Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Influence of plasma particle flow on dust grain charging and on particle number density

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Plasma particle flow into and out of a finite dusty region sets a stable, nonzero dust potential and plasma densities that scale with region size, the paper argues.

desk verdict A clean finite-region source/sink model gives a plausible size-dependent dust charging equilibrium for modest radii, but the large-region negative-potential prediction rests on an unmodeled regional self-potential that the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16333 v2 pith:LNYTJC7C submitted 2024-11-25 physics.plasm-ph

L. B. De Toni , L. F. Ziebell , R. Gaelzer This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.27.Lw
keywords dustyplasmadustgrainchargingOMLtheoryparticlesourcesandsinksequilibriumpotentialfiniteregiondensitydepletion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a finite dusty plasma region embedded in a steady surrounding plasma does not evolve toward complete plasma absorption and zero dust potential, as the bare orbital-motion-limited (OML) charging theory would predict. Instead, once simple inflow and outflow of plasma particles across the region boundary is added, the system reaches a stable equilibrium with a nonzero, negative dust potential and nonzero electron and ion densities. The equilibrium depends on the region's radius: bigger regions end up with lower plasma densities and a more negative dust potential, and for very large regions the potential can become strongly negative after a long transient that tracks the no-source case. The authors care because real dusty plasmas in space and the laboratory are finite and coupled to their surroundings, so the size of the dusty cloud should shape the charging state.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the coupled set of dimensionless evolution equations: one for the dust potential, driven by OML currents (Eqs. (7)--(9)), and one for the plasma densities (Eq. (19)), which sums three contributions: absorption by grains (Eq. (18)), a source of particles flowing into the region at the thermal rate $n_0 v_{T\beta} A_s/V$, and a sink flowing out at the time-dependent rate $n_\beta v_{T\beta} A_s/V$ (Eqs. (14)--(15), written dimensionless as Eqs. (16)--(17)). The region radius $R$ enters through the surface-to-volume ratio $A_s/V$ and through the normalization $R/r_d$; it is the parameter that controls the equilibrium potential and densities.

What would settle it

Compute the large-region equilibrium using the same equations but with the electron source term multiplied by a Boltzmann factor $\exp(e\Phi_{\mathrm{region}}/k_B T_e)$, or by a factor derived from a kinetic model of the region's potential barrier, and check whether the dust potential still falls far below the values found for small regions; if the source is suppressed, the mechanism identified in the paper would no longer hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the OML description of dust charging by electron and ion absorption, the paper introduces source and sink terms representing the flow of plasma particles into and out of a finite spherical dusty region of radius $R$, surrounded by a dustless plasma of fixed density. Solving the coupled evolution equations for dust potential and electron and ion densities, it finds that the dust potential tends to a nonzero equilibrium value $\psi_{d,\mathrm{eq}}$ that becomes more negative as $R$ grows, while the equilibrium electron and ion densities fall with $R$. For moderate radii ($R/r_d$ from $10^2$ to $3\times 10^4$) the ion density at equilibrium drops to about half its initial value in the largest case, whereas the electron density changes by only a few percent. For very large radii the potential initially follows the no-source evolution but then departs from it: the electron source term overtakes the combined sink and absorption terms, the electron density rises, and the potential is driven to strongly negative values instead of returning to zero. The paper attributes this regime to the electron source outpacing the particle losses during a chosen time interval.

Load-bearing premise

The inflow of plasma particles is assumed to happen at the full thermal rate $n_0 v_{T\beta}$ regardless of the electric potential of the charged region, even though the region's negative potential would repel electrons and reduce the electron source; if that potential barrier were included, the predicted strongly negative large-region equilibria could weaken or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A finite dust cloud embedded in a steady plasma will not run out of plasma particles; it settles into a steady state with nonzero dust potential and nonzero free-electron and ion densities.
  • The equilibrium dust potential and plasma densities are controlled by the cloud radius, so models that use constant background densities or infinite-region assumptions may misstate the charge state of real dusty clouds.
  • In large dusty regions, the early charging phase matches the isolated no-source prediction, but later the electron inflow dominates the losses and the dust potential becomes strongly negative rather than returning to zero.
  • The model reproduces the observed decrease of electron and ion densities inside dense dust clouds, supporting the use of finite-region flow terms as a minimal explanation for density depletion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model assumes the region's own electric potential does not screen the inflow; if a Boltzmann-like suppression of the electron source were added, the predicted strongly negative large-region potentials could be substantially weakened, which is a direct test of the paper's mechanism.
  • The uniform-volume source/sink approximation likely overestimates the coupling of the region to its surroundings because real flows enter through the boundary; a spatially resolved or diffusion-including model could reveal whether the density fluctuations seen at intermediate $R$ persist.
  • The proposed $R$ scaling suggests a route to estimate dusty-region sizes from measured dust potential or plasma density depletion in environments such as noctilucent clouds or planetary plumes, if the model's assumptions hold.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the time evolution of the dust grain electrical potential and the electron/ion number densities in a homogeneous dusty plasma, using OML charging currents and adding a zero-dimensional source/sink model for plasma flow into and out of a finite spherical dusty region. Without sources or sinks, the densities decay monotonically and the dust potential returns to zero after the plasma is exhausted. With the proposed source/sink terms, the system reaches a nonzero equilibrium dust potential and nonzero equilibrium densities, and these equilibria depend on the region radius R through the As/V = 3/R scaling in Eqs. (16)-(17). Numerical solutions are presented for R/rd from 10^2 to 3×10^4 (potentials near -2.5 to -3.0) and for R/rd up to 10^11 (potentials reaching about -14), with the large-radius behavior attributed to the electron source term overcoming the combined sink and absorption terms.

Significance. The paper offers a transparent, parameter-free ODE model for how a finite dusty region's size affects dust charging and plasma depletion, a question relevant to noctilucent clouds, Enceladus' plume, and stellar winds. The modest-region results summarized in Table I are plausible, the 1/R dependence of the source/sink terms is derived explicitly, and the authors are unusually candid about the model's limitations. However, the most dramatic quantitative claim in the abstract and conclusions—that larger regions lead to strongly more negative equilibrium potentials, up to ψ_d ≈ -14—rests on two approximations that the authors themselves flag as invalid for those cases: the neglect of the electric potential acquired by the finite region, and the breakdown of OML validity at the very low densities reached for large R. The paper's significance is therefore conditional on either adding a self-consistent treatment of these effects or substantially narrowing the claimed range of validity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV, Figs. 6-7, Eq. (14)] The central large-region result (equilibrium ψ_d approaching -14 as R/rd → 10^9-10^11) is driven by the source term in Eq. (14), which injects electrons at the full thermal rate n0 v_Te A_s/V regardless of the electric potential acquired by the dusty region. Since the dust grains are negatively charged, the finite region itself should become negatively charged and repel entering electrons; the electron source should be suppressed by a Boltzmann factor exp(eΦ_region/k_B T_e). The paper explicitly acknowledges this omission in Sec. III ('it does not take into account the electric potential acquired by the finite region') and Sec. V ('the model does not consider the effects of the finite region itself being electrically charged'). Because the mechanism described in Sec. IV and the Conclusion—the electron source surpassing the combined sink and absorption terms—depends directly on this uncorrected inflow, the predicted strongly negative potentials for large regions are not supported without a self-consistent treatment of the region potential. The authors should either include such a coupling or restrict the abstract and conclusions to the regime where this effect is negligible.
  2. [Sec. IV, Figs. 6-7 and Sec. II] The large-region calculations are performed in a regime where the OML theory has already broken down. Section II states the validity condition a ≪ λ_D < λ_mfp, and Sec. IV itself notes that for the larger regions 'the plasma densities decrease to levels where the OML theory is no longer valid, as the Debye length exceeds the plasma-dust collisional mean free path.' For R/rd = 10^5 and above, Fig. 7 shows densities dropping by several orders of magnitude, so λ_D grows while λ_mfp remains fixed, violating the stated condition. The numerical values ψ_d ≈ -12 to -14 in Fig. 6 are therefore extrapolations of the OML absorption model, not predictions of the model. The manuscript should present these results as illustrative of the model's mathematical behavior and clearly separate them from the physically valid modest-region results, or it should adopt a charging model that remains valid in the strong-depletion regime.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, Eqs. (8)-(9)] The sign conventions in the dimensionless cross-section formulas are difficult to follow: χ_ed and χ_id are defined in Eq. (4), but the exponentials in Eqs. (8) and (9) would be clearer if the authors wrote them explicitly in terms of ψ_d and the temperature ratio, since the current expressions for negative vs. positive grain potential are central to the numerics.
  2. [Sec. III, Eqs. (16)-(17)] The derivation of the dimensionless source and sink coefficients would benefit from one intermediate line showing the substitution of τ_c and As/V = 3/R, so the reader can verify the 1/R scaling without reconstructing the algebra.
  3. [Sec. II, Eq. (11)] The statement that 'we consider that the sums within each parenthesis in equation (11) are equal to zero' is an assumption about how charge is partitioned between the two species; it should be justified physically (each species' density changes only through its own absorption current) rather than presented as the only possible reading of Eq. (11).
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 5] The non-monotonic density fluctuations seen for R/rd = 10^4 between τ ≈ 10^2 and 10^3 are described as 'likely' resulting from the interplay of currents and flows, but the manuscript does not identify whether this is a physical oscillation or a numerical artifact of the stiff ODE system; a brief comment on the numerical integrator and tolerances would help.
  5. [Throughout] There are several minor typographical issues, including 'The Atrophys. J.' in Refs. 11, 26, and 28, 'the lost of a notable amount' in Sec. I, and inconsistent spacing in expressions like 'R/rd=10 2' and '3 ×104'; these should be corrected in a final proofreading pass.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central size-dependent equilibrium is a derived consequence of the openly stated source/sink model, and no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a straightforward consequence of its stated model equations (7), (16)-(19), with no parameter fitted to the quantities being predicted. The source and sink terms are explicitly modeled as proportional to n0 v_T_beta A_s/V and n_beta v_T_beta A_s/V, and the region-size dependence enters directly as 1/R through Eqs. (16)-(17). The finding that larger regions equilibrate at lower plasma densities and more negative dust potentials is therefore a derived property of the ODE system, not a restatement of a fitted input or a renamed known result. The authors openly state the main physical limitation, namely that the model does not take into account the electric potential acquired by the finite region (Sec. III and Sec. V); this is a modeling approximation that affects the physical realism of the large-region prediction, but it is not a circularity in the derivation. Self-citations in the reference list (e.g., Refs. 16-18) are background context and are not load-bearing for the new results. No uniqueness theorem is invoked, no parameter is fitted to the predicted equilibrium values, and no prediction is used as an input. The derivation is self-contained given the stated assumptions, and the paper is honest about the limits of those assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities. Its main assumptions are the OML closure, Maxwellian distributions, and a simplified uniform flow model; the central size-dependence result follows from the 1/R scaling of the flow terms. One order-unity coefficient (inflow flux) is assumed rather than derived, but no parameters are fitted to experimental data.

free parameters (1)
  • inflow flux coefficient C (units of n0 vTβ) = 1 (assumed, not fitted)
    Eq. (14) sets the source flux per unit area to n0 vTβ; a different choice, e.g., n0 vTβ/4 from effusion theory, would change the equilibrium densities and potentials. This is a modeling choice, not a measured value.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Orbit Motion Limited (OML) absorption model: collisionless trajectories and a << lambda_D < lambda_mfp
    Used to derive cross-section (2) and currents (8)-(9); the paper states validity requires these inequalities.
  • domain assumption Plasma species follow Maxwellian velocity distributions
    Simplifies current integrals; acknowledged that many space plasmas are non-Maxwellian.
  • ad hoc to paper Quasi-neutrality plus the assumption that electron and ion density equations decouple as in Eqs. (12)-(13)
    Eq. (11) follows from quasi-neutrality, but the split into separate equalities is an unstated closure assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper Source and sink of plasma particles are uniform throughout the region volume, not at boundaries, and diffusion is neglected
    Stated in Sec. I and III as a first approach; real particles would enter through boundaries and diffuse.
  • ad hoc to paper The electric potential acquired by the finite dusty region does not affect the incoming/outgoing particle fluxes
    Stated in Sec. III and V; a negative region potential would repel electrons and reduce the electron source term.
  • ad hoc to paper OML theory is applied even when densities drop enough that lambda_D may exceed lambda_mfp
    Sec. IV: 'the OML theory is no longer valid... However, we find it valuable to illustrate how the model behaves under these extreme conditions.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of plasma particle flow on dust grain charging and on particle number density." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LNYTJC7C

@misc{pith2026241116333,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of plasma particle flow on dust grain charging and on particle number density},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LNYTJC7C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16333}
}
read the original abstract

This study explores the dynamic evolution of dust electrical potential and plasma particle number densities with a focus on the charging of dust grains through electron and ion absorption, as described by the orbital motion limited (OML) theory. The initial model, which does not account for plasma particle sources and sinks, predicts that dust grains could eventually absorb all plasma particles, leading to a null electrical potential. To address this, we introduced source and sink terms considering a finite region of space in order to simulate real conditions. Our findings indicate that, with the inclusion of plasma particle flow into and out of the region, dust grains reach a stable, non-zero equilibrium potential and the electron and ion densities reach an equilibrium value. This equilibrium is dependent on the size of the region; larger regions result in lower plasma densities and more negative equilibrium potentials. For extensive regions, the dust potential initially mirrors the scenario without sources or sinks but eventually deviates, showing increasing negative values as the region size grows. This behavior is attributed to the electron source term surpassing the combined sink and absorption terms at certain intervals along time evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16333 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Time evolution of the dimensionless dust poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic diagram of the modeled plasma. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Time evolution of normalized dust electrical potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of dimensionless dust electrical poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time evolution of electron (top panel) and ion (bot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Time evolution of electron (top panel) and ion (bot [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time evolution of the absolute values of the terms in equation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    author author P. K. \ Shukla \ and\ author A. A. \ Mamun ,\ @noop title Introduction to Dusty Plasma Physics \ ( publisher IoP Publishing ,\ address Bristol ,\ year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Spitzer , Lyman ,\ 10.1086/144273 journal journal The Atrophys

    author author J. Spitzer , Lyman ,\ 10.1086/144273 journal journal The Atrophys. J. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 369 ( year 1941 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1086/144273 1941

  8. [8]

    Khrapak \ and\ author G

    author author S. Khrapak \ and\ author G. Morfill ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/ctpp.200910018 journal journal Contrib. Plasma Phys. \ volume 49 ,\ pages 148 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.200910018 2009

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    author author P. K. \ Shukla \ and\ author B. Eliasson ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.25 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 25 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  2. [10]

    Mendis ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(84)90015-2 journal journal Adv

    author author D. Mendis ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(84)90015-2 journal journal Adv. Space Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 111 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984 doi

  3. [11]

    Staubach , author E

    author author P. Staubach , author E. Grün , \ and\ author R. Jehn ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00017-3 journal journal Adv. Space Res. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 301 ( year 1997 ) ,\ note space Debris NoStop

    1997 doi

  4. [12]

    author author M. V. \ Sykes , author E. Gr \"u n , author W. T. \ Reach , \ and\ author P. Jenniskens ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Comets II \ ( year 2004 )\ pp.\ pages 677--693 NoStop

    2004

  5. [13]

    L \'e na , author Y

    author author P. L \'e na , author Y. Viala , author D. Hall , \ and\ author A. Soufflot ,\ @noop journal journal Astron. and Astrophys. \ volume 37 ,\ pages 81 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  6. [14]

    Mankin , author R

    author author W. Mankin , author R. MacQueen , \ and\ author R. Lee ,\ @noop journal journal Astron. and Astrophys. \ volume 31 ,\ pages 17 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  7. [15]

    author author R. A. \ Howard , author A. Vourlidas , author V. Bothmer , author R. C. \ Colaninno , author C. E. \ DeForest , author B. Gallagher , author J. R. \ Hall , author P. Hess , author A. K. \ Higginson , author C. M. \ Korendyke , et al. ,\ 10.1038/s41586-019-1807-x ...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author G. C. \ Clayton , author B. A. \ Whitney , author S. A. \ Stanford , \ and\ author J. S. \ Drilling ,\ 10.1086/171821 journal journal The Atrophys. J. \ volume 397 ,\ pages 652 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  9. [17]

    author author G. R. \ Knapp ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Late Stages of Stellar Evolution ,\ editor edited by\ editor S. Kwok \ and\ editor S. R. \ Pottasch \ ( publisher Springer Netherlands ,\ address Dordrecht ,\ year 1987 )\ pp.\ pages 103--118 NoStop

    1987

  10. [18]

    \ and\ author H\"ofner, S

    author author Mattsson, L. \ and\ author H\"ofner, S. ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201015572 journal journal Astron. and Astrophys. \ volume 533 ,\ pages A42 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  11. [19]

    author author E. P. \ Lieb , author R. M. \ Lau , author J. L. \ Hoffman , author M. F. \ Corcoran , author M. Garcia Marin , author T. R. \ Gull , author K. Hamaguchi , author Y. Han , author M. J. \ Hankins , author O. C. \ Jones , author T. I. \ Madura , author S. V. \ Marc...

  12. [20]

    author author M. C. \ De Juli \ and\ author R. S. \ Schneider ,\ 10.1017/S0022377898006849 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 243 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  13. [21]

    author author M. C. \ De Juli , author R. S. \ Schneider , author L. F. \ Ziebell , \ and\ author V. Jatenco-Pereira ,\ 10.1063/1.1899647 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 12 ,\ pages 052109 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    author author L. F. \ Ziebell , author M. C. \ De Juli , author R. S. \ Schneider , \ and\ author V. Jatenco-Pereira ,\ 10.1063/1.1987270 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 12 ,\ pages 082102 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  15. [23]

    author author L. B. \ De Toni \ and\ author R. Gaelzer ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stab2603 journal journal MNRAS \ volume 508 ,\ pages 340 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    author author J. E. \ Allen , author R. L. F. \ Boyd , \ and\ author P. Reynolds ,\ 10.1088/0370-1301/70/3/303 journal journal Proc. Phys. Soc. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 297 ( year 1957 ) NoStop

    1957 doi

  17. [25]

    author author H. M. \ Mott-Smith \ and\ author I. Langmuir ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.28.727 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 727 ( year 1926 ) NoStop

    1926 doi

  18. [26]

    author author J. E. \ Allen ,\ 10.1088/0031-8949/45/5/013 journal journal Phys. Scr. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 497 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  19. [27]

    author author I. B. \ Bernstein \ and\ author I. N. \ Rabinowitz ,\ 10.1063/1.1705900 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 2 ,\ pages 112 ( year 1959 ) NoStop

    1959 doi

  20. [28]

    author author J. C. \ Weingartner \ and\ author B. T. \ Draine ,\ 10.1086/320852 journal journal The Astrophys. J. Suppl. Series \ volume 134 ,\ pages 263 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  21. [29]

    Godenko \ and\ author V

    author author E. Godenko \ and\ author V. Izmodenov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.016 journal journal Adv. Space Res. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 5142 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    author author B. T. \ Draine \ and\ author B. Sutin ,\ 10.1086/165596 journal journal Astrophys. J. \ volume 320 ,\ pages 803 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  23. [31]

    Kimura \ and\ author I

    author author H. Kimura \ and\ author I. Mann ,\ 10.1086/305613 journal journal The Atrophys. J. \ volume 499 ,\ pages 454 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  24. [32]

    Misra , author S

    author author S. Misra , author S. K. \ Mishra , \ and\ author M. S. \ Sodha ,\ 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20774.x journal journal MNRAS \ volume 423 ,\ pages 176 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  25. [33]

    author author V. V. \ Yaroshenko , author H. Lühr , \ and\ author W. J. \ Miloch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019213 journal journal J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 221 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    author author V. E. \ Fortov , author A. V. \ Ivlev , author S. A. \ Khrapak , author A. G. \ Khrapak , \ and\ author G. E. \ Morfill ,\ 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.007 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 421 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  27. [35]

    author author B. T. \ Draine ,\ @noop title Physics of the interstellar and intergalactic medium ,\ Vol. volume 19 \ ( publisher Princeton University Press ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  28. [36]

    Havnes , author C

    author author O. Havnes , author C. K. \ Goertz , author G. E. \ Morfill , author E. Gr\"un , \ and\ author W. Ip ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA03p02281 journal journal J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 2281 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    Hervig , author R

    author author M. Hervig , author R. E. \ Thompson , author M. McHugh , author L. L. \ Gordley , author J. M. \ Russell III , \ and\ author M. E. \ Summers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012104 journal journal Geophys. Res. Lett. \ volume 28 ,\ pages 971 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    doi

  30. [38]

    Baumgarten , author J

    author author G. Baumgarten , author J. Fiedler , author F.-J. \ L\"ubken , \ and\ author G. von Cossart ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008884 journal journal J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres \ volume 113 ( year 2008 ),\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008884 NoStop

    2008 doi

  31. [39]

    Pedersen , author J

    author author A. Pedersen , author J. Troim , \ and\ author J. Kane ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(70)90092-9 journal journal Planet. Space Sci. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 945 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970 doi

  32. [40]

    Balsiger , author E

    author author F. Balsiger , author E. Kopp , author M. Friedrich , author K. M. \ Torkar , author U. W\"alchli , \ and\ author G. Witt ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL03608 journal journal Geophys. Res. Lett. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 93 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    doi

  33. [41]

    Engelhardt , author J.-E

    author author I. Engelhardt , author J.-E. \ Wahlund , author D. Andrews , author A. Eriksson , author S. Ye , author W. Kurth , author D. Gurnett , author M. Morooka , author W. Farrell , \ and\ author M. Dougherty ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.010 journal journal ...

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author V. V. \ Yaroshenko \ and\ author H. L\"uhr ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020008 journal journal J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. \ volume 119 ,\ pages 6190 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    author author M. W. \ Morooka , author J.-E. \ Wahlund , author A. I. \ Eriksson , author W. M. \ Farrell , author D. A. \ Gurnett , author W. S. \ Kurth , author A. M. \ Persoon , author M. Shafiq , author M. Andr\'e , \ and\ author M. K. G. \ Holmberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1...

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author W. M. \ Farrell , author W. S. \ Kurth , author D. A. \ Gurnett , author R. E. \ Johnson , author M. L. \ Kaiser , author J.-E. \ Wahlund , \ and\ author J. H. \ Waite Jr. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL037108 journal journal Geophys. Res. Lett. \ volume 36 ( y...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Horányi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.383 journal journal Annu

    author author M. Horányi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.383 journal journal Annu. Rev. of Astron. and Astrophys. \ volume 34 ,\ pages 383 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  38. [46]

    author author T. S. \ Basha \ and\ author A. Abbas ,\ 10.1088/0143-0807/10/2/014 journal journal European J. Phys. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 151 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989 doi

  39. [47]

    Ostrikov , author M

    author author K. Ostrikov , author M. Yu , \ and\ author L. Stenflo ,\ 10.1109/27.923688 journal journal IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. \ volume 29 ,\ pages 175 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  40. [48]

    author author J. S. \ Chang \ and\ author K. Spariosu ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.62.97 journal journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. \ volume 62 ,\ pages 97 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993 doi

  41. [49]

    author author S. K. \ Kodanova , author N. K. \ Bastykova , author T. S. \ Ramazanov , author G. N. \ Nigmetova , author S. A. \ Maiorov , \ and\ author Z. A. \ Moldabekov ,\ 10.1109/TPS.2019.2916303 journal journal IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 3052 ( year 2019...

    2019

  42. [50]

    author author J. D. \ Mihalov , author H. M. \ Fischer , author E. Pehlke , \ and\ author L. J. \ Lanzerotti ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL003812 journal journal Geophy. Res. Lett. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 2445 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    Porco , author E

    author author C. Porco , author E. Baker , author J. Barbara , author K. Beurle , author A. Brahic , author J. Burns , author S. Charnoz , author N. Cooper , author D. Dawson , author A. Del Genio , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal science \ volume 307 ,\ pages 1226 ( year 2005...

    2005

  44. [52]

    Runov , author V

    author author A. Runov , author V. Angelopoulos , author C. Gabrielse , author J. Liu , author D. L. \ Turner , \ and\ author X.-Z. \ Zhou ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021166 journal journal J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 4369 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  45. [53]

    Futaana , author S

    author author Y. Futaana , author S. Machida , author Y. Saito , author A. Matsuoka , \ and\ author H. Hayakawa ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009366 journal journal J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. \ volume 108 ,\ pages SMP 15 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi

  46. [54]

    author author L. B. \ Wilson III , author L.-J. \ Chen , author S. Wang , author S. J. \ Schwartz , author D. L. \ Turner , author M. L. \ Stevens , author J. C. \ Kasper , author A. Osmane , author D. Caprioli , author S. D. \ Bale , author M. P. \ Pulupa , author C. S. \ Sal...

    doi

  47. [55]

    Ber c i c , author M

    author author L. Ber c i c , author M. Maksimovi\' c , author S. Landi , \ and\ author L. Matteini ,\ 10.1093/mnras/stz1007 journal journal MNRAS \ volume 486 ,\ pages 3404 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    Ber c i c , author D

    author author L. Ber c i c , author D. Larson , author P. Whittlesey , author M. Maksimovi\' c , author S. T. \ Badman , author S. Landi , author L. Matteini , author S. D. \ Bale , author J. W. \ Bonnell , author A. W. \ Case , author T. Dudok de Wit , author K. Goetz , autho...

    doi

  49. [57]

    author author V. N. \ Tsytovich , author G. E. \ Morfill , \ and\ author H. Thomas ,\ 10.1134/1.1809401 journal journal Plasma Phys. Rep. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 816 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  50. [58]

    u ftinger , author M. Holmstr \

    author author K. G. \ Kislyakova , author C. P. \ Johnstone , author P. Odert , author N. V. \ Erkaev , author H. Lammer , author T. L \"u ftinger , author M. Holmstr \"o m , author M. L. \ Khodachenko , \ and\ author M. G \"u del ,\ 10.1051/0004-6361/201322933 journal journal...

    doi

  51. [59]

    Goertz , author F

    author author I. Goertz , author F. Greiner , \ and\ author A. Piel ,\ 10.1063/1.3541838 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ pages 013703 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  52. [60]

    Trottenberg , author B

    author author T. Trottenberg , author B. Brede , author D. Block , \ and\ author A. Piel ,\ 10.1063/1.1624834 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 10 ,\ pages 4627 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  53. [61]

    Douglass , author V

    author author A. Douglass , author V. Land , author L. Matthews , \ and\ author T. Hyde ,\ 10.1063/1.3624552 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ pages 083706 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.