Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 94 references

Vorticity-Crystalline Order Coupling in Supersolids: Excitations and Re-entrant Phases

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tuning rotation frequency, not interactions, can drive a dipolar condensate between superfluid and supersolid phases, and back, repeatedly.

desk verdict Rotation-controlled re-entrant supersolidity is the genuinely new result here; the analytic mode-swapping inside the supersolid phase is the main soft spot, and one missing spectrum would settle it. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.05846 v2 pith:LTJW6735 submitted 2026-01-09 cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-ph

Malte Schubert , Koushik Mukherjee , Philipp Stürmer , Stephanie Reimann This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.atom-ph
keywords supersoliddipolarBose-EinsteincondensaterotationpersistentcurrentrotonGoldstonemodeBogoliubovspectrumre-entrantphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the rotation frequency of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate is a control parameter for supersolidity, independent of the interparticle interactions. At a fixed scattering length near the quantum-critical point, increasing rotation softens a roton mode, condensing the gas into a density-modulated supersolid. Then the entry of a single persistent current reverses the effective flow, lifts the gapless Goldstone mode back to a finite-energy roton, and restores the uniform superfluid. As rotation increases further, each step of winding-number nucleation resets the effective velocity, producing discrete pockets of supersolidity separated by superfluid intervals. If correct, this gives an experimentally accessible knob for switching crystalline order on and off in ultracold gases.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Galilean-shifted dispersion relation ω_M^(q)(Ω) = ω̃_M − M Ω_eff, which separates the interaction-driven mode frequencies from a Doppler shift set by the effective flow Ω_eff = Ω − ℏq/(M R²). It predicts the splitting of roton branches, sets the threshold for roton softening, and accounts for the mode swapping that de-softens the Goldstone mode when the winding number q changes. The paper uses this formula to construct the re-entrant phase diagram and to identify the conditions under which rotation-induced supersolidity should occur.

What would settle it

A measurement of the density contrast versus rotation frequency at fixed scattering length: the prediction is that the contrast rises at the roton-instability frequency, falls to zero at the first persistent-current threshold, and rises again at the next threshold. If the contrast stays finite across the persistent-current entry, or if the Goldstone mode remains gapless past the threshold, the de-softening mechanism is falsified. This could be checked by time-of-flight imaging or Bragg spectroscopy in a rotating dipolar gas.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a vortex-driven de-softening mechanism. In a rotating dipolar gas, the roton instability that creates a supersolid is governed by the effective flow velocity Ω_eff = Ω − Ω_GS, where Ω_GS is the angular velocity of the persistent-current ground state. When a persistent current enters, the sign of Ω_eff reverses, swapping the energies of the Goldstone and Higgs modes. The formerly gapless Goldstone mode becomes a gapped roton−, which suppresses the density modulation and restores the superfluid. This cycle repeats for higher winding numbers, yielding re-entrant supersolid phases. The paper demonstrates this with analytical dispersion relations and numerical Bogoliubov

Load-bearing premise

The mode-swapping argument assumes that the excitation spectrum of the density-modulated supersolid can still be described by the same angular-momentum quantum numbers as the uniform superfluid, an approximation that is only exact in a tightly confining ring and is not perfectly satisfied in the numerical geometries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rotation offers a new experimental handle to induce supersolidity without tuning interparticle interactions, within reach of existing dipolar-gas setups.
  • The superfluid-to-supersolid transition driven by rotation is predicted to be first-order, with a jump in the superfluid fraction, unlike the second-order transition usually seen in rings.
  • The re-entrant sequence means that a single sample, at fixed scattering length, can be toggled between superfluid and supersolid multiple times by increasing rotation.
  • The mechanism is argued to generalize to other platforms with low-energy angular excitations, provided the roton instability is the lowest critical velocity.
  • The transition's first-order character implies a Higgs-mode gap at the critical point, giving a spectral fingerprint that experiments can look for.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the de-softening mechanism holds, the re-entrant pockets should also appear when the rotation is ramped downward, with hysteresis expected for a first-order transition; the paper does not discuss this.
  • The same mode-swapping physics might be mimicked by synthetic gauge fields in non-dipolar gases, since only the effective flow velocity matters, not the mechanical rotation.
  • The paper's three conditions for rotation-induced supersolidity (low-energy angular excitations, concave spectrum, roton below phonon) suggest a search strategy: systems satisfying these could show the effect even with weak dipolar interactions.
  • At higher winding numbers, where the pockets get broader and closer together, one might expect a crossover to a multiply charged superfluid with re-entrant ordering; whether pockets merge or remain discrete is an unresolved extrapolation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This Letter studies rotating dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates in toroidal and oblate harmonic traps. Using the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with LHY corrections and the associated Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) spectra, the authors show that increasing the rotation frequency can soften a roton mode and drive a superfluid-to-supersolid transition even when the scattering length is held near (but below) the quantum critical point. They further propose that the entry of a quantized persistent current or vortex reverses the effective Doppler shift, converting the Goldstone mode back into a finite-energy roton and restoring the superfluid. This produces a sequence of re-entrant supersolid pockets as a function of rotation frequency. The main text presents excitation spectra, phase diagrams in the (Omega, a_s) plane, a Ginzburg-Landau argument for a first-order transition, and real-time simulations showing dynamical emergence of density modulation.

Significance. If the central scenario is correct, the paper introduces a qualitatively new control parameter for supersolidity: instead of tuning interactions, one can use rotation to generate and destroy crystalline order through the nucleation of topological charge. The proposed vortex/persistent-current-driven de-softening of the Goldstone mode is an original mechanism, and the re-entrant phase diagram is a crisp, falsifiable prediction. The numerical work is substantial: full 3D eGPE plus BdG calculations, a phase diagram in two parameters, and dynamical quenches with phenomenological damping. The analytic mode-splitting formula (Eq. (2)) is derived from the BdG equations in the uniform superfluid limit and provides a useful design principle. However, the manuscript applies this formula to the density-modulated supersolid phase, where the derivation does not strictly apply; this is the main weakness and is discussed in the major comments. The paper should also be credited for citing, but not yet incorporating, the relevant anomalous-Doppler literature, which indicates the authors are aware of the subtlety.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (12); Fig. 2(a)] The central re-entrant scenario rests on applying Eq. (2) to the density-modulated supersolid. In a uniform superfluid, m is a good quantum number and Eq. (2) follows from the BdG equations (Appendix B). In the supersolid, continuous rotational symmetry is spontaneously broken to C_{n_d}; BdG modes are Bloch states indexed by kappa = m mod n_d, and the Doppler shift is known to be anomalous, controlled by the superfluid fraction f_s < 1 (Ref. [90]). The manuscript cites Ref. [90] but does not use it. The 'mode-swapping' step—by which the q=1 persistent current turns the Higgs- mode into a roton+ and lifts the Goldstone mode—is asserted, not derived. The claimed full-BdG cross-check in Appendix B is not shown for the q=1 supersolid: no eigenfrequencies or eigenvectors of the modulated state near Omega_R^(1), decomposed by the angular momentum of delta n, are presented. This is load-bearin
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (12); Fig. 2(a)] Appendix B concedes that the tight-confinement condition is 'not perfectly satisfied', that the energies are not continuous at Omega_PC, and that the intrinsic frequency must be replaced by a q-dependent tilde_omega_M^(q). This means the quantitative predictions in the supersolid are not actually derived from the Galilean formula; they rely on an ad hoc patch. Moreover, it is unclear whether the branches in Fig. 2(a) are the full-BdG results or the patched analytic expression. The text states that 'all results presented in the main text are cross-verified by solving the full, non-decoupled BdG problem', but no such comparison is shown. Please state, for each curve in Fig. 2(a), which calculation is being plotted, and include the full-BdG spectra in the q=1 supersolid used to locate Omega_R^(1). Without this, a reader cannot verify the key de-softening mechanism.
  3. [Roton instability and re-entrant SS state; Ginzburg-Landau argument] The claim that TRS breaking makes the SF-SS transition first-order rests on the estimate L_z ~ I Omega (1 - f_s), which is introduced without derivation. In a density-modulated state, L_z, the moment of inertia, and the superfluid fraction have nontrivial spatial dependences, and the sign and magnitude of the resulting linear-in-f_s term are not demonstrated. A linear term alone does not guarantee a discontinuous jump unless its coefficient is sufficiently large relative to the quadratic terms. This point is secondary to the re-entrance mechanism, but it is presented as a central result ('fundamentally shifts the transition to first-order') and should be substantiated or softened.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses 'vortex-driven de-softening', but in the toroidal geometry the relevant topological objects are persistent currents, not vortices. Please adjust the wording to cover both cases.
  2. [Fig. 2(b)] The color scale in the phase diagram is not described and the contour defining the SF/SS boundary is not specified. Please add a caption description of C and a marker for the maximum at Omega_PC^(1).
  3. [Page 3, roton+ / roton- definitions] The labels roton+ and roton- are used before the sign convention with respect to M is explained. A brief definition tied to Eq. (2) would improve readability.
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (6)] It would help to state explicitly that the damping term gamma is used only in the real-time simulations and not in the ground-state imaginary-time propagation, and to comment on the dependence of the final density contrast on the chosen gamma values.
  5. [References] Reference [78] is formatted with full author names while others use surname initials; unify the style. Also check that Ref. [77] (supplementary video) is available to the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the re-entrant supersolid sequence is a direct eGPE/BdG numerical result, with Eq. (2) as a derived interpretive model.

full rationale

The central SF-to-SS-to-SF re-entrant sequence is obtained by numerically solving the eGPE for ground states and the BdG equations for excitations: the phase diagrams in Figs. 1(d), 2(b), and 3(b) are computed from the density contrast C, and Fig. 2(a) shows BdG frequencies. The analytical centerpiece, Eq. (2), is derived in Appendix B from the BdG equations under the stated tight-ring approximation for a uniform superfluid; it is an output of the derivation, not an assumed conclusion. No parameter is fitted to the target phase diagram: the critical frequencies Omega_R and Omega_PC are computed from trap parameters, atom number, and standard ring quantization. The paper's self-citations (Refs. [27,54,60,63,66,67]) are background or prior independent ring-supersolid studies; none is used as an external uniqueness theorem or as the source of the main mechanism. Appendix B explicitly flags the approximation: "this condition is not perfectly satisfied" and states that results are "cross-verified by solving the full, non-decoupled BdG problem"; this is an acknowledged limitation and an omitted displayed verification, but it affects quantitative robustness of the analytical model rather than making the derivation circular. No step reduces a prediction to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The only fitted numbers in the paper are damping coefficients used for real-time dynamics; the phase diagram is computed from physical control parameters (a_s, Ω, N, trap frequencies). The central approximations are the mean-field eGPE/LHY model and the analytic tight-confinement/Galilean-shift reduction; the latter is acknowledged to be imperfect and is cross-checked numerically.

free parameters (1)
  • phenomenological damping γ = 0.035 (toroidal), 0.02 (oblate harmonic)
    Used only in real-time dynamical simulations to relax to steady state; does not enter the equilibrium phase boundaries or excitation spectra.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation with LHY local-density term g_QF|Ψ|^3 accurately describes ground states and excitations of the dipolar gas at N≈2–3×10^4 atoms.
    Used throughout (Eqs. 3–5, Appendix A); beyond-mean-field corrections beyond LHY are neglected.
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov–de Gennes linearization around the mean-field ground state captures the relevant collective modes.
    Standard for weak excitations of a dilute BEC; invoked in Eq. (1).
  • ad hoc to paper Tight-confinement (R >> sqrt(ℏ/Mω_r)) and q-independent radial profile allow reduction to the Galilean-shifted dispersion Eq. (2).
    Appendix B states these conditions are not perfectly satisfied in the numerics and finds energy discontinuities at Ω_PC, patched by a q-dependent ω̃.
  • ad hoc to paper Excitations in the density-modulated supersolid can still be labeled by angular momentum m and follow the same Doppler-shifted dispersion.
    Used to describe Goldstone de-softening and mode swapping in the SS phase, despite broken continuous rotational symmetry; not rigorously justified.
  • ad hoc to paper The Ginzburg-Landau estimate L_z ≈ IΩ(1−f_s) and the linear-in-f_s energy term correctly describe the order of the transition.
    Used to argue the SF-SS transition is first-order; no microscopic derivation is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vorticity-Crystalline Order Coupling in Supersolids: Excitations and Re-entrant Phases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTJW6735

@misc{pith2026260105846,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vorticity-Crystalline Order Coupling in Supersolids: Excitations and Re-entrant Phases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTJW6735}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.05846}
}
read the original abstract

Rotation is a natural tool in ultracold gases to break time-reversal symmetry, yet its impact on the collective excitations of supersolids remains largely unexplored. We show theoretically that tuning the rotation frequency, rather than the interparticle interactions, can trigger the superfluid-to-supersolid transition in Bose-Einstein condensates (dBECs). Computing excitation spectra in the presence of vortices and persistent currents, we uncover a vortex-driven de-softening mechanism whereby quantized vorticity elevates the gapless Goldstone mode to a finite-energy roton, restoring superfluidity. This effect results in re-entrant supersolid phases as a function of rotation frequency, revealing a fundamental coupling between topological defects and crystalline order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.05846 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [90]

    Zawi´ slak, M

    T. Zawi´ slak, M. ˇSindik, S. Stringari, and A. Recati, Anomalous doppler effect in superfluid and supersolid atomic gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 226001 (2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    A. D. Sakharov, Violation of cp invariance, c asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32 (1967), [JETP Lett. 5, 24 (1967)]

    1967

  3. [2]

    J. H. Christenson, J. W. Cronin, V. L. Fitch, and R. Turlay, Evidence for the 2πdecay of thek 0 2 meson, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 138 (1964)

    1964

  4. [3]

    A. P. Mackenzie and Y. Maeno, The superconductivity of Sr 2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 657 (2003)

    2003

  5. [4]

    H. A. Kramers, La th´ eorie du pouvoir rotatoire param- agn´ etique, Proc. Acad. Sci. Amsterdam33, 959 (1930)

    1930

  6. [5]

    von Klitzing, G

    K. von Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-precision determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  7. [6]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized Hall conductivity in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981)

    1981

  8. [7]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

Show all 94 references
  1. [8]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  2. [9]

    H. W. Meul, C. Rossel, M. Decroux, O. Fischer, G. Re- menyi, and A. Briggs, Observation of magnetic-field- induced superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 497 (1984)

    1984

  3. [10]

    J. P. Eisenstein, K. B. Lewis, A. S. Yeh, K. W. West, and L. N. Pfeiffer, Insulating and fractional quantum Hall states in the first excited Landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076801 (2002)

    2002

  4. [11]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 647 (2009)

    2009

  5. [12]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli´ nas, and P.¨Ohberg, Col- loquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  6. [13]

    Chevy, K

    F. Chevy, K. W. Madison, and J. Dalibard, Measurement of the angular momentum of a rotating bose-einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2223 (2000); J. R. Abo- Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ketterle, Ob- servation of vortex lattices in Bose-Einstein Condensates, S...

    2000

  7. [14]

    M. W. Zwierlein, J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. H. Schunck, A. Schirotzek, and W. Ketterle, Vortices and superflu- idity in a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Nature435, 1047 (2005)

    2005

  8. [15]

    Ramanathan, K

    A. Ramanathan, K. C. Wright, S. R. Muniz, M. Zelan, W. T. Hill, C. J. Lobb, K. Helmerson, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Superflow in a toroidal bose-einstein condensate: An atomic squid, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 130401 (2011); S. Moulder, S. Beattie, R. P. Smith, N. Tammuz, ...

    2011

  9. [16]

    Del Pace, K

    G. Del Pace, K. Xhani, A. Muzi Falconi, M. Fedrizzi, N. Grani, D. Hernandez Rajkov, M. Inguscio, F. Scazza, W. J. Kwon, and G. Roati, Imprinting persistent cur- rents in tunable fermionic rings, Phys. Rev. X12, 041037 6 (2022); Y. Cai, D. G. Allman, P. Sabharwal, and K. C. Wri...

    2022

  10. [17]

    Mukherjee, A

    B. Mukherjee, A. Shaffer, P. B. Patel, Z. Yan, C. C. Wil- son, V. Cr´ epel, R. J. Fletcher, and M. Zwierlein, Crys- tallization of bosonic quantum Hall states in a rotating quantum gas, Nature601, 58 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    R. Yao, S. Chi, B. Mukherjee, A. Shaffer, M. Zwierlein, and R. J. Fletcher, Observation of chiral edge transport in a rapidly rotating quantum gas, Nat. Phys.20, 1726 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    Klaus, T

    L. Klaus, T. Bland, E. Poli, C. Politi, G. Lamporesi, E. Casotti, R. N. Bisset, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Observation of vortices and vortex stripes in a dipolar condensate, Nature Physics18, 1453 (2022)

    2022

  13. [20]

    Casotti, E

    E. Casotti, E. Poli, L. Klaus, A. Litvinov, C. Ulm, C. Politi, M. J. Mark, T. Bland, and F. Ferlaino, Ob- servation of vortices in a dipolar supersolid, Nature635, 327 (2024)

    2024

  14. [21]

    E. P. Gross, Unified theory of interacting bosons, Phys. Rev.106, 161 (1957)

    1957

  15. [22]

    C. N. Yang, Concept of off-diagonal long-range order and the quantum phases of liquid he and of superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.34, 694 (1962)

    1962

  16. [23]

    A. F. Andreev and I. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Theory of Defects In Cystals, J. Exp. Theo. Phys.56, 2057 (1969)

  17. [24]

    G. V. Chester, Speculations on Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion and Quantum Crystals, Phys. Rev. A2, 256 (1970)

    1970

  18. [25]

    Boninsegni and N

    M. Boninsegni and N. V. Prokof’ev, Colloquium: Super- solids: What and where are they?, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 759 (2012)

    2012

  19. [26]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 026401 (2023)

    2023

  20. [27]

    Mukherjee, T

    K. Mukherjee, T. A. Cardinale, L. Chergui, P. St¨ urmer, and S. Reimann, Droplets and supersolids in ultra-cold atomic quantum gases, The European Physical Journal Special Topics232, 3417 (2023)

    2023

  21. [28]

    Recati and S

    A. Recati and S. Stringari, Supersolidity in ultracold dipolar gases, Nature Reviews Physics5, 735 (2023)

    2023

  22. [29]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Long-lived and transient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Phys. Rev. X9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    B¨ ottcher, J.-N

    F. B¨ ottcher, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. X9, 011051 (2019)

    2019

  24. [31]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Observation of a Dipolar Quantum Gas with Metastable Supersolid Properties, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 130405 (2019)

    2019

  25. [32]

    M. A. Norcia, C. Politi, L. Klaus, E. Poli, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Two-dimensional supersolidity in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature596, 357 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    Leonard, A

    J. Leonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, A stripe phase with supersolid properties in spin-orbit-coupled bose-einstein condensates, Nature 543, 87 (2017)

    2017

  27. [34]

    J.-R. Li, J. Lee, W. Huang, S. Burchesky, B. Shteynas, F. C. Top, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, A stripe phase with supersolid properties in spin-orbit-coupled bose-einstein condensates, Nature543, 91–94 (2017)

    2017

  28. [35]

    Pomeau and S

    Y. Pomeau and S. Rica, Dynamics of a model of super- solid, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2426 (1994)

    1994

  29. [36]

    Santos, G

    L. Santos, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Lewenstein, Roton- Maxon Spectrum and Stability of Trapped Dipolar Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 250403 (2003)

    2003

  30. [37]

    R. M. Wilson, S. Ronen, J. L. Bohn, and H. Pu, Man- ifestations of the roton mode in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 245302 (2008)

    2008

  31. [38]

    P. B. Blakie, D. Baillie, and R. N. Bisset, Roton spec- troscopy in a harmonically trapped dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A86, 021604 (2012)

    2012

  32. [39]

    A. D. Martin and P. B. Blakie, Stability and structure of an anisotropically trapped dipolar bose-einstein conden- sate: Angular and linear rotons, Phys. Rev. A86, 053623 (2012)

    2012

  33. [40]

    Chomaz, R

    L. Chomaz, R. M. W. van Bijnen, D. Petter, G. Faraoni, S. Baier, J. H. Becher, M. J. Mark, F. W¨ achtler, L. San- tos, and F. Ferlaino, Observation of roton mode popula- tion in a dipolar quantum gas, Nat. Phys.14, 442 (2018)

    2018

  34. [41]

    Schmidt, J

    J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, M. Schmidt, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, T. Lan- gen, M. Zwierlein, and T. Pfau, Roton excitations in an oblate dipolar quantum gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 193002 (2021)

    2021

  35. [42]

    Landau, Theory of the superfluidity of helium ii, Phys

    L. Landau, Theory of the superfluidity of helium ii, Phys. Rev.60, 356 (1941); L. P. Pitaevskii, Layered structure of Bose crystals, JETP Lett.39, 511 (1984), [Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 39, 423 (1984)]; F. Ancilotto, F. Dal- fovo, L. P. Pitaevskii, and F. Toigo, Density patt...

    1941

  36. [43]

    Ferrier-Barbut, H

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, and T. Pfau, Observation of Quantum Droplets in a Strongly Dipolar Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 215301 (2016)

    2016

  37. [44]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. B¨ ottcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Self-bound droplets of a dilute magnetic quantum liquid, Nature539, 259 (2016)

    2016

  38. [45]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. W¨ achtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-Fluctuation-Driven Crossover from a Dilute Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Macrodroplet in a Dipolar Quantum Fluid, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016)

    2016

  39. [46]

    Natale, R

    G. Natale, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, D. Pet- ter, M. J. Mark, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino, Excitation spectrum of a trapped dipolar supersolid and its experi- mental evidence, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 050402 (2019)

    2019

  40. [47]

    Petter, G

    D. Petter, G. Natale, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patschei- der, M. J. Mark, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino, Probing the Roton Excitation Spectrum of a Stable Dipolar Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 183401 (2019)

    2019

  41. [48]

    M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy Goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature574, 386 (2019)

    2019

  42. [49]

    Hertkorn, F

    J. Hertkorn, F. B¨ ottcher, M. Guo, J. N. Schmidt, T. Lan- gen, H. P. B¨ uchler, and T. Pfau, Fate of the amplitude mode in a trapped dipolar supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 193002 (2019)

    2019

  43. [50]

    Hertkorn, J.-N

    J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, P. Uerlings, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lan- 7 gen, M. Zwierlein, and T. Pfau, Supersolidity in two- dimensional trapped dipolar droplet arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 155301 (2021)

    2021

  44. [51]

    Ilg and H

    T. Ilg and H. P. B¨ uchler, Ground-state stability and exci- tation spectrum of a one-dimensional dipolar supersolid, Phys. Rev. A107, 013314 (2023)

    2023

  45. [52]

    Kirkby, A.-C

    W. Kirkby, A.-C. Lee, D. Baillie, T. Bland, F. Ferlaino, P. B. Blakie, and R. N. Bisset, Excitations of a binary dipolar supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 103401 (2024)

    2024

  46. [53]

    E. Poli, D. Baillie, F. Ferlaino, and P. B. Blakie, Excita- tions of a two-dimensional supersolid, Phys. Rev. A110, 053301 (2024)

    2024

  47. [54]

    Hertkorn, P

    J. Hertkorn, P. St¨ urmer, K. Mukherjee, K. S. Ng, P. Uer- lings, F. Hellstern, L. Lavoine, S. Reimann, T. Pfau, and R. Klemt, Decoupled sound and amplitude modes in trapped dipolar supersolids, Physical Review Research6, L042056 (2024)

    2024

  48. [55]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  49. [56]

    Y. Tang, A. Sykes, N. Q. Burdick, J. L. Bohn, and B. L. Lev,s-wave scattering lengths of the strongly dipolar bosons 162Dy and 164Dy, Phys. Rev. A92, 022703 (2015)

    2015

  50. [57]

    A. R. P. Lima and A. Pelster, Quantum fluctuations in dipolar Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A84, 041604 (2011)

    2011

  51. [58]

    A. R. P. Lima and A. Pelster, Beyond mean-field low- lying excitations of dipolar Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A86, 063609 (2012)

    2012

  52. [59]

    W¨ achtler and L

    F. W¨ achtler and L. Santos, Ground-state properties and elementary excitations of quantum droplets in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A94, 043618 (2016)

    2016

  53. [60]

    Mukherjee, T

    K. Mukherjee, T. A. Cardinale, and S. M. Reimann, Selective rotation and attractive persistent currents in antidipolar ring supersolids, Phys. Rev. A111, 033304 (2025)

    2025

  54. [61]

    M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and D. M. Jezek, Dipolar condensates confined in a toroidal trap: Ground state and vortices, Phys. Rev. A81, 043619 (2010)

    2010

  55. [62]

    M. Abad, M. Guilleumas, R. Mayol, M. Pi, and D. M. Jezek, Phase slippage and self-trapping in a self-induced bosonic Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. A84, 035601 (2011)

    2011

  56. [63]

    M. N. Tengstrand, D. Boholm, R. Sachdeva, J. Bengts- son, and S. M. Reimann, Persistent currents in toroidal dipolar supersolids, Phys. Rev. A103, 013313 (2021)

    2021

  57. [64]

    M. N. Tengstrand, and P. St¨ urmer, and J. Ribbing, and S. M. Reimann, Toroidal dipolar supersolid with a rotat- ing weak link, Phys. Rev. A107, 063316 (2023)

    2023

  58. [65]

    ˇSindik, T

    M. ˇSindik, T. Zawi´ slak, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Sound, superfluidity, and layer compressibility in a ring dipolar supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146001 (2024)

    2024

  59. [66]

    Mukherjee, M

    K. Mukherjee, M. Schubert, R. Klemt, T. Bland, T. Pfau, and S. M. Reimann, Quantum carpets of Higgs quasi- particles in a supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 223402 (2025)

    2025

  60. [67]

    Schubert, K

    M. Schubert, K. Mukherjee, T. Pfau, and S. M. Reimann, Josephson vortices and persistent current in a double-ring supersolid system, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033110 (2025)

    2025

  61. [68]

    Preti, N

    N. Preti, N. Antolini, C. Drevon, P. Lombardi, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, G. Ferioli, G. Modugno, and G. Biagioni, Single-fluid model for rotating an- nular supersolids and its experimental implications, arXiv:2510.26753 (2025)

    2025

  62. [69]

    Zhang, F

    Y.-C. Zhang, F. Maucher, and T. Pohl, Supersolidity around a critical point in dipolar Bose Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 15301 (2019)

    2019

  63. [70]

    Biagioni, N

    G. Biagioni, N. Antolini, A. Ala˜ na, M. Modugno, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, L. Tanzi, and G. Modugno, Dimensional crossover in the superfluid-supersolid quan- tum phase transition, Phys. Rev. X12, 021019 (2022)

    2022

  64. [71]

    Kleinert, S

    H. Kleinert, S. Schmidt, and A. Pelster, Reentrant phe- nomenon in the quantum phase transitions of a gas of bosons trapped in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 160402 (2004)

    2004

  65. [72]

    Z. Shen, L. Radzihovsky, and V. Gurarie, Reentrant bcs- bec crossover and a superfluid-insulator transition in op- tical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 245302 (2012)

    2012

  66. [73]

    Radzihovsky, Reentrant supersolidity, arXiv:2311.04266 (2023)

    L. Radzihovsky, Reentrant supersolidity, arXiv:2311.04266 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  67. [74]

    A. M. Piekarska and T. K. Kope´ c, Reentrant phase tran- sitions involving glassy and superfluid orders in the ran- dom hopping bose–hubbard model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications609, 128360 (2023)

    2023

  68. [75]

    Krzywicka and T

    A. Krzywicka and T. P. Polak, Reentrant phase behavior in systems with density-induced tunneling, Sci. Rep.14, 10364 (2024)

    2024

  69. [76]

    Ding, L.-J

    S.-H. Ding, L.-J. Lang, Q. Zhu, and L. He, Interaction- induced reentrance of bose glass and quench dynamics of bose gases in twisted bilayer and quasicrystal optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A112, 033322 (2025)

    2025

  70. [77]

    See supplementary material for a video of the full dy- namics, which show the density isosurfaces in the rotat- ing frame for the oblate harmonic trap taken at 20% and 40% of the maximum density

  71. [78]

    and Hertkorn, J

    Schmidt, J.-N. and Hertkorn, J. and Guo, M. and B¨ ottcher, F. and Schmidt, M. and Ng, K. S. H. and Gra- ham, S. D. and Langen, T. and Zwierlein, M. and Pfau, T., Roton Excitations in an Oblate Dipolar Quantum Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 193002 (2021)

    2021

  72. [79]

    Molignini, Beyond-mean-field phases of rotating dipo- lar condensates in the strongly correlated regime, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 445401 (2025)

    P. Molignini, Beyond-mean-field phases of rotating dipo- lar condensates in the strongly correlated regime, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 445401 (2025)

    2025

  73. [80]

    S. M. Roccuzzo, A. Gallem ´ ı, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Rotating a Supersolid Dipolar Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 045702 (2020)

    2020

  74. [81]

    ˇSindik, A

    M. ˇSindik, A. Recati, S. M. Roccuzzo, L. Santos, and S. Stringari, Creation and robustness of quantized vor- tices in a dipolar supersolid when crossing the superfluid- to-supersolid transition, Phys. Rev. A106, L061303 (2022)

    2022

  75. [82]

    P. E. Cladis, New liquid-crystal phase diagram: An isotropic-nematic-smectic-a-nematic transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 48 (1975)

    1975

  76. [83]

    Gabay and G

    M. Gabay and G. Toulouse, Coexistence of spin-glass and ferromagnetic orderings, Phys. Rev. Lett.47, 201 (1981); G. Aeppli, S. M. Shapiro, R. J. Birgeneau, and H. S. Chen, Spin-wave dynamics in a reentrant spin-glass, Phys. Rev. B25, 4882 (1982)

    1981

  77. [84]

    K. B. Cooper, M. P. Lilly, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Insulating phases of two-dimensional electrons in high landau levels: Observation of sharp thresholds to conduction, Phys. Rev. B60, R11285 (1999)

    1999

  78. [85]

    Jaccarino and M

    V. Jaccarino and M. Peter, Ultra-high-field superconduc- tivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 290 (1962)

    1962

  79. [86]

    Zhang, W

    S. Zhang, W. Yuan, N. Bigagli, H. Kwak, T. Karman, 8 I. Stevenson, and S. Will, Observation of self-bound droplets of ultracold dipolar molecules, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15208 (2025); W. Zhang, H. Liu, F. Deng, K. Chen, S. Yi, and T. Shi, Supersolid phases in ultra- cold ga...

    2025

  80. [87]

    Manni, K

    F. Manni, K. G. Lagoudakis, T. C. H. Liew, R. Andr´ e, and B. Deveaud-Pl´ edran, Spontaneous pattern formation in a polariton condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 106401 (2011); D. Trypogeorgos, A. Gianfrate, M. Landini, D. Nigro, D. Gerace, I. Carusotto, F. Riminucci, K. W. Baldw...

    2011

  81. [88]

    Miyazawa, R

    Y. Miyazawa, R. Inoue, H. Matsui, G. Nomura, and M. Kozuma, Bose-einstein condensation of europium, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 223401 (2022)

    2022

  82. [89]

    S´ anchez-Baena, C

    J. S´ anchez-Baena, C. Politi, F. Maucher, F. Ferlaino, and T. Pohl, Heating a dipolar quantum fluid into a solid, Nature Communications14, 1868 (2023)

    2023

  83. [91]

    Biagioni, N

    G. Biagioni, N. Antolini, B. Donelli, L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. Fattori, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, M. Inguscio, L. Tanzi,et al., Measurement of the superfluid fraction of a supersolid by josephson effect, Nature629, 773 (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    Platt, D

    L. Platt, D. Baillie, and P. Blakie, Sound waves and fluc- tuations in one-dimensional supersolids, Physical Review A110, 023320 (2024)

    2024

  85. [93]

    Senarath Yapa and T

    P. Senarath Yapa and T. Bland, Anomalous dispersion of shear waves in dipolar supersolids, Phys. Rev. A112, L021303 (2025)

    2025

  86. [94]

    R. N. Bisset, R. M. Wilson, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Ground-state phase diagram of a dipolar condensate with quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A94, 033619 (2016). END MA TTER Appendix A— In this section, we describe the numerical methods employed to obtain the ground state...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.