Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 117 references

Quantum selection of order and dynamic properties of Kitaev-Heisenberg ferromagnet on a triangular lattice

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum fluctuations select the magnetization direction in a triangular-lattice ferromagnetic Kitaev-Heisenberg model, stabilizing a canted phase and gapping the magnon spectrum.

desk verdict Quantum order-by-disorder in the triangular Kitaev-Heisenberg ferromagnet is likely real; the Δ≠1 phase diagram rests on an upper-bound energy comparison that needs more support. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05204 v2 pith:LWCXQ74G submitted 2025-05-08 cond-mat.str-el

Kaushal K. Kesharpu , Pavel A. Maksimov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 75.10.Jm75.30.Ds75.40.Gb
keywords orderbydisorderKitaev-Heisenbergmodeltriangularlatticespin-wavetheorymagnondecayXXZanisotropyferromagnetdynamicalstructurefactor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that in the ferromagnetic regime of the anisotropic-exchange (extended Kitaev-Heisenberg) model on a triangular lattice, the bond-dependent exchange terms are invisible to the classical energy yet control the quantum ground state: zero-point fluctuations select the magnetization direction, stabilize a canted FM-yz phase over a wide range of XXZ anisotropy, and generate magnon interactions that open a gap and cause spontaneous decay. The authors extend minimally-augmented spin-wave theory to classically unstable ferromagnetic states, benchmark the predicted canting angle against DMRG, and compute the dynamical structure factor with 1/S corrections. The results give concrete neutron-scattering signatures for triangular-lattice ferromagnets with sizable spin-orbit coupling, such as NaRuO2.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin-wave expansion of the model around a reference direction (θ, φ), built from the Holstein-Primakoff transformation and organized into quadratic, cubic, and quartic terms. Classically unstable states are handled with the minimally-augmented spin-wave theory (MAGSWT) stabilizing field μ = |B_{k=0}| − A_{k=0}, which makes the quadratic spectrum positive; the canted FM-yz state, which is not a classical extremum, is converted into a saddle point by requiring the Hartree-Fock-renormalized one-magnon vertex V_HF^(1) to vanish (Eq. 27), and that condition fixes its canting angle θ*. The zero-point energy δE^(2) from the diagonalized quadratic Hamiltonian then serves as the quantum order-by-disorder selection functional, while the cubic and quartic vertices feed the 1/S self-energy and the dynamical structure factor.

What would settle it

A large-scale tensor-network computation of ground-state energies for the FM-x, FM-z, and FM-yz states at parameters such as Δ=0.8, J±±=0.2|J|, Jz±=0.6|J| would settle whether the FM-yz state is truly the ground state, and a neutron-scattering experiment on a candidate material such as NaRuO2 that finds no magnon gap at the Γ point would contradict the predicted gap opening from bond-dependent interactions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the bond-dependent terms J±± and Jz±, which cancel exactly in the classical energy because the sums of their bond phase factors vanish, are the decisive physics once quantum fluctuations are included. For isotropic XXZ exchange (Δ=1), zero-point energy minimization selects the in-plane azimuthal angle φ=π/6+πn/3 and yields two competing states: an out-of-plane FM-z state favored by J±± (understood through virtual double spin-flip processes) and a canted FM-yz state favored by Jz±. For Δ≠1, the paper argues by continuity and demonstrates by calculation that the canted state survives in a wide window of anisotropy: quantum corrections create a new metastable minimum at a canting angle θ* fixed by the condition that the Hartree-Fock-renormalized one-magnon vertex vanish, after which its energy can be evaluated with well-defined spin-wave theory. Non-linear spin-wave theory then shows that the same bond-dependent terms renormalize the magnon spectrum: the accidental gaplessness is replaced by a gap at the Γ point, and near the Brillouin-zone boundary the one-magnon mode acquires a decay rate from coupling to the two-magnon continuum.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison of energies for classically unstable states assumes that the MAGSWT upper-bound energies are not biased toward any particular spin direction; in particular, the canted FM-yz state is evaluated at the angle where a Hartree-Fock condition is satisfied rather than at a classical extremum, so any state-dependent bias in the stabilizing-field procedure would move the Δ≠1 phase boundaries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A finite Jz± stabilizes the canted FM-yz state over a wide range of XXZ anisotropy, including the easy-plane side, where a naive single-ion picture would predict purely in-plane magnetization.
  • The FM-z (out-of-plane) state survives even in the easy-plane regime, showing that quantum fluctuations can override the classical easy-plane preference for sufficiently large J±±.
  • The magnon spectrum of the ferromagnetic state is gapped at the Γ point once 1/S corrections are included, and magnon decay broadens the spectrum near the Brillouin-zone boundary, so anisotropic-exchange ferromagnets should show these features at low temperature.
  • The spin-wave prediction for the canting angle θ*(Δ) agrees with DMRG, strengthening the quantitative status of the computed phase diagram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism—bond-dependent terms that cancel in classical energy but couple to quantum fluctuations—should operate on other tricoordinated lattices with edge-sharing octahedra, so the FM-z versus canted state competition may serve as a diagnostic of the J±±/Jz± ratio in future candidate materials.
  • Because the gap at Γ is an order-by-disorder effect, it should also manifest in thermodynamic quantities (e.g., a low-temperature suppression of the uniform susceptibility), offering a complement to neutron scattering.
  • The Hartree-Fock stabilization criterion (Eq. 27) could be reused as a practical recipe for computing quantum-corrected energies of other classically unstable or non-extremal magnetic states, potentially extending MAGSWT beyond ferromagnetic order.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the ferromagnetic regime of an anisotropic-exchange (extended Kitaev-Heisenberg) model on a triangular lattice, with bond-dependent terms J±± and J_z± in addition to an XXZ Heisenberg exchange. The authors show that the bond-dependent terms do not enter the classical energy, so the classical ferromagnet has an accidental degeneracy in spin direction. They then compute quantum corrections within linear spin-wave theory and, for the isotropic XXZ point Δ=1, obtain a phase diagram with two selected states: a canted FM-yz state and an Ising-like FM-z state. For Δ≠1, they extend minimally-augmented spin-wave theory (MAGSWT) by stabilizing classically unstable states with a positive field and by defining the FM-yz state through a Hartree-Fock condition that removes the linear magnon term. The resulting phase diagram shows a wide region of FM-yz stability for both easy-plane and easy-axis anisotropy. In the second half of the paper, they derive 1/S corrections to the magnon self-energy, including three- and four-magnon interactions, and compute the dynamical structure factor for FM-z and FM-yz states, finding a quantum-induced gap and spontaneous magnon decay near zone boundaries. The DMRG calculation validates the canting angle of the FM-yz state for one representative parameter set.

Significance. If the main phase-diagram result is correct, this is a significant contribution to the order-by-disorder literature for bond-dependent triangular-lattice ferromagnets. The manuscript provides unusually detailed closed-form expressions for the linear and non-linear spin-wave theory in Appendices B1–B5, including a disclosed typo correction to a prior reference. The prediction that finite J_z± stabilizes a canted FM-yz state over a wide range of XXZ anisotropy is concrete and falsifiable, and the dynamical structure factor results are of direct relevance to neutron scattering on candidate materials such as NaRuO2. However, the load-bearing Δ≠1 phase diagram rests on a methodological extension whose validity is not fully demonstrated, so the significance is conditional on that point being resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eqs. (17)–(19), Fig. 5] The Δ≠1 phase diagram is constructed by adding a positive stabilizing field μ to classically unstable states. Because μ is state-dependent and the resulting δE^(2) is an upper bound, comparing E_cl + δE^(2) across states does not by itself establish the physical energy ordering. The paper does not quantify how this upper-bound bias affects the phase boundaries; a state with a larger classical instability pays a larger stabilization penalty and may be artificially disfavored. I would like to see either an argument that the bias is equal to leading order across the candidate states, or an independent check of the energy ordering (for example, DMRG energies) for at least the boundaries shown in Fig. 5.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (27)] The claimed equivalence between the Hartree-Fock condition V^(1)_HF = 0 and minimization of E_cl + δE^(2) is not derived. For the FM-yz state the linear term in Eq. (20) is nonzero, so the harmonic expansion is not defined about a classical extremum. The renormalized one-boson vertex in Eq. (26) is obtained by decoupling three-magnon terms, while δE^(2) is computed from the μ-stabilized quadratic spectrum; these two constructions need not share the same stationary point. The manuscript should show this equivalence explicitly, or otherwise justify that the θ* obtained from Eq. (27) is the appropriate energy minimum for the state.
  3. [Fig. 4(b) and Fig. 5] The DMRG comparison is limited to the canting angle θ* for one parameter set (J±± = 0.2|J|, J_z± = 0.6|J|) and does not test the energy ordering that determines Fig. 5. The central claim that FM-yz is stable over a wide range of Δ would be materially strengthened by direct DMRG ground-state energies of the competing FM-x, FM-y, FM-z, and FM-yz states at representative points in the Δ≠1 phase diagram. Without such a check, the wide FM-yz stability regions remain a prediction of the augmented spin-wave procedure rather than a fully validated result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (14)] The displayed expression for the second-order perturbation appears to be missing parentheses around the sum over α=1,...,6; please clarify the grouping of the terms.
  2. [Figures 1 and 5] The color scale for the FM-yz canting angle and the identification of the phase boundaries are not described in the captions; adding explicit labels or a color-bar description would improve readability.
  3. [Appendix B1, Eqs. (B1)–(B3)] The notation for the lattice sums 𝛾_F,k, e𝛾_F,k, and ˆ𝛾_F,k is easy to confuse; please define all of them in one place and use consistent hat/tilde notation throughout.
  4. [Section IV, Eq. (39)] The on-shell self-energy correction is presented for a few parameter sets; it would be helpful to state explicitly whether the spectra shown in Figs. 7–9 are for parameter sets that are stable ground states according to Fig. 5, since the phase diagram itself is the subject of the methodological concern above.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: quantum order-by-disorder selection is derived from the model Hamiltonian and benchmarked against DMRG.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that bond-dependent exchanges, which cancel in the classical energy, select spin direction through quantum zero-point fluctuations. This is not an input-output tautology: A_k and B_k (Eqs. B1–B2) are explicit functions of θ and φ computed from the Hamiltonian (1), and δE^(2)=½Σ(ε_k−A_k) is minimized over directions. The MAGSWT stabilization (17) and the Hartree-Fock condition (27) determine a self-consistent saddle-point angle θ* for a classically non-extremal state; the asserted equivalence of (27) with minimization of E_cl+δE^(2) is a stationary-condition statement of the same variational calculation, not a separate prediction that is then used to define the energy. Comparing the resulting state energies in Fig. 5 is an honest (if approximate) many-state comparison. The DMRG check (Fig. 4b) validates the canting angle for a parameter sweep but not the full energy ordering; that is a benchmark limitation, not circularity. Self-citations to Refs. [54], [99], and [109] provide standard spin-wave vertices and are either rederived in Appendix B or used as method analogy; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported, and the paper even flags a typo in [54]. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the new FM-yz/FM-z selection content is not just a renaming of a known result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the exchange constants J, Δ, J±±, and J_z± are Hamiltonian inputs from the prior literature. The stabilizing field μ is determined by Eq. (19) rather than free. The main assumptions are the semiclassical 1/S expansion, the ideal bond geometry, the MAGSWT upper-bound procedure, Hartree-Fock decoupling, and finite-cluster DMRG.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Holstein-Primakoff 1/S expansion is valid and converges at S=1/2.
    The central quantitative tool; Eq. (3) expands spins as bosons and all energies and spectra are computed in powers of 1/S, which is not controlled at S=1/2.
  • domain assumption The ideal triangular lattice has exactly 120-degree bond angles so that bond-dependent classical energies sum to zero.
    Sec. II uses the vanishing sums of cos φ_α and sin φ_α over the three bonds; real materials with distortions would have residual classical bond-dependent energy.
  • domain assumption MAGSWT with the minimal stabilizing field μ gives unbiased upper-bound energies for classically unstable states.
    Eqs. (17)-(19) add a positive chemical potential to make spectra real; the paper assumes the minimum μ at k=0 and the upper-bound nature do not bias relative phase stability.
  • domain assumption Hartree-Fock decoupling of three-magnon terms captures the leading quantum correction that legitimizes the FM-yz harmonic expansion.
    Eqs. (23)-(27) define a renormalized one-boson vertex and the paper uses its zero to select θ* and compute the energy of the FM-yz state.
  • domain assumption DMRG on a 100-site cylinder with m=400 states approximates the thermodynamic limit.
    Used in Fig. 4(b); finite size and bond dimension may not capture all quantum fluctuations, as the paper itself notes the absence of fully saturated FM-z in DMRG.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum selection of order and dynamic properties of Kitaev-Heisenberg ferromagnet on a triangular lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LWCXQ74G

@misc{pith2026250505204,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum selection of order and dynamic properties of Kitaev-Heisenberg ferromagnet on a triangular lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LWCXQ74G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05204}
}
read the original abstract

Recent interest in monolayer materials motivated a search for two-dimensional ferromagnets with sizable spin-orbit coupling. Magnetic anisotropy of exchange Hamiltonian, induced by spin-orbit coupling, may not only stabilize long-range order, but also in turn can be a source of frustration and accidental degeneracy, which is the case for the Kitaev-Heisenberg model. Here we present an extensive study of ground state and excitations of ferromagnetic anisotropic-exchange Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a triangular lattice using order-by-disorder and augmented spin-wave theory calculations. It is shown that while bond-dependent terms of the model do not affect the ground state classically, quantum fluctuations select preferred magnetization direction of the ferromagnetic state and significantly alter classical phase diagram. Anisotropic terms of the magnetic Hamiltonian also give rise to magnon-magnon interactions that lead to spontaneous decay and spectral renormalization, which we illustrate using non-linear spin-wave theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05204 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic spin-wave theory (SWT) phase diagram of the fer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Triangular lattice with edge-sharing ligand octahedra and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Zero-point energy for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Classical energy and energy with quantum fluctuations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spin-wave theory phase diagram for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Decay and source diagrams for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) First Brillouin zone and one-dimensional contour used in (b) and Figs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Magnetic spectrum of the FM-z state for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Magnetic spectrum of the FM-yz state for various [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [54]

    P. A. Maksimov, Z. Zhu, S. R. White, and A. L. Chernyshev, Anisotropic-Exchange Magnets on a Triangular Lattice: Spin Waves, Accidental Degeneracies, and Dual Spin Liquids, Phys. Rev. X9, 021017 (2019)

    2019

  2. [1]

    Linear spin-wave theory Holstein-Primakofftransformation (3)oftheHamiltonian (1) with terms up to quadratic order yields expression(6), whose elements are given by 𝐴k=− 6𝐽𝑆 cos2𝜃+Δ sin2𝜃 + 3𝐽𝑆𝛾 k 1+ sin2𝜃+Δ cos2𝜃 − 6𝐽±±𝑆 cos2𝜃𝛾𝐹, k− 3𝐽𝑧±𝑆 sin 2𝜃𝛾𝐹, k, (B1) 𝐵k= 3𝐽𝑆(1−Δ) cos2𝜃𝛾 k− 6𝐽±±𝑆 1+ sin2𝜃 𝛾𝐹, k + 3𝐽𝑧±𝑆 sin 2𝜃𝛾𝐹, k+ 6𝑖𝑆 2𝐽±± sin𝜃 e𝛾𝐹, k+𝐽𝑧± cos𝜃 ˆ𝛾𝐹, ...

  3. [2]

    (B9) 9 FIG

    Corrections to one-magnon term Hartree-Fock decoupling of three-magnon interaction (23) 𝑎† 𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑎𝑖→ 2𝑛𝑎𝑖+𝛿𝑎† 𝑖 𝑎𝑖𝑎† 𝑗𝑎𝑗→𝑚𝛼𝑎𝑗+𝑛𝑎𝑖+Δ𝛼𝑎† 𝑗 𝑎𝑗𝑎† 𝑖𝑎𝑖→𝑚𝛼𝑎𝑖+𝑛𝑎𝑗+Δ𝛼𝑎† 𝑖 (B4) yields quantum corrections to the one magnon term in the Holstein-Primakoff expansion: H(3) HF = ∑︁ ⟨𝑖𝑗⟩𝛼 𝑎𝑖+𝑎𝑗 𝑉(3) 𝛼 3𝑛 2 +𝑚𝛼 +𝛿∗𝑉(3)∗ 𝛼 4 +Δ∗ 𝛼𝑉(3)∗ 𝛼 # +H.c., (B5) where the Hartree-Fock av...

  4. [3]

    Three-magnon interaction Interaction vertices of three-magnon terms in Eqs.(31) and (30) are given by Φqkp=𝐹qkp𝑢q𝑢k𝑢p+𝐹kqp𝑢q𝑢k𝑢p +𝐹qpk𝑢q𝑣k𝑣p+𝐹kpq𝑣q𝑢k𝑣p +𝐹pkq𝑣q𝑢k𝑣p+𝐹pqk𝑢q𝑣k𝑣p +𝐹∗ pkq𝑢q𝑣k𝑢p+𝐹∗ pqk𝑣q𝑢k𝑢p +𝐹∗ qpk𝑣q𝑢k𝑢p+𝐹∗ kpq𝑢q𝑣k𝑢p +𝐹∗ qkp𝑣q𝑣k𝑣p+𝐹∗ kqp𝑣q𝑣k𝑣p, (B10) Ξqkp=𝐹qkp𝑣q𝑣k𝑢p+𝐹kqp𝑣q𝑣k𝑢p +𝐹qpk𝑣q𝑢k𝑣p+𝐹kpq𝑢q𝑣k𝑣p +𝐹pqk𝑣q𝑢k𝑣p+𝐹pkq𝑢q𝑣k𝑣p +𝐹∗ qkp𝑢q𝑢k𝑣p+𝐹∗ qpk𝑢...

  5. [4]

    Four-magnon interaction Hartree-Fock decoupling of four-magnon interaction yields corrections to the magnon spectrum 𝛿H(4) 2 = ∑︁ k h 𝛿𝐴(4) k 𝑎† k𝑎k− 1 2 𝛿𝐵(4) k 𝑎† k𝑎† −k+ H.c. i , (B13) where coefficients are given by 𝛿𝐴(4) k = 3∑︁ 𝛼=1 𝐽𝑥𝑥 −(𝑚𝛼+ReΔ𝛼)− 1 2(2𝑛+Re𝛿) cos k𝛿𝛼 +𝐽𝑦𝑦 (ReΔ𝛼−𝑚𝛼)+ 1 2(Re𝛿− 2𝑛) cos k𝛿𝛼 +𝐽𝑧𝑧[2𝑛+ 2𝑚𝛼 cos k𝛿𝛼]+𝐽𝑥𝑦[−2ImΔ𝛼−Im𝛿 cos k𝛿𝛼],...

  6. [5]

    Dynamical structure factor intensity Rotating to the local reference frame and summing over𝛼 and𝛽 in Eq. (36) yields (for𝑘𝑧 = 0) S( k,𝜔)= 𝑘 2 𝑦 𝑘 2𝑆𝑥0𝑥0 k,𝜔 + 𝑘 2 𝑥 𝑘 2𝑆𝑦0𝑦0 k,𝜔 − 𝑘𝑥𝑘𝑦 𝑘 2 𝑆𝑥0𝑦0 k,𝜔 +𝑆𝑦0𝑥0 k,𝜔 +𝑆𝑧0𝑧0 k,𝜔, (B21) where components of dynamical structure factor are given by 𝑆𝑥0𝑥0 k,𝜔 =S𝑥𝑥 k,𝜔 sin2𝜃 cos2𝜑+S 𝑦𝑦 k,𝜔 sin2𝜑 − S𝑥𝑦 k,𝜔+S 𝑦𝑥 k,𝜔 2 si...

  7. [6]

    Gong and X

    C. Gong and X. Zhang, Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices, Science363, eaav4450 (2019)

    2019

  8. [7]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two- dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature546, 265 (2017)

    2017

Show all 117 references
  1. [8]

    Chu, and X

    Z.Fei,B.Huang,P.Malinowski,W.Wang,T.Song,J.Sanchez, W.Yao,D.Xiao,X.Zhu,A.F.May,W.Wu,D.H.Cobden,J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2, Nat. Mater.17, 778 (2018). 11

    2018

  2. [9]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature563, 94 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Shang, C. Jiang, A. Rasmita, W. Gao, and T. Yu, DirectPhotoluminescenceProbingofFerromagnetisminMono- layer Two-Dimensional CrBr3, Nano Letters19, 3138 (2019)

    2019

  4. [11]

    Bedoya-Pinto, J.-R

    A. Bedoya-Pinto, J.-R. Ji, A. K. Pandeya, P. Gargiani, M. Valvi- dares, P. Sessi, J. M. Taylor, F. Radu, K. Chang, and S. S. P. Parkin, Intrinsic 2D-XY ferromagnetism in a van der Waals monolayer, Science374, 616 (2021)

    2021

  5. [12]

    Toulouse, Theory of the frustration effect in spin glasses: I, in Spin Glass Theory and Beyond, pp

    G. Toulouse, Theory of the frustration effect in spin glasses: I, in Spin Glass Theory and Beyond, pp. 99–103

  6. [13]

    Soriano, M

    D. Soriano, M. I. Katsnelson, and J. Fernández-Rossier, Mag- netic Two-Dimensional Chromium Trihalides: A Theoretical Perspective, Nano Lett.20, 6225 (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    1966

  8. [15]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, andX.Xu,Layer-dependentferromagnetisminavanderWaals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    P. P. Stavropoulos, X. Liu, and H.-Y. Kee, Magnetic anisotropy in spin-3/2 with heavy ligand in honeycomb Mott insulators: Application toCrI3, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013216 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    Witczak-Krempa, G

    W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Balents, Cor- related Quantum Phenomena in the Strong Spin-Orbit Regime, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.5, 57 (2014)

    2014

  11. [18]

    Sriram Shastry and B

    B. Sriram Shastry and B. Sutherland, Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet, Physica B+C108, 1069 (1981)

    1981

  12. [19]

    J.VannimenusandG.Toulouse,Theoryofthefrustrationeffect. II. Ising spins on a square lattice, J. Phys. C10, L537 (1977)

    1977

  13. [20]

    D. U. Ferreiro, E. A. Komives, and P. G. Wolynes, Frustration, function and folding, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.48, 68 (2018)

    2018

  14. [21]

    Shintani and H

    H. Shintani and H. Tanaka, Frustration on the way to crystal- lization in glass, Nat. Phys.2, 200 (2006)

    2006

  15. [22]

    A. P. Ramirez, Strongly Geometrically Frustrated Magnets, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.24, 453 (1994)

    1994

  16. [23]

    G. H. Wannier, Antiferromagnetism. The Triangular Ising Net, Phys. Rev.79, 357 (1950)

    1950

  17. [24]

    Villain, R

    J. Villain, R. Bidaux, J.-P. Carton, and R. Conte, Order as an effect of disorder, Journal de Physique41, 1263 (1980)

    1980

  18. [25]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature464, 199 EP (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature464, 199 EP (2010)

    2010

  19. [26]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2017)

    2017

  20. [27]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-Liquid Ground State of the𝑆 = 1/2 Kagome Heisenberg Antiferromagnet, Science 332, 1173 (2011)

    2011

  21. [28]

    Z.ZhuandS.R.White,Spinliquidphaseofthe 𝑆= 1 2 𝐽1−𝐽2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 041105 (2015)

    2015

  22. [29]

    Iqbal, W.-J

    Y. Iqbal, W.-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, and F. Becca, Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg𝐽1−𝐽2 triangular antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. B93, 144411 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    A. V. Chubukov and D. I. Golosov, Quantum theory of an antiferromagnet on a triangular lattice in a magnetic field, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter3, 69 (1991)

    1991

  24. [31]

    E. F. Shender, Antiferromagnetic garnets with fluctuationally interacting sublattices, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics56, 178 (1982)

    1982

  25. [32]

    C. L. Henley, Ordering by disorder: Ground-state selection in fcc vector antiferromagnets, J. Appl. Phys.61, 3962 (1987)

    1987

  26. [33]

    C. L. Henley, Ordering due to disorder in a frustrated vector antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2056 (1989)

    1989

  27. [34]

    Chandra, P

    P. Chandra, P. Coleman, and A. I. Larkin, Ising transition in frustrated Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 88 (1990)

    1990

  28. [35]

    A.V.ChubukovandT.Jolicoeur,Order-from-disorderphenom- enainHeisenbergantiferromagnetsonatriangularlattice,Phys. Rev. B46, 11137 (1992)

    1992

  29. [36]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky, M. V. Gvozdikova, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and R. Moessner, Quantum Order by Disorder and Accidental Soft Mode inEr2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 077204 (2012)

    2012

  30. [37]

    Alicea, A

    J. Alicea, A. V. Chubukov, and O. A. Starykh, Quantum Stabi- lization of the1/3-Magnetization Plateau inCs2CuBr4, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 137201 (2009)

    2009

  31. [38]

    Takano, H

    J. Takano, H. Tsunetsugu, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Self- consistent spin wave analysis of the magnetization plateau in triangular antiferromagnet, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.320, 012011 (2011)

    2011

  32. [39]

    A.Chubukov,Orderfromdisorderinakagoméantiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 832 (1992)

    1992

  33. [40]

    G.-W.ChernandR.Moessner,DipolarOrderbyDisorderinthe Classical Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on the Kagome Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 077201 (2013)

    2013

  34. [41]

    A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Quantum Selection of Order in an𝑋𝑋𝑍 Antiferromagnet on a Kagome Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 237202 (2014)

    2014

  35. [42]

    Nussinov and J

    Z. Nussinov and J. van den Brink, Compass models: Theory and physical motivations, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1 (2015)

    2015

  36. [43]

    P. A. McClarty, P. Stasiak, and M. J. P. Gingras, Order-by- disorder in the𝑋𝑌 pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024425 (2014)

    2014

  37. [44]

    Shannon, and M

    L.D.C.Jaubert,O.Benton,J.G.Rau,J.Oitmaa,R.R.P.Singh, N. Shannon, and M. J. P. Gingras, Are Multiphase Competition and Order by Disorder the Keys to UnderstandingYb2Ti2O7?, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 267208 (2015)

    2015

  38. [45]

    Ter Haar, M

    D. Ter Haar, M. E. Lines, and B. Bleaney, A spin-wave theory of anisotropic antiferromagnetica, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., A255, 1 (1962)

    1962

  39. [46]

    Schick, T

    R. Schick, T. Ziman, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Quantum versus thermal fluctuations in the fcc antiferromagnet: Alternative routes to order by disorder, Phys. Rev. B102, 220405 (2020)

    2020

  40. [47]

    Schick, O

    R. Schick, O. Götze, T. Ziman, R. Zinke, J. Richter, and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Ground-state selection by magnon interactions in a fcc antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B106, 094431 (2022)

    2022

  41. [48]

    Elliot, P

    M. Elliot, P. A. McClarty, D. Prabhakaran, R. D. Johnson, H. C. Walker, P. Manuel, and R. Coldea, Order-by-disorder 12 frombond-dependentexchangeandintensitysignatureofnodal quasiparticles in a honeycomb cobaltate, Nature Communica- tions 12, 3936 (2021)

    2021

  42. [49]

    Khaliullin, Order from disorder: Quantum spin gap in magnon spectra ofLaTiO3, Phys

    G. Khaliullin, Order from disorder: Quantum spin gap in magnon spectra ofLaTiO3, Phys. Rev. B64, 212405 (2001)

    2001

  43. [50]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006), january Special Issue

    2006

  44. [51]

    Chaloupka, G

    J. Chaloupka, G. Jackeli, and G. Khaliullin, Kitaev-Heisenberg Model on a Honeycomb Lattice: Possible Exotic Phases in Iridium Oxides𝐴2IrO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 027204 (2010)

    2010

  45. [52]

    Sizyuk, P

    Y. Sizyuk, P. Wölfle, and N. B. Perkins, Selection of direction of the ordered moments inNa2IrO3 and𝛼−RuCl3, Phys. Rev. B 94, 085109 (2016)

    2016

  46. [53]

    Rousochatzakis, J

    I. Rousochatzakis, J. Reuther, R. Thomale, S. Rachel, and N. B. Perkins, Phase Diagram and Quantum Order by Disorder in the Kitaev ${K}_{1}\ensuremath{-}{K}_{2}$ Honeycomb Magnet, Phys. Rev. X5, 041035 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Kimchi and A

    I. Kimchi and A. Vishwanath, Kitaev-Heisenberg models for iridates on the triangular, hyperkagome, kagome, fcc, and pyrochlore lattices, Phys. Rev. B89, 014414 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Rousochatzakis, U

    I. Rousochatzakis, U. K. Rössler, J. van den Brink, and M. Daghofer, Kitaev anisotropy induces mesoscopicZ2 vortex crystals in frustrated hexagonal antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 93, 104417 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Q. Luo, S. Hu, B. Xi, J. Zhao, and X. Wang, Ground-state phase diagram of an anisotropic spin-1 2 model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B95, 165110 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Li, S.-L

    K. Li, S.-L. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Global phase diagram, possible chiral spin liquid, and topological superconductivity in the triangular Kitaev–Heisenberg model, New J. Phys.17, 043032 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    Kos and M

    P. Kos and M. Punk, Quantum spin liquid ground states of the Heisenberg-Kitaev model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024421 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Catuneanu, J

    A. Catuneanu, J. G. Rau, H.-S. Kim, and H.-Y. Kee, Magnetic orders proximal to the Kitaev limit in frustrated triangular systems: Application toBa3IrTi2O9, Phys. Rev. B92, 165108 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Shinjo, S

    K. Shinjo, S. Sota, S. Yunoki, K. Totsuka, and T. To- hyama, Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Study of Ki- taev–Heisenberg Model on a Triangular Lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 114710 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 017205 (2009)

    2009

  55. [63]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Generic Spin Model for theHoneycombIridatesbeyondthe Kitaev Limit,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    J. G. Rau and H.-Y. Kee, Trigonal distortion in the honeycomb iridates: Proximity of zigzag and spiral phases in Na2IrO3 (2014), arXiv:1408.4811

    2014 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Y.-D. Li, X. Wang, and G. Chen, Anisotropic spin model of strong spin-orbit-coupled triangular antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B94, 035107 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Z. Ma, J. Wang, Z.-Y. Dong, J. Zhang, S. Li, S.-H. Zheng, Y. Yu, W. Wang, L. Che, K. Ran, S. Bao, Z. Cai, P. Čermák, A. Schneidewind, S. Yano, J. S. Gardner, X. Lu, S.-L. Yu, J.-M. Liu, S. Li, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Spin-Glass Ground State in a Triangular-Lattice CompoundYbZnGa...

    2018

  59. [67]

    Y. Li, H. Liao, Z. Zhang, S. Li, F. Jin, L. Ling, L. Zhang, Y. Zou, L. Pi, Z. Yang, J. Wang, Z. Wu, and Q. Zhang, Gapless quantum spin liquid ground state in the two-dimensional spin- 1/2 triangular antiferromagnet YbMgGaO4, Sci. Rep.5, 16419 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    Y. Li, G. Chen, W. Tong, L. Pi, J. Liu, Z. Yang, X. Wang, and Q.Zhang,Rare-EarthTriangularLatticeSpinLiquid: ASingle- Crystal Study ofYbMgGaO4, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 167203 (2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    J. A. Paddison, M. Daum, Z. Dun, G. Ehlers, Y. Liu, M. Stone, H. Zhou, and M. Mourigal, Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO4, Nat. Phys. 13, 117 (2017)

    2017

  62. [70]

    Zhang, F

    X. Zhang, F. Mahmood, M. Daum, Z. Dun, J. A. M. Paddison, N. J. Laurita, T. Hong, H. Zhou, N. P. Armitage, and M. Mouri- gal,HierarchyofExchangeInteractionsintheTriangular-Lattice Spin LiquidYbMgGaO4, Phys. Rev. X8, 031001 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Z. Zhu, P. A. Maksimov, S. R. White, and A. L. Chernyshev, Disorder-Induced Mimicry of a Spin Liquid inYbMgGaO4, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 157201 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    J. Wu, J. Li, Z. Zhang, C. Liu, Y. H. Gao, E. Feng, G. Deng, Q.Ren,Z.Wang,R.Chen,J.Embs,F.Zhu,Q.Huang,Z.Xiang, L. Chen, Y. Wu, E. S. Choi, Z. Qu, L. Li, J. Wang, H. Zhou, Y. Su, X. Wang, G. Chen, Q. Zhang, and J. Ma, Magnetic field effects on the quantum spin liquid behaviors ...

    2022

  65. [73]

    Steinhardt, P

    W. Steinhardt, P. A. Maksimov, S. Dissanayake, Z. Shi, N. P. Butch, D. Graf, A. Podlesnyak, Y. Liu, Y. Zhao, G. Xu, J. W. Lynn, C. Marjerrison, A. L. Chernyshev, and S. Haravifard, Phase diagram of YbZnGaO4 in applied magnetic field, npj Quantum Mater.6, 78 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Ma, Z.-Y

    Z. Ma, Z.-Y. Dong, J. Wang, S. Zheng, K. Ran, S. Bao, Z. Cai, Y.Shangguan,W.Wang,M.Boehm,P.Steffens,L.-P.Regnault, X. Wang, Y. Su, S.-L. Yu, J.-M. Liu, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen, Disorder-inducedbroadeningofthespinwavesinthetriangular- lattice quantum spin liquid candidateYbZnGaO4,...

    2021

  67. [75]

    F. L. Pratt, F. Lang, W. Steinhardt, S. Haravifard, and S. J. Blundell, Spin dynamics, entanglement, and the nature of the spin liquid state inYbZnGaO4, Phys. Rev. B106, L060401 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    W. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Ji, Y. Liu, J. Li, X. Wang, H. Lei, G. Chen, and Q. Zhang, Rare-Earth Chalcogenides: A Large Family of Triangular Lattice Spin Liquid Candidates, Chin. Phys. Lett. 35, 117501 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    M. M. Bordelon, E. Kenney, C. Liu, T. Hogan, L. Posthuma, M. Kavand, Y. Lyu, M. Sherwin, N. P. Butch, C. Brown, M. J. Graf, L. Balents, and S. D. Wilson, Field-tunable quantum disorderedgroundstateinthetriangular-latticeantiferromagnet NaYbO2, Nat. Phys.15, 1058 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Shikano, C

    M. Shikano, C. Delmas, and J. Darriet, NaRuO 2 and Na𝑥RuO2·𝑦H2O: New Oxide and Oxyhydrate with Two Di- mensional RuO2 Layers, Inorg. Chem.43, 1214 (2004)

    2004

  71. [79]

    T. Xie, A. A. Eberharter, J. Xing, S. Nishimoto, M. Brando, P. Khanenko, J. Sichelschmidt, A. A. Turrini, D. G. Maz- zone, P. G. Naumov, L. D. Sanjeewa, N. Harrison, A. S. Se- fat, B. Normand, A. M. Läuchli, A. Podlesnyak, and S. E. Nikitin, Complete field-induced spectral res...

    2023

  72. [80]

    G. Ding, H. Wo, R. L. Luo, Y. Gu, Y. Gu, R. Bewley, G. Chen, and J. Zhao, Stripe order and spin dynamics in the triangular- lattice antiferromagnetKErSe2: A single-crystal study with a theoretical description, Phys. Rev. B107, L100411 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    A. O. Scheie, E. A. Ghioldi, J. Xing, J. A. M. Paddison, N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, L. D. Sanjeewa, S. Lee, A. J. Woods, D. Abernathy, D. M. Pajerowski, T. J. Williams, S.-S. Zhang, L. O. Manuel, A. E. Trumper, C. D. Pemmaraju, A. S. Sefat, D. S. Parker, T. P. Devereaux, R. Mov...

    2024

  74. [82]

    T. Xie, S. Gozel, J. Xing, N. Zhao, S. M. Avdoshenko, L. Wu, A. S. Sefat, A. L. Chernyshev, A. M. Läuchli, A. Podlesnyak, and S. E. Nikitin, Quantum Spin Dynamics Due to Strong Kitaev Interactions in the Triangular-Lattice Antiferromagnet CsCeSe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096703 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    M. Xie, W. Zhuo, Y. Cai, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhang, Rare- Earth Chalcogenides: An Inspiring Playground for Exploring Frustrated Magnetism, Chin. Phys. Lett.41, 117505 (2024). 13

    2024

  76. [84]

    Becker, M

    M. Becker, M. Hermanns, B. Bauer, M. Garst, and S. Trebst, Spin-orbit physics of𝑗 = 1 2 Mott insulators on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B91, 155135 (2015)

    2015

  77. [85]

    B. R. Ortiz, P. M. Sarte, A. H. Avidor, A. Hay, E. Kenney, A. I. Kolesnikov, D. M. Pajerowski, A. A. Aczel, K. M. Taddei, C. M. Brown, C. Wang, M. J. Graf, R. Seshadri, L. Balents, and S. D. Wilson, Quantum disordered ground state in the triangular-lattice magnet NaRuO2, Nat. ...

    2023

  78. [86]

    anisotropic-exchange model

    and density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) [87] calculations. Our results are summarized in Fig. 1. Moreover, we show that anisotropic bond-dependent terms contribute to magnon interaction self-energy, which can be significant in some parts of the Brillouin zone and yield...

  79. [87]

    Razpopov, D

    A. Razpopov, D. A. S. Kaib, S. Backes, L. Balents, S. D. Wilson, F. Ferrari, K. Riedl, and R. Valentí, A𝑗eff = 1/2 Kitaev material on the triangular lattice: the case of NaRuO2, npj Quantum Mater.8, 36 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    Bhattacharyya, N

    P. Bhattacharyya, N. A. Bogdanov, S. Nishimoto, S. D. Wil- son, and L. Hozoi, NaRuO2: Kitaev-Heisenberg exchange in triangular-lattice setting, npj Quantum Mater.8, 52 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    Gooch, and P

    A.Möller,N.E.Amuneke,P.Daniel,B.Lorenz,C.R.delaCruz, M. Gooch, and P. C. W. Chu,𝐴Ag2𝑀[VO4]2 (𝐴 = Ba, Sr; 𝑀 = Co, Ni): A series of ferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 85, 214422 (2012)

    2012

  82. [90]

    R. Rawl, M. Lee, E. S. Choi, G. Li, K. W. Chen, R. Baumbach, C. R. dela Cruz, J. Ma, and H. D. Zhou, Magnetic properties of the triangular lattice magnets𝐴4𝐵 ′ 𝐵2O12 (𝐴= Ba, Sr, La; 𝐵 ′ = Co, Ni, Mn;𝐵= W, Re), Phys. Rev. B95, 174438 (2017)

    2017

  83. [91]

    Jackeli and A

    G. Jackeli and A. Avella, Quantum order by disorder in the Kitaev model on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B92, 184416 (2015)

    2015

  84. [92]

    Jiang, S

    S. Jiang, S. R. White, and A. L. Chernyshev, Quantum phases in the honeycomb-lattice𝐽1–𝐽3 ferro-antiferromagnetic model, Phys. Rev. B108, L180406 (2023)

    2023

  85. [93]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormal- ization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  86. [94]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  87. [95]

    Note that there is a typo in Ref.[54]: wrong sign in front of (1−Δ) in𝐴k

  88. [96]

    M. W. Long, Effects that can stabilise multiple spin-density waves, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter1, 2857 (1989)

    1989

  89. [97]

    D. L. Bergman, R. Shindou, G. A. Fiete, and L. Balents, Degenerate perturbation theory of quantum fluctuations in a pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B75, 094403 (2007)

    2007

  90. [98]

    Phys.: Conf

    M.E.Zhitomirsky,Real-spaceperturbationtheoryforfrustrated magnets: application to magnetization plateaus, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 592, 012110 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Wenzel, T

    S. Wenzel, T. Coletta, S. E. Korshunov, and F. Mila, Evidence for Columnar Order in the Fully Frustrated Transverse Field IsingModelontheSquareLattice,Phys.Rev.Lett. 109,187202 (2012)

    2012

  92. [100]

    T.Coletta,S.E.Korshunov,andF.Mila,Semiclassicalevidence of columnar order in the fully frustrated transverse-field Ising model on the square lattice, Phys. Rev. B90, 205109 (2014)

    2014

  93. [101]

    Coletta, M

    T. Coletta, M. E. Zhitomirsky, and F. Mila, Quantum stabiliza- tion of classically unstable plateau structures, Phys. Rev. B87, 060407 (2013)

    2013

  94. [102]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and T. Nikuni, Magnetization curve of a square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B57, 5013 (1998)

    1998

  95. [103]

    Thalmeier, M

    P. Thalmeier, M. E. Zhitomirsky, B. Schmidt, and N. Shan- non, Quantum effects in magnetization of𝐽1−𝐽2 square lattice antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B77, 104441 (2008)

    2008

  96. [104]

    Mourigal, M

    M. Mourigal, M. E. Zhitomirsky, and A. L. Chernyshev, Field- induced decay dynamics in square-lattice antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B82, 144402 (2010)

    2010

  97. [105]

    P.A.Maksimov,M.E.Zhitomirsky,andA.L.Chernyshev,Field- induceddecaysinXXZtriangular-latticeantiferromagnets,Phys. Rev. B94, 140407 (2016)

    2016

  98. [106]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensorsoftware libraryfortensornetwork calculations(2020), arXiv:2007.14822

    2020 arXiv

  99. [107]

    A. L. Chernyshev and P. A. Maksimov, Damped Topological Magnons in the Kagome-Lattice Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 187203 (2016)

    2016

  100. [108]

    J.G.Rau,R.Moessner,andP.A.McClarty,Magnoninteractions in the frustrated pyrochlore ferromagnetYb2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104423 (2019)

    2019

  101. [109]

    A. Mook, K. Plekhanov, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Interaction- StabilizedTopologicalMagnonInsulatorinFerromagnets,Phys. Rev. X11, 021061 (2021)

    2021

  102. [110]

    Hickey, D

    A. Hickey, D. Lozano-Gómez, and M. J. P. Gingras, Order- by-disorder without quantum zero-point fluctuations in the py- rochlore Heisenberg ferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (2025), arXiv:2403.02391

    2025 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Moessner, and K

    P.A.McClarty,X.-Y.Dong,M.Gohlke,J.G.Rau,F.Pollmann, R. Moessner, and K. Penc, Topological magnons in Kitaev magnets at high fields, Phys. Rev. B98, 060404 (2018)

    2018

  104. [112]

    P. M. Cônsoli, L. Janssen, M. Vojta, and E. C. Andrade, Heisenberg-Kitaev model in a magnetic field:1/𝑆 expansion, Phys. Rev. B102, 155134 (2020)

    2020

  105. [113]

    Koyama and J

    S. Koyama and J. Nasu, Flavor-wave theory with quasiparticle damping at finite temperatures: Application to chiral edge modes in the Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. B108, 235162 (2023)

    2023

  106. [114]

    C. A. Gallegos and A. L. Chernyshev, Magnon interactions in the quantum paramagnetic phase ofCoNb2O6, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014424 (2024)

    2024

  107. [115]

    P. A. Maksimov and A. L. Chernyshev, Easy-plane anisotropic- exchange magnets on a honeycomb lattice: Quantum effects and dealing with them, Phys. Rev. B106, 214411 (2022)

    2022

  108. [116]

    A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Spin waves in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet: Decays, spectrum renormal- ization, and singularities, Phys. Rev. B79, 144416 (2009)

    2009

  109. [117]

    M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Sponta- neous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 219 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.