Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Constraints on transition redshift utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and comments on the Hubble tension

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims cosmic acceleration began near z ≈ 0.65 and that this is also the epoch where the Hubble tension starts.

desk verdict The paper's own method-dominance finding undermines its headline z_tr = 0.65±0.16, but the compilation and the sensitivity analysis are useful enough for a referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05389 v1 pith:LGIKRI5X submitted 2025-08-07 astro-ph.CO

Jianping Hu , Xuandong Jia , DaoHong Gao , Jiaze Gao , Baoquan Gao , Fayin Wang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO PACS 98.80.-k95.36.+x
keywords transitionredshiftcosmicaccelerationHubbleconstanttensionparameterH(z)LambdaCDMcosmographyGaussianprocessdarkenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a reliable value for the transition redshift—the cosmic epoch when the universe switched from decelerating to accelerating expansion—using the latest measurements of the Hubble parameter H(z). Combining 2004–2024 published constraints, it finds the full set is consistent with a Gaussian centered at $z_{\mathrm{tr}} = 0.65 \pm 0.16$, and a screened subset with free Hubble constant gives $0.64 \pm 0.16$. The paper also finds that the choice of method changes $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ more than the choice of dataset. Because these values overlap with the redshift at which $H_0$ estimates start to deviate from the Planck result, the paper suggests the Hubble tension may originate in this same transitional epoch.

What carries the argument

The central quantity is the transition redshift $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$, the redshift at which cosmic expansion changes from deceleration to acceleration. The argument is carried by a Gaussian fit to the distribution of $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ values reported across 2004–2024, together with a comparison of three reconstruction methods ($\Lambda$CDM, cosmography, Gaussian process) applied to current H(z) data; the fit supplies the numerical center $0.65\pm0.16$, and the method comparison explains why individual estimates scatter.

What would settle it

Recompute the mean of all published transition-redshift constraints without applying any screening, or apply a screening rule fixed before the compilation was assembled; if the resulting mean differs from $0.65\pm0.16$ (or from $0.64\pm0.16$ for the free-$H_0$ subset) by more than the quoted uncertainty, the claimed Gaussian description and its overlap with the $H_0$ onset fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the deceleration-to-acceleration transition can be pinned down statistically: the full collection of $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ constraints from 2004 to 2024 is well described by a Gaussian with mean 0.65 and standard deviation 0.16, and the screened free-$H_0$ subset gives $\bar{z}_{\mathrm{tr}}(\mathrm{free}) = 0.64 \pm 0.16$. The paper demonstrates with $\Lambda$CDM, cosmography, and Gaussian-process reconstructions that methodology, rather than the specific H(z) sample, is the dominant source of variation in reported $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ values. It then reads the coincidence between this transition epoch and the onset of $H_0$ evolution as evidence that the Hubble tension c

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the premise that the 'screened' constraints were chosen by objective, pre-defined rules and that the scatter of the compiled measurements behaves like Gaussian error around a single value; if the screening was decided after seeing the data, the reported mean could be a selection artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the compiled $z_{\mathrm{tr}}\approx0.65\pm0.16$ is real, the onset of cosmic acceleration is confined to a narrow redshift window rather than being a fuzzy, model-dependent era.
  • Because the paper finds methodology affects $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ more than the H(z) dataset, future claims of a shifted transition redshift must control for reconstruction method before invoking new physics.
  • The overlap with the redshift at which $H_0$ drifts from the Planck value suggests the Hubble tension may begin at the acceleration transition, focusing attention on $z\sim0.6$.
  • The free-$H_0$ screened constraints reproducing the full-sample mean (0.64 vs 0.65) indicates the central value is not an artifact of assuming a particular $H_0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This is a correlation, not a proven causal link; because both $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ and the apparent $H_0$ evolution are often derived from the same H(z) data, shared systematics could manufacture the overlap.
  • The paper does not spell out the screening rule for the free-$H_0$ subset; until that rule is published, $0.64\pm0.16$ should be read as provisional, and a reader could test the selection's objectivity by re-running the compilation with a pre-registered cutoff.
  • If the coincidence holds, a sharp dark-energy transition near $z_{\mathrm{tr}}$ becomes a concrete, testable alternative to smooth dark energy.
  • Independent tracers of the expansion rate at closely spaced redshifts around $z=0.6$ (for example, baryon acoustic oscillations) could localize the onset of the $H_0$ drift and directly test the claimed connection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper compiles published constraints on the transition redshift z_tr from 2004 to 2024, obtained with different methods (LambdaCDM, cosmography, Gaussian processes) and different H(z) datasets. It reports that, after statistical analysis, the total set of z_tr constraints is described by a Gaussian with mean 0.65 and standard deviation 0.16, and that a screened subset of constraints with free H0 gives a mean of 0.64 +/- 0.16. The paper further claims that these values overlap with the redshift at which the Hubble constant starts to deviate from the Planck value, suggesting a link between the transition epoch and the Hubble tension. The abstract explicitly states that the choice of method has a greater impact on z_tr than the observations themselves, which is central to the paper's methodological argument.

Significance. If the compiled mean z_tr is approximately 0.65 and robust, it would provide a useful empirical anchor for dark-energy models and a potentially interesting coincidence with the epoch at which the Hubble tension appears. The paper's strength is that it explicitly investigates the role of methodology and dataset, and it is honest in stating that method choice dominates. However, the central claim of a reliable mean is undermined by the paper's own admission of method-dominated estimates, by the undefined screening procedure, and by the questionable use of the standard deviation of compiled values as the uncertainty of the mean. The result is therefore not yet established; with clearly defined selection criteria, method-dependent breakdowns, and proper statistical treatment, the analysis could be made convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, first paragraph] The abstract states that 'the choice of method has a greater impact on z_tr than the observations themselves.' This directly undermines the central claim that a single Gaussian (mean 0.65, standard deviation 0.16) describes the total z_tr constraints. If methodological variation dominates, pooling constraints from LambdaCDM fits, cosmography, and Gaussian-process reconstructions pools method-dependent estimates of different effective quantities, not repeated measurements of one transition redshift. The reported scatter then reflects method choice and sample composition. The authors need to provide a method-by-method and dataset-by-dataset breakdown, showing that each method yields a consistent mean within uncertainties, or explicitly model method as a random effect. Without this, the pooled mean is not a robust consensus value.
  2. [Abstract, second paragraph] The 'screened' subset of z_tr constraints with free H0 is undefined. The abstract gives no criteria for inclusion or exclusion, how many constraints were excluded, or whether the screening was designed before inspecting the data. Because the paper uses this screened sample to claim z_bar_tr(free)=0.64+/-0.16 and then links this to the Hubble tension, a post-hoc selection correlated with the tension would create an artificial overlap. The authors must state the screening rule explicitly, list excluded studies with reasons, and show that alternative reasonable screening choices do not change the mean. The current presentation is insufficient to rule out selection bias.
  3. [Abstract, second paragraph] The reported uncertainty is the standard deviation of the compiled z_tr values (0.16), but it is presented as an uncertainty on the mean, as in z_bar_tr(all)=0.65+/-0.16. For heterogeneous, correlated estimates that often share the same H(z) compilations and priors, the standard deviation of the sample is not the uncertainty of the mean; independence and negligible individual errors are not established. A random-effects meta-analysis with between-study variance, or at least a standard error of the mean computed with a stated treatment of correlations, is required. The current statistic overstates precision and cannot support the subsequent astrophysical interpretation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The symbol 'z_ztr' appears to be a typographical error for 'z_tr'; please standardize notation throughout.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'initial moment of H0 evolution' is not defined operationally. Which observable, which redshift bin, and what deviation threshold from the Planck value are used? Please specify how this redshift is determined.
  3. [Abstract] The word 'Coincidentally' carries interpretive weight without statistical justification. If the overlap is to be claimed as meaningful, a quantitative comparison of the z_tr distribution with the H0-evolution onset redshift, including uncertainties, should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the compiled z_tr is a meta-analysis of external constraints, not a derivation from a self-defined target.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a statistical summary of previously published transition-redshift constraints: the abstract reports that the total 2004-2024 z_tr constraints are described by a Gaussian with mean 0.65 and standard deviation 0.16, and that a screened free-H0 subset gives 0.64 +/- 0.16. These are pooled estimates of externally determined quantities, not predictions generated from a model fitted within this paper. No equation in the provided text defines z_tr in terms of the final mean, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The abstract's statement that 'the choice of method has a greater impact on z_tr than the observations themselves' is a potential validity problem for pooling heterogeneous method-dependent estimates into one Gaussian, and the undefined 'screened' subset raises a selection-transparency concern. However, those are statistical or methodological weaknesses, not circularity: the paper does not assume the conclusion in its inputs, nor does it rely on a self-citation chain to justify the result. Any concern about post-hoc screening would require evidence of the screening rule being defined after seeing the data, which is not available in the provided text. Therefore the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard cosmological modeling assumptions and a meta-analytic framework. No new entities are introduced. The key unstated assumptions concern the screening procedure and the statistical combination of published values.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The LambdaCDM model provides a valid description of the background expansion for estimating transition redshift.
    The abstract says the paper uses the LambdaCDM model to constrain z_tr; this assumes the model is correct.
  • domain assumption Cosmography, the Taylor expansion of the scale factor, is a valid approximation over the redshift range considered.
    The abstract lists cosmography as one of the methods, which requires convergence of the expansion.
  • domain assumption Gaussian process regression provides an unbiased reconstruction of H(z) and its derivatives.
    The method relies on the choice of kernel and smoothness prior, which are not described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The published z_tr constraints from 2004 to 2024 are independent and can be combined by a simple Gaussian distribution.
    The abstract states the constraints are well described by a Gaussian, but does not justify the independence or ignore individual errors.
  • domain assumption The 'initial moment of H0 evolution' is a well-defined epoch that is independent of the z_tr constraints.
    The abstract claims an overlap with this epoch without defining how it is measured or whether it is derived from the same data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraints on transition redshift utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and comments on the Hubble tension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LGIKRI5X

@misc{pith2026250805389,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraints on transition redshift utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and comments on the Hubble tension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LGIKRI5X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05389}
}
abstract

The motivation of this paper is to obtain reliable constraints of transition redshift ($z_{ztr}$) and, in combination with the evolution of the Hubble constant ($H_{0}$) that could alleviate the Hubble tension, discuss the possible origin of the tension. Utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and different methods ($\Lambda$CDM model, Cosmography, and Gaussian process method), we investigated the impact of methodology and dataset on $z_{ztr}$ constraints, and find that the choice of method has a greater impact on $z_{tr}$ than the observations themselves. Through a statistical analysis of the $z_{ztr}$ constraints from 2004 to 2024, we find that total $z_{tr}$ constraints (2004$-$2024) can be well described by a Gaussian function with the mean value 0.65 and the standard deviation 0.16; that is, $\bar{z}_{tr}$(all) = 0.65 $\pm$ 0.16. And we confirmed that both dataset and methodology can indeed significantly affect the final constraints. The screened $z_{tr}$ constraints with free $H_{0}$ gives a new result $\bar{z}_{tr}$(free) = 0.64 $\pm$ 0.16. Coincidentally, the $z_{tr}$ results overlap with the initial moment of $H_{0}$ evolution ($H_{0}$ value starts to deviate from the Planck result). This may suggest that the Hubble tension might be closely related to this particular period in the evolution of the Universe.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

187 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Abbott T. M. C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.171301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhRvL.122q1301A 122, 171301

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.171301 2019

  3. [3]

    Abbott T. M. C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973L..14A 973, L14

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f 2024

  4. [4]

    Abdalla E., et al., 2022, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JHEAp..34...49A 34, 49

    doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 2022

  5. [5]

    G., et al., 2025a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...01..124A 2025, 124

    Adame A. G., et al., 2025a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...01..124A 2025, 124

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/124 2025

  6. [6]

    G., et al., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...02..021A 2025, 021

    Adame A. G., et al., 2025b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...02..021A 2025, 021

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2025

  7. [7]

    G., et al., 2025c, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...04..012A 2025, 012

    Adame A. G., et al., 2025c, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...04..012A 2025, 012

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/012 2025

  8. [8]

    Alam S., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx721 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.2617A 470, 2617

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 2017

Show all 187 references
  1. [9]

    Anderson L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu523 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441...24A 441, 24

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    Arjona R., Nesseris S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063537 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021PhRvD.103f3537A 103, 063537

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Banik I., Kalaitzidis V., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.540..545B 540, 545

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    Bargiacchi G., Risaliti G., Benetti M., Capozziello S., Lusso E., Saccardi A., Signorini M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140386 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..65B 649, A65

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Benetti M., Capozziello S., Lambiase G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3368 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1795B 500, 1795

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Bengaly C. A. P., Alcaniz J. S., Pigozzo C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123533 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.109l3533B 109, 123533

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Blake C., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21473.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425..405B 425, 405

    2012

  8. [16]

    Borghi N., Moresco M., Cimatti A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac3fb2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928L...4B 928, L4

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    Boubel P., Colless M., Said K., Staveley-Smith L., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...03..066B 2025, 066

    2025 doi

  10. [18]

    L., Mifsud J., Saridakis E

    Briffa R., Capozziello S., Said J. L., Mifsud J., Saridakis E. N., 2020, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/1361-6382/abd4f5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020CQGra..38e5007B 38, 055007

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Brout D., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...938..110B 938, 110

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    G., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552A..96B 552, A96

    Busca N. G., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552A..96B 552, A96

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    N., 2016, @doi [Reports on Progress in Physics] 10.1088/0034-4885/79/10/106901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RPPh...79j6901C 79, 106901

    Cai Y.-F., Capozziello S., De Laurentis M., Saridakis E. N., 2016, @doi [Reports on Progress in Physics] 10.1088/0034-4885/79/10/106901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RPPh...79j6901C 79, 106901

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    Cao S., Khadka N., Ratra B., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.2928C 510, 2928

    doi

  15. [23]

    Cao S., Dainotti M., Ratra B., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac517 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512..439C 512, 439

    doi

  16. [24]

    A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4484C 484, 4484

    Capozziello S., Ruchika Sen A. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz176 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4484C 484, 4484

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Capozziello S., de Laurentis M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhR...509..167C 509, 167

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    Capozziello S., Lazkoz R., Salzano V., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.124061 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PhRvD..84l4061C 84, 124061

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    Capozziello S., Farooq O., Luongo O., Ratra B., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044016 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvD..90d4016C 90, 044016

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvD..91l4037C 91, 124037

    Capozziello S., Luongo O., Saridakis E. N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.124037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvD..91l4037C 91, 124037

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    Capozziello S., D'Agostino R., Luongo O., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.3924C 476, 3924

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    Capozziello S., D'Agostino R., Luongo O., 2019, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271819300167 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019IJMPD..2830016C 28, 1930016

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    Capozziello S., Benetti M., Spallicci A. D. A. M., 2020a, @doi [Foundations of Physics] 10.1007/s10701-020-00356-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020FoPh...50..893C 50, 893

    doi

  24. [32]

    Capozziello S., D'Agostino R., Luongo O., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa871 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.2576C 494, 2576

    doi

  25. [33]

    Capozziello S., Dunsby P. K. S., Luongo O., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3187 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.5399C 509, 5399

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Capozziello S., Sarracino G., De Somma G., 2024, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe10030140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Univ...10..140C 10, 140

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Catto \"e n C., Visser M., 2007, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/0264-9381/24/23/018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CQGra..24.5985C 24, 5985

    2007 doi

  28. [36]

    F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534..544C 534, 544

    Chen S. F., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.534..544C 534, 544

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Chuang C.-H., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt988 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.3559C 433, 3559

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    M., Grojean C., Servant G., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4245 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PhRvL..83.4245C 83, 4245

    Cline J. M., Grojean C., Servant G., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4245 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PhRvL..83.4245C 83, 4245

    1999 doi

  31. [39]

    \'O ., Sheikh-Jabbari M

    Colg \'a in E. \'O ., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.12905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241212905C p. arXiv:2412.12905

    2024 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    V., Lima J

    Cunha J. V., Lima J. A. S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13640.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390..210C 390, 210

    2008

  33. [41]

    G., De Simone B., Schiavone T., Montani G., Rinaldi E., Lambiase G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abeb73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912..150D 912, 150

    Dainotti M. G., De Simone B., Schiavone T., Montani G., Rinaldi E., Lambiase G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abeb73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912..150D 912, 150

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    G., De Simone B

    Dainotti M. G., De Simone B. D., Schiavone T., Montani G., Rinaldi E., Lambiase G., Bogdan M., Ugale S., 2022, @doi [Galaxies] 10.3390/galaxies10010024 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Galax..10...24D 10, 24

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    G., Lenart A

    Dainotti M. G., Lenart A. ., Chraya A., Sarracino G., Nagataki S., Fraija N., Capozziello S., Bogdan M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2752 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.2201D 518, 2201

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    G., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250111772D p

    Dainotti M. G., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.11772 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250111772D p. arXiv:2501.11772

    2025 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    M., 1994, @doi [General Relativity and Gravitation] 10.1007/BF02106709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994GReGr..26.1171D 26, 1171

    Damour T., Polyakov A. M., 1994, @doi [General Relativity and Gravitation] 10.1007/BF02106709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994GReGr..26.1171D 26, 1171

    1994 doi

  38. [46]

    S., White S

    Davis M., Efstathiou G., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...292..371D 292, 371

    1985 doi

  39. [47]

    De Simone B., van Putten M. H. P. M., Dainotti M. G., Lambiase G., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.05744 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241105744D p. arXiv:2411.05744

    2024 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    Delubac T., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...574A..59D 574, A59

    2015 doi

  41. [49]

    Di Valentino E., et al., 2021, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021CQGra..38o3001D 38, 153001

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    S ., Deliduman C., Binici S

    Dilsiz F. S ., Deliduman C., Binici S. S., 2025, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101943 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025PDU....4801943D 48, 101943

    2025

  43. [51]

    Dunsby P. K. S., Luongo O., 2016, @doi [International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics] 10.1142/S0219887816300026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016IJGMM..1330002D 13, 1630002

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    J., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/466512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...633..560E 633, 560

    Eisenstein D. J., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/466512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...633..560E 633, 560

    2005 doi

  45. [53]

    J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/3/72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...72E 142, 72

    Eisenstein D. J., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/3/72 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...72E 142, 72

    2011 doi

  46. [54]

    Enqvist K., 2008, @doi [General Relativity and Gravitation] 10.1007/s10714-007-0553-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008GReGr..40..451E 40, 451

    2008 doi

  47. [55]

    Escamilla L. A., Fiorucci D., Montani G., Di Valentino E., 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101652 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4601652E 46, 101652

    2024

  48. [56]

    Farooq O., Ratra B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766L...7F 766, L7

    2013 doi

  49. [57]

    Farooq O., Crandall S., Ratra B., 2013a, @doi [Physics Letters B] 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhLB..726...72F 726, 72

    2013 doi

  50. [58]

    Farooq O., Mania D., Ratra B., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..138F 764, 138

    doi

  51. [59]

    Farooq O., Ranjeet Madiyar F., Crandall S., Ratra B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...26F 835, 26

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    G., G \'o mez-Valent A., Migliaccio M., 2024, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2024.10.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JHEAp..44..323F 44, 323

    Favale A., Dainotti M. G., G \'o mez-Valent A., Migliaccio M., 2024, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2024.10.010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JHEAp..44..323F 44, 323

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    Firmani C., Ghisellini G., Ghirlanda G., Avila-Reese V., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00023.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.360L...1F 360, L1

    2005

  54. [62]

    Font-Ribera A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014JCAP...05..027F 2014, 027

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/670067 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125..306F 125, 306

    2013 doi

  56. [64]

    Gao J., Zhou Z., Du M., Zou R., Hu J., Xu L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.7861G 527, 7861

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    H., Wu Q., Hu J

    Gao D. H., Wu Q., Hu J. P., Yi S. X., Zhou X., Wang F. Y., Dai Z. G., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202453006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...698A.215G 698, A215

    2025 doi

  58. [66]

    Garcia-Bellido J., Haugb lle T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008JCAP...04..003G 2008, 003

    2008 doi

  59. [67]

    Gazta \ n aga E., Cabr \'e A., Hui L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15405.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.399.1663G 399, 1663

    2009

  60. [68]

    T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JCAP...10..035G 2024, 035

    Giar \`e W., Najafi M., Pan S., Di Valentino E., Firouzjaee J. T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JCAP...10..035G 2024, 035

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    G \'o mez-Valent A., Amendola L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018JCAP...04..051G 2018, 051

    2018 doi

  62. [70]

    A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.109b3525G 109, 023525

    G \'o mez-Valent A., Favale A., Migliaccio M., Sen A. A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.109b3525G 109, 023525

    2024 doi

  63. [71]

    Guimar \ a es A. C. C., Cunha J. V., Lima J. A. S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/010 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009JCAP...10..010G 2009, 010

    2009 doi

  64. [72]

    V., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.124036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvD..88l4036G 88, 124036

    Guo J.-Q., Frolov A. V., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.124036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvD..88l4036G 88, 124036

    2013 doi

  65. [73]

    S., Lukovi \'c V

    Haridasu B. S., Lukovi \'c V. V., Moresco M., Vittorio N., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/015 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018JCAP...10..015H 2018, 015

    2018 doi

  66. [74]

    J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..34H 668, A34

    Horstmann N., Pietschke Y., Schwarz D. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142640 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A..34H 668, A34

    2022 doi

  67. [75]

    P., Wang F

    Hu J. P., Wang F. Y., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517..576H 517, 576

    doi

  68. [76]

    P., Wang F

    Hu J. P., Wang F. Y., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A..71H 661, A71

    doi

  69. [77]

    Hu J.-P., Wang F.-Y., 2023, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe9020094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Univ....9...94H 9, 94

    2023 doi

  70. [78]

    P., Wang F

    Hu J. P., Wang F. Y., Dai Z. G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2180 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507..730H 507, 730

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    P., Wang Y

    Hu J. P., Wang Y. Y., Hu J., Wang F. Y., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..88H 681, A88

    doi

  72. [80]

    P., Hu J., Jia X

    Hu J. P., Hu J., Jia X. D., Gao B. Q., Wang F. Y., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450342 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.215H 689, A215

    doi

  73. [81]

    P., Jia X

    Hu J. P., Jia X. D., Hu J., Wang F. Y., 2024c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad85cf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975L..36H 975, L36

    doi

  74. [82]

    F., Holanda R

    Jesus J. F., Holanda R. F. L., Pereira S. H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018JCAP...05..073J 2018, 073

    2018 doi

  75. [83]

    F., Valentim R., Escobal A

    Jesus J. F., Valentim R., Escobal A. A., Pereira S. H., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020JCAP...04..053J 2020, 053

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    D., Hu J

    Jia X. D., Hu J. P., Yang J., Zhang B. B., Wang F. Y., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.2575J 516, 2575

    2022 doi

  77. [85]

    D., Hu J

    Jia X. D., Hu J. P., Wang F. Y., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..45J 674, A45

    2023 doi

  78. [86]

    D., Hu J

    Jia X. D., Hu J. P., Yi S. X., Wang F. Y., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ada94d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979L..34J 979, L34

    2025 doi

  79. [87]

    Jiao K., Borghi N., Moresco M., Zhang T.-J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/acbc77 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJS..265...48J 265, 48

    2023 doi

  80. [88]

    Jimenez R., Loeb A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340549 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...573...37J 573, 37

    2002 doi

  81. [89]

    D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JCAP...11..047J 2023, 047

    Jimenez R., Moresco M., Verde L., Wandelt B. D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023JCAP...11..047J 2023, 047

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    Kalbouneh B., Marinoni C., Maartens R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2024/09/069 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JCAP...09..069K 2024, 069

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    Kalbouneh B., Santiago J., Marinoni C., Maartens R., Clarkson C., Sarma M., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/076 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...02..076K 2025, 076

    2025 doi

  84. [92]

    C., Barger A

    Keenan R. C., Barger A. J., Cowie L. L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/62 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775...62K 775, 62

    2013 doi

  85. [93]

    Komatsu E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..192...18K 192, 18

    2011 doi

  86. [94]

    Koussour M., Myrzakulov N., Ali M. K. M., 2024, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2024.04.003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024JHEAp..42...96K 42, 96

    2024 doi

  87. [95]

    \'O ., Ruchika A

    Krishnan C., Colg \'a in E. \'O ., Ruchika A. A. S., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., Yang T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.102j3525K 102, 103525

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    \'O ., Sheikh-Jabbari M

    Krishnan C., Mohayaee R., Colg \'a in E. \'O ., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., Yin L., 2021, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/1361-6382/ac1a81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021CQGra..38r4001K 38, 184001

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    Kroupa P., et al., 2023, in School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity. p. 231 ( @eprint arXiv 2309.11552 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2309.11552

    2023 doi arXiv

  90. [98]

    Kumar D., Jain D., Mahajan S., Mukherjee A., Rana A., 2023, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics D] 10.1142/S0218271823500396 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023IJMPD..3250039K 32, 2350039

    2023 doi

  91. [99]

    Li E.-K., Du M., Xu L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3308 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.4960L 491, 4960

    2020 doi

  92. [100]

    Li Z., Zhang B., Liang N., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad838 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.4406L 521, 4406

    2023 doi

  93. [101]

    Liang E., Zhang B., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/491594 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...633..611L 633, 611

    2005 doi

  94. [102]

    Liang N., Li Z., Xie X., Wu P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca08a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...941...84L 941, 84

    2022 doi

  95. [103]

    E., Linder E

    Liao K., Shafieloo A., Keeley R. E., Linder E. V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5308 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886L..23L 886, L23

    2019 doi

  96. [104]

    Liu Y., Liang N., Xie X., Yuan Z., Yu H., Wu P., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7de5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935....7L 935, 7

    2022 doi

  97. [105]

    Liu Y., Yu H., Wu P., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L021304 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvD.110b1304L 110, L021304

    doi

  98. [106]

    Liu Y., Wang B., Yu H., Wu P., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1808 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533..244L 533, 244

    doi

  99. [107]

    Lopez-Hernandez M., De-Santiago J., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/026 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025JCAP...03..026L 2025, 026

    2025 doi

  100. [108]

    arXiv:2412.18493

    Luongo O., Muccino M., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2412.18493 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241218493L p. arXiv:2412.18493

    2024 doi

  101. [109]

    Lusso E., Piedipalumbo E., Risaliti G., Paolillo M., Bisogni S., Nardini E., Amati L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936223 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628L...4L 628, L4

    2019 doi

  102. [110]

    M., 2024, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12667-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024EPJC...84..317M 84, 317

    Malekjani M., Mc Conville R., \'O Colg \'a in E., Pourojaghi S., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., 2024, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12667-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024EPJC...84..317M 84, 317

    2024 doi

  103. [111]

    Mazurenko S., Banik I., Kroupa P., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2758 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.3232M 536, 3232

    2025 doi

  104. [112]

    K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018JCAP...02..034M 2018, 034

    Melia F., Yennapureddy M. K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018JCAP...02..034M 2018, 034

    2018 doi

  105. [113]

    Milgrom M., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...270..365M 270, 365

    1983 doi

  106. [114]

    Millon M., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937351 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...639A.101M 639, A101

    2020 doi

  107. [115]

    S., Kavya N

    Mishra S. S., Kavya N. S., Sahoo P. K., Venkatesha V., 2025, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025PDU....4701759M 47, 101759

    2025

  108. [117]

    A., Di Valentino E., 2025b, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101848 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025PDU....4801848M 48, 101848

    Montani G., Carlevaro N., Escamilla L. A., Di Valentino E., 2025b, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2025.101848 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025PDU....4801848M 48, 101848

    2025

  109. [118]

    Moresco M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450L..16M 450, L16

    2015 doi

  110. [119]

    Moresco M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JCAP...08..006M 2012, 006

    2012 doi

  111. [120]

    Moresco M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/05/014 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016JCAP...05..014M 2016, 014

    2016 doi

  112. [121]

    Moresco M., Jimenez R., Verde L., Cimatti A., Pozzetti L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9eb0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...82M 898, 82

    2020 doi

  113. [122]

    Moresco M., et al., 2022, @doi [Living Reviews in Relativity] 10.1007/s41114-022-00040-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022LRR....25....6M 25, 6

    2022 doi

  114. [123]

    Muccino M., Luongo O., Jain D., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1760 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.4938M 523, 4938

    2023 doi

  115. [124]

    Myrzakulov R., 2011, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1752-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011EPJC...71.1752M 71, 1752

    2011 doi

  116. [125]

    Myrzakulov Y., Donmez O., Koussour M., Alizhanov D., Bekchanov S., Rayimbaev J., 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4601614M 46, 101614

    2024

  117. [126]

    Nakamura T., Chiba T., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02551.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.306..696N 306, 696

    1999

  118. [127]

    Neveux R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2780 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499..210N 499, 210

    2020 doi

  119. [128]

    M., Solomon R., Bargiacchi G., Capozziello S., Dainotti M

    \'O Colg \'a in E., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., Solomon R., Bargiacchi G., Capozziello S., Dainotti M. G., Stojkovic D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L041301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhRvD.106d1301O 106, L041301

    2022 doi

  120. [129]

    M., Solomon R., Dainotti M

    \'O Colg \'a in E., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., Solomon R., Dainotti M. G., Stojkovic D., 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101464 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4401464O 44, 101464

    2024

  121. [130]

    Colg \'a in E., Pourojaghi S., Sheikh-Jabbari M

    \'O . Colg \'a in E., Pourojaghi S., Sheikh-Jabbari M. M., Sherwin D., 2025, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13727-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025EPJC...85..124O 85, 124

    2025 doi

  122. [131]

    M., Wesson P

    Overduin J. M., Wesson P. S., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00046-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997PhR...283..303O 283, 303

    1997 doi

  123. [132]

    Padmanabhan T., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00120-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PhR...380..235P 380, 235

    2003 doi

  124. [133]

    arXiv:2501.03480

    Park C.-G., Ratra B., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.03480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250103480P p. arXiv:2501.03480

    2025 doi arXiv

  125. [134]

    Pedregosa F., et al., 2011, @doi [Journal of Machine Learning Research] 10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011JMLR...12.2825P 12, 2825

    2011 doi arXiv

  126. [135]

    J., Ratra B., 2003, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003RvMP...75..559P 75, 559

    Peebles P. J., Ratra B., 2003, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003RvMP...75..559P 75, 559

    2003 doi

  127. [136]

    Perivolaropoulos L., Skara F., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NewAR..9501659P 95, 101659

    2022

  128. [137]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...571A..16P 571, A16

    2014 doi

  129. [139]

    Planck Collaboration et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...641A...6P 641, A6

    doi

  130. [140]

    Pourojaghi S., Malekjani M., Davari Z., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537..436P 537, 436

    2025 doi

  131. [141]

    Rahman S. F. u., 2023, @doi [Gravitation and Cosmology] 10.1134/S020228932302010X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023GrCo...29..177R 29, 177

    2023 doi

  132. [142]

    Randall L., Sundrum R., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4690 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PhRvL..83.4690R 83, 4690

    1999 doi

  133. [143]

    Rani N., Jain D., Mahajan S., Mukherjee A., Pires N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/045 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JCAP...12..045R 2015, 045

    2015 doi

  134. [144]

    E., Williams C

    Rasmussen C. E., Williams C. K. I., 2006, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning

    2006

  135. [145]

    L., Loubser S

    Ratsimbazafy A. L., Loubser S. I., Crawford S. M., Cress C. M., Bassett B. A., Nichol R. C., V \"a is \"a nen P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx301 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.3239R 467, 3239

    2017 doi

  136. [146]

    G., Breuval L., 2024, in de Grijs R., Whitelock P

    Riess A. G., Breuval L., 2024, in de Grijs R., Whitelock P. A., Catelan M., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 376, IAU Symposium. pp 15--29 ( @eprint arXiv 2308.10954 ), @doi 10.1017/S1743921323003034

    2024 arXiv

  137. [147]

    G., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.1009R 116, 1009

    Riess A. G., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300499 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.1009R 116, 1009

    1998 doi

  138. [148]

    G., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...607..665R 607, 665

    Riess A. G., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/383612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...607..665R 607, 665

    2004 doi

  139. [149]

    G., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510378 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659...98R 659, 98

    Riess A. G., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/510378 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659...98R 659, 98

    2007 doi

  140. [150]

    G., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730..119R 730, 119

    Riess A. G., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/119 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...730..119R 730, 119

    2011 doi

  141. [151]

    G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934L...7R 934, L7

    Riess A. G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...934L...7R 934, L7

    2022 doi

  142. [152]

    Roos M., 2012, @doi [Journal of Modern Physics] 10.4236/jmp.2012.329150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JMPh....3.1152R 3, 1152

    2012

  143. [153]

    arXiv:2311.12098

    Rubin D., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2311.12098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231112098R p. arXiv:2311.12098

    2023 doi arXiv

  144. [154]

    arXiv:2411.10838

    Sah A., Rameez M., Sarkar S., Tsagas C., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2411.10838 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241110838S p. arXiv:2411.10838

    2024 doi arXiv

  145. [155]

    Salehi A., Hatami H., 2022, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11105-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022EPJC...82.1165S 82, 1165

    2022 doi

  146. [156]

    A., Nunes R

    Scherer M., Sabogal M. A., Nunes R. C., De Felice A., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.20664 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250420664S p. arXiv:2504.20664

    2025 doi arXiv

  147. [157]

    Schulz E., Speekenbrink M., Krause A., 2018, @doi [Journal of Mathematical Psychology] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.03.001 , 85, 1

    2018 doi

  148. [158]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..101S 859, 101

    Scolnic D. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..101S 859, 101

    2018 doi

  149. [159]

    Seikel M., Clarkson C., Smith M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/06/036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012JCAP...06..036S 2012, 036

    2012 doi

  150. [160]

    Cambridge Univ

    Silk J., et al., 2010, Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches . Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, @doi 10.1017/CBO9780511770739

    2010 doi

  151. [161]

    Simon J., Verde L., Jimenez R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.71.123001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PhRvD..71l3001S 71, 123001

    2005 doi

  152. [162]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....146...32S 146, 32

    Smee S. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/146/2/32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AJ....146...32S 146, 32

    2013 doi

  153. [163]

    S., Venkatesha V., 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101522 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4501522S 45, 101522

    Sudharani L., Bamba K., Kavya N. S., Venkatesha V., 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101522 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4501522S 45, 101522

    2024

  154. [165]

    Tomasetti E., et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346992 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...679A..96T 679, A96

    doi

  155. [166]

    Vagnozzi S., 2023, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe9090393 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Univ....9..393V 9, 393

    2023 doi

  156. [167]

    M., Fabris J

    Velasquez-Toribio A. M., Fabris J. C., 2022, @doi [Brazilian Journal of Physics] 10.1007/s13538-022-01113-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022BrJPh..52..115V 52, 115

    2022 doi

  157. [168]

    M., Magnago A

    Velasquez-Toribio A. M., Magnago A. d. R., 2020, @doi [European Physical Journal C] 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8120-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020EPJC...80..562V 80, 562

    2020 doi

  158. [169]

    Visser M., 2004, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/0264-9381/21/11/006 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004CQGra..21.2603V 21, 2603

    2004 doi

  159. [170]

    Visser M., 2015, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/0264-9381/32/13/135007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015CQGra..32m5007V 32, 135007

    2015 doi

  160. [171]

    S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.061502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PhRvD..86f1502V 86, 061502

    Volkov M. S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.061502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PhRvD..86f1502V 86, 061502

    2012 doi

  161. [172]

    Y., Dai Z

    Wang F. Y., Dai Z. G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10108.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.368..371W 368, 371

    2006

  162. [173]

    Y., Dai Z

    Wang F. Y., Dai Z. G., 2013, @doi [Nature Physics] 10.1038/nphys2670 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NatPh...9..465W 9, 465

    2013 doi

  163. [174]

    Y., Dai Z

    Wang F. Y., Dai Z. G., Liang E. W., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2015.03.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NewAR..67....1W 67, 1

    2015 doi

  164. [175]

    Wang B., Abdalla E., Atrio-Barandela F., Pav \'o n D., 2016, @doi [Reports on Progress in Physics] 10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096901 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016RPPh...79i6901W 79, 096901

    2016 doi

  165. [176]

    Wang Y., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.3762W 469, 3762

    2017 doi

  166. [177]

    Y., Hu J

    Wang F. Y., Hu J. P., Zhang G. Q., Dai Z. G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3755 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...924...97W 924, 97

    2022 doi

  167. [178]

    Wang B., L \'o pez-Corredoira M., Wei J.-J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.7692W 527, 7692

    2024 doi

  168. [179]

    Weinberg S., 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, by Steven Weinberg, pp. 688. ISBN 0-471-92567-5. Wiley-VCH , July 1972

    1972

  169. [180]

    Weinberg S., 1989, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989RvMP...61....1W 61, 1

    1989 doi

  170. [181]

    C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.1420W 498, 1420

    Wong K. C., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3094 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.1420W 498, 1420

    2020 doi

  171. [182]

    Wu Q., Zhang G.-Q., Wang F.-Y., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slac022 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515L...1W 515, L1

    2022 doi

  172. [183]

    Xu L., Li W., Lu J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/07/031 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009JCAP...07..031X 2009, 031

    2009 doi

  173. [184]

    Xu B., Xu J., Zhang K., Fu X., Huang Q., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.5091X 530, 5091

    2024 doi

  174. [185]

    Yadav V., 2023, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023PDU....4201365Y 42, 101365

    2023

  175. [186]

    K., Rajpal 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4601626Y 46, 101626

    Yadav V., Yadav S. K., Rajpal 2024, @doi [Physics of the Dark Universe] 10.1016/j.dark.2024.101626 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PDU....4601626Y 46, 101626

    2024

  176. [187]

    N., 2024, @doi [Science Bulletin] 10.1016/j.scib.2024.07.029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024SciBu..69.2698Y 69, 2698

    Yang Y., Ren X., Wang Q., Lu Z., Zhang D., Cai Y.-F., Saridakis E. N., 2024, @doi [Science Bulletin] 10.1016/j.scib.2024.07.029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024SciBu..69.2698Y 69, 2698

    2024 doi

  177. [188]

    Yu H., Ratra B., Wang F.-Y., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856....3Y 856, 3

    2018 doi

  178. [189]

    Zhang C., Zhang H., Yuan S., Liu S., Zhang T.-J., Sun Y.-C., 2014, @doi [Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1088/1674-4527/14/10/002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014RAA....14.1221Z 14, 1221

    2014 doi

  179. [190]

    du Mas des Bourboux H., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731731 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...608A.130D 608, A130

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.