Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 115 references

Implications of Broad [O III] 4364 and UV Line Emission in Two Little Red Dots at z ~ 7 - 8

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports the first detection of broad [O III] λ4364 emission in Little Red Dots, using its ratio to broad [O III] λ5008 to infer broad-line gas densities about 10 times higher than in low-redshift quasars.

desk verdict First broad [O III] 4364 detections in LRDs are a real step forward, but the density claim needs a temperature systematic and the second object is marginal. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04101 v1 pith:LTLGHXDJ submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.GA

Casey Papovich (1) , Kaila Ronayne (1) , Weida Hu (1) , Dale D. Kocevski (2) , Pablo Arrabal Haro (3) , Taylor A. Hutchison (3) , Steven L. Finkelstein (4) , Erini Lambrides (3
show 24 more authors
5) Rebecca L. Larson (6) Bren E. Backhaus Micaela B. Bagley (3 4) Nikko J. Cleri (7) Mark Dickinson (8) Ray Garner III (1) Jeyhan Kartaltepe (9) Vasily Kokorev (4) Grace M. Olivier (10) Anthony J. Taylor (4) Jonathan R. Trump (11) Jiayang Yang (1) ((1) Texas A&M University (2) Colby College (3) NASA GSFC (4) University of Texas at Austin (5) University of Maryland (6) STScI (7) Penn State University (8) NSF NOIRLab (9) Rochester Institute of Technology (10) Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science (11) University of Connecticut)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords LittleRedDotsbroad[OIII]4364broad-lineregiongasdensityJWSTNIRSpecspectroscopyz~7-8galaxiesactivegalacticnucleiCelectronnitrogenenhancement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two Little Red Dots at redshifts 6.68 and 8.35 show broad emission in the auroral [O III] $\lambda4364$ line, the first time such broad lines have been seen in this class. The ratio of that line to the broad [O III] $\lambda5008$ line implies gas densities $\log(n/\mathrm{cm}^{-3}) = 6.3$--$7.9$ in their broad-line regions, assuming temperatures of 15,000--25,000 K---about 3--10 times denser than the broad-line regions of low-redshift PG quasars. If those line widths trace orbital motion, the dense, metal-enhanced clouds sit within roughly 1--10 pc of the central engine. The same spectra show that ultraviolet narrow-line emission requires an extra ionizing source beyond stars, so some accretion-disk radiation must escape through a non-unity covering factor. This supports a picture of LRDs as stratified, clumpy gas envelopes rather than smooth, fully obscuring cocoons.

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is the broad-component ratio [O III] $\lambda4364/\lambda5008$. The two lines come from the same O$^{2+}$ ion but have different critical densities, $n_{\rm crit}\approx3\times10^7$ cm$^{-3}$ for $\lambda4364$ versus $\approx7\times10^5$ cm$^{-3}$ for $\lambda5008$, so the ratio becomes density-sensitive between those values. Separating the broad and narrow components with simultaneous double-Gaussian fits to H$\beta$, H$\gamma$, and the [O III] lines lets the authors isolate the broad-line-region gas, and the inferred densities carry the assumed temperature $T_e = 15{,}000$--$25{,}000$ K. A secondary piece of machinery is the C III] $\lambda1907/\lambda1909$ doublet ratio for the narrow-line densities, and the virial-scaled size estimate $R \lesssim R_e\,(\mathrm{FWHM}_n/\mathrm{FWHM})^2$ that places the broad [O III] clouds at about 1--10 pc from the center.

What would settle it

A high-resolution NIRSpec observation (e.g., G395H) of the two LRDs that recovers broad [O III] $\lambda4364$ at S/N $>5$ would test the claim: if the broad component disappears, if a temperature-sensitive ratio places $T_e$ outside 15,000--25,000 K, or if the measured $\lambda4364/\lambda5008$ ratio falls to the low-density limit, the density excess over quasars would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Both C3PO 45290 ($z=8.35$) and C3PO 46403 ($z=6.68$) show broad [O III] $\lambda4364$ with FWHM around 1000 km s$^{-1}$, roughly one-third the width of their broad H$\beta$ lines, while the [O III] $\lambda\lambda4960,5008$ lines remain narrow. Fitting two Gaussian components to H$\gamma$, H$\beta$, and [O III] $\lambda4364$ yields broad-component ratios $\lambda4364/\lambda5008$ that require $\log(n/\mathrm{cm}^{-3}) = 6.3$--$7.9$ at $T_e = 15{,}000$--$25{,}000$ K, exceeding the broad-line-region densities measured from the same ratio in PG quasars by a factor of 3--10. The paper further reports narrow UV lines ([C III] $\lambda1907 +$ C III] $\lambda1909$, O III] $\lambda\lambda1661,1666$) with C III]-derived densities $\log(n_e/\mathrm{cm}^{-3})=4.2$--$5.2$, and both objects require an additional ionizing source to explain the high equivalent widths and the [O III] $\lambda4364$/H$\gamma$ ratios. The interpretation is that dense clouds with non-unity covering factor surround the central accretion disk, letting part of its ionizing radiation escape, and the nitrogen and carbon abundance ratios point to recent, rapid star formation in the same gas.

Load-bearing premise

The broad-line density estimates assume the broad [O III]-emitting gas has $T_e = 15{,}000$--$25{,}000$ K, which the paper does not measure directly; the density shifts by several tenths of a dex outside that range, and for one object the broad line is detected at only $2.8\sigma$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Broad [O III] λ4364 emission appears in both LRDs, making these the first reported cases of broad forbidden lines in the class, with FWHM about one-third of Hβ.
  • The implied broad-line densities, log n = 6.3--7.9, sit 3--10 times above PG quasar broad-line regions, so LRDs are not straightforward scaled versions of standard quasar BLRs.
  • If the widths are virial, dense metal-enhanced clouds sit within about 1--10 pc of the engine, while the narrower [Fe II] in C3PO 46403 suggests cooler dense gas at larger radius.
  • The UV line equivalent widths and [O III] 4364/Hγ ratios require some accretion-disk photons to escape, disfavoring unity-covering-factor dense-gas models for these two objects.
  • Sub-solar C/O and elevated N/O imply rapid recent enrichment, linking the LRD phase to young starbursts if such ratios are found to be common.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the broad [O III] density diagnostic is applied to larger LRD samples, a testable prediction is that broad 4364 strength tracks the presence of [Fe II] or coronal lines, since all trace dense metal-enriched clouds; existing medium-resolution spectra could be searched for this correlation.
  • The assumed temperature window could be checked indirectly by comparing broad Hγ/Hβ and He II 4686/Hβ ratios with photoionization models; a hotter or cooler broad-line region would shift the density estimate by several tenths of a dex and weaken the quasar comparison.
  • The stratified, non-unity covering-factor picture may explain the weak X-rays: if sightlines clear enough to leak ionizing photons are also Compton-thin, the escaping field could be soft-photon-dominated, boosting [O III] and C III] without producing a hard X-ray component.
  • The nitrogen-enhancement signature could be tied to very young Wolf-Rayet populations by searching for broad He II 4686 or unusually high He II equivalent widths in a larger LRD sample, which would test the claim that short starbursts accompany the LRD phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports deep NIRSpec G140M/G395M spectroscopy of two Little Red Dots at z=6.68 and z=8.35. It identifies narrow and broad components in the rest-optical Balmer and [O III] lines and reports broad [O III] λ4364 emission (FWHM ~1000 km/s) in both objects. Using the broad [O III] λ4364/λ5008 ratio and an assumed broad-line temperature T_e=15,000–25,000 K, the authors derive broad-line gas densities log n_e ~ 6.3–7.9 cm^-3, 3–10 times higher than in PG quasar broad-line regions, and combine this with narrow-line C III], O III], and [O III]/Hγ diagnostics to argue that the LRD envelopes are stratified, with dense clouds at ~1–10 pc from the central engine and a non-unity covering factor. The paper also reports narrow-line densities from C III] and Si III]/N IV] doublets, sub-solar C/O, and enhanced N/O, and concludes that ionizing radiation from the accretion disk plus stellar photoionization is needed.

Significance. If the broad [O III] detection and density interpretation hold, this is the first report of broad forbidden [O III] lines in LRDs and provides a novel density measurement of the broad-line region at z>6, with implications for LRD structure and the escape of AGN ionizing radiation. The analysis is generally careful: two-component fits are shown with residuals, and the interpretation uses PyNeb, public photoionization grids, and comparison samples. The narrow-line density measurements and EW-based ionization arguments are useful even if the broad-line density claim is later revised. However, the main density claim currently rests on an assumed T_e and on one marginal line detection, so the headline quantitative result is not yet established at the level of the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Table 3, Figure 8] The central density claim is not robust to the assumed broad-line electron temperature. The paper derives log n_e = 6.8±0.5 and 7.4±0.5 from the broad [O III] λ4364/λ5008 ratio using T_e = 15,000–25,000 K, but it states explicitly 'we have no direct measure of the gas temperature of the broad lines.' The ratio depends on T_e as well as n_e, and the low-density limiting ratio increases strongly with T_e; at T_e ≈ 40,000 K, a plausible temperature for a dense, hard-irradiated BLR, the same observed ratios would give densities about 0.5–1 dex lower. That shift would place C3PO 46403 inside the PG quasar distribution and C3PO 45290 near its upper tail, removing the quoted '3–10× higher than quasars' result. Table 3 propagates only the line-ratio uncertainties and not this T_e systematic. Please provide the inferred density as an explicit function of T_e (extending Figure 8 to at least 40,000 K), or obtain an independent T_e constraint, and revise the abstract, Section 4.2, and Section 6 so that the density excess is stated conditionally on T_e.
  2. [Table 1; Figures 5–6] The C3PO 46403 broad [O III] λ4364 detection is marginal: Table 1 gives F_b = (0.511±0.185)×10^-18 erg s^-1 cm^-2, i.e., S/N = 2.8, and the corresponding broad [O III] λ5008 detection has S/N ≈ 3.2. The line also sits in a region blended with broad Hγ and [Fe II] lines. This is below the usual 3σ detection threshold, yet the abstract and Section 6 state as a result that 'both LRDs show broad [O III] λ4364 emission.' If this line is not real or is substantially affected by the Hγ/[Fe II] decomposition, the two-object density claim reduces to a single object. Please report a detection significance based on a robust model comparison (for example, Δχ² or a Bayesian evidence ratio with and without the broad [O III] component), or present the conclusions with the marginal status of this source explicitly stated.
  3. [§5.3, Figure 14; §4.2] The comparison with PG quasars may not be apples-to-apples. The paper compares the C3PO broad-line densities with the Baskin & Laor (2005) PG quasar values but does not state whether those comparison values were derived with the same assumed T_e, the same atomic data (PyNeb versus other calculations), and the same treatment of narrow and broad components. If the PG densities were obtained at a different T_e or with different collisional data, part of the quoted 3–10× excess could be a systematic offset rather than a physical difference. Please state the assumed T_e and method for the comparison sample and, if necessary, recompute the comparison on a common T_e and atomic-data grid.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2] There is a typo: the text refers to 'C3PO 45490' where it should be 'C3PO 45290.'
  2. [Section 4.1] There is a typo: 'C3PO 43640' should be 'C3PO 46403' in the discussion of the UV line-ratio measurements.
  3. [Figure 11] The y-axis label reads 'log [O III] 4634 / H' but should refer to [O III] λ4364; the axis label is missing the λ and uses the wrong wavelength.
  4. [Section 3 and Section 1] There are typographical errors: 'compnonets' should be 'components' in Section 3, and Section 1 contains 'broad emission-line components of of hydrogen' with a duplicated 'of.'
  5. [Section 4.2] The text first says the broad lines are expected to have T_e ≈ 10,000–20,000 K (citing Baskin & Laor 2005) and then assumes T_e = 15,000–25,000 K; the upward shift and the widening of the range should be justified or reconciled.
  6. [Table 3 and Section 5.1] For C3PO 45290, the quoted N/O uncertainty excludes the ICF uncertainty even though the text states the ICF contributes an additional +0.23/−0.18 dex; the table should give a combined uncertainty or clearly state the separate contribution.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the broad-line density claim is derived from measured [O III] line ratios through external PyNeb atomic data, with the T_e assumption explicitly labeled as assumed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—broad [O III] λ4364 emission in two LRDs implying log n_e ≈ 6.3–7.9 cm^-3—rests on measured broad-component fluxes (Table 1), converted to density via the PyNeb emissivity ratio [O III] λ4364/λ5008 as a function of n_e and T_e (Section 4.2, Figure 8). PyNeb (Luridiana et al. 2015) is external atomic physics, and the comparison benchmark (PG quasar BLR densities from Baskin & Laor 2005) is an independent literature sample; no parameter is fitted to these two objects and then renamed a prediction. The electron temperature is not measured, and the paper says so explicitly ('we have no direct measure of the gas temperature of the broad lines'), listing T_e = 15,000–25,000 K as an assumption in Table 3. A different T_e would shift the densities, but this is model/assumption sensitivity, not circularity, because the density is not defined in terms of the conclusion. The [O III] λ4364/Hγ AGN classification uses empirical boundary regions from Mazzolari et al. (2024) and Backhaus et al. (2025), not boundaries fit to the C3PO data. Abundance ratios use PyNeb and literature Cloudy/BPASS grids with stated parameters (Sections 5.1–5.2). Several in-prep works by the same team (Papovich et al., Hu et al., Yang et al.) are cited for data reduction and model grids, but these are not the load-bearing evidence for the high-density claim. The S/N = 2.8 broad 4364 detection in C3PO 46403 and the assumed T_e are genuine fragility/correctness concerns, but they do not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs. Overall: no significant circularity; score 2 reflects minor, non-load-bearing self-citations only.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central density and abundance results rest on standard nebular physics (PyNeb), on assumed electron temperatures for the broad and narrow line gas, on literature ionization correction factors, and on the modeling choice of comparing measured line ratios to Cloudy/BPASS grids. No new ad hoc entities or fitted parameters are introduced; the assumed temperatures and borrowed ICFs are the main unverified inputs.

free parameters (2)
  • Assumed broad-line electron temperature T_e = 15000-25000 K
    Used to convert the broad [O III] 4364/5008 ratio into gas densities (Section 4.2, Table 3); no direct temperature measurement for the broad-line gas exists, and the density result is degenerate with this assumed value.
  • Assumed narrow-line electron temperature for abundance and density derivations = 15000 K (C3PO 45290), 20000 K (C3PO 46403)
    Assumed for C III] density and C/O, N/O abundance derivations (Section 5.1); results shift by approximately 0.1 dex over the 10,000-25,000 K range considered.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard atomic data and PyNeb collisional and radiative rates for line-ratio to density and abundance conversions
    Invoked in Section 4 for the C III], Si III], N IV], and [O III] ratio calculations.
  • domain assumption Photoionization models (Cloudy, BPASS) are reliable for predicting EW limits and line-ratio grids used to classify ionizing sources
    Used in Section 5.2.1 (Figure 10) to argue that the UV EWs exceed stellar-population limits and that the line ratios fall in the 'composite' region.
  • domain assumption No significant dust attenuation in the line-emitting regions, based on Hgamma/Hbeta ratios consistent with the theoretical value
    Stated in Section 3, with the caveat that beta_UV suggests A(V) ~ 0.7 if scattered light is absent; the paper argues the Balmer decrements are the better indicator.
  • domain assumption The narrow-line gas size is comparable to the F150W effective radius R_e used in the virial size estimate
    Equation 1 in Section 5.3.1 uses FWHM_n to set the spatial scale for R, assuming the narrow-line region fills the galaxy effective radius.
  • domain assumption Ionization correction factors from Berg et al. (2019) and Martinez et al. (2025) apply to the C2+/O2+, N2+/O2+, and N3+/O2+ ratios in these LRDs
    Applied in Section 5.1 to convert ionic ratios into C/O and N/O abundances; the N/O result for C3PO 45290 explicitly omits the ICF uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Implications of Broad [O III] 4364 and UV Line Emission in Two Little Red Dots at z ~ 7 - 8." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTLGHXDJ

@misc{pith2026260804101,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Implications of Broad [O III] 4364 and UV Line Emission in Two Little Red Dots at z ~ 7 - 8},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTLGHXDJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04101}
}
abstract

We present deep, NIRSpec G140M and G395M spectroscopy of Little Red Dots (LRDs) at z = 6.68 and z = 8.35. Both LRDs show broad Balmer and [O III] $\lambda$4364 emission. The broad [O III] $\lambda$4364 lines have FWHM ~1000 km/s, about 1/3 that of the H$\beta$ lines. Assuming gas temperatures T ~ 15,000 - 25,000 K, the [O III] $\lambda$4364/[O III] $\lambda$5008 ratios of the broad lines yield high gas densities, log n/cm^-3 = 6.3 to 7.9, 3-10$\times$ higher than those in broad-line regions of low-redshift quasars. If the broad-lines trace virial motions, it is evidence for metal-enhanced gas clouds, ~1-10~pc from the LRD engine. Both LRDs show narrow [C III] $\lambda$1907 + C III] $\lambda$1909, and O III] $\lambda\lambda$1661,1666. The C III] ratios yield narrow-line gas densities, log n/cm^-3 = 4.2-5.2, similar to those in other star-forming galaxies. The line equivalent widths, EW(O III]), EW(C III]), are at, or exceed, limits expected for stellar populations, likely requiring an additional ionizing source. The LRDs also have [O III] $\lambda$4364/H$\gamma$ ratios that favor ionization from an accretion disk, possibly combined with stars. Both LRDs show nitrogen enhancement based on detections of N III] $\lambda$1746 or N IV] $\lambda$1486, which may imply rapid, recent star-formation. These results favor a scenario where the LRD gas envelopes are highly stratified, having high-density clouds with a non-unity covering factors and a complex geometry, such that ionizing radiation from the LRD accretion disk, combined with that from star-forming regions, produce the nebular emission features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04101 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. NIRSpec G140M (top panels) and G395M (bottom panels) spectra of C3PO 46403 at z = 6.68. The top portion of each panel shows the 2D spectrum, while in the bottom portion, the solid line shows the extracted 1D spectrum, the dashed line shows the uncertainty, and the dotted line shows zero flux density. The G395M spectrum has an exposure time of 10.3 hrs and covers important rest-optical diagnostic lines, as indicated.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Regions around the locations of detected UV emission lines in the G140M spectrum of C3PO 45290. The top panel shows the regions of N IV] and C IV. The bottom left plot shows the region around He II and O III]. The bottom right plot shows the region around C III]. In ea…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral region around Hγ+[O III] λ4364 (left plot) and Hβ+[O III] λλ4960,5008 (right plot) in the G395M spectrum of C3PO 46403. In each plot, the black lines and errors show the measured data and uncertainties. The solid-red curve (dashed-blue curve) shows broad (narr…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relation between UV emission-line ratios and gas den￾sity. The top panel shows Si III] λ1883 / Si III] λ1892, the mid￾dle panel shows [C III] λ1907 / C III] λ1909, and the bottom panel shows N IV] λ1483 / N IV] λ1486. The predicted curves correspond to different gas te…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relation between [O III] λ4364/[O III] λ5008 emission– line ratio and gas density. The predicted curves correspond to differ￾ent gas temperatures, T, as indicated in the legend. The horizontal lines show the measured value of the line ratio of [O III] λ4364 / [O III] λ…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of rest-frame UV spectra of the C3PO LRDs and stacks of star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 3 with 8 < EW(C III]) < 20 (M. Llerena et al. 2022) and NLAGN at z ∼ 2 (K. N. Hainline et al. 2011). The spectra cover the wavelength range that includes the UV diagnostic l…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: UV emission line diagnostics. Panel (A) shows the C III]/He II ratio versus EW(C III]) for C3PO 46403 (red diamond) and C3PO 45290 (red square) compared to sources and predictions in the literature. Panel (B) shows the O III]/He II ratio versus EW(O III]). Panel (C) s…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: [Ne III]/[O II] versus [O III] 4364/Hγ diagram as a diag￾nostic of AGN ionization. The solid line indicates the region sepa￾rating sources with ionization from AGN only from the region oc￾cupied by AGN or star-forming galaxies from G. Mazzolari et al. (2024, red label…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of emission line profiles for the broad Hβ, [O III]4364, and other lines, as labeled in both galaxies where the emission from the central engine of the LRD has the least impact (see, Section 5.2.1), while probing wavelengths redward of the Lyman-α break. We…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Gas density derived from the [C III] λ1907 / C III] λ1909 ratio for galaxies from the literature and from the C3PO LRDs here as a function of redshift. The literature data include low-redshift galaxies from CLASSY (M. Mingozzi et al. 2022, circles), interme￾diate gala…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., & Keenan, F

    Aggarwal, K. M., & Keenan, F. P. 1999, ApJS, 123, 311, doi: 10.1086/313232

    doi:10.1086/313232 1999

  2. [2]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade984

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade984 2025

  3. [3]

    M., Zakamska, N

    Alexandroff, R. M., Zakamska, N. L., Barth, A. J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4936, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1685

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1685 2018

  4. [4]

    T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O

    Ananna, T. T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJL, 969, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  5. [5]

    1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X Arellano-Córdova, K

    Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X Arellano-Córdova, K. Z., Berg, D. A., Mingozzi, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 1588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1723

    doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  6. [6]

    2026, A&A, 709, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558652 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S

    Arevalo-Gonzalez, F., Tripodi, R., Llerena, M., et al. 2026, A&A, 709, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558652 Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558652 2026

  7. [7]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573

    Asada, Y ., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10573

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10573 2026

  8. [8]

    M., & Grevesse, N

    Asplund, M., Amarsi, A. M., & Grevesse, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140445 2021

Show all 115 references
  1. [9]

    E., Cleri, N

    Backhaus, B. E., Cleri, N. J., Trump, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 125, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1136

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJL, 977, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    2005, MNRAS, 358, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08841.x

    Baskin, A., & Laor, A. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08841.x

    2005

  4. [12]

    C., & Dexter, J

    Begelman, M. C., & Dexter, J. 2026, ApJ, 996, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae274a

    2026 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Rossi, E

    Begelman, M. C., Rossi, E. M., & Armitage, P. J. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 1649, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13344.x

    2008

  6. [14]

    McQuinn, K. B. W. 2019, ApJ, 874, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab020a

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    A., & Green, R

    Boroson, T. A., & Green, R. F. 1992, ApJS, 80, 109, doi: 10.1086/191661

    1992 doi

  8. [16]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, L167, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116

    Brazzini, M., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, L167, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf116

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x

    2004

  10. [18]

    2025,, 1.20.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17515973

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2025,, 1.20.2 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17515973

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    2001, PASP, 113, 1449, doi: 10.1086/324269

    Calzetti, D. 2001, PASP, 113, 1449, doi: 10.1086/324269

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Katz, H., Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 523, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1547

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    M., Akins, H

    Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V ., et al. 2024, ApJL, 975, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7ba7

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    O., Hickox, R

    Casey, Q. O., Hickox, R. C., Cleri, N. J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.26098, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.26098

    2026 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    Chang, S.-J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., & Mason, C. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2131

    2026 doi

  17. [25]

    2023, A&A, 673, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346410

    Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D., Prantzos, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346410

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, ApJL, 1004, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae6dae

    2026 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Yang, G., Papovich, C., et al

    Cleri, N. J., Yang, G., Papovich, C., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 948, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc1e6 22

    doi

  20. [28]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Hutchison, T. A., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 953, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acde55

    doi

  21. [29]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Backhaus, B. E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 146, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0f17

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    C., et al

    Davis, K., Brooks, M., Simons, R. C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.00258, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.00258 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.21820 de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. ...

    2026 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    Feltre, A., Charlot, S., & Gutkin, J. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2794

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labbé, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Duncan, K

    Gloudemans, A. J., Duncan, K. J., Eilers, A.-C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adddb9

    2025 doi

  26. [34]

    A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D

    Guia, C. A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D. D. 2024, Research Notes of the AAS, 8, 207, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    M., van Hoof, P

    Gunasekera, C. M., van Hoof, P. A. M., Dehghanian, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.01102, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.01102

    2025 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    Gutkin, J., Charlot, S., & Bruzual, G. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    N., Shapley, A

    Hainline, K. N., Shapley, A. E., Greene, J. E., & Steidel, C. C. 2011, ApJ, 733, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/31

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y ., Zhang, Y ., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 333, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1256

    Hirschmann, M., Charlot, S., Feltre, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 333, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1256

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 3610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2955

    Hirschmann, M., Charlot, S., Feltre, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2955

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5015

    Hu, W., Papovich, C., Dickinson, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5015

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    A., Papovich, C., Finkelstein, S

    Hutchison, T. A., Papovich, C., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 879, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab22a2

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    A., Larson, R

    Hutchison, T. A., Larson, R. L., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.12509, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2512.12509

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 980, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    Isobe, Y ., Ouchi, M., Tominaga, N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

    Izotov, Y . I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 1228, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1036

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    E., & Ravindranath, S

    Jaskot, A. E., & Ravindranath, S. 2016, ApJ, 833, 136, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/136

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Übler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1867

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodžbalis, I., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2235

    2026 doi

  42. [50]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd938

    Jones, T., Sanders, R., Chen, Y ., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd938

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    E., Ferguson, H

    Jung, I., Ravindranath, S., Jaskot, A. E., Ferguson, H. C., & James, B. L. 2025, ApJ, 988, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adde49 Juodžbalis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03551, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.03551

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    J., Heisler, C

    Kewley, L. J., Heisler, C. A., Dopita, M. A., & Lumsden, S. 2001, ApJS, 132, 37, doi: 10.1086/318944

    2001 doi

  45. [53]

    I., & Lugaro, M

    Kobayashi, C., Karakas, A. I., & Lugaro, M. 2020, ApJ, 900, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abae65

    2020 doi

  46. [54]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, ApJL, 954, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V ., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 968, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

    doi

  49. [57]

    2024b, ApJ, 975, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d03

    Kokorev, V ., Chisholm, J., Endsley, R., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 975, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d03

    doi

  50. [58]

    P., et al

    Kokorev, V ., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1004, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4ed7

    2026 doi

  51. [59]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2024, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.12), [Online]. Available:https://physics.nist.gov/asd[2026, July 21]. National Institute of Standards and Technology,

    2024

  52. [60]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04557 Labbé, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3551

    2024 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09607

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R., Hutchison, T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.09607, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.09607

    2025 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    L., Garofali, K., et al

    Lambrides, E., Larson, R. L., Garofali, K., et al. 2026a, Nature Astronomy, 10, 868, doi: 10.1038/s41550-026-02813-w

    doi

  55. [63]

    A., Larson, R

    Lambrides, E., Hutchison, T. A., Larson, R. L., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.25991, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.25991

    doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    Laor, A., & Davis, S. W. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 3024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2408

    2014 doi

  57. [65]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    Lin, X., Fan, X., Cai, Z., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 364, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2bdf

    2026 doi

  58. [66]

    2022, A&A, 659, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141651

    Llerena, M., Amorín, R., Cullen, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A16, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141651

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    Luridiana, V ., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  60. [68]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.04216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.04216 23

    Madau, P., Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., & D’Eugenio, F. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.04216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.04216 23

    2026 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    2024a, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024a, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    doi

  62. [70]

    2024b, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Witstok, J., et al. 2024b, Nature, 627, 59, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07052-5

    doi

  63. [71]

    2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Signorini, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 1921, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    2025 doi

  64. [72]

    2024, A&A, 681, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Kuruvanthodi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    2024 doi

  65. [73]

    A., James, B

    Martinez, Z., Berg, D. A., James, B. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae17c6

    2025 doi

  66. [74]

    V ., Brinchmann, J., Franx, M., et al

    Maseda, M. V ., Brinchmann, J., Franx, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730985

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2345

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    Matthee, J., Torralba, A., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.17667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.17667

    2026 doi

  69. [77]

    2024, A&A, 691, A345, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450407

    Mazzolari, G., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A345, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450407

    2024 doi

  70. [78]

    J., Finkelstein, S

    McGrath, E. J., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2026, ApJL, 999, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae3da2

    2026 doi

  71. [79]

    L., Arellano-Córdova, K

    Mingozzi, M., James, B. L., Arellano-Córdova, K. Z., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac952c

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    L., Berg, D

    Mingozzi, M., James, B. L., Berg, D. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1033

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    2026, A&A, 710, A321, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558256

    Morel, I., Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., et al. 2026, A&A, 710, A321, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558256

    2026 doi

  74. [82]

    2001, ApJ, 549, 155, doi: 10.1086/319062

    Nagao, T., Murayama, T., & Taniguchi, Y . 2001, ApJ, 549, 155, doi: 10.1086/319062

    2001 doi

  75. [83]

    P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16596

    2025 arXiv

  76. [84]

    P., Watson, D., Pollock, C

    Nikopoulos, G. P., Watson, D., Pollock, C. L., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.31515, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.31515

    2026 doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    Pacucci, F., Ferrara, A., & Kocevski, D. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14368, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.14368

    2026 doi

  78. [86]

    W., Hu, W., et al

    Papovich, C., Cole, J. W., Hu, W., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3b25 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    2026 doi

  79. [87]

    2026, ApJ, 1003, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e6b

    Ronayne, K., Papovich, C., Kirkpatrick, A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e6b

    2026 doi

  80. [88]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 128, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2590

    Rose, M., Tadhunter, C., Ramos Almeida, C., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 128, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2590

    2018 doi

  81. [89]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V ., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09900-4

    2026 doi

  82. [90]

    2025, A&A, 697, A175, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348804

    Scholtz, J., Maiolino, R., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A175, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348804

    2025 doi

  83. [91]

    P., et al

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad235e

    2024 doi

  84. [92]

    J., Greene, J

    Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJL, 991, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade78b

    2025 doi

  85. [93]

    2026, ApJ, 997, 309, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3150

    Shi, Y ., Dai, L., Murray, N., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 309, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3150

    2026 doi

  86. [94]

    H., et al

    Sneppen, A., Watson, D., Matthews, J. H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.18864, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.18864

    2026 doi

  87. [95]

    2018, MNRAS, 477, 2817, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty782

    Sobral, D., Matthee, J., Darvish, B., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 2817, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty782

    2018 doi

  88. [96]

    J., Begelman, M

    Sok, V ., Nelson, E. J., Begelman, M. C., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.23778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.23778

    2026 doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    Q., Naidu, R

    Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 62505, doi: 10.33232/001c.162505

    2026 doi

  90. [98]

    P., Plat, A., et al

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Plat, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfd57

    2025 doi

  91. [99]

    P., Mason, C

    Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Mason, C. A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.03563, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.03563

    2026 doi arXiv

  92. [100]

    2024, MNRAS, 534, 2086, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2191

    Tapia, T., Bekki, K., & Groves, B. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 2086, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2191

    2024 doi

  93. [101]

    J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D

    Taylor, A. J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJL, 989, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade789 The Astropy-Specutils Development Team. 2026,, v2.4.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1421356

    2025 doi

  94. [102]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Endsley, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 4087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae800

    2024 doi

  95. [103]

    W., Sanders, R

    Topping, M. W., Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 1707, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf903

    2025 doi

  96. [104]

    2026, A&A, 707, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557537

    Torralba, A., Matthee, J., Pezzulli, G., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557537

    2026 doi

  97. [105]

    2025, Nature Communications, 16, 9830, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65070-x Übler, H., Maiolino, R., Pérez-González, P

    Tripodi, R., Martis, N., Markov, V ., et al. 2025, Nature Communications, 16, 9830, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65070-x Übler, H., Maiolino, R., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 355, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae943

    2025 doi

  98. [106]

    2026, ApJ, 999, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4101

    Umeda, H., Inayoshi, K., Harikane, Y ., & Murase, K. 2026, ApJ, 999, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4101

    2026 doi

  99. [107]

    2024, ApJL, 969, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    Wang, B., Leja, J., de Graaff, A., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    L., et al

    Wang, B., de Graaff, A., Davies, R. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc1ca

    2025 doi

  101. [109]

    2026, ApJ, 1003, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bab

    Wang, B., Leja, J., Katz, H., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1003, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bab

    2026 doi

  102. [110]

    2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol

    Weldon, A., & Papovich, C. 2026, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 247, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 239.02

    2026

  103. [111]

    A., Coil, A

    Weldon, A., Reddy, N. A., Coil, A. L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4560, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1428

    2024 doi

  104. [112]

    2025, MNRAS, 536, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2535

    Witstok, J., Maiolino, R., Smit, R., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2535

    2025 doi

  105. [113]

    Riffel, R. A. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4680, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa062

    2020 doi

  106. [114]

    T., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Ananna, T. T., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eba 24

    2024 doi

  107. [115]

    Zhu, P., Trussler, J., & Kewley, L. J. 2026, ApJ, 998, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae28d4

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.