Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

MUSEQuBES: Unveiling Cosmic Web Filaments at $z\approx3.6$ through Dual Absorption and Emission Line Analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The authors report the first direct detection of a cosmic filament feeding normal galaxies, identified by an extremely metal-poor absorbing gas at $z\approx3.6$ and a giant Lyman-alpha nebula extending about 260 pkpc.

desk verdict A genuinely interesting single-object discovery, but the paper's own boosted radiation field for the nebula is not applied to the absorber, and that tension needs to be resolved before the pristine-filament claim is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04546 v2 pith:LUCV7Z6X submitted 2024-12-05 astro-ph.GA

Eshita Banerjee , Sowgat Muzahid , Joop Schaye , Sebastiano Cantalupo , Sean D. Johnson This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords cosmicwebfilamentsLyman-alphaemittersLyman-limitsystemsnebulaquasarabsorptionlinesintegralfieldspectroscopyhigh-redshiftgalaxiesphotoionizationmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cosmological simulations predict that galaxies grow by accreting gas through a network of cosmic filaments, yet the gas in those filaments is so diffuse that direct detections have remained rare. This paper reports a system at $z\approx3.577$ where three independent lines of evidence line up: an extremely metal-poor, low-density partial Lyman limit system seen in absorption against a background quasar; seven Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters arranged in a statistically unlikely near-linear overdensity; and a giant Lyman-$\alpha$ nebula extending roughly 260 pkpc along the same axis. The authors argue that this combination is the first direct detection of a cosmic filament feeding normal galaxies, with the nebula powered by in-situ recombination of gas photoionized by the metagalactic ultraviolet background boosted by the overdensity. If correct, this opens a direct observational window onto the cold gas supply that drives galaxy formation at high redshift.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the combined use of two orthogonal probes of the same volume. A background quasar acts as a backlight: vpfit Voigt-profile fits to the Lyman series and to C IV and Si IV doublets fix the neutral hydrogen column densities and Doppler parameters of the absorbing components, and a Cloudy photoionization grid, with Bayesian inference via UltraNest, converts the observed ionic column densities into hydrogen density and metallicity under the HM05 and KS18 ultraviolet background models; the absorbing gas is treated as a uniform slab in ionization equilibrium. MUSE integral-field spectroscopy supplies the other probe: after point-spread-function and continuum subtraction, CubEx source finding recovers the faint extended nebula and the seven LAEs in the same three-dimensional data cube. The load-bearing link is the system S2: its derived density and metallicity place it in filament territory, and its velocity offset of roughly $-60\ {\rm km\ s^{-1}}$ places it next to five clustered LAEs and within the roughly 260-pkpc nebula, so that absorption and emission are tied to one structure.

What would settle it

Point a second quasar sightline within about 100 pkpc of G7 at the same redshift: a real filament should appear as coherent low-density, low-metallicity absorption across both sightlines, while an isolated circumgalactic blob would not. In the same field, measuring the nebula's resolved Ly-alpha kinematics and finding that they disagree with the absorber's velocity structure would argue against simple in-situ recombination of the same gas.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At $z\approx3.577$ toward the quasar Q1317-0507, the paper identifies a system it calls G7 and claims it is a cosmic filament. In absorption, simultaneous Voigt-profile fitting of the Lyman series and of C IV and Si IV yields three metal-poor components: S1 with $[X/H]\approx-1.98$, S2 with $[X/H]\approx-3.69$, and S3 with $[X/H]\approx-2.58$, with hydrogen densities between $\log_{10} n_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-3}\approx -2.6$ and $-4.0$; S2, a partial Lyman limit system (neutral hydrogen column density $10^{16.7}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$), has $\log_{10} n_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-3}\approx -4.0$, corresponding to an overdensity of about five, in the regime expected for a cosmic filament rather than a galaxy halo. In emission, MUSE reveals seven Lyman-$\alpha$ emitters whose number is a $3\times10^{-6}$ to $2\times10^{-5}$ Poisson fluctuation of the luminosity function and whose positions align with only about 0.3% chance probability; the same data cube contains a giant Lyman-$\alpha$ nebula with surface brightness at least $10^{-19}\ {\rm erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}\ arcsec^{-2}}$ and a maximum projected size of about 260 pkpc running along the LAE chain. The paper's central claim is that the velocity and spatial coincidence of the metal-poor absorber S2, the LAE overdensity, and the giant nebula constitutes the first detection of giant Lyman-$\alpha$ emission tracing cosmic filaments, linked to normal galaxies and likely powered by in-situ recombination.

Load-bearing premise

The inference that S2 is extremely metal-poor and low-density assumes the absorbing gas is a uniform cloud lit almost entirely by the cosmic ultraviolet background, with the seven detected galaxies contributing only a small correction; if the local radiation from those galaxies is much stronger, the same absorption would imply denser, more metal-rich gas.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Giant Lyman-alpha nebulae can be produced by normal star-forming galaxies in overdense regions, not only by quasars or active galactic nuclei.
  • At $z\gtrsim3.5$, partial and full Lyman limit systems can trace intergalactic filaments rather than only circumgalactic gas, consistent with cold-mode accretion simulations.
  • Overdense, near-linear arrangements of Lyman-alpha emitters can serve as signposts for underlying cosmic-web filaments.
  • The system S2 provides a direct measurement of the density, overdensity, and metallicity of gas accreting onto galaxies: $\log_{10} n_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-3}\approx -4$, $\delta\approx5$, $[X/H]\approx-3.7$.
  • Combining quasar absorption sightlines with integral-field spectroscopy can reveal the cosmic web in three dimensions at high redshift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A statistical sample could be built from archival MUSE fields by first finding LAE overdensities in the galaxy cubes and then checking quasar spectra for aligned low-density, low-metallicity absorbers; the method would not need new observations.
  • If the filament interpretation holds, the fraction of extremely metal-poor LLSs and pLLSs at $z\approx3.6$ would likely exceed the roughly 18% measured at $z\approx3$, because G7 shows pristine gas is present on filament scales rather than confined to rare halos.
  • The measured overdensity $\delta\approx5$ and density $\log_{10} n_{\rm H}/{\rm cm}^{-3}\approx -4$ give a concrete benchmark that cosmological simulations of cold accretion can be asked to reproduce; a simulation that never produces such low-density, metal-poor self-shielded gas at $z\approx3.6$ would be in tension with this detection.
  • Because only one of the seven LAEs is included in the local radiation correction, future photometry or spectroscopy of the other six could shift the inferred density by a few tenths of a dex, so the low-density label is the part of the claim most worth retesting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports MUSE/UVES/X-shooter observations toward Q1317−0507 and identifies a group (G7) of seven Lyα emitters at z≈3.577. It measures three intervening absorption systems (S1–S3); S2 is a partial Lyman limit system with inferred [X/H]≈−3.7 and log nH≈−4, which the authors interpret as extremely metal-poor, low-density gas tracing a cosmic filament. A giant Lyα nebula extending ≈260 pkpc is found in MUSE data, aligned with the LAEs, and the paper argues that it is powered by in-situ recombination from the same overdense structure. The central claim is that this constitutes the first direct detection of a cosmic filament through combined absorption and emission tracing.

Significance. If correct, this is a notable result: it connects a quantitative absorption-line measurement of pristine, low-density gas to a galaxy overdensity and a large Lyα nebula at z≈3.6, providing a potential direct view of filamentary gas accretion. The analysis uses standard and publicly available tools (VPFIT, Cloudy, UltraNest, CubEx), and the authors report statistical significances and systematic checks with two UVB models. The main value is the combination of three independent probes (absorption, LAE distribution, nebular emission) on the same structure. However, the interpretation relies on the assumed absence of a local ionizing radiation field in the absorption-line modeling and on the statistical significance of a group selected as the richest in the survey.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2 and §4.2] The photoionization inference for S2 assumes illumination only by the HM05/KS18 metagalactic UVB, while §4.2 invokes a boost of the UV background by a factor comparable to the galaxy overdensity (≈10×) to explain the Lyα surface brightness. S2 is within 100–200 pkpc of the five clustered LAEs and at their velocity centroid, so the same boosted radiation field should be incident on it. Because the derived nH scales approximately linearly with the ionizing photon density at fixed ionization parameter, a 10× boost would shift log nH from about −3.95 to about −3.0 and change the quoted overdensity of ≈5 to ≈50; the inferred [X/H] could also shift if the local spectrum differs from the UVB. The authors should rerun the S2 models with a self-consistent local radiation field (or at least bracket the effect of a 10× boost) and revisit the 'extremely metal-poor, low-density filament' characterization.
  2. [§4.1] The Poisson probability of 3×10−6 for detecting seven LAEs is computed for a pre-specified volume, but G7 was selected as the most LAE-rich system in the MUSEQuBES sample. The look-elsewhere factor for the number of independent group searches should be estimated and applied, and the same applies to the 0.3% alignment probability, which is evaluated for the richest group. Without this correction the quoted significances overstate the evidence; the conclusion would be more robust if the trial factor is shown to be modest.
  3. [§4.1/Figure 4] The reality of the extended Lyα nebula is currently supported only by a connected-voxel threshold (SNR≥1.8, >3500 voxels) and the statement that it spans 16 wavelength layers. Given the low per-voxel SNR and the spatial smoothing applied, a formal false-positive estimate (e.g., noise realizations or randomized source positions) should be provided. This is important because the nebula is a central element of the 'first detection' claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.3] The Gaussian prior on log nH for S3 is motivated by maximizing the CIV ion fraction; since S3 is used as supporting evidence for low metallicity, the authors should state how the results depend on this prior and provide a flat-prior comparison if available.
  2. [Abstract and §4.2] The paper calls this 'the first detection of giant Lyα emission tracing cosmic filaments, linked to normal galaxies,' but it also cites Tornotti et al. (2024b) as 'another recent example.' The novelty claim should be qualified to avoid contradiction with contemporaneous work.
  3. [§1 and §3.2] The definition of [X/H] in the introduction uses the solar metallicity of Grevesse et al. (2012), while the Cloudy models assume Asplund et al. (2009) abundances; the consistency of these abundance scales should be stated explicitly.
  4. [§3.2] The reported uncertainties on [X/H] and nH are formal posterior intervals; a brief statement of systematic uncertainties from the assumed uniform-slab geometry and from variations in the ionizing spectrum would help the reader gauge the robustness of the central claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: absorption-line fitting, LAE overdensity statistics, and nebula detection are independent steps; the UVB radiation-field tension is a modeling assumption, not a reduction by construction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required by the circularity check. The [X/H] and nH values for S1/S2/S3 are obtained by fitting Cloudy photoionization models to measured H I and metal column densities (Sections 3.2 and 3.3), which is standard parameter estimation, not a prediction of the fitted inputs. The LAE overdensity is tested against the independent luminosity function of Drake et al. (2017) and Herenz et al. (2019), and the linear alignment is assessed with a Monte Carlo random-placement simulation; neither presupposes a filament. The extended Ly-alpha nebula is independently detected with CubEx on PSF- and continuum-subtracted MUSE data, and the claim that it is powered by in-situ recombination is an interpretation comparing the observed surface brightness to the UVB-only expectation (Section 4.2). The only internal tension is that the absorption-line models for S2 exclude the LAE radiation field that Section 4.2 invokes to explain the nebula, but this is a systematic modeling assumption (and is acknowledged with a 0.33 dex correction for LAE Id:2), not a step in which the conclusion is assumed by construction or by self-citation. Self-citations to MUSEQuBES survey data papers (Muzahid et al. 2020, 2021; Banerjee et al. 2023, 2024) provide the data products and a Ly-alpha redshift correction, but they are not used to define the physical result; the central claim therefore has independent empirical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard photoionization modeling assumptions and on the inferred parameters [X/H] and nH. No new particles or forces are introduced. The main burden is the uniformity of the absorber and the assumption that the external UV background dominates over local ionizing sources.

free parameters (3)
  • Hydrogen density nH of S2 = log10 nH/cm^-3 = -3.95 (HM05), -4.27 (KS18)
    Fitted to observed H I, C IV, and Si IV column densities via Cloudy grid and Bayesian inference; central to the low-density filament claim.
  • Metallicity [X/H] of S2 = -3.69 (HM05), -4.08 (KS18)
    Co-fitted with nH in the same Bayesian photoionization analysis; central to the extremely metal-poor claim.
  • Density prior for S3 = log10 nH/cm^-3 ≈ -3.5 ± 0.5
    Chosen by hand at the maximum C IV ion fraction because only C IV is detected in S3; an ad hoc modeling choice that can bias the inferred metallicity.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Flat ΛCDM cosmology with H0=70 km/s/Mpc, Ωm=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7
    Section 1: standard cosmological model adopted for distance and overdensity estimates.
  • domain assumption The absorbing gas is a uniform slab in thermal and ionization equilibrium, with solar abundance ratios, no dust, illuminated by the HM05 or KS18 metagalactic UV background plus CMB
    Section 3.2: assumptions for Cloudy photoionization modeling; if local radiation sources contribute, inferred density and metallicity change.
  • domain assumption Lyman-alpha redshifts of LAEs can be corrected to systemic using the empirical relation of Muzahid et al. 2020
    Section 2: used to associate LAEs at z≈3.577 with absorbers; the correction has hundreds of km/s uncertainties.
  • domain assumption The velocity association between absorption systems S1, S2, S3 and G7 LAEs implies physical proximity within a single filament
    Section 4.1: the argument that the absorbers trace the same structure as the LAEs rests on velocity proximity and projected distance, not on direct spatial coincidence.
  • standard math Voigt profile fitting with vpfit correctly separates the roughly 30 H I components and contaminating transitions
    Section 3.1: standard practice for quasar absorption line analysis; the paper addresses contamination explicitly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MUSEQuBES: Unveiling Cosmic Web Filaments at $z\approx3.6$ through Dual Absorption and Emission Line Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LUCV7Z6X

@misc{pith2026241204546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MUSEQuBES: Unveiling Cosmic Web Filaments at $z\approx3.6$ through Dual Absorption and Emission Line Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LUCV7Z6X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04546}
}
abstract

According to modern cosmological models, galaxies are embedded within cosmic filaments, which supply a continuous flow of pristine gas, fueling star formation and driving their evolution. However, due to their low density, the direct detection of diffuse gas in cosmic filaments remains elusive. Here, we report the discovery of an extremely metal-poor ($[ X/H] \approx -3.7$), low-density ($\log_{10} n_{\rm H}/{\rm cm^{-3}} \approx -4$, corresponding to an overdensity of $\approx 5$) partial Lyman limit system (pLLS) at $z\approx3.577$ along the quasar sightline Q1317--0507, probing cosmic filaments. Additionally, two other low-metallicity (\met$\lesssim -2$) absorption systems are detected at similar redshifts, one of which is also a pLLS. VLT/MUSE observations reveal a significant overdensity of \lya\ emitters (LAEs) associated with these absorbers. The spatial distribution of the LAEs strongly suggests the presence of an underlying filamentary structure. This is further supported by the detection of a large \lya\ emitting nebula with a surface brightness of $\geq 10^{-19}~\rm erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}~arcsec^{-2}$, with a maximum projected linear size of $\approx 260$~pkpc extending along the LAEs. This is the first detection of giant \lya\ emission tracing cosmic filaments, linked to normal galaxies and likely powered by in-situ recombination.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04546 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The optimally extracted Lyα surface brightness maps of the 7 LAEs (G7) within the MUSE FOV centered on the quasar Q1317−0507 (marked by the “+” sign). The pixels within the 3D segmentation map for each LAE are combined and projected onto the image, with the gray con￾tours representing the 5 and 25 σ from the mean flux levels of the continuum-bright objects. A Gaussian smoothing func￾tion with σ = 0.2 ′′ (≡ 1 pixel) … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Velocity plot of the G7 system, showing several Lyman-series lines (arranged in descending order of wavelength from bottom to top) along with metal lines detected in the system. The observed spectrum is shown in blue, with the best-fitting model curve from vpfit in red. Fits for contaminating transitions are displayed in green. The black, orange and red ticks mark the positions of individual H i, C iv and Si iv comp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Measured column densities of different transitions associated with S1, S2 and S3 (top to bottom) are shown in red, with upper limits indicated by downward arrows. Blue squares represent the predicted column densities based on the median values of the model parameters from their re￾spective posterior PDFs. The median values of metallicity and nH along with their 16th-84th percentile ranges are dis￾played at the top. … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: displays the SB map (top) of the detected struc￾ture, with the 7 LAEs marked by green squares and (bottom) the SNR map of the same, overlaid on a sin￾gle wavelength layer associated to the extended emis￾sion. The contours in the middle panel highlights the SB level of …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The cosmic web's Lyman-$\alpha$ glow at $z \approx 2.5$; hydrodynamic models, dust, and wide-field, narrow-band detection

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Five cosmological simulations predict that the faint ultraviolet excess seen by the Condor telescope at z≈2.5 is Lyman-alpha light from the cosmic web, with measurable detection thresholds for wide-field surveys.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Bacon, R., Accardo, M., Adjali, L., et al. 2010, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7735, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 773508, doi: 10.1117/12.856027

    doi:10.1117/12.856027 2010

  3. [3]

    2021, A&A, 647, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039887

    Bacon, R., Mary, D., Garel, T., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039887

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039887 2021

  4. [4]

    2023, MNRAS, 524, 5148, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2022

    Cantalupo, S. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 5148, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2022

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2022 2023

  5. [5]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.11959

    Banerjee, E., Muzahid, S., Schaye, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.11959. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11959

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    J., et al

    Borisova, E., Cantalupo, S., Lilly, S. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 39, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/39

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/1/39 2016

  7. [7]

    F., & Madau, P

    Hennawi, J. F., & Madau, P. 2014, Nature, 506, 63, doi: 10.1038/nature12898 8

    doi:10.1038/nature12898 2014

  8. [8]

    J., & Miniati, F

    Cantalupo, S., Porciani, C., Lilly, S. J., & Miniati, F. 2005, ApJ, 628, 61, doi: 10.1086/430758

    doi:10.1086/430758 2005

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    J., et al

    Cantalupo, S., Pezzulli, G., Lilly, S. J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 5188, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3481

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    F., & Webb, J

    Carswell, R. F., & Webb, J. K. 2014, VPFIT: Voigt profile fitting program, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1408.015. http://ascl.net/1408.015

    2014

  3. [11]

    Crighton, N. H. M., Hennawi, J. F., & Prochaska, J. X. 2013, ApJL, 776, L18, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L18

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    Crighton, N. H. M., Hennawi, J. F., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 18, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2088

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    B., Garel, T., Wisotzki, L., et al

    Drake, A. B., Garel, T., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731431

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    J., Porter, R

    Ferland, G. J., Porter, R. L., van Hoof, P. A. M., et al. 2013, RMxAA, 49, 137, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1302.4485

    2013 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    2016a, MNRAS, 462, 1978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1782

    Fumagalli, M., Cantalupo, S., Dekel, A., et al. 2016a, MNRAS, 462, 1978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1782

    1978 doi

  8. [16]

    M., & Prochaska, J

    Fumagalli, M., O’Meara, J. M., & Prochaska, J. X. 2016b, MNRAS, 455, 4100, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2616

    doi

  9. [17]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/78

    Worseck, G. 2013, ApJ, 775, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/78

    2013 doi

  10. [19]

    J., & Scott, P

    Grevesse, N., Asplund, M., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2012, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 462, Progress in Solar/Stellar Physics with Helio- and Asteroseismology, ed. H. Shibahashi, M. Takata, & A. E. Lynas-Gray, 41

    2012

  11. [20]

    2024, A&A, 688, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347658

    Guo, Y., Bacon, R., Wisotzki, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347658

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    2001, in Clusters of Galaxies and the High Redshift Universe Observed in X-rays, ed

    Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 2001, in Clusters of Galaxies and the High Redshift Universe Observed in X-rays, ed. D. M. Neumann & J. T. V. Tran, 64, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0106018

    2001 doi arXiv

  13. [22]

    2012, ApJ, 746, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125

    Haardt, F., & Madau, P. 2012, ApJ, 746, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/125

    2012 doi

  14. [23]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  15. [24]

    Hellsten, U., Hernquist, L., Katz, N., & Weinberg, D. H. 1998, ApJ, 499, 172, doi: 10.1086/305622

    1998 doi

  16. [25]

    C., Wisotzki, L., Saust, R., et al

    Herenz, E. C., Wisotzki, L., Saust, R., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834164

    2019 doi

  17. [26]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.16826, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.16826

    Herwig, E., Arrigoni Battaia, F., Gonz´ alez Lobos, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.16826, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.16826

    2024 doi arXiv

  18. [27]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  19. [28]

    D., Schaye, J., Walth, G

    Johnson, S. D., Schaye, J., Walth, G. L., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2209.04245. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.04245 Kereˇ s, D., Katz, N., Weinberg, D. H., & Dav´ e, R. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x

    2022 arXiv

  20. [29]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 4174, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz174

    Khaire, V., & Srianand, R. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4174, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz174

    2019 doi

  21. [30]

    M., Howk, J

    Lehner, N., O’Meara, J. M., Howk, J. C., Prochaska, J. X., & Fumagalli, M. 2016, ApJ, 833, 283, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/283

    2016 doi

  22. [31]

    B., Howk, J

    Lehner, N., Wotta, C. B., Howk, J. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd03

    2018 doi

  23. [32]

    M., et al

    Lehner, N., Kopenhafer, C., O’Meara, J. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7400

    2022 doi

  24. [33]

    K., Fumagalli, M., Fossati, M., et al

    Lofthouse, E. K., Fumagalli, M., Fossati, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 305, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3089 L´ opez, S., D’Odorico, V., Ellison, S. L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628161

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 5070, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1501

    Mackenzie, R., Fumagalli, M., Theuns, T., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5070, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1501

    2019 doi

  26. [35]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  27. [36]

    Carswell, R. F. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3458, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2834

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    A., et al

    Muzahid, S., Schaye, J., Marino, R. A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1013, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1347

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 5612, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2933

    Muzahid, S., Schaye, J., Cantalupo, S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5612, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2933

    2021 doi

  30. [39]

    X., Werk, J

    Prochaska, J. X., Werk, J. K., Worseck, G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 169, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6007

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    C., & Rudie, G

    Rakic, O., Schaye, J., Steidel, C. C., & Rudie, G. C. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3265, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18624.x

    2011

  32. [41]

    C., et al

    Ribaudo, J., Lehner, N., Howk, J. C., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 207, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/207

    2011 doi

  33. [42]

    2001, ApJ, 559, 507, doi: 10.1086/322421

    Schaye, J. 2001, ApJ, 559, 507, doi: 10.1086/322421

    2001 doi

  34. [43]

    2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 788, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/74

    Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 788, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/74

    2014 doi

  35. [44]

    C., Erb, D

    Steidel, C. C., Erb, D. K., Shapley, A. E., et al. 2010, The Astrophysical Journal, 717, 289, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/289

    2010 doi

  36. [45]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.17035, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.17035 —

    Tornotti, D., Fumagalli, M., Fossati, M., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.17035, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.17035 —. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06895, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06895 9 van de Voort, F., Schaye, J., Altay, G., & Theuns, T. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2809, d...

    doi arXiv

  37. [46]

    2018, MNRAS, 478, L60, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly058

    Verhamme, A., Garel, T., Ventou, E., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 478, L60, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly058

    2018 doi

  38. [47]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.