The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2003.06323 · v1 · pith:M2X6DY5H · submitted 2020-03-13 · cs.HC

Mobile Text Entry Behaviour in Lab and In-the-Wild studies: Is it different?

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:M2X6DY5Hrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.HC
keywords entrytextbehaviourin-the-wildmobilerealremainsstudies
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Text entry in smartphones remains a critical element of mobile HCI. It has been widely studied in lab settings, using primarily transcription tasks, and to a far lesser extent through in-the-wild (field) experiments. So far it remains unknown how well user behaviour during lab transcription tasks approximates real use. In this paper, we present a study that provides evidence that lab text entry behaviour is clearly distinguishable from real world use. Using machine learning techniques, we show that it is possible to accurately identify the type of study in which text entry sessions took place. The implications of our findings relate to the design of future studies in text entry, aiming to support input with virtual smartphone keyboards.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.