Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

HybEA: Hybrid Models for Entity Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.02862 v2 pith:LK3NELKC submitted 2024-07-03 cs.DB

classification cs.DB
keywords datasetshybeamethodsembeddingentitiesentityoutperformsstate-of-the-art
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Entity Alignment (EA) aims to detect descriptions of the same real-world entities among different Knowledge Graphs (KG). Several embedding methods have been proposed to rank potentially matching entities of two KGs according to their similarity in the embedding space. However, existing EA embedding methods are challenged by the diverse levels of structural (i.e., neighborhood entities) and semantic (e.g., entity names and literal property values) heterogeneity exhibited by real-world KGs, especially when they are spanning several domains (DBpedia, Wikidata). Existing methods either focus on one of the two heterogeneity kinds depending on the context (mono- vs multi-lingual). To address this limitation, we propose a flexible framework called HybEA, that is a hybrid of two models, a novel attention-based factual model, co-trained with a state-of-the-art structural model. Our experimental results demonstrate that HybEA outperforms the state-of-the-art EA systems, achieving a 16% average relative improvement of Hits@1, ranging from 3.6% up to 40% in 5 monolingual datasets, with some datasets that can now be considered as solved. We also show that HybEA outperforms state-of-the-art methods in 3 multi-lingual datasets, as well as on 2 datasets that drop the unrealistic, yet widely adopted, one-to-one assumption. Overall, HybEA outperforms all (11) baseline methods in all (3) measures and in all (10) datasets evaluated, with a statistically significant difference.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Temporal Knowledge Graph Alignment in the Wild

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HyDRA uses multi-scale hypergraph retrieval-augmented generation and an LLM fusion step to align entities across temporal knowledge graphs with mismatched time granularities and structure, and the paper introduces two...

Pith tools