Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A nonparametric Bayesian analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects in digital experimentation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1412.8563 v4 pith:M3JJFJJN submitted 2014-12-30 stat.AP

classification stat.AP
keywords treatmenttreesanalysisdigitallinearregressionalgorithmsapplied
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Randomized controlled trials play an important role in how Internet companies predict the impact of policy decisions and product changes. In these `digital experiments', different units (people, devices, products) respond differently to the treatment. This article presents a fast and scalable Bayesian nonparametric analysis of such heterogeneous treatment effects and their measurement in relation to observable covariates. New results and algorithms are provided for quantifying the uncertainty associated with treatment effect measurement via both linear projections and nonlinear regression trees (CART and Random Forests). For linear projections, our inference strategy leads to results that are mostly in agreement with those from the frequentist literature. We find that linear regression adjustment of treatment effect averages (i.e., post-stratification) can provide some variance reduction, but that this reduction will be vanishingly small in the low-signal and large-sample setting of digital experiments. For regression trees, we provide uncertainty quantification for the machine learning algorithms that are commonly applied in tree-fitting. We argue that practitioners should look to ensembles of trees (forests) rather than individual trees in their analysis. The ideas are applied on and illustrated through an example experiment involving 21 million unique users of EBay.com.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Online multi-layer FDR control

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    New multi-layer versions of alpha-investing, LOND and LORD provide simultaneous FDR and mFDR control over multiple partitions of an online hypothesis stream.

Pith tools