pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00299 · v1 · pith:LVJZJZPRnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Synchrotron and free-free mapping with simulated REACH observations between 50-170 MHz

Daniel Robins , Dominic Anstey , Harry Bevins , Eloy de Lera Acedo , Melis O. Irfan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 01:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords synchrotron emissionfree-free emissionforeground separation21 cm signalradio sky mappinglow frequency observationscomponent separationGalactic emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fitting independent synchrotron and free-free components to low-frequency data enables component-separated radio sky maps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether joint fitting of a 21cm signal and multi-component foregrounds to simulated observations can recover accurate maps of the radio sky between 50 and 170 MHz. It finds that models must match the complexity of the underlying emission to avoid biasing the signal, yet added complexity creates degeneracies that restrict foreground parameter recovery. Synchrotron emission recovers well across the sky while free-free recovery remains limited. The approach therefore supports mapping applications that extend beyond the primary goal of detecting the cosmic hydrogen signal.

Core claim

Fitting a foreground with independent synchrotron and free-free emission enables component-separated sky mapping at 50-170 MHz. Synchrotron is well-recovered across the sky, but free-free recovery is limited. More complex foreground datasets require correspondingly complex models to recover the 21cm signal, yet these models introduce degeneracies that limit accurate recovery of foreground parameters.

What carries the argument

Joint fitting of signal and foreground spectral parameters to an existing sky map, using physically motivated foreground models that increase in complexity from a pure synchrotron power law to models including variable amplitudes, curvature, and a free-free component.

If this is right

  • More complex datasets require correspondingly complex models to recover the 21cm signal without bias.
  • Added model complexity introduces degeneracies that limit accurate recovery of foreground parameters.
  • Synchrotron emission is recovered well across the sky.
  • Free-free recovery remains limited.
  • The method supports probing Galactic physics at uniquely low frequencies in addition to 21cm detection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Component-separated maps at these frequencies could supply new constraints on the distribution of ionized gas in the Galaxy.
  • The same fitting approach might be adapted to other wide-band radio datasets to test consistency of emission models.
  • Limited free-free recovery suggests that additional frequency coverage or polarization data could be needed to break degeneracies.
  • The technique offers a route to absolutely calibrated maps that could serve as reference fields for higher-frequency surveys.

Load-bearing premise

Simulated observations accurately represent the true foreground emission so that recovery performance in simulations indicates real-world performance.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of recovered synchrotron and free-free maps against independent low-frequency measurements that show whether the separation remains accurate once real instrumental effects and unmodeled emission are present.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00299 by Daniel Robins, Dominic Anstey, Eloy de Lera Acedo, Harry Bevins, Melis O. Irfan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Region definition and Galactic latitude coverage. Left: sky map showing the 10 percentile-split regions. Right: distribution of Galactic latitudes covered by each region, showing how the percentile-based division naturally separates extreme-latitude regions from regions near the Galactic plane. In both panels, notable bright radio sources are labelled, including from Galactic and extragalactic sources (Gre… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of spectral index maps used for pixel-wise and region￾wise data generation. Top: continuous pixel-wise spectral indices from pixel￾by-pixel scaling between an instance of the GSM (de Oliveira-Costa et al. 2008) at 230 MHz and 408 MHz, used for pixel-wise parameter data (Anstey et al. 2021). Bottom: region-averaged spectral indices used for 𝑁reg = 10 region-wise parameter data, obtained by averag… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Input parameter maps at 125 MHz for all nine simulated datasets, including five pixel-wise datasets and four region-wise datasets. The top row shows 𝑇sky and the second row shows Δ𝑇sky relative to the power law baseline. Lower rows show the parameter maps used to generate each dataset: 𝛽sync, 𝐴sync, 𝛽ff, 𝐴ff, and 𝑐. For models with fixed parameters, constant-value maps are shown; blank cells denote paramet… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency spectra for all nine simulated observation datasets with 12-hour integration time. All datasets include injected Gaussian noise and the 21cm signal of equation (5). 𝜎noise = 0.025 √ 𝑁𝑡 K, (14) where 𝑁𝑡 = 721 is the number of time samples in the 12-hour LST integration, giving 𝜎noise ≃ 9.3 × 10−4 K, is added to each frequency channel. At each time sample 𝑡𝑘 (𝑘 = 1, . . . , 𝑁𝑡), the instantaneous b… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact of increasing the number of regions on model performance. Bayesian evidence and RMSE are shown as functions of 𝑁reg for all four models fitted to their corresponding region-wise parameter data, using traditional (synchrotron-informed) region-splitting. impact on both the recovered foreground and signal. The degeneracy structure is quantified further in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. 3.2.1 Parameter degen… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A comparison of how well different foreground models recover the 21cm signal from different types of pixel-wise observation data. Columns correspond to each of the four foreground models described in Section 2.1, and rows correspond to each of the pixel-wise observation data types outlined in Section 2.2. In each main panel, the true injected 21cm signal is shown as a white line with a black outline. The d… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A comparison of how well different foreground models recover the 21cm signal from different types of region-wise observation data. Columns correspond to each of the four foreground models described in Section 2.1, and rows correspond to each of the region-wise observation data types outlined in Section 2.2. In each main panel, the true injected 21cm signal is shown as a white line with a black outline. The… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Recovered-parameter summary for the four matching model / region-wise data combinations: power law fit on power law data (row 1), variable￾amplitude power law fit on variable-amplitude data (row 2), curvature fit on curved data (row 3), and sync + ff fit on sync + ff data (row 4). In each row, the top panel shows the fitted parameter sky map, the middle panel shows fitted (black) vs true (dark orange) regi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Parameter degeneracies for the three multi-parameter models, with all 10 regions plotted simultaneously (different colours/contours per region). Columns correspond to the variable amplitude power law (left), curved power law (centre), and sync + ff (right) models. The variable amplitude power law column shows one pair plot (𝐴 vs 𝛽); the curved power law column shows three pair plots (𝐴 vs 𝛽, 𝐴 vs 𝑐, and 𝛽 … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Region-by-region posterior degeneracy structure for key parameter pairs in the three multi-parameter models (variable-amplitude power law (left), curved power law (middle), and sync + ff (right), each fitted to their corresponding observation data type. Top row: Weighted Pearson correlation coefficient 𝜌𝑥𝑦 as a function of sky region. The error bars show the 1𝜎 uncertainty. Bottom row: Relative posterior … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Sky map reconstruction at 100 MHz for all four foreground models applied to pixel-wise observation data. Columns correspond to the four foreground models, and rows correspond to the five pixel-wise observation data types. For each model/data combination, the percentage residual, defined as (𝑇sky,fitted − 𝑇sky,true )/𝑇sky,true × 100% is shown. Under each map, the mean error across the whole sky is shown, u… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Sky map reconstruction at 100 MHz for all four foreground models applied to region-wise observation data. Columns correspond to the four foreground models, and rows correspond to the five region-wise observation data types. For each model/data combination, the percentage residual, defined as (𝑇sky,fitted − 𝑇sky,true )/𝑇sky,true × 100% is shown. Under each map, the mean error across the whole sky is shown,… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: True, evidence-weighted fitted, and percentage residual maps at 100 MHz for the sync + ff component separation, averaged across runs with 𝑁reg ∈ {2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12} using the Bayesian evidence weights defined by equation (30). This is the sync + ff fit applied to region-wise sync + ff data. Rows show free-free emission (top), synchrotron emission (middle), and total (synchrotron + free-free) emission (bo… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Input parameter maps for the mixed-split dataset. The synchrotron spectral index 𝛽sync (top left) and amplitude 𝐴sync (bottom left) are defined using the traditional synchrotron-informed partition, while the free-free spec￾tral index (top right) and amplitude 𝐴ff (bottom right) are defined on the FF-informed partition. In both cases, 𝑁reg = 10. of the existing datasets, but this demonstration is designed … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of recovery performance for the 𝑁reg = 10 12-hour integrated mixed-split dataset, using the sync + ff foreground model, across three region-partition strategies: traditional splitting (left), FF-informed splitting (centre), and mixed splitting (right). Top row: fitted versus true region-averaged foreground sky temperatures, coloured by region index, with the dashed one-to-one line; pixel foregr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Global 21cm experiments aim to detect the hydrogen 21cm signal by separating it from foreground emission that can be orders of magnitude brighter than the signal. REACH (the Radio Experiment for the Analysis of Cosmic Hydrogen) forward-models the sky by jointly fitting signal and foreground spectral parameters to an existing sky map. The fitted parameters yield spectrally constrained, absolutely calibrated maps of the radio sky across the full 50-170 MHz observing band, among the lowest continuous frequencies yet mapped. We assess REACH's ability to fit the 21cm signal and recover accurate foreground maps, using physically motivated foreground models of increasing complexity (starting from a pure synchrotron power law model, then introducing variable amplitudes, curvature, and a free-free component). We evaluate these models against simulated REACH observations of correspondingly complex foregrounds, based on the Global Sky Model and the Python Sky Model. To recover the 21cm signal, more complex datasets require correspondingly complex models, but this introduces degeneracies which limit accurate recovery of foreground parameters. Fitting a foreground with independent synchrotron and free-free emission enables component-separated sky mapping, which has applications beyond radio cosmology; synchrotron is well-recovered across the sky, but free-free recovery is limited. REACH is therefore capable of probing Galactic physics at uniquely low frequencies, alongside its primary goal of detecting the 21cm signal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a simulation-based assessment of the REACH experiment's forward-modeling approach for jointly recovering the 21cm signal and producing absolutely calibrated, component-separated maps of synchrotron and free-free emission over 50-170 MHz. Using foreground models of increasing complexity (power-law synchrotron, then with variable amplitude/curvature, then adding free-free) fit to simulated observations generated from the Global Sky Model (GSM) and Python Sky Model (PSM), it finds that more complex data require correspondingly complex models but introduce degeneracies; independent synchrotron + free-free fitting enables component separation, with synchrotron well recovered across the sky while free-free recovery is limited.

Significance. If the simulation results hold under realistic conditions, the demonstration that independent synchrotron and free-free fitting yields component-separated maps (with robust synchrotron recovery) provides a concrete path to low-frequency Galactic astrophysics applications alongside the primary 21cm goal. The use of independent external sky models (GSM/PSM) as truth for recovery testing is a strength that avoids circularity in the performance metrics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, discussion] Abstract and discussion: The central claim that the approach 'enables component-separated sky mapping, which has applications beyond radio cosmology' and that 'REACH is therefore capable of probing Galactic physics' is load-bearing on the assumption that GSM and PSM accurately represent true foreground spectral/spatial structure at 50-170 MHz. No quantitative validation against independent low-frequency observations (e.g., from other experiments) is provided to bound the model mismatch, which directly limits the strength of the real-world extension.
  2. [Results section on increasing model complexity] Results on model complexity: While the text states that 'more complex datasets require correspondingly complex models but this introduces degeneracies which limit accurate recovery of foreground parameters,' no explicit quantification (e.g., parameter covariance matrices or degeneracy metrics between free-free amplitude and synchrotron curvature) is shown to support the differential recovery performance between synchrotron and free-free.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Title, abstract] The title and abstract could more explicitly note that all results are simulation-based rather than on real REACH data to avoid potential misreading of the scope.
  2. [Methods on foreground models] Notation for the free-free amplitude parameter should be defined consistently when first introduced in the model descriptions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and support for the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, discussion] Abstract and discussion: The central claim that the approach 'enables component-separated sky mapping, which has applications beyond radio cosmology' and that 'REACH is therefore capable of probing Galactic physics' is load-bearing on the assumption that GSM and PSM accurately represent true foreground spectral/spatial structure at 50-170 MHz. No quantitative validation against independent low-frequency observations (e.g., from other experiments) is provided to bound the model mismatch, which directly limits the strength of the real-world extension.

    Authors: We agree that the extension of our results to real-world Galactic physics applications assumes the fidelity of the GSM and PSM models at 50-170 MHz. The manuscript presents a controlled simulation study that tests recovery performance when the input foregrounds are drawn from these models. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract and discussion sections to explicitly state that the demonstrated component separation holds under the simulated conditions based on GSM/PSM, and that quantitative validation against independent low-frequency observations would be needed to support definitive astrophysical inferences. This revision will clarify the scope of the claims without altering the core simulation results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section on increasing model complexity] Results on model complexity: While the text states that 'more complex datasets require correspondingly complex models but this introduces degeneracies which limit accurate recovery of foreground parameters,' no explicit quantification (e.g., parameter covariance matrices or degeneracy metrics between free-free amplitude and synchrotron curvature) is shown to support the differential recovery performance between synchrotron and free-free.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit quantification of the reported degeneracies would strengthen the results section. In the revised manuscript we will include the parameter covariance matrices obtained from the fits (or derived correlation coefficients) and add degeneracy metrics specifically between free-free amplitude and synchrotron curvature to quantitatively illustrate the differential recovery performance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; recovery tested against independent external simulation truth.

full rationale

The paper performs a standard simulation-based recovery test: observations are generated from independent external sky models (GSM, PSM), then fitted with parametric models of increasing complexity. Performance metrics (synchrotron recovery across sky, limited free-free recovery) are obtained by direct comparison to the known simulation inputs, not by construction from the fitted parameters. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input-as-prediction steps, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The central claim about component-separated mapping is validated externally rather than assumed.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The assessment depends on the accuracy of external sky models and the appropriateness of the parametric forms chosen for fitting, which are standard but introduce several free parameters that must be constrained by the data.

free parameters (3)
  • synchrotron spectral index
    Fitted parameter in the power-law model for synchrotron emission
  • curvature parameter
    Additional parameter for spectral curvature in more complex models
  • free-free amplitude
    Amplitude of the free-free emission component
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Foreground emission consists of synchrotron and free-free components with known spectral dependencies
    Invoked when introducing the component separation model
  • domain assumption The Global Sky Model and Python Sky Model provide accurate representations of the radio sky for simulation purposes
    Basis for generating the simulated observations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5793 in / 1450 out tokens · 50532 ms · 2026-07-02T01:07:45.738969+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nature Astronomy , year =

  2. [2]

    Bowman, J. D. and Rogers, A. E. E. and Monsalve, R. A. and Mozdzen, T. J. and Mahesh, N. , title =. Nature , year =

  3. [3]

    and others , title =

    Singh, S. and others , title =. ApJ , year =

  4. [4]

    and others , title =

    Paciga, G. and others , title =. MNRAS , year =

  5. [5]

    Pritchard, J. R. and Loeb, A. , title =. Reports on Progress in Physics , year =

  6. [6]

    Furlanetto, S. R. and Oh, S. P. and Briggs, F. H. , title =. Physics Reports , year =

  7. [7]

    and Shaw, J

    Liu, A. and Shaw, J. R. , title =. PASP , year =

  8. [8]

    Santos, M. G. and Cooray, A. and Knox, L. , title =. ApJ , year =

  9. [9]

    Harker, G. J. A. and others , title =. MNRAS , year =

  10. [10]

    and de Bruyn, A

    Bernardi, G. and de Bruyn, A. G. and Brentjens, M. A. and others , title =. A&A , year =

  11. [11]

    and Shankar, N

    Vedantham, H. and Shankar, N. U. and Subrahmanyan, R. , title =. ApJ , year =

  12. [12]

    and others , title =

    Kogut, A. and others , title =. ApJ , year =

  13. [13]

    and Burigana, C

    Platania, P. and Burigana, C. and Maino, D. and others , title =. A&A , year =

  14. [14]

    and Davies, R

    Dickinson, C. and Davies, R. D. and Davis, R. J. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  15. [15]

    and Tegmark, M

    de Oliveira-Costa, A. and Tegmark, M. and Gaensler, B. M. and Jonas, J. and Landecker, T. L. and Reich, P. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  16. [16]

    and Dickinson, C

    Remazeilles, M. and Dickinson, C. and Banday, A. J. and Bigot-Sazy, M.-A. and Ghosh, T. , title =. MNRAS , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1274 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1274

  17. [17]

    Irfan, M. O. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  18. [18]

    and Anderson, C

    Hutschenreuter, S. and Anderson, C. S. and Betti, S. and Bower, G. C. and Brown, J.-A. and others , title =. A&A , year =

  19. [19]

    and Dunkley, J

    Thorne, B. and Dunkley, J. and Alonso, D. and N. MNRAS , year =

  20. [20]

    and Delabrouille, J

    Th\'ebault, C. and Delabrouille, J. and Cardoso, J.-F. , title =. A&A , year =

  21. [21]

    and others , title =

    Zheng, H. and others , title =. MNRAS , year =

  22. [22]

    and Subrahmanyan, R

    Sathyanarayana Rao, M. and Subrahmanyan, R. and Udaya Shankar, N. and Chluba, J. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  23. [23]

    Handley, W. J. and Hobson, M. P. and Lasenby, A. N. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  24. [24]

    Handley, W. J. and Hobson, M. P. and Lasenby, A. N. , title =. MNRAS Letters , year =

  25. [25]

    , title =

    Skilling, J. , title =. Bayesian Analysis , year =

  26. [26]

    , title =

    Trotta, R. , title =. Contemporary Physics , year =

  27. [27]

    Liddle, A. R. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  28. [28]

    Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. , title =. 2002 , edition =

    2002

  29. [29]

    , title =

    Schwarz, G. , title =. The Annals of Statistics , year =

  30. [30]

    MNRAS , volume=

    A general Bayesian framework to account for foreground map errors in global 21-cm experiments , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  31. [31]

    Monsalve, R. A. and Rogers, A. E. E. and Bowman, J. D. and Mozdzen, T. J. , title =. ApJ , year =

  32. [32]

    and de Lera Acedo, E

    Anstey, D. and de Lera Acedo, E. and Handley, W. J. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  33. [33]

    Bevins, H. T. J. and Handley, W. J. and Fialkov, A. and de Lera Acedo, E. and Greenhill, L. J. and Price, D. C. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  34. [34]

    Bevins, H. T. J. and de Lera Acedo, E. and Fialkov, A. and Handley, W. J. and Singh, S. and Subrahmanyan, R. and Barkana, R. , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =

  35. [35]

    Haslam, C. G. T. and Salter, C. J. and Stoffel, H. and Wilson, W. E. , title =. A&AS , year =

  36. [36]

    I , author=

    A radio continuum survey of the northern sky at 1420 MHz. I , author=. A&AS , volume=

  37. [37]

    Rybicki, G. B. and Lightman, A. P. , title =

  38. [38]

    Draine, B. T. , title =

  39. [39]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Measurements of the diffuse Galactic synchrotron spectral index and curvature from MeerKLASS pilot data , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  40. [40]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Measuring the diffuse Galactic synchrotron spectral index and curvature between 45 and 2300 MHz , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  41. [41]

    Asad, K. M. B. and Koopmans, L. V. E. and Jeli\'c, V. and others , title =. MNRAS , year =

  42. [42]

    Pober, J. C. and Liu, A. and Dillon, J. S. and others , title =. ApJ , year =

  43. [43]

    Harris, C. R. and others , title =. Nature , year =

  44. [44]

    and others , title =

    Virtanen, P. and others , title =. Nature Methods , year =

  45. [45]

    Hunter, J. D. , title =. Computing in Science & Engineering , year =

  46. [46]

    and others , title =

    Chapman, E. and others , title =. MNRAS , year =

  47. [47]

    Mertens, F. G. and Ghosh, A. and Koopmans, L. V. E. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  48. [48]

    Switzer, E. R. and Liu, A. , title =. ApJ , year =

  49. [49]

    Monsalve, R. A. and others , title =. ApJ , year =

  50. [50]

    Sims, P. H. and Pober, J. C. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  51. [51]

    and Ochsenbein, F

    Wenger, M. and Ochsenbein, F. and Egret, D. and Dubois, P. and Bonnarel, F. and Borde, S. and Genova, F. and Jasniewicz, G. and Lalo. A&AS , year =

  52. [52]

    An updated catalogue of 310 Galactic supernova remnants and their statistical properties , author=. J. Astrophys. Astr. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [53]

    and Madore, B

    Helou, G. and Madore, B. F. and Schmitz, M. and Bicay, M. D. and Wu, X. and Bennett, J. , title =. Databases and On-line Data in Astronomy , year =

  54. [54]

    Databases & On-Line Data in Astronomy , pages=

    The NASA/IPAC extragalactic database , author=. Databases & On-Line Data in Astronomy , pages=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  55. [55]

    Garrett , title =

    John D. Garrett , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4106649 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4106649

  56. [56]

    Condon, J. J. and Ransom, S. M. , title =. 2016 , address =

    2016

  57. [57]

    and Han, J

    Xu, Y. and Han, J. L. and Han, J. , title =. , year =

  58. [58]

    ApJ , volume=

    Fitting and comparing galactic foreground models for unbiased 21 cm cosmology , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  59. [59]

    Landecker, T. L. and Wielebinski, R. , title =. Aust. J. Phys. Astrophys. Suppl. , year =

  60. [60]

    and Dickinson, C

    Remazeilles, M. and Dickinson, C. and Banday, A. J. and Bigot-Sazy, M.-A. and Ghosh, T. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  61. [61]

    A&A , volume=

    All-sky Galactic radiation at 45 MHz and spectral index between 45 and 408 MHz , author=. A&A , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  62. [62]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Informing antenna design for sky-averaged 21-cm experiments using a simulated Bayesian data analysis pipeline , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  63. [63]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Bayesian evidence for flux scale errors in Galactic synchrotron maps , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  64. [64]

    Nature Astronomy , pages=

    Precise measurement of the absolute sky brightness at 60--350 MHz , author=. Nature Astronomy , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  65. [65]

    Understanding the Epoch of Cosmic Reionization: Challenges and Progress , volume=

    The 21-cm Line as a Probe of Reionization , author=. Understanding the Epoch of Cosmic Reionization: Challenges and Progress , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  66. [66]

    Davies, R. D. and Wilkinson, A. , title =. preprint (arXiv:astro-ph/9804208) , year =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Morales, M. F. and Wyithe, J. S. B. , title =. ARA&A , year =

  68. [68]

    Udaya and Girish, B

    Singh, Saurabh and Nambissan T., Jishnu and Subrahmanyan, Ravi and Shankar, N. Udaya and Girish, B. S. and Raghunathan, A. and Somashekar, R. and Srivani, K. S. and Rao, Mayuri Sathyanarayana , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01619-8 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01619-8

  69. [69]

    MNRAS , year =

    Anstey, Dominic and de Lera Acedo, Eloy and Handley, Will , title =. MNRAS , year =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad156 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad156

  70. [70]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526803 , eprint =

    A&A , year =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526803 , eprint =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526803

  71. [71]

    Can the reionization epoch be detected as a global signature in the cosmic background?

    Can the reionization epoch be detected as a global signature in the cosmic background?. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9901320 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9901320 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9901320

  72. [72]

    A&A , volume=

    Spectral index of synchrotron emission: insights from the diffuse and magnetised interstellar medium , author=. A&A , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  73. [73]

    2019 , publisher=

    The Cosmic 21-cm Revolution , author=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  74. [74]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Distinctive 21-cm structures of the first stars, galaxies and quasars , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  75. [75]

    , title =

    Mirocha, Jordan and Furlanetto, Steven R. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  76. [76]

    MNRAS , year =

    Gessey-Jones, Thomas and others , title =. MNRAS , year =

  77. [77]

    and Sun, Guochao , title =

    Mirocha, Jordan and Furlanetto, Steven R. and Sun, Guochao , title =. MNRAS , year =

  78. [78]

    and Mirocha, Jordan and Furlanetto, Steven R

    Mebane, Richard H. and Mirocha, Jordan and Furlanetto, Steven R. , title =. MNRAS , year =

  79. [79]

    Nature , year =

    Barkana, Rennan , title =. Nature , year =

  80. [80]

    Nature , year =

    Fialkov, Anastasia and Barkana, Rennan and Visbal, Eli , title =. Nature , year =

Showing first 80 references.