-fluence dynamics in indium tin oxide and identify a fluence-tuneable modulation dynamic with direct implications for ultrafast refractive index engineering in time-varying photonic devices and optical switching

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports ultrafast modulations of reflectivity and transmissivity in indium tin oxide near its epsilon-near-zero point. Using the GRUMPY FROG optical gating technique, complex Fresnel coefficients are retrieved directly from pump-probe spectrograms, revealing non-monotonic oscillatory behavior at high fluences. The time evolution of the retrieved plasma frequency and damping coefficient is stated to be captured by an extended two-temperature model that incorporates a competing nonlinear interband Auger-type process, in which hot conduction electrons promote valence-band carriers, thereby increasing the plasma frequency while accelerating cooling and raising damping.

Significance. If the GRUMPY FROG inversion is shown to be free of reconstruction artifacts and the extended model is demonstrated to be more than a parameter-tuned fit, the work would clarify the origin of anomalous high-fluence dynamics in transparent conducting oxides and provide a fluence-tunable mechanism relevant to time-varying metamaterials and optical switching. The direct retrieval of complex coefficients from spectrograms is a methodological strength that, if validated, would strengthen the central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (model comparison): the statement that the extended two-temperature model 'well captures' the retrieved plasma-frequency and damping dynamics is not supported by quantitative fit metrics, residuals, or explicit comparison against the standard two-temperature model without the interband term. The single additional free parameter (Auger-type interband scattering rate) risks circularity when it is adjusted to reproduce the observed non-monotonic evolution.
  2. [Methods (GRUMPY FROG retrieval procedure)] Methods (GRUMPY FROG retrieval procedure): the central claim presupposes that the optical gating technique accurately inverts pump-probe spectrograms into complex Fresnel coefficients without systematic biases, particularly at high fluences where non-monotonic behavior is reported. No validation against simulated data, known material responses, or error propagation analysis is described, leaving open the possibility that the subsequent model agreement reflects the inversion rather than intrinsic carrier dynamics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the fluence values and time ranges corresponding to the non-monotonic regime to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Discussion] A brief discussion of how the retrieved damping coefficient relates to known scattering mechanisms (e.g., electron-electron vs. electron-phonon) would improve physical interpretation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to provide quantitative model comparisons and validation of the retrieval procedure.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (model comparison): the statement that the extended two-temperature model 'well captures' the retrieved plasma-frequency and damping dynamics is not supported by quantitative fit metrics, residuals, or explicit comparison against the standard two-temperature model without the interband term. The single additional free parameter (Auger-type interband scattering rate) risks circularity when it is adjusted to reproduce the observed non-monotonic evolution.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative fit metrics and explicit model comparisons are needed to support the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a direct side-by-side comparison of the standard two-temperature model and the extended model, including residual plots and goodness-of-fit metrics such as reduced chi-squared values. The Auger-type interband term is physically motivated by established carrier-scattering mechanisms in the literature; we will demonstrate that the standard model fails to reproduce the non-monotonic evolution even after exhaustive parameter optimization, thereby showing that the additional term is required by the data rather than introduced to fit it. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (GRUMPY FROG retrieval procedure)] Methods (GRUMPY FROG retrieval procedure): the central claim presupposes that the optical gating technique accurately inverts pump-probe spectrograms into complex Fresnel coefficients without systematic biases, particularly at high fluences where non-monotonic behavior is reported. No validation against simulated data, known material responses, or error propagation analysis is described, leaving open the possibility that the subsequent model agreement reflects the inversion rather than intrinsic carrier dynamics.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit validation of the GRUMPY FROG inversion is required to exclude reconstruction artifacts. The revised manuscript will include a new subsection (or supplementary material) presenting validation on simulated pump-probe spectrograms generated from known complex Fresnel coefficients, together with an error-propagation analysis. These additions will confirm that the retrieved non-monotonic dynamics at high fluence are intrinsic to the material response. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Extended two-temperature model agreement achieved by tuning interband parameters to retrieved dynamics

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "The dynamics of the retrieved plasma frequency and damping coefficient are well captured by an extended two-temperature model incorporating a competing nonlinear interband process: at high fluences, Auger-type scattering of hot conduction electrons promotes valence band carriers, increasing the plasma frequency while accelerating hot-electron cooling and raising the damping coefficient."

    The model is extended precisely by adding the interband Auger process whose rate and fluence threshold are adjusted until the simulated plasma-frequency rise and damping increase match the GRUMPY-FROG-retrieved time traces; the 'capture' is therefore the result of the fit itself rather than a parameter-free prediction.

full rationale

The paper retrieves plasma frequency and damping via GRUMPY FROG, then states that an extended two-temperature model with an added Auger-type interband process captures their time evolution. This capture is accomplished by fitting the strength and onset of the nonlinear interband term to the same retrieved curves, so the reported agreement is a fit rather than an independent derivation or prediction from first principles. No self-citation chain or definitional loop is evident in the provided text, but the central explanatory claim reduces to parameter adjustment on the target data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available so ledger is inferred from described model extension; full parameters and assumptions would appear in the methods and results sections of the complete manuscript.

free parameters (1)
  • Auger-type interband scattering rate
    Nonlinear coefficient introduced to capture promotion of valence-band carriers at high fluences and to match observed plasma-frequency increase.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The standard two-temperature model can be extended with a competing nonlinear interband term that dominates at high fluences.
    Invoked to explain the non-monotonic dynamics and the simultaneous rise in plasma frequency and damping.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1425 out tokens · 52512 ms · 2026-05-21T03:03:01.655555+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Additionally, sub-picosecond modulations of media have been used as a broadband gate for measuring femtosecond optical pulses [40, 41]

    and ultrafast dynamics of media have been inferred by measuring the change of a pulse scattered by a dy- namic medium [38, 39]. Additionally, sub-picosecond modulations of media have been used as a broadband gate for measuring femtosecond optical pulses [40, 41]. However, in these scenarios, the extracted gate is a purely a b c FIG. 2.GRUMPY FROG retrieva...

    work page doi:10.14469/hpc/2232

  2. [2]

    Galiffi, R

    E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Al` u, and J. B. Pendry, Photonics of time-varying media, Advanced Photonics4, 014002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Engheta, Four-dimensional optics using time-varying metamaterials, Science379, 1190 (2023)

    N. Engheta, Four-dimensional optics using time-varying metamaterials, Science379, 1190 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Alam, I. De Leon, and R. W. Boyd, Large optical nonlinearity of indium tin oxide in its epsilon-near-zero region, Science352, 795 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Caspani, R

    L. Caspani, R. P. M. Kaipurath, M. Clerici, M. Ferrera, T. Roger, J. Kim, N. Kinsey, M. Pietrzyk, A. Di Falco, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, and D. Faccio, Enhanced Nonlinear Refractive Index in$\ensuremath{\epsilon}$- Near-Zero Materials, Physical Review Letters116, 233901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Kinsey, C

    N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, J. Kim, M. Ferrera, V. M. Sha- laev, and A. Boltasseva, Epsilon-near-zero Al-doped ZnO for ultrafast switching at telecom wavelengths, Optica2, 616 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Capretti, Y

    A. Capretti, Y. Wang, N. Engheta, and L. D. Negro, Enhanced third-harmonic generation in Si-compatible epsilon-near-zero indium tin oxide nanolayers, Optics Letters40, 1500 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Reshef, E

    O. Reshef, E. Giese, M. Z. Alam, I. D. Leon, J. Upham, and R. W. Boyd, Beyond the perturbative description of the nonlinear optical response of low-index materials, Optics Letters42, 3225 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    P. Guo, R. D. Schaller, L. E. Ocola, B. T. Diroll, J. B. Ketterson, and R. P. H. Chang, Large optical nonlinear- ity of ITO nanorods for sub-picosecond all-optical mod- ulation of the full-visible spectrum, Nature Communica- tions7, 12892 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Clerici, N

    M. Clerici, N. Kinsey, C. DeVault, J. Kim, E. G. Carnemolla, L. Caspani, A. Shaltout, D. Faccio, V. Sha- laev, A. Boltasseva, and M. Ferrera, Controlling hy- brid nonlinearities in transparent conducting oxides via two-colour excitation, Nature Communications8, 15829 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Lustig, O

    E. Lustig, O. Segal, S. Saha, E. Bordo, S. N. Chowdhury, Y. Sharabi, A. Fleischer, A. Boltasseva, O. Cohen, V. M. Shalaev, and M. Segev, Time-refraction optics with single cycle modulation, Nanophotonics12, 2221 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Y. Zhou, M. Z. Alam, M. Karimi, J. Upham, O. Reshef, C. Liu, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, Broadband fre- quency translation through time refraction in an epsilon- near-zero material, Nature Communications11, 2180 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    C. Liu, M. Z. Alam, K. Pang, K. Manukyan, J. R. Hen- drickson, E. M. Smith, Y. Zhou, O. Reshef, H. Song, R. Zhang, H. Song, F. Alishahi, A. Fallahpour, A. Al- maiman, R. W. Boyd, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, Tun- able Doppler shift using a time-varying epsilon-near-zero thin film near 1550 nm, Optics Letters46, 3444 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Vaddi, T.-L

    Y. Vaddi, T.-L. Lim, Y. Zhou, M. Karimi, S. Van- gala, J. Upham, J. R. Hendrickson, R. W. Boyd, and M. Z. Alam, Parametric Amplification of Optical Pulses through Synthetic Motion in a Time-Varying Medium, Nano Letters 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c05821 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c05821 2026

  15. [15]

    A. C. Harwood, S. Vezzoli, T. V. Raziman, C. Hooper, R. Tirole, F. Wu, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, S. a. R. Horsley, and R. Sapienza, Space-time optical diffraction from synthetic motion, Nature Communications16, 5147 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Galiffi, A

    E. Galiffi, A. C. Harwood, S. Vezzoli, R. Tirole, A. Al` u, and R. Sapienza, Optical coherent perfect absorption and amplification in a time-varying medium, Nature Photon- ics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  17. [17]

    Jaffray, S

    W. Jaffray, S. Stengel, A. Boltasseva, V. M. Shalaev, M. A. Vincenti, D. de Ceglia, M. Scalora, C. Rizza, and M. Ferrera, All-optical polarization control in time- varying low-index films via plasma symmetry breaking, Nature Photonics , 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    J. Bohn, T. S. Luk, C. Tollerton, S. W. Hutchings, I. Brener, S. Horsley, W. L. Barnes, and E. Hendry, All- optical switching of an epsilon-near-zero plasmon reso- nance in indium tin oxide, Nature Communications12, 1017 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [20]

    Secondo, J

    R. Secondo, J. Khurgin, and N. Kinsey, Absorptive loss and band non-parabolicity as a physical origin of large nonlinearity in epsilon-near-zero materials, Optical Ma- terials Express10, 1545 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    Gurung, S

    S. Gurung, S. Bej, Q. Dang, A. Sahoo, A. Anopchenko, Z. Yi, A. V. Sokolov, A. Marini, and H. W. H. Lee, Con- trol of ultrafast hot electron dynamics in epsilon-near- zero conductive oxide thin films, Science Advances11, eadu8850 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [22]

    Nonperturbative Nonlin- earities

    J. B. Khurgin and N. Kinsey, “Nonperturbative Nonlin- earities”: Perhaps Less than Meets the Eye, ACS Pho- tonics11, 2874 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [23]

    Li, Ultrafast Switching of Optical Properties in a Doped Semiconductor by Intense Femtosecond Laser Pulses, in press https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-026- 02346-x (2026)

    Y. Li, Ultrafast Switching of Optical Properties in a Doped Semiconductor by Intense Femtosecond Laser Pulses, in press https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-026- 02346-x (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-026- 2026

  23. [24]

    I.-W. Un, S. Sarkar, and Y. Sivan, Electronic-Based Model of the Optical Nonlinearity of Low-Electron- Density Drude Materials, Physical Review Applied19, 044043 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [25]

    H. Wang, K. Du, R. Liu, X. Dai, W. Zhang, S. J. Chua, and T. Mei, Role of hot electron scattering in epsilon- near-zero optical nonlinearity, Nanophotonics9, 4287 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [26]

    E. E. Narimanov, Ultrafast Optical Modulation by Vir- tual Interband Transitions, ACS Photonics12, 402 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [27]

    J. I. Choi, V. Mkhitaryan, C. Fruhling, J. B. Khurgin, A. V. Kildishev, V. M. Shalaev, and A. Boltasseva, Path- way to Optical-Cycle Dynamic Photonics: Extreme Elec- 9 tron Temperatures in Transparent Conducting Oxides (2025), arXiv:2512.24641 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    Un, Quantum-optical theory of the few- femtosecond nonlinear optical response of Drude metals with a nonparabolic conduction band, Physical Review B113, 10.1103/9rs8-8zh8 (2026)

    I.-W. Un, Quantum-optical theory of the few- femtosecond nonlinear optical response of Drude metals with a nonparabolic conduction band, Physical Review B113, 10.1103/9rs8-8zh8 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1103/9rs8-8zh8 2026

  28. [29]

    I.-W. Un, N. Harcavi, and Y. Sivan, Optical Nonlinearity of Transparent Conducting Oxides: More Metallic than Realized, ACS Photonics12, 1718 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [30]

    Guizzardi, S

    M. Guizzardi, S. Bonfadini, L. Moscardi, I. Kriegel, F. Scotognella, and L. Criante, Large scale indium tin oxide (ITO) one dimensional gratings for ultrafast sig- nal modulation in the visible spectral region, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics22, 6881 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [31]

    Tirole, E

    R. Tirole, E. Galiffi, J. Dranczewski, T. Attavar, B. Tilmann, Y.-T. Wang, P. A. Huidobro, A. Al´ u, J. B. Pendry, S. A. Maier, S. Vezzoli, and R. Sapienza, Saturable Time-Varying Mirror Based on an Epsilon- Near-Zero Material, Physical Review Applied18, 054067 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [32]

    J. Paul, M. Miscuglio, Y. Gui, V. J. Sorger, and J. K. Wahlstrand, Two-beam coupling by a hot electron non- linearity, Optics Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 2, pp. 428-431 10.1364/OL.413649 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.413649 2021

  32. [33]

    Trebino, K

    R. Trebino, K. W. DeLong, D. N. Fittinghoff, J. N. Sweetser, M. A. Krumb¨ ugel, B. A. Richman, and D. J. Kane, Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time- frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gat- ing, Review of Scientific Instruments68, 3277 (1997)

    work page 1997

  33. [34]

    K. W. DeLong, C. L. Ladera, R. Trebino, B. Kohler, and K. R. Wilson, Ultrashort-pulse measurement using non- instantaneous nonlinearities: Raman effects in frequency- resolved optical gating, Optics Letters20, 486 (1995)

    work page 1995

  34. [35]

    K. W. DeLong and R. Trebino, Improved ultrashort pulse-retrieval algorithm for frequency-resolved optical gating, Journal of the Optical Society of America A11, 2429 (1994)

    work page 1994

  35. [36]

    Jafari, T

    R. Jafari, T. Jones, and R. Trebino, 100% reliable algo- rithm for second-harmonic-generation frequency-resolved optical gating, Optics Express27, 2112 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [37]

    T. C. Wong, M. Rhodes, and R. Trebino, Single-shot measurement of the complete temporal intensity and phase of supercontinuum, Optica1, 119 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [38]

    S. A. R. Horsley, E. Galiffi, and Y.-T. Wang, Eigenpulses of Dispersive Time-Varying Media, Physical Review Let- ters130, 203803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [39]

    Jones, W

    T. Jones, W. K. Peters, A. Efimov, D. Yarotski, R. Tre- bino, and P. Bowlan, Measuring an ultrashort, ultraviolet pulse in a slowly responding, absorbing medium, Optics Express29, 11394 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    Rodriguez, C

    G. Rodriguez, C. Siders, C. Guo, and A. Taylor, Coherent ultrafast MI-FROG spectroscopy of optical field ioniza- tion in molecular H/sub 2/, N/sub 2/, and O/sub 2/, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 7, 579 (2001)

    work page 2001

  40. [41]

    Leblanc, P

    A. Leblanc, P. Lassonde, S. Petit, J.-C. Delagnes, E. Had- dad, G. Ernotte, M. R. Bionta, V. Gruson, B. E. Schmidt, H. Ibrahim, E. Cormier, and F. L´ egar´ e, Phase-matching- free pulse retrieval based on transient absorption in solids, Optics Express27, 28998 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [42]

    Cilento, C

    F. Cilento, C. Giannetti, G. Ferrini, S. Dal Conte, T. Sala, G. Coslovich, M. Rini, A. Cavalleri, and F. Parmigiani, Ultrafast insulator-to-metal phase tran- sition as a switch to measure the spectrogram of a su- percontinuum light pulse, Applied Physics Letters96, 021102 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [43]

    K. W. DeLong, R. Trebino, J. Hunter, and W. E. White, Frequency-resolved optical gating with the use of second- harmonic generation, JOSA B11, 2206 (1994)

    work page 1994

  43. [44]

    Z. Wang, E. Zeek, R. Trebino, and P. Kvam, Deter- mining error bars in measurements of ultrashort laser pulses, JOSA B, Vol. 20, Issue 11, pp. 2400-2405 10.1364/JOSAB.20.002400 (2003)

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.20.002400 2003

  44. [45]

    Bresci, M

    A. Bresci, M. Guizzardi, C. M. Valensise, F. Marangi, F. Scotognella, G. Cerullo, and D. Polli, Removal of cross-phase modulation artifacts in ultrafast pump–probe dynamics by deep learning, APL Photonics6, 076104 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [46]

    D. A. Zimin, R. Sen, M. Qasim, J. Sjakste, and V. S. Yakovlev, Plasmascopy of ultrafast hot charges in solids (2025), arXiv:2512.05582 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [47]

    Brida, A

    D. Brida, A. Tomadin, C. Manzoni, Y. J. Kim, A. Lom- bardo, S. Milana, R. R. Nair, K. S. Novoselov, A. C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, and M. Polini, Ultrafast collinear scattering and carrier multiplication in graphene, Nature Communications4, 1987 (2013)

    work page 1987

  47. [48]

    E. O. Kane, Band structure of indium antimonide, Jour- nal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids1, 249 (1957)

    work page 1957

  48. [49]

    O. N. Mryasov and A. J. Freeman, Electronic band struc- ture of indium tin oxide and criteria for transparent con- ducting behavior, Physical Review B64, 233111 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [50]

    J. E. Medvedeva and C. L. Hettiarachchi, Tuning the properties of complex transparent conducting oxides: Role of crystal symmetry, chemical composition, and car- rier generation, Physical Review B81, 125116 (2010)

    work page 2010

  50. [51]

    A. Y. Bykov, J. Deng, G. Li, and A. V. Zayats, Time-Dependent Ultrafast Quadratic Nonlinearity in an Epsilon-Near-Zero Platform, Nano Letters24, 3744 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    Y. Yang, K. Kelley, E. Sachet, S. Campione, T. S. Luk, J.-P. Maria, M. B. Sinclair, and I. Brener, Femtosecond optical polarization switching using a cadmium oxide- based perfect absorber, Nature Photonics11, 390 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [53]

    N. Karl, P. P. Vabishchevich, M. R. Shcherbakov, S. Liu, M. B. Sinclair, G. Shvets, and I. Brener, Frequency con- version in a time-variant dielectric metasurface, Nano Letters20, 7052 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [54]

    M. R. Shcherbakov, K. Werner, Z. Fan, N. Talisa, E. Chowdhury, and G. Shvets, Photon acceleration and tunable broadband harmonics generation in nonlinear time-dependent metasurfaces, Nature Communications 10, 1345 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [55]

    Grinblat, M

    G. Grinblat, M. P. Nielsen, P. Dichtl, Y. Li, R. F. Oulton, and S. A. Maier, Ultrafast sub–30-fs all-optical switch- ing based on gallium phosphide, Science Advances5, eaaw3262 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [56]

    Brahms, L

    C. Brahms, L. Zhang, X. Shen, U. Bhattacharya, M. Re- casens, J. Osmond, T. Grass, R. W. Chhajlany, K. A. Hallman, R. F. Haglund, S. T. Pantelides, M. Lewen- stein, J. C. Travers, and A. S. Johnson, Decoupled few- femtosecond phase transitions in vanadium dioxide, Na- ture Communications16, 3714 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [57]

    Effects due to generation of negative frequencies during temporal diffraction,

    E. Hendry, C. M. Hooper, W. P. Wardley, and S. A. R. Horsley, Effects due to generation of negative frequen- cies during temporal diffraction (2025), arXiv:2507.03491 [physics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [58]

    R. M. Kaipurath, M. Pietrzyk, L. Caspani, T. Roger, M. Clerici, C. Rizza, A. Ciattoni, A. Di Falco, and D. Fac- 10 cio, Optically induced metal-to-dielectric transition in Epsilon-Near-Zero metamaterials, Scientific Reports6, 27700 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [59]

    J. Bohn, T. S. Luk, S. Horsley, and E. Hendry, Spatiotem- poral refraction of light in an epsilon-near-zero indium tin oxide layer: Frequency shifting effects arising from interfaces, Optica8, 1532 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [60]

    Tirole, S

    R. Tirole, S. Vezzoli, E. Galiffi, I. Robertson, D. Maurice, B. Tilmann, S. A. Maier, J. B. Pendry, and R. Sapienza, Double-slit time diffraction at optical frequencies, Nature Physics , 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [61]

    Lyubarov, Y

    M. Lyubarov, Y. Lumer, A. Dikopoltsev, E. Lustig, Y. Sharabi, and M. Segev, Amplified emission and las- ing in photonic time crystals, Science377, 425 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [62]

    X. Wang, P. Garg, M. S. Mirmoosa, A. G. Lamprianidis, C. Rockstuhl, and V. S. Asadchy, Expanding momentum bandgaps in photonic time crystals through resonances, Nature Photonics19, 149 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [63]

    S. Saha, O. Segal, C. Fruhling, E. Lustig, M. Segev, A. Boltasseva, and V. M. Shalaev, Photonic time crys- tals: a materials perspective [Invited], Optics Express31, 8267 (2023)

    work page 2023