Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Spectroscopy and Ground-State Transfer of Ultracold Bosonic $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs Molecules

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ultracold bosonic $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs molecules are created in their rovibrational ground state by STIRAP through an exceptionally narrow intermediate state, with up to 3500 trapped molecules at about 1 µK and one-way transfer efficiencies…

desk verdict First ultracold ground-state KCs molecules, with careful spectroscopy and a convincing STIRAP demonstration; the central claim holds, and the paper deserves proper refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.21207 v2 pith:LC6GWUSX submitted 2025-05-27 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-ph

Krzysztof P. Zamarski , Charly Beulenkamp , Yi Zeng , Manuele Landini , Hanns-Christoph Nägerl This is my paper
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-ph
keywords ultracoldmolecules39K133CsrovibrationalgroundstateSTIRAPFeshbachdipolarquantumgasestwo-bodylossesmolecularspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first production of ultracold $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs molecules in their rovibrational ground state, assembled from Feshbach molecules by stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP). The authors identify a usable intermediate level in the spin-orbit-coupled $A^1\Sigma_0$--$b^3\Pi_\Omega$ complex: the $v'=75$, $J'=1$ state, whose $2\pi\times 80(6)$ kHz natural linewidth is the narrowest used for STIRAP in bialkalis to date. With this pathway they create trapped samples of up to 3500 molecules at temperatures around 1 µK, with one-way transfer efficiencies up to 71%. They also measure the ground-state rotational constant, a ground-state polarizability ratio of 0.93(4) relative to the Feshbach molecules at 1064 nm, and a two-body loss coefficient of $8(2)(2)\times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{cm^3\,s^{-1}}$, larger than the predicted universal rate. A sympathetic reader would care because KCs adds a chemically stable, strongly polar bosonic molecule with a large dynamic polarizability, giving a new platform for dipolar quantum-gas experiments and a new test case for the near-universal loss mechanisms seen in other species.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spin-orbit-coupled $A^1\Sigma_0$--$b^3\Pi_\Omega$ excited-state complex of KCs, used as the middle leg of a two-photon STIRAP ladder. The argument selects $v'=75$, $J'=1$, $M_{J'}=-1$: the state has almost pure $b^3\Pi_1$ ($\Omega=1$) character, giving resolvable hyperfine structure, while a small $A^1\Sigma_0$ admixture makes the transition to the singlet $X^1\Sigma^+$ ground state allowed. Its measured natural linewidth $2\pi\times 80(6)$ kHz is the narrowest reported for a bialkali STIRAP intermediate state, so adiabatic transfer can proceed with peak Rabi frequencies around $2\pi\times 350$ kHz. The transfer is modeled by a four-level master equation (Feshbach state, excited state, ground state, loss channel) that reproduces the EIT spectrum and the STIRAP population dynamics with only the initial molecule number as a free parameter.

What would settle it

Measure the $v'=75$ transition frequencies and hyperfine splittings with an independent method, such as a frequency comb referenced to an optical clock or a separate coupled-channels calculation, and compare them with the unpublished predicted values; a discrepancy beyond the quoted 0.1 MHz-level agreement would mean the assigned state is not the one addressed, and the STIRAP efficiency claims would need to be reinterpreted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs molecules can be transferred coherently from weakly bound Feshbach molecules to the absolute rovibrational ground state $X^1\Sigma^+$, $v''=0$ via an exceptionally narrow electronically excited state, and that this has now been done for the first time in the ultracold regime. The authors establish the pathway by one- and two-photon loss spectroscopy: they resolve four hyperfine components of the $v'=75$ level of the $A^1\Sigma_0$--$b^3\Pi_\Omega$ complex, select the $M_{J'}=-1$ component for its strong coupling to the ground state, measure the $J''=0$ and $J''=2$ rotational levels of $v''=0$, and use electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) to extract a pump transition dipole moment of $4.7(4)\times 10^{-4}\,e a_0$, consistent with prediction. A counterintuitive STIRAP pulse sequence then converts Feshbach molecules to ground-state molecules with one-way efficiency up to 71%, yielding 3500 trapped molecules at about 1 µK without observable heating. The lifetime of the sample is governed by two-body loss at $8(2)(2)\times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{cm^3\,s^{-1}}$, close to but above the predicted universal rate, and the authors argue this makes KCs a useful probe of the photoinduced loss mechanisms that limit other chemically stable molecules.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the two excited states that form the transfer route comes from unpublished theoretical predictions quoted as a private communication; if that identification is wrong, the laser pulses are not doing what the paper claims.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Samples of up to 3500 ground-state $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs molecules at about 1 µK can be produced and held in a 1064-nm optical trap.
  • The $2\pi\times 80(6)$ kHz natural linewidth of the intermediate state allows efficient STIRAP at lower Rabi frequencies than in other bialkali experiments, reducing laser-power demands.
  • The measured ground-state to Feshbach polarizability ratio of 0.93(4) at 1064 nm means the transfer does not excite strong sample oscillations.
  • The two-body loss coefficient of $8(2)(2)\times 10^{-10}\,\mathrm{cm^3\,s^{-1}}$, exceeding the predicted universal rate, makes KCs a new test case for photoinduced loss mechanisms in chemically stable molecules.
  • The hyperfine-resolved spectroscopy yields a ground-state rotational constant $B_0=2\pi\times 912.68(18)$ MHz, close to the predicted equilibrium value and useful for further molecular-structure studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same spectroscopic pathway extends to the fermionic isotopologue $^{40}$K$^{133}$Cs, KCs could provide both bosonic and fermionic dipolar species from one molecular platform, a step the paper motivates but does not demonstrate.
  • The near-unity polarizability ratio at 1064 nm, combined with the large dynamic polarizability, suggests KCs is well suited for direct ground-state transfer inside deep optical lattices, which the authors do not report.
  • The unusually narrow intermediate state may allow coherent two-photon transfer with reduced photon-scattering heating, and could enable high-fidelity coherent control of rotational states at lower intensities.
  • If the observed two-body loss is photoinduced rather than universal, the paper's data predict that KCs losses should be suppressible by microwave shielding or two-dimensional confinement, in analogy with RbCs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the production of ultracold bosonic 39K133Cs molecules in the rovibrational ground state, starting from weakly bound Feshbach molecules in a 1064-nm optical dipole trap. The authors use loss spectroscopy to identify two vibrational levels of the spin-orbit-coupled A1Σ0-b3ΠΩ manifold, characterize the hyperfine-resolved v'=75 state, and use two-photon spectroscopy to locate the X1Σ+, v''=0, J''=0 and J''=2 states. They then implement STIRAP with a counterintuitive pulse sequence, reaching up to ~3500 ground-state molecules at ~1 µK with a quoted one-way efficiency of ~71%. The ground-state identity is supported by the measured J''=0–2 splitting (5.476 GHz, giving B0=912.68(18) MHz versus the predicted Be=914.014(21) MHz), by the ground-to-Feshbach polarizability ratio 0.93(4), by an EIT-derived transition dipole moment of 4.7(4)×10^-4 ea0 matching the predicted 4.75, and by a master-equation simulation of the STIRAP sequence in which only the initial molecule number is free. The lifetime of the trapped ground-state molecules is limited by two-body loss with a coefficient of 8(2)sys(2)stat×10^-10 cm3/s.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a significant advance: it adds a new bialkali species — one with both bosonic and fermionic isotopes, a 1.9 D permanent dipole moment, and a large dynamic polarizability at 1064 nm — to the short list of ultracold, chemically stable ground-state polar molecules. The paper's strengths are its multiple independent cross-checks of the ground-state assignment and the fact that the STIRAP data are reproduced by a master-equation model with only one free parameter. The authors also make their data publicly available on Zenodo. The main caveat is that the excited-state labeling and predicted transition dipole moments rely on unpublished theory communicated privately, which limits reproducibility of the spectroscopic interpretation; however, this does not affect the independent evidence for the rovibrational ground-state product.

major comments (2)
  1. [Loss spectroscopy / Table I] The assignment of the v'=74 and v'=75 levels to the A1Σ0-b3ΠΩ manifold, and the predicted transition dipole moments used in Tables I and II and in the EIT comparison, rest entirely on private communication [52]. Because the EIT-derived TDM (4.7(4) versus 4.75×10^-4 ea0) is presented as confirmation, the underlying calculated energies, spin-orbit/coupling matrix elements, and TDMs should be made available in the Supplemental Material or in a citable preprint. Without this, the central spectroscopic pathway is not independently reproducible.
  2. [STIRAP / Fig. 4] The one-way transfer efficiency is quoted as 'around 71%' with no uncertainty, and the text says it comes from 'the ratio of the final and initial numbers' even though the sequence includes both forward and reverse STIRAP. Please state explicitly how the one-way efficiency is derived from the measured round-trip survival (for example, as its square root), and provide an error estimate propagated from the molecule-number counts.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption of Fig. 2 refers to 'linewidths and Rabi frequencies presented in Table I', but these quantities are listed in Table II; Table I contains state compositions and transition energies.
  2. [Fig. 5 / abstract] The measured two-body loss coefficient, 8(2)sys(2)stat×10^-10 cm3/s, is about three times the predicted universal value of 2.8×10^-10; the phrase 'near-universal' in the abstract may overstate the agreement and should be qualified.
  3. [Fig. 3(b)] The paper reports three hyperfine levels in the J''=2 manifold without assignment; this limitation affects the quoted rotational-constant uncertainty, so it should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in the figure caption.
  4. [Supplemental Material / main text] There are minor typographical issues: the heading 'T rap frequencies' in the Supplemental Material should be 'Trap frequencies', and 'muti-mode laser diode' in the main text should be 'multimode laser diode'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: measured quantities are checked against independent calculations, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is experimental rather than self-referential: line positions, natural linewidths, Rabi frequencies, the ground-state rotational splitting, the polarizability ratio, and the two-body loss coefficient are all measured from the data and compared with external predictions (refs. 47, 52, 59, 62). None of the comparisons is obtained by construction from a fitted parameter: the measured B0 is compared with the independently calculated Be, the measured polarizability with a published value, and the measured transition dipole moment with a theoretical value from a private communication. The STIRAP master-equation simulation uses previously measured linewidths and Rabi frequencies with only the initial molecule number free, so the transfer-efficiency curve is a nontrivial consistency check rather than a forced fit. The excited-state assignment relies on unpublished theory via ref. [52], and the J''=2 hyperfine structure is admittedly not unambiguously assigned; these are reproducibility and assumption concerns, not circularity, because the theory is an external input and the ground-state identity is independently fixed by the J''=0 line and the 6B0 rotational splitting. Self-citations and group-internal references appear as background or methodological details and are not load-bearing for the central claim. No specific circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an experimental demonstration, not a derivation. The main unverified inputs are the private-communication molecular structure calculations and the unpublished Feshbach-molecule recipe. Fitted quantities such as linewidths, Rabi frequencies, and the loss coefficient are experimental observables, not parameters tuned to force agreement with a target conclusion.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective decoherence rate Γeff = 2π x 6.3(4) kHz
    Fitted in the master-equation model of the EIT spectrum and used in the STIRAP simulation (Supplemental 'EIT modeling').
  • Initial molecule number N0 = not quoted; only free parameter in the Fig. 4(b) simulation
    The STIRAP master-equation simulation is normalized to the data through this parameter; the transfer efficiency itself is measured directly from molecule counts.
  • Assumed gyromagnetic factor g_r = 0.02
    Chosen from [64] to estimate hyperfine broadening when calculating the rotational constant uncertainty.
  • Two-body loss coefficient Γ2 = 8(2)_sys(2)_stat x 10^-10 cm^3/s
    Fitted to the lifetime decay curve N(τ)=N0/(1+Γ2 nbar0 τ); this is a measured outcome, not an input, but it is a fitted parameter in the analysis.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The A1Σ0-b3ΠΩ potential curves and transition dipole moments used to assign v'=74 and v'=75 are accurate (private communication from Bouloufa-Maafa).
    Used in Table I to match observed loss features and in Table II to interpret Rabi frequencies.
  • domain assumption The loss spectroscopy signal follows N(t)=N0 exp(-t Ωp^2 Γ/(Γ^2+4Δp^2)).
    Assumes a two-level saturating transition; used to extract linewidths and Rabi frequencies in Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption A four-level master equation with a phenomenological lost state describes EIT and STIRAP dynamics.
    Supplemental 'EIT modeling'; treats all molecules outside the three relevant states as lost.
  • domain assumption The Feshbach molecule preparation via the 361.6 G resonance yields the initial state used for STIRAP.
    The initial weakly bound molecules are central to the protocol, but the recipe is cited as 'Manuscript in preparation' [48].
  • domain assumption Universal loss theory [62] provides the correct reference two-body loss coefficient for comparison.
    The measured 8 x 10^-10 cm^3/s is compared to the predicted universal rate of 2.8 x 10^-10 cm^3/s.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectroscopy and Ground-State Transfer of Ultracold Bosonic $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs Molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LC6GWUSX

@misc{pith2026250521207,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectroscopy and Ground-State Transfer of Ultracold Bosonic $^39$K$^133$Cs Molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LC6GWUSX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.21207}
}
abstract

We report the creation of ultracold samples of $^{39}$K$^{133}$Cs molecules in their rovibrational ground state. By investigating potentially suitable excited states using one- and two-photon spectroscopy, we have identified a pathway to the ground state via an exceptionally narrow intermediate state. Using Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP), we create trapped samples of up to 3500 molecules at temperatures of 1 $\mu$K with one-way efficiencies of 71%. The lifetime of these samples is limited by a near-universal two-body loss process, which could shed new light on similar loss mechanisms in other molecular species. Our results are a step towards establishing an alternative platform for the study of bosonic and fermionic quantum matter with strong dipolar interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.21207 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Calculated potential energy curves of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Loss spectroscopy of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Two-photon spectroscopy of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Loss of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [52]

    Private communication with Nadia Bouloufa-Maafa

    work page

  2. [1]

    Langen, G

    T. Langen, G. Valtolina, D. Wang, and J. Ye, Quantum state manipulation and cooling of ultracold molecules, Nature Physics20, 702 (2024)

    2024

  3. [2]

    A. N. Carroll, H. Hirzler, C. Miller, D. Wellnitz, S. R. Muleady, J. Lin, K. P. Zamarski, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Observation of generalized t-J spin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions, Sci- ence388, 381 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [3]

    L. R. B. Picard, A. J. Park, G. E. Patenotte, S. Ge- bretsadkan, D. Wellnitz, A. M. Rey, and K.-K. Ni, En- tanglement and iSW AP Gate between Molecular Qubits, Nature637, 821 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [4]

    Y. Liu, M. G. Hu, M. A. Nichols, D. Yang, D. Xie, H. Guo, and K. K. Ni, Precision test of statistical dynam- ics with state-to-state ultracold chemistry, Nature593, 379 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Observation of dipolar spin-exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules, Nature501, 521 (2013)

    2013

  7. [6]

    J.-R. Li, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, W. G. Tobias, J. S. Higgins, and J. Ye, Tunable itinerant spin dynamics with polar molecules, Nature614, 70 (2023)

    2023

  8. [7]

    Christakis, J

    L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Probing site-resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecules, Nature614, 64 (2023)

    2023

Show all 68 references
  1. [8]

    P. D. Gregory, L. M. Fernley, A. L. Tao, S. L. Brom- ley, J. Stepp, Z. Zhang, S. Kotochigova, K. R. Hazzard, and S. L. Cornish, Second-scale rotational coherence and dipolar interactions in a gas of ultracold polar molecules, Nature Physics20, 415 (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  3. [10]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K. K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer ar- ray, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    DeMille, N

    D. DeMille, N. R. Hutzler, A. M. Rey, and T. Zelevinsky, Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules, Nature Physics20, 741 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, and D. DeMille, Laser cooling of a diatomic molecule, Nature467, 820 (2010)

    2010

  6. [13]

    M. T. Hummon, M. Yeo, B. K. Stuhl, A. L. Collopy, Y. Xia, and J. Ye, 2D Magneto-Optical Trapping of Di- atomic Molecules, Physical Review Letters110, 143001 (2013)

    2013

  7. [14]

    Zhelyazkova, A

    V. Zhelyazkova, A. Cournol, T. E. Wall, A. Matsushima, J. J. Hudson, E. A. Hinds, M. R. Tarbutt, and B. E. Sauer, Laser cooling and slowing of CaF molecules, Phys- ical Review A89, 053416 (2014)

    2014

  8. [15]

    J. Lim, J. R. Almond, M. A. Trigatzis, J. A. Devlin, N. J. Fitch, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, and E. A. Hinds, Laser Cooled YbF Molecules for Measuring the Elec- tron’s Electric Dipole Moment, Physical Review Letters 120, 123201 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Y. Wu, J. J. Burau, K. Mehling, J. Ye, and S. Ding, High Phase-Space Density of Laser-Cooled Molecules in an Optical Lattice, Physical Review Letters127, 263201 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    Jorapur, T

    V. Jorapur, T. K. Langin, Q. Wang, G. Zheng, and D. DeMille, High Density Loading and Collisional Loss 6 of Laser-Cooled Molecules in an Optical Trap, Physical Review Letters132, 163403 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. H. G. de Miranda, A. Pe’er, B. Neyenhuis, J. J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. S. Julienne, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, A High Phase-Space-Density Gas of Polar Molecules, Science322, 231 (2008)

    2008

  12. [19]

    Aikawa, D

    K. Aikawa, D. Akamatsu, M. Hayashi, K. Oasa, J. Kobayashi, P. Naidon, T. Kishimoto, M. Ueda, and S. Inouye, Coherent Transfer of Photoassociated Molecules into the Rovibrational Ground State, Physi- cal Review Letters105, 203001 (2010)

    2010

  13. [20]

    Takekoshi, L

    T. Takekoshi, L. Reichs¨ ollner, A. Schindewolf, J. M. Hut- son, C. R. Le Sueur, O. Dulieu, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, and H. C. N¨ agerl, Ultracold Dense Samples of Dipo- lar RbCs Molecules in the Rovibrational and Hyper- fine Ground State, Physical Review Letters113, 205301 (2014)

    2014

  14. [21]

    P. K. Molony, P. D. Gregory, Z. Ji, B. Lu, M. P. K¨ oppinger, C. R. Le Sueur, C. L. Blackley, J. M. Hut- son, and S. L. Cornish, Creation of Ultracold 87Rb133Cs Molecules in the Rovibrational Ground State, Physical Review Letters113, 255301 (2014)

    2014

  15. [22]

    J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Ultracold Dipolar Gas of Fermionic 23Na40K Molecules in Their Absolute Ground State, Physical Review Letters114, 205302 (2015)

    2015

  16. [23]

    M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vex- iau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu´ em´ ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Creation of an Ultracold Gas of Ground-State Dipolar 23Na87Rb Molecules, Physical Review Letters 116, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  17. [24]

    T. M. Rvachov, H. Son, A. T. Sommer, S. Ebadi, J. J. Park, M. W. Zwierlein, W. Ketterle, and A. O. Jami- son, Long-Lived Ultracold Molecules with Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments, Physical Review Letters119, 143001 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    K. K. Voges, P. Gersema, M. Meyer Zum Alten Borgloh, T. A. Schulze, T. Hartmann, A. Zenesini, and S. Os- pelkaus, Ultracold Gas of Bosonic 23Na39K Ground-State Molecules, Physical Review Letters125, 83401 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    W. B. Cairncross, J. T. Zhang, L. R. Picard, Y. Yu, K. Wang, and K. K. Ni, Assembly of a Rovibrational Ground State Molecule in an Optical Tweezer, Physical Review Letters126, 123402 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    C. He, X. Nie, V. Avalos, S. Botsi, S. Kumar, A. Yang, and K. Dieckmann, Efficient Creation of Ultracold Ground State 6Li40K Polar Molecules, Physical Review Letters132, 243401 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    De Marco, G

    L. De Marco, G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J. P. Covey, and J. Ye, A degenerate Fermi gas of polar molecules, Science363, 853 (2019)

    2019

  22. [29]

    M. Duda, X. Y. Chen, A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, J. von Milczewski, R. Schmidt, I. Bloch, and X. Y. Luo, Transi- tion from a polaronic condensate to a degenerate Fermi gas of heteronuclear molecules, Nature Physics19, 720 (2023)

    2023

  23. [30]

    J. Cao, H. Yang, Z. Su, X. Y. Wang, J. Rui, B. Zhao, and J. W. Pan, Preparation of a quantum degenerate mixture of Na 23 K 40 molecules and K 40 atoms, Physical Review A107, 1 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    Bigagli, W

    N. Bigagli, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, B. Bulatovic, T. Karman, I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of Bose–Einstein condensation of dipolar molecules, Nature631, 289 (2024)

    2024

  25. [32]

    J. G. Danzl, E. Haller, M. Gustavsson, M. J. Mark, R. Hart, N. Bouloufa, O. Dulieu, H. Ritsch, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Quantum Gas of Deeply Bound Ground State Molecules, Science321, 1062 (2008)

    2008

  26. [33]

    Stevenson, A

    I. Stevenson, A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, and S. Will, Ultracold Gas of Dipolar NaCs Ground State Molecules, Physical Review Letters130, 113002 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    P. D. Gregory, M. D. Frye, J. A. Blackmore, E. M. Bridge, R. Sawant, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Sticky col- lisions of ultracold RbCs molecules, Nature Communica- tions10, 3104 (2019)

    2019

  28. [35]

    Gersema, K

    P. Gersema, K. K. Voges, M. Meyer zum Alten Bor- gloh, L. Koch, T. Hartmann, A. Zenesini, S. Ospelkaus, A. Zenesini, J. Lin, and J. He, Probing Photoinduced Two-Body Loss of Ultracold Nonreactive Bosonic and Molecules, Physical Review Letters127, 163401 (2021)

    2021

  29. [36]

    Bause, A

    R. Bause, A. Schindewolf, R. Tao, M. Duda, X. Y. Chen, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Karman, A. Christianen, I. Bloch, and X. Y. Luo, Collisions of ultracold molecules in bright and dark optical dipole traps, Physical Review Research3, 033013 (2021)

    2021

  30. [37]

    P. D. Gregory, J. A. Blackmore, S. L. Bromley, and S. L. Cornish, Loss of Ultracold 87Rb133Cs Molecules via Op- tical Excitation of Long-Lived Two-Body Collision Com- plexes, Physical Review Letters124, 163402 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    Y. Liu, M. G. Hu, M. A. Nichols, D. D. Grimes, T. Kar- man, H. Guo, and K. K. Ni, Photo-excitation of long- lived transient intermediates in ultracold reactions, Na- ture Physics16, 1132 (2020)

    2020

  32. [39]

    Bause, A

    R. Bause, A. Christianen, A. Schindewolf, I. Bloch, and X. Y. Luo, Ultracold Sticky Collisions: Theoretical and Experimental Status, Journal of Physical Chemistry A 127, 729 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    Valtolina, K

    G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J.-R. Li, L. de Marco, and J. Ye, Dipolar evaporation of reactive molecules to below the Fermi temperature, Nature588, 239 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    J. R. Li, W. G. Tobias, K. Matsuda, C. Miller, G. Val- tolina, L. De Marco, R. R. Wang, L. Lassabli` ere, G. Qu´ em´ ener, J. L. Bohn, and J. Ye, Tuning of dipolar in- teractions and evaporative cooling in a three-dimensional molecular quantum gas, Nature Physics17, 1144 (2021)

    2021

  35. [42]

    Anderegg, S

    L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Karman, E. Chae, K. K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Ob- servation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules, Science373, 779 (2021)

    2021

  36. [43]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X. Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X. Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave- shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  37. [44]

    J. Lin, G. Chen, M. Jin, Z. Shi, F. Deng, W. Zhang, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Shi, S. Yi, and D. Wang, Microwave Shielding of Bosonic NaRb Molecules, Physical Review X13, 031032 (2023)

    2023

  38. [45]

    Bigagli, C

    N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, I. Steven- son, T. Karman, and S. Will, Collisionally stable gas of bosonic dipolar ground-state molecules, Nature Physics 19, 1579 (2023)

    2023

  39. [46]

    Ladjimi and M

    H. Ladjimi and M. Tomza, Diatomic molecules of alkali- metal and alkaline-earth-metal atoms: Interaction po- tentials, dipole moments, and polarizabilities, Physical Review A109, 52814 (2024)

    2024

  40. [47]

    Vexiau, D

    R. Vexiau, D. Borsalino, M. Lepers, A. Orb´ an, M. Ay- 7 mar, O. Dulieu, and N. Bouloufa-Maafa, Dynamic dipole polarizabilities of heteronuclear alkali dimers: Optical response, trapping and control of ultracold molecules, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry36, 709 (2017)

    2017

  41. [48]

    Manuscript in preparation

  42. [49]

    Supplemental Material

  43. [50]

    Borsalino, R

    D. Borsalino, R. Vexiau, M. Aymar, E. Luc-Koenig, O. Dulieu, and N. Bouloufa-Maafa, Prospects for the for- mation of ultracold polar ground state KCs molecules via an optical process, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molec- ular and Optical Physics49, 055301 (2016)

    2016

  44. [51]

    R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley, and H. Ward, Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator, Applied Physics B Photophysics and Laser Chemistry 31, 97 (1983)

    1983

  45. [53]

    N. V. Vitanov and S. Stenholm, Adiabatic population transfer via multiple intermediate states, Physical Re- view A60, 3820 (1999)

    1999

  46. [54]

    M. Guo, R. Vexiau, B. Zhu, B. Lu, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, High-resolution molecular spec- troscopy for producing ultracold absolute-ground-state 23Na87Rb molecules, Physical Review A96, 052505 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Tamanis, I

    M. Tamanis, I. Klincare, A. Kruzins, O. Nikolayeva, R. Ferber, E. A. Pazyuk, and A. V. Stolyarov, Direct excitation of the ”dark”b 3Π state predicted by deper- turbation analysis of theA 1Σ+ −b 3Π complex in KCs, Physical Review A82, 032506 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    Kruzins, I

    A. Kruzins, I. Klincare, O. Nikolayeva, M. Tamanis, R. Ferber, E. A. Pazyuk, and A. V. Stolyarov, Fourier- transform spectroscopy and coupled-channels depertur- bation treatment of theA 1Σ+ −b 3Π complex of KCs, Physical Review A81, 042509 (2010)

    2010

  49. [57]

    Kruzins, I

    A. Kruzins, I. Klincare, O. Nikolayeva, M. Tama- nis, R. Ferber, E. A. Pazyuk, and A. V. Stolyarov, Fourier-transform spectroscopy of (4)1Σ+ →A 1Σ+−b3Π, A1Σ+ −b 3Π→X 1Σ+, and (1) 3∆1→bΠ0 transitions in KCs and deperturbation treatment ofA 1Σ+ andb 3Π states, Journal of Chemica...

    2013

  50. [58]

    Debatin, T

    M. Debatin, T. Takekoshi, R. Rameshan, L. Re- ichs¨ ollner, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, R. Vexiau, N. Boulo- ufa, O. Dulieu, and H.-C. N¨ agerl, Molecular spectroscopy for ground-state transfer of ultracold RbCs molecules, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics13, 18926 (2011)

    2011

  51. [59]

    Ferber, O

    R. Ferber, O. Nikolayeva, M. Tamanis, H. Kn¨ ockel, and E. Tiemann, Long-range coupling ofX 1Σ+ anda 3Σ+ states of the atom pair K+Cs, Physical Review A88, 012516 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    Fleischhauer, A

    M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and P. J. Marangos, Elec- tromagnetically induced transparency, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics77, 633 (2005)

    2005

  53. [61]

    L. P. Yatsenko, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Detri- mental consequences of small rapid laser fluctuations on stimulated Raman adiabatic passage, Physical Review A 89, 013831 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    P. S. Julienne, T. M. Hanna, and Z. Idziaszek, Universal ultracold collision rates for polar molecules of two alkali- metal atoms, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics13, 19114 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Aldegunde and J

    J. Aldegunde and J. M. Hutson, Hyperfine structure of alkali-metal diatomic molecules, Physical Review A96, 042506 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Aldegunde, B

    J. Aldegunde, B. A. Rivington, P. S. Zuchowski, and J. M. Hutson, Hyperfine energy levels of alkali-metal dimers: Ground-state polar molecules in electric and magnetic fields, Physical Review A78, 033434 (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    Reinaudi, T

    G. Reinaudi, T. Lahaye, Z. Wang, and D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, Strong saturation absorption imaging of dense clouds of ultracold atoms, Opt. Lett.32, 3143 (2007). 8 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL Sample purification After each sweep across the Feshbach resonance, the majority of the trapped...

    2007

  58. [66]

    and setting the unknown value ofg r to 0.02, which 0 50 100 150 Time, t (µs) 0 1 2 3 4 5N (103) (a) 0 50 100 150 Time, t (µs) 0 1 2 3 4 5N (103) (b) 0 50 100 150 Time, t (µs) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6N (103) (d) 0 50 100 150 Time, t (µs) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6N (103) (c) FIG. S1. Lifetimes of reso...

  59. [67]

    we extract the resonant frequencies at each value of the Stokes laser power and then fit these results to a lin- ear function, which gives a slope of 3.0(3) kHz/mW and 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 Pump-laser detuning, p (kHz) 0 1 2 3 4 5Number of molecules, N (103) 33 mW 13.2 mW ...

  60. [68]

    The results of these measurements fit to damped sinu- soidal functions with frequencies of 168(4) Hz and 10.6(1) Hz and are presented in Fig. S3. In order to compare the optical polarizabilities of the ground-state and Feshbach molecules we also performed a radial trap-frequen...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.