pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10220 · v1 · pith:LVCL2KEFnew · submitted 2019-06-24 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.app-ph· physics.plasm-ph

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Corona Discharge Induced Flow on a Flat Plate

Ravi Sankar Vaddi , Yifei Guan , Zhi Yan Chen , Alexander Mamishev , Igor Novosselov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 16:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.app-phphysics.plasm-ph
keywords corona dischargeelectrohydrodynamic flowwall jetion transportNavier-Stokes equationsflow controlparticle collectorsflat plate
0
0 comments X

The pith

A coupled numerical model reproduces the 1.7 m/s wall jet created by corona discharge on a flat plate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates electrohydrodynamic flow generated by corona discharge between two electrodes placed in the boundary layer on a flat plate. Experiments measure the resulting wall jet velocity profile, which peaks at 1.7 m/s with roughly 2 percent energy efficiency, using hotwire anemometry. A multiphysics simulation solves the ion transport equation together with the Navier-Stokes equations to obtain the electric field, charge density, and flow field at each point. The simulation results closely match the measured velocities and provide detailed information on how mass, charge, and momentum are transported. This understanding supports the use of such flows in boundary layer control and particle collection devices.

Core claim

The multiphysics numerical model that couples the ion transport equation to the Navier-Stokes equations produces electric field, charge density, and velocity distributions that agree with experimental measurements of the EHD-driven wall jet, thereby illuminating the underlying transport processes.

What carries the argument

The coupled solver for ion transport and fluid momentum equations that determines the self-consistent electric field and resulting flow.

If this is right

  • The EHD flow acts as a wall jet with velocity dropping rapidly away from the surface.
  • Maximum velocity reaches 1.7 m/s at an energy conversion efficiency of approximately 2%.
  • The model enables prediction of charge and flow fields for design purposes.
  • The flow can support strategies for boundary layer control.
  • Similar actuators could be used in novel particle collector designs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the match holds without parameter tuning, the same equations could forecast performance for varied electrode arrangements.
  • Transport insights might apply to unsteady or three-dimensional electrode configurations not tested here.
  • Particle collection efficiency could be estimated by combining the flow field with particle trajectory calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The ion transport model together with the fluid equations fully accounts for the observed flow without hidden electrode effects or secondary processes.

What would settle it

An experiment in which changing the applied voltage or electrode gap produces velocity profiles that the simulation cannot match unless new parameters are introduced.

read the original abstract

Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) flow induced by planar corona discharge in the wall boundary layer region is investigated experimentally and via a multiphysics computational model. The EHD phenomena has many potential engineering applications, its optimization requires a mechanistic understanding of the ion and flow transport. The corona EHD actuator consisting of two electrodes located in the wall boundary layer creates an EHD driven wall jet. The applied voltage between the electrodes is varied and the resulting effects in the charge density and flow field are measured. Constant current hotwire anemometry is used to measure velocity profile. The airflow near the wall acts a jet and it reaches a maximum of 1.7 m/s with an energy conversion efficiency of ~2%. The velocity decreases sharply in the normal direction. Multiphysics numerical model couples ion transport equation and the Navier Stokes equations to solve for the spatiotemporal distribution of electric field, charge density and flow field. The numerical results match experimental data shedding new insights into mass, charge and momentum transport phenomena. The EHD driven flow can be applied to flow control strategies and design of novel particle collectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements of corona-discharge-induced EHD wall-jet flow on a flat plate using constant-current hot-wire anemometry, with a reported maximum velocity of 1.7 m/s and ~2% energy conversion efficiency. A multiphysics numerical model coupling the ion transport equation to the Navier-Stokes equations is presented; the authors state that the numerical results match the experimental velocity profiles and thereby provide new insights into mass, charge, and momentum transport, with suggested applications to flow control and particle collectors.

Significance. If the model parameters (ion mobility, recombination coefficients, and electrode charge-injection law) are taken from independent literature values without adjustment to the presented hot-wire data, the reported agreement would constitute a non-trivial validation of the coupled transport model and support the claimed mechanistic insights. The quantitative velocity and efficiency benchmarks are of interest to the EHD community for engineering applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model description and results sections] The abstract and model description do not state the provenance of the key model parameters (ion mobility, recombination rate, charge-injection boundary condition). If any of these are adjusted to reproduce the measured velocity profiles, the numerical-experimental match is not predictive and the claimed insights into transport phenomena become circular. This directly affects the central claim that the multiphysics model yields new mechanistic understanding.
  2. [Numerical methods and experimental results] No information is provided on grid convergence, numerical discretization details, or experimental uncertainty (error bars, data exclusion criteria) for the hot-wire profiles. Without these, the quality and robustness of the reported agreement cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'The EHD phenomena has' is grammatically incorrect; should read 'The EHD phenomenon has'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to provide the requested details on model parameters and numerical/experimental methods.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model description and results sections] The abstract and model description do not state the provenance of the key model parameters (ion mobility, recombination rate, charge-injection boundary condition). If any of these are adjusted to reproduce the measured velocity profiles, the numerical-experimental match is not predictive and the claimed insights into transport phenomena become circular. This directly affects the central claim that the multiphysics model yields new mechanistic understanding.

    Authors: The ion mobility, recombination coefficients, and charge-injection boundary condition were taken directly from independent literature values and were not adjusted or fitted to the hot-wire velocity data. The revised manuscript adds an explicit subsection in the model description that states the provenance, numerical values, and citations for each parameter. This establishes that the numerical-experimental agreement is predictive and supports the claimed mechanistic insights. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical methods and experimental results] No information is provided on grid convergence, numerical discretization details, or experimental uncertainty (error bars, data exclusion criteria) for the hot-wire profiles. Without these, the quality and robustness of the reported agreement cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree these details are necessary. The revised manuscript adds a numerical methods subsection reporting the discretization scheme, grid convergence study (including mesh sizes and residual convergence), and a description of the experimental uncertainty analysis with error bars on the velocity profiles. Data exclusion criteria and processing steps for the constant-current hot-wire measurements are now stated in the experimental section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical model validated against independent hot-wire measurements; no reduction to fitted inputs or self-citation chains

full rationale

The paper reports experimental velocity profiles (max 1.7 m/s) obtained via constant-current hot-wire anemometry on a corona-actuator flat-plate setup. It then solves the coupled ion-transport + Navier-Stokes system and states that the computed fields match the measured data. No equations or text in the provided sections indicate that ion mobility, recombination coefficients, or charge-injection boundary conditions were adjusted to the present dataset; the match is therefore presented as an external validation rather than a self-consistent fit. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or derivation description. The central claim therefore rests on independent experimental benchmarks and remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted. The model presumably inherits standard assumptions from prior EHD literature (drift-diffusion for ions, incompressible Navier-Stokes) without new postulates stated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5743 in / 1030 out tokens · 21755 ms · 2026-05-25T16:35:11.395040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Enhancement of external forced convection by ionic wind,

    D. B. Go, R. A. Maturana, T. S. Fisher, and S. V. Garimella, "Enhancement of external forced convection by ionic wind," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 51, no. 25, pp. 6047 -6053, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.05.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.05.012 2008

  2. [2]

    Ionic winds for locally enhanced cooling,

    D. B. Go, S. V. Garimella, T. S. Fisher, and R. K. Mongia, "Ionic winds for locally enhanced cooling," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 102, no. 5, 2007, doi: 10.1063/1.2776164

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2776164 2007

  3. [3]

    Elec trostatic Fluid Accelerator and Air Purifier - the Second Wind,

    G. V. L. Krichtafovitch I. A. , Karpov S. V. , Mamishev A. V., "Elec trostatic Fluid Accelerator and Air Purifier - the Second Wind," presented at the Annual Meeting of the Electrostatics Society of America, Edmonton, Canada, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Optimization of Wire -Rod Elec trostatic Fluid Accelerators,

    T.-T. S. Tsrong -Yi Wen, Hsiu -Che Wang, Alexander Mamishev, "Optimization of Wire -Rod Elec trostatic Fluid Accelerators," presented at the 2013 IEEE 63rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, May, 28-31, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Particle Dynamics in Corona Induced Electro -hydrodynamic Flow,

    R. S. Vaddi, Y. Guan, and I. Novosselov, "Particle Dynamics in Corona Induced Electro -hydrodynamic Flow," arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.02986, 2019

    work page arXiv 1902

  6. [6]

    Electrohydrodynamic airflow control along a flat plate by a DC surface corona discharge - Velocity profile and wall pressure measurements,

    L. Léger, E. Moreau, and G. Touchard, "Electrohydrodynamic airflow control along a flat plate by a DC surface corona discharge - Velocity profile and wall pressure measurements," ed, 2002, p. <xocs:firstpage xmlns:xocs=""/>

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Electrohydrodynamic surface microvortices for mixing and particle trapping,

    L. Y. Yeo, D. Hou, S. Maheshswari, and H. -C. Chang, "Electrohydrodynamic surface microvortices for mixing and particle trapping," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 88, no. 23, p. 233512, 2006, doi: 10.1063/1.2212275

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2212275 2006

  8. [8]

    Two Relaxation Time Lattice Boltzmann Method Coupled to Fast Fourier Transform Poisson Solver: Application to Electroconvective Flow,

    Y. Guan and I. Novosselo v, "Two Relaxation Time Lattice Boltzmann Method Coupled to Fast Fourier Transform Poisson Solver: Application to Electroconvective Flow," arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05711, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Numerical Analysis of Electroconvection Phenomena in Cross-flow,

    Y. Guan and I. Novosselov, "Numerical Analysis of Electroconvection Phenomena in Cross-flow," arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.10899, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Analytical model of electro -hydrodynamic flow in corona discharge,

    Y. Guan, R. S. Vaddi, A. Aliseda, and I. Novosselov, "Analytical model of electro -hydrodynamic flow in corona discharge," Physics of Plasmas, vol. 25, no. 8, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5029403

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5029403 2018

  11. [11]

    J. S. Townsend, Electricity in gases . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1915

    work page 1915

  12. [12]

    The potentials requires to maintain currents between coaxial cylinders,

    J. S. Townsend, "The potentials requires to maintain currents between coaxial cylinders," The London, Edinburgh and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science, vol. 28, no. 163, p. 8, 1914

    work page 1914

  13. [13]

    Effect of an electrostatic field on boundary- layer transition,

    J. Ketcham and H. R. Velkoff, "Effect of an electrostatic field on boundary- layer transition," AIAA Journal, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1381-1383, 1968, doi: 10.2514/3.4756

    work page doi:10.2514/3.4756 1968

  14. [14]

    Ion wind drag reduction,

    M. Y. Hussaini, M. R. Malik, and L. M. Weinstein, "Ion wind drag reduction," ed, 1983

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    Micro -force measurement of drag on a small flat plate in the presence of a corona discharge,

    F. Soetomo, G. M. Colver, and K. Forouraghi, "Micro -force measurement of drag on a small flat plate in the presence of a corona discharge," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 525-530, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.elstat.2005.10.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2005.10.006 2006

  16. [16]

    Influence of a DC corona discharge on the airflow along an inclined flat plate,

    L. Léger, E. Moreau, G. Artana, and G. Touchard, "Influence of a DC corona discharge on the airflow along an inclined flat plate," Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 51, no. 1-4, pp. 300-306, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00089-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0304-3886(01)00089-4 2001

  17. [17]

    An interactive computer model for calculating V -I curves in ESPs. (1986). EPA, Particulate Technology Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    Three - dimensional ionic wind and electrohydrodynamics of tuft/point corona electrostatic precipitator,

    T. Yamamoto, M. Okuda, and M. Okubo, "Three - dimensional ionic wind and electrohydrodynamics of tuft/point corona electrostatic precipitator," vol. 2, ed, 2002, pp. 1397-1403

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Experimental and numerical investigation of electrohydrodynamic flow in a point -to-ring corona discharge,

    Y. Guan, R. S. Vaddi, A. Aliseda, and I. Novosselov, "Experimental and numerical investigation of electrohydrodynamic flow in a point -to-ring corona discharge," Physical Review Fluids, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 043701, 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    The law of corona and the dielectric strength of air,

    F. W. Peek, "The law of corona and the dielectric strength of air," presented at the the 28th Annual Convention of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Chicago, 1911

    work page 1911

  21. [21]

    Simple appro ximate treatment of unipolar space‐charge‐dominated coronas: The Warburg law and the saturation current,

    R. S. Sig mond, "Simple appro ximate treatment of unipolar space‐charge‐dominated coronas: The Warburg law and the saturation current," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 891-898, 1982, doi: 10.1063/1.330557

    work page doi:10.1063/1.330557 1982

  22. [22]

    The wall jet,

    M. Glauert, "The wall jet," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 625-643, 1956

    work page 1956

  23. [23]

    A similarity theory for the turbulent plane wall jet without external stream,

    W. K. George, H. Abrahamsson, J. Eriksson, R. I. Karlsson, L. Löfdahl, and M. Wosnik, "A similarity theory for the turbulent plane wall jet without external stream," Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 425, pp. 367-411, 2000

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Similarity of the Wall Jet Resulting from Planar Underexpanded Impinging Jets,

    P. Fillingham and I. Novosselov, "Similarity of the Wall Jet Resulting from Planar Underexpanded Impinging Jets," arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.11220, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018