Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Data-driven analysis of anomalous transport and three-wave-coupling effects in E x B plasma discharges

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper identifies the first electron cyclotron drift instability mode as the dominant driver of anomalous electron transport in E×B plasmas.

desk verdict A clean bispectrum decomposition of E×B anomalous transport, with an inverse-cascade conclusion that is only as strong as some very weak SINDy fits. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19789 v1 pith:LFBJHZ46 submitted 2024-12-27 physics.plasm-ph

Borja Bayón-Buján , Enrique Bello-Benítez , Jiewei Zhou , Mario Merino This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords E×Bplasmaanomalouselectrontransportcyclotrondriftinstabilitybicoherencethree-wavecouplinginverseenergycascadeSINDyHallthruster
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks which azimuthal oscillations actually carry collisionless electron transport across the magnetic field in an E×B plasma representative of a Hall thruster channel. Using a full particle-in-cell simulation, it concludes that the first electron cyclotron drift instability mode M1 dominates the axial electron current because its electron-density and azimuthal-electric-field fluctuations oscillate in phase, making the time-averaged $(e/B)n_eE_y$ term large. A secondary contribution comes from a low-frequency mode A1 not predicted by linear ECDI theory, while the higher ECDI modes M2 and M3 contribute little directly. Bicoherence and sparse-regression modeling of three-wave coupling then suggest that M2 and M3 feed energy into M1 through an inverse energy cascade, so the higher modes matter indirectly as the energy source for the transport-carrying mode. If this picture holds, anomalous-transport models should track phase coherence among a few discrete modes rather than treating the turbulence as broadband.

What carries the argument

The central objects are Fourier modes of the fluctuating electrostatic potential, electron density $n_e$, azimuthal electric field $E_y$, and axial electron current $j_{ze}$, taken at a single axial slice $z=1.98\,\mathrm{mm}$ of a two-dimensional $(z,\theta)$ full-PIC simulation. The determining tool is the cross-bispectrum $B_{n_eE_yj^{\mathrm{flux}}}(\omega_1,\omega_2,k_1,k_2)$, whose zero-frequency, zero-wavenumber slice decomposes the anomalous current term $(e/B)n_eE_y$ into contributions from pairs of coupled $n_e$ and $E_y$ modes; its normalized form, the bicoherence, measures how strongly the phases of three modes are locked. The second half of the argument is carried by a sparse symbolic-regression model (SINDy) fit to power evolution equations implied by the three-wave coupling equations, $\partial_t P_i = 2\gamma_i P_i - v_{gz,i}\,\partial_z P_i + \sum_{j,k} 2V'_{ijk}\sqrt{P_iP_jP_k}$, restricted to the three retained ECDI modes M1, M2, M3 and the two triads $\mathrm{M1M1}\leftrightarrow\mathrm{M2}$ and $\mathrm{M1M2}\leftrightarrow\mathrm{M3}$.

What would settle it

Repeat the SINDy three-wave regression at several axial positions and with the $n_e$ field added to the model state: if the inverse-cascade sign structure of the M1, M2, and M3 coefficients is not stable, or if including $n_e$ substantially changes the fitted signs, the claim of a dominant $E_y$-driven inverse cascade would be undercut.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that in the saturated nonlinear state of the simulated discharge the cross-field electron transport is carried almost entirely by the flux term $j_{ze}^{\mathrm{flux}}=(e/B)n_eE_y$, and that within this term the dominant spectral contributors are the first ECDI mode M1 (about 42 MHz, azimuthal wavenumber $kL_y=7$) and, secondarily, the lower-frequency mode A1. The reason M1 is efficient is phase: the cross-bispectrum of $n_e$, $E_y$, and $j_{ze}^{\mathrm{flux}}$ at the zero-frequency, zero-wavenumber component shows that the $n_e$ and $E_y$ oscillations contributing to M1 are in phase, whereas other modes' contributions are not. The paper further claims that among the ECDI modes there is strong quadratic phase coupling, with bicoherence values up to 0.8, and that a SINDy sparse regression of the three-wave amplitude equations for M1, M2, and M3 yields a sign structure consistent with an inverse energy cascade in which M2 and M3 lose energy to M1; the fitted linear growth rate of M1 is negative, which the authors interpret as a net loss of M1 energy to anomalous transport. The authors state explicitly that the fit scores are weak ($R^2$ between 0.03 and 0.13) and that this casts reasonable doubt, but they maintain that the model still captures the essential dynamics of the retained modes.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on trusting a three-wave model whose fits explain at most 13 percent of the variance, and on assuming that a single axial slice chosen for large oscillation amplitude represents the whole discharge.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Anomalous-transport models should aim to reproduce the phase relationship between $n_e$ and $E_y$, not just fluctuation amplitudes or spectra, because the time-averaged $(e/B)n_eE_y$ term depends on that phase.
  • Higher-frequency ECDI modes matter for transport even when their direct contribution to $j_{ze}$ is small, since in the cascade picture they are the energy source for the transport-carrying M1 mode; reduced models should retain at least the M1-M2-M3 triad.
  • Weak-turbulence, three-wave-coupling theory appears suitable for describing the saturated ECDI spectrum, which would allow linear-stability analyses to be extended by quadratic transfer terms instead of requiring a full nonlinear simulation for every operating point.
  • The low-frequency modes A1 and O modulate the discharge and alternate in time with the M-branch, so a complete transport description in an E×B discharge may need several independent oscillation mechanisms coupled through the axial current.
  • AC components of the axial current, although not themselves DC transport in a uniform plasma, could be rectified by axial boundary conditions such as an anode, so the AC part of the spectrum should be included when comparing with experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the inverse-cascade picture is correct, a practical lever for reducing anomalous transport would be to suppress or shift the M2 and M3 modes, for example by changing the injected ion or electron distributions or the azimuthal domain length, so that less energy is delivered to M1; this prediction goes beyond what the paper runs.
  • The paper's single-slice assumption could be checked by repeating the bispectrum and SINDy analysis at multiple axial locations; if the cascade sign or the leading transport mode changes with $z$, transport closures will need to be spatially dependent.
  • The distinctly different bicoherence structure of $n_e$ versus $E_y$ suggests that a two-field spectral model coupling $E_y$ mode powers with $n_e$ mode powers could raise the low $R^2$ scores, and testing this would clarify whether the weak fits are a modeling gap or evidence against the cascade.
  • The same bispectrum-plus-sparse-regression pipeline could be applied to experimental probe or microwave-interferometry data from a real thruster to look directly for M1 phase coherence and the M1-M2-M3 triad in measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes data from a 2D (z,θ) full-PIC simulation of a collisionless E×B plasma relevant to Hall thrusters. Using higher-order spectral analysis, it decomposes the fluctuating axial electron current j_ze^{fluc} = (e/B) n_e E_y into contributions from distinct spectral modes, identifying the first ECDI mode M1 and a lower-frequency mode A1 as the dominant direct contributors to the (0,0) transport bispectrum. A bicoherence analysis of E_y and n_e reveals strong quadratic phase couplings among ECDI modes and the A-branch. The paper then builds sparse-regression (SINDy) models for the power-spectral-density evolution of modes M1, M2, and M3, based on three-wave coupling equations, and interprets the signs of the fitted coefficients as evidence of an inverse energy cascade from higher-frequency modes (M2, M3) into M1, which in turn drives the anomalous transport.

Significance. The direct transport decomposition via Eq. (20) and Fig. 5 is a clean, self-contained spectral measurement that credibly establishes the dominant contribution of M1 and A1 to the anomalous axial current. This is a valuable methodological contribution and supports the weak-turbulence picture for the transport channel. If the inverse-cascade direction were robustly supported, the paper would also provide a concrete mechanism linking higher ECDI harmonics to the transport-driving mode, a question of active interest. However, the cascade conclusion currently rests on SINDy fits with R² between 0.03 and 0.13, for which no uncertainty quantification or sign-stability analysis is provided; the paper itself acknowledges these low scores and explicitly assumes the weak fits capture the essential dynamics. The central transport claim is sound, but the cascade claim is not yet established at the same level of confidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV.C, Table 2] The inverse-cascade conclusion is inferred solely from the signs of the fitted three-wave coefficients in Table 2, where the Pareto-knee models have R² = 0.12 (P1), 0.07 (P2), and 0.04 (P3). For P3, the fit is essentially indistinguishable from noise, and for P1 and P2 it explains only a small fraction of the variance. No confidence intervals, bootstrap estimates, or cross-validation are reported, and the sign of the (M1,M1,M2) coupling is the load-bearing element for the claim that energy flows from M2 into M1. The paper states "we shall assume that the weak fit obtained correctly captures the essential dynamics among the retained modes" (§IV.C). Given the fit quality, this assumption is not justified without a sign-stability test over the SINDy window, the averaging rectangle, and the Pareto-knee selection rule. Such a test is necessary before the inverse cascade can be claimed as "the most likely explanation."
  2. [§IV.A and §IV.C] All spectral and SINDy analyses are performed on a single axial slice at z = 1.98 mm, chosen because oscillations display large magnitude there. The paper does not demonstrate that this slice is representative of the discharge for the transport decomposition or for the sign structure of the three-wave couplings. Since the transport bispectrum and the SINDy model are both computed at only this one azimuthal position, a sensitivity check over a few axial positions (or a justification based on the axial structure of the modes) is needed to support the general claims made in the abstract and conclusions.
  3. [§IV.C, Eqs. (22)–(23)] The reduction from the three-wave amplitude equation to the PSD equation assumes that cos(α_ijk) is essentially constant over the fitting window, supported only by the large bicoherence values. This is a plausible but unverified simplification. More importantly, the model omits the A-branch modes and mode O, and the paper acknowledges that this omission is a likely cause of the low R² values. Because the retained triad coefficients are derived from a model that explains at most 13% of the variance, the possibility that additional couplings (e.g., with n_e or with A1/A2) could change the sign or magnitude of the retained couplings is not excluded. The authors themselves note in the conclusions that a two-field description may be necessary; this undercuts the robustness of the single-field cascade inference as presented.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and text] There are several typographical errors: "adviced" should be "advised" (end of Section I), "Nevetheless" should be "Nevertheless" (beginning of Section V), and "reminder" should be "remainder" (Section III).
  2. [Eq. (8)] The bicoherence definition in Eq. (8) is written with products of second moments in the denominator; it would be clearer to explicitly indicate that the expectations are taken over the same realizations used for the bispectrum, and to note the normalization used in the code (e.g., the 95% significance level of sqrt(3/N) is given but not derived).
  3. [Section III.B] In Eq. (14), the definition of β*_ij as the coefficient estimates from optimizing ε_S alone should be stated before it is used in the ALASSO penalty, since the current wording makes the circular dependence slightly confusing.
  4. [Data availability] The data availability statement contains a placeholder "XXXXXXXX" instead of an actual DOI or URL; this should be filled in before publication.
  5. [Section IV.A] The statement that the choice of ion mass is arbitrary for the conclusions of spectral analysis is reasonable for the linear frequencies because of the 1/sqrt(m_i) scaling, but the inverse-cascade direction inferred from the SINDy coefficients is a nonlinear property and may not scale trivially; a brief comment on this would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the transport decomposition is a direct spectral measurement and the inverse-cascade inference, while statistically weak, is a fitted model output rather than a hidden restatement of its inputs.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the transport attribution in Sec. IV.B is self-contained. Equation (18) defines j_ze^fluc as (e/B)n_e E_y, Eq. (20) is an algebraic identity decomposing its power into bispectral contributors, and Fig. 3 demonstrates that this term dominates the full j_ze. The identification of M1 and A1 as dominant transport peaks is a spectral measurement on the PIC data, not a fitted parameter. The only candidate for circularity is the inverse-cascade conclusion in Sec. IV.C. There, the authors fit SINDy coefficients to PSD time series of M1-M3 and read the energy-flow direction from the signs of the fitted V_ijk coefficients. This is not circular by construction: the sign pattern is not fixed by the input data or by the assumed Eq. (23); it is the output of the regression. The real weakness is statistical, namely R2 values between 0.03 and 0.13, no uncertainty quantification, and the authors' own caveats: 'we shall assume that the weak fit obtained correctly captures the essential dynamics among the retained modes' and 'low fit scores cast a reasonable doubt on this last conclusion.' That is a robustness/correctness risk, not a self-referential reduction. Self-citations (refs. 7, 20, 24, 27, 37-39, 46) are provenance for the simulation, code, and prior SINDy applications; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification of the central physical claim. No step in the paper is equivalent by definition to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The transport decomposition itself uses no fitted parameters beyond the simulation setup. The inverse-cascade conclusion, however, rests on SINDy models whose coefficients are fitted to the same PSD time series analyzed with bicoherence, and whose sign structure is interpreted as energy flow. Several modeling assumptions are explicit: weak turbulence three-wave coupling applies despite approximate resonance conditions, cos(alpha) is constant, the weak fit captures essential dynamics, and the hydrogen-ion simulation represents heavier propellants. No new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (4)
  • SINDy linear growth/damping rates gamma1, gamma2, gamma3 = -8.72e5 s^-1, 5.94e5 s^-1, 7.00e5 s^-1 (Pareto knee models)
    Fitted to PSD time series of modes M1-M3; signs used to support the inverse-cascade interpretation.
  • Three-wave coupling coefficients V112 and V123 = V112: 8.90e-3 (P1 eq), -1.66e-4 (P2 eq); V123: 4.02e-2 (P1 eq), -2.48e-3 (P2 eq), -1.84e-4 (P3 eq)
    Fitted to data; sign structure determines inferred energy flow direction.
  • Spectral averaging window and SINDy time window = domega/2pi=0.7 MHz, dkLy/2pi=1; window 1.4 microseconds, step 0.3 microseconds
    Chosen by hand to balance spectral resolution and noise; sensitivity checked within +/-0.1 microseconds.
  • SINDy regularization hyperparameters lambda_i = not reported numerically
    Selected via Pareto front knee for each mode; affects which terms are retained in the model.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The spectrum scales as 1/sqrt(mi), so hydrogen ions are representative of heavier propellant species
    Used in §II to justify mi=1 amu; if the scaling breaks down nonlinearly, conclusions may not transfer to real thrusters.
  • domain assumption jze approximately equals (e/B) ne Ey dominates transport; other terms are O(me/B) and negligible
    Used in §IV.B, equations (17)-(18); confirmed in Figure 3 for this simulation but not universally guaranteed.
  • domain assumption Weak turbulence / three-wave coupling equations govern the nonlinear mode dynamics
    Used in §IV.C; the paper aims to support this theory, so assuming it to interpret the data risks some circularity.
  • ad hoc to paper cos(alpha_ijk) is essentially constant over the fitting window
    Stated in §IV.C: 'we take the ansatz that the mode interactions remain moderately coherent over time such that cos alpha_ijk remains essentially constant'.
  • ad hoc to paper The weak SINDy fit correctly captures the essential dynamics among the retained modes
    Stated in §IV.C: 'we shall assume that the weak fit obtained correctly captures the essential dynamics among the retained modes'.
  • ad hoc to paper Approximate satisfaction of resonance conditions is sufficient for three-wave interactions
    In §IV.C: 'the resonant interaction between M1, M2 and M3 must be understood in an broad sense, because the resonance conditions are not strictly satisfied among the central values'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Data-driven analysis of anomalous transport and three-wave-coupling effects in E x B plasma discharges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LFBJHZ46

@misc{pith2026241219789,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Data-driven analysis of anomalous transport and three-wave-coupling effects in E x B plasma discharges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LFBJHZ46}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19789}
}
read the original abstract

Collisionless cross-field electron transport in an E x B configuration relevant for electric propulsion is studied using data from a (z, {\theta}) full-PIC simulation. Higher-order spectral analysis shows that transport is dominated by the in-phase interaction of the oscillations of the azimuthal electric field and the electron density associated to the first electron cyclotron drift instability (ECDI) mode. A secondary contribution emanates from a lower-frequency mode, not predicted by linear ECDI theory, while higher modes have a minor direct impact on transport. However, a bicoherence analysis reveals that strong phase couplings exist among the ECDI modes, and a sparse symbolic regression spectral model, based on the three-wave coupling equations, suggests an inverse energy cascade as the most likely explanation, thus suggesting that higher modes contribute indirectly to transport by quadratic power transfer to the first mode. This work provides new insights into the dynamics of anomalous plasma transport in E x B sources and the underlying processes governing energy distribution across different scales, and supports the validity of weak turbulence theory to examine their behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19789 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram sketching the full-PIC simulation domain, boundary conditions and initial equilibrium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalized oscillations of ϕ present in the full-PIC simulation. (a) snapshot at t = 2.45µs; (b) normalized PSD dispersion in the ω–k plane; (c) normalized PSD t–k spectrogram; (d) Real frequency and growth rate, respectively in black and red, as computed from linear theory.20 The vertical dashed red lines mark kLy/2π = 7, 13, 19 . The dotted black line in (a) denotes the axial slice (z = 1.98mm) where both the disp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time-evolution of the electron axial current compared to the current induced by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Power spectral density of (a) jze and (b) j f luc ze as taken from the axial slice at z = 1.98mm. Plot (c) showcases the resulting power from integrating over k, with the power of jze in blue and that of j f luc ze in red. Modes O, A1, A2, M1, M2, M3 correspond to the …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Real part of the cross-bispectrum of ne, Ey and j f luc ze , reflecting the spectral contribution to the net cross-field current driven by instability, (ω, kLy) = (0 MHz, 0). Areas shaded in white denote negative values. The plot on the right showcases the resulting po…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a) Self-bicoherence of Ey, b) Self-bicoherence of ne. White space denotes the redundant or inaccessible areas. Upper plots are in ω; lower plots in k. 12 of 18 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic of the power flux in the Pareto-optimal reconstructed model in table 2, with arrows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Smolyakov, A., Raitses, Y., Ahedo, E., Mikellides, I

    Kaganovich, I. D., Smolyakov, A., Raitses, Y., Ahedo, E., Mikellides, I. G., Jorns, B., Taccogna, F., Gueroult, R., Tsikata, S., Bourdon, A., Boeuf, J.-P., Keidar, M., Powis, A. T., Merino, M., Cappelli, M., Hara, K., Carlsson, J. A., Fisch, N. J., Chabert, P., Schweigert, I., Lafleur, T., Matyash, K., Khrabrov, A. V., Boswell, R. W., and Fruchtman, A., P...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Applied Physics\/ , Vol

    Boeuf, J., Tutorial: P hysics and modeling of H all thrusters, J. Applied Physics\/ , Vol. 121, No. 1, 2017, pp. 011101

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Hepner, S., Wachs, B., and Jorns, B., Wave-driven non-classical electron transport in a low temperature magnetically expanding plasma, Applied Physics Letters\/ , Vol. 116, No. 26, 2020, pp. 263502

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    W., Wave-driven electron inward transport in a magnetic nozzle, Scientific reports\/ , Vol

    Takahashi, K., Charles, C., and Boswell, R. W., Wave-driven electron inward transport in a magnetic nozzle, Scientific reports\/ , Vol. 12, No. 1, 2022, pp. 20137

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Maddaloni, D., Bayón-Buján, B., Navarro-Cavallé, J., and Merino, M., Low-frequency oscillations in the magnetic nozzle of a Helicon Plasma Thruster, Plasma Sources Scinece and Technology (under review)\/ , 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    and Lowder, R., Anomalous electron diffusion and ion acceleration in a low-density plasma, Physics of Fluids\/ , Vol

    Janes, G. and Lowder, R., Anomalous electron diffusion and ion acceleration in a low-density plasma, Physics of Fluids\/ , Vol. 9, No. 6, 1966, pp. 1115--1123

    work page 1966

  7. [7]

    J., and Ahedo, E., Two-dimensional kinetic simulation of electrostatic instabilities in a H all plasma, 37^ th International Electric Propulsion Conference\/ , No

    Bello-Ben\'itez, E., Mar\'in-Cebri\'an, A., Ramos, J. J., and Ahedo, E., Two-dimensional kinetic simulation of electrostatic instabilities in a H all plasma, 37^ th International Electric Propulsion Conference\/ , No. IEPC-2022-314, Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Boston, MA, June 19-23, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Lafleur, T., Baalrud, S., and Chabert, P., Theory for the anomalous electron transport in Hall effect thrusters. I. Insights from particle-in-cell simulations, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 23, 2016, pp. 053502

    work page 2016

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    25, 1970, pp

    Forslund, D., Morse, R., and Nielson, C., Electron cyclotron drift instability, Physical Review Letters\/ , Vol. 25, 1970, pp. 1266--1270

    1970

  2. [10]

    13, 1970, pp

    Wong, H., Electrostatic electron-ion streaming instability, Physics of Fluids\/ , Vol. 13, 1970, pp. 757--760

    1970

  3. [11]

    13, 2006, pp

    Ducrocq, A., Adam, J., H \'e ron, A., and Laval, G., High-frequency electron drift instability in the cross-field configuration of Hall thrusters, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 13, 2006, pp. 102111

    2006

  4. [12]

    Cavalier, J., Lemoine, N., Bonhomme, G., Tsikata, S., Honoré, C., and Grésillon, D., Hall thruster plasma fluctuations identified as the ExB electron drift instability: Modeling and fitting on experimental data, PoP\/ , Vol. 20, No. 8, 2013, pp. 082107

    2013

  5. [13]

    25, 2018, pp

    Janhunen, S., Smolyakov, A., Chapurin, O., Sydorenko, D., Kaganovich, I., and Raitses, Y., Nonlinear structures and anomalous transport in partially magnetized ExB plasmas, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 25, 2018, pp. 11608

    2018

  6. [14]

    J., The electron cyclotron drift instability: A comparison of particle-in-cell and continuum V lasov simulations, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol

    Tavassoli, A., Papahn Zadeh, M., Smolyakov, A., Shoucri, M., and Spiteri, R. J., The electron cyclotron drift instability: A comparison of particle-in-cell and continuum V lasov simulations, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 30, No. 3, 2023, 033905

    2023

  7. [15]

    and Chabert, P., The role of instability-enhanced friction on `anomalous' electron and ion transport in H all-effect thrusters , Plasma Sources Science and Technology\/ , Vol

    Lafleur, T. and Chabert, P., The role of instability-enhanced friction on `anomalous' electron and ion transport in H all-effect thrusters , Plasma Sources Science and Technology\/ , Vol. 27, 2017, pp. 015003

    2017

  8. [16]

    Asadi, Z., Taccogna, F., and Sharifian, M., Numerical Study of Electron Cyclotron Drift Instability: Application to Hall Thruster, Frontiers in Physics\/ , Vol. 7, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    and Tsikata, S., Cross-field electron diffusion due to the coupling of drift-driven microinstabilities, Phys

    Hara, K. and Tsikata, S., Cross-field electron diffusion due to the coupling of drift-driven microinstabilities, Phys. Rev. E\/ , Vol. 102, No. 2, 2020, pp. 023202

    2020

  10. [18]

    G., Ortega, A

    Mikellides, I. G., Ortega, A. L., Chaplin, V. H., and S., S. J., Facility pressure effects on a H all thruster with an external cathode, II: theoretical model of the thrust and the significance of Azimuthal asymmetries in the cathode plasma, Plasma Sources Science and Technolo...

    2020

  11. [19]

    Brown, Z. A. and Jorns, B. A., Growth and saturation of the electron drift instability in a crossed field plasma, Physical Review Letters\/ , Vol. 130, No. 11, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Bello-Benítez, E., Marín-Cebrián, A., and Ahedo, E., Effect of injection conditions on the non-linear behavior of the ECDI and related turbulent transport, 2024, Pre-print available at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.08761 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.08761

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Chen, L., Kan, Z.-C., Gao, W.-F., Duan, P., Chen, J.-Y., Tan, C.-Q., and Cui, Z.-J., Growth mechanism and characteristics of electron drift instability in Hall thruster with different propellant types, Chinese Physics B\/ , Vol. 33, No. 1, 2024, pp. 015203

    2024

  14. [22]

    P., Bourdon, A., Carlsson, J

    Charoy, T., Boeuf, J. P., Bourdon, A., Carlsson, J. A., Chabert, P., Cuenot, B., Eremin, D., Garrigues, L., Hara, K., Kaganovich, I. D., Powis, A. T., Smolyakov, A., Sydorenko, D., Tavant, A., Vermorel, O., and Villafana, W., 2 D axial-azimuthal particle-in-cell benchmark for ...

    2019

  15. [23]

    11, 2004, pp

    Adam, J., Her \'o n, A., and Laval, G., Study of stationary plasma thrusters using two-dimensional fully kinetic simulations, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 11, 2004, pp. 295--305

    2004

  16. [24]

    Maddaloni, D., Dom \'i nguez-V \' a zquez, A., Terragni, F., and Merino, M., Data-driven analysis of oscillations in Hall thruster simulations, Plasma Sources Science and Technology\/ , Vol. 31, No. 4, 4 2022, pp. 045026

    2022

  17. [25]

    Perales-D \' i az, J., Dom \' i nguez-V \' a zquez, A., Fajardo, P., and Ahedo, E., Simulations of driven breathing modes of a magnetically shielded H all thruster, Plasma Sources Science and Technology\/ , Vol. 32, No. 7, 2023, pp. 075011

    2023

  18. [26]

    N., Dynamic mode decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modeling of E B plasmas: I

    Faraji, F., Reza, M., Knoll, A., and Kutz, J. N., Dynamic mode decomposition for data-driven analysis and reduced-order modeling of E B plasmas: I. Extraction of spatiotemporally coherent patterns, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics\/ , Vol. 57, No. 6, 2023, pp. 065201

    2023

  19. [27]

    and Merino, M., Data-driven sparse modeling of oscillations in plasma space propulsion, Machine Learning Science and Technology\/ , , No

    Bay\'on-Buj\'an, B. and Merino, M., Data-driven sparse modeling of oscillations in plasma space propulsion, Machine Learning Science and Technology\/ , , No. 5, 2024, pp. 035057

    2024

  20. [28]

    Jorns, B., Predictive, data-driven model for the anomalous electron collision frequency in a H all effect thruster, Plasma Sources Science and Technology\/ , Vol. 27, No. 10, 2018, pp. 104007

    2018

  21. [29]

    Z., Galeev, A

    Sagdeev, R. Z., Galeev, A. A., O'Neil, T. M., and Book, D. L., Nonlinear plasma theory, 1969

    1969

  22. [30]

    and Wilhelmsson, H., Coherent non-linear interaction of waves in plasmas, Oxford Pergamon Press International Series on Natural Philosophy\/ , Vol

    Weiland, J. and Wilhelmsson, H., Coherent non-linear interaction of waves in plasmas, Oxford Pergamon Press International Series on Natural Philosophy\/ , Vol. 88, 1977

    1977

  23. [31]

    94, 01 1989, pp

    Lagoutte, D., Lefeuvre, F., and Hanasz, J., Application of Bicoherence Analysis in Study of Wave Interactions in Space Plasma, Journal of Geophysical Research\/ , Vol. 94, 01 1989, pp. 435--442

    1989

  24. [32]

    Nagashima, Y., Itoh, K., Itoh, S.-I., Hoshino, K., Fujisawa, A., Ejiri, A., Takase, Y., Yagi, M., Shinohara, K., Uehara, K., Kusama, Y., and group, J.-M., Observation of coherent bicoherence and biphase in potential fluctuations around geodesic acoustic mode frequency on JFT-2...

    2006

  25. [33]

    Fusion\/ , Vol

    van Milligen, B., Kalhoff, T., Pedrosa, A., and Hidalgo, C., Bicoherence during confinement transitions in the TJ-II stellarator, Nucl. Fusion\/ , Vol. 48, 11 2008, pp. 115003

    2008

  26. [34]

    Yamamoto, N., Kuwabara, N., Kuwahara, D., Cho, S., Kosuga, Y., and Dif Pradalier, G., Observation of plasma turbulence in a hall thruster using microwave interferometry, Journal of Propulsion and Power\/ , Vol. 39, No. 6, 2023, pp. 849–855

    2023

  27. [35]

    S., Durst, R

    Kim, J. S., Durst, R. D., Fonck, R. J., Fernandez, E., Ware, A., and Terry, P. W., Technique for the experimental estimation of nonlinear energy transfer in fully developed turbulence , Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 3, No. 11, 11 1996, pp. 3998--4009

    1996

  28. [36]

    P., Powers, E

    Ritz, C. P., Powers, E. J., and Bengtson, R. D., Experimental measurement of three‐wave coupling and energy cascading , Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics\/ , Vol. 1, No. 1, 01 1989, pp. 153--163

    1989

  29. [37]

    IEPC-2024-640, Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Toulouse, France, June 23-28, 2024

    Bay\'on-Buj\'an, B., Bello-Benítez, E., Zhou, J., and Merino, M., Data-driven analysis of a 2D-ExB kinetic simulation relevant to Hall thruster discharges, 38^ th International Electric Propulsion Conference\/ , No. IEPC-2024-640, Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, Toulouse, ...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Mar\' i n-Cebri\' a n, A., Bello-Ben\'itez, E., Dom\' i nguez-V\' a zquez, A., and Ahedo, E., Non-Maxwellian electron effects on the macroscopic response of a Hall thruster discharge from an axial–radial kinetic model, Plasma Sources Science and Technology\/ , Vol. 33, No. 2, ...

    2024

  31. [39]

    thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Legan \'e s, Spain, 2024

    Bello-Benítez, E., Analysis of turbulent transport in H all-effect plasma thrusters\/ , Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Legan \'e s, Spain, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Kim, Y. C. and Powers, E. J., Digital Bispectral Analysis and Its Applications to Nonlinear Wave Interactions, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science\/ , Vol. 7, 1979, pp. 120--131

    1979

  33. [41]

    and Guza, R., Statistics of bicoherence, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing\/ , Vol

    Elgar, S. and Guza, R., Statistics of bicoherence, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing\/ , Vol. 36, No. 10, 1988, pp. 1667--1668

    1988

  34. [42]

    L., Proctor, J

    Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., and Kutz, J. N., Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\/ , Vol. 113, No. 15, 2016, pp. 3932–3937

    2016

  35. [43]

    376, 2021, pp

    Cortiella, A., Park, K.-C., and Doostan, A., Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems via reweighted L1-regularized least squares, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering\/ , Vol. 376, 2021, pp. 113620

    2021

  36. [44]

    Zou, H., The Adaptive Lasso and its Oracle Properties, Journal of the American Statistical Association\/ , Vol. 101, No. 476, 2006, pp. 1418–1429

    2006

  37. [45]

    C., Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve, SIAM Review\/ , Vol

    Hansen, P. C., Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve, SIAM Review\/ , Vol. 34, No. 4, 1992, pp. 561–580

    1992

  38. [46]

    Bayón, B. and Merino, M., Data-driven Identification of the Breathing Mode governing equations, 35^ th International Conference on Plasmas and Ionized Gases\/ , Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, July 9–14, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    and Minea, T., Modulated electron cyclotron drift instability in a high-power pulsed magnetron discharge, Physical Review Letters\/ , Vol

    Tsikata, S. and Minea, T., Modulated electron cyclotron drift instability in a high-power pulsed magnetron discharge, Physical Review Letters\/ , Vol. 114, 2015, pp. 185001

    2015

  40. [48]

    97, 2010, pp

    Parker, J., Raitses, Y., and Fisch, N., Transition in electron transport in a cylindrical Hall thruster, Applied Physics Letters\/ , Vol. 97, 2010, pp. 091501

    2010

  41. [49]

    De Wit, T. D., Krasnosel'Skikh, V., Dunlop, M., and L \"u hr, H., Identifying nonlinear wave interactions in plasmas using two-point measurements: A case study of Short Large Amplitude Magnetic Structures (SLAMS), Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\/ , Vol. 104, No...

    1999

  42. [50]

    Messenger, D. A. and Bortz, D. M., Weak Sindy: Galerkin-based data-driven model selection, Multiscale Modeling & Simulation\/ , Vol. 19, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1474–1497

    2021

  43. [51]

    16, 2009, pp

    Tsikata, S., Lemoine, N., Pisarev, V., and Gresillon, D., Dispersion relations of electron density fluctuations in a H all thruster plasma, observed by collective light scattering, Physics of Plasmas\/ , Vol. 16, 2009, pp. 033506

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.