Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Enhancing van-Hove singularities in SrRuO$_3$ films by vacancy engineerings

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the nearly flat bands in SrRuO3 films are deformed remnants of exact flat bands stabilized by destructive interference, and that periodic Ru-site vacancies can generate new ones, including a complete flat band across…

desk verdict Solid CLS analysis of the fitted SrRuO3 model, with a predictive vacancy-engineering section that rests on an untested 'just erase Ru sites' assumption—worth refereeing, but the vacancy predictions need to be framed as model-based suggestions. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01894 v1 pith:LDDQF2L4 submitted 2025-06-02 cond-mat.str-el

Moon Hyoung Lee , Hyungwoo Lee , Jun-Won Rhim This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords nearlyflatbandscompactlocalizedstatesSrRuO3filmsvanHovesingularitiesvacancyengineeringdestructiveinterferencetight-bindingmodeltransitionmetaloxides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish a mechanistic origin for the nearly flat bands (NFBs) in SrRuO3 films and a design principle for creating more of them. Using a tight-binding model fitted to experimental band structures, it shows that the monolayer NFB along XM near 0.5 eV is a deformed remnant of an exact flat band of the t2 = 2t3 model, whose eigenstate is a stripe-type compact localized state stabilized by destructive interference. Periodically removing Ru atoms generates additional NFBs, some partial and some complete across the entire Brillouin zone, and the paper identifies the compact localized state behind each one. The same analysis, applied to a 4-layer film, traces many partial NFBs along Gamma-X and X-M to partial exact flat bands of a simplified interlayer-hopping model. If correct, this provides a route to flat-band physics in transition metal oxides, a material class where flat bands have been rare.

What carries the argument

The central object is the compact localized state (CLS): an eigenstate with nonzero amplitude only inside a finite spatial region, whose localization is locked by destructive interference so that all hopping processes out of the region cancel exactly. The paper's machinery constructs each CLS from the Bloch eigenvector of the flat band by reading the coefficients of the Bloch basis states as amplitudes on lattice sites, and it checks that the destructive-interference conditions—such as t2 = 2t3 in the monolayer or the vanishing of t4 in the vacancy supercells—make the CLS an exact eigenmode. This is the mechanism that carries every claim: find the exact flat band in an idealized model, identify its CLS, and then show that the realistic model is a small perturbation that turns the exact flat band into a near-flat band.

What would settle it

Measure or compute the band structure of a SrRuO3 monolayer with a periodic 2x2 Ru-vacancy pattern. If no complete near-flat band appears near zero energy, or if its bandwidth is comparable to the other bands, the central claim that periodic vacancies create a complete NFB via destructive interference would be contradicted. A density-functional calculation that lets the lattice relax around the vacancies would test the rigid-lattice assumption directly; if relaxation removes the flat band or shifts it away from zero energy, the design principle would need to be revised.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery is that the near-flatness of certain SrRuO3 film bands is not accidental but has a concrete real-space cause: these bands are the perturbed images of exact flat bands stabilized by destructive interference, and the perturbation (small deviations from ideal hopping conditions plus weak spin-orbit coupling) deforms them only slightly. In the clean monolayer, the partial NFB along XM is shown to come from an exact partial flat band of the t2 = 2t3 model, with a stripe-type compact localized state; because the realistic t2 = 0.03 eV and t3 = 0.018 eV violate t2 = 2t3 by a small amount and the SOC strength is small relative to t1, the band remains nearly flat. In the 2x2 vacancy supercell, a model with t4 = 0 and no SOC has a complete exact flat band at zero energy built from dxy compact localized states that cancel at neighboring sites, and the full model inherits this as a complete NFB; two partial flat bands along XM remain exactly flat even after SOC is turned on, with the eigenstate being a linear combination of the zero-energy CLSs plus a spin-flipped chain. In the 4x4 vacancy supercell, a complete NFB at zero energy is explained by a CLS shaped as two concentric squares surrounding the vacancy. For the 4-layer film, the partial NFBs along Gamma-X and X-M are traced to partial exact flat bands of a model with only interlayer dyz-dxz hopping; first-order perturbation theory shows that the large intra-layer tp,1 hopping merely shifts the band energies without adding dispersion.

Load-bearing premise

The vacancy-engineering analysis assumes that removing a Ru atom leaves all remaining tight-binding parameters (hoppings, on-site energies, spin-orbit coupling) unchanged, and that no lattice relaxation or charge redistribution follows, so the vacancy supercells are modeled by simply erasing Ru sites from the pristine monolayer Hamiltonian.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The monolayer NFB along XM is a deformed remnant of an exact flat band of the t2 = 2t3 model, so its flatness is protected by an approximate destructive-interference condition rather than by symmetry alone.
  • Periodic Ru-site vacancies generate additional NFBs in the 2x2 and 4x4 supercells, including a complete NFB spanning the entire Brillouin zone, which would sharply enhance the density of states at zero energy.
  • Some partial flat bands along XM in the 2x2 vacancy supercell remain exactly flat even with spin-orbit coupling, because their eigenstates are linear combinations of zero-energy CLSs plus a spin-flipped component.
  • In the 4-layer film, the partial NFBs along Gamma-X and X-M originate from partial exact flat bands of a model with only interlayer dyz-dxz hopping, with the large intra-layer hopping tp,1 shifting the bands but not disrupting their flatness.
  • Any 2n x 2n vacancy supercell of the monolayer is predicted to host a zero-energy CLS with n concentric squares, giving a systematic family of structures with enhanced van Hove singularities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the complete NFB at zero energy survives in a real material, it could host interaction-driven phases—ferromagnetism or unconventional superconductivity—in a transition metal oxide, a material class where such flat-band phenomena are rare; the paper suggests this prospect but does not compute the correlated states.
  • The concentric-square CLS pattern for 2n x 2n vacancy supercells is a testable design rule: computing bands for 6x6 or 8x8 vacancy patterns would show whether the complete NFB persists and how its bandwidth scales with supercell size.
  • The rigid-lattice assumption is the most fragile link; ab initio relaxation would likely show that oxygen cages distort around a Ru vacancy, changing hoppings and possibly destroying the exact CLS, which would quantify how strongly the design principle depends on the ideal vacancy geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes nearly flat bands (NFBs) in SrRuO3 monolayers and 4-layer films described by tight-binding models fitted to ARPES data. For the monolayer, it attributes the NFB along XM to a stripe-type compact localized state stabilized by destructive interference in the exactly flat limit t2 = 2t3. It then proposes periodic Ru-site vacancy patterns in 2x2 and 4x4 supercells, claiming additional complete and partial NFBs with identified CLSs, including flat bands at zero energy. For the 4-layer film, it assigns the multiple partial NFBs along Gamma-X and X-M to an exactly flat model obtained by turning off intralayer hopping and SOC, with first-order perturbation theory reproducing the nearly flat dispersions.

Significance. The paper has clear strengths: the CLS constructions are explicit, the flatness in the simplified parameter limits is exact and analytically demonstrated, and the perturbative formulas for the 4-layer film are concrete and testable. If the vacancy-engineering predictions survive scrutiny, the work would broaden the flat-band material platform into transition-metal oxides and connect flat-band physics to a realistic, ARPES-calibrated model. However, the central material-science claim rests on an unvalidated assumption that removing Ru atoms leaves all remaining tight-binding parameters unchanged, and the manuscript does not provide a sensitivity analysis, DFT validation, or quantitative robustness check. The significance is therefore conditional on that assumption being addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [SrRuO3 monolayer with periodic arrangements of vacancies (Figs. 2 and 4)] The vacancy-engineering proposal is implemented by deleting Ru sites from the pristine tight-binding Hamiltonian while keeping t1, t2, t3, t4, f, and lambda unchanged. This assumption is not flagged or justified. In a real SrRuO3 film, vacancy creation will relax neighboring atoms, modify the local Madelung potential and on-site energies, renormalize the remaining hopping integrals, and cause charge redistribution. The flat bands identified here, including the zero-energy CLS in Eq. (15) and the Lieb-like CLS in Eq. (9), rely on delicate cancellations among precisely these parameters, so even modest renormalizations can destroy the flatness or shift the band away from zero energy. I therefore ask for either a DFT-based check of the rigid-lattice assumption, a parameter-sensitivity analysis around the vacancy (e.g., varying near-neighbor hoppings by a few percent and showing the bandwidth remains small), or an explicit statement that the predictions are for an idealized rigid-lattice model only. The Discussion mentions STM fabrication and fluorination analogs, but it does not address this parameter-renormalization issue; that omission is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [SrRuO3 multilayer without vacancies (Eqs. (23)-(34) and Table I)] The 4-layer analysis depends on the eigenvectors f±_{p,n} and the energies in Eqs. (23)-(28), but these expressions are presented without derivation, and the notation is confusing: the tilde-f normalization and the denominator in Eq. (25) are not fully explained. More seriously, Table I is incomplete: the p = 4 row contains only six entries, while the header lists nine parameters (tp,1, tp,2, tp,3, tp,4, U, up,1, up,2, f, lambda). Without the missing values, the 4-layer Hamiltonian is not fully specified and the perturbative spectra in Fig. 5(d) cannot be independently verified. Please provide a derivation of the f± eigenvectors (or an appendix) and a complete Table I.
  3. [SrRuO3 monolayer with periodic arrangements of vacancies (Fig. 4) and Discussion] The abstract claims that vacancy engineering 'enhances' van Hove singularities, but the manuscript gives no quantitative comparison of the DOS peak height or bandwidth before and after vacancy creation. The DOS panels in Fig. 4 are shown for the 4x4 model, but there is no corresponding pristine 4x4 supercell DOS or a common normalization, so the claimed enhancement is not demonstrated quantitatively. In addition, the 'complete NFB' in the full 4x4 model is justified only by the exact EFB of the t4 = 0 model; since t4 = 0.04 eV and lambda = 0.045 eV are not negligible compared with the intended bandwidth, the residual dispersion of this band in the full model should be quantified. A small table or statement of the bandwidth and DOS peak height would make the central claim precise and testable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [SrRuO3 monolayer without vacancies (Fig. 1)] In the text after Eq. (7), the EFB model is said to be plotted 'for t2 = 0.3 eV,' but the realistic t2 is 0.03 eV and the surrounding discussion compares with t2 = 0.03 eV; please clarify whether 0.3 is a typo or an intentionally rescaled parameter set.
  2. [SrRuO3 monolayer with periodic arrangements of vacancies (Eq. (12))] Eq. (12) introduces an infinite sum over translations of |chi^(0,1)> with no discussion of normalization or boundary conditions; since this object is used to claim an exactly flat band in the presence of t4 and SOC, please specify that it should be understood as a Bloch-state combination at kx = pi and explain how the infinite sum is rendered finite in the thermodynamic limit.
  3. [SrRuO3 monolayer with periodic arrangements of vacancies (Eq. (15))] In Eq. (15), the ket notation is incomplete for the d(j), d(m), and d(o) terms; also, the figure cross-references in the 4x4 paragraph appear to be mismatched (the EFB band structure is attributed to Fig. 4(c) and the CLS to Fig. 4(b), whereas the caption assigns those panels differently).
  4. [General discussion of 2n x 2n monolayers] The statement that 'one can note the existence of a zero-energy CLS with n concentric squares in any 2n x 2n SrRuO3 monolayer' is made without proof or even a sketch; if this is a conjecture, it should be labeled as such, and if it is a theorem, a proof outline is needed.
  5. [Table I caption] The caption reads 'Hopping parameters for 4-layer SRO [1]', but the citation [1] is Stoner's 1938 paper, not the ARPES fitting work; this should cite the appropriate reference (likely Ref. [58]).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fitted TB parameters come from an independent experimental fit, and the vacancy-engineered flat bands are genuine outputs of new Hamiltonians rather than restatements of the inputs.

full rationale

Reviewed the derivation chain. The monolayer Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) and hopping parameters (t1=0.28, t2=0.03, t3=0.018, t4=0.04, f=0.015, lambda=0.045 eV) are taken from Ref. [58], where they were extracted by fitting to ARPES band structures; this is an external, experimentally anchored input, not a quantity predicted in this paper. The later claim that the NFB along XM is a remnant of the t2=2t3 EFB (Sec. 'SrRuO3 monolayer without vacancies') is an explanatory diagnosis of that fitted model, not a derivation of the fit from itself. The CLS solutions are constructed explicitly from the Bloch eigenvectors (e.g., Eqs. 7-11), so they are exact algebraic consequences of the stated Hamiltonian. The vacancy supercells in 'SrRuO3 monolayer with periodic arrangements of vacancies' are new Hamiltonians formed by site removal with unchanged parameters; their flat bands are computed outputs, not inputs used to define parameters. The assumption that vacancy creation leaves the TB parameters unrenormalized is an unvalidated modeling approximation and a validity risk, but it is not circular reasoning. No equation reduces to its own input and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Any self-citation involved in sourcing the Hamiltonian is supported by independent experimental data and does not carry the argument in a circular way.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest entirely on a tight-binding model with parameters fitted to experiment (from ref [58]) and on the assumption that vacancies act as pure site removals. No new physical entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced. The exact flat-band limits (t2=2t3, t2=2f) are parameter choices, not new entities.

free parameters (2)
  • Monolayer tight-binding parameters (t1,t2,t3,t4,f,λ) = 0.28, 0.03, 0.018, 0.04, 0.015, 0.045 eV
    Fitted to experimental band structure in ref [58]; the NFB analysis depends on t2≈2t3 and t2=2f.
  • 4-layer tight-binding parameters (Table I) = See Table I: tp,1, tp,2, tp,3, tp,4, U, up,1, up,2, f, λ
    From ref [58]; used for the multilayer NFB predictions.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The tight-binding model from ref [58] accurately describes the low-energy electronic structure of SrRuO3 films.
    Invoked at the start of the Results; the paper relies on this model rather than deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper Periodic Ru-site vacancies do not alter the remaining hopping integrals, on-site energies, or spin-orbit coupling, and cause no lattice relaxation.
    The vacancy supercells are built by removing Ru sites from the pristine Hamiltonian; this assumption is not flagged or justified.
  • standard math The Bloch-eigenvector-to-CLS decomposition, which maps flat-band eigenvectors to compact localized states, is valid for the models considered.
    Used throughout to construct CLSs; established in refs [19,21].
  • standard math First-order perturbation theory is sufficient to describe the deformation of the 4-layer EFBs when intra-layer hoppings are turned on.
    Used in Eq. (33)-(34); the authors verify approximate agreement with numerics but do not provide error bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancing van-Hove singularities in SrRuO$_3$ films by vacancy engineerings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LDDQF2L4

@misc{pith2026250601894,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancing van-Hove singularities in SrRuO$_3$ films by vacancy engineerings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LDDQF2L4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01894}
}
abstract

Flat bands, characterized by their localized electronic states and van Hove singularities, provide an ideal platform for exploring many-body physics. However, transition metal oxides hosting flat bands are quite rare. In this study, we investigate the origin of the existing nearly flat bands (NFBs) in SrRuO$_3$ thin films and demonstrate how to increase the number of them through structural modifications. Using a tight-binding model that replicates experimental band structures, we analyze the SrRuO$_3$ monolayer, revealing the origin of its NFBs along the $x$ and $y$ directions. These NFBs arise from destructive interference stabilizing strip-type compact localized states. By introducing periodic Ru-site vacancies, additional NFBs are generated, classified as partial or complete, depending on their Brillouin zone coverage. The compact localized states associated with these NFBs are identified, providing insight into their physical origin. For a 4-layer SrRuO$_3$ multilayer film, we uncover many partial NFBs along the $\Gamma$X and XM directions and reveal the distinct origin of their development. Our findings highlight the potential of engineering flat bands in SrRuO$_3$ films, offering new opportunities for exploring correlated electronic phases and expanding the material platform for flat-band physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.01894 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Upper view of the SRO monolayer without vacancies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) The lattice structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) The band structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Lattice structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) Lattice structure of the four-layer SrRuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. C. Stoner, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sci- ences 165, 372 (1938)

    work page 1938

  2. [2]

    Chuang, A

    Y .-D. Chuang, A. Gromko, D. Dessau, T. Kimura, and Y . Tokura, Science 292, 1509 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Kordyuk, Low Temperature Physics 41, 319 (2015)

    A. Kordyuk, Low Temperature Physics 41, 319 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Johannes and I

    M. Johannes and I. Mazin, Physical Review B—Condensed Ma tter and Materials Physics 77, 165135 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, H. Fan, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Physic al review letters 109, 186805 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Mielke, Physics Letters A 174, 443 (1993)

    A. Mielke, Physics Letters A 174, 443 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    Tasaki, Progress of theoretical physics 99, 489 (1998)

    H. Tasaki, Progress of theoretical physics 99, 489 (1998)

    work page 1998

  8. [8]

    I. Hase, T. Y anagisawa, Y . Aiura, and K. Kawashima, Physical review letters 120, 196401 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watana be, T. Taniguchi, M. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Science 365, 605 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Saito, J

    Y . Saito, J. Ge, L. Rademaker, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi , D. A. Abanin, and A. F. Y oung, Nature Physics 17, 478 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Aoki, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnet ism 33, 2341 (2020)

    H. Aoki, Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnet ism 33, 2341 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    V olovik, JETP Letters 59, 830 (1994)

    G. V olovik, JETP Letters 59, 830 (1994). 19

    1994

  5. [13]

    G. E. V olovik, JETP Letters 107, 516 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Peri, Z.-D

    V . Peri, Z.-D. Song, B. A. Bernevig, and S. D. Huber, Phys ical review letters 126, 027002 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    C. Wu, D. Bergman, L. Balents, and S. Das Sarma, Physical review letters 99, 070401 (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    Neupert, L

    T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Physical review letters 106, 236804 (2011)

    2011

  9. [17]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review X 1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras, and P . Jarillo-Herrero, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Physical Review B—C ondensed Matter and Materials Physics 78, 125104 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Leykam, A

    D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Advances in Physi cs: X 3, 1473052 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Y ang, Physical Review B 99, 045107 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Park and J.-W

    J.-H. Park and J.-W. Rhim, Communications Physics 7, 179 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Y ang, Advances in Physics: X 6, 1901606 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Ma, J.-W

    J. Ma, J.-W. Rhim, L. Tang, S. Xia, H. Wang, X. Zheng, S. Xi a, D. Song, Y . Hu, Y . Li, et al., Physical Review Letters 124, 183901 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Buzek and M

    V . Buzek and M. Hillery, Physical Review A 54, 1844 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    Dodonov, O

    V . Dodonov, O. Man’Ko, V . Man’Ko, and A. W¨ unsche, Journal of Modern Optics 47, 633 (2000)

    2000

  19. [27]

    J.-W. Rhim, K. Kim, and B.-J. Y ang, Nature 584, 59 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    C.-g. Oh, K. W. Kim, and J.-W. Rhim, Advanced Science p. 2 411313 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    C.-g. Oh, D. Cho, S. Y . Park, and J.-W. Rhim, Communicati ons Physics 5, 320 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Kim, C.-g

    H. Kim, C.-g. Oh, and J.-W. Rhim, Communications Physic s 6, 305 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    J.-X. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, Nature 612, 647 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    M. Han, H. Inoue, S. Fang, C. John, L. Y e, M. K. Chan, D. Gra f, T. Suzuki, M. P . Ghimire, W. J. Cho, et al., Nature communications 12, 5345 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Y . Xu, J. Zhao, C. Yi, Q. Wang, Q. Yin, Y . Wang, X. Hu, L. Wan g, E. Liu, G. Xu, et al., Nature communications 11, 3985 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    M. Li, Q. Wang, G. Wang, Z. Y uan, W. Song, R. Lou, Z. Liu, Y . Huang, Z. Liu, H. Lei, et al., Nature communications 12, 3129 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, G. Chang, Q. Wang, S. S. Tsirkin, Z . Guguchia, B. Lian, H. Zhou, K. Jiang, I. Belopolski, et al., Nature Physics 15, 443 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Z. Sun, H. Zhou, C. Wang, S. Kumar, D. Geng, S. Y ue, X. Han, Y . Haraguchi, K. Shimada, P . Cheng, 20 et al., Nano Letters 22, 4596 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Zhang, Z

    H. Zhang, Z. Shi, Z. Jiang, M. Y ang, J. Zhang, Z. Meng, T. H u, F. Liu, L. Cheng, Y . Xie, et al., Advanced Materials 35, 2301790 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    M. Pan, X. Zhang, Y . Zhou, P . Wang, Q. Bian, H. Liu, X. Wang, X. Li, A. Chen, X. Lei, et al., Physical Review Letters 130, 036203 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Huang, C

    J. Huang, C. Setty, L. Deng, J.-Y . Y ou, H. Liu, S. Shao, J. S. Oh, Y . Guo, Y . Zhang, Z. Y ue, et al., npj Quantum Materials 9, 71 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Fleurence, C.-C

    A. Fleurence, C.-C. Lee, R. Friedlein, Y . Fukaya, S. Y os himoto, K. Mukai, H. Y amane, N. Kosugi, J. Y oshinobu, T. Ozaki, et al., Physical Review B 102, 201102 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, L. Y e, H. C. Po, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak , A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelsky, et al., Nature communications 11, 4004 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    M. Kang, L. Y e, S. Fang, J.-S. Y ou, A. Levitan, M. Han, J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Roten- berg, et al., Nature materials 19, 163 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    J. H. Lee, G. W. Kim, I. Song, Y . Kim, Y . Lee, S. J. Y oo, D.-Y . Cho, J.-W. Rhim, J. Jung, G. Kim, et al., ACS nano 18, 25535 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    H. H. Kung, Transition metal oxides: surface chemistry and catalysis (Elsevier, 1989)

    1989

  37. [45]

    Tokura and N

    Y . Tokura and N. Nagaosa, science 288, 462 (2000)

    2000

  38. [46]

    Poizot, S

    P . Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, and J. Tar ascon, Nature 407, 496 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    Sawa, Materials today 11, 28 (2008)

    A. Sawa, Materials today 11, 28 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    P . A. Cox, Transition metal oxides: an introduction to their electronic structure and properties (Oxford university press, 2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    Maekawa, T

    S. Maekawa, T. Tohyama, S. E. Barnes, S. Ishihara, W. Kos hibae, and G. Khaliullin, Physics of tran- sition metal oxides, vol. 144 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    Kalantar-Zadeh, J

    K. Kalantar-Zadeh, J. Z. Ou, T. Daeneke, A. Mitchell, T. Sasaki, and M. S. Fuhrer, Applied Materials Today 5, 73 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Y uan, H

    C. Y uan, H. B. Wu, Y . Xie, and X. W. Lou, Angewandte ChemieInternational Edition 53, 1488 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Meyer, S

    J. Meyer, S. Hamwi, M. Kr¨ oger, W. Kowalsky, T. Riedl, an d A. Kahn, Advanced materials 24, 5408 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    L. Jin, N. V arnava, D. Ni, X. Gui, X. Xu, Y . Xu, B. A. Bernev ig, and R. J. Cava, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2218997120 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Jovic, R

    V . Jovic, R. J. Koch, S. K. Panda, H. Berger, P . Bugnon, A. Magrez, K. E. Smith, S. Biermann, 21 C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, et al., Physical Review B 98, 241101 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    I. Hase, T. Y anagisawa, and K. Kawashima, Nanomaterial s 9, 876 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    I. Hase, Y . Higashi, and T. Y anagisawa, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series (IOP Publishing, 2022), vol. 2164, p. 012063

    2022

  49. [57]

    I. Hase, T. Y anagisawa, and K. Kawashima, Nanoscale res earch letters 13, 1 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    B. Sohn, E. Lee, S. Y . Park, W. Kyung, J. Hwang, J. D. Denli nger, M. Kim, D. Kim, B. Kim, H. Ryu, et al., Nature Materials 20, 1643 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Toyota, I

    D. Toyota, I. Ohkubo, H. Kumigashira, M. Oshima, T. Ohni shi, M. Lippmaa, M. Takizawa, A. Fuji- mori, K. Ono, M. Kawasaki, et al., Applied Physics Letters 87 (2005)

    2005

  52. [60]

    M. Zhu, P . Li, L. Hu, R. Wei, J. Y ang, W. Song, X. Zhu, and Y . Sun, Journal of Applied Physics 132 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Ishigami, K

    K. Ishigami, K. Y oshimatsu, D. Toyota, M. Takizawa, T. Yoshida, G. Shibata, T. Harano, Y . Takahashi, T. Kadono, V . V erma, et al., Physical Review B92, 064402 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    P .-C. Wu, H. Song, Y . Y uan, B. Feng, Y . Ikuhara, R. Huang, P . Y u, C.-G. Duan, and Y .-H. Chu, Physical Review Materials 4, 014401 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Jansen, T

    D. Jansen, T. Tounsi, J. Fischer, A. V . Krasheninnikov,T. Michely, H.-P . Komsa, and W. Jolie, Physical Review B 109, 195430 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    Ohsawa, R

    T. Ohsawa, R. Shimizu, K. Iwaya, and T. Hitosugi, ACS nan o 8, 2223 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    J. Shin, A. Y . Borisevich, V . Meunier, J. Zhou, E. W. Plummer, S. V . Kalinin, and A. P . Baddorf, ACS nano 4, 4190 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    S. Mo, J. Seo, S.-K. Son, S. Kim, J.-W. Rhim, and H. Lee, Na no Letters 24, 4885 (2024). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS J.W.R. was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (Grant nos. 2021R1A2C1010572 and 2022M3H3A1063074). H.L...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.