Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 8 minor 40 references

Classification of locally standard torus actions

T0 review · 1 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Locally standard torus actions are classified by a decorated quotient triple: a manifold-with-corners, a unimodular labelling, and a Chern class.

desk verdict Complete classification of locally standard torus actions by decorated quotients plus Chern class, with existence and functoriality; the argument is long but holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15004 v1 pith:LHPQKKGH submitted 2025-07-20 math.GT math.SG

Yael Karshon , Shintaro Kuroki This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GTmath.SG MSC 57S1257S25
keywords locallystandardtorusactionsequivariantdiffeomorphismclassificationmanifoldswithcornersunimodularlabellingChernclassofprincipalbundlescuttingfunctorsimultaneoustoricradialblowup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Locally standard torus actions are smooth actions of a torus $T$ on a manifold $M$ whose local model is a coordinatewise rotation on $\mathbb{C}^n \times T^l \times \mathbb{R}^m$. The paper's claim is that such an action is determined, up to equivariant diffeomorphism, by three pieces of data attached to the quotient $Q = M/T$: the structure of $Q$ as a manifold-with-corners, a unimodular labelling $\hat{\lambda}$ that records which circle subgroup of $T$ stabilizes the points over each codimension-one stratum, and a Chern class $c \in H^2(Q; t_{\mathbb{Z}})$ that records how the action twists over the interior of $Q$. The classification is two-sided: every decoration-preserving diffeomorphism of quotients lifts to a $T$-equivariant diffeomorphism, and every decorated triple arises from some locally standard $T$-manifold. The proof reduces the problem to the classical classification of principal $T$-bundles by Chern classes, via an equivalence of categories between locally standard $T$-manifolds and principal bundles over decorated manifolds-with-corners. This matters because the family includes principal bundles and locally toric manifolds, and the result removes earlier assumptions such as the existence of a continuous section.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a pair of functors. The cutting functor sends a principal $T$-bundle over a decorated manifold-with-corners $(Q, \hat{\lambda})$ to the locally standard $T$-manifold obtained by collapsing, over each point $x \in Q$, the fibre along the subtorus $T(x)$ that the labelling assigns to $x$; it is adapted from symplectic cutting. The simultaneous toric radial blowup functor sends a locally standard $T$-manifold $M$ to the principal $T$-bundle obtained by replacing every toric divisor $M_{\hat{\eta}}$ simultaneously by its radial sphere bundle, over the same quotient $Q$. The technical heart is two local-model statements: equivariant diffeomorphisms of the bundle models descend to diffeomorphisms of the cut models (Proposition 9.3), and equivariant diffeomorphisms of the manifold models lift to diffeomorphisms of the blown-up models (Proposition 12.6). These are proved using a division lemma for smooth functions vanishing on a coordinate hyperplane and the positivity of the factors $h_j$ in Eq. (9.4), and they are what give the cut and blown-up spaces their smooth structures.

What would settle it

Check the transition maps between the charts of the simultaneous toric radial blowup for a concrete locally standard $T$-manifold, such as the $S^2 \times T^{d-1}$ example with quotient $[-1,1]$: along the two facets the blowup charts should glue by diffeomorphisms whose $h_j$ factors are strictly positive, and finding a facet-preserving equivariant diffeomorphism of the models with a vanishing factor $h_j$ on the facet $\{s_j=0\}$ would break Proposition 9.3, the cutting functor, and the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 3.15: the quotient functor from locally standard $T$-manifolds to decorated manifolds-with-corners is full and essentially surjective. For locally standard $T$-manifolds $M_1$ and $M_2$, every diffeomorphism $\psi : M_1/T \to M_2/T$ that intertwines the unimodular labellings and pulls back the Chern class $c_{M_2}$ to $c_{M_1}$ is induced by a $T$-equivariant diffeomorphism $\widetilde{\psi} : M_1 \to M_2$, and every triple $(Q, \hat{\lambda}, c)$ with $Q$ a manifold-with-corners, $\hat{\lambda}$ a unimodular labelling of the depth-one stratum, and $c \in H^2(Q; t_{\mathbb{Z}})$ is realized by some locally standard $T$-manifold. The proof establishes an equivalence of categories $\mathbf{P}^{\mathrm{iso}} \cong \mathbf{M}^{\mathrm{iso}}$ between principal $T$-bundles over decorated manifolds-with-corners and locally standard $T$-manifolds, so the classical classification of principal bundles by Chern classes becomes the classification of the singular actions after cutting and blowing up.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the local smoothness lemmas are correct: the cutting and blowup functors are well-defined only if facet-preserving equivariant diffeomorphisms of the bundle and cut models descend and lift as diffeomorphisms, with positivity of the factors $h_j$ in Eq. (9.4) controlling smoothness at the corners, and the paper itself flags that the analogous lemma in the earlier work [38] had a proof gap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every locally standard $T$-manifold is determined up to equivariant diffeomorphism by $(Q, \hat{\lambda}, c)$; no additional choice, such as a continuous section of $M \to Q$, is part of the classification data.
  • Any decoration-preserving diffeomorphism of quotients lifts, so the map from equivariant diffeomorphism classes to decorated-quotient classes is one-to-one.
  • Any decorated triple is realized, so existence questions for locally standard actions reduce to finding a manifold-with-corners with a unimodular labelling and choosing an arbitrary class in $H^2(Q; t_{\mathbb{Z}})$.
  • Restricting to one-dimensional quotients recovers a concrete list: a connected locally standard $T$-manifold with one-dimensional quotient is equivariantly diffeomorphic to exactly one of the six models of Section 2, with the boundary labels determining which.
  • The equivalence with principal $T$-bundles makes the classical Chern-class classification transfer verbatim: principal bundles are the special case where the labelling is empty and $Q$ is a manifold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the proof uses only the abelian structure of the acting group and the existence of local weight coordinates, the same cutting and blowup functors may classify locally standard actions of other compact abelian groups, or actions modelled on more general representations with the same local normal form.
  • The full-and-essentially-surjective formulation suggests the classification should survive with morphisms weaker than diffeomorphisms: replacing them by local diffeomorphisms would turn the result into a statement about germs of locally standard actions near each orbit type, a direction the paper says it expects to develop.
  • The simultaneous radial blowup is a transfer tool: because it leaves the quotient unchanged, it converts a singular torus action into a principal bundle over the same quotient, so any invariant of principal bundles can be pulled back to invariants of locally standard actions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper gives a complete classification of locally standard smooth torus actions up to equivariant diffeomorphism. For a fixed torus T, a locally standard T-manifold M is associated with a decorated manifold-with-corners (Q, λ̂, c), where Q=M/T, λ̂ is a unimodular labelling determined by the isotropy representations along the depth-one stratum, and c∈H²(Q;t_Z) is the Chern class of the free part. The main theorem states that this invariant is complete and that every admissible triple is realized. The proof is organized as an equivalence of categories: a category Piso of principal T-bundles over decorated manifolds-with-corners is shown to be equivalent, via a cutting functor and a simultaneous toric radial blowup functor, to the category Miso of locally standard T-manifolds. The paper also recovers and extends results of Wiemeler and Davis and gives an explicit classification when M/T is one-dimensional.

Significance. This is a definitive structural result for locally standard torus actions, removing Wiemeler's standing assumption that the quotient admits a section and supplying the existence part of the classification as well as uniqueness. The categorical formulation is a genuine improvement: the invariants are defined directly from the action before any classification statement is invoked, and the two functors are built from explicit local models. The proof is long but organized as a legitimate reduction, and it explicitly repairs a known gap in Wiemeler's Lemma 3.2 through Proposition 9.3. If the arguments are correct, the paper will become a standard reference and a model for similar classification problems. The local smoothness lemmas that are the most delicate part of the construction were checked carefully; apart from the small gap noted below, I found them sound.

major comments (1)
  1. [§12, Proposition 12.6] The proof of Proposition 12.6 reduces to the case where, after permuting coordinates, 'there is an integer 1 ≤ k ≤ n' such that the open set O meets the first k facets and no others. This omits the case k=0, namely the case where O meets no facet at all. Since Corollary 12.5 is explicitly stated for 0 ≤ k ≤ min{n,n′}, the missing case is already covered by that corollary, so the repair is local. Nevertheless, Proposition 12.6 is load-bearing for the smooth structure on the blowup functor, and the proof as written is incomplete; it should either state 0 ≤ k ≤ n or add a sentence treating k=0 by Corollary 12.5.
minor comments (8)
  1. [§13, Corollary 13.5] Corollary 13.5 invokes Lemma 4.9 to obtain a manifold-with-corners structure, but Lemma 4.9 is stated only for manifolds, not manifolds-with-corners. The proof of Lemma 4.9 via Lemma 4.8 generalizes immediately, but the statement of Lemma 4.9 should be adjusted or the proof should cite Lemma 4.8 after constructing the topology.
  2. [§12, Proposition 12.6 and §10, Proposition 10.2] The reductions to a situation in which O meets exactly k facets and no others should be made explicitly local, by shrinking to a neighbourhood of a point. As written, a single global k may not exist for an arbitrary open subset O; the argument is local in nature and is valid after this clarification.
  3. [§3, proof of Lemma 3.12] The phrase 'unimodular embedding' should be 'unimodular labelling'.
  4. [Definition 3.17] The phrase 'their homology classes' should be 'their cohomology classes'.
  5. [§7, before Definition 7.3] The text 'principal T-manifolds over decorated manifolds-with-corners' should read 'principal T-bundles over decorated manifolds-with-corners'.
  6. [§13, Construction 13.7] The text 'By Lemma 13.6, \tilde f is an equivariant local diffeomorphism' should say 'equivariant diffeomorphism', since Lemma 13.6 concludes a diffeomorphism.
  7. [§13, after Corollary 13.11] The claim that the cutting functor is 'an isomorphism of categories' should be 'an equivalence of categories', since the proof constructs natural isomorphisms from the compositions to the identity functors, not strict equality of functors.
  8. [Throughout] There are several small typos: 'principle T-bundles' in §1 should be 'principal T-bundles', and reference [34] is missing the author name (Sikorski).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classification is a genuine reduction to the classical, external classification of principal torus bundles by Chern classes.

full rationale

The paper's central classification theorem (Theorem 1.1 / Theorem 3.15) is not circular. The invariants (Q, λ̂, c) are defined directly from an arbitrary locally standard T-manifold in Definition 3.14, using Lemmas 3.11–3.13, before any classification statement is invoked. The proof of fullness and essential surjectivity of the quotient functor is a genuine reduction to the classical classification of principal T-bundles by Chern classes (Remark 3.10, Proposition 7.4, Corollaries 7.6–7.7), which is an external, standard result. The cutting functor (Sections 8–10) constructs a locally standard manifold from a decorated principal bundle, and the simultaneous toric radial blowup functor (Sections 11–13) constructs an inverse; these constructions are justified by local analytic lemmas (Corollary 5.4, Proposition 9.3, Proposition 12.3, Corollary 12.5) that do not presuppose the theorem. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [17], [19]) concern terminology, inspiration, or comparison, and are not load-bearing: the classification does not depend on an unverified uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The only blemish encountered in the proof is that Proposition 12.6 states 'there is an integer 1 ≤ k ≤ n' while O may meet no facets; that k = 0 case is already covered by Corollary 12.5 and does not affect the result. This is a proof-presentation nit, not a circular step. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no construction reduces to its own output by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 2 invented entities

Pure-mathematics paper: no fitted parameters and no ad hoc axioms. The central claim rests on standard background results (Koszul's slice theorem; Whitney's and Schwarz's invariant-function theorems; Hadamard's lemma; the homotopy equivalence between a manifold-with-corners and its interior) and on one substantive external input, the classical classification of principal T-bundles by Chern classes, to which the paper explicitly reduces its result. The new constructions (cutting and simultaneous toric radial blowup) are proven objects rather than postulates. The fragility is concentrated in the local smoothness lemmas of Sections 9 and 12, whose proofs the paper provides in detail.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Koszul's slice theorem: a proper smooth action near an orbit is equivariantly diffeomorphic to the linear model
    Used in the proof of Lemma 3.5 to equate the pointwise definition of locally standard with the chart definition; Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.5.
  • domain assumption Classification of principal T-bundles by Chern classes over manifolds-with-corners
    Remark 3.10 and Proposition 7.4; this is the external benchmark to which the classification is reduced. Standard in topology, but a substantive input that the paper cites rather than proves (via Kostant [21]).
  • standard math The interior Q̊ of a manifold-with-corners is a homotopy equivalence to Q, so H²(Q; t_Z) ≅ H²(Q̊; t_Z)
    Lemma 3.13 uses this isomorphism to define c_M from the Chern class of the principal bundle over the interior; asserted without proof and without citation.
  • standard math Whitney's even-function theorem and Schwarz's invariant-function theorem
    Lemma 5.3, used repeatedly to identify smooth functions on quotients with smooth functions of the invariant coordinates (Sections 5, 9, 12).
  • standard math Hadamard's lemma (division of smooth functions vanishing on a hyperplane)
    Propositions 9.3 and 12.3 write s'_j = s_j h_j and f_j = z_j A_j; the divisibility and positivity arguments are load-bearing for the smoothness of the cut and blowup models.
  • domain assumption Sikorski differential-space formalism, including quotient differential structures and G-averaging of smooth functions
    Section 4, Remarks 4.6-4.7; the framework used to define and identify the smooth structure on M/T (Lemma 3.11).
  • domain assumption Smooth equivariant maps from S¹-representations that vanish on the fixed set are divisible by the coordinate (Bredon's trick)
    Proposition 12.3, first k components argument; standard in equivariant smoothness but used as an unproved background fact.
invented entities (2)
  • Simultaneous toric radial blowup P_M (Construction 11.14) independent evidence
    purpose: Inverse-to-cutting functor taking a locally standard T-manifold to a principal T-bundle over its decorated quotient; the mechanism behind the uniqueness and fullness parts of the classification.
    Fully constructed set-theoretically and smoothed via charts; its defining properties are proven theorems (Lemma 11.15, Corollary 13.5, Lemma 13.6), so it is a constructed object, not an unfalsifiable postulate.
  • Cut space P_cut (cutting functor, Construction 8.3) independent evidence
    purpose: Produces a locally standard T-manifold from a principal T-bundle over a decorated manifold-with-corners; the mechanism behind the existence part of the classification.
    The smooth structure is constructed via explicit charts (Proposition 10.2) and its invariants are verified in Lemma 10.5; constructed, not postulated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of locally standard torus actions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LHPQKKGH

@misc{pith2026250715004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of locally standard torus actions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LHPQKKGH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15004}
}
read the original abstract

An action of a torus T on a manifold M is locally standard if, at each point, the stabilizer is a sub-torus and the non-zero isotropy weights are a basis to its weight lattice. The quotient M/T is then a manifold-with-corners, decorated by a so-called unimodular labelling, which keeps track of the isotropy representations in M, and by a degree two cohomology class with coefficients in the integral lattice of the Lie algebra of T, which encodes the "twistedness" of M over M/T. We classify locally standard smooth actions of T, up to equivariant diffeomorphisms, in terms of triples (Q,lambda,c), where Q is a manifold-with-corners, lambda is a unimodular labelling, and c is a degree two cohomology class with coefficients in the integral lattice.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Resolution of smooth group actions

    P. Albin and R. Melrose, Resolution of smooth group actions , arXiv:1012.5765; Spectral theory and geometric analysis, 1–26, Contemp. Math., 535, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    G. E. Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press, 1972

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    V. M. Buchstaber, T. E. Panov, Torus Actions and Their Applications in Topology and Combinatorics, University Lecture, 24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 2002

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    Davis, Smooth G-manifolds as collections of fibre bundles , Pacific J

    M. Davis, Smooth G-manifolds as collections of fibre bundles , Pacific J. of Math. Vol. 77, No. 2, 1978, 315–363

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Davis, Multiaxial actions on manifolds , Lecture Notes in Math

    M. Davis, Multiaxial actions on manifolds , Lecture Notes in Math. 643, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York 1978

    work page 1978

  6. [6]

    Davis, Universal G-manifolds , Amer

    M. Davis, Universal G-manifolds , Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981), 103–141

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Davis, When are two Coxeter orbifolds diffeomorphic?

    M. Davis, When are two Coxeter orbifolds diffeomorphic? . Michigan Math. J. 63 (2014), 401–421. 51

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Davis, T

    M. Davis, T. Januszkiewicz, Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus action , Duke. Math. J., 62 (1991), no. 2, 417–451

    work page 1991

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Delzant, Hamiltoniens p´ eriodiques et image convexe de l’application moment , Bull

    T. Delzant, Hamiltoniens p´ eriodiques et image convexe de l’application moment , Bull. Soc. Math. France 116 (1988), 315–339

    1988

  2. [10]

    Douady, Vari´ et´ es ` a bords anguleaux et voisinages tubulaires; Th´ eor` emes d’isotopie et de recollement

    A. Douady, Vari´ et´ es ` a bords anguleaux et voisinages tubulaires; Th´ eor` emes d’isotopie et de recollement. S´ eminaire Henri Cartan14, 1961/62

    1961

  3. [11]

    J. J. Duistermaat, On global action-angle coordinates. Commun. Pure Applied Math. vol. XXXIII (1980), 687–706

    1980

  4. [12]

    Andr´ e Haefliger and Eliane Salem, Actions of tori on orbifolds . Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 9, (1991), issue 1, pp. 37–59

    1991

  5. [13]

    Hattori, M

    A. Hattori, M. Masuda, Theory of Multi-fans , Osaka. J. Math., 40 (2003), 1–68

    2003

  6. [14]

    Hochschild, The structure of Lie groups , Holden-Day, San Francisco, California, 1965

    G. Hochschild, The structure of Lie groups , Holden-Day, San Francisco, California, 1965

    1965

  7. [15]

    Ishida and Y

    H. Ishida and Y. Karshon, Completely integrable torus actions on complex manifolds with fixed points . Math. Res. Lett. 19 (2012), no. 06, 1283–1295

    2012

  8. [16]

    Annalen 176 (1968), 53–76

    Klaus J¨ anich,On the classification of O(n)-manifolds, Math. Annalen 176 (1968), 53–76

    1968

  9. [17]

    Yael Karshon, Functoriality for symplectic and contact cutting, and equivariant radial-squared blowups, arXiv:2011.04015 [math.SG]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Yael Karshon and Michael Grossberg, Equivariant index and the moment map for completely integrable torus actions , Adv. Math. 133 (1998), 185–223

    1998

  11. [19]

    SIGMA 11 (2015), 055, 37 pages

    Yael Karshon and Eugene Lerman, Non-compact symplectic toric manifolds . SIGMA 11 (2015), 055, 37 pages

    2015

  12. [20]

    Yael Karshon and Eugene Lerman, Vector fields and flows on subcartesian spaces , SIGMA 19 (2023), 093, 17 pages

    2023

  13. [21]

    Kostant, Quantization and unitary representations

    B. Kostant, Quantization and unitary representations. I. Prequantization. Lectures in modern analysis and applications, III, pp. 87–208. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 170, Springer, Berlin, 1970

    1970

  14. [22]

    Koszul, Sur certains groupes de transformations de Lie

    J. Koszul, Sur certains groupes de transformations de Lie . G´ eom´ etrie diff´ erentielle. Colloq. Int. Cent. Nat. Rech. Sci. Strasbourg (1953), 137–141

    1953

  15. [23]

    Kuroki, An Orlik-Raymond type classification of simply connected 6-dimensional torus manifolds with vanishing odd degree cohomology , Pacific J

    S. Kuroki, An Orlik-Raymond type classification of simply connected 6-dimensional torus manifolds with vanishing odd degree cohomology , Pacific J. of Math. 280-1 (2016), 89–114

    2016

  16. [24]

    Lee, Introduction to smooth manifolds

    J. Lee, Introduction to smooth manifolds. Second Edition, GTM 218, Springer, New York, 2013

    2013

  17. [25]

    Eugene Lerman, symplectic cuts. Math. Res. Letters 2, 247–258 (1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    Eugene Lerman and Susan Tolman, Hamiltonian torus actions on symplectic orbifolds and toric va- rieties, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349 (1997), no. 10, 4201–4230

    1997

  19. [27]

    Masuda, T

    M. Masuda, T. Panov, On the cohomology of torus manifolds , Osaka J. Math., 43, no. 3 (2006), 711–746

    2006

  20. [28]

    arXiv:2401.00570 [math.SG]

    Maarten Mol, On the classification of multiplicity-free Hamiltonian actions by regular proper symplec- tic groupoids. arXiv:2401.00570 [math.SG]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Orlik and F

    P. Orlik and F. Raymond, Actions of the torus on 4-manifolds, I , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (1970), 531–559

    1970

  22. [30]

    Alge- braic and geometric topology 21 (2021), 3601–3622

    Soumen Sarkar and Jongbaek Song, Equivariant cohomological rigidity of certain T -manifolds. Alge- braic and geometric topology 21 (2021), 3601–3622

    2021

  23. [31]

    Topology Appl

    Soumen Sarkar and Dong Youp Suh, A new construction of lens spaces . Topology Appl. 240 (2018), 1–20

    2018

  24. [32]

    Schwarz, Smooth functions invariant under the action of a compact Lie group , Topology, 14 (1975), 63-68

    G. Schwarz, Smooth functions invariant under the action of a compact Lie group , Topology, 14 (1975), 63-68

    1975

  25. [33]

    Abstract covariant derivative

    Roman Sikorski, “Abstract covariant derivative”, Colloq. Math. , 18 (1967), 251–272

    1967

  26. [34]

    Differential modules

    , “Differential modules”, Colloq. Math. , 24 (1971), 45–79

    1971

  27. [35]

    ´Sniatycki, Differential geometry of singular spaces and reduction of symmetry , New Math

    J. ´Sniatycki, Differential geometry of singular spaces and reduction of symmetry , New Math. Monogr. 23, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. 52

    2013

  28. [36]

    Hassler Whitney, Differentiable even functions , Duke Math. J. 10 (1943), 159–160

    1943

  29. [37]

    Wiemeler, Exotic torus manifolds and equivariant smooth structures on quasitoric manifolds, Math

    M. Wiemeler, Exotic torus manifolds and equivariant smooth structures on quasitoric manifolds, Math. Z. 273 (2013), no. 3-4, 1063–1084

    2013

  30. [38]

    Michael Wiemeler, Smooth classification of locally standard T k-manifolds, Osaka J. Math. 59 (2022), no. 3, 549–557

    2022

  31. [39]

    Yoshida, Local torus actions modeled on the standard representation , Adv

    T. Yoshida, Local torus actions modeled on the standard representation , Adv. Math. 227 (2011), 1914–1955

    2011

  32. [40]

    N. T. Zung, Symplectic topology of integrable Hamiltonian systems. II. Topological classification, Compositio Math. 138 (2003), 125–156. math.DG/0010181 Email address : yaelkarshon@tauex.tau.ac.il Tel A viv University, and the University of Toronto Email address : kuroki@ous.a...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.