Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Zellige: Moldable Sequence Placement for Mixed Image-Video DiT Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.01150 v1 pith:L7DEPYNX submitted 2026-08-02 cs.DC

classification cs.DC
keywords sequencesequenceszelligegpusparallelismplacementtrainingacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

High-quality video generation requires training Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) jointly on image and video data, posing a mixed-length sequence training problem across GPUs. Existing systems rely on data parallelism (DP), context parallelism (CP), or their combination; we model these designs as disjoint-group placement and prove that they face a fundamental tradeoff between inter-group load imbalance and intra-group communication redundancy. We present Zellige, a moldable sequence placement system that jointly selects each sequence's parallelism configuration and participating ranks. Zellige consists of three components: a hardware profiler that estimates the execution time and memory consumption of candidate placements, a two-stage planner that balances compute-heavy anchor sequences and packs lighter filler sequences into the remaining capacity, and a coalesced attention engine that efficiently executes whole sequences alongside distributed-attention shards. Across 21 plans, the hardware profile predicts step makespan and peak allocated memory with mean absolute percentage errors of $3.4%$ and $1.5%$, respectively. The two-stage planner solves each batch in 33--119 ms, significantly faster than a joint-placement reference that optimizes all sequences together, while their modeled makespans differ by at most $0.32%$. In end-to-end evaluations, Zellige outperforms KnapFormer by $1.12$--$1.48\times$ on 16 A800 GPUs and $1.27$--$1.54\times$ on 32 A6000 GPUs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools