Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

A gravitational wave detectable candidate Type Ia supernova progenitor

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper identifies ATLAS J1138-5139 as a 27.68-minute accreting double white dwarf binary whose 1.02-solar-mass carbon-oxygen accretor is poised to explode as a Type Ia supernova, and shows that LISA can detect it.

desk verdict ATLAS J1138-5139 is a genuinely new, well-characterized ultracompact DWD binary with a convincing mass inference and the strongest LISA-detectable SN Ia progenitor claim to date; minor internal inconsistencies do not undermine it. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19916 v3 pith:LQRCEYGC submitted 2024-11-29 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

Emma T. Chickles , Kevin B. Burdge , Joheen Chakraborty , Vik S. Dhillon , Paul Draghis , Scott A. Hughes , James Munday , Saul A. Rappaport
show 32 more authors
John Tonry Evan Bauer Alex Brown Noel Castro Deepto Chakrabarty Martin Dyer Kareem El-Badry Anna Frebel Gabor Furesz James Garbutt Matthew J. Green Aaron Householder Daniel Jarvis Erin Kara Mark R. Kennedy Paul Kerry Stuart P Littlefair James McCormac Geoffrey Mo Mason Ng Steven Parsons Ingrid Pelisoli Eleanor Pike Thomas A. Prince George R. Ricker Jan van Roestel David Sahman Ken J. Shen Robert A. Simcoe Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay Andrew Vanderburg Tin Long Sunny Wong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords ultracompactbinarydoublewhitedwarfTypeIasupernovaprogenitorLISAgravitationalwavemasstransferRochelobeaccreting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that ATLAS J1138-5139 is the closest-yet look at a Type Ia supernova in the making: a 27.68-minute binary in which a 0.24-solar-mass helium-core white dwarf is spilling gas onto a 1.02-solar-mass carbon-oxygen white dwarf. It argues that the accretor already carries enough mass that a helium detonation on its surface could ignite a normal-luminosity Type Ia explosion within a few million years, or the system may instead settle into stable AM CVn mass transfer. Because the orbit is so compact, the pair emits gravitational waves strong enough for LISA to detect on its own, with a predicted signal-to-noise ratio of 6.51 over the four-year mission. If the identification holds, this is the first candidate Type Ia progenitor that LISA can find blindly, and it gives binary evolution models a measured mass-transfer configuration far closer to merger than any previously known system.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is Roche-lobe filling: the donor's mean density is locked to the orbital period by the standard relation $\bar\rho_{\rm donor} \approx 0.185\,\mathrm{g\,cm^{-3}}\,(P_{\rm orb}/\mathrm{day})^{-2}$ from the Roche-lobe approximation in the binary-star literature, so measuring the 27.68-minute period fixes the donor's mean density, and the distance combined with the hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarf SED fixes its radius and therefore its mass. That mass, fed into Kepler's mass function together with the measured radial-velocity semi-amplitude, gives the accretor mass without relying on detailed light-curve modeling. The supporting evidence for ongoing mass transfer is the light-curve morphology, namely unequal quadrature maxima and an asymmetric primary eclipse, which requires a hot spot on an accretion disk. The LISA signal is then computed from the standard gravitational-wave strain for a nearly monochromatic binary, scaled by the number of observed cycles and compared with LISA's sensitivity curve.

What would settle it

Measure the orbital period derivative from eclipse timings spread over several years. The claimed masses and gravitational-wave emission predict a specific, measurable period decay; observing no decay, or a decay rate incompatible with the predicted chirp mass, would show the system is not an interacting double white dwarf on the claimed track. Alternatively, high-resolution spectroscopy that fixes the donor's surface gravity to a value inconsistent with Roche-filling at a 27.68-minute period would break the mass chain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that ATLAS J1138-5139 is an ultracompact accreting double white dwarf binary, not a detached pair. Its 27.68-minute light curve shows ellipsoidal modulation, unequal maxima near quadrature, and asymmetric eclipses; the unequal maxima and eclipse shapes require an accretion disk with a hot spot where the mass stream strikes it, so the lower-mass star is Roche-lobe-filling and transferring mass. A joint fit to the parallax, the hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarf spectral energy distribution, and the radial-velocity semi-amplitude of 687.4 km/s yields a 1.02 ± 0.04 solar-mass carbon-oxygen accretor and a 0.24 ± 0.03 solar-mass helium-core donor in an orbit inclined at more than 76 degrees. At that accretor mass, models of helium-shell ignition predict a double-detonation Type Ia supernova rather than collapse, with the donor later ejected as a hypervelocity star; the same models admit a stable AM CVn outcome if the accretion rate stays low. The paper further shows that the system's chirp mass, distance, and orbital frequency place it above LISA's four-year sensitivity curve, with SNR 6.51.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the donor star exactly fills its Roche lobe and that its measured light comes from a clean hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarf; if the donor is even slightly detached, or its spectral energy distribution is contaminated by the accretion disk or hot spot, the inferred 1.02-solar-mass accretor could shift enough to change whether this is a Type Ia progenitor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • LISA should detect ATLAS J1138-5139 blindly at SNR 6.51 after four years, making it the first candidate Type Ia progenitor found by gravitational waves alone.
  • The system tests binary evolution models closer to merger than any previous candidate, allowing direct comparison of its measured orbital parameters and mass-transfer rate with theoretical predictions.
  • If the double-detonation pathway operates, the donor's hydrogen shell will be stripped over the next few million years and the donor could eventually be ejected as a hypervelocity helium white dwarf, similar to proposed survivors of such supernovae.
  • If the accretion rate stays low, the system instead evolves into a stably mass-transferring AM CVn binary with a widening orbit, so the same object discriminates between two possible fates.
  • Gravitational-wave detection alone cannot reveal which fate awaits; the paper emphasizes that electromagnetic follow-up remains necessary to classify such sources and connect them to the Type Ia rate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the Roche-filling assumption could come from measuring the orbital period derivative by eclipse timing over a few years; the claimed masses predict a gravitational-wave-driven period decay that a detached or SED-contaminated interpretation would not reproduce.
  • Because the mass determination leans on hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarf models, an independent constraint on the donor's surface gravity from high-resolution spectroscopy would either confirm the 1.02-solar-mass accretor or shift it out of the double-detonation window.
  • If LISA measures the chirp mass and inclination independently, comparing those with the electromagnetic masses would probe the physics of the accretion flow, something no current binary population model can test directly.
  • The same survey strategy that found this system could uncover a population of similar ultracompact accretors, in which case LISA's blind detection rate would constrain how much the double-degenerate channel contributes to the Type Ia supernova rate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery and multi-wavelength follow-up of ATLAS J1138-5139, an eclipsing double white dwarf binary with an orbital period of 27.68 minutes. Combining Gaia astrometry, SED fitting with hydrogen-atmosphere ELM white dwarf models, the Roche-filling mean-density relation, the measured radial velocity semi-amplitude, and an eclipse-based inclination constraint, the authors infer an accretor mass M1 = 1.02 ± 0.04 M⊙, a donor mass M2 = 0.24 ± 0.03 M⊙, a donor radius of 0.086 ± 0.003 R⊙, and a donor temperature of about 9350 K. They interpret the system as a carbon-oxygen white dwarf accreting from a helium-core white dwarf, estimate a gravitational-wave merger timescale of a few million years, predict a LISA signal-to-noise ratio of 6.51 over a four-year mission, and argue that this makes the system the first LISA-detectable candidate Type Ia supernova progenitor. The central mass derivation is internally consistent and uses independent observables, with the rotational broadening measurement serving as an external check.

Significance. If the inferred masses hold up, ATLAS J1138-5139 would be the most compact known candidate Type Ia supernova progenitor containing a roughly Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf, providing a rare direct test of double-degenerate and double-detonation progenitor models. The paper's methodology is a strength: the donor mass is tied to a period-based density relation and an SED-derived radius, the accretor mass follows from the binary mass function, and the predicted rotational broadening provides a falsifiable consistency check. The LISA SNR prediction is a concrete, testable claim that will be resolved by future observations. The main residual risks are systematic: possible contamination of the donor SED by the hot spot or accretion disk, and the interpretation of a quoted SNR of 6.51 as a 'blind detection' given typical LISA search thresholds. These do not invalidate the discovery but affect the strength of the central Type Ia progenitor and detectability claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods, 'Joint analysis and parameter estimation' (with main-text Eq. 1 and Figure 1)] The SED likelihood includes the Swift UVM2 point and assumes the observed flux is entirely from the hydrogen-atmosphere ELM donor, yet the light curve shows a hot spot contributing roughly 15% of the u_s-band flux. Because UVM2 at 2246 Å lies on the Wien tail of a 9350 K donor, even a small hot-spot or disk contribution can bias the inferred T2 and R2. Through the Roche-filling density relation (Eq. 1) and the mass function, a 10% overestimate of R2 changes M2 by about 30% and shifts M1 by roughly 0.08–0.14 M⊙, potentially moving the accretor below the mass range for typical-luminosity double-detonation SNe Ia. The independent v sin i measurement (237.3 ± 12.5 km/s) agrees with the predicted value at only about 0.8σ, and it was not included in the joint fit, so it does not by itself exclude a systematic R2 bias of this size. I request a sensitivity analysis that (i) includes v sin i as an additional likelihood term and (ii) refits the SED with UVM2 excluded or with a hot-spot/disk component added, reporting the resulting M1, M2, and R2 posteriors.
  2. [Main text, paragraph beginning 'The derived masses...' and Figure 4] The paper describes the source as 'well above the detection limit of LISA' and 'blindly detectable' with SNR = 6.51, but 6.51 is below the canonical SNR ≈ 7 threshold often adopted for blind searches of quasi-monochromatic Galactic binaries, and the trials factor associated with a full-sky frequency search is not discussed. Because the title and abstract hinge on gravitational-wave detectability, please state the detection criterion used, including the number of independent templates and the false-alarm probability. If SNR = 6.51 is indeed below the blind-search threshold, the wording should be softened to 'marginally detectable' or the detection probability should be quantified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text and Methods, 'LISA Analysis'] The main text quotes a merger time of about 5.5 Myr, while the Methods section states that the same formula and masses give τ = 8 Myr. Evaluating the provided formula with M1 = 1.02 M⊙, M2 = 0.24 M⊙, and P = 0.01922 days gives approximately 5.5 Myr, so the Methods statement appears to be a numerical error that should be corrected.
  2. [Main text, paragraph on mass determination] The sentence claiming the accretor mass is determined 'based solely on the Roche geometry and Kepler's laws' overstates the case, since the SED-derived donor radius and the Gaia distance are essential inputs; I suggest rewording to 'based on the Roche geometry, the SED-derived donor radius, and Kepler's laws.'
  3. [Methods, 'Kinematic Analysis' and Extended Data Figure 7] The text says the system orbits between 1.2 and 2.7 kpc from the Galactic center, but the orbit plot in Extended Data Figure 7 shows the Galactocentric radius ranging from about 3.0 to 7.5 kpc; this looks like a typo and should be harmonized.
  4. [Methods, 'Dust extinction analysis'] The text quotes the observed distance as 557 pc, whereas Table 1 gives 553+16/−18 pc and Figure 3 gives 552+18/−17 pc; the three values should be made consistent.
  5. [Methods, 'ULTRACAM observation' and 'Joint analysis'] There are minor typographical issues, including 'serveral' for 'several' and the duplicated 'from from' in the joint analysis section; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: masses are derived from independent EM observables, and LISA SNR, merger time, and vsini are forward predictions.

full rationale

The central parameter derivation is self-contained and not circular. The donor mass M2 is obtained by combining the Gaia parallax distance with an ELM model-atmosphere fit to the observed SED and the Roche-filling mean-density relation (Eq. 1, rho ≈ 0.185 (P/day)^-2); the accretor mass M1 then follows from the binary mass function using the measured RV semi-amplitude K2 = 687.4 ± 3.8 km/s and the eclipse inclination bound i > 76 deg. None of these inputs is set to the claimed output masses, and the paper explicitly excludes the light-curve model and the rotational broadening measurement from the joint fit. The predicted donor rotational velocity (vsini = 226 ± 8 km/s) agrees with an independently measured value (237.3 ± 12.5 km/s), providing a genuine external check on R2 and hence on the masses. The LISA SNR (6.51) and the merger time are forward calculations from the inferred chirp mass, distance, and period using standard GW formulae; no LISA detection or SNR threshold was used as an input. The double-detonation SN Ia interpretation does cite prior work by co-authors (Shen 2015, Bauer et al. 2021, El-Badry et al. 2023), but that work is externally published and is corroborated by non-overlapping references (Woosley & Kasen 2011; Neunteufel et al. 2016; Ruiter et al. 2009); the interpretation is an application of existing models, not a result derived from a self-citation chain. A minor internal discrepancy between the main-text merger time (5.5 Myr) and the Methods value (8 Myr) is a numerical/typographical error, not a circular dependency. Possible SED contamination by the disk/hot spot is a systematic uncertainty in the donor radius, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The mass measurement rests on standard binary theory (Kepler, Roche geometry) and domain assumptions about the donor atmosphere and the double detonation pathway. No new particles, forces, or exotic objects are introduced; the accretion disk and hot spot are inferred from the light curve, not invented.

free parameters (5)
  • Donor temperature T2 = 9359 K
    Fitted to the SED using hydrogen-atmosphere ELM white dwarf models; directly sets the donor radius and thus both masses.
  • Distance d = 552 pc
    Fitted to Gaia parallax and the SED normalization; scales the donor radius and luminosity.
  • Inclination cos i = i > 76 deg (cos i truncated)
    Constrained by the presence of eclipses; enters the mass function and strongly affects the accretor mass.
  • Accretor mass M1 = 1.02 Msun
    Output of the joint fit combining the radial velocity mass function with the donor mass and inclination; the central parameter for the SN Ia claim.
  • Donor mass M2 = 0.24 Msun
    Derived from the Roche-filling mean density and the fitted donor radius; needed for the mass ratio and merger time.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Kepler's third law and the binary mass function relate P, K2, and the masses.
    Used in the joint analysis to convert the measured radial velocity semi-amplitude into a mass constraint.
  • domain assumption The donor star exactly fills its Roche lobe, so its mean density is fixed by the orbital period (Eggleton's approximation).
    Main text Eq. 1; this is the basis for deriving the donor radius and mass from the period and SED.
  • domain assumption ELM white dwarf atmosphere models (Tremblay & Bergeron) with H-dominated composition represent the donor's SED.
    Used in the SED fit in Methods; contamination by the accretion disk or hot spot would bias the result.
  • domain assumption The presence of eclipses implies an orbital inclination above 76 degrees.
    Used to truncate the prior on cos i in the joint analysis; a lower inclination would raise M1.
  • domain assumption The double detonation model (Shen 2015) applies: a helium detonation on a ~1 Msun C/O white dwarf triggers a carbon detonation and a normal Type Ia supernova.
    This model is the basis for interpreting the system as a Type Ia progenitor; if incorrect, the system may instead merge or form an R CrB star.
  • domain assumption Orbital decay is driven purely by gravitational radiation, with no significant tidal or third-body effects.
    Used to compute the 5.5 Myr merger timescale from the measured masses and period.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A gravitational wave detectable candidate Type Ia supernova progenitor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LQRCEYGC

@misc{pith2026241119916,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A gravitational wave detectable candidate Type Ia supernova progenitor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LQRCEYGC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19916}
}
read the original abstract

Type Ia supernovae, critical for studying cosmic expansion, arise from thermonuclear explosions of white dwarfs, but their precise progenitor pathways remain unclear. Growing evidence supports the ``double-degenerate'' scenario, where two white dwarfs interact. The absence of other companion types capable of explaining the observed Ia rate, along with observations of hyper-velocity white dwarfs interpreted as surviving companions of such systems provide compelling evidence in favor of this scenario. Upcoming millihertz gravitational wave observatories like the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) are expected to detect thousands of double-degenerate systems, though the most compact known candidate Ia progenitors produce only marginally detectable gravitational wave signals. Here, we report observations of ATLAS J1138-5139, a binary white dwarf system with an orbital period of 28 minutes. Our analysis reveals a 1 solar mass carbon-oxygen white dwarf accreting from a helium-core white dwarf. Given its mass, the accreting carbon-oxygen white dwarf is poised to trigger a typical-luminosity Type Ia supernova within a few million years, or to evolve into a stably mass-transferring AM CVn system. ATLAS J1138-5139 provides a rare opportunity to calibrate binary evolution models by directly comparing observed orbital parameters and mass transfer rates closer to merger than any previously identified candidate Type Ia progenitor. Its compact orbit ensures detectability by LISA, demonstrating the potential of millihertz gravitational wave observatories to reveal a population of Type Ia progenitors on a Galactic scale, paving the way for multi-messenger studies offering insights into the origins of these cosmologically significant explosions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19916 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Light curve of ATLAS J1138-5139. a) The binned usgsrs ULTRACAM light curve of ATLAS J1138-5139, phase-folded on the 27.68-min orbital period. The light curve exhibits sinusoidal variations, with maxima at phases 0.25 and 0.75, due to an ellipsoidally deformed secondary star. At phase 0.75, a heated accretion feature contributes additional flux, resulting in the appearance of unequal maxima. b) The asymmetric primary… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Optical spectroscopy and broadband photometry of ATLAS J1138-5139. a) A sinusoidal fit to the measured radial velocities of the donor star in ATLAS J1138-5139, with a best-fit velocity semi-amplitude of K2 = 687.4 ± 3.8 km s−1 and systemic velocity of γ = 125.0 ± 3.0 km s−1 . b) Optical spectrum of ATLAS J1138-5139 coadded in the rest frame of the donor star. Overlaid on the Ca II K line is a best-fit model of a Cal… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Constraints on the component masses, donor temperature and radius, and distance. a) Corner plots for the fitting procedure. We simultaneously fit the SED data with the Gaia astrometric constraint, and the spectroscopic radial velocity constraint, but assuming the same density since the donor is filling its Roche lobe. b) Outcomes of interacting double white dwarf binaries from Shen 201526, with the posterior distrib… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 4-year LISA sensitivity curve detectability showing that ATLAS J1138-5139 will [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Interstellar dust extinction maps illustrating the extinction along the line of sight to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three color ULTRACAM light curve from March 20, 2023, overlaid with the best-fit toy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A set of panels depicting the orbit of ATLAS J1138-5139 around the Milky Way over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Riess, A. G. et al. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. ”Astron. J. ”116, 1009–1038 (1998). astro-ph/9805201

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Schmidt, B. P. et al. The High-Z Supernova Search: Measuring Cosmic Deceleration and Global Curvature of the Universe Using Type IA Supernovae.Astrophys. J.507, 46–63 (1998). astro-ph/9805200

    arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    & Fowler, W

    Hoyle, F. & Fowler, W. A. Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 132, 565 (1960)

    work page 1960

  4. [4]

    & Tutukov, A

    Iben, J., I. & Tutukov, A. V . Supernovae of type I as end products of the evolution of binaries with components of moderate initial mass. Astrophys. J. Supp. 54, 335–372 (1984)

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    Webbink, R. F. Double white dwarfs as progenitors of R Coronae Borealis stars and type I supernovae. Astrophys. J. 277, 355–360 (1984)

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    Shen, K. J. et al. Three Hypervelocity White Dwarfs in Gaia DR2: Evidence for Dynamically Driven Double-degenerate Double-detonation Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 865, 15 (2018). 1804.11163

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    El-Badry, K. et al. The fastest stars in the Galaxy. The Open Journal of Astrophysics 6, 28 (2023). 2306.03914

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Amaro-Seoane, P. et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna.arXiv e-prints arXiv:1702.00786 (2017). 1702.00786

    arXiv 2017

Show all 61 references
  1. [12]

    Dhillon, V . et al. ULTRACAM – an ultra-fast, triple-beam CCD camera. In G ¨ansicke, B. T., Beuermann, K. & Reinsch, K. (eds.) The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, vol. 261 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , 672 (2002). astro-ph/0110020

    2002 arXiv

  2. [13]

    Wilsey, N. J. & Beaky, M. M. Revisiting the O’Connell Effect in Eclipsing Binary Systems. Society for Astronomical Sciences Annual Symposium 28, 107 (2009)

    2009

  3. [14]

    Shakura, N. I. & Postnov, K. A. Doppler-effect modulation of the observed radiation flux from ultracompact binary stars. Astron. Astrophys. 183, L21–L22 (1987)

    1987

  4. [16]

    Maxted, P. F. L., Marsh, T. R. & North, R. C. KPD 1930+2752: a candidate Type Ia supernova progenitor. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 317, L41–L44 (2000). astro-ph/0007257

    2000 arXiv

  5. [17]

    Geier, S. et al. The hot subdwarf B + white dwarf binary KPD 1930+2752. A supernova type Ia progenitor candidate. Astron. Astrophys. 464, 299–307 (2007). astro-ph/0609742

    2007 arXiv

  6. [18]

    Rodr ´ıguez-Gil, P. et al. The orbital period of V458 Vulpeculae, a post-double common-envelope nova. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 407, L21–L25 (2010). 1006.1075. 15

    2010 arXiv

  7. [19]

    Pelisoli, I. et al. A hot subdwarf-white dwarf super-Chandrasekhar candidate supernova Ia progenitor. Nature Astronomy 5, 1052–1061 (2021). 2107.09074

    2021 arXiv

  8. [20]

    Howell, D. A. et al. The type Ia supernova SNLS-03D3bb from a super-Chandrasekhar-mass white dwarf star. Nature 443, 308–311 (2006). astro-ph/0609616

    2006 arXiv

  9. [21]

    & Maoz, D

    Badenes, C. & Maoz, D. The Merger Rate of Binary White Dwarfs in the Galactic Disk. Astrophys. J. Lett. 749, L11 (2012). 1202.5472

    2012 arXiv

  10. [22]

    & Nomoto, K

    Saio, H. & Nomoto, K. Off-Center Carbon Ignition in Rapidly Rotating, Accreting Carbon-Oxygen White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 615, 444–449 (2004). astro-ph/0401141

    2004 arXiv

  11. [23]

    B., Chandra, V ., Shen, K

    Bauer, E. B., Chandra, V ., Shen, K. J. & Hermes, J. J. Masses of White Dwarf Binary Companions to Type Ia Supernovae Measured from Runaway Velocities. Astrophys. J. Lett. 923, L34 (2021). 2112.03189

    2021 arXiv

  12. [24]

    Woosley, S. E. & Kasen, D. Sub-Chandrasekhar Mass Models for Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 734, 38 (2011). 1010.5292

    2011 arXiv

  13. [25]

    Neunteufel, P., Yoon, S. C. & Langer, N. Models for the evolution of close binaries with He-star and white dwarf components towards Type Ia supernova explosions. Astron. Astrophys. 589, A43 (2016). 1603.00768

    2016 arXiv

  14. [26]

    Shen, K. J. Every Interacting Double White Dwarf Binary May Merge. Astrophys. J. Lett. 805, L6 (2015). 1502.05052. 16

    2015 arXiv

  15. [27]

    J., Belczynski, K

    Ruiter, A. J., Belczynski, K. & Fryer, C. Rates and Delay Times of Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 699, 2026–2036 (2009). 0904.3108

    2009 arXiv

  16. [28]

    & de Mink, S

    Wagg, T., Breivik, K. & de Mink, S. E. LEGWORK: A Python Package for Computing the Evolution and Detectability of Stellar-origin Gravitational-wave Sources with Space-based Detectors. Astrophys. J. Supp. 260, 52 (2022). 2111.08717

    2022 arXiv

  17. [29]

    Gaia Data Release 3

    Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 674, A1 (2023). 2208.00211

    2023 arXiv

  18. [30]

    Burdge, K. et al. An 8.8 Minute Orbital Period Eclipsing Detached Double White Dwarf Binary. Astrophysical Journal Letters 905, L7 (2020). 2010.03555

    2020 arXiv

  19. [31]

    Chakraborty, J. et al. Expanding the ultracompacts: gravitational wave-driven mass transfer in the shortest-period binaries with accretion disks. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2411.12796 (2024). 2411.12796

    2024 arXiv

  20. [32]

    Kupfer, T. et al. LISA Galactic Binaries with Astrometry from Gaia DR3. Astrophysical Journal 963, 100 (2024). 2302.12719. 17 Acknowledgements K.B.B. is a former Pappalardo Postdoctoral Fellow in Physics at MIT and thanks the Pappalardo fellowship program for supporting his re...

    2024 arXiv

  21. [33]

    VanderPlas, J. T. Understanding the Lomb-Scargle Periodogram. Astrophys. J. Supp. 236, 16 (2018). 1703.09824

    2018 arXiv

  22. [34]

    & Mazeh, T

    Kov ´acs, G., Zucker, S. & Mazeh, T. A box-fitting algorithm in the search for periodic transits. Astron. Astrophys. 391, 369–377 (2002). astro-ph/0206099

    2002 arXiv

  23. [35]

    Burdge, K. B. et al. A Systematic Search of Zwicky Transient Facility Data for Ultracompact Binary LISA-detectable Gravitational-wave Sources. Astrophys. J. 905, 32 (2020). 2009. 02567

    2020

  24. [36]

    van Roestel, J. et al. Discovery and characterization of five new eclipsing AM CVn systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 512, 5440–5461 (2022). 2107.07573

    2022 arXiv

  25. [37]

    Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. Pub. Ast. Soc. Pac. 130, 064505 (2018). 1802.00879

    2018 arXiv

  26. [38]

    Ricker, G. R. et al. Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 1, 014003 (2015)

    2015

  27. [39]

    Gentile Fusillo, N. P. et al. VizieR Online Data Catalog: Catalogue of white dwarfs in Gaia EDR3 (Gentile+, 2021). VizieR Online Data Catalog J/MNRAS/508/3877 (2021)

    2021

  28. [40]

    Huang, C. X. et al. Photometry of 10 Million Stars from the First Two Years of TESS Full Frame Images: Part I. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 4, 204 (2020). 2011.06459. 35

    2020 arXiv

  29. [41]

    Feinstein, A. D. et al. eleanor: An Open-source Tool for Extracting Light Curves from the TESS Full-frame Images. Pub. Ast. Soc. Pac. 131, 094502 (2019). 1903.09152

    2019 arXiv

  30. [42]

    & Brandt, T

    Han, T. & Brandt, T. D. TESS-Gaia Light Curve: A PSF-based TESS FFI Light-curve Product. ”Astron. J. ”165, 71 (2023). 2301.03704

    2023

  31. [43]

    Prochaska, J. X. et al. Pypeit: The python spectroscopic data reduction pipeline. Journal of Open Source Software 5, 2308 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.21105/joss. 02308

    2020 doi

  32. [44]

    Prochaska, J. X. et al. pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 (2020)

    2020

  33. [45]

    Dhillon, V . S. et al. ULTRACAM: an ultrafast, triple-beam CCD camera for high-speed astrophysics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 378, 825–840 (2007). 0704.2557

    2007 arXiv

  34. [46]

    The DECaPS footprint covers the Galactic plane accessible in the southern hemisphere with δ ≤ −24◦ and contains 3.32 billion sources

    is an optical survey in the grizY bands with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam; 47) on the 4m Blanco telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory(CITO). The DECaPS footprint covers the Galactic plane accessible in the southern hemisphere with δ ≤ −24◦ and contains 3.32...

    2023

  35. [47]

    Saydjari, A. K. et al. The Dark Energy Camera Plane Survey 2 (DECaPS2): More Sky, Less Bias, and Better Uncertainties. Astrophys. J. Supp. 264, 28 (2023). 2206.11909

    2023 arXiv

  36. [48]

    Flaugher, B. et al. The Dark Energy Camera. ”Astron. J. ”150, 150 (2015). 1504.02900

    2015 arXiv

  37. [49]

    HEAsoft: Unified Release of FTOOLS and XANADU

    Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (Heasarc). HEAsoft: Unified Release of FTOOLS and XANADU. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1408.004 (2014)

    2014

  38. [50]

    Burdge, K. B. et al. Orbital Decay in an Accreting and Eclipsing 13.7 Minute Orbital Period Binary with a Luminous Donor. Astrophys. J. Lett. 953, L1 (2023). 2303.13573. 36

    2023 arXiv

  39. [51]

    Edenhofer, G. et al. A parsec-scale Galactic 3D dust map out to 1.25 kpc from the Sun.Astron. Astrophys. 685, A82 (2024). 2308.01295

    2024 arXiv

  40. [52]

    Tremblay, P. E. & Bergeron, P. Spectroscopic Analysis of DA White Dwarfs: Stark Broadening of Hydrogen Lines Including Nonideal Effects. Astrophys. J. 696, 1755–1770 (2009). 0902.4182

    2009 arXiv

  41. [53]

    E., Bergeron, P

    Tremblay, P. E., Bergeron, P. & Gianninas, A. An Improved Spectroscopic Analysis of DA White Dwarfs from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 4. Astrophys. J. 730, 128 (2011). 1102.0056

    2011 arXiv

  42. [54]

    Eggleton, P. P. Aproximations to the radii of Roche lobes. Astrophys. J. 268, 368–369 (1983)

    1983

  43. [55]

    Copperwheat, C. M. et al. Physical properties of IP Pegasi: an eclipsing dwarf nova with an unusually cool white dwarf. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.402, 1824–1840 (2010). 0911.1637

    2010 arXiv

  44. [56]

    & Salpeter, E

    Hamada, T. & Salpeter, E. E. Models for Zero-Temperature Stars. Astrophys. J. 134, 683 (1961)

    1961

  45. [57]

    Claret, A. et al. VizieR Online Data Catalog: Limb-darkening coefficients for compact stars (Claret+, 2020). VizieR On-line Data Catalog: J/A+A/634/A93. Originally published in: 2020A&A...634A..93C (2020)

    2020

  46. [58]

    Bobylev, V . V . & Bajkova, A. T. Estimation of the Radial Scale Length and Vertical Scale Height of the Galactic Thin Disk from Cepheids. Astronomy Letters 47, 534–543 (2021). 2110.11203. 37

    2021 arXiv

  47. [59]

    galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics

    Bovy, J. galpy: A python Library for Galactic Dynamics. Astrophys. J. Supp. 216, 29 (2015). 1412.3451

    2015 arXiv

  48. [60]

    & van der Sluys, M

    Shah, S., Nelemans, G. & van der Sluys, M. Using electromagnetic observations to aid gravitational-wave parameter estimation of compact binaries observed with LISA. II. The effect of knowing the sky position. Astron. Astrophys. 553, A82 (2013). 1303.6116

    2013 arXiv

  49. [61]

    & Nelemans, G

    Shah, S., van der Sluys, M. & Nelemans, G. Using electromagnetic observations to aid gravitational-wave parameter estimation of compact binaries observed with LISA. Astron. Astrophys. 544, A153 (2012). 1207.6770

    2012 arXiv

  50. [62]

    Taylor, J. H. & Weisberg, J. M. Further Experimental Tests of Relativistic Gravity Using the Binary Pulsar PSR 1913+16. Astrophys. J. 345, 434 (1989)

    1989

  51. [63]

    J., Cole, R

    Moore, C. J., Cole, R. H. & Berry, C. P. L. Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves. Classical and Quantum Gravity 32, 015014 (2015). 1408.0740

    2015 arXiv

  52. [64]

    Piro, A. L. Tidal Interactions in Merging White Dwarf Binaries. Astrophys. J. Lett. 740, L53 (2011). 1108.3110

    2011 arXiv

  53. [65]

    P., Mathews, J

    Kraft, R. P., Mathews, J. & Greenstein, J. L. Binary Stars among Cataclysmic Variables. II. Nova WZ Sagittae: a Possible Radiator of Gravitational Waves. Astrophys. J. 136, 312–315 (1962). 38 Instrument Filter Date # of Exposures Exposure Time ULTRACAM Super u’ Mar 8 2023 649 ...

    1962

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.