Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Mapping Large-Scale-Structure Evolution over Cosmic Times

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A space-borne line-intensity mapping mission covering 100–2000 GHz could map large-scale structure across cosmic time, detecting [CII] through the epoch of reionization and beating Planck on key cosmological parameters.

desk verdict A candid, useful science case for a space-borne far-IR/sub-mm LIM mission; the headline forecasts are genuinely new for this instrument but rest on line-luminosity assumptions that the authors themselves rate as uncertain by an order of magnitude at high z. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07533 v2 pith:M3EWMHMO submitted 2019-08-20 astro-ph.CO

Marta B. Silva , Ely D. Kovetz , Garrett K. Keating , Azadeh Moradinezhad Dizgah , Matthieu Bethermin , Patrick Breysse , Kirit Kartare , Jose L. Bernal
show 1 more author
Jacques Delabrouille
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords line-intensitymappingepochofreionization[CII]158micronlineCOrotationaltransitionscosmicinfraredbackgroundprimordialnon-Gaussianityspacemissionconceptstarformationhistory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a single space observatory sweeping the 100–2000 GHz range, if built, could turn line-intensity mapping into a tomographic survey of large-scale structure from z≈0 to z≈8. The core assertion is that the frequency range lets one observe many spectral lines—[CII] 158 µm, a ladder of CO rotational lines, and FIR fine-structure lines—from the same structures, so interloping lines can be separated in map space. On that basis the authors forecast a high-significance [CII] power-spectrum detection during the Epoch of Reionization (SNR>10), CO line detections with SNR~50 for low-J transitions, and cosmological parameter constraints that would beat Planck, including σ(f_NL^loc)=0.75. The wider payoff would be a direct, unbiased census of star formation, molecular gas, dust, and the ionizing sources of reionization across a large fraction of the observable volume.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument is line-intensity mapping (LIM), in which all photons at a given frequency are collected and the spatial fluctuations of redshifted spectral-line emission trace the underlying density field. What makes this mission concept work, in the paper's telling, is broad continuous frequency coverage: observing several CO rotational lines plus [CII] from the same low-redshift structures lets the observer separate interloping lines in map space, so that [CII] at z>6 can be recovered cleanly. Forecast power-spectrum sensitivities are computed for a 3.5 m telescope cooled to ~8 K with R=300 spectroscopy, 64 dual-polarization beams, and two surveys (full sky and 400 deg² deep), using line intensities derived from IR-luminosity scaling relations and star-formation histories from the EAGLE simulation.

What would settle it

A targeted program with ALMA or JWST measuring rest-frame [CII] 158 µm and CO(1-0) line-to-infrared luminosity ratios for a modest sample at z=6–8 would settle it: if the observed ratios sit at the low end of the modeled range, the predicted EoR [CII] SNR>10 and σ(f_NL)=0.75 collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a space mission with a 3.5 m telescope cooled to about 8 K, a medium-resolution (R=300) spectrometer covering 100–2000 GHz, and both a full-sky survey and a 400 deg² deep survey would measure the [CII] 158 µm line through the Epoch of Reionization with signal-to-noise above 10, detect low-J CO lines up to J=4-3 at SNR~50 and high-J lines at SNR~10, and yield 1-σ uncertainties on cosmological parameters—such as σ(f_NL^loc)=0.75, a factor of nine improvement over Planck—when [CII] intensity maps are combined with Planck priors. These numbers come from scaling line luminosities from infrared luminosity using observationally calibrated relations assumed constant with redshift. The authors present the estimates as preliminary, explicitly noting that the line-intensity model is uncertain by a factor of a few at low redshift and up to an order of magnitude at z>6, and that the CMB's excitation of high-J CO lines at high redshift was not included.

Load-bearing premise

The forecasts stand on the assumption that high-redshift galaxy line emission follows the observationally calibrated infrared-luminosity scaling relations measured at low redshift, despite acknowledged uncertainties of up to an order of magnitude at z>6 and a neglected CMB-heating effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A full-sky plus deep 400 deg² survey would detect the [CII] power spectrum from the Epoch of Reionization at signal-to-noise above 10, yielding a direct probe of the ionizing sources and the ionized fraction.
  • CO line maps spanning z≈0–8 would constrain the CO spectral line energy distribution and the molecular gas content, tightening the CO-to-H₂ conversion factor used across galaxy evolution.
  • The same data would improve constraints on the cosmic star-formation-rate density, including the dust-obscured half, and on the buildup of the cosmic infrared background into the Epoch of Reionization.
  • With Planck priors, a four-year [CII] survey would measure σ(f_NL^loc)=0.75—a factor-of-nine improvement over Planck—and improve constraints on h, A_s, n_s, and N_eff.
  • BAO measurements at 3<z<9 would map the expansion history H(z) across the gap between local distance-ladder estimates and CMB-inferred values, speaking directly to the Hubble tension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the map-space line separation works as argued, the mission concept generalizes to other line combinations—for instance [OIII] 88 µm versus high-J CO—making multi-line LIM a multi-tracer cosmological probe without new hardware.
  • The mission would measure the very high-redshift line-to-IR ratios that current forecasts must assume, effectively calibrating the astrophysics that all ground-based LIM pathfinders depend on.
  • Because the warmer CMB at high redshift can boost high-J CO lines, the high-frequency channels may reveal a CO ladder peaking at higher J than at low redshift; if so, standard low-J CO-to-H₂ conversions would underestimate molecular gas in early galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This ESA Voyage-2050 white paper makes the case for a space-borne line-intensity mapping (LIM) mission covering roughly 50--2000 GHz, targeting [CII], CO rotations, and far-infrared fine-structure lines. It argues that such a mission could map large-scale structure from the Epoch of Reionization to the present, constrain the cosmic star formation history and the cosmic infrared background, identify protoclusters, and deliver competitive cosmological constraints. The quantitative centerpiece is a set of preliminary sensitivity and Fisher forecasts: SNR>10 for [CII] during the EoR, SNR around 50 for low-J CO lines, SNR around 10 for high-J CO lines, and a projected 1-sigma uncertainty sigma(f_NL^loc)=0.75, a factor of 9 better than Planck. The paper explicitly labels these as preliminary estimates and emphasizes the need for future refinement of the line-emission models.

Significance. If the forecasts hold, the paper makes a compelling and timely science case for a far-infrared/sub-millimeter LIM space mission, filling a gap between ground-based LIM experiments and UV/optical missions such as SPHEREx and CDIM. The paper benefits from using standard power-spectrum sensitivity estimates and Fisher-matrix methods, and it is appropriately framed as a white paper rather than a final mission design. It also gives useful credit to the many existing LIM efforts. The central weakness is that the headline SNR and cosmological forecasts scale directly with line-luminosity predictions that the paper itself rates as uncertain by up to an order of magnitude at z>6, with the CMB excitation effect on CO transitions not included. Because no robustness test or propagated uncertainty is provided, the quantitative claims are not yet on as firm a footing as the point-value presentation suggests.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1.2 and Figure 2] The line intensities used throughout the forecasts are obtained by scaling line luminosity from infrared luminosity using observationally based relations assumed constant with redshift. The text states that this modeling is uncertain by 'a factor of a few (low-z) to an order of magnitude towards high-z (z > 6)' and that the CMB effect on suppressing low-J CO and enhancing high-J CO at high redshift was not accounted for. Since every power-spectrum sensitivity and Fisher forecast in the paper scales directly with the assumed line amplitude, an order-of-magnitude overestimate of the z~6-8 [CII] and CO luminosities would erase the headline claims in Section 9 and Table 1, including the EoR [CII] SNR>10 and sigma(f_NL^loc)=0.75. The paper should either propagate the line-model uncertainty into the quoted errors or present a robustness test that rescales the line intensities by, for example, factors of 0.3, 1, and 3, and shows which conclusions survive.
  2. [Section 6.2 and Table 1] The Fisher forecast sigma(f_NL^loc)=0.75 is presented as a point value, but the ingredients of the forecast are not given in this paper: the assumed [CII] luminosity function and bias, the treatment of shot noise and foregrounds, the exact survey parameters, and the prior combination with Planck are all either omitted or cited only indirectly to previous work. Without these details, the reader cannot assess how strongly the constraint depends on the line-intensity model discussed in Section 1.2. The authors should either specify the Fisher-matrix ingredients in an appendix or clearly state which equations from Bernal et al. 2019 and Moradinezhad Dizgah et al. 2019 were used, so that the sensitivity of the forecast to the spectral-line model can be checked.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Only, a space-borne mission can properly meet these requirements.' contains an unnecessary comma after 'Only'.
  2. [Section 1.1] The word 'intergalatic' should be 'intergalactic' in the first paragraph.
  3. [Section 3.1] The text says 'planed for launch in 2023'; this should be 'planned for launch in 2023'.
  4. [Section 5] The phrase 'much modest sensitivity' should be 'much more modest sensitivity' or 'much less demanding sensitivity'.
  5. [Section 9] The summary sentence 'low-J CO lines with SNR ~50 (up to J=4-3), and of order ~10 for high-J lines)' has mismatched parentheses and the notation 'J=4-3' is confusing; it should refer to CO(1-0) through CO(4-3) or similar.
  6. [Figure 2 caption] The caption contains the typo 'submillimiter'; it should be 'submillimeter'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular step: line-intensity forecasts are forward-modeled from external scaling relations, and self-citations supply methods, not target results.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain from the line-luminosity model (Section 1.2, Fig. 2) to the SNR statements (Summary) and Fisher forecasts (Section 6.2, Table 1), I find no step in which a target result is used as an input or in which a fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The line intensities are forward-modeled from IR luminosities via observationally-based scaling relations [19, 88], with the SFR/IR connection taken from the EAGLE simulation and SFRD fit to UV data. The SNR and sigma(f_NL) forecasts are then computed from these fiducial intensities plus a stated instrument model (3.5 m aperture, R=300, 64 beams) and Planck priors. The paper explicitly flags the model's uncertainty ('uncertain by a factor of a few (low-z) to an order of magnitude towards high-z') and the omission of CMB excitation effects; this is a robustness limitation, not circularity. The many self-citations (e.g., [72] for the f_NL Fisher method, [13,14] for BAO forecasts, [21] for SFRD forecasts) provide methods or earlier sensitivity estimates, but the white paper's own specific survey numbers and forecasts do not reduce to those citations as inputs; the cited works are not invoked as the sole justification for the central claims. The central claim is not defined in terms of the method being correct. Hence no circular step under the requiring-evidence standard: score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central forecasts rest on a chain of modeling assumptions: an assumed instrument, empirical line luminosity calibrations with large stated uncertainties, neglect of CMB excitation of CO, and forecasting methods from the authors' own prior work. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Telescope aperture = 3.5 m
    Assumed for the baseline mission in Sections 1.2 and 7.2 to reach 1 arcmin resolution at 300 GHz.
  • Mirror temperature and emissivity = 8 K, 1% emissivity
    Assumed cold telescope to limit photon noise; Section 7.2 says 10 K or preferably less, an inconsistency in the required temperature.
  • Spectral resolution = R = 300
    Assumed across the survey; Section 7.1 lists R=200-400 as a range for some science goals.
  • Number of beams and optical efficiency = 64 dual-polarization beams, 25% (Section 1.2) or 30% (Section 7.2) efficiency
    Directly sets survey speed and sensitivity; the two efficiency values are inconsistent.
  • Survey area and integration time = Full-sky plus 400 deg^2 deep survey, 10^4 hours each
    Assumed in Figure 3 and Table 1; sensitivity forecasts scale with these choices.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Line luminosities of [CII], CO, [NII], and [OIII] are derived from IR luminosity using observationally-based scaling relations that are assumed constant with redshift.
    Section 1.2; the paper states these relations are uncertain by a factor of a few at low z and up to an order of magnitude at z>6. All SNR and cosmological forecasts inherit this uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The SFR density from the EAGLE simulation used to set IR luminosities is a good representation of the real galaxy population.
    Section 1.2; EAGLE SFRD is said to fit UV-based observational constraints, but the line ratios remain unconstrained.
  • domain assumption CMB effects on the CO spectral line energy distribution at high redshift are negligible for the forecasts.
    Section 1.2 explicitly states this effect was not accounted for; it can suppress low-J CO and enhance high-J CO during the EoR (ref [100]), which would change predicted signals.
  • domain assumption Interloper lines (e.g., CO lines contaminating [CII]) can be separated in map space using spatial correlation with large-scale structure.
    Section 8.1; the paper argues this strategy avoids dependence on uncertain CO astrophysics, but the claim is not demonstrated with simulations or data.
  • domain assumption Standard cosmological forecasting tools (Fisher matrix, Alcock-Paczynski, scale-dependent bias) from cited literature apply to this instrument.
    Sections 6.1 and 6.2; methods are taken from refs [13,14,15,41,72] rather than derived here.
  • domain assumption Planck priors from plike(TT+TE+EE+lowE) are valid inputs for the Fisher forecasts.
    Table 1 note; standard use of Planck chains, not a new assumption, but the forecast constraints inherit any systematics in those priors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mapping Large-Scale-Structure Evolution over Cosmic Times." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M3EWMHMO

@misc{pith2026190807533,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mapping Large-Scale-Structure Evolution over Cosmic Times},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M3EWMHMO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07533}
}
read the original abstract

This paper outlines the science case for line-intensity mapping with a space-borne instrument targeting the sub-millimeter (microwaves) to the far-infrared (FIR) wavelength range. Our goal is to observe and characterize the large-scale structure in the Universe from present times to the high redshift Epoch of Reionization. This is essential to constrain the cosmology of our Universe and form a better understanding of various mechanisms that drive galaxy formation and evolution. We argue that the proposed frequency range would make it possible to probe important metal cooling lines such as [CII] up to very high redshift as well as a large number of rotational lines of the CO molecule. These can be used to trace molecular gas and dust evolution and constrain the buildup in both the cosmic star formation rate density and the cosmic infrared background (CIB). Moreover, surveys at the highest frequencies will detect FIR lines which are used as diagnostics of galaxies and AGN. Tomography of these lines over a wide redshift range will enable invaluable measurements of the cosmic expansion history at epochs inaccessible to other methods, competitive constraints on the parameters of the standard model of cosmology, and numerous tests of dark matter, dark energy, modified gravity and inflation. To reach these goals, large-scale structure must be mapped over a wide range in frequency to trace its time evolution over a reasonable fraction of the volume of the observable Universe. In addition, the surveyed area needs to be very large to beat cosmic variance and to probe the largest scales where its easier to separate the astrophysical and cosmological contributions to the observed signal. Only, a space-borne mission can properly meet these requirements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.07533 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: A comparison between the measurements of discrete bright galaxies by the VLA and the fluctuations in the total CO emission from all the galaxies by the COMAP experiment, if similar observation time is dedicated by both to a small patch of sky. Right: LIM can probe the &80% volume of the observable Universe which is out of reach of CMB and galaxy surveys. Targets for LIM cover a large swath of the electromagnet… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spectral lines detectable by a sky survey in submillimiter to high-frequency radio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Estimated instrument sensitivities for the deep and full-sky surveys (purple dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Forcast for constraints on the SFRD across cosmic times using a combination of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral energy distribution of the extragalactic background light from [16]. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Model-independent constraints on the shape of the cosmic expansion history, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Current LIM experimental roadmap for detection of CII at EoR redshifts and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reading Between the Lines: Forward Modeling Dust, Continuum, and Spectral Cleaning for Multi-Line Intensity Mapping

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using a SAM-based mock, multi-line intensity-mapping cross-power spectra show dust acts as a line-pair- and redshift-dependent suppression, and PCA cleaning with about 20 modes best balances line recovery against cont...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aghamousa et al

    A. Aghamousa et al. The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design. 2016

    2016

  2. [2]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. 2018

    2018

  3. [3]

    Aguirre and STARFIRE Collaboration

    J. Aguirre and STARFIRE Collaboration. STARFIRE: The Spectroscopic Terahertz Air- borne Receiver for Far-InfraRed Exploration. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #231, volume 231 of American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , page 328.04, Jan. 2018

    2018

  4. [4]

    Akrami et al

    Y. Akrami et al. Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity. 2019

    2018

  5. [5]

    Alcock and B

    C. Alcock and B. Paczynski. An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant. Nature, 281:358–359, 1979

    1979

  6. [6]

    Amiri et al

    M. Amiri et al. Observations of Fast Radio Bursts at Frequencies down to 400 Megahertz. 2019

    2019

  7. [7]

    C. J. Anderson, N. J. Luciw, and Y. C. e. a. Li. Low-amplitude clustering in low-redshift 21-cm intensity maps cross-correlated with 2dF galaxy densities. MNRAS, 476:3382– 3392, May 2018

    2018

  8. [8]

    D. J. Bacon et al. Cosmology with Phase 1 of the Square Kilometre Array: Red Book 2018: Technical specifications and performance forecasts. Submitted to: Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., 2018

    2018

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Ballardini and R

    M. Ballardini and R. Maartens. Measuring ISW with next-generation radio surveys. 2018

    2018

  2. [10]

    Bandura, G

    K. Bandura, G. E. Addison, M. Amiri, J. R. Bond, D. Campbell-Wilson, and L. e. a. Connor. Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) pathfinder. In Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V, volume 9145 of Proc.SPIE, page 914522, July 2014

    2014

  3. [11]

    Battersby and L

    C. Battersby and L. e. a. Armus. The Origins Space Telescope. Nature Astronomy, 2:596–599, Aug 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    R. A. Battye, I. W. A. Browne, C. Dickinson, G. Heron, B. Maffei, and A. Pourtsidou. H I intensity mapping: a single dish approach. MNRAS, 434:1239–1256, Sept. 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    J. L. Bernal, P. C. Breysse, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, and E. D. Kovetz. A User’s Guide to Extracting Cosmological Information from Line-Intensity Maps. 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    J. L. Bernal, P. C. Breysse, and E. D. Kovetz. The Cosmic Expansion History from Line-Intensity Mapping. 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    J. L. Bernal, L. Verde, and A. G. Riess. The trouble with H0. JCAP, 1610(10):019, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    B´ ethermin

    M. B´ ethermin. Compter les galaxies infrarouges, raconter leur histoire : propri´ et´ es statistiques des galaxies infrarouges ` a grand redshift et origine du fond extragalactique infrarouge. PhD thesis, IAS (Orsay, France), Sep 2011

    2011

  9. [17]

    B´ ethermin, E

    M. B´ ethermin, E. Le Floc’h, O. Ilbert, A. Conley, and e. a. Lagache. HerMES: deep number counts at 250 µm, 350 µm and 500 µm in the COSMOS and GOODS-N fields and the build-up of the cosmic infrared background. A&A, 542:A58, Jun 2012. 19

    2012

  10. [18]

    B´ ethermin, L

    M. B´ ethermin, L. Wang, O. Dor´ e, G. Lagache, M. Sargent, E. Daddi, M. Cousin, and H. Aussel. The redshift evolution of the distribution of star formation among dark matter halos as seen in the infrared. A&A, 557:A66, Sep 2013

    2013

  11. [19]

    Bonato, G

    M. Bonato, G. De Zotti, D. Leisawitz, M. Negrello, M. Massardi, I. Baronchelli, Z.-Y. Cai, C. M. Bradford, A. Pope, E. J. Murphy, L. Armus, and A. Cooray. Origins Space Telescope: Predictions for far-IR spectroscopic surveys. PASA, 36:e017, Jan 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    G. C. Bower, G. K. Keating, D. P. Marrone, and S. T. YT Lee Array Team. Cosmic Structure and Galaxy Evolution through Intensity Mapping of Molecular Gas. 227:426.04, Jan. 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    P. C. Breysse, E. D. Kovetz, P. S. Behroozi, L. Dai, and M. Kamionkowski. Insights from probability distribution functions of intensity maps. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 467(3):2996–3010, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    P. C. Breysse, E. D. Kovetz, and M. Kamionkowski. The high-redshift star formation history from carbon-monoxide intensity maps. MNRAS, 457:L127–L131, Mar. 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    P. C. Breysse and M. Rahman. Feeding cosmic star formation: exploring high-redshift molecular gas with CO intensity mapping. MNRAS, 468:741–750, June 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    C. M. Casey, J. A. Zavala, J. Spilker, E. da Cunha, J. Hodge, C.-L. Hung, J. Staguhn, S. L. Finkelstein, and P. Drew. The Brightest Galaxies in the Dark Ages: Galaxies’ Dust Continuum Emission during the Reionization Era. ApJ, 862(1):77, Jul 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    E. A. Chaikin, N. V. Tyulneva, and A. e. A. Kaurov. Observing Galaxy Mergers at the Epoch of Reionization. ApJ, 853(1):81, Jan 2018

    2018

  18. [26]

    A. Cooray. Extragalactic background light measurements and applications. Royal Society Open Science, 3:150555, Mar 2016

    2016

  19. [27]

    Cooray, T.-C

    A. Cooray, T.-C. Chang, S. Unwin, M. Zemcov, A. Coffey, P. Morrissey, N. Raouf, S. Lipscy, M. Shannon, G. Wu, R. Cen, R. R. Chary, O. Dor´ e, X. Fan, G. G. Fazio, S. L. Finkelstein, C. Heneka, B. Lee, P. Linden, H. Nayyeri, J. Rhodes, R. Sadoun, M. B. Silva, H. Trac, H.-Y. Wu, ...

    1903 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Cooray et al

    A. Cooray et al. Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper. 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Creque-Sarbinowski and M

    C. Creque-Sarbinowski and M. Kamionkowski. Searching for Decaying and Annihilating Dark Matter with Line Intensity Mapping. Phys. Rev., D98(6):063524, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    A. T. Crites et al. The time-pilot intensity mapping experiment. Proc.SPIE, 9153:9153 – 9153 – 9, 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    R. A. C. Croft et al. Large-scale clustering of Ly α emission intensity from SDSS/BOSS. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 457(4):3541–3572, 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    R. A. C. Croft, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, Z. Zheng, M. Blomqvist, and M. Pieri. Intensity mapping with SDSS/BOSS Lyman-α emission, quasars, and their Lyman-α forest. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 481(1):1320–1336, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Cunnington, I

    S. Cunnington, I. Harrison, A. Pourtsidou, and D. Bacon. H I intensity mapping for clustering-based redshift estimation. MNRAS, 482:3341–3355, Jan 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    da Cunha, B

    E. da Cunha, B. Groves, and F. e. a. Walter. On the Effect of the Cosmic Microwave Background in High-redshift (Sub-)millimeter Observations. ApJ, 766(1):13, Mar 2013. 20

    2013

  27. [35]

    Dalgarno and R

    A. Dalgarno and R. A. McCray. Heating and Ionization of HI Regions. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , 10:375, Jan. 1972

    1972

  28. [36]

    D. R. DeBoer et al. Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA). Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 129:045001, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    B. R. Dinda, A. A. Sen, and T. R. Choudhury. Dark energy constraints from the 21cm intensity mapping surveys with SKA1. arXiv:1804.11137, Apr 2018

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dor´ e, J

    O. Dor´ e, J. Bock, M. Ashby, and C. et al. Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1412.4872, Dec 2014

    2014 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Dor´ e et al

    O. Dor´ e et al. Science Impacts of the SPHEREx All-Sky Optical to Near-Infrared Spectral Survey II: Report of a Community Workshop on the Scientific Synergies Between the SPHEREx Survey and Other Astronomy Observatories. 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    A. Endo, K. Karatsu, Y. Tamura, and et al. First light demonstration of the integrated superconducting spectrometer. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1906.10216, Jun 2019

    1906 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Fonseca, R

    J. Fonseca, R. Maartens, and M. G. Santos. Synergies between intensity maps of hydrogen lines. MNRAS, 479:3490–3497, Sep 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Gil-Mar´ ın, J

    H. Gil-Mar´ ın, J. Nore˜ na, L. Verde, W. J. Percival, C. Wagner, M. Manera, and D. P. Schneider. The power spectrum and bispectrum of SDSS DR11 BOSS galaxies – I. Bias and gravity. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 451(1):539–580, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    Y. Gong, A. Cooray, and e. a. Silva, Marta. Intensity Mapping of the [CII] Fine Structure Line during the Epoch of Reionization. Astrophys. J., 745:49, 2012

    2012

  36. [44]

    Y. Gong, A. Cooray, and e. a. Silva, Marta B. Intensity Mapping of H α, Hβ, [OII], and [OIII] Lines at z ¡ 5. ApJ, 835(2):273, Feb 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    A. Hall, C. Bonvin, and A. Challinor. Testing general relativity with 21-cm intensity mapping. Phys. Rev. D , 87:064026, Mar 2013

    2013

  38. [46]

    Heneka, A

    C. Heneka, A. Cooray, and C. Feng. Probing the Intergalactic Medium with Ly α and 21 cm Fluctuations. ApJ, 848(1):52, Oct 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    Herrera-Camus, A

    R. Herrera-Camus, A. D. Bolatto, and e. a. Wolfire. [C II] 158 µm Emission as a Star Formation Tracer. ApJ, 800:1, Feb. 2015

    2015

  40. [48]

    G. J. Hill et al. The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX): Description and Early Pilot Survey Results. ASP Conf. Ser. , 399:115–118, 2008

    2008

  41. [49]

    H. T. Ihle et al. Joint power spectrum and voxel intensity distribution forecast on the CO luminosity function with COMAP. Astrophys. J., 871(1):75, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Jain et al

    B. Jain et al. Novel Probes of Gravity and Dark Energy. 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    G. K. Keating, G. C. Bower, and D. P. e. a. Marrone. First Results from COPSS: The CO Power Spectrum Survey. ApJ, 814:140, Dec. 2015

    2015

  44. [52]

    G. K. Keating and e. a. Marrone. COPSS II: The Molecular Gas Content of Ten Million Cubic Megaparsecs at Redshift z 3. ApJ, 830:34, Oct. 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    Koopmans, J

    L. Koopmans, J. Pritchard, and G. e. a. Mellema. The Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionisation with SKA. In Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 1, Apr 2015. 21

    2015

  46. [54]

    L. V. E. Koopmans et al. The Cosmic Dawn and Epoch of Reionization with the Square Kilometre Array. PoS, AASKA14:001, 2015

    2015

  47. [55]

    E. D. Kovetz et al. Line-Intensity Mapping: 2017 Status Report. prepared for Physics Reports, 2017

    2017

  48. [56]

    E. D. Kovetz et al. Astrophysics and Cosmology with Line-Intensity Mapping. 2019

    2019

  49. [57]

    Lagache, M

    G. Lagache, M. Cousin, and M. Chatzikos. The [CII] 158µm line emission in high-redshift galaxies. A&A, 609:A130, Feb 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    K.-G. Lee, A. Krolewski, and M. e. a. White. First Data Release of the COSMOS Ly α Mapping and Tomography Observations: 3D Lyα Forest Tomography at 2.05 &lt; z &lt; 2.55. ApJS, 237(2):31, Aug 2018

    2018

  51. [59]

    T. Y. Li, R. H. Wechsler, K. Devaraj, and S. E. Church. Connecting CO Intensity Map- ping to Molecular Gas and Star Formation in the Epoch of Galaxy Assembly. Astrophys. J., 817(2):169, 2016

    2016

  52. [60]

    A. Lidz, S. R. Furlanetto, S. P. Oh, J. Aguirre, T.-C. Chang, O. Dor´ e, and J. R. Pritchard. Intensity Mapping with Carbon Monoxide Emission Lines and the Redshifted 21 cm Line. Astrophys. J., 741:70, 2011

    2011

  53. [61]

    A. Lidz, O. Zahn, and F. et al. Probing Reionization with the 21 cm-Galaxy Cross Power Spectrum. Astrophys. J., 690:252–266, 2009

    2009

  54. [62]

    Loeb and S

    A. Loeb and S. R. Furlanetto. The First Galaxies in the Universe . 2013

    2013

  55. [63]

    Madau and M

    P. Madau and M. Dickinson. Cosmic Star Formation History. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys., 52:415–486, 2014

    2014

  56. [64]

    J. M. Maldacena. Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field infla- tionary models. JHEP, 05:013, 2003

    2003

  57. [65]

    A. S. Maniyar, M. B´ ethermin, and G. Lagache. Star formation history from the cosmic infrared background anisotropies. A&A, 614:A39, Jun 2018

    2018

  58. [66]

    Mashian, A

    N. Mashian, A. Loeb, and A. Sternberg. Spectral Distortion of the CMB by the Cumu- lative CO Emission from Galaxies throughout Cosmic History. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 458(1):L99–L103, 2016

    2016

  59. [67]

    Mashian, A

    N. Mashian, A. Sternberg, and A. Loeb. Predicting the intensity mapping signal for multi-J CO lines. JCAP, 2015(11):028, Nov 2015

    2015

  60. [68]

    Mashian, A

    N. Mashian, A. Sternberg, and A. Loeb. Predicting the intensity mapping signal for multi-J CO lines. JCAP, 1511(11):028, 2015

    2015

  61. [69]

    K. W. Masui et al. Measurement of 21 cm brightness fluctuations at z 0.8 in cross- correlation. Astrophys. J., 763:L20, 2013

    2013

  62. [70]

    K. W. Masui, E. R. Switzer, and B. et al. Measurement of 21 cm Brightness Fluctuations at z ˜0.8 in Cross-correlation. ApJ, 763:L20, Jan. 2013

    2013

  63. [71]

    M´ enard, R

    B. M´ enard, R. Scranton, S. Schmidt, C. Morrison, D. Jeong, T. Budavari, and M. Rah- man. Clustering-based redshift estimation: method and application to data. 2013

    2013

  64. [72]

    Moradinezhad Dizgah, G

    A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, G. K. Keating, and A. Fialkov. Probing Cosmic Origins with CO and [CII] Emission Lines. Astrophys. J., 870(1):L4, 2019. 22

    2019

  65. [73]

    Moriwaki, N

    K. Moriwaki, N. Yoshida, and e. a. Shimizu. The distribution and physical properties of high-redshift [O III] emitters in a cosmological hydrodynamics simulation. MNRAS, 481:L84–L88, Nov. 2018

    2018

  66. [74]

    L. B. Newburgh et al. HIRAX: A Probe of Dark Energy and Radio Transients. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. , 9906:99065X, 2016

    2016

  67. [75]

    Odegard and e

    N. Odegard and e. a. Weiland. Determination of the Cosmic Infrared Background from COBE/FIRAS and Planck HFI Observations. ApJ, 877(1):40, May 2019

    2019

  68. [76]

    Padmanabhan

    H. Padmanabhan. Constraining the evolution of CII intensity through the end stages of reionization. 2018

    2018

  69. [77]

    A. R. Parsons et al. New Limits on 21cm EoR From PAPER-32 Consistent with an X-Ray Heated IGM at z=7.7. Astrophys. J., 788:106, 2014

    2014

  70. [78]

    A. H. Patil and S. e. a. Yatawatta. Upper Limits on the 21 cm Epoch of Reionization Power Spectrum from One Night with LOFAR. ApJ, 838(1):65, Mar 2017

    2017

  71. [79]

    Pen, T.-C

    U.-L. Pen, T.-C. Chang, and e. a. Peterson, Jeffrey B. The GMRT EoR Experiment: Limits on Polarized Sky Brightness at 150 MHz. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 399:181, 2009

    2009

  72. [80]

    M. M. Pieri et al. WEAVE-QSO: A Massive Intergalactic Medium Survey for the William Herschel Telescope. 2016

    2016

  73. [81]

    Pourtsidou

    A. Pourtsidou. Testing gravity at large scales with H I intensity mapping. MNRAS, 461:1457–1464, Sep 2016

    2016

  74. [82]

    A. R. Pullen, O. Dor´ e, and J. Bock. Intensity Mapping across Cosmic Times with the Lyα Line. Astrophys. J., 786:111, 2014

    2014

  75. [83]

    A. R. Pullen, P. Serra, T.-C. Chang, O. Dor´ e, and S. Ho. Search for CII Emission on Cosmological Scales at Redshift Z 2.6. 2017

    2017

  76. [84]

    A. G. Riess and a. a. Casertano. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM. Astrophys. J., 876(1):85, 2019

    2019

  77. [85]

    A. G. Riess et al. A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J., 826(1):56, 2016

    2016

  78. [86]

    B. E. Robertson, R. S. Ellis, S. R. Furlanetto, and J. S. Dunlop. Cosmic Reionization and Early Star-forming Galaxies: a Joint Analysis of new Constraints From Planck and the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J., 802(2):L19, 2015

    2015

  79. [87]

    M. G. Santos et al. MeerKLASS: MeerKAT Large Area Synoptic Survey. 2017

    2017

  80. [88]

    M. T. Sargent, M. B´ ethermin, and E. e. a. Daddi. The Contribution of Starbursts and Normal Galaxies to Infrared Luminosity Functions at z &lt; 2. ApJL, 747(2):L31, Mar 2012

    2012

  81. [89]

    Schaye, R

    J. Schaye, R. A. Crain, R. G. Bower, M. Furlong, and S. et al. The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments. MNRAS, 446(1):521–554, Jan 2015

    2015

  82. [90]

    S. J. Schmidt, B. M´ enard, and e. a. Scranton, Ryan. Inferring the redshift distribution of the cosmic infrared background. MNRAS, 446(3):2696–2708, Jan 2015. 23

    2015

  83. [91]

    M. B. Silva, M. G. Santos, A. Cooray, and Y. Gong. Prospects for Detecting [CII] Emission During the Epoch of Reionization. Astrophys. J., 806(2):209, 2015

    2015

  84. [92]

    M. B. Silva, M. G. Santos, Y. Gong, A. Cooray, and J. Bock. Intensity Mapping of Ly α Emission during the Epoch of Reionization. ApJ, 763:132, Feb. 2013

    2013

  85. [93]

    M. B. Silva, S. Zaroubi, R. Kooistra, and A. Cooray. Tomographic Intensity Mapping versus Galaxy Surveys: Observing the Universe in H-alpha emission with new generation instruments. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1711.09902, Nov. 2017

    2017 arXiv

  86. [94]

    E. F. Spring and M. J. Micha lowski. Observational evidence for constant gas accretion rate since z = 5. MNRAS, 471(1):L101–L104, Oct 2017

    2017

  87. [95]

    G. J. Stacey et al. CCAT-prime: Science with an Ultra-widefield Submillimeter Obser- vatory at Cerro Chajnantor. 2018

    2018

  88. [96]

    Stein, M

    G. Stein, M. A. Alvarez, and J. R. Bond. The mass-Peak Patch algorithm for fast gen- eration of deep all-sky dark matter halo catalogues and its N-body validation. MNRAS, 483:2236–2250, Feb. 2019

    2019

  89. [97]

    G. Sun, L. Moncelsi, M. P. Viero, M. B. Silva, J. Bock, and B. et al. A Foreground Masking Strategy for [C II] Intensity Mapping Experiments Using Galaxies Selected by Stellar Mass and Redshift. ApJ, 856(2):107, Apr 2018

    2018

  90. [98]

    The Origins Space Telescope (OST) Mission Concept Study Interim Report

    The OST mission concept study team. The Origins Space Telescope (OST) Mission Concept Study Interim Report. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1809.09702, Sep 2018

    2018 arXiv

  91. [99]

    S. J. Tingay, R. Goeke, and e. a. Bowman. The Murchison Widefield Array: The Square Kilometre Array Precursor at Low Radio Frequencies. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 30:e007, Jan 2013

    2013

  92. [100]

    Vallini, A

    L. Vallini, A. Pallottini, A. Ferrara, S. Gallerani, E. Sobacchi, and C. Behrens. CO line emission from galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization. MNRAS, 473(1):271–285, Jan 2018

    2018

  93. [101]

    M. P. van Haarlem, M. W. Wise, A. W. Gunst, G. Heald, and e. a. McKean. LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray. A&A, 556:A2, Aug 2013

    2013

  94. [102]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess. Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe. 2019

    2019

  95. [103]

    M. P. Viero, L. Moncelsi, and e. a. Quadri, R. F. HerMES: The Contribution to the Cosmic Infrared Background from Galaxies Selected by Mass and Redshift. ApJ, 779:32, Dec. 2013

    2013

  96. [104]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, S

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Genel, and e. a. Castorina. Ingredients for 21 cm Intensity Mapping. ApJ, 866:135, Oct. 2018

    2018

  97. [105]

    T. Wang, C. Schreiber, and C. e. a. Elbaz. A dominant population of optically invisible massive galaxies in the early Universe. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1908.02372, Aug 2019

    1908 arXiv

  98. [106]

    K. C. Wong et al. H0LiCOW XIII. A 2.4% measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early and late-Universe probes. 2019

    2019

  99. [107]

    F. Wu, Y. Wang, and Z. et al. Tianlai: a 21cm radio telescope array for BAO and dark energy, status and progress. In Proceedings, 51st Rencontres de Moriond, Cosmology session: La Thuile, Italy, March 19-26, 2016 , pages 315–318. ARISF, ARISF, 2016. 24

    2016

  100. [108]

    S. Yang, A. R. Pullen, and E. R. Switzer. Evidence for CII diffuse line emission at redshift z∼ 2.6. 2019

    2019

  101. [109]

    Zhang, D

    Z.-Y. Zhang, D. Romano, and R. J. e. a. Ivison. Stellar populations dominated by massive stars in dusty starburst galaxies across cosmic time. Nature, 558:260–263, June 2018. 25

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.