Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 32 references

Measurement of the X-ARAPUCA's Absolute Photon Detection Efficiency for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment's Vertical Drift Far Detector

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The X-ARAPUCA photon detector for DUNE's Vertical Drift module reaches an absolute efficiency of 3.7% at 4.5 V overvoltage, enough for the experiment's physics goals.

desk verdict Solid two-method absolute PDE measurement for DUNE's VD X-ARAPUCA; the no-filter gain is real, but the absolute scale leans on one external SiPM calibration. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.12328 v2 pith:LT4MF3JI submitted 2025-11-15 physics.ins-det hep-ex

G. Botogoske , F. Bruni , E. Calvo , R. Calabrese , N. Canci , A. Canto , C.M. Cattadori , A. Cervera Villanueva
show 36 more authors
S. Coleman J.I. Crespo-Anadón C. Cuesta F. Di Capua N. Durand G. Fiorillo F. Galizzi I. Gil-Botella C. Gotti G. Grauso J. Jablonski A.A. Machado S. Manthey Corchado J. Martín-Albo G. Matteucci L. Meazza A.P. Mendoça A. Minotti D. Navas-Nicolás L. Pagliuso C. Palomares L. Pérez-Molina V. Pimentel I. López de Rego Z. Rautio J. Romeo-Araujo D. Rudik E. Segreto Y. Suvorov M. Sturdivant F. Terranova J. Ureña A. Verdugo de Osa D. Warner R. Wilson K. Zhu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-dethep-ex PACS 29.40.Mc85.60.Gz95.55.Vj
keywords X-ARAPUCAphotondetectionefficiencyliquidargonDUNEverticaldriftsiliconphotomultiplierdichroicfilterwavelengthshifterscintillationlight
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the absolute photon-detection efficiency (PDE) of the X-ARAPUCA light collector proposed for DUNE's Vertical Drift far detector, measured directly in liquid argon under cryogenic conditions. The baseline single-sided design reaches a PDE of 3.7 ± 0.3% at 4.5 V overvoltage, above the >3% value DUNE needs to meet its 20 PE/MeV light-yield requirement; a second, independent simulation-based method gives a compatible 3.1 ± 0.5%. The paper also shows that removing the dichroic filters improves efficiency by up to 18% because the filters' transmittance losses outweigh their photon-recycling benefit, and recommends dropping them from the baseline. These results matter because they validate a simpler and cheaper photon-detection design while demonstrating a methodology that cancels common biases by comparing the device under test against a calibrated reference sensor.

What carries the argument

The measurement rests on the X-ARAPUCA device itself—a wavelength-shifting light guide (PMMA doped with a chromophore) with an external p-terphenyl coating that converts 127 nm argon scintillation light to ~350 nm, traps re-emitted visible light by total internal reflection, and delivers it to 160 SiPMs. The efficiency is extracted through two independent methods. The reference method compares the XA's detected photoelectrons against those of a calibrated reference SiPM (known PDE of 12.69 ± 1.12% at 127 nm, 87 K, 4 V overvoltage) using a Geant4-simulated geometrical factor that cancels global light-yield biases; the simulation method instead computes the absolute number of incident photons

What would settle it

Re-measure the reference SiPM's PDE directly at 127 nm in liquid argon at the actual incidence angles of this setup (~75°) rather than using the liquid-xenon-based angle correction; if the resulting reference PDE differs from the assumed 12.1%, the X-ARAPUCA's absolute PDE values in Table 9 shift by that factor. Alternatively, run the reference-method comparison with a different calibrated reference device (e.g., a second SiPM model or a photodiode-based detector) and check that the XA PDE remains 3.7% at 4.5 V overvoltage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the X-ARAPUCA baseline configuration for DUNE's Vertical Drift module meets the experiment's photon-detection requirements: the reference method measures an absolute PDE of (3.7 ± 0.3)% at 4.5 V overvoltage, and the independent simulation method measures (3.1 ± 0.5)%, with the two agreeing within uncertainties. The paper further claims that the dichroic filters included in the baseline design to re-reflect escaping photons actually reduce efficiency: removing them produces an 18% improvement for the single-sided configuration and an 11% improvement for the double-sided one, with the best configuration reaching (4.5 ± 0.4)% at 4.5 V. On this basis the authors recomme

Load-bearing premise

The absolute efficiency numbers depend on the previously measured efficiency of the reference SiPMs (12.69 ± 1.12% at 127 nm, 87 K, 4 V overvoltage) and on transferring its angle dependence from liquid xenon to liquid argon; if that external calibration is systematically wrong, every absolute PDE value shifts proportionally.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • DUNE's Vertical Drift photon detection system can meet the 20 PE/MeV light-yield requirement with the current X-ARAPUCA design: the measured 3.7% PDE exceeds the needed >3%.
  • The dichroic-filter-free X-ARAPUCA becomes the recommended baseline; it is simpler and cheaper while improving efficiency by up to 18%.
  • Single- and double-sided X-ARAPUCAs are compatible in efficiency, so cathode-mounted double-sided devices do not pay an efficiency penalty.
  • The two-method cross-check establishes a repeatable procedure for qualifying future photon-detector designs for DUNE against an absolute PDE target.
  • No efficiency gain comes from the alternative 24 mg/kg, 5.5 mm light guide, though its flatter position response could improve event reconstruction uniformity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because all absolute PDE values inherit the reference SiPM's calibration, a systematic error in that calibration would shift every number proportionally; the relative comparisons (e.g., the 18% gain from removing dichroic filters) would survive such an error.
  • The 18% improvement attributed to dichroic-filter transmittance losses suggests a concrete design lever: further gains may come from increasing the reflectivity of the non-active surfaces (the VIKUITI film) or from dichroic filters with sharper cut-offs and higher transmittance, rather than from removing the filters alone.
  • The flatter position response of the alternative light guide implies that a configuration with slightly lower mean PDE could still yield better physics performance if uniformity matters more than peak efficiency; a detector-level light-yield simulation could test this.
  • A natural testable extension is to reproduce the absolute measurement with a third, independent calibration—for instance a calibrated photodiode or a different reference SiPM batch—to verify the 3.7% central value without relying on the liquid-xenon angle-dependence correction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports laboratory measurements of the absolute photon-detection efficiency (PDE) of the X-ARAPUCA photosensor proposed for DUNE's Vertical Drift far detector. Two independent methods are used: a 'reference method' at CIEMAT, which normalizes the XA signal to two calibrated HPK VUV4 SiPMs and a Geant4 geometrical factor, and a 'simulation method' at INFN Naples, which derives the absolute number of incident photons from a Geant4 simulation with liquid-argon purity and light-guide bending corrections. For the baseline single-sided XA at 4.5 V overvoltage, the two methods give 3.7±0.3% and 3.1±0.5%, respectively, compatible within ~1σ. Several alternative configurations are also measured; the configuration without dichroic filters reaches 4.5±0.4% at 4.5 V, and the paper claims improvements of up to 18% (single-sided) or 11% (double-sided) relative to the filtered baseline. Based on these results, the authors recommend removing the dichroic filter from the DUNE VD baseline design. An alternative WLS light-guide geometry shows no significant absolute-PDE improvement but a flatter position response.

Significance. If the absolute values are correct, this is an important result for the DUNE photon-detection system: it indicates that the VD baseline XA meets the >3% PDE requirement and that the design can be simplified by removing the dichroic filters. The paper's strengths include two independent cryogenic setups, an explicit error budget, repeated measurements with demonstrated stability, and the confirmation of a simulation-driven prediction about the dichroic-filter loss. The relative noDF-vs-DF comparisons are largely insensitive to the external SiPM calibration, which makes the design recommendation more robust than the absolute numbers. However, the absolute PDE scale rests on a single external calibration and a liquid-xenon angle-transfer, the headline 18% improvement is not a same-substrate comparison, and the simulation-method cross-check depends on a post-hoc bending correction. These caveats limit the strength of the absolute compliance claim and of the claimed cross-validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1, §2.2, Eq. (2); §5.1 error budget] The absolute PDE scale of the reference method is proportional to ε_ref, the previously measured HPK VUV4 PDE of (12.69±1.12)% at 127 nm, 87 K, 4 V OV [20], rescaled to 12.1±1.1% using an average incidence angle from a liquid-xenon measurement [22]. The error budget in §5.1 lists this external calibration as the dominant 8.7% term, and the paper performs no independent check of this scale. The simulation method could in principle cross-check it, but its dominant correction f_bending=0.58±0.08 is post-hoc (see below), so the 3.7±0.3 vs 3.1±0.5 agreement cannot exclude a systematic shift of ~19% in ε_ref, which would put the filtered baseline below the DUNE >3% threshold. Please quantify this sensitivity and either provide an independent anchor or temper the absolute compliance claim.
  2. [§2.3 Table 4; §5.3 Table 10] The headline 18% noDF-vs-DF improvement for the single-sided configuration compares Configuration 1 (DF, ZAOT substrate) with Configuration 3 (noDF, P.E. substrate). These differ by two variables, so the improvement cannot be attributed solely to filter removal. The controlled same-substrate comparison is the double-sided Configuration 2 vs 4 (both ZAOT), which gives 11%. The abstract and conclusion should quote the DS comparison as the primary evidence for removing the DF, or report a substrate-corrected SS number; otherwise 'up to 18%' overstates the filter effect.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (8)] The simulation method relies on a bending correction f_bending=0.58±0.08 characterized after data-taking, with the text acknowledging the bending 'might have been more dramatic during the data taking.' This is a post-hoc normalization of the INFN data; together with its ~14% uncertainty it weakens the claimed cross-check of the reference method. The authors should present the simulation-method results with and without this correction, or treat the cross-check as qualitative rather than as an independent validation of the absolute scale.
  4. [§2.2, Eq. (3), Table 3] Eq. (3) states f_geo = MC_ref/MC_XA = 0.0465±0.0007, but the values given in Table 3 and the text are MC_ref=603±7 and MC_XA=25,900±238, whose ratio is 0.0233, not 0.0465. Since the reference-method PDE is proportional to f_geo, this factor-of-two discrepancy directly affects all absolute values in Table 9. Please clarify the definition (e.g., per-SiPM vs summed, or an additional area factor) or correct the value; if the raw MC ratio is the intended f_geo, the absolute PDEs would shift by a factor of two.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract reads '4.5±4%' but the correct value is 4.5±0.4%; the decimal point is missing.
  2. [Table 4] The substrate designation 'P.E.' is never defined. Please spell out the material and, if relevant, note whether it is the same substrate as ZAOT apart from the dichroic coating.
  3. [§1.3, Eq. (1)] Typo: 'uncertaty' should be 'uncertainty'.
  4. [§5.3] When combining the three overvoltage measurements in Table 10, the statement that 'the overvoltage choice should have no impact on the relative PDE' is an assumption; please justify it or show that the three rows are compatible within their uncertainties before averaging.
  5. [§6] The figure of merit 'PDE times Surface over #SiPM' (26 vs 83) is not defined in this paper; please define it or give a reference for this metric.
  6. [References] Reference [17] is cited as 'Manuscript in preparation'; please replace it with a citable publication or, if unavailable, note that the result is preliminary.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PDE values are measurements anchored to external calibrations, not reductions to the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central result is an experimental measurement, not a derivation that returns its inputs. The reference method (Eq. 2) determines PDE_XA from the ratio of PE counts and a geometric factor times the independently measured reference SiPM PDE of (12.69±1.12)% from ref [20]; that calibration is external to this paper's target and does not contain the XA PDE. The simulation method (Eq. 5) uses a forward Geant4 simulation with literature light-yield assumptions and explicit purity and bending corrections; those corrections are model/calibration inputs, not the output being claimed. The no-dichroic-filter improvement (Table 10) was previously predicted from simulation and is now confirmed experimentally, so it is a genuine prediction rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a result. The limitations the paper itself states—the dominant 8.7% reference-SiPM uncertainty, the angle-dependence taken from liquid-xenon measurements [22], and the post-hoc bending correction f_bending=0.58±0.08—are accuracy and model risks, not circular steps that make the conclusion equivalent to its assumptions. There is no load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem that forces the result; the two independent methods provide a genuine cross-check, even if their agreement is loose.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The measurement rests on a chain of calibration inputs: a previously measured reference-SiPM PDE (dominating the ~9% absolute uncertainty), literature light-yield values, and two correction factors (purity, bending) derived from ancillary data. No new entities are introduced. The relative comparisons (DF vs noDF) cancel most of these inputs and are consequently more robust than the absolute PDE scale.

free parameters (6)
  • Reference SiPM PDE (HPK VUV4, 127 nm, 87 K, 4 V OV) = 12.69±1.12%
    Input from ref [20] into Eq. (2); scales every absolute PDE value in Table 9. Not fitted here, but a calibration input the central claim depends on.
  • Alpha-quench light yield for 241Am in LAr = 51,000 γ/MeV × 0.7 quenching factor
    Used in the Geant4 simulations (Sec. 2.2, 3.1) to compute the true photon number for geometry factors and the simulation method; the 0.7 quenching factor is chosen from literature.
  • Purity correction f_purity = 0.94±0.06
    Eq. (7); derived from measured slow-component lifetime (1217±50 ns) and literature intrinsic lifetime; correction factor for the simulation method.
  • Bending correction f_bending = 0.58±0.08
    Eq. (5); post-hoc geometry-based correction for the INFN setup; the paper states the bend might have been more severe during data-taking.
  • Geometrical factor f_geo = 0.0465±0.0007
    Eq. (3); from Geant4 simulation of the characterization box; used in the reference method.
  • Angle correction for reference SiPM PDE = 12.69% → 12.1±1.1%
    Applies the incidence-angle dependence from ref [22] (measured in liquid xenon) to the reference method's normalization.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption LAr scintillation light yield is 51,000 γ/MeV with a 0.7 quenching factor for alpha particles
    Used in the characterization box and Naples Geant4 simulations (Sec. 2.2, 3.1) to compute the true photon count; if wrong, f_geo and simulation-method PDE shift.
  • domain assumption The reference SiPM PDE and its angle dependence (refs [20,22]) are valid at 87 K in this setup
    Anchors the reference method's absolute scale (Eq. 2); the angle dependence is measured in liquid xenon, not argon.
  • domain assumption Geant4 simulations accurately model photon transport in the characterization box and cryostat, including fully absorbing walls and isotropic emission
    Underpins both f_geo (Eq. 3) and the simulation method's MC photon count (Eq. 5); unvalidated against an external benchmark in this paper.
  • domain assumption The dichroic-filter transmittance curves (ZAOT) measured in demineralised water at room temperature are representative of their cryogenic behavior
    Used to motivate the no-DF comparison (Fig. 5, Sec. 1.2).
  • ad hoc to paper The catenary bending model and the 0.58 correction factor hold during data-taking
    Sec. 3.2: the paper explicitly assumes the correction holds although the bend might have been more dramatic during the run.
  • domain assumption The black-box walls and Delrin lining absorb all incident photons, so no reflected light reaches the sensors
    Needed for both simulation and reference methods to directly relate simulated photon counts to measured PE counts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Measurement of the X-ARAPUCA's Absolute Photon Detection Efficiency for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment's Vertical Drift Far Detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LT4MF3JI

@misc{pith2026251112328,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Measurement of the X-ARAPUCA's Absolute Photon Detection Efficiency for the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment's Vertical Drift Far Detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LT4MF3JI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.12328}
}
abstract

The DUNE experiment will implement a photon detection system composed of X-ARAPUCA (XA) devices. These trap incoming VUV photons by internal reflection in a wavelength shifter light guide to be collected onto silicon photomultiplier arrays, sensitive to visible light. In the baseline design, dichroic filters are used to prevent photons from escaping. The configuration proposed for DUNE's Vertical Drift (VD) module has been characterised in liquid argon for the first time using dedicated cryogenic setups developed at CIEMAT and INFN Naples. Additionally, several alternative configurations, based on the design optimisation studies of an R&D campaign, have been evaluated. The results show an efficiency of up to 4.5$\pm$4~% at 4.5~V overvoltage, representing a significant improvement over previous XA implementations. Most notably, configurations without dichroic filters show an improvement of up to 18~%, attributed to transmittance losses in the dichroic filters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.12328 by the authors.

Figure 19
Figure 19. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. The alpha signal is obtained by triggering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references

  1. [20]

    Measurement of the photon detection efficiency of hamamatsu vuv4 sipms at cryogenic tem- perature,

    L. P´ erez-Molina, “Measurement of the photon detection efficiency of hamamatsu vuv4 sipms at cryogenic tem- perature,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 19, no. 03, p. C03027, 2024

    2024

  2. [22]

    Reflectivity and pde of vuv4 hamamatsu sipms in liquid xenon,

    P. Nakarmi, I. Ostrovskiy, A. Soma, F. Reti` ere, S. Al Kharusi, M. Alfaris, G. Anton, I. Arnquist, I. Badhrees, P. Barbeau,et al., “Reflectivity and pde of vuv4 hamamatsu sipms in liquid xenon,”Journal of In- strumentation, vol. 15, no. 01, p. P01019, 2020

    2020

  3. [1]

    Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume I Introduction to DUNE,

    DUNE Collaboration, “Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume I Introduction to DUNE,”JINST, vol. 15, no. 08, p. T08008, 2020

    2020

  4. [2]

    Deep underground neutrino ex- periment (dune), far detector technical design report, vol- ume ii: Dune physics,

    DUNE Collaboration, “Deep underground neutrino ex- periment (dune), far detector technical design report, vol- ume ii: Dune physics,”TBD, 02 2020

    2020

  5. [3]

    Supernova neutrino burst detec- tion with the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment,

    DUNE Collaboration, “Supernova neutrino burst detec- tion with the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment,” 2021

    2021

  6. [4]

    The x-arapuca: an improvement of the arapuca device,

    A. Machado, E. Segreto, D. Warner, A. Fauth, B. Gelli, R. M´ aximo, A. Pissolatti, L. Paulucci, and F. Marinho, “The x-arapuca: an improvement of the arapuca device,” Journal of instrumentation, vol. 13, no. 04, p. C04026, 2018

    2018

  7. [5]

    Characterization and novel application of power over fiber for electronics in a harsh environment,

    M. A. Arroyave, B. Behera, F. Cavanna, A. Feld, F. Guo, A. Heindel, C. K. Jung, K. Koch, D. L. Silverio, D. A. M. Caicedo, C. McGrew, A. Paudel, W. Pellico, R. Rivera, J. R. Rondon, S. Sacerdoti, P. Shanahan, W. Shi, D. T. Mu˜ noz, D. Totani, C. Uy, C. Vermeulen, and H. V. de Souza, “Characterization and novel application of power over fiber for electroni...

    2024

  8. [6]

    Absolute Scintillation Yields in Liq- uid Argon and Xenon for Various Particles,

    T. Doke, A. Hitachi, J. Kikuchi, K. Masuda, H. Okada and E. Shibamura, “Absolute Scintillation Yields in Liq- uid Argon and Xenon for Various Particles,” mar 2002

    2002

Show all 32 references
  1. [7]

    The scintilla- tion of liquid argon,

    T. Heindl, T. Dandl, M. Hofmann, R. Kr¨ ucken, L. Ober- auer, W. Potzel, J. Wieser and A. Ulrich, “The scintilla- tion of liquid argon,” oct 2010

    2010

  2. [9]

    The DUNE Far Detector Vertical Drift Technology. Technical Design Report,

    DUNE Collaboration, “The DUNE Far Detector Vertical Drift Technology. Technical Design Report,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 19, p. T08004, aug 2024

    2024

  3. [10]

    Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume IV: Far Detector Single-phase Technology,

    DUNE Collaboration, “Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Re- port, Volume IV: Far Detector Single-phase Technology,” 2020

    2020

  4. [11]

    Sys- tematic investigation of absorption, fluorescence and laser properties of some p-and m-oligophenylenes,

    N. Nijegorodov, W. Downey, and M. Danailov, “Sys- tematic investigation of absorption, fluorescence and laser properties of some p-and m-oligophenylenes,”Spec- trochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 783–795, 2000

    2000

  5. [12]

    Enhanced Specular Reflector (ESR)

    Vikuiti™. Enhanced Specular Reflector (ESR)

  6. [13]

    First results on ProtoDUNE-SP liquid argon time projection chamber performance from a beam test at the CERN Neutrino Platform,

    B. Abiet al., “First results on ProtoDUNE-SP liquid argon time projection chamber performance from a beam test at the CERN Neutrino Platform,”JINST, vol. 15, no. 12, p. P12004, 2020

    2020

  7. [14]

    (G2P) Wavelength Shifter bar

    Glass to power. (G2P) Wavelength Shifter bar

  8. [15]

    (FBK) SiPM technology

    Fondazione Bruno Kessler. (FBK) SiPM technology

  9. [16]

    Development of a design for sipms readout in cryogenic environment for large area pho- ton detectors,

    N. Gallice, A. Zani, P. Sala, M. Lazzaroni, M. Citterio, and A. Andreani, “Development of a design for sipms readout in cryogenic environment for large area pho- ton detectors,” in2021 IEEE International Instrumenta- tion and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), pp. 1–6,...

    2021

  10. [17]

    Fd-vd photon collectors: Design, optimization and characterization

    DUNE Collaboration, “Fd-vd photon collectors: Design, optimization and characterization.” Manuscript in prepa- ration, 2025

    2025

  11. [18]

    Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (HPK). Multi-Pixel Pho- ton Counters (MPPCs/SiPMs) - Photomultiplier Tube (R11065-20A)

  12. [19]

    Performance of hamamatsu vuv4 sipms for detecting liquid argon scintillation, 2022

    T. Pershing, J. Xu, E. Bernard, J. Kingston, E. Mizrachi, J. Brodsky, A. Razeto, P. Kachru, A. Bernstein, E. Pan- tic,et al., “Performance of hamamatsu vuv4 sipms for detecting liquid argon scintillation, 2022.”

    2022

  13. [21]

    Probability distri- bution and noise factor of solid state photomultiplier signals with cross-talk and afterpulsing,

    S. Vinogradov, T. Vinogradova, V. Shubin, D. Shushakov, and K. Sitarsky, “Probability distri- bution and noise factor of solid state photomultiplier signals with cross-talk and afterpulsing,” in2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), pp. 1496–1500, IEEE, 2009

    2009

  14. [23]

    Validation of electrodeposited 241am alpha-particle sources for use in liquified gas detectors at cryogenic temperatures,

    E. C. Alamillo, M. C. V´ azquez, P. R. Mendes, R.´A. Gar- rote, J. C. Anad´ on, C. Cuesta, A. De la Torre Rojo, I. Gil- Botella, I. M. Mart ´ ın, M. M. Mendieta,et al., “Validation of electrodeposited 241am alpha-particle sources for use in liquified gas detectors at cryogenic...

    2023

  15. [24]

    Tools for Discovery

    CAEN. Tools for Discovery

  16. [25]

    Improved peak shape fitting in alpha spectra,

    S. Pomm´ e and B. Caro Marroyo, “Improved peak shape fitting in alpha spectra,”Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 96, pp. 148–153, 2015

    2015

  17. [26]

    Effects of nitrogen and oxygen con- tamination in liquid argon,

    R. Acciarriet al., “Effects of nitrogen and oxygen con- tamination in liquid argon,”Nuclear Physics B - Pro- ceedings Supplements, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 70–73, 2009. 11th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radia- tion Detectors (IPRD08)

    2009

  18. [27]

    Effect of ionization density on the time dependence of luminescence from liquid ar- gon and xenon,

    A. Hitachi, T. Takahashi, N. Funayama, K. Masuda, J. Kikuchi, and T. Doke, “Effect of ionization density on the time dependence of luminescence from liquid ar- gon and xenon,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 27, pp. 5279–5285, May 1983

    1983

  19. [28]

    Evidence of delayed light emission of tetraphenyl-butadiene excited by liquid-argon scintilla- tion light,

    E. Segreto, “Evidence of delayed light emission of tetraphenyl-butadiene excited by liquid-argon scintilla- tion light,”Physical Review C, vol. 91, Mar. 2015

    2015

  20. [29]

    Dynamical behaviour of free electrons in the recombina- tion process in liquid argon, krypton, and xenon,

    S. Kubota, M. Hishida, M. Suzuki, and J.-z. Ruan(Gen), “Dynamical behaviour of free electrons in the recombina- tion process in liquid argon, krypton, and xenon,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 20, pp. 3486–3496, Oct 1979

    1979

  21. [30]

    Luminescence decay in con- densed argon under high energy excitation,

    M. Carvalho and G. Klein, “Luminescence decay in con- densed argon under high energy excitation,”Journal of Luminescence, vol. 18-19, pp. 487–490, 1979

    1979

  22. [31]

    Effects of nitrogen contamination in liquid argon,

    R. Acciarriet al., “Effects of nitrogen contamination in liquid argon,”Journal of Instrumentation, vol. 5, p. P06003–P06003, June 2010

    2010

  23. [32]

    Probability distri- bution and noise factor of solid state photomultiplier signals with cross-talk and afterpulsing,

    S. Vinogradov, T. Vinogradova, V. Shubin, D. Shushakov, and K. Sitarsky, “Probability distri- bution and noise factor of solid state photomultiplier signals with cross-talk and afterpulsing,” in2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC), pp. 1496–1500, 2009

    2009

  24. [33]

    Measurement of the absolute efficiency of the x-arapuca photon detec- tor for the dune far detector 1,

    R. ´Alvarez-Garrote, C. Brizzolari, A. Canto, E. Calvo, C. Cattadori, C. Cuesta, A. de la Torre Rojo, I. Gil- Botella, C. Gotti, D. Guffanti,et al., “Measurement of the absolute efficiency of the x-arapuca photon detec- tor for the dune far detector 1,”The European Physical Jo...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.