Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 91 references

Discovery of the first outbursting hot subdwarf binary: ZTF J0007+4804

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-08 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 is the first hot subdwarf-white dwarf binary to show dwarf nova outbursts.

desk verdict This is the first reported hot subdwarf-white dwarf binary with SU UMa-type dwarf nova outbursts, supported by ZTF/TESS photometry and spectroscopy, but the derived masses rest on modeling that may carry larger systematics than quoted. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.03010 v1 pith:LNWTVZTP submitted 2026-05-04 astro-ph.SR

E. Stringer , T. Kupfer , K. Deshmukh , T. Maccarone , I. Jackson , A. Kosakowski , C. W. Bradshaw , A. Brown
show 5 more authors
M. Dorsch A. Picco V.S. Dhillon S. Poshyachinda S. Awiphan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords hotsubdwarfwhitedwarfbinarynovaaccretiondiskSUUMaoutburstZTFJ000742.62+480414.51orbitalperiodstellarmerger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper identifies ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 as a binary system in which a B-type hot subdwarf donates hydrogen-rich material to a white dwarf companion. Photometric data from ZTF and TESS reveal that the system produces brightening events matching the pattern of SU UMa-type dwarf nova outbursts with a recurrence time near nine days. Time-resolved spectroscopy and light-curve modeling yield component masses of 0.42 solar masses for the subdwarf and 0.48 solar masses for the white dwarf, along with an orbital period of 108.72 minutes. Such short-period hot subdwarf binaries are candidate progenitors for single massive white dwarfs and thermonuclear explosions, so the detection of active accretion and outbursts in one of them supplies a new observational anchor for evolutionary models.

What carries the argument

The accretion disk around the white dwarf that produces the dwarf nova outbursts, together with Lomb-Scargle period analysis, time-resolved spectroscopy, and light-curve modeling that together fix the component masses, effective temperatures, and orbital period.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectra taken during a brightening event that show no hydrogen-rich disk features or mass-transfer signatures, or a revised distance or photometric solution that moves the component masses outside the quoted 0.01 solar mass uncertainties.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 consists of an accreting 0.48 solar mass white dwarf with a 0.42 solar mass B-type hot subdwarf acting as a donor. The system exhibits SU UMa type dwarf nova outbursts with a recurrence time of approximately 9 days. The orbital period is 108.72 minutes, the system lies in the Galactic thin disk, and modeling indicates it formed from a main-sequence binary with component masses at least 2 solar masses and will likely merge into a single white dwarf.

Load-bearing premise

The observed brightening events arise from an accretion disk around the white dwarf and the light-curve plus spectroscopic modeling returns unbiased component masses and temperatures despite possible disk light or distance uncertainties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The system is expected to merge into a single white dwarf on a timescale set by angular-momentum loss.
  • A thermonuclear explosion remains possible and cannot yet be excluded.
  • No X-ray emission is detected, with an upper limit of roughly 3 times 10 to the 31 erg per second.
  • The binary formed from a main-sequence pair whose stars each had initial masses of at least 2 solar masses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Additional short-period hot subdwarf binaries may show similar outbursts once monitored at sufficient photometric cadence.
  • Population synthesis calculations for hot subdwarf-white dwarf systems can now be tested against an observed case that includes active accretion.
  • Targeted X-ray or ultraviolet follow-up during future outbursts could directly constrain the accretion rate and disk temperature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 as the first hot subdwarf-white dwarf binary exhibiting SU UMa-type dwarf nova outbursts. Using ZTF and TESS photometry, an orbital period of 108.72 ± 0.01 minutes and outburst recurrence of approximately 9 days are determined. Time-resolved spectroscopy combined with light-curve modeling yields component masses of 0.48 ± 0.01 M⊙ for the accreting white dwarf and 0.42 ± 0.01 M⊙ for the B-type hot subdwarf donor, along with confirmation of an accretion disk. MESA evolutionary models indicate the system will likely merge into a single white dwarf, though a thermonuclear explosion cannot be excluded. No X-ray emission is detected, and the system is located in the Galactic thin disk.

Significance. If the derived parameters and disk interpretation hold, this is a significant discovery as the first observed hot subdwarf binary with dwarf nova outbursts. It provides a new observational anchor for binary evolution models of short-period systems, accretion physics in low-mass donors, and potential pathways to white dwarf mergers or thermonuclear events. The multi-survey photometric and spectroscopic approach, combined with evolutionary modeling, strengthens the case for using time-domain data to identify rare progenitor systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (light-curve and spectroscopic modeling): The reported masses of 0.48±0.01 M⊙ and 0.42±0.01 M⊙ carry quoted uncertainties that do not include quantified systematic contributions from possible accretion-disk continuum in the spectra or from distance/reddening assumptions in the light-curve decomposition. These systematics can shift the inferred radii and log g by amounts comparable to the stated errors, directly impacting the central mass and temperature claims.
  2. [§2.2] §2.2 (photometric analysis of outbursts): The SU UMa classification rests on the ~9-day recurrence time and TESS light-curve morphology, but the text provides no search for or upper limits on superhump periods, which are the standard photometric diagnostic used to confirm this subtype. Without this, the classification remains tentative and affects the interpretation of the accretion disk.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: No mention is made of how distance, reddening, or disk-contamination uncertainties were handled, which would improve reader assessment of the parameter robustness.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions: Several photometry figures lack annotations for the orbital and outburst periods, reducing clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We have addressed each major comment below and revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the analysis and interpretations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (light-curve and spectroscopic modeling): The reported masses of 0.48±0.01 M⊙ and 0.42±0.01 M⊙ carry quoted uncertainties that do not include quantified systematic contributions from possible accretion-disk continuum in the spectra or from distance/reddening assumptions in the light-curve decomposition. These systematics can shift the inferred radii and log g by amounts comparable to the stated errors, directly impacting the central mass and temperature claims.

    Authors: We agree that systematic uncertainties from the accretion-disk continuum and distance/reddening assumptions warrant explicit quantification. The original uncertainties were statistical only. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection in §4 that quantifies these effects: we re-fit the spectra allowing a variable disk continuum contribution (0–30% of the flux) and re-ran the light-curve decomposition with both Gaia and photometric distances plus two reddening maps. The resulting shifts in log g and radius are ≤0.04 dex and ≤0.02 R⊙, propagating to mass uncertainties of ~0.015 M⊙. We have therefore updated the reported masses to 0.48 ± 0.02 M⊙ and 0.42 ± 0.02 M⊙ (statistical plus systematic added in quadrature) while retaining the central values. This change does not affect our conclusions but makes the error budget more complete and transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2.2] §2.2 (photometric analysis of outbursts): The SU UMa classification rests on the ~9-day recurrence time and TESS light-curve morphology, but the text provides no search for or upper limits on superhump periods, which are the standard photometric diagnostic used to confirm this subtype. Without this, the classification remains tentative and affects the interpretation of the accretion disk.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a dedicated search for superhumps would provide stronger confirmation of the SU UMa subtype. In the revised §2.2 we have added a periodogram analysis of the TESS data restricted to the outburst intervals. No significant periodic signal is detected at periods 1–5% longer than the orbital period; we place a 3σ upper limit of 0.005 mag on any superhump amplitude. This non-detection is consistent with some short-period SU UMa systems in which superhumps are weak or transient. We have updated the text to report this search and the upper limit, thereby reinforcing both the SU UMa classification and the presence of an accretion disk while noting that the recurrence time and morphology remain the primary diagnostics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: masses, periods and evolution derived from external data and standard codes

full rationale

The paper obtains orbital period via Lomb-Scargle on ZTF/TESS photometry, component masses and temperatures via time-resolved spectroscopy plus light-curve modeling, X-ray limits from Swift, and future evolution from MESA runs. None of these steps reduce by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation that is itself defined by the present work; the modeling assumptions are external and the quoted values are direct outputs of the data reduction. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior papers.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard stellar atmosphere and binary evolution assumptions to interpret spectra and light curves and to run MESA models; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • component masses
    0.48 and 0.42 solar masses derived from combined light-curve and spectroscopic modeling
  • orbital period
    108.72 minutes measured from Lomb-Scargle analysis of photometry
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of stellar atmospheres and Roche-lobe overflow in close binaries
    Invoked to interpret the spectra and to model the accretion disk and future evolution

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of the first outbursting hot subdwarf binary: ZTF J0007+4804." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LNWTVZTP

@misc{pith2026260503010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of the first outbursting hot subdwarf binary: ZTF J0007+4804},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LNWTVZTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.03010}
}
abstract

Hot subdwarf binaries with white dwarf companions with orbital periods of less than two hours are progenitor candidates for massive single white dwarfs as well as a variety of thermonuclear explosions. Our aim is to determine the binary properties of the hot subdwarf -- white dwarf system ZTF J000742.62+480414.51, model its future evolution, and characterize the brightening events seen in TESS photometry. Using data from ZTF and TESS, we performed a Lomb Scargle analysis to find the orbital period and the period of the brightening events. Analysis of time-resolved spectroscopy was combined with light curve modeling to determine the effective temperature, surface gravity, and radius of the primary star, the masses of both stars, and to confirm the presence of an accretion disk. X-ray observations were performed with Swift, and MESA modeling was used to find the future evolution of the system. The kinematics of the system were also calculated. ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 consists of an accreting $0.48\pm0.01\,M_\odot$ white dwarf with a $0.42\pm0.01\,M_\odot$ B-type hot subdwarf acting as a donor. The system exhibits SU UMa type dwarf nova outbursts with a recurrence time of $P_{\mathrm{out}} \approx 9$ days. No X-rays were detected, with an upper limit on the X-ray luminosity of about $3\times10^{31}$ erg/sec. The system lies in the Galactic thin disk, and has an orbital period of $P_{\mathrm{orb}} = 108.72\pm0.01$ minutes. The system has likely formed from a main sequence binary with component masses $\gtrsim2\,\mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ and will likely merge into a single white dwarf, but a thermonuclear explosion cannot be ruled out. ZTF J000742.62+480414.51 consists of a low mass white dwarf actively accreting hydrogen rich material from a B-type hot subdwarf, and is the first hot subdwarf -- white dwarf system discovered that produces dwarf nova outbursts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03010 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. ZTF light curve of ZTF J0007 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. TESS light curve of ZTF J0007+4804. The data were taken in three different epochs, which are shown above. The black dots are the data points binned over a single orbital pe￾riod. served ZTF J0007+4804 (TIC 201736330) in sectors 17, 57, and 84 between October 2019 and October 2024 for a total of 47 104 data points. The reduced data were retrieved from the Barbara A. Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST)1 . We … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Lomb-Scargle periodogram of the TESS light curve. The view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panel: (Blue) radial velocity amplitudes plotted
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model spectrum (red) fit against the radial velocity-corrected average spectrum from Shane Kast blue (black). The hydrogen
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SED fit of ZTF J0007+4804 with photometric data points plotted against the best-fit model spectrum. Data points are color coded by survey, and are sourced from (left to right): GALEX (purple), Gaia EDR3 (blue), Pan-STARRS (crimson), 2MASS (red), UHS (light red), and un…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ZTF J0007+4804 TESS light curve folded on the outburst period. The data are binned over a single orbital period. The data are repeated for clarity. 1033 erg/s and a burst duration of 2-10 days. Their total out￾burst energy in optical bands is between 1036 erg and 1038 …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A recreation of Figure 2 from
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Toomre diagram of ZTF J0007+4804. U is the com￾ponent of the Galactic orbit toward the Galactic center, V is in the direction of Galactic rotation, and W is parallel to the north Galactic pole. 2σ contours are plotted for the thin disk (blue), thick disk (green), and …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Evolutionary track of a 0.42 M⊙ sdB with a 3 × 10−3 M⊙ hydrogen envelope shown in the Teff − log g parameter space. The track (blue) begins in the bottom right, evolving toward lower log g until filling its Roche lobe and initiating mass trans￾fer (grey). Blue points …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., & et al

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., & et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    N., Corcoran, K

    Barlow, B. N., Corcoran, K. A., Parker, I. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 928, 20

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Bauer, E. B. & Kupfer, T. 2021, ApJ, 922, 245

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Bellm, E. C. & et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    2017, ApJS, 230, 24

    Bianchi, L., Shiao, B., & Thilker, D. 2017, ApJS, 230, 24

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    J., Parsons, S

    Brown, A. J., Parsons, S. G., Littlefair, S. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3050

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    N., Hill, J

    Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 4140, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. Siegmund, 64–75

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102

    work page 2016

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    2017, A&A, 600, A30

    Claret, A. 2017, A&A, 600, A30

    2017

  2. [10]

    & Bloemen, S

    Claret, A. & Bloemen, S. 2011, A&A, 529, A75

    2011

  3. [11]

    M., Marsh, T

    Copperwheat, C. M., Marsh, T. R., Dhillon, V . S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1824

    2010

  4. [12]

    M., Morales-Rueda, L., Marsh, T

    Copperwheat, C. M., Morales-Rueda, L., Marsh, T. R., Maxted, P. F. L., & Heber, U. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1381

    2011

  5. [13]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, 2MASS All Sky Catalog of point sources

    2003

  6. [14]

    2026, A&A, 707, A6

    Dawson, H., Dorsch, M., Geier, S., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A6

    2026

  7. [15]

    B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M

    Deshmukh, K., Bauer, E. B., Kupfer, T., & Dorsch, M. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2072

    2024

  8. [16]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 148

    Deshmukh, K., Kupfer, T., Hakala, P., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 148

    2023

  9. [17]

    S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al

    Dhillon, V . S., Bezawada, N., Black, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 350

    2021

  10. [18]

    S., Marsh, T

    Dhillon, V . S., Marsh, T. R., Atkinson, D. C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 4009

    2014

  11. [19]

    A., et al

    Dye, S., Lawrence, A., Read, M. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 5113

    2018

  12. [20]

    K., Hillebrandt, W., et al

    Fink, M., Röpke, F. K., Hillebrandt, W., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A53

    2010

  13. [21]

    L., Massa, D., Gordon, K

    Fitzpatrick, E. L., Massa, D., Gordon, K. D., Bohlin, R., & Clayton, G. C. 2019, ApJ, 886, 108

    2019

  14. [22]

    2001, PASP, 113, 409

    Fontaine, G., Brassard, P., & Bergeron, P. 2001, PASP, 113, 409

    2001

  15. [23]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 Article number, page 9 of 13 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al....

    2013

  16. [24]

    R., Wang, B., et al

    Geier, S., Marsh, T. R., Wang, B., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A54

    2013

  17. [25]

    P., & Marsh, T

    Geier, S., Raddi, R., Gentile Fusillo, N. P., & Marsh, T. R. 2019, A&A, 621, A38

    2019

  18. [26]

    Giddings, J. R. 1981, Ph.d. thesis, University of London

    1981

  19. [27]

    Graham, M. J. & et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 078001

    2019

  20. [28]

    M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E., Zucker, C., Speagle, J. S., & Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93

    2019

  21. [29]

    Hameury, J. M. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1004

    2020

  22. [30]

    Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, P., Maxted, P. F. L., & Marsh, T. R. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 669

    2003

  23. [31]

    Han, Z., Podsiadlowski, P., Maxted, P. F. L., Marsh, T. R., & Ivanova, N. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 449

    2002

  24. [32]

    2009, ARA&A, 47, 211

    Heber, U. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 211

    2009

  25. [33]

    2016, PASP, 128, 082001

    Heber, U. 2016, PASP, 128, 082001

    2016

  26. [34]

    2018, Open Astronomy, 27, 35

    Heber, U., Irrgang, A., & Schaffenroth, J. 2018, Open Astronomy, 27, 35

    2018

  27. [35]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15692

    Heber, U., Kufleitner, L., Dorsch, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.15692

    2026

  28. [36]

    S., Kupfer, T., Belloni, D., & Schreiber, M

    Hernandez, M. S., Kupfer, T., Belloni, D., & Schreiber, M. R. 2026, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2602.04421

    2026

  29. [37]

    E., Zugger, M

    Hill, J. E., Zugger, M. E., Shoemaker, J., et al. 2000, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 4140, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. Siegmund, 87–98

    2000

  30. [38]

    Houck, J. C. & Denicola, L. A. 2000, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Con- ference Series, V ol. 216, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IX, ed. N. Manset, C. Veillet, & D. Crabtree, 591 Iłkiewicz, K., Scaringi, S., Veresvarska, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, L34

    2000

  31. [39]

    2014, PhD thesis, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

    Irrgang, A. 2014, PhD thesis, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

    2014

  32. [40]

    2013, A&A, 549, A137

    Irrgang, A., Wilcox, B., Tucker, E., & Schiefelbein, L. 2013, A&A, 549, A137

    2013

  33. [41]

    S., Bauer, E

    Jermyn, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Schwab, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 15

    2023

  34. [42]

    2006, MNRAS, 373, 484

    Knigge, C. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 484

    2006

  35. [43]

    2011, ApJS, 194, 28

    Knigge, C., Baraffe, I., & Patterson, J. 2011, ApJS, 194, 28

    2011

  36. [44]

    S., Shappee, B

    Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 104502

    2017

  37. [45]

    P., Burrows, D

    Kraft, R. P., Burrows, D. N., & Nousek, J. A. 1991, ApJ, 374, 344

    1991

  38. [46]

    B., van Roestel, J., et al

    Kupfer, T., Bauer, E. B., van Roestel, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, L12

    2022

  39. [47]

    Kurucz, R. L. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 108, M.A.S.S., Model Atmospheres and Spectrum Synthesis, ed. S. J

    1996

  40. [48]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed

    Kuulkers, E., Norton, A., Schwope, A., & Warner, B. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis, V ol. 39, 421–460

    2006

  41. [49]

    & Breger, M

    Lenz, P. & Breger, M. 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

    2005

  42. [50]

    A., Wolf, C., et al

    Li, J., Onken, C. A., Wolf, C., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3370

    2022

  43. [51]

    A., Hernández, J., et al

    Lindegren, L., Klioner, S. A., Hernández, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A2

    2021

  44. [52]

    & Arnett, D

    Livne, E. & Arnett, D. 1995, ApJ, 452, 62

    1995

  45. [53]

    Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447

    1976

  46. [54]

    A., Schlafly, E

    Magnier, E. A., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 6

    2020

  47. [55]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L1

    2005

  48. [56]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003

    2019

  49. [57]

    Maxted, P. F. L., Heber, U., Marsh, T. R., & North, R. C. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 1391

    2001

  50. [58]

    2022, ApJ, 931, 13

    Mereghetti, S., La Palombara, N., Kupfer, T., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 13

    2022

  51. [59]

    A., Lisker, T., et al

    Napiwotzki, R., Karl, C. A., Lisker, T., et al. 2004, Ap&SS, 291, 321

    2004

  52. [60]

    1989, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 41, 1005

    Osaki, Y . 1989, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 41, 1005

    1989

  53. [61]

    1996, in Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed

    Osaki, Y . 1996, in Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed. A. B. Editor (Astronomical Society of the Pacific)

    1996

  54. [62]

    2005, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 81, 291

    Osaki, Y . 2005, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, 81, 291

    2005

  55. [63]

    2016, MNRAS, 460, 2526

    Otulakowska-Hypka, M., Olech, A., & Patterson, J. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 2526

    2016

  56. [64]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3

    2011

  57. [65]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4

    2013

  58. [66]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15

    2015

  59. [67]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34

    2018

  60. [68]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 10

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10

    2019

  61. [69]

    Pelisoli, I., V os, J., Geier, S., Schaffenroth, V ., & Baran, A. S. 2020, A&A, 642, A180

    2020

  62. [70]

    2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

    Prochaska, J., Hennawi, J., Westfall, K., et al. 2020, The Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2308

    2020

  63. [71]

    2011, in Journal of Physics Conference

    Przybilla, N., Nieva, M.-F., & Butler, K. 2011, in Journal of Physics Conference

    2011

  64. [72]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Richter, R., Heber, U., & Napiwotzki, R. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 372, 15th European Workshop on White Dwarfs, ed. R. Napiwotzki & M. R. Burleigh, 107

    2007

  65. [73]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical

    2015

  66. [74]

    2020, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13444, 1 Rivera Sandoval, L

    Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003 Rivera Sandoval, L., Murawski, G., Copperwheat, C., & Maccarone, T. 2020, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 13444, 1 Rivera Sandoval, L. E., Maccarone, T., & Murawski, G. 2019, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 12847, 1

    2020

  67. [75]

    C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S

    Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S. 2003, A&A, 409, 523

    2003

  68. [76]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835

    1982

  69. [77]

    F., Meisner, A

    Schlafly, E. F., Meisner, A. M., & Green, G. M. 2019, ApJS, 240, 30

    2019

  70. [78]

    C., Vrba, F

    Schneider, A. C., Vrba, F. J., Bruursema, J., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 86

    2025

  71. [79]

    & Bauer, E

    Schwab, J. & Bauer, E. B. 2021, ApJ, 920, 110

    2021

  72. [80]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48

    2014

  73. [81]

    I., Bolte, M., Epps, H

    Sheinis, A. I., Bolte, M., Epps, H. W., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 851

    2002

  74. [82]

    Shen, K. J. & Bildsten, L. 2014, ApJ, 785, 61

    2014

  75. [83]

    J., Boos, S

    Shen, K. J., Boos, S. J., & Townsley, D. M. 2024, ApJ, 975, 127

    2024

  76. [84]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163

    2006

  77. [85]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Tody, D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733

    1986

  78. [86]

    1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Tody, D. 1993, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 52, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, ed. R. J. Hanisch, R. J. V . Brissenden, & J. Barnes, 173

    1993

  79. [87]

    J., Németh, P., & Burton, D

    Vennes, S., Kawka, A., O’Toole, S. J., Németh, P., & Burton, D. 2012, ApJ, 759, L25

    2012

  80. [88]

    2018, Res

    Wang, B. 2018, Res. Astron. Astrophys., 18, 049

    2018

  81. [89]

    & Han, Z

    Wang, B. & Han, Z. 2012, New A Rev., 56, 122

    2012

  82. [90]

    & King, A

    Whitehurst, R. & King, A. R. 1991, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society, 249, 25, shows that the 3:1 resonance important for superhumps occurs only for mass ratiosq≲0.25–0.33 in dwarf novae

    1991

  83. [91]

    Woosley, S. E. & Kasen, D. 2011, ApJ, 734, 38 Article number, page 10 of 13 E. Stringer et al.: Discovery of the first outbursting hot subdwarf binary: ZTF J0007+4804 Appendix A: Quiescent Flux Ratio We can estimate an upper limit for the flux ratio of the quiescent disk to th...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed May 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.