Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in harmonic space

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12675 v1 pith:LTQOYPGV submitted 2024-06-18 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords spacegalaxyharmonicbiascataloguesclusteringcovariancedark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We present the joint tomographic analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering in harmonic space, using galaxy catalogues from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). We utilise the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues as lens galaxies and the METACALIBRATION catalogue as source galaxies. The measurements of angular power spectra are performed using the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method, and our theoretical modelling follows the fiducial analyses performed by DES Y3 in configuration space, accounting for galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, magnification bias, shear magnification bias and photometric redshift uncertainties. We explore different approaches for scale cuts based on non-linear galaxy bias and baryonic effects contamination. Our fiducial covariance matrix is computed analytically, accounting for mask geometry in the Gaussian term, and including non-Gaussian contributions and super-sample covariance terms. To validate our harmonic space pipelines and covariance matrix, we used a suite of 1800 log-normal simulations. We also perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of our harmonic space analysis. In the $\Lambda$CDM model, the clustering amplitude $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ is constrained to $S_8 = 0.704\pm 0.029$ and $S_8 = 0.753\pm 0.024$ ($68\%$ C.L.) for the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues, respectively. For the $w$CDM, the dark energy equation of state is constrained to $w = -1.28 \pm 0.29$ and $w = -1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$, for redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues, respectively. These results are compatible with the corresponding DES Y3 results in configuration space and pave the way for harmonic space analyses using the DES Y6 data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. General Relativistic Entropic Acceleration at the perturbation level: a CLASS implementation and first Boltzmann-code constraints

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First full Boltzmann-code implementation of entropic dark energy, with MCMC constraints from CMB+BAO+SN, yields α≈1 and a fit statistically indistinguishable from ΛCDM.

  2. Inflation in non-local hybrid metric-Palatini gravity

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Non-local hybrid metric-Palatini gravity generically contains ghosts, but a degenerate subclass with metric f(R) gravity plus Palatini non-local terms is ghost-free and can drive slow-roll inflation resembling Starobi...

  3. Quadratic estimators for unwindowed power spectrum of galaxy-galaxy weak lensing and its application to $P_{\rm gm}(k)$ estimation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A maximum-likelihood quadratic estimator recovers the window-free E-mode galaxy-galaxy lensing power spectrum to a few percent in simulations and enables 3D P_gm(k) estimation via redshift-sliced lens samples.

  4. Modelling Galaxy Clustering and Tomographic Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing with HSC Y3 and SDSS using the Point-Mass Correction Model and Redshift Self-Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining SDSS clustering with HSC Y3 galaxy-galaxy lensing, with a point-mass correction down to 2 Mpc/h, gives S8 = 0.804 ± 0.051 and self-calibrated redshift shifts for the two highest source bins.

  5. Updated Constraints on Omnipotent Dark Energy: A Comprehensive Analysis with CMB and BAO Data

    gr-qc 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Updated constraints on the DMS20 dark energy model from CMB, BAO, and Pantheon+ data keep it consistent with Lambda CDM while generically producing two phantom-divide crossings; the H0 tension is reduced only with enl...

  6. Neutrinophilic $\mathbf{\Lambda}$CDM Extension for EMPRESS, DESI and Hubble Tension

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A combined fit of EMPRESS, DESI BAO, and CMB data prefers a neutrino asymmetry xi_nu = 0.056 +/- 0.017 and extra radiation delta_Neff = 0.41 +/- 0.16 in a neutrinophilic LambdaCDM model.

  7. Sign Switching in Dark Sector Coupling Interactions as a Candidate for Resolving Cosmological Tensions

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A sign-switching dark-sector coupling, fitted to CMB, DESI BAO, and supernova data, can simultaneously raise H0 and lower S8, but the preference over LambdaCDM depends on using SH0ES-calibrated supernovae.

  8. Alleviating cosmological tensions with a hybrid dark sector

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A one-parameter interacting dark sector model can shift H0 upward and S8 downward when fit to Planck, DESI and supernova data, but the Bayesian evidence over LambdaCDM is inconclusive without SH0ES calibration.

  9. Cosmology with HI Intensity Mapping

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    SKAO HI intensity mapping forecasts yield competitive LambdaCDM constraints (e.g. H0 to ~0.3 km/s/Mpc optimistic) via power spectrum, BAO, bispectrum and stacking, complementary to CMB and optical surveys.

  10. Future Cosmology: New Physics and Opportunity from the China Space Station Telescope (CSST)

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review of CSST cosmological probes forecasting percent-level constraints on dark energy and dark matter from weak lensing, clustering, clusters, voids, SNe Ia, and BAO, based mostly on the authors' prior mock analyses.

Pith tools