Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Motion Magnification Algorithms for Video-Based Breathing Monitoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.16046 v1 pith:L6M2FCIC submitted 2022-11-29 eess.IV

classification eess.IV
keywords algorithmsestimationmotionbreathingmagnificationmethodssignalsvideo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present two video processing techniques for contact-less estimation of the Respiratory Rate (RR) of framed subjects. Due to the modest extent of movements related to respiration in both infants and adults, specific algorithms to efficiently detect breathing are needed. For this reason, motion-related variations in video signals are exploited to identify respiration of the monitored patient and simultaneously estimate the RR over time. Our estimation methods rely on two motion magnification algorithms that are exploited to enhance the subtle respiration-related movements. In particular, amplitude- and phase-based algorithms for motion magnification are considered to extract reliable motion signals. The proposed estimation systems perform both spatial decomposition of the video frames combined with proper temporal filtering to extract breathing information. After periodic (or quasi-periodic) respiratory signals are extracted and jointly analysed, we apply the Maximum Likelihood (ML) criterion to estimate the fundamental frequency, corresponding to the RR. The performance of the presented methods is first assessed by comparison with reference data. Videos framing different subjects, i.e., newborns and adults, are tested. Finally, the RR estimation accuracy of both methods is measured in terms of normalized Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools