Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Impact of Reference-Command Preview on Human-in-the-Loop Control Behavior

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.15633 v1 pith:LUK7ADR6 submitted 2023-08-29 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords previewsubjectsreferencebehaviorcommandcontrolgroupsperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This article presents results from an experiment in which 44 human subjects interact with a dynamic system to perform 40 trials of a command-following task. The reference command is unpredictable and different on each trial, but all subjects have the same sequence of reference commands for the 40 trials. The subjects are divided into 4 groups of 11 subjects. One group performs the command-following task without preview of the reference command, and the other 3 groups are given preview of the reference command for different time lengths into the future (0.5 s, 1 s, 1.5 s). A subsystem identification algorithm is used to obtain best-fit models of each subject's control behavior on each trial. The time- and frequency-domain performance, as well as the identified models of the control behavior for the 4 groups are examined to investigate the effects of reference-command preview. The results suggest that preview tends to improve performance by allowing the subjects to compensate for sensory time delay and approximate the inverse dynamics in feedforward. However, too much preview may decrease performance by degrading the ability to use the correct phase lead in feedforward.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools