Global well-posedness of strong solutions to a model for the morning glory cloud

Dong Wang; Jinkai Li; Yuan Ma

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Global well-posedness of strong solutions to a model for the morning glory cloud

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The morning glory cloud model admits unique global strong solutions for arbitrarily large initial velocity fields.

desk verdict Global strong well-posedness for large H1 data in the Constantin–Johnson morning-glory model; the proof strategy is credible and the result is new, but the write-up compresses several nontrivial estimate steps and leans on an unstated parabolic regularity theorem. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13706 v1 pith:LTWQJAZW submitted 2026-07-15 math.AP

Jinkai Li , Yuan Ma , Dong Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 26D1035Q3535Q8676D0376D0586A0586A10

keywords morningglorycloudglobalwell-posednessstrongsolutionslargeinitialdataaprioriestimatesnonlinearwavepropagationprimitiveequations

topics Navier-Stokes Regularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that a model for the morning glory cloud — a system of PDEs describing nonlinear wave propagation in the troposphere — has a unique global strong solution for any initial horizontal velocity in H¹, as long as the thermodynamic forcing is square-integrable in space and time. Previously, global strong solutions were known only when the initial data satisfied a smallness condition. The proof works by establishing a priori estimates: first L² and L⁴ bounds on the horizontal velocity, then an L² bound on the vertical velocity via a derived evolution equation, and finally the crucial H¹ bound that closes the argument. If correct, the result removes the small-data restriction and shows that strong solutions do not blow up in finite time.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is a two-step energy estimate. First, the vertical velocity w is expressed through the incompressibility condition as w = -∫₀^z ∂x v dξ, and an evolution equation for w is derived from the original system (equation (4.1)), with boundary conditions w|z=0 = 0 and ∂z w|z=1 = 0. Energy estimates on this w-equation yield sup_t ||w||₂² + ∫_0^T ||∇w||₂² dt ≤ C. This control is then used to bound the boundary term that appears when multiplying the v-equation by -Δv and integrating by parts: the term ∫ w ∂z v ∂z²v can be dominated by a product of the already-controlled quantities, allowing the H¹ norm of v to be bounded over any finite time interval. The local well-posedness is obta

What would settle it

A concrete way to test the central claim is to numerically solve the system in a periodic channel with initial data having a large H¹ norm (for example, a steep front). The theorem predicts that ||v(t)||_{H¹} remains bounded on any finite interval; observing a computed finite-time blow-up of this norm would contradict it. A more direct mathematical falsifier would be to find a counterexample to the elliptic estimate used in Proposition 4.4 for the mixed boundary conditions — for instance, exhibit a function in the domain for which the L² norm of Δv is finite but the full H² norm is not control

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: given any initial velocity v0 ∈ H¹(Ω) that is periodic in x and satisfies v0|z=1 = 0, and any forcing K ∈ L²_loc([0,∞);L²(Ω)), the initial-boundary-value problem for the morning glory model has a unique global strong solution. The solution belongs to C([0,T];H¹) ∩ L²(0,T;H²) with ∂t v ∈ L²(0,T;L²) for every finite T. This extends the earlier small-data theory to large data, and the central new step lies in the a priori H¹ estimate: instead of trying to bound ∂zv directly as in the primitive equations, the authors derive an evolution equation for the vertical velocity w and use its energy estimate to control the boundary term that had blocked previous attempt

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that the linear heat equation on the periodic channel with the mixed boundary conditions v|z=1 = ∂z v|z=0 = 0 has the standard L²-based maximal regularity — that is, that a solution with zero initial data and L² forcing lies in L²(0,T;H²) with time derivative in L².

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If Theorem 1.1 is correct, the small-data restriction in the existing literature is removed: strong solutions exist globally for arbitrary H¹ initial data, not just for small L∞ data.
The a priori estimate scheme is robust enough to cover the alternative boundary condition v|z=0 = 0 and the infinite-channel case over R × (0,1), as noted in the remarks.
Since the H¹ norm remains bounded on every finite interval, no finite-time blow-up of strong solutions can occur for this model under the stated assumptions.
The method of controlling a problematic boundary term through an auxiliary evolution equation for the vertical velocity is a generalizable technique for quasilinear systems with one-sided boundary conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The technique of deriving and estimating the vertical velocity equation could be transferred to other quasilinear systems with one-sided boundary conditions, such as certain atmospheric or oceanic models where a boundary term prevents standard energy estimates.
The paper does not address long-time behavior; for large data, questions of decay, attractors, or time-periodic forcing remain open, and the bounds here are only uniform on finite intervals.
The proof leans on a black-box maximal regularity result for the heat operator with mixed boundary conditions. An explicit verification of that regularity on the periodic channel would make the argument self-contained, though the regularity is expected to hold on the smooth cylinder.
A natural numerical check would be to simulate the model with steep initial fronts and track the H¹ norm; the theorem predicts it stays bounded, while a computed growth to infinity would refute the claim.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this paper does what it says. It removes the smallness restriction from Alonso-Orán–Granero-Belinchón and upgrades Matioc–Roberti's local strong solutions to global ones, for all H1 initial data and L2 forcing. The strategy is a standard 2D parabolic bootstrap with one genuinely nonstandard ingredient: instead of trying to close H1 directly, they first derive and estimate an equation for the vertical velocity w (their (4.1)), which lets them control the boundary term ∫ w|∂zv|^2 dx at z=1 that would otherwise block the bootstrap. The w-equation is correctly derived, the boundary conditions are consistent (w=0 at z=0, ∂zw=0 at z=1), and the Grönwall coefficients are in L1(0,T). I checked the main calculations; the structure holds up.

Credit where due: the theorem is new with respect to the cited literature, the proof architecture is genuinely different from [1], and the paper is honest about the source of the w-equation idea (Li–Wang [24]). No circularity, no fitted parameters. This is a straightforward, serious contribution to the primitive-equations energy-method literature.

Soft spots, in order of importance. (1) The unstated linear regularity theory: the fixed-point map uses "standard parabolic theory" for the heat operator with mixed boundary conditions v|z=1 = ∂zv|z=0 = 0, and Prop 4.4 invokes an elliptic estimate to convert ||Δv||_2 control into full ||∇^2v||_2. These are true for this domain (smooth cylinder, complementary Dirichlet/Neumann), but they are load-bearing and should be stated, with references or proofs. (2) The most delicate absorption step — closing the L4 estimate in Prop 4.2 — is compressed. The final inequality appears to follow by Young with the right powers, but the text jumps from a long chain to the conclusion; a referee will need to see the details. (3) The contraction estimates in Propositions 3.2–3.3 are handled loosely (T^1/4 versus T^1/2 mix), though the logic seems sound. (4) The blow-up criterion (5.1) is asserted without proof; easy to justify, but it should be shown. These are addressable gaps, not demonstrated errors. They are all in the "written proof needs expansion" category.

Who this is for: PDE people working on the Constantin–Johnson model or on 2D/3D primitive-equation-type systems. They will get a clear template for how to handle one-sided boundary conditions on the vertical velocity. The paper deserves a serious referee; the core argument is credible and the result, if confirmed, settles the natural open end of the problem.

I recommend sending it to peer review. The gaps I found are fixable and the main theorem is likely correct.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Constantin-Johnson asymptotic model for the morning glory cloud. It claims global strong well-posedness for initial data v0 ∈ H¹ of arbitrary size, with forcing K ∈ L²_loc([0,∞);L²), improving on the small-data result of Alonso-Orán and Granero-Belinchón. The proof combines a contraction-mapping local existence theorem (Section 3) with global a priori estimates (Section 4): L∞_t L²_x ∩ L²_t H¹_x for v, L∞_t L⁴_x for v, L∞_t L²_x ∩ L²_t H¹_x for the vertical velocity w, and finally L∞_t H¹_x ∩ L²_t H²_x for v. The key novelty is deriving an evolution equation for w and using w-estimates to control the otherwise problematic boundary term in the H¹ estimate. The local well-posedness is obtained via a contraction mapping in X_T, and the global result follows by a maximal-time argument.

Significance. If correct, the result removes the smallness restriction in [1] and is a genuine contribution to the mathematical theory of this atmospheric model. The estimate chain is structurally plausible, and the paper is free of adjustable parameters. The method of introducing and estimating the w-equation is a useful technique that may transfer to related asymptotic models. However, the proof relies on unstated parabolic and elliptic regularity results for the mixed boundary-value problem; these must be supplied for the result to be fully rigorous. The paper is otherwise clearly written and the main argument is credible.

major comments (3)

[§3 (Prop 3.1) and §4 (Prop 4.4)] The proof invokes two linear regularity results without statement or proof: (i) at (3.3), 'standard parabolic theory' giving U ∈ C([0,T];H¹) ∩ L²(0,T;H²) with ∂tU ∈ L² for the heat equation with boundary conditions U|z=1 = ∂zU|z=0 = 0 and initial data v0 ∈ H¹; and (ii) in Prop 4.4, the 'elliptic estimate' used to convert ||Δv||₂ control into the full ||∇²v||₂ bound. Both are load-bearing: the first makes the contraction map F land in X_T, and the second closes the H¹ bootstrap. Since the boundary combination (periodic in x, Dirichlet at z=1, Neumann at z=0) is not the pure Dirichlet or pure Neumann case, the authors should state and prove, or give a precise reference for, these maximal-regularity and elliptic estimates. As written, a reader cannot tell whether the domain of the Laplacian and its H¹-interpolant have the required properties.
[§4, Eq. (4.1)] The evolution equation for w is stated after 'one can verify from (1.1) by direct calculations' but the calculation is not shown. This equation is central: all subsequent w-estimates (Prop 4.3) and therefore the H¹ bootstrap depend on its exact form. In particular, the derivation involves commuting ∂x with ∫_0^z, integration by parts in z, and the boundary term ∂zw|z=1 = 0 inherited from v|z=1 = 0. Please include the derivation, or at least a sufficiently detailed outline, so that the reader can check the signs and boundary terms.
[§3, definition of X_T] The space X_T is defined with the condition ∂zφ|z=0 = 0. For functions in L∞(0,T;H¹) ∩ L²(0,T;H²) the trace of ∂zφ on z=0 is meaningful only for a.e. t>0, not as a continuous condition up to t=0. The initial data v0 is only assumed to satisfy v0|z=1 = 0; if X_T imposes ∂zφ|z=0 = 0 at all times, the fixed point would force ∂zv0|z=0 = 0. The trace interpretation of the boundary conditions should be clarified (e.g., in the sense of L²(0,T;L²_x) for the H² part), and the local well-posedness statement should be framed so that no spurious compatibility condition on v0 is introduced.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and Theorem 1.1] The abstract states K ∈ L²(0,T;L²) while Theorem 1.1 states K ∈ L²_loc([0,∞);L²). Make the statement consistent.
[Section 1] Typographical errors: 'repectively' in the notation paragraph, and 'soltions' in Remark 1.2. Also some equations have missing spacing.
[Lemma 2.1] The proof of Lemma 2.1 is typeset densely and hard to read. Rewrite the interpolation chain with clear parentheses and line breaks.
[Section 4, Prop 4.4] The step '≤ μ/2 ||∇²v||₂² + ...' implicitly uses the elliptic estimate on Δv. Add an explicit statement or equation number for this estimate so the reader can see where it enters.
[References] Reference [24] is an unpublished preprint. If it is essential for the w-estimate idea, consider providing a detailed statement of the result used or a more public reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the theorem follows from explicit a priori estimates and a contraction argument; the sole self-citation is methodological provenance.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 1.1 is obtained by combining a local contraction-mapping existence argument (Section 3) with global-in-time a priori estimates (Section 4) and a maximal-time contradiction (Section 5). The fixed-point map solves a linear heat equation with right-hand side G(v); its regularity is imported from standard parabolic theory and the elliptic estimate, both external regularity results rather than consequences of the target theorem. The a priori bounds are derived directly from the PDE by energy estimates, with the boundary terms handled through the derived equation for w (4.1). The only meaningful self-citation is Li-Wang [24], cited as 'following the idea in Li-Wang [24]' for the strategy of first obtaining L2 estimates on v^2 and then on w; but the cited work is not used to validate the present theorem, and the estimates themselves are performed in this paper. No fitted parameters are introduced, no quantity is defined in terms of the claimed conclusion, and no result is renamed as a prediction. The unproven linear regularity hypotheses noted by the reader are correctness risks, not circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters: α, β, μ enter as given model constants, not fitted or hand-tuned, and the proof introduces no adjustable constants set by data or by the target result. The central claim rests on the physical/model validity of (1.1)–(1.2) (bears on interpretation only), standard linear parabolic/elliptic regularity for the mixed-boundary channel (invoked at (3.3) and Prop 4.4), and the standard maximal-continuation criterion (used in §5). No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The Constantin–Johnson system (1.1) with boundary conditions (1.2) is the correct model for morning-glory wave propagation in the troposphere.
Taken from [13] without re-derivation (Section 1, Eq. (1.1)). If the model or the boundary configuration (v|z=1=0, ∂zv|z=0=0, w|z=0=0, w|z=1 free) is not the right physics, the theorem concerns a mathematical idealization rather than the cloud phenomenon. Does not affect the internal validity of the theorem.
standard math Standard linear parabolic/elliptic regularity for the heat operator on T×(0,1) with mixed boundary conditions (Dirichlet at z=1, Neumann at z=0, x-periodic): the solution operator of (3.1)–(3.2) maps L²-forcing and H¹-data into C([0,T];H¹)∩L²(0,T;H²) with ∂tU ∈ L², and ‖v‖_{H²} ≲ ‖Δv‖₂ + ‖v‖₂.
Invoked at (3.3) ('the standard parabolic theory implies') and in Prop 4.4 ('elliptic estimate'). Called upon without statement or proof; true for this smooth cylinder geometry, but it is a load-bearing background fact.
standard math Maximal-continuation blow-up criterion: a maximal strong solution with finite maximal time T* must satisfy lim_{t→T*} ‖v(t)‖_{H¹} = ∞.
Used in Section 5, Eq. (5.1), to convert the a priori bounds into global existence. Not proven in the text, though it follows from Prop 3.1's dependence of the local time on ‖v0‖_{H¹}.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Global well-posedness of strong solutions to a model for the morning glory cloud." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTWQJAZW

@misc{pith2026260713706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Global well-posedness of strong solutions to a model for the morning glory cloud},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTWQJAZW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13706}
}

abstract

In this paper, we investigate the global well-posedness of strong solution to a model recently derived by Constantin-Johnson \cite{CaJo} which describes the nonlinear wave propagation in the troposphere, especially for the morning glory cloud. Assuming that the initial velocity $v_0\in H^1$ and the thermodynamic forcing term $K\in L^2(0,T;L^2)$, we show that there exists a unique global strong solution to the initial boundary value problem of this system. Similar result was only known before for sufficiently small initial data in the existing literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[1]

D 469 (2024), Paper No

Alonso-Or´an, D.; Granero-Belinch´on, R.:Well-posedness and decay for a non- linear propagation wave model in atmospheric flows, Phys. D 469 (2024), Paper No. 134323, 6 pp

2024
[24]

Li, J.; Wang, D.:Global well-posedness of z-weak solution for 3D primitive equa- tion with horizontal eddy dissipation, preprint
[2]

Birch, C.R.; Reeder, M.J.:Wave-cloud lines over northwest australia, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 139, pp. 1311–1326 (2013)

2013
[3]

Bresch, D. ; Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, F.; Masmoudi, N.; Rodr ´ ıguez-Bellido, M.A.:On the uniqueness of weak solutions of the two-dimensional primitive equations, Dif- ferential Integral Equations16(2003), 77–94

2003
[4]

S.:Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous prim- itive equations of the large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics, Ann

Cao, C.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous prim- itive equations of the large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics, Ann. Math. 166(2007), 245–267. 12 JINKAI LI, YUAN MA, AND DONG W ANG

2007
[5]

S.:Golbal well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with par- tial vertical turbulence mixing heat diffusivity, Comm

Cao, C.; Titi, E. S.:Golbal well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with par- tial vertical turbulence mixing heat diffusivity, Comm. Math. Phys.310(2012), 537–568

2012
[6]

S.:Global well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with horizontal viscosity and vertical diffusivity, Physica

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with horizontal viscosity and vertical diffusivity, Physica. D.412(2020), 132606, 25 pp

2020
[7]

S.:Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with horizontal eddy diffusivity, J

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with horizontal eddy diffusivity, J. Differential Equations. 257(2014), 4108–4132

2014

Show all 31 references

[8]

S.:Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with only horizontal viscosity and diffusivity, Comm

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with only horizontal viscosity and diffusivity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.69(2016), 1492–1531

2016
[9]

S.:Strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with only horizontal dissipation: nearH 1 initial data, J

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with only horizontal dissipation: nearH 1 initial data, J. Funct. Anal.272(2017), 4606–4641

2017
[10]

S.:Local and global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with vertical eddy diffusivity, Arch

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Local and global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with vertical eddy diffusivity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.214(2014), 35–76

2014
[11]

Cao, C.; Li, J. Titi, E. S.; Wang, D.:Global well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with horizontal viscosity and vertical diffusivity II: close toH 1 initial data, arXiv: 2408.06932, preprint

arXiv
[12]

Christie, D.R.:The morning glory of the gulf of carpentaria: a paradigm for nonlinear waves in the lower atmosphere, Austral. Meteor. Mag. 41, pp. 21–60 (1992)

1992
[13]

S.:On the propagation of nonlinear waves in the atmosphereProc

Constantin, A.; Johnson, R. S.:On the propagation of nonlinear waves in the atmosphereProc. A. 478 (2022), no. 2260, Paper No. 20210895, 26 pp

2022
[14]

Ann., 1432– 1807 (2023)

Constantin, A.; Johnson, R.S.:Atmospheric undular bores, Math. Ann., 1432– 1807 (2023)

2023
[15]

Crook, N.; Roff, G.; Smith, R.K.:The morning glory: An extraordinary atmo spheric undular bore, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 108, pp. 937–956 (1982)

1982
[16]

Guo, B.; Huang, D.:On the 3D viscous primitive equations of the large-scale atmosphere, Acta Mathematica Scientia.29(2009), no.4 846–866

2009
[17]

Differential Equations261(2016), 6950–6981

Hieber, M.; Hussein, A.; Kashiwabara, T.:Global strongL p well-posedness of the three dimensional primitive equations with heat and salinity diffusion, J. Differential Equations261(2016), 6950–6981

2016
[18]

Hieber, M.; Kashiwabara, T.:Global strong well-posedness of the three dimen- sional primitive equations inL p-spaces, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.221(2016), 1077–1115

2016
[19]

Holst, P.; Rademacher, J.:Well-posedness and long-term behaviour for a tropo- sphere wave propagation model.IMA J. Appl. Math. 90 (2025), no. 5, 515–540

2025
[20]

M.:Existence of a solution in the large for the 3D large-scale ocean dynamics equations, C

Kobelkov, G. M.:Existence of a solution in the large for the 3D large-scale ocean dynamics equations, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris343(2006), 283–286. NONLINEAR W A VE PROPAGATION IN THE TROPOSPHERE 13

2006
[21]

Kukavica, I.; Pei, Y.; Ziane, W.:Primitive equations with continuous initial data, Nonlinearity27(2004), 1135–1155

2004
[22]

Kukavica, I.; Ziane, W.:On the regularity of the primitive equations of the ocean, Nonlinearity20(2007), 2739–2753

2007
[23]

S.:Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to viscous primitive equations for a certain class of discontinuous initial data, SIAM J

Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to viscous primitive equations for a certain class of discontinuous initial data, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49(2017), 1–28

2017
[25]

Li, J.; Yuan, G.:Global well-posedness of z-weak solutions to the primitive equa- tions without vertical diffusivity, J. Math. Phys.63(2022), no. 2, Paper No. 021501, 24 pp

2022
[26]

L.; Temam, R.; Wang, S.:New formulations of the primitive equations of the atmosphere and appliations, Nonlinearity5(1992), 237–288

Lions, J. L.; Temam, R.; Wang, S.:New formulations of the primitive equations of the atmosphere and appliations, Nonlinearity5(1992), 237–288

1992
[27]

L.; Temam, R.; Wang, S.:On the equations of the large-scale ocean, Nonlinearity5(1992), 1007–1053

Lions, J. L.; Temam, R.; Wang, S.:On the equations of the large-scale ocean, Nonlinearity5(1992), 1007–1053

1992
[28]

L.; Temam, R.; Wang, S.:Mathematical study of the coupled models of atmosphere and ocean(CAO III), J

Lions, J. L.; Temam, R.; Wang, S.:Mathematical study of the coupled models of atmosphere and ocean(CAO III), J. Math. Pures Appl74(1995), 105–163

1995
[29]

Differential Equations 367 (2023), 603–624

Matioc, B.; Roberti, L.:Weak and classical solutions to an asymptotic model for atmospheric flowsJ. Differential Equations 367 (2023), 603–624

2023
[30]

Simon, J.:Compact sets in the spaceL p(0,T;B), Ann. Mat. Pure Appl.146 (1987), 65–96

1987
[31]

Real World Appl

Tachim-Medjo, T.:On the uniqueness of z-weak solutions of the three- dimensional primitive equations of the ocean, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 11(2010), no. 3, 1413–1421. (Jinkai Li)South China Research Center for Applied Mathematics and Interdisci- plinary Studies, Schoo...

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

D 469 (2024), Paper No

Alonso-Or´an, D.; Granero-Belinch´on, R.:Well-posedness and decay for a non- linear propagation wave model in atmospheric flows, Phys. D 469 (2024), Paper No. 134323, 6 pp

2024

[2] [24]

Li, J.; Wang, D.:Global well-posedness of z-weak solution for 3D primitive equa- tion with horizontal eddy dissipation, preprint

[3] [2]

Birch, C.R.; Reeder, M.J.:Wave-cloud lines over northwest australia, Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 139, pp. 1311–1326 (2013)

2013

[4] [3]

Bresch, D. ; Guill´ en-Gonz´ alez, F.; Masmoudi, N.; Rodr ´ ıguez-Bellido, M.A.:On the uniqueness of weak solutions of the two-dimensional primitive equations, Dif- ferential Integral Equations16(2003), 77–94

2003

[5] [4]

S.:Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous prim- itive equations of the large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics, Ann

Cao, C.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous prim- itive equations of the large scale ocean and atmosphere dynamics, Ann. Math. 166(2007), 245–267. 12 JINKAI LI, YUAN MA, AND DONG W ANG

2007

[6] [5]

S.:Golbal well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with par- tial vertical turbulence mixing heat diffusivity, Comm

Cao, C.; Titi, E. S.:Golbal well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with par- tial vertical turbulence mixing heat diffusivity, Comm. Math. Phys.310(2012), 537–568

2012

[7] [6]

S.:Global well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with horizontal viscosity and vertical diffusivity, Physica

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of the 3D primitive equations with horizontal viscosity and vertical diffusivity, Physica. D.412(2020), 132606, 25 pp

2020

[8] [7]

S.:Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with horizontal eddy diffusivity, J

Cao, C.; Li, J.; Titi, E. S.:Global well-posedness of strong solutions to the 3D primitive equations with horizontal eddy diffusivity, J. Differential Equations. 257(2014), 4108–4132

2014