Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bias-Aware Design for Informed Decisions: Raising Awareness of Self-Selection Bias in User Ratings and Reviews

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.08751 v1 pith:LQ7XVTRJ submitted 2022-09-19 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords biasdesignawarenessinformationreviewsself-selectionuserpeople
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

People often take user ratings and reviews into consideration when shopping for products or services online. However, such user-generated data contains self-selection bias that could affect people decisions and it is hard to resolve this issue completely by algorithms. In this work, we propose to raise the awareness of the self-selection bias by making three types of information concerning user ratings and reviews transparent. We distill these three pieces of information (reviewers experience, the extremity of emotion, and reported aspects) from the definition of self-selection bias and exploration of related literature. We further conduct an online survey to assess the perceptions of the usefulness of such information and identify the exact facets people care about in their decision process. Then, we propose a visual design to make such details behind user reviews transparent and integrate the design into an experimental website for evaluation. The results of a between-subjects study demonstrate that our bias-aware design significantly increases the awareness of bias and their satisfaction with decision-making. We further offer a series of design implications for improving information transparency and awareness of bias in user-generated content.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools