REVIEW 2 cited by
Maximal parahoric arithmetic transfers, resolutions and modularity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
For any unramified quadratic extension of $p$-adic local fields $F/F_0$ $(p>2)$, we formulate several arithmetic transfer conjectures at any maximal parahoric level, in the context of Zhang's relative trace formula approach to the arithmetic Gan--Gross--Prasad conjecture. The formulation involves a way to resolve the singularity of relevant moduli spaces via natural stratifications and modify derived fixed points. By a local-global method and double induction, we prove these conjectures for $F_0$ unramified over $\mathbb Q_p$, including the arithmetic fundamental lemma for $p>2$. Moreover, we prove new modularity results for arithmetic theta series at parahoric levels via a method of modification over $\mathbb F_q$ and $\mathbb C$. Along the way, we study the complex and mod $p$ geometry of Shimura varieties and special cycles. We introduce the relative Cayley map and also establish Jacquet--Rallis transfers at maximal parahoric levels.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The basic locus of ramified unitary Shimura varieties of signature $(n-1,1)$ at maximal vertex level
Constructs Bruhat-Tits stratification for ramified unitary Rapoport-Zink space of signature (n-1,1) at vertex lattice level, proves normality, Cohen-Macaulayness and dimension formulas, and gives scheme-theoretic isom...
-
Quasi-canonical AFL and Arithmetic Transfer conjectures at parahoric levels
Authors formulate arithmetic transfer conjectures at parahoric levels, prove their graph versions via quasi-canonical AFL, relate some to prior Hecke algebra work, prove simple cases, and verify Kudla-Rapoport conject...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.