pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24731 · v1 · pith:LXFVLXDWnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 💻 cs.HC

SciFi-VIS: Way Out There -- How SciFi and Visualization Influence Each Other

Ulrik G\"unther , Juli\'an M\'endez , Gabriela Molina Le\'on , Samuel Pantze , Mario Romero , Abdulhaq Adetunji Salako , Annalena Ulschmid This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords visualizationscience fictionworkshopinterdisciplinaryIEEE VIShuman-computer interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

A half-day workshop at VIS 2026 is proposed to build a systematic account of how visualization research and science fiction have shaped each other.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a hybrid workshop that gathers visualization researchers and science fiction creators to examine their long-standing mutual influence. Submissions of creative work are invited to surface concrete connections and suggest new research directions. Planned activities include a keynote, short talks, group brainstorming, cross-community critique, and affinity mapping to extract shared themes. The authors argue that structured interaction of this kind can turn anecdotal exchanges into an organized body of knowledge about the two fields.

Core claim

By convening the two communities in one structured half-day event with submission, critique, and mapping activities, it becomes possible to identify recurring patterns in how science fiction has informed visualization techniques and how visualization methods have informed science fiction storytelling.

What carries the argument

The workshop program itself (keynote, lightning talks, brainstorming, cross-community critique, affinity mapping, and theme discussion) as the mechanism for converting individual examples into shared themes.

If this is right

  • Visualization researchers will be able to cite documented sci-fi precedents when proposing new visual encodings or interaction techniques.
  • Science fiction creators will gain access to current visualization methods that can be incorporated into narratives or world-building.
  • The workshop outputs will supply concrete starting points for joint projects between the two groups.
  • Future VIS workshops can adopt the same submission-plus-mapping format when exploring other external fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A public archive of the submitted creative works could serve as an ongoing reference for both communities after the event.
  • The identified themes might reveal historical periods when influence flowed more strongly in one direction than the other.
  • If the mapping process succeeds, similar workshops could be organized at other conferences to link visualization with literature, film, or design.

Load-bearing premise

That one half-day meeting with the listed activities will move the conversation from scattered examples to an organized, reusable understanding of the relationship.

What would settle it

If the affinity-mapping and discussion sessions produce only lists of individual examples without any identified cross-cutting themes or reusable categories that participants can apply afterward, the claim of systematic understanding would fail.

read the original abstract

We propose a hybrid half-day workshop at IEEE VIS 2026, calling for participation from visualization researchers and science fiction creators in order to develop a systematic understanding of the two-way relationship these communities have long shared. We invite submissions of creative formats showcasing connections and inspiring future research. Our workshop plan includes a keynote, lightning talks, brainstorming, cross-community critique, affinity mapping, and discussion around identified themes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid half-day workshop at IEEE VIS 2026 to develop a systematic understanding of the two-way relationship between visualization researchers and science fiction creators. It outlines activities including a keynote, lightning talks, brainstorming, cross-community critique, affinity mapping, and discussion around themes, while inviting creative submissions showcasing connections.

Significance. If realized, the workshop could foster valuable cross-community dialogue and inspire new visualization research directions informed by science fiction narratives. The proposal merits credit for its inclusive call for participation from both communities and for specifying a range of interactive formats (keynote through affinity mapping) intended to encourage creative exchange.

major comments (1)
  1. [Workshop Plan] The central claim that the workshop will 'develop a systematic understanding' of the SciFi-VIS relationship is load-bearing but unsupported by the described plan. The listed activities are standard exploratory formats; no section specifies synthesis methods, data collection protocols, validation steps, or post-workshop analysis that would elevate outputs beyond shared anecdotes and themes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the workshop's potential to foster cross-community dialogue and for recommending major revision. We address the major comment below, agreeing that the manuscript requires strengthening to support its central claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the workshop will 'develop a systematic understanding' of the SciFi-VIS relationship is load-bearing but unsupported by the described plan. The listed activities are standard exploratory formats; no section specifies synthesis methods, data collection protocols, validation steps, or post-workshop analysis that would elevate outputs beyond shared anecdotes and themes.

    Authors: We agree with this assessment. The current manuscript lists activities but does not detail how they will produce systematic understanding beyond the exploratory formats themselves. We will revise the proposal by adding a new subsection under the workshop plan that specifies: (1) synthesis via documented affinity mapping outputs and thematic clustering during the session; (2) data collection through optional participant consent forms for notes and feedback; (3) post-workshop analysis consisting of a public summary report and potential follow-up survey; and (4) validation through community feedback on the report. This will make the path from activities to the stated goal explicit without overclaiming rigor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No derivation chain or self-referential reductions present

full rationale

This is a workshop proposal paper with no equations, parameters, predictions, or derivations. The central claim (that the listed activities will develop systematic understanding) is presented as a direct plan without any reduction to prior inputs, self-citations, or fitted quantities. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns; the document is self-contained as an event proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented entities are invoked; the document is an event proposal without technical derivations or data analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5620 in / 946 out tokens · 22677 ms · 2026-06-25T22:38:05.576075+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    BagheriFard, R

    Z. BagheriFard, R. Guarese, L. Quintero, F. Johnson, B. Edvinsson, and M. Romero. Enhancing manufacturing training through aug- mented situated visualization. InHuman-Computer Interaction – IN- TERACT 2025, pp. 66–71. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2026. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-05008-3 14 3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05008-3 2025

  2. [2]

    M. Blythe. Research Fiction: Storytelling, Plot and Design. InProc. of ACM CHI, CHI ’17, pp. 5400–5411. ACM, New York, NY , USA, May 2017. doi: 10.1145/3025453.3026023 1

    work page doi:10.1145/3025453.3026023 2017

  3. [3]

    A. Iop, O. Viberg, A. Elmi-Terander, E. Edstr ¨om, and M. Romero. On extended reality objective performance metrics for neurosurgical training. InEC-TEL, pp. 573–579. Springer, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978 -3-031-42682-7 44 3

    work page doi:10.1007/978 2023

  4. [4]

    Exploring the Referral and Usage of Science Fiction in HCI Literature.Lecture Notes in Computer Science,

    Jordan, Mubin, Obaid, and Silva. Exploring the Referral and Usage of Science Fiction in HCI Literature.Lecture Notes in Computer Science,

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91803-7 2 1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91803-7

  6. [6]

    Kiianmies, A

    T. Kiianmies, A. Colley, and J. H ¨akkil¨a. Exploring the Design of Portable Devices in Science Fiction Video Games. InHCII 2025, pp. 388–401. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Jan. 2026. doi: 10. 1007/978-3-032-12808-9 24 1

    2025

  7. [7]

    Srinivasan, N

    B. Kong, R.-H. Liang, M. Liu, S.-H. Chang, H.-C. Tseng, and C.-H. Ju. Neuromancer Workshop: Towards Designing Experiential Entan- glement with Science Fiction. InProc. of ACM CHI, CHI ’21, pp. 1–17. ACM, New York, NY , USA, May 2021. doi: 10.1145/3411764 .3445273 1

    work page doi:10.1145/3411764 2021

  8. [8]

    Hayatpur, D

    K. Krings, N. S. Bohn, N. A. L. Hille, and T. Ludwig. “What if ev- eryone is able to program?” – Exploring the Role of Software De- velopment in Science Fiction. InProc. of ACM CHI, CHI ’23, pp. 1–13. ACM, New York, NY , USA, Apr. 2023. doi: 10.1145/3544548. 3581436 1

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548 2023

  9. [9]

    A. Marcus. T12: Rockets, Robots, and AI: HCI/UX in Science-Fiction Movies/TV. 1

  10. [10]

    A. Marcus. T15: HCI/UX in Science-Fiction Movies/TV: What Can We Learn from the Past 100 Years of the Future?|HCI International

  11. [11]

    Marcus, D

    A. Marcus, D. A. Norman, R. Rucker, B. Sterling, and V . Vinge. Sci-fi at CHI: Cyberpunk novelists predict future user interfaces. InProc. of ACM CHI, CHI ’92, pp. 435–437. ACM, New York, NY , USA, June

  12. [12]

    doi: 10.1145/142750.142892 1

    work page doi:10.1145/142750.142892

  13. [13]

    Marcus, E

    A. Marcus, E. Soloway, B. Sterling, M. Swanwick, and V . Vinge. Opening pleanary: sci-fi @ CHI-99: science-fiction authors predict future user interfaces. InExtended Abstracts of the ACM CHI, CHI EA ’99, pp. 95–96. ACM, New York, NY , USA, May 1999. doi: 10. 1145/632716.632775 1

    arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    M ´endez, W

    J. M ´endez, W. Luo, R. Rzayev, W. B ¨uschel, and R. Dachselt. Im- mersive data-driven storytelling: Scoping an emerging field through the lenses of research, journalism, and games.IEEE TVCG, 31:6839– 6851, 1 2025. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2025.3531138 3

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3531138 2025

  15. [15]

    Molina Le ´on, A

    G. Molina Le ´on, A. Bezerianos, O. Gladin, and P. Isenberg. Talk to the wall: The role of speech interaction in collaborative visual analytics. IEEE TVCG, 31(1):941–951, 2025. doi: 10/g88nds 3

    2025

  16. [16]

    Molina Le ´on, M

    G. Molina Le ´on, M. Lischka, W. Luo, and A. Breiter. Mobile and multimodal? A comparative evaluation of interactive workplaces for visual data exploration.Comput. Graph. Forum, 41(3):417–428, 2022. doi: 10/g88ncq 3

    2022

  17. [17]

    Mubin, M

    O. Mubin, M. Obaid, P. Jordan, P. Alves-Oliveria, T. Eriksson, W. Barendregt, D. Sjolle, M. Fjeld, S. Simoff, and M. Billinghurst. To- wards an Agenda for Sci-Fi Inspired HCI Research. InProc. ACE’16, ACE ’16, pp. 1–6. ACM, New York, NY , USA, Nov. 2016. doi: 10. 1145/3001773.3001786 1

    arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Ahn and N

    S. Pantze, J.-Y . Tinevez, M. McGinity, and U. G ¨unther. manvr3d: A platform for human-in-the-loop cell tracking in virtual reality. In2025 IEEE VIS, pp. 356–360, 2025. doi: 10.1109/VIS60296.2025.00077 3

    work page doi:10.1109/vis60296.2025.00077 2025

  19. [19]

    Perin, W

    C. Perin, W. Willett, K. Currier, L. Oehlberg, and S. Carpendale. IEEE VIS 2020 Virtual : Vis Futures: Design Fiction Methods for Envision- ing Tomorrow’s Visualizations. 1, 2

    2020

  20. [20]

    A. A. Salako, H. Hagen, and C. Tominski. Animated Transition be- tween Node-Link and Parallel Coordinates Visualizations. InJapan- Vis, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.16563 3

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.16563 2025

  21. [21]

    Ulschmid, K

    A. Ulschmid, K. Kr ¨osl, M. Wimmer, and B. Kerbl. Automated pri- oritization for Context-Aware re-rendering in editing.SN Computer Science, 6(4):353, Apr. 2025. doi: 10.1007/s42979-025-03863-z 3

    work page doi:10.1007/s42979-025-03863-z 2025

  22. [22]

    M. M. Vasiliu, R. Guarese, J. Jaatinen, F. Johnson, B. Edvinsson, and M. Romero. Towards enhancing industrial training through conversa- tional ai. InProc. CUI. ACM, New York, NY , USA, 2025. doi: 10. 1145/3719160.3737643 3

    arXiv 2025